22
Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot David Sills 1 , Neil Taylor 2 , Craig Smith 3 , Geoff Strong 4 and John Hanesiak 5 1 Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON 2 Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab, Environment Canada, Edmonton, AB 3 Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, SK 4 University of Alberta (Adjunct), Edmonton, AB 5 University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB 2009 CMOS Congress 31 May – 4 June, Halifax, NS

Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

  • Upload
    bethan

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot. David Sills 1 , Neil Taylor 2 , Craig Smith 3 , Geoff Strong 4 and John Hanesiak 5 1 Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON 2 Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab, Environment Canada, Edmonton, AB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

David Sills1, Neil Taylor2, Craig Smith3,

Geoff Strong4 and John Hanesiak5

1Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Research Section, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON2Hydrometeorology and Arctic Lab, Environment Canada, Edmonton, AB3Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, SK4University of Alberta (Adjunct), Edmonton, AB5University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB

2009 CMOS Congress31 May – 4 June, Halifax, NS

Page 2: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Outline

• Mesonet Rationale• Instrument details• Observation Period and

Methodology• Data Status• Preliminary Analysis

– Fixed mesonet data– Mobile mesonet data

• Plans for Full Experiment• Summary

Page 3: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Rationale• Various severe weather studies have stressed the importance

of mesoscale convergence boundaries and boundary-layer water vapour in thunderstorm development

• Such boundaries and boundary-layer processes cannot be adequately resolved using existing synoptic-scale surface and upper-air observation networks on the Canadian Prairies

• Surface mesonet with high spatial (~10 km) and temporal (2 s to 1 min) resolution need to resolve important boundary-layer processes important for convective initiation and severe storm development

• Mobile observations needed to measure gradients and fill holes in / across mesonet on an ‘as-needed’ basis

Page 4: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Observation PeriodsUNSTABLE Study Period• Fixed mesonet stations

and other selected fixed instrumentation from 1 June to 31 August

Intensive Observation Period (IOP)

• 9-23 July 2008• Mobile platforms in full

operation

Page 5: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Mesonet - Fixed Platforms3 x EC/CRD FOPEX Stations

1 min T, Td, P, wind, pcpn

1 min FastT, FastTd, P, 10m wind, pcpn, deltaT, insolation

FOPEX = Foothills Orographic

Precipitation Experiment

5 x EC/MRD ATMOS StationsATMOS = Automated Transportable

Meteorological Observing System

1 min T, Td, P, wind, pcpn, insolation

3 x ‘full’ UofC FCA Stations

FCA = Foothills Climate Array

Page 6: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Mesonet - Mobile Platforms

UofA Mobile2 / EC Mobile3

2 sec T, Td, P, GPS

2 sec FastT, FastTd, P, GPS, Wind, Compass, Lightning

EC/MRD AMMOS StationsAMMOS = Automated Mobile

Meteorological Observing System

Page 7: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Mesonet• 5 ATMOS stations installed

to create two mesonet lines incorporating existing FOPEX and FCA stations

• High-density line with ~10-15 km spacing in region with highest frequency of CG lightning

• Med-density line with ~15-25 km spacing in region where dryline bulging can occur, storms can affect Calgary

• Allows testing of station placement and spacing

• Two lines used as anchor points for IOD mission measurement strategies

Calgary

Red Deer

Page 8: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Mobile Platform Transects

• Routes predeter-mined given limited road network

• Transects selected at beginning of day depending on the mission for that day

• Preference given for transects with mesonet stations

Page 9: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

FC/URSD

• Data from selected fixed and mobile mesonet platforms were available in real-time to the field coordinator / UNSTABLE RSD

• Mesoanalyses were generated showing current satellite / radar imagery, positions of boundaries

• These assisted FC with positioning of mobile platforms

Page 10: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Data Status

• Have developed suite of interactive quality control programs via MATLAB

• All ATMOS station data have been QCd

• AMMOS data require more attention, QC is underway

• All photographs taken by the AMMOS teams have been QCd (time, location, direction, etc.)

Page 11: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Preliminary Analysis

1) Impact of mesonet stations

2) Characteristics of different boundaries as sampled by AMMOS

Page 12: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Operational Stations Only…

Potential Temp (K)

Page 13: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

With Mesonet Stations…

Potential Temp (K)

Page 14: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Operational Stations Only…

Mixing Ratio (g kg-1)

Page 15: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

With Mesonet Stations…

Mixing Ratio (g kg-1)

Page 16: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

AMMOS Boundary SamplingJuly 9th Dryline + Outflow Boundary

Page 17: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

AMMOS Boundary SamplingJuly 9th Dryline + Outflow Boundary

Mixing ratio gradient = 16.0 g kg-1 km-1

Potential temp gradient = 1.4 K km-1

Boundary width = ~300 m

20 sec

Moving E @ ~60 km/h

Page 18: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

AMMOS Boundary SamplingJuly 13th Dryline Boundary

Mixing ratio gradient = 4.5 g kg-1 km-1

Potential temp gradient = 1.4 K km-1

Boundary width = ~700 m

Moving NE @ ~50 km/h

Page 19: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

AMMOS Boundary SamplingJuly 21st ‘Mystery’ Boundary

Mixing ratio gradient = 5.4 g kg-1 km-1

Potential temp gradient = 0.65 K km-1

Boundary width = ~860 m

Moving S @ ~40 km/h

Page 20: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Plans for Full Experiment (2012?)

• All 10 ATMOS stations (with cell or sat phone communication)

• 1-2 more AMMOS units for mobile met measurements

• Situational awareness software for mobile units and FC (SASSI / VORTEX2)

• Radar at centre of mesonet to detect radar fine lines at convergence zones

Page 21: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Summary

• Mesonet with both fixed and mobile platforms successfully deployed for 2008 pilot study

• Data QC and analysis are underway

• Preliminary indications that dryline gradient is stronger that previously thought

• Planning of mesonet for full UNSTABLE experiment has begun

Page 22: Mesonet Observations during the UNSTABLE 2008 Pilot

Thank you / merci!

D. Sills 2008