www.iap.uni-jena.de

Metrology and Sensing

Lecture 6: Interferometry II

2016-11-22

Ralf Hambach / Herbert Gross

Winter term 2016

2

Preliminary Schedule

No Date Subject Detailed Content

1 18.10. Introduction Introduction, optical measurements, shape measurements, errors,

definition of the meter, sampling theorem

2 19.10. Wave optics (ACP) Basics, polarization, wave aberrations, PSF, OTF

3 01.11. Sensors Introduction, basic properties, CCDs, filtering, noise

4 08.11. Fringe projection Moire principle, illumination coding, fringe projection, deflectometry

5 09.11. Interferometry I (ACP) Introduction, interference, types of interferometers, miscellaneous

6 22.11. Interferometry II Examples, interferogram interpretation, fringe evaluation methods

7 29.11. Wavefront sensors Hartmann-Shack WFS, Hartmann method, miscellaneous methods

8 06.12. Geometrical methods Tactile measurement, photogrammetry, triangulation, time of flight,

Scheimpflug setup

9 13.12. Speckle methods Spatial and temporal coherence, speckle, properties, speckle metrology

10 20.12. Holography Introduction, holographic interferometry, applications, miscellaneous

11 03.01. Measurement of basic

system properties Bssic properties, knife edge, slit scan, MTF measurement

12 10.01. Phase retrieval Introduction, algorithms, practical aspects, accuracy

13 17.01. Metrology of aspheres

and freeforms Aspheres, null lens tests, CGH method, freeforms, metrology of freeforms

14 24.01. OCT Principle of OCT, tissue optics, Fourier domain OCT, miscellaneous

15 31.01. Confocal sensors Principle, resolution and PSF, microscopy, chromatical confocal method

3

Content

Interferogram examples

Interpretation of interferograms

Fringe evaluation methods

Interferograms of Primary Aberrations

Spherical aberration 1

-1 -0.5 0 +0.5 +1

Defocussing in

Astigmatism 1

Coma 1

4

Real Measured Interferogram

Problems in real world measurement:

Edge effects

Definition of boundary

Perturbation by coherent

stray light

Local surface error are not

well described by Zernike

expansion

Convolution with motion blur

Ref: B. Dörband

5

Interferogram - Definition of Boundary

Critical definition of the interferogram boundary and the Zernike normalization

radius in reality

6

Interferometry

Color fringes of a broadband interfergram

Ref: B. Dörband

Shearing Interferograms

Typical shearing interferograms

of some simple aberrations

d

xz

2

Interpretation of Interferograms

xd

Distance between fringes: d

Bending of fringes: x

Relation of surface error z

accross diameter

Intensity of fringes

I(x,y,t) intensity of fringes

V(x,y) contrast of pattern

W(x,y) phase function to be found

j(x,y,t) reference phase

Rs(x,y) multiplicative speckle noise

IR(x,y,t) additive noise

Tracing of fringes:

- time consuming method, interpolation, indexing of fringes, missing lines

Fourier method:

-wavelet method

- FFT Method

- gradient method

- fit of modal functions

Evaluation of Fringes

),,(),(),,(),(cos),(1),(),,( 0 tyxIyxRtyxyxWyxVyxItyxI RS j

11

Interferometry

General description of the measurement quantity:

superpostion of spatially modulated signal and noise

Io: basic intensity, source

T: transmission of the system, including speckle

j: phase, to be found

IN: noise, sensor, electronics, digitization

Signal processing, SNR improvement:

- filtering

- background subtraction

Ref: W. Osten

0( , ) ( , ) ( , ) cos ( , ) ( , )NI x y I x y T x y x y I x yj

original signal

filtered signal

background

processed signal

12

Interferometry

perfect interferogram

reduced contrast due

to background intensity

with speckle

with noise

Ref: W. Osten

Basic configuration

Test surface rotated by 180°

Cats eye configuration

Calibration

plane

mirror

1. Basic configuration

2. Surface rotated by 180°

3. Cats eye position

surface

under test

condenser

1 Re( , ) ( , ) ( , ) 2 ( , )f KondW x y W x y W x y S x y

2 Re( , ) ( , ) ( , ) 2 ( , )f KondW x y W x y W x y S x y

3 Re

( , ) ( , )( , ) ( , )

2

Kond Kondf

W x y W x yW x y W x y

1 2 3 3

1( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )

4S x y W x y W x y W x y W x y

Absolute Calibration of Interferometer

14

Fringe Evaluation

1. Fringe Tracking

2. Fourier-Transform Method

3. Spatial Phase Shifting

4. Phase Sampling Technique

5. Heterodyne Technique

6. Phase-Locking Method

7. Ellipse-Fitting Technique

Ref: R. Kowarschik

15

Evaluation of Fringe Pattern

Ref: R. Kowarschik

Static Methods Dynamic Methods

Fringe Tracking Phase Shifting Methods

Fourier-Transform Heterodyne Technique

Spatial-Carrier Frequency Phase-Locking Method

Spatial Phase Shifting

+ Only 1 interferogram Very variable + No specific components Accuracy better /100

- Difficult to automatize Calibration

- Accuracy below /100 Additional components

16

Evaluation of Fringe Pattern

Ref: R. Kowarschik

Static Methods Dynamic Methods

Fringe Tracking Phase Shifting Methods

Fourier-Transform Heterodyne Technique

Spatial-Carrier Frequency Phase-Locking Method

Spatial Phase Shifting

+ Only 1 interferogram Very variable + No specific components Accuracy better /100

- Difficult to automatize Calibration

- Accuracy below /100 Additional components

17

Fringe Tracking for Fringe Evaluation

Ref: R. Kowarschik

Fringe Tracking (fringe skeletonizing)

- Intensity distribution 1. Identification of local extrema

2. Fringe sampling points for interpolation

- determination of points with integer or half-integer order of interference

- absolute order has to be identified additionally

- relatively low accuracy of phase measurements

Processing:

- improvement of SNR by spatial and temporal filtering

- creation of the skeleton (segmentation)

- Improvement of the skeleton shape

- numbering the fringes

- reconstruction of the phase by interpolation

18

Fringe Tracking for Fringe Evaluation

Skeletonizing method

Ref: W. Osten

interferogram segmentation

improved

segment skeleton

phase map

Method of carrier frequency

- tilt creates carrier frequency

- essential signal: deviation from linearity

Evaluation in frequency space:

carrier frequency eliminated by filtering of the Fourtier method

Carrier Method of Fringe Evaluation

20

Fourier Method of Fringe Evaluation

Intensity in interferogram

Substitution

gives

Fourier transform

interpretation:

A: low frequencies, background

C, C* : same information

Filtering with bandpass:

elimination of A and C*:

Inverse Fourier transform

Pointwise calculation of phase

Unwrapping of the phase for 2

for a smooth surface

Ref: W. Osten

( , ) ( , ) ( , ) cos ( , )I x y a x y b x y x y

( , )1( , ) ( , )

2

i x yc x y b x y e

*( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )I x y a x y c x y c x y

*J( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )A C C

J( , ) ( , )C

( , )1( , ) ( , ) ( , ) ( , )

2

i x yI x y F J c x y b x y e

Im ( , )( , )

Re ( , )

c x yx y

c x y

Fourier method:

- representation in frequency domain

- A: noise

- filtering of noise and asymmetrical contribution

Phase information

),(),(),(),( * vuCvuCvuAvuI

),(Re

),(Imarctan

yxC

yxCj

| I(u,v) |

spatial

frequency

u

A(u,v)

C (u,v)* C (u,v)

filter-

function

H(u,v)

Fourier Method of Fringe Evaluation

22

Fourier Method of Fringe Evaluation

Fourier method

Ref: W. Osten

interferogram amplitude filtered amplitude

wrapped phase phase mapunwrapped phase

23

Carrier Method of Fringe Evaluation

Ref: W. Osten

interferogram

interferogram

with carrier

amplitude

spectrum

spectrum filtered

and shifted

unwrapped

phaseunwrapped phase

24

Carrier Method of Fringe Evaluation

Fourier spatial demodulation technique

Overlay of carrier frequency

Filtering of the spectrum: only one order

Inverse transform

Ref: G. Kaufmann

Interferogram Interferogram with carrier spectrum reconstructed phase

25

Phase Sampling

Diversification

Various possibilities for changes

Ref: R. Kowarschik

Phase shifting method TPMI

( temporal phase measuring interferometry )

- additional phase term a

- three different phases aj sequencially

measured (at least 3)

- elimination of phase values

background

contrast

- alternatively 4 frame method

- more phase values increase accuracy

aj ),(cos),(),(),( yxyxbyxayxI

3/2/13/2/1 cos aj baI

321231132

321231132

sinsinsin

coscoscosarctan

aaa

aaaj

IIIIII

IIIIII

2

3,,

2,0 4321

aa

aa

31

24arctanII

II

j

Phase Shifting Method of Fringe Evaluation

2 2

1 3 2 4

0

1

2C I I I I

I

1,4

1

4B j

j

I I

27

Phase Shifting

Errors of phase shifting, calibration:

- Nonlinearities of the detector

- Modulo 2

- Other systematic errors

- non-ideal reference surfaces

- aberrations of optical elements

- diffraction, ghosts

- digitization

- air turbulence

- mechanical vibrations

- detector noise

- frequency shift

Ref: R. Kowarschik

TPMI method variants

- 3-frame

- 4-frame

- 5-frame

Carre method:

- only phase differences essential

- higher accuracy

Comparison of accuracies:

larger number of frames is

more precise

PV-phase

error in

phase

error

a

0.05

10

in %

200-10-20

0.015-Frame

3- , 4-Frame

Carre

Phase Sifting Method

29

Phase Shifting Method for Fringe Evaluation

Ref: W. Osten

I2(90)

unwrapped

phase

I4(270)

I3(180) I1(0)

wrapped phase