58
Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Merit & Promotion Review Training for

Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX

January 2011

Page 2: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Agenda Welcome/Introductions Agenda/Training Agreements/Outcomes Overview of Process New for 2010-2011 PR Dossier

• E-book: walk through thematic guidelines Questions/Wrap-up

Page 3: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Presenters

Academic Personnel UnitKim Rodrigues – Host

Members of AAC – Steve Koike, Chair

Page 4: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

AAC Personnel Committee Work with UC ANR Academic Personnel Unit to

Coordinate the academic merit & promotion process. Assures process is fair and understandable. Facilitates training with UC ANR APU. Nominates Ad hoc review committees. Provides Ad hoc committee chair training. Reviews Ad hoc committee reports for constructive,

mentoring advice that helps an academic improve in the future.

Page 5: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Thank You for Your Support and Expertise:

AAC PC Committee• Mary Bianchi, Dave Campbell, Allan Fulton, Pam Geisel, Janine

Hasey, Gerald Higginbotham, Marilyn Johns, Steve Koike, David Shaw, Dorothy Smith, Scott Stoddard

Academic Personnel Unit• Kim Rodrigues, Executive Director• Andra Strads, Personnel Analyst• Tina Jordan, Personnel Analyst• David White, Personnel Analyst• Pam Tise, Personnel Assistant

Page 6: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Training Agreements Mute phone until you want to speak.

Press *6 to mute and *7 to unmute. Silence cell phones/other noise makers. Do not put call on “hold” (problem with music). May type questions via the chat function on your

computer screen. If you ask questions verbally, state your name

followed by a concise question. One person speak at a time.

Page 7: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

OutcomesIncreased knowledge of new procedures.Understanding of the thematic PR

format.Increased knowledge of how to develop a

well written PR.Answers to your PR questions.

Page 8: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

New UC ANR OrganizationStructure(s) with respect to academic

review process.Peer Review Committee – chaired by

Kim Rodrigues, ED APU – composed of 7 peers:• Chris Greer, John Harper, Janet Hartin, Chuck

Ingels, Shirley Peterson, Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty, Eta Takele

Page 9: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Peer Review Committee

Reviews terms, promotions, accelerations, and upper level merits (Full Title Step VI, VII, VIII and IX) as well as any special cases upon request of the candidate or supervisor.

Page 10: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Peer Review Committee Perspective Your PR is your chance to tell your story. Presentation is important because:

• You want the reviewer to enjoy reading your dossier! • It needs to be easily understood by people in other

programs. Each reviewer has a unique perspective:

Keep in mind the perspectives of those reading your PR: supervisor (e.g. CD), Ad hoc Committee and /or members of Peer Review Committee.

Reviewers may not be familiar with you or your specific program.

Page 11: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Any more questions regarding Peer Review Committee?

Page 12: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Ad hocAd hocs will be streamlined this year to

ensure consistent review for all program areas and expectations for each rank and step.

Two Ad hoc committee(s) have been established to review all promotions from Full Title V to Full Title VI in order to accommodate the large number of cases this cycle.

Page 13: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

APU AAC

Academic Personnel worked with AAC Personnel Committee to make recommendations for the Ad hocs toAVP-P Barbara Allen Diaz. Committees have been confirmed including the one

reviewing Step V to Step VI Promotions.

Page 14: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

CD ReviewAdvisors with CD Assignments

CD’s are reviewed by Bill Frost, Barbara Allen-Diaz or Don Klingborg in the Annual Evaluation and Merit and Promotion Process.

AVP-P Barbara Allen-Diaz receives all recommendations in order to make informed decisions.

Page 15: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Path For Advisors

• Merits: Advisors CD PRC • CDs Supervisor (Barbara, Bill or Don) PRC

• Promotions: Advisors CD Ad hoc PRC• Accelerations: Advisors CD PRC

Page 16: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Decisions

AVP-P receives recommendations and makes decisions.All appeals go to VP Dooley.

Page 17: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

A Good PR is…ACCURATE: Be factual, tell how impacts were

achieved.BRIEF: Make every word work.

CLEAR: Say what you mean.

SPECIFIC: Use examples.

PROFESSIONAL: Make it look professional – adhere to format guidelines.

Page 18: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Make Your Dossier Enjoyableto Read!

Reviewers find it less enjoyable to read if they have to tease out information.

State your overarching program themes.Identify your clientele/audiences.Write clear goals and objectives.Summarize your accomplishments.Remember what is obvious to you, may not be

obvious to all readers -- make it obvious!

Page 19: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

General TipsStart as early as possible.Use your records.Use web examples referenced in e-book.Review and edit; then review and edit

some more.Ask questions.Ask peers to review your work.

Page 20: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

General DirectionsFont: Times New Roman 11 or 12Margins: 1 inch all aroundAdhere to page limitsPlease refer to the e-book found at

http://uncanr.org/pr-ebookTip: Be kind to your readers – use a format that makes

your PR readable.

Page 21: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Fostering Your Success

An excellent presentation, along with high quality work, greatly helps your supervisor write a strong evaluation.

The multi-disciplinary ad hoc(s) will benefit from a concise well-written PR that demonstrates the importance of your program outcomes and/or impacts.

Page 22: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Timeline for PR Process Access is now available through your portal. Deadline for uploading your PR dossier:

• 11:59 PM, February 1, 2011 (note: you may upload your documents and make

corrections/revisions up until the deadline). Results by the end of June 2011 for July 1, 2011

actions.

Page 23: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

What’s New in the PR Process? New in 2010-2011

Only one format: Thematic. Peer Review Committee (PRC) replaces SAC. Program Summary Narrative replaces Self Statement

• 6 page maximum – merit (Steps VII, VIII, IX)• 10 page maximum – promotion (Step VI)• Supported by tabular lists (Extending Knowledge/Applied Research)

Acceleration Statement limited to 1 page. Professional Competence and University and Public Service

Sections limited to 1-2 paragraph summary supported by documenting lists.

Affirmative Action limited to 1-2 paragraphs highlighting effort.

Page 24: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Thematic Format - our chance to explain our program

Theme: your program focus; subject matter expertise; etc. – Themes may or may not relate to Strategic Initiatives

Clientele: People or group of people that a program aims to serve. Goals: The purpose towards which an effort is directed. Inputs: The efforts that provide information from which to develop

products (technology, methodology, etc.). Outputs: Products we create from research inputs. Outcomes: Changed knowledge, attitudes, skills, behavior/practices

resulting from effort. Impacts: Social/health, economic, environmental/physical benefits to

individuals, organizations, populations, communities.

Page 25: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

A Bit More Detail

INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES

Program Investments

Activities Participation Short Medium

What we invest

What we doWho we

reachWhat results

SO WHAT??

What is the VALUE?

Long-term

Page 26: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle

Healthy Families and Communities:• 4H Youth Development

Life Skills Adolescent Development Extension Education Science, Engineering and Technology

Page 27: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle

Food, Nutrition:• Childhood Obesity• Healthy Individuals, Families and Communities• Consumer Food Safety• Food Security

Page 28: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle

Sustainability and Viability of Agriculture:• Sustainable Food Systems• Science and Agriculture Literacy• Organic Crop Production• Ag Productivity, Efficiency and Sustainability• Waste Management

Page 29: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle

Sustainable Use of Natural Resources:• Sustainable Natural Ecosystems• Sustainable Natural Resources• Water Quality, Quantity and Security• Water Conservation and Irrigation Quality

Page 30: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Examples of Themes from 2009-2010 Cycle

Landscape Management:• Wildland/Urban Interface• Wildfire Education

Page 31: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Program Review Sections Advisors

1. Position Description2. Acceleration Statement (if

applicable)3. Program Summary Narrative

• Performance in Applied Research and Creative Activity

• Performance in Extending Knowledge and Information

• Professional Competence• University and Public Service• Affirmative Action

4. Professional Competence (documenting lists)

5. University and Public Service (documenting lists)

6. Bibliography7. Publication Examples and

Summary (if applicable)8. Letters of Evaluation (if

applicable)9. Appendices:

• Project Summary Table• Extension Activities Table• Letters of Publication (if

accepted)• Sabbatical Leave Plan and/or

Report (if applicable)

Page 32: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Position DescriptionThe Position Description provides the basis for evaluating your PR: Include all position descriptions that apply to the

review period. Indicate the time period each was in effect. Develop documentation (i.e. PD addendum) for

special assignments, such as acting County Director or new cross county work.

Page 33: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Acceleration Acceleration requires exceptional achievement in at

least one criteria – identify the “driver”. Acceleration requires greater than normal

productivity in all criteria for your rank and step. Highlight activities that you believe warrant special

attention -- do not just repeat descriptions you provide in other sections.

Focus only on the period since the last review. Why do you deserve an acceleration?

Page 34: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Full Title VII - IX Performance Expectations

Exceptional contributions in their program area or discipline.

Significant impacts/benefits to California, the nation and UC.

Demonstrate continued superior performance and professional stature.

Demonstrate peer leadership and effective collaboration with others.

Page 35: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Advancement to Step IX

This advancement is reserved for persons of the highest distinction whose work has been nationally recognized and acclaimed.

Must demonstrate well-balanced program with outstanding performance in all four academic criteria.

Page 36: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Program Summary Narrative SUMMARIZE THEMES

• Provide ContextDescribe counties covered, nature of clientele, factors that influenced program activities.

• Describe Program GoalsInclude how goals were determined, clientele needs assessments, etc.

• Describe Activities, Research Efforts, Outputs, Outcomes, and Impacts

BUILD PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE• Describe professional activities that supported or were derived from

themes.• Include other elements of professional development, competence

SERVICE• Describe University and Public Service

Page 37: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Program Summary Narrative (cont.) Affirmative Action

• Describe how Affirmative Action tied into program themes and activities.

Highlight your major accomplishments, notable achievements.

Maximum length is 6 pages for all merits, 10 for promotions.

Use bullets, indentation, and subheadings to make your statement more readable.

Page 38: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Affirmative ActionThis is a place to describe your efforts and successes in reaching under-served audiences. Summarize your AA accomplishments as related

to your position description.

Limit this section to 1-2 paragraphs.

Page 39: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Professional CompetenceIn the Program Summary Narrative you summarize activities (in one to two paragraphs) that you:

• Participated in training to become more competent• Are viewed as competent by peers & clientele

In this Professional Competence section, list items by themes presented in your Program Summary.Divide activities into 2 sections:

• Professional Development & Training Training, professional society meetings, memberships, etc. Workgroups (not included elsewhere in PR) and role Non-workgroup activities

• Evidence of Professional Competence Editing books, reviewing articles, professional offices held,

presentations at professional society meetings, etc. Awards, recognition

Page 40: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

University and Public Service

In the Program Summary Narrative you summarize (in one to two paragraphs) that you served the university and the public (all of which generally do not pertain to clientele).

In this service section, list items in two categories:University Service

• Committees, task forces, workgroups, etc.• Leadership roles.

Public Service• Activities and events in which you used your professional expertise to

benefit groups or efforts outside the University. Indicate who benefited. Indicate recognition you received.

(note: activities listed here should relate to your field of expertise or your ANR assignment).

Page 41: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Bibliography Include a Bibliography Summary that indicates the number of

publications in each category. Present your bibliography according to the appropriate categories

described in the e-book. You do not have to rearrange your current bibliography. Instead,

you may simply indicate the category (A-E) next to each entry, if you choose to use these categories.

For citations added during the current review period, annotate each multi-author citation with a sentence identifying your activity/role.

Highlight (e.g. bold) or separate (e.g. enclose with border) citations for this review.

You must scan and upload a letter of acceptance for any publication listed as “in press.”

Page 42: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Bibliography (continued)

For Full Title V to Full Title VI (promotion)o Clearly highlight all publications developed in the Full Title rank.o Additionally, highlight all publications developed since your last salary

action.

For Full Title VII, VIII IX (upper level merit)o Highlight all publications since your last salary action

Page 43: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Publication ExamplesRequired for:

PromotionsAccelerationsMerits to Advisor FT VII – IXChoose 3 that best represent your work

• Describe all 3 on a single page preceding the examples

Page 44: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Letters of Evaluation Needed for:

• Promotions• Accelerations• Merits Advisor FT VII to FT IX• 3rd Term Reviews

Candidate provides names of up to 6 references; may also give names of those not suitable to serve as reference.

Supervisor uses these and may add ones of their own. All letters received are included with dossier. You will not see the letters. For higher Full Title cases, letters showing collaboration with out-

of-state researchers or industry contacts demonstrate growth and influence of your program and beyond California. It is helpful if those who are solicited for letters understand the evaluation criteria.

Page 45: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Project Summary Table(since last salary action)

Use the themes/goals you used to organize your narrative to subdivide the Project Summary table.

List projects, including the ones that do not have specific grants or financial support.

Include: title of project and duration; your role; first initial and last name, and institutional affiliation of collaborators; amount of support and its duration (and type if other than money); and the source.

Page 46: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Extension Activities(since last salary action)

Only list activities directly related to your program clientele.

List activities for non-clientele groups (e.g. students, foreign visitors, scientific colleagues) in Professional Competence or University and Public Service sections.

Format examples appear in e-book.

Page 47: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Other Documents Letters of publication acceptance. (if applicable) Sabbatical leave plan and report. (if applicable) Definitions of acronyms. (if applicable)

Page 48: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Full Title V - VI Coverage Program Summary Narrative for your entire career within

the Full Title rank. Bibliography from your entire career:

o Clearly highlight all publications developed in the Full Title rank.o Additionally, highlight all publications developed since your last

salary action. Years since last review: Extension Activities Table and

Program Summary Table. Years in FT rank: all other components.

• Publication examples can be those submitted in other PR’s in Full Title rank.

• Include all PD’s from all years in Full Title rank.

Page 49: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Full Title VII - IX Merit Coverage

Review period – since most recent salary action. 6 page maximum narrative which documents performance in

four academic criteria and Affirmative Action. Project Summary Table. Extension Activities Table. Bibliography. Letters of Evaluation. 3 Sample Publications.

Page 50: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Theme Example (examples borrowed from UC Delivers)

Conserving water in agricultural systems (Theme)Description of Theme: Water resources are severely limited in both volume and quality in CA. It is critical to assist clientele in conserving water resources and in improving agricultural uses of water. . . .

Goal to address theme: Devise improved systems of irrigation and . .

Research projects: New method for canopy shading measurements; erosion reduction in watersheds; vineyard cover crop and water usage; polymer additives reduce sediment and nutrient losses.

Page 51: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Sample Outline (examples borrowed from UC Delivers)

Role: very brief description (your summary table will provide the details).

Outputs: Findings, writings/publications, new methods and products.

Extension: Brief summary of extension activities related to outputs. How did you extend your products/information to clientele?

Outcomes/impacts as related to overall theme: 20 growers changed practices . . . . Runoff reduced in this watershed . . . . 12 growers used canopy measurement system and altered irrigation scheduling in this manner. . . . Positive impacts on long-term, broader environmental issues. . . .

Page 52: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Theme Example(example borrowed and modified from S. Murdock)

Support Adolescent Leadership Development (1 of 3 themes) Includes 3 projects: Develop and deliver summer program;

Develop workshops and handouts; Conduct statewide survey re: youth leadership.

Background and rationale: Strong leadership is a characteristic of healthy communities. It is critical to identify and develop leadership potential in our youth. . . .

Goal and purpose: Develop programs to build teen leadership.

Page 53: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Sample Outline Role: I identified stake-holders (such as County Office of Ed.)

for this effort, joined relevant workgroups (Adolescent Development Workgroup), organized programs focused on leadership. . . .

Creative activity/extension: Developed a summer program, delivered program (including Family Science Night presentation), developed materials in Spanish, developed survey to discover other leadership programs in California. . . .

Outputs: Program outline in English and Spanish, survey data on other leadership programs for teens. . . .

Outcomes/impacts: Documentation from teens regarding increased teaching skills, interest in science. . . .

Page 54: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Additional Examples of PR

Posted on the Academic Personnel website-merit and promotiono http://ucanr.org/meritpromotion

Page 55: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Need More Help?Questions: Andra Strads @ [email protected] 530-752-7532Pam Tise @ [email protected] 530-754-8509Kim Rodrigues @ [email protected]

530-754-8509

Page 56: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Important Dates

Topic Date Action

Confidential Letters 1/21/11 Deadline for submission

PR Dossiers Due 2/1/11 Academic must upload by 11:59 PM

Page 57: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Outcomes Check-inHas your knowledge of new procedures

increased?Has your knowledge of how to develop a

well written PR increased?How can we best support your success?

Page 58: Merit & Promotion Review Training for Full Title Advisors Advancing to Steps VI, VII, VIII, and IX January 2011

Additional Questions?