Upload
srishti
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 MGEC
1/8
GYAAN KOSH
TERM 1Learning and
Development
Council, CAC
Managerial Economics
This document covers the basic concepts of Managerial
Economics covered in Term 1. The document only
summarizes the main concepts and is not intended to be an
instructive material on the subject.
8/2/2019 MGEC
2/8
Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council, CAC
Opportunity cost: Taken into account for economic decisions. Opportunity Cost is
the next best or alternative benefit from an investment
Sunk costs: Never taken into account for economic decisions.
Marginal Analysis: Used for profit maximization (deciding how much to produce)
where TR and TC are functions of quantity. To maximize profits we take
derivative=0
For profit maximization, marginal revenue should be equal to marginal costs for EACH activity.
If MR > MC increase production
If MR < MC decrease production
Demand Curve is the Marginal Benefit curve
Consumer Surplus = Net benefit to customers = Willingness to pay total paid. (Area under the demand curve
above the price line)
Demand and elasticity
Demand shows quantity purchased as a function of price.
Managers Knowledge of demand is critical because it helps in:
Making production decisions Defining market structure Taking strategic and operational decisions
P r o f it M a x im iz a tio n G r a p h
8/2/2019 MGEC
3/8
8/2/2019 MGEC
4/8
Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council, CAC
Supply
The supply curve is the MC curve above the shutdown point. The shutdown point in case of unavoidable cost is
given by the lowest point of average variable cost. And the shutdown point in case of avoidable costs is given by the
lowest point of average total cost.
Types of market competition
Number of Firms
Monopoly: One Firm Competition: Many Firms Other cases, duopoly
8/2/2019 MGEC
5/8
Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council, CAC
Barriers to Entry
Monopoly high barriers to new entry
Competition free entryShort run (SR)
Due to frictions, firm can only adjust some inputs for which it occurs variable costs Other inputs cannot be adjusted, for which it incurs fixed costs
Long run (LR)
Enough time passes for the firm to adjust all inputs All costs are variable
Economies of Scale
AC decreases as X increases Quantity discounts on purchases are one way of realizing such economies
Economies of Scope
Joint production cost of multiple products is less than cost of producing each individually
Market efficiency & distortions
Pareto Efficiency: No reallocation would make one person better off without making someone else worse off. So in
order to maximize net gain to society we need to maximize sum of Consumer Surplus and Producer Surplus; otherwise,
there will be a Deadweight Loss (DWL)
Antitrust laws: Promote a competitive economy competition benefits consumers
Possible Prohibitions as a result of antitrust laws
Prohibit anti-competitive contracts and agreements Exclusive contracts, tying, etc. Prohibit abuse of dominant position: Collusion/Cartelization - Explicit or Implicit Predatory pricing Bid rigging
Attempt to monopolize a market through M&A activity
Note: Cognizance of all the above situations can help in finding out possible antitrust violations in case analyses.
8/2/2019 MGEC
6/8
Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council, CAC
Consumer behavior
The driving assumption for consumers preferences is that we are rational. Being rational entails:
Completeness: consumers can compare and rank all possible baskets. Transitivity: (A > B) and (B > C) (A >C) * Consistency More is better than less
Indifference Curve: It is a graphical representation of consumers preferences and represents all combinations of
market baskets that provide a person with the same level of satisfaction. The shape of IC indicates tradeoffs.
Marginal Rate of Substitution: Measures the value of 1 extra unit of a good in terms of another
Substitution effect: Buy more of the relatively cheaper good and less of the relatively expensive good.
Income effect: Consumers enjoy an increase in purchasing power because one of the goods is now cheaper
They occur simultaneously but in opposite directions
Budget line: It is the amount of good that I can buy given a particular income. At some prices of goods Pa and Pb, a
consumer can buy a maximum of I/Pa (all goods A) or I/Pb (all goods B). The line joining these two points is called the
budget line. Any point on this line represents a combination of two goods that can be bought at the given prices and
income levels.
Special case: Giffen goods: Income effect is larger than substitution effect. Demand is upward sloping.
GAME THEORY: Simultaneous games
Assumptions:
Buyer is able to assign a monetary value to each transaction and product: reservation price (RP). This is themaximum price that a buyer is willing to pay for a product
A buyer evaluates a transaction in terms of its consumer surplusAlthough game theory began as applied mathematics, it has become a dominant mode of reasoning in business and
economics. Game Theory improves strategic decision-making. It makes one aware of which strategy matters in what
situation, to say nothing of the strategic nuances on the part of one's competitors or opponents. It can improve one's
ability to run a business or to evaluate changes in policy. Phrases such as "Competitive Advantage", "Winner's Curse",
"Everyday Low Prices", "First Mover Advantage", "Market Failure", "Credibility", "Incentive Contracts", "Hostile
Takeover", "Coalition Building", "Cartelization", "Mutually Assured Destruction", make a lot more sense when they
are strategically explained using game theory.
8/2/2019 MGEC
7/8
Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council, CAC
Examples of application of game theory:
Prisoner's dilemma: Cigarette Advertising on TV: In 1971, when advertising for cigarettes on television was banned, the
profits of the cigarette companies wentup.
Folk theorem: Do firms always conspire to monopolize the market? Game theory says that in a continuously repeated
game, competition leads to collaboration. That is why some times the biggest competitors appear to be colluding even
when they are not doing so.
Stag Hunt: In early societies, people formed alliances to hunt deer. If even one person in the group did not help in the
hunt, the deer would be lost. The hunters were sometimes tempted to leave the hunt by seeing rabbits, but they
preferred deer to rabbit. However, only one person was needed to catch a rabbit. From a game theory perspective, the
best strategy is to hunt the deer, but people may decide to hunt the rabbit because they believe others may defect
from the hunt also.
Countries face the same dilemma in situations involving nuclear weapons. Each country generally believes that the
world would be better if no countries possessed nuclear weapons. However, the temptation to build up a nuclear
arsenal arises because each country is afraid that other countries may stash nuclear warheads and undermine
international security.
Centipede game: Following the designation of Mr. Bush as President-Elect and the election of the new Congress, the
smart money seemed to be betting that Bush would have been a one-term President and that the Democrats would
have an excellent chance of retaking the Congress in '02. Centipede game explained how the Republicans were likely to
respond - assuming that the corporate Republican Party would have acted as a rational, self-interested agent as those
terms were understood in game theory.
Hotelling law: The observation by Hotelling was that in many markets it is rational for all the producers to make their
products as similar as possible. Suppose, for example, there are two newsagents in a street, both want to maximize
their share of local business by locating their shop so that it is the nearest newsagent for as much of the trade visiting
the street as possible. In this situation, both newsagents will position themselves in the middle of the street
guaranteeing themselves half the market. It would be socially more desirable for them to separate themselves, and sit
a third of the way along the street from different ends. Unfortunately, if one newsagent did this, the other could
position himself so as to capture more than half the total market. Too little variety results from the process. Hotelling's
law manifests itself in numerous markets - competing airline operators scheduling their airlines to run at the same time
for example.
Nash Equilibrium in Game Theory is a pair of strategies that forms a self-enforcing agreement i.e.
when both players choose a strategy which is their best response to the opponent Neither is made better off by unilaterallyswitching to another strategy
Mixed Strategies: Strategies in which players make random choices among possible actions based on set of chosen
probabilities
Repetitive game: Only a small number of sellers are sufficient to have benefits of competition. When games are
indefiniteanything can happen rivals could end up charging low prices in each round, high prices in each round, or
anything in between. In repeated play of PD, a strategy is no longer what price you pick in each round but rather a rule
you use to select price in each round
8/2/2019 MGEC
8/8
Gyaan Kosh Term 1 MGEC Learning & Development Council, CAC
Three examples of such rules:
Choose the low price in each round (regardless) Grim trigger rule: choose a high price in the first round. In subsequent rounds choose high price if rival
chose high price in previous round. If rival chose low price in previous round then choose low price inevery round thereafter
Tit-for-tat: choose a high price in the first round. In subsequent rounds choose the price that rival chose inprevious round.
Predatory pricing drive rivals out and creates a reputation for toughness to deter future entry, thus allowing the firm
to raise prices.
Competition in capacity
Cournot Model: This is the traditional model of competition in capacity/ quantity. The strategy consists of making
simultaneous quantity choices. Both the firms have same information, and no cooperation is allowed.
StackelbergModel: This model supports the concept of first mover advantage.
Differentiation
Vertical: when your product is superior to your competitors product for allbuyers. This superiority allows oneto extract price premium.
Horizontal: Different products both of which are neither superior nor inferior. For e.g. red vs. blue widgets. Thisallows firms to price above cost because there will be different buyers in the market willing to pay some price
for their preferred widgets.
Differentiation softens price competition
Information asymmetry and moral hazard
Information asymmetry: Sellers know more than buyers
Buyerseller information asymmetry (BSIA) is a growingproblem. Application
Second Hand Market Auction Flea Markets Insurance
Market for Lemons: Also called ADVERSE SELECTION: Because of information asymmetry, low quality goods drive outhigh quality goods. That is why markets sometime break down
Signaling in the Market:- Firms with better quality products can use strong signals of quality to convey their superiority.
E.g. warranties.
Moral Hazard: When actions are unobserved i.e. people cant be monitored they might become careless and raise
costs. E.g. Behaviour after insurance.