42
Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey Plant Operators Conference May 2016

Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

  • Upload
    vuthuan

  • View
    217

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Membrane Fouling

Prevention

By: Jason Bailey

Plant Operators Conference May 2016

Page 2: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

2

Page 3: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

3

Page 4: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

4

Page 5: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

5

Page 6: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Five Fundamental Causes of Fouling

6

Scale Formation

Colloidal Fouling

Chemical Fouling

Inadequate Membrane Cleaning Techniques

Biological Fouling

Page 7: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

7

First Membrane, First Stage:Bio, Iron, Silt, etc.

Page 8: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Sand & Paint Chips

AntiscalantSoftener Resin

Other Foulants

Page 9: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

9

Last Membrane, Second Stage:Scale-Silica, Calcium Carbonate, etc.

Page 10: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Key Instrumentation to Identify Fouling

• Pressures

– Feed, Interstage and Concentrate

• Conductivity

– Feed, Product and Concentrate

• Flows

– Product and Concentrate

• Temperature

Page 11: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - RO System Monitoring

11

Cartridge

Filter

PSI

1st Array 2nd Array

Concentrate

Permeate

pH

PSI

SDI

NTU

Temp

PSI

COND

GPM

PSICOND

GPM PSI

COND

PSI

SDI

Cl2

NTU

Feed water

High Pressure

Pump

Page 12: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Data Normalization

• Normalization calculations are necessary to correct changes in temperature, TDS feed flow, pressure, and other factors that are not directly related to fouling.

• Example: A 10-degree decrease in temperature causes feeding 30% loss in the permeate flux.

Page 13: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

• As temperature increases, the permeate flux increases.

• When the temperature increases, the salt rejection decreases.

Performance vs. Temperature

Temperature

RO Troubleshooting Temperature Effect

Page 14: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

• When the pressure increases, the salt rejection increases.

• When the pressure increases, the permeate flux increases.

Performance vs. Pressure

Pressure

RO Troubleshooting Pressure Effect

Page 15: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Temperature

Flow

Pressure

RO Troubleshooting Data Interpretation

Page 16: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

80

85

90

95

100

105

Normailized Flow

RO Troubleshooting Data Interpretation

Page 17: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Membrane Cleaning

17

Data Collection is the Key

Page 18: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting

18

Biological and Colloidal Fouling

Page 19: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting

19

Biological and Colloidal Fouling

Page 20: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Factors Influencing Biogrowth

Biogrowth

Bacteria

Temp.

Oxygen

Level

Nutrients

Page 21: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Biological Fouling

21

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Slime in Vessels or Pipe. Noticeable odor.

High Pressure Differential in 1st

Array

Page 22: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting – Biological Fouling

22

First array exhibits a high dPFront end biological

slime with a strong odor

1st Array 2nd Array

Concentrate

Permeate

Feed Water

Into pre filter

PSI PSI

Page 23: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Colloidal Fouling

23

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Indicators of colloidal fouling would be:•High pressure differential on first array.•Membrane telescoping.•High turbidity in feed water.•Reduced permeate flow.

Page 24: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting – Colloidal Fouling

24

Colloidal particulate materials: called "Colloidal

silica, fine clays, oxides particles and bacteria which are usually deposited in the

first bank of RO system

Concentrate

Permeate

Page 25: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

• The value of SDI (Silt Density Index) is an indicator of the potential of colloidal fouling. Although sometimes can not predict how quickly fouling will occur.

• SDI <5 is recommended

• The value of turbidity is a good indicator to evaluate the performance of filtration methods that feed the RO system. Ideal turbidity is <0.2 NTU

• Particle counts are also a good indicator to evaluate the pretreatment.

• Particle counts of <100 / ml in the range of 2-50 microns is ideal.

Colloidal Fouling Control

Page 26: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting – Humic/Organic Fouling

26

Humic / Organic fouling can occur in 1st or 2nd

array and is usually more common in surface

waters.

1st Array 2nd Array

Concentrate

Permeate

Page 27: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting – Chemical Fouling

27

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Incompatible pretreatment chemicals can cause front end fouling that is difficult to remove.

When incompatible chemistries are mixed together there will be a measurable increase in turbidity.

Page 28: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting – High Front End dP

28

Concentrate

Permeate

The symptoms are:Increased Feed PressuresReduced Permeate FlowMembrane Telescoping

Page 29: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Turbidity vs. RO Cleaning Frequency

Turbidity vs. Cleaning Frequency

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Turbidity, NTU

Cle

an

ing

Fre

qu

en

cy,

Mo

nth

s

Page 30: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Particle Count vs. RO Cleaning Frequency

Particle Count vs. Cleaning Frequency

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Particle Count, Number/mL

Cle

an

ing

Fre

qu

en

cy,

Mo

nth

s

Page 31: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

SDI vs. Cleaning Frequency

SDI vs. Cleaning Frequency

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

SDI

Cle

an

ing

Fre

qu

en

cy,

Mo

nth

s

Page 32: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Most Important Factors for Effective MMF Performance

• Proper media selection and installation.

• Proper service & backwash flow rates.

• Slow moving valves.

• Proper lateral designs.

• Backwash on turbidity breakthrough or pressure differential.

• Proper chemical selection.

Page 33: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Scale Formation

33

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Scaling occurs when soluble minerals become concentrated in the RO and exceed saturation limits.

Symptoms of scale would be poor salt rejection, low product flow and high pressure differential in last array.

Page 34: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Scale Formation

34

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Scale will often be seen on the downstream end of the last membrane in the system or on the inside of the last pressure vessel.

Scale can be abrasive and scratch the membrane surface causing permanent damage.

Page 35: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting – Scale Fouling

35

Scale forms from the back of the system in the downstream

arrays and fouls backwards toward the front resulting in

high dP, loss of permeate flow, loss of permeate quality.

Concentrate

Permeate

Page 36: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Calcium Carbonate Scale

36

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

This is an example of severe calcium carbonate scale.

Calcium carbonate scale is not always white. The weight of a scaled membrane can be much greater than a new membrane.

Page 37: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Calcium Carbonate Scale

37

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Mix a solution containing ½ DI water

and ½ Hydrochloric acid. Drop a

small sample of the foulant in the

solution. If the foulant contains

calcium carbonate, it will bubble. If

there is residual material after

bubbling has stopped, then the

foulant consists of more than just

calcium carbonate.

.

Page 38: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Sulfate Scale

38

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Symptoms of sulfate scale would be the same as other scales. Poor salt rejection, low product flow and high pressure differential in last array.

Page 39: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

RO Troubleshooting - Sulfate Scale

39

1st array 2nd array

Concentrate

Permeate

Pre Filter

Symptoms of sulfate scale would be the same as other scales. Poor salt rejection, low product flow and high pressure differential in last array.

Barium Sulfate scale can be the most abrasive and scratch the membrane surface causing permanent damage. See the SEM photo.

Page 40: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

4000 PPM10000 PPM

Concentration Factor

50% Recovery2x Concentration

75% Recovery4x Concentration

90% Recovery10x Concentration

Feed Water

Product Water

Concentrate Water

1000 PPM

2000 PPM

Page 41: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

Antiscalant

41

Proper Chemical

Proper DosageDilution Strength

Proper Recovery

Page 42: Membrane Fouling Prevention By: Jason Bailey

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio

dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium

voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores

et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati

cupiditate non provident.