MentoringOrienting.doc

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 MentoringOrienting.doc

    1/3

    Mentoring of New Professionals in Student Affairs: Part TwoOrganizational Entry and Socialization

    by Ashley Tull, Florida State UniversityAugust 19, 2003

    From NASPA's NetResults

    This is the second installment of a five-part series of articles forNet Results on mentoring of newprofessionals in student affairs. This article addresses the organizational entry and socialization

    process.

    Each year new professionals enter the world of work fresh from undergraduate and/or graduate

    training to assume positions within student affairs organizations. Unfortunately for many, theirsupervisors are pre-occupied with their own responsibilities and often have little time for support

    and reassurance of the new professional (Rosen, Taube & Wadsworth, 1980). This absence of

    support can hamper the learning and development of new professionals, which includes sharing

    the organization's mission and values, as well as it's norms and operating procedures. In a studentaffairs organization, certain knowledge, skills and abilities are necessary, in order for the new

    professional to be able to function and ultimately persist or advance in the position and/or the

    organization. Trimble, Allen and Vidoni (1991) outlined seven personality preconditions thatwould help motivate and sustain employees in the field of student affairs. These included: the

    ability to function without unanimous support, political savvy, organization, tolerance for

    ambiguity, social skills, tolerance for the delay of positive outcomes, and openness to negativefeedback (pp. 158-159).

    For new professionals entering work in student affairs for the first time, the need for support and

    learning may be multiplied. While many new professionals today received graduate training that

    includes internships or co-op experience, entering full-time work in an organization may still bechallenging. Richmond (1986) offered advice to young professionals employed at small colleges

    that included:

    Cultivate faculty relationships Make changes for the better, but do so carefully Get the lay of the land Get to know your supervisor Move quickly to develop support systems Move quickly to establish relationships with students Take care of yourself

    Become active in professional organizations and maintain your sense of humor (pp. 33-36).

    The advice offered by Richmond could best be achieved in a supportive organization andthrough the use of mentorship.

    Much has been written in the literature about the socialization of new professionals within

    organizations. Klein and Weaver (2000) stated that the socialization of new hires is important

  • 7/28/2019 MentoringOrienting.doc

    2/3

    because this is a time when they encounter adjustment issues and are most susceptible to

    influence of the organization they are entering. They described this process as a time when

    employees learn to adapt, and learn about the organizational culture. Klein and Weaver's study ofnew hires in the orientation process found that participants in orientation programs, "related to

    the people, goals/values, and history dimensions of socialization," (p. 59).

    Social support within organizations has been identified in the literature as an important factor in

    the adjustment of new professionals. New professionals often enter organizations with littlesupport from others in the work environment, a time when they most need support during their

    adjustment. The success or failure of new professionals adjustment can be linked to the presence

    of social support systems within the organization. Nelson and Quick (1991) found that positivepsychological and emotional adjustments to the work environment were associated with the

    presence or lack of presence of support systems.

    For new professionals the presence of a support system provides the employee with information

    resources. More tenured and experienced staff within the organization can assist the new

    professional with important information about the organization's goals and specific informationneeded to be successful in the job. Morrison (1993) found that newcomers' seek a variety of

    information from those they work with in the organization. Some information sought bynewcomers' includes: role definitions, expectations, role demands, norms and values of the

    organization, feedback from supervisors, and social feedback (Morrison, 1993).

    For many new professionals, their supervisor may serve as their mentor, at least initially until the

    new professional becomes better oriented to the organization and it's members. Supervisors andothers in student affairs organizations should not ignore the important role that they play for the

    integration of the new professionals.

    Supervisors should be concerned with educating new professionals about the important role theyplay in the organization. By demonstrating an interest in the career development andadvancement of new professionals, supervisors, and others in the organization show their

    commitment not only to the new professional, but to their organization as well. Katz and

    Tushman (1983), when studying engineers concluded that, "the relationship between lowerturnover and high interpersonal involvement with gate keeping supervisors affirms the important

    role that project supervisors can and should play during the early socialization years of young

    professionals," (p. 453).

    Not all supervisors in organizations share the same affinity for building relationships with thenew professionals they work with. Based on research in the field, supervisors and others within

    the organization should not ignore or take for granted the support needs of the new professionals

    they employ. This is where mentorship (formal or informal) can help to fill the gap.

    References

  • 7/28/2019 MentoringOrienting.doc

    3/3

    Katz, R., & Tushman, M. L. (1983). A longitutidanl study of the effects of boundary spanning

    supervision on turnover and promotion in research and development.Academy of Management

    Journal, 26(3), 437-456.

    Klein, H. J., & Weaver, N. A. (2000). The effectiveness of an organizational level orientation

    training program in the socialization of new hires.Personnel Psychology, 53, 47-66.

    Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and

    outcomes.Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 557-589.

    Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (1991). Social support and newcomer adjustment in organizations:Attachment theory at work?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(6), 543-554.

    Richmond, D. R. (1986). The young professional at the small college: Tips for professional

    success and personal survival.NASPA Journal, 24(2), 32-37.

    Rosen, J., Taube, S. R., & Wadsworth, E. L. (1980). The first professional year: Interviews withthe new professionals at SUNY-Stony Brook.NASPA Journal, 17(3), 52-59.

    Trimble, R. W., Allen, D. R., & Vidoni, D. O. (1991). Student personnel administration: Is if for

    you?NASPA Journal, 28(2), 156-162.