Upload
dominic-logan
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1111M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Goals for the workshop
The case for incentives
Salary scales
Design of incentive systemsWhat is rewarded
Who is rewarded
Who decides on award
2222M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Goals for the workshop
The case for incentives
Salary scales
Design of incentive systemsWhat is rewarded
Who is rewarded
Who decides on award
3333M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Workshop goals - today Share best practices and review lessons of policy
implementation with the establishment of incentive systems in other countries
from the perspective of those in government who initiated related policies and practices…
… as well as those who were confronted with delivering them at the frontline
– Government– Why and how did governments conceptualise incentives– What did they do to implement them, and what obstacles
did they face during implementation– What results did they get out of this– What would they do differently if they could start all over
– The profession– To what extent where the reform goals shared (and why)– How was the implementation managed and perceived– What would they do differently if they could start all over .
4444M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Workshop goals - tomorrow Implications for Mexico Points of agreement as to what Mexico can learn from
other countries’ experiences Prioritising the challenges which Mexico will face in
establishing incentives structures and stimuli Implications for the work of the Allianza
5555M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Goals for the workshop
The case for incentives
Salary scales
Design of incentive systemsWhat is rewarded
Who is rewarded
Who decides on award
6666M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
The quality of educational outcomes cannot exceed the quality of teachers
*Among the top 20% of teachers**Among the bottom 20% of teachersSource:Sanders & Rivers Cumulative and Residual Effects on Future Student Academic Achievement
Percentiles
Stu
dent
perf
orm
ance
Two students withTwo students withsame performancesame performanceTwo students withTwo students withsame performancesame performance
Student with low-performing teacher**
37th percentile
Student with high-performing teacher*
90th percentile
7777M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
The case for incentives Incentives are about…
Giving teachers signals that better work will make a difference for them
Incentives have many dimensions… Fostering an attractive work environment Establishing and facilitating career perspectives Providing access to professional development Identifying and spreading effective teaching
practices
… better pay for better work is just one of them.
8888M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
The case for incentives Incentives can…
Be a catalyst for change Improve efficiency of recruitment Support a culture based on evidence and data
– Better access and use of student achievement data allows teachers to better identify and address key needs, set more appropriate achievement targets, and more closely monitor progress
Unleash initiative for teachers to look actively for ways to improve their performance and increase their interest to actively taking advantage of opportunities
…if they are supported by Accurate and reliable data on the quality of outcomes Strong feedback mechanisms and access
to professional development– Ensuring that teachers not receiving merit pay understand
what they can do to improve performance and have incentives to change behaviour
Effective human resource management and school leadership .
9999M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
The case for incentives Single-salary schedules had their time…
Combat inequities in job allocation Eliminating unprofessional preferential treatment
during evaluation processes
… but may not take education to the level of productivity needed
Most of teacher effects are not explained by teacher characteristics and formal qualifications
In the absence of externalities or information problems, payment for outcomes always trumps payment for inputs in terms of raising overall productivity
– Hiring practices: Information deficiencies in the hiring process can be ameliorated by subsequent employer performance assessments
– Labour-market selection: A performance-related pay programme will attract and retain individuals who are particularly good at what the incentives are attached to
10101010M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
The case for incentives Replacing single salary scales with systems
that connect the difference teachers’ make to their compensation…
… in meaningful ways that can be embraced by employers and teachers…
… faces tough requirements Individual, team or organisational outputs can
be accurately and meaningfully measured Outputs contribute to organisational
performance Pay can be administered in a way that
capitalises on its expected incentive value for potential recipients
Better pay eventually translates into better teaching .
11111111M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Goals for the workshop
The case for incentives
Salary scales
Design of incentive systemsWhat is rewarded
Who is rewarded
Who decides on award
12121212M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Comparing teacher salaries In purchasing power parities
Easy to do but not always relevant– Mexican teachers may care less about whether they can
buy more groceries than Japanese teachers than whether their salaries are competitive compared with other similarly skilled professions
Relative to average national income Depends on national job structures
– Comparing Mexican teachers with the average farm and industrial worker?
– Highly qualified young people today may be less interested in a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work than in an outstanding day’s pay for outstanding work
Other factors entering the equation, e.g. The way in which countries trade off salaries, class
sizes, student-staff ratios, teaching hours for teachers, instruction hours for students…
… determines costs per student… creates the working conditions that attract
or deter teacher recruitment and retention
13131313M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Teachers’ salaries (minimum, after 15 years experience, and maximum) in lower secondary
education (2006)Annual statutory teachers’ salaries in public institutions in lower
secondary education, in equivalent USD converted using PPPs
Equivalent USD converted using PPPs
D3.2
14141414M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Structure of salary scale of teachers in selected countries, lower secondary (2006)
15151515M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Ratio of salary after 15 years of experience to GDP per capita in lower secondary education
(2006)
D3.2
17171717M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Adjustments to base salaryAdditional yearly payments received for the following criteria
(28 countries providing data)
Criteria
Number of countries
Years of experience 9*
Management responsibilities
18*
Additional classes/hours
9*
Special tasks (e.g. counselling)
14*
Location allowance 18*
Special activities (e.g. sports)
9
Teaching special needs
11
Teaching a specific field
8*
Criteria
Number of countries
Higher initial qualifications
8*
Higher level of certification/training
8*
Outstanding teaching performance
7*
Completion of professional development
5*
High performance in entry exam
2*
Family status 9
Age 2* Including Mexico
19191919M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Influence of school evaluations by an inspectorate -Lower secondary education 2006 ( no, low,
moderate, high impact)
Country
Performance appraisal of individual teachers
Assistance to teachers improve their teaching skills
Financial bonuses to teachers
Australia
Belgium (Fl)
Czech Republic
England
Iceland
Ireland
Korea
Portugal
Scotland
Sweden
Turkey
Estonia
20202020M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Goals for the workshop
The case for incentives
Salary scales
Design of incentive systemsWhat is rewarded
Who is rewarded
Who decides on award
21212121M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Design of incentive systems Incentives in use in OECD countries Signing bonuses and forgiveness of teacher education Higher compensation in the early years
– To attract people concerned about initial pay and less interested in the benefits they get as they become older
– Australia, Denmark, England, Finland, Norway and Scotland
Escalating pay in the later years – To retain experience teachers who might otherwise leave
– Austria, Japan, Portugal mid-career, Greece, Hungary and New Zealand experienced teachers
Extra pay and benefits to attract teachers of shortage subjects or to challenging schools
Bonuses based on teachers’ contributions to improved student performance
Salaries based on agreements teachers work out with principals
– To respond to principal’s priorities for the school .
22222222M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Design of incentive systems What is rewarded?
Market incentives– Getting teachers into remote areas or challenging schools
Knowledge and skills / qualifications– Increased pay linked to additional qualifications or demonstrated
skill– Establish a career path for excellent teachers to remain in classrooms– Spread innovation beyond classrooms and school
Merit– Rewarding teachers for their performance and that of their
students– Ranges from compensation based on supervisor evaluations and portfolios
created by teachers to payments awarded on the basis of student growth at the teacher, group and or school
Who is rewarded? Team or group-based incentives
– Should incentives be directed to individual teachers or the teams or schools they serve?
Who decides / adjudicates? What are the criteria for awarding incentives and what is
the role of school leaders and external evaluators in assessing these?
– Trade-offs between objectivity and relevance– Principal evaluation remains a predictor of student achievement
even when teacher value-added is included in the model .
23232323M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Design of incentive systems (1) Some challenges
Devising evaluation systems that accurately measure the contribution of teachers to the education of students while avoiding that
– Structural misalignment between the mission of schools and the outcomes to which incentives are attached: A focus on what can be easily tested can narrow teaching and the curriculum
– Bonuses based on student performance on low level reading and math tests are unlikely to produce high level performance in any subject
– Short-term priorities for improving immediately observable outcomes can undermine more desirable long-term outcomes
– Almost any incentive system can be gamed and needs to be monitored
Initially, pay may be determined by student performance on tests of literacy and mathematics, to the exclusion of many other no less important areas of learning, but the use of such measures may decrease as teachers become more comfortable with the basis on which school leaders make their decisions on who should be hired and who should be promoted
24242424M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Design of incentive systems (2) Some challenges
Separating the contribution of previous teachers from those of current teachers
– Major advances in longitudinal student-level data increasingly allow to estimate value-added contributions at the school, grade and teacher levels
Avoiding that the competition for higher salaries sacrifices collegiality of teachers
– Individual rewards may reduce incentives for teachers to collaborate and, as a consequence, reduce rather than increase school performance, or the team dynamic between teachers and with administrators can be damaged
– Particularly when incentives are awarded in a ‘zero-sum’ game– Team incentives may work well in small teams where
there is mutual monitoring coupled with an easy information flow among team members and options for teachers to reciprocate among each other
Determining the ‘right amounts’– Performance bonuses that are a fraction of what they are
in private industry cannot be expected to produce the same results
– Avoiding that bonuses distort outcomes .
25252525M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Design of incentive systems Limited empirical evidence Lots of initiatives short-lived Some of the more successful examples
started with…… Defining a set of standards for teacher
performance together with measurement systems for teacher performance that both teachers and administrators agree will fairly evaluate teachers against the standards
… Group-based systems based on teachers’ knowledge and skills .
26262626M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli Criteria for salary decisions
Teacher qualification areas Labour-market situation
– In regions or subjects with acute shortages salaries can be higher
Teacher performance– Pay rises linked to performance
Range of responsibilities Evaluation
Local authorities and unions run joint Council to determine long-term effectiveness of the system
Each group is conducting its own evaluation
Swedish system of individualised school-based pay introduced in 1996
27272727M
exi
co 1
1-1
2 D
ece
mb
er2
00
8In
cent
ives
and
stim
uli
Thank you !Thank you !
www.oecd.org
Email: [email protected]
…and remember:
Without data, you are just another person with an opinion