Upload
ryan-mcmahon
View
213
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mem
ber
of
the H
elm
holt
z A
ssoci
ati
on
Fuel retention in carbon materials
Arkadi Kreter et al
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 3
Extensive database on retention in CFC/FGG
Analysed materials:
CFC NB41 (new EU ITER grade) [1]
CFC NB31 (former ITER grade) [2]
CFC DMS780 (JET) [2]
CFC DMS701 (ASDEX Upgrade) [3]
CFC N11 (Tore Supra) [4]
fine-grain graphite (FGG) EK98 (i.e. TEXTOR) [2]
FGG IG-430U (ALT-II TEXTOR)
FGG ATJ (DIII-D) [1]
Exposures in:
PISCES-A/B [1,3,4], TEXTOR test limiter [2], TEXTOR ALT-II main limiter
[1] A. Kreter et al., PFMC-12, Jülich 2009[2] A. Kreter et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Series 100 (2008) 062024[3] R. Pugno et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 375 (2008) 168[4] J. Roth et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 363–365 (2007) 822
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 4
Exposures in PISCES-A/-B linear plasma devices
ErodedMaterial
PISCES (-A, -B) schematic view
Steady-state plasma
ne = (2-3)·1018 m-3 ; Te = 7-15 eV
= (3-6)·1022 D/m2s
Variations of:
Ei = 20 - 120 eV
= 1·1025 - 5·1026 D/m2 (~1 ITER pulse at strike point)
Ts = 370 K ('cold' ITER wall) - 820 K (ITER strike point)
Controlled Be, He and Ar seeding
All experiments in erosion-dominated conditions
PISCES-A plasma and target
Ex-situ analysis of samples for retention
• Thermal desorption spectrometry (TDS)• Nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) with 3He
beam
B
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 5
Exposures on test limiter in TEXTOR tokamak
Test limiter with CFC/FGG stripes
59mm
30 o
60m mtoroidal d irectionpoloidal direction
r=a=460m m
r=461.5m m
r=490m m
r
NB
31
DM
S780
EK98
32 reproducible Ohmic discharges in 80% D
177 s total duration
Limiter tip at LCFS (0.46 m)
neLCFS 1·1019 m-3 ; Te
LCFS 45 eV; Ti Te
LCFS 2.9·1025 D/m2; SOL() 12 mm
Tlim 500 K
Ex-situ analysis of samples for retention
• Thermal desorption spectrometry (TDS)• Nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) with 3He
beam• High-resolution NRA with m-size 3He
beam (-NRA)
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 6
Retention in NB41: Fluence dependence
M=4 (D2) desorption spectra(Ts = 470 K, Ei = 120 eV)
400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
D2 d
es
orp
tio
n f
lux
[x
10
19 D
/m2 s
]
Temperature [K]
=50e25 D/m2
10e25
3e25
1e25
470
K
Ret
enti
on
[D
/m2 ]
Ion fluence [D/m2]
NB41 PISCES-A [1] N11 PISCES-A [2] NB31 TEXTOR [3] DMS780 TEXTOR [3] EK98 TEXTOR [3]
1024 1025 1026 1027
1021
1022
0.35
Total D retention for exposures at Ts = 470 K, Ei = 120 eV
No saturation up to =51026 D/m2
ATJ PISCES-A [1]
[2] A. Kreter et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Series 100 (2008) 062024[1] J. Roth et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 363–365 (2007) 822
Similar behaviour for different CFCs and fine-grain graphites
0.5 K/s
[1] A. Kreter et al., PFMC-12, Jülich 2009
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 7
400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
D2
des
orp
tio
n f
lux
[x10
19 D
/m2 s
]
Temperature [K]
Ts=470 KTs=370 K
Ts=820 K
470
K
370
K
820
K
Higher retention for lower exposure temperatures due to additional trapping sites
and higher population
M=4 (D2) desorption spectra (Ei = 120 eV, = 2.4e26 D/m2)
Ret
enti
on
[D
/m2 ]
Ion fluence [D/m2]1025 1026 1027
1021
1022
Total D retention for exposures at different temperatures in PISCES-A and -B
Higher retention for lower Ts
Saturation for Ts > ~800 K
[1] R. Pugno et al., JNM 375 (2008) 168
Saturation
NB41 Ts=370K NB41 Ts=470K NB41 Ts=820K DMS701 Ts=1070K [1]
Retention in NB41: dependence on exposure temperature
0.5 K/s
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 8
Retention in NB41: dependence on ion energy
Higher retention for higher incident ion energy
400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Temperature [K]
D2 d
es
orp
tio
n f
lux
[x
10
19 D
/m2 s
]
Total D retention vs Ei
( = 1e26 D/m2, Ts = 470 K)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400
1x1021
2x1021
3x1021
4x1021
5x1021
6x1021
7x1021
Re
ten
tio
n [
D/m
2 ]
Incident ion energy [eV]
M=4 (D2) desorption spectra ( = 1e26 D/m2, Ts = 470 K)
Ei=20eV
Ei=50eV
Ei=120eV
0.5 K/s
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 9
Retention in C: dependence on ion flux
Data from PISCES and TEXTOR exposures compared to data from ion-beam facilities
[J. Roth et al., JNM 363–365 (2007) 822]
Ion beam data show higher retention than data from plasma devices Can be attributed to flux dependence (higher retention for lower fluxes)
Typical ion fluxes
Ion beam: 41019 m-2s-1
PISCES, TEXTOR: ~1022 - 1023 m-2s-1
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 10
ALT-II main limiter in TEXTOR tokamak
Inside view of TEXTOR
History of analysed tile:
Exposed 2004 - 2008
Pulses: 8534; Plasma: 43473 s
Area-averaged H+D fluence: 1.4e26 m-2
Temperature 400 K – 650 K
Analysis for retention by laser desorption
Laser desorption parameters:
t = 1.5 ms
A= 0.05 cm2
P= 70 kW/cm2
main toroidal limiter ALT-IIa = 0.46 m
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 11
ALT-II main limiter in TEXTOR tokamak
D retention in erosion zone: ~5e21 D/m2, or ~1e22 D for total ALT-II
D retention in deposition zone: ~1e23 D/m2, or ~1e23 D for total ALT-II
Retention in TEXTOR is dominated by co-deposition (~90%)
Analysis for retention by laser desorptionR
eten
tio
n [
m-2]
Poloidal position along tile surface [mm]
deuteriumhydrogen
depositionzone
erosionzone
depositionclose to bolts
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 12
Long-term exposure vs dedicated experiments
Ret
enti
on
[m
-2]
Ion fluence [m-2]
NB41 PISCES-A N11 PISCES-A NB31 TEXTOR DMS780 TEXTOR EK98 TEXTOR
1024 1025 1026 1027
1021
1022
0.35
ATJ PISCES-A
Retention in long-term exposure in good agreement with dedicated experiments
Retention in bulk of CFCs and FGGs
H+D ALT-II TEXTOR(comparable Ts, Ei, )
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 13
0 1 2 3 4 510-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
D a
tom
ic c
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
Depth [m]
Retention in NB41: D penetrates deep in bulk
NRA depth profile of NB41 (=31025 D/m2, Ts=470 K, Ei=120 eV)
18 at% of D at surface saturated implantation layerPenetration in bulk
-NRA 2D mapping of D in NB31 exposed in TEXTOR
for = 1.21025 D/m2 at Ts = 500 K
exposedsurface
cleavage
-NRAmapping
20
10
30
00 20 40 60 80 100
D a
mou
nt [c
ount
s]
Depth [ m]
2001000 300 400 500Distance along surface [ m]
020406080
100120
Dep
th [
m]
01234567
D amount [counts]
Inhomogeneous penetration of D in bulk over tens of m
A. Kreter et al., J. Phys.: Conf. Series 100 (2008) 062024
P. Petersson et al., PFMC-12, Juelich 2009
2 MeV 3He+ beam
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 14
Influence of Be on retention
D2 TDS spectra for ATJ exposed w/o and with Be (Ts=720K, Ei=35 eV)
Be carbide layer appears to prevent increase of retention with fluence
Total Deuterium Retention
With Be, =0.5e26 D/m2 before Be, =2e26 D/m2 total:
1.9e21 D/m2
Pure D, =2e26 D/m2:
2.3e21 D/m2
Pure D, =0.5e26 D/m2:
1.6e21 D/m2400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
pure D =0.5e26m-2
pure D=2e26m-2
Be containingplasma
D2 d
eso
rpti
on
flu
x [x
1019
D/m
2s]
Temperature [K]
Scenario of Be experiment
1. Establishing background plasma (=0.5e26 D/m2)
2. Be injection from oven (total =2e26 D/m2)
0.5 K/s
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 15
400 600 800 1000 12000.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5 D D+Be D+Be+He
D2 d
es
orp
tio
n f
lux
[x
10
19 D
/m2 s
]
Temperature [K]
Influence of Be+He on retention
D2 TDS spectra for ATJ exposed to pure D, D+Be, D+Be+He (Ts=720K, Ei=35 eV, fHe=16%)
He appears to change the retention mechanism and reduce retention
Sensitive to exposure parameters (not effective at high Ei)
Similar effect of Argon
Total Deuterium Retention
D+Be, =0.5e26 D/m2 before Be, =2e26 D/m2 total:
1.8e21 D/m2
Pure D, =0.5e26 D/m2:
1.6e21 D/m2
D+Be+He, =0.4e26 D/m2 before Be, =1.7e26 D/m2 total:
0.5e21 D/m2
0.5 K/s
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 17
Summary and discussion: pure D plasma (I)
In-bulk retention is similar in different CFCs and fine-grain graphites CFCs and fine-grain graphites are porous
In-bulk retention is higher for lower exposure temperatures Additional trapping sites at lower temperatures Higher population of available trapping sites at lower temperatures
In-bulk retention scales as fluence with depending on temperature:
<~0.5 for low Ts (surface diffusion along pores)
=0 for Ts>~800K – saturation of retention for < 31025 D/m2 (few sec of ITER pulse)
1. Incident deuterium ions saturate the implantation layer (~10-100 nm)2. The level of saturation is defined by the balance between adsorption and ion-induced
desorption for a given number of available trapping sites3. From the implantation layer, D 'diffuses' further in-bulk along surfaces of the pores
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 18
Summary and discussion: pure D plasma (II)
1. Incident deuterium ions saturate the implantation layer (~10-100 nm)2. The level of saturation is defined by the balance between adsorption and ion-induced
desorption for a given number of available trapping sites3. From the implantation layer, D 'diffuses' further in-bulk along surfaces of the pores
In-bulk retention is higher for higher incident ion energies Higher D concentration in implantation layer [Staudenmaier JNM79] leads to higher D
amount in bulk
In-bulk retention is higher for lower fluxes Amount of diffused deuterium t, longer time available for D to diffuse in for the same
fluence
Arkadi Kreter et al. "Fuel retention in carbon materials" EU-TF PWI SEWG on fuel retention/removal, Cadarache 15 June 2009 19
Summary and discussion: influence of impurities
1. Incident deuterium ions saturate the implantation layer (~10-100 nm)2. The level of saturation is defined by the balance between adsorption and ion-induced
desorption for a given number of available trapping sites3. From the implantation layer, D 'diffuses' further in-bulk along surfaces of the pores
With addition of Be no further increase of in-bulk retention Be carbide layer appears to suppress the in-bulk penetration of deuterium (Be2C layer
thickness is a few 100 nm)
He and Ar impurities decrease the in-bulk retention Presumably due to depletion (ion-induced detrapping) of the implantation layer, from
where it otherwise moves deeper in the bulk• Do impurities deplete co-deposited layers from D? To be tested experimentally