METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    1/22

    METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE

    STRUCTURES

    SEMINAR REPORT

    A report of the seminar presented in

    partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of

    Bachelor of Technology in

    CIVIL ENGINEERING

    by the University of Kerala

    Submitted by

    Seventh semester

    Department of Civil Engineering

    Muslim Association College of Engineering

    Venjaramoodu-695607

    Kerala2013

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    2/22

    DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

    MUSLIM ASSOCIATION COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

    VENJARAMOODU-695607, KERALA

    CERTIFICATE

    This is to certify that the seminar report entitled

    METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES is a bonafide

    record of the seminar presented by XXX towards partial fulfillment of the

    requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Technology in Civil

    Engineering by the University of Kerala.

    Guided by Head of the department

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    3/22

    ABSTRACT

    There are three basic symptoms of distress in a concrete structure: cracking,

    spalling and disintegration. Each of these basic symptoms in itself is fairly obvious

    and may be readily detected and differentiated from the others. Cracking is one of the

    most misunderstood problems of concrete. It is generally regarded as indicative of

    defective design or materials. Methods of repairing cracks include bonding with

    epoxies, routing and sealing, stitching, external stressing, grouting, blanketing, use of

    overlays, etc. Repairing cracks does not usually involve strengthening. In a structure

    showing spalling and disintegration, it is usual to find that there have been substantial

    losses of section and/or pronounced corrosion of reinforcement. Hence, the repair

    involves some requirement for restoration of lost strength. The principal methods used

    for repair of spalling and disintegration are jacketing, guniting, prepacked concrete,

    drypack, replacement of the concrete, and the application of overlays of several types.

    This paper gives a detailed description on all the above methods used for repairing

    cracks, spalling and disintegration in concrete structures.

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    4/22

    CONTENTS

    SI No TITLE Page No

    List of Figures

    1 INTRODUCTION 1

    2 REPAIRING CRACKS 1

    2.1 Types of Cracks 2

    2.2 Methods of Repairing Cracks 3

    2.3 Bonding with Epoxies 3

    2.4 Routing and Sealing 4

    2.5 Stitching 5

    2.6 External Stressing 7

    2.7 Grouting 7

    2.8 Blanketing 8

    2.9 Use of Overlays 10

    3 REPAIRING SPALLING AND 10DISINTEGRATION

    3.1 Jacketing 11

    3.2 Guniting 12

    3.3 Prepacked Concrete 14

    3.4 Drypack 14

    3.5 Replacement of Concrete 15

    3.6 Overlays 15

    4 CONCLUSION 16

    5 REFERENCE 17

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    5/22

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure No Title Page No

    1 Tell Tales 2

    2 Routing and sealing 5

    3 Stitching 5

    4 External Stressing 7

    5 Types of chase 9

    6 Sealed Chase 10

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    6/22

    1

    1. INTRODUCTIONConcrete structures will show the degree of deterioration in the form of

    cracking, spalling and disintegration. Each one of these is clearly distinguishable. The

    reasons for their development may be poor materials, poor design poor construction

    practice, poor supervision or a combination. Crack formation in concrete is most

    interesting because sometimes the same causes produce a different cracking pattern,

    and sometimes the same cracking pattern is produced by different causes. Sometimes

    concrete cracks in a location where no cause can be found out, and in other places it

    does not crack where there is every reason for cracks to occur. However, fifty percent

    of the cases are straight forward.Cracks in themselves are seldom indicative of structural danger; accordingly,

    repair usually does not involve strengthening. So their repairs are basically intended

    to seal the cracks against an objectionable flow of water or to improve the appearance

    of the construction. In the repair of a structure showing spalling and disintegration, it

    is usual to find that there have been substantial losses of section and/or pronounced

    corrosion of the reinforcement. Both are matters of concern from a structural

    viewpoint, and repair generally involves some urgency and some requirement for

    restoration of lost strength.

    2. REPAIRING CRACKS

    In order to determine whether the cracks are active or dormant, periodic

    observations are done utilizing various types of telltales [Fig.1]. Crack movement can

    be detected by placing a mark at the end of the crack. Subsequent extension of the

    crack beyond the mark indicates probable continuance of the activity that produced

    the defect originally. The deficiency of this technique is that it will not show any

    tendency for the crack to close or provide any quantitative data on the movement.

    In another method, a pin or a toothpick is lightly wedged into the crack and it

    falls out if there is any extension of the defect. The deficiencies of this method, as

    before, are that there is no indication of closing movement or any quantitative

    measure of the changes, which occur.

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    7/22

    2

    A strip of notched tape works similarly. Movement is indicated by tearing of

    the tape. An advantage in this case is that some indication of closure can be realized

    by observing any wrinkling of the tape. However, this device is not reliable. The tape

    is not dimensionally stable under changing conditions of humidity, so that one can

    never be sure whether the movements are real or are due to shrinkage or swelling of

    the marker.

    The device using a typical vernier caliper is the most satisfactory of all. Both

    extension and compression are indicated and movements of about one-hundredth of

    an inch can be measured using a vernier caliper of special type. If more accurate

    readings are desired, extensometers can be used. The reference points must be rigidly

    constructed and carefully glued to the surface of concrete, using a carborandum stone

    to prepare the bonding surface before attaching the reference marks.

    Where extreme accuracy is required resistance strain gauges can be glued

    across the crack. They are, however, expensive, sensitive to changes in humidity, and

    easily damaged.

    Fig 1 Tell Tales

    2.1 TYPES OF CRACKS

    Cracks can be divided into active cracks and dormant cracks. It should be

    considered that, in a sense, every crack is an active one. For example, if there is any

    change in the load supported by a member, whether an increase or a decrease, the

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    8/22

    3

    member must deform to accommodate the change. In this case, deformation is bound

    to occur and be concentrated at the points of weakness, i.e. at the cracks. Thus, the

    proper differentiation between active and dormant cracks is one of magnitude of

    movement, and the telltales are a measure of the difference. If the magnitude of the

    movement, measured over a reasonable period of time (say 6 months or 1 year), is

    sufficient to displace or show significantly on the telltales, we can treat the crack as an

    active one. If the movements are smaller, the crack may be considered as dormant.

    Cracks can also be divided into solitary or isolated cracks and pattern cracks.

    Generally, a solitary crack is due to a positive overstressing of the concrete either due

    to load or shrinkage. The cause for this will become apparent when the line of the

    crack is compared with the layout of the portion of the concrete, its reinforcement and

    the known stresses in it. Overload cracks are fairly easily identified because they

    follow the lines demonstrated in laboratory load tests. A crack due to setting and

    hardening shrinkage is formed in the first week of the life of the concrete. If the

    length of concrete under inspection is more than about 9 m, it is not likely that there is

    a solitary crack; usually there will be another of a similar type. The analysis of this

    second crack confirms the findings from the first. In a long retaining wall or long

    channel, the regular formation of cracks indicates faults in the design rather than the

    construction, but an irregular distribution of Solitary cracks may indicate poor

    construction as well as poor design.

    Regular patterns of cracks may occur in the surfacing of concrete and in thin

    slabs. These are called pattern cracks. The term pattern cracking is used to indicate

    that all the cracks visible have occurred more or less at the same time.

    2.2 METHODS OF REPAIRING CRACKS

    Methods of repairing cracks include bonding with epoxies, routing and

    sealing, stitching, external stressing, grouting, blanketing, use of overlays, etc.

    Various factors are to be considered in deciding the type of repair to be carried out.

    The details of these methods are described in the next sections.

    2.3 BONDING WITH EPOXIES

    Cracks in concrete may be bonded by the injection of epoxy bonding

    compounds under pressure. Usual practice is to drill into the crack from the face of

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    9/22

    4

    the concrete at several locations; inject water or a solvent to flush out the defect;

    allow the surface to dry (using a hot air jet, if needed); surface-sea the cracks between

    the injection points; and inject the epoxy until it flows out of the adjacent sections of

    the crack or begins to bulge out the surface seals, just as in pressure grouting. Usually

    the epoxy is injected through holes of about % inch in diameter and % inch deep

    at 6 to 12 inches centers. Smaller spacing is used for finer cracks. The limitation of

    this method is that unless the crack is dormant or the cause of cracking is removed

    and thereby the crack is made dormant, it will probably recur, possibly somewhere

    else in the structure. Also, this technique is not applicable if the defects are actively

    leaking to the extent that they cannot be dried out, or where the cracks are numerous.

    2.4 ROUTING AND SEALING

    This method involves enlarging the crack along its exposed face and filling

    and sealing it with a suitable material [Fig.2]. This is the most simple and common

    technique for sealing cracks and is applicable for sealing both fine pattern cracks and

    larger isolated cracks. The cracks should be dormant. This technique is not applicable

    for sealing cracks subject to a pronounced hydrostatic pressure. The routing operation

    consists of following along the crack with a concrete saw or with hand or pneumatic

    tools, opening the crack sufficiently to receive the sealant. A minimum surface width

    of % inch is desirable. Smaller openings are difficult to work with. The surfaces of the

    routed joint should be rinsed clean and permitted to dry before placing the sealant.

    The method used for placing the sealant depends on the material to be used and

    follows standard techniques. Routing and sealing of leaking cracks should preferably

    done on the pressure face so that the water or other aggressive agents cannot penetrate

    the interior of the concrete and cause side effects such as swelling, chemical attack, or

    corrosion of the reinforcement. The sealant may be any of the several materials,

    depending on how tight or permanent seal is desired. This is a method where thorough

    water tightness of the joint is not required and where appearance is not important.

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    10/22

    5

    Fig 2 Routing and sealing

    2.5 STITCHING

    Fig 3 Stitching

    The tensile strength of a cracked concrete section can be restored by stitching

    in a manner analogous to sewing cloth. Concrete can be stitched by iron or steel dogs

    in the same way as timber. A series of stitches of different lengths should be used so

    that they do not all exert their load in one line at the side of the crack. The best

    method of stitching is to bend bars into the shape of a broad flat bottomed letter U

    between 1 foot and 3 feet long and with ends about 6 inches long, and to insert them

    in holes drilled to match in the concrete on either side of the crack. The bars are then

    grouted up, some grout being placed in the holes in advance of the bars. Fig.1 shows

    the details of stitching.

    Usually cracks start at one end and run away from the starting place quicker

    on one side of the concrete than on the other. The stitching should be on the side,

    which is opening up first. The following points should be observed in general. Any

    desired degree of strengthening can be accomplished, but it must be considered that

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    11/22

    6

    the strengthening also tends to stiffen the structure locally. This may give more force

    to the restraints causing the cracking and reactivate the condition.

    Stitching the crack will tend to cause the problem to migrate elsewhere in the

    structure. If it is decided to stitch, investigate and, if necessary, strengthen adjacent

    areas of the construction to take the additional stress. In particular, the stitching dogs

    should be of variable length and/or orientation and so located that the tension

    transmitted across the crack does not devolve on a single plane of th section, but is

    spread out over an area.

    Where there is a water problem, the crack should be sealed as well as stitched

    so that the stitches are not corroded, and because the stitching itself will not seal the

    crack. Sealing should be completed before stitching is commenced, to avoid the

    corrosion and also because the presence of dogs tends to make it difficult to apply the

    sealant.

    Where possible, stitch both sides of the concrete section so that further

    movements of the structure will not exert any bending action on the dogs. In bending

    members, it is possible to stitch one side of the crack only, but this should be the

    tension side of the section, where movement is originating. If the member is in thestate of axial tension, then a symmetrical placement of the dogs is a must, even if

    excavation or demolition is required to gain access to opposing sides of the section.

    In order to resist shear along the crack, it is necessary to use diagonal

    stitching. One set of dogs can be placed on each side of the concrete, if necessary. The

    lengths of dogs are random so that the anchor points do not form a plane of weakness.

    The dogs must be grouted with a non-shrink or expanding mortar, so that they have a

    tight fit, and movement of the crack will cause simultaneous stressing of both old and

    new sections. If this is not possible, proportion the stitching to take the entire load

    without participation by the existing materials [Fig.3].

    The dogs are relatively thin and long and so cannot take much in the way of

    compressive force. Accordingly, if there is a tendency for the crack to close as well as

    to open, the dogs must be stiffened and strengthened by encasement in an overlay or

    by some similar means.

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    12/22

    7

    2.6 EXTERNAL STRESSING

    Fig 4 External Stressing

    Development of cracking in concrete is due to tensile stress and can be

    arrested by removing these stresses. Further, the cracks can be closed by inducing a

    compressive force, sufficient to overcome the tension and to provide a residual

    compression. This compressive force is applied by use of the usual prestressing wiresor rods. The principle is very similar to stitching, except that the stitches are

    tensioned; rather than plain bar dogs which apply no closing force to the crack and

    which may in fact have to permit the crack to open up a bit before they begin to take

    the load. All the points noted regarding stitching must be considered [2]. An

    additional problem is that of providing an anchorage for the prestressing wires or

    rods. Some form of abutment is needed for this purpose. The effect of the tensioning

    force on the stress conditions in the structure should be analyzed [Fig4].

    2.7 GROUTING

    Grouting of cracks can be performed in the same manner as the injection of an

    epoxy, and this technique has the same areas of applications and limitations.

    However, the use of an epoxy is the better solution except where the considerations of

    fire resistance or cold weather prevent such use, in which case grouting is the

    comparable alternative. The procedure is similar to other grouting methods and

    consists of cleaning the concrete along the crack; installing built-up seats at intervals

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    13/22

    8

    along the crack, sealing the crack between the seats with a cement paint or grout,

    flushing the crack to clean it and test the seal; and then grouting the whole. The grout

    itself is high early strength Portland cement.

    An alternative and better method, where it can be performed, is to drill down

    the length of the crack and grout it so as to form a key. The grout key functions to

    prevent relative transverse movements of the sections of concrete adjacent to the

    crack. However, this technique is applicable only where the cracks run in a reasonably

    straight line and are accessible at one end. The drilled hole should preferably be 2 or 3

    inches in diameter and flushed to clean out the crack and permit better penetration of

    the grout.

    2.8 BLANKETING

    Blanketing is similar to routing and sealing, but is used on a larger scale and is

    applicable for sealing active as well as dormant cracks. Preparing the chase is the first

    step in blanketing. The chase usually is cut square [Fig.5]. The bottom should be

    chipped as smooth, as level, and as clean as possible to facilitate breaking the bond

    between sealant and concrete. The sides of the chase should be prepared to provide a

    good bond with the sealant material. To this end, they should be dry. All loose,disintegrated, or otherwise unsatisfactory concrete adjacent to the crack should be

    removed, even if the resulting shape is irregular and the volume to be removed is

    large. If the concrete adjacent to the chase is porous, a bond coat of waterproof

    mortar, laid on the sides and bottom of the chase is required. The bond coat must be

    properly dried and cured before proceeding to place the sealant.

    The first consideration in the selection of sealant materials is the amount of

    movement anticipated and the extremes of temperature at which such movements will

    occur. It must be capable of deforming the required amount under the applicable

    conditions of temperature. The material should be able to take traffic, be resistant to

    chemical spillage, and be capable of being pigmented, if desired.

    The first type of blanket joints use sealant materials, which are known as

    elastic sealants. They return to their original shape, when not under an externally

    induced stress, i.e. acts elastically. A bond breaker should be used at the bottom of the

    chase, so that the sealant is free to deform. Otherwise, the stress in the top fibres

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    14/22

    9

    would be almost doubled, when compared with what it would be with the bond

    breaker, and the bottom fibres will tend to tear. Good bond breakers include

    polyethylene, waxed paper and foil [Fig.6]. The second type of blanket joints use

    sealant materials that are known as mastic sealants. Their details are similar to that of

    an elastic sealant, except that the bond breaker is omitted and the sealant is bonded to

    the bottom as well as to the sides of the chase. The sealant is a mastic rather than a

    compound having elastic properties. This type of joint is for use where the anticipated

    movements are small and where trafficability or appearance are not considerations.

    The advantage is that the mastic is less costly than the elastic type of sealant material.

    The third type of blanket joints are called mortar-plugged joints. They are used

    in cases where the joint must resist a pressure head acting on the face of the plug. The

    mortar plug provides the strength of the joint, and resists the pressure on the joint by

    arching the load to the sides of the chase. Theoretically, the edges of the chase should

    be undercut so that the mortar plug, which dries more quickly and more thoroughly at

    the surface, does not shrink differentially and so pull away from the sides and bottom

    of the chase.

    Whatever be the type of detail used, when cutting the chase, it is probable that

    the reinforcement will be exposed. If this is the case, cut deep enough so that the

    sealant will be behind the reinforcing, clean the bars, and paint them with bitumen as

    a protection against moisture penetration and corrosion. If the crack is an active one

    with substantial movements, cut the bars so that they do not impede the movement of

    the joint. In any event, the reinforcement should not be left in a position where it is

    partly embedded in two different matrices. For example, it should not be partly in the

    mortar plug and partly in the sealant, or partly in the joint and partly in the original

    concrete.

    Fig 5 Types of chase

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    15/22

    10

    Fig 6 Sealed chase

    2.9 USE OF OVERLAYS

    Overlays may be used to seal the cracks and they are very useful and desirable

    where there are large numbers of cracks and treatment of each individual defect

    would be too expensive. Sealing of an active crack by use of an overlay requires that

    the overlay be extensible and not flexible alone. The occurrence of prolongation of a

    crack automatically means that there has been an elongation of the surface fibers of

    the concrete. Accordingly, an overlay which is flexible but not extensible, i.e. can be

    bent but cannot be stretched, will not seal a crack that is active.

    A two- or three- ply membrane of roofing felt laid in a mop coat of tar, with

    tar between the plies, the whole covered with a protective course of gravel, concrete

    or brick, functions very well for this purpose. The type of protective course depends

    on the use to which it will be subjected. Gravel is typically used for roofs, concrete or

    brick are used where fill is to be placed against the overlay. An asphalt block

    pavement also works well where the area is subjected to heavy traffic.

    3. REPAIRING SPALLING AND DISINTEGRATION

    Cracks in themselves are seldom indicative of structural danger; accordingly,

    repair usually does not involve strengthening. So their repairs are basically intended

    to seal the cracks against an objectionable flow of water or to improve the appearance

    of the construction. In the repair of a structure showing spalling and disintegration, it

    is usual to find that there have been substantial losses of section and/or pronounced

    corrosion of the reinforcement. Both are matters of concern from a structural

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    16/22

    11

    viewpoint, and repair generally involves some urgency and some requirement for

    restoration of lost strength [5]. The principal methods used for repair of spalling and

    disintegration are jacketing, guniting, prepacked concrete, drypack, replacement of

    concrete, use of various types of overlays etc.

    3.1 JACKETING

    The use of jacketing is primarily applicable to the repair of deteriorated

    columns, piers and piles. It is especially useful where all or a portion of the section to

    be repaired is under water. Jacketing consists of restoring or increasing the section of

    an existing member, principally a compression member, by encasement in new

    concrete. This method is applicable for protecting a section against further

    deterioration as well as strengthening. The form for the jacket should be provided

    with spacers to assure clearance between it and the existing concrete surface. The

    form may be temporary or permanent and may consist of timber, wrought iron,

    precast concrete or gauge metal, depending on the purpose and exposure. For marine

    environments or elsewhere where it is desired to protect concrete from chemical

    reaction with its environment or from weathering, the use of permanent timber forms

    is recommended; provided the appearance of the form is not objectionable and does

    not constitute a fire hazard. Wrought iron makes a very satisfactory, permanent form,

    but is expensive and so is limited to installations where the additional cost is justified

    by the increased life of the repair or where it is desired to protect the concrete from

    severe abrasion, such as due to heavy masses of moving ice. Gauge metal and other

    temporary forms can also be used under certain conditions.

    Filling up the forms can be done by pumping the grout, by using pre packed

    concrete, by using a tremie, or, for subaqueous works, by dewatering the form and

    placing the concrete in the dry. Filling the form by pumping the grout, offers an

    advantage compared to others, because reliable results can be obtained with less

    dependence upon the skill of workmen. The use of a grout having a cement sand ratio

    by volume, between 1:2 and 1:3, is recommended. The richer grout is preferred for

    thinner sections and the leaner mixture for heavier sections. The grout should be

    placed as soon as possible after the rinsing operation and under an air pressure,

    sufficient to assure a smooth and continuous flow. The forms should be filled to

    overflowing, the grout allowed to settle for about 20 minutes, and the forms refilled to

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    17/22

    12

    overflowing. The outside of the forms should be vibrated during placing of the grout.

    The top of the jacket should be finished with a collar of concrete in such a manner

    that a smooth transition between repaired and existing work will result.

    3.2 GUNITING

    Gunite is also known as shotcrete or pneumatically applied mortar. Gunite is

    used for the restoration of concrete surfaces where the deterioration is relatively

    shallow. It can be used on vertical and overhead, as well as on horizontal surfaces and

    is particularly useful for restoring surfaces spa lied due to corrosion of reinforcement.

    Gunite is a mixture of Portland cement, sand and water, shot into the place by

    compressed air. In structural applications, the sand and cement are mixed dry in a

    mixing chamber, and the dry mixture is then transferred by air pressure along a pipe

    or hose to a nozzle, where it is forcibly projected on to the surface to be coated. Water

    is added to the mixture by passing it through a spray injected at the nozzle. The flow

    of water at the nozzle can be controlled to give a mix of desired stiffness, which will

    adhere to the surface against which it is projected.

    The existing surface must be made rough to afford a good keying effect.

    Anchor bolts tying the new work to the old concrete are essential. A layer ofgalvanized welded wire mesh can also be provided. The mesh is connected to the

    hook bolts and the existing reinforcing bars, with galvanized tie wire. Incompatibility

    of gunite with the old concrete is a major problem, and the keying effects of the rough

    surface and the doweling effects of the anchor bolts are necessary to assure interaction

    between the two materials.

    Sand for gunite should be uniformly graded, as for conventional concrete.

    Hard particles are desirable, since there is a tendency to grind and crumble the grains

    as they pass through the discharge hose. The sand should contain 3 to 5 percent

    moisture for efficient operation of the equipment. Because of impact, a certain amount

    of the material being projected against the surface to be coated will bounce off. This

    material is known as rebound. It consists primarily of the coarse sand particles and

    has a much smaller cement content than the mix, as projected from the nozzle. The

    occurrence of some rebound is unavoidable, and it amounts to 20 to 30 percent.

    Because of the rebound, the cement content of the mortar, in place, will be

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    18/22

    13

    substantially greater than that of the materials as fed to the mixer. Thus, if a 1:3 mix is

    desired in place, a 1:4 mix fed into the mixer might be adequately rich.

    It is difficult to mention mix proportions for gunite because of uncertainties

    and variations in the amount of rebound, because of difficulties in making test

    cylinders, and because there is little control over the water-cement ratio of the

    material in place. In practice, it is usual to use as much water as possible without

    causing fallouts, as this minimizes the rebound. Roughly, this might mean a water

    cement ratio of 0.5 to 0.6. Starting with this assumption and assuming a 20 to 30

    percent rebound, the proportions required for the mix, as fed to the mixer, can be

    approximated for any desired strength. In practice, a 1:3 or 1:3.5 mix, by volume, is

    fed into the mixer.

    The sand and cement shall be thoroughly mixed in dry state. The time of

    mixing shall not be less than 1.5 minutes. The nozzle shall be held between 2ft and 4ft

    from the surface to be coated, and held in such a position that the flow of material will

    strike it as near to a right angle as possible. In shooting vertical or sloped surfaces, the

    placing shall be started at the bottom and carried up. In such cases, the mortar shall be

    placed in layers of such thickness that the weight of the plastic mass does not cause it

    to sag. When more than one layer is to be used to complete the final thickness of the

    work, the delay between applications of successive layers shall be ample to prevent

    sagging or fallout of the mass, but not so long that the underlying layer has

    completely set and developed a glaze coating. It is observed that 30 minutes to 1 hour

    is usually a proper interval.

    Before any gunite is applied, care shall be taken to remove any sand or

    rebound clinging to the surfaces. No gunite shall be applied to a surface on which

    there is running or free water. When shooting around reinforcing bars or anchor bolts,

    the nozzle shall be moved from side to side and angled to place the gunite back of the

    rod. At the end of the day's work, or at similar stopping periods, the gunite shall be

    tapered to a thin edge. Before shooting the adjacent section, this tapered portion shall

    be thoroughly cleaned and wetted. Operations shall be suspended when wind velocity

    is such that it blows away the spray from the nozzle and prevents proper control of the

    consistency. As soon as dry patches begin to appear on the surface of the newly

    placed mortar, curing by use of a water spray or application of two coats of an

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    19/22

    14

    approved sealing compound shall be commenced. Minimum curing period shall be 7

    days.

    3.3 PREPACKED CONCRETE

    This method is particularly useful for carrying out the repair under water and

    elsewhere where accessibility is a problem. Prepacked concrete is made by filling

    forms with coarse aggregate and then filling the voids of the aggregate by pumping in

    a sand cement grout. As the grout is pumped into the forms, it will fill the voids,

    displacing any water in them, and form a concrete mass.

    Prepacked concrete is used for refacing of structures, jacketing, filling of

    cavities in and under structures, and underpinning and enlarging piers, abutments,

    retaining walls and footings. The coarse aggregate used should be carefully selected

    and must be clean. The void content of the aggregate mass should be minimized to

    reduce the required volume of the more costly grout. In normal practice, the voids

    ratio ranges from 35 to 45 percent. The intruded mortar contains fine sand, Portlandcement, a pozzolanic material of low mixing-water requirement, an agent designed to

    increase fluidity and to inhibit early stiffening of the grout, and mixing water.

    The forms must constitute a closed, watertight system, vented at the top only.

    If not watertight, the travel of grout cannot be controlled. If not effectively vented, a

    back-pressure will be created, with the result that the concrete fill may contain voids.

    Pumping of mortar should commence at the lowest point and proceed upward. The

    grout pipes should not be more than 5ft on centers, and the grout level in the mass

    should be brought up uniformly, as determined by observations of grout levels in the

    grout pipes. Placing of grout should be a smooth, uninterrupted operation.

    3.4 DRYPACK

    Drypacking is the hand placement of a very dry mortar and the subsequent

    tamping of the mortar into place, producing an intimate contact between the new and

    existing works. Because of the low water-cement ratio of the material, there is littleshrinkage, and the patch remains tight. So it will be of good quality with respect to

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    20/22

    15

    durability, strength and water tightness. Drypacking is used for filling small, relatively

    deep holes, such as those resulting from the removal of form ties, and narrow slots cut

    for repair of cracks. The usual mortar mix is 1:2.5 to 1:3.

    3.5 REPLACEMENT OF CONCRETE

    This method consists of replacing the defective concrete with new concrete of

    conventional proportions, placed in a conventional manner. This method is a

    satisfactory and economical solution where the repair occurs in depth (at least beyond

    the reinforcement), and where the area to be repaired is accessible. This method is

    particularly indicated where a water-tight construction is required and where the

    deterioration extends completely through the original concrete section.

    3.6 OVERLAYS

    In addition to seal cracks, an overlay may also be used to restore a spalled or

    disintegrated surface. Overlays used include mortar, bituminous compounds, and

    epoxies. They should be bonded to the existing concrete surface.

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    21/22

    16

    4. CONCLUSION

    When repairing cracks, do not fill the crack with new concrete or mortar. A

    brittle overlay should not be used to seal an active crack. The restraints causing the

    cracks should be relieved, or otherwise the repair must be capable of accommodating

    future movements. Cracks should not be surface-sealed over corroded reinforcement,

    without encasing the bars. The methods adopted for repairing spalling and

    disintegration must be capable of restoring the lost strength.

  • 8/12/2019 METHODS OF REPAIRING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

    22/22

    17

    5. REFERENCES

    1. Champion, S. Failure and Repair of Concrete Structures. John Wiley &Sons Inc. New York, 1961.

    2. Sidney M. Johnson. Deterioration, Maintenance and Repair of Structures.Mc Graw-Hill Book Company. New York, 1965.

    3. Lee How Son and George C.S. Yuen. Building Maintenance Technology.Macmillan Distribution Ltd. England. 1993.

    4. Thomas H. McKaig. Building Failures. Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.New York, 1962.

    5.

    Jagadish, R. Structural Failures - Case Histories. Oxford & IBH PublishingCo. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.1995.