Upload
shaikh-m-ibrahim
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
1/42
ME 42104 : OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES
Lecture 1
G. N. Kotwal
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
2/42
constraints on system’sbehaviourConstraints can be imposed on:
• equivalent stress• critical buckling load (local and global), can include
postbuckling c aracteristics• !requenc" o! vibrations (can be several)• cost• etc.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
3/42
35
o ce o es gnvariables
•
Design variables are selected to uniquely identify adesign. They have to be be mutually independent.
• Typical examples:
Area of cross section of bars in a truss structure Number of a specific steel section in a catalogue ofUB sections
oordinates of poles of B!splines defining the shape
of an aerofoil " etc.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
4/42
OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM
•A formal mathematical optimization problem : to find components of the vector x of designvariables :
#her e F( x ) is the objective function " gj( x ) are theconstraint functions " the last set of inequalityconditions defines the side constraints .
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
5/42
Unc n!tr"#ne$ O%t#'"t# n%r ()e&!
S &e %t#'"t# n %r ()e&! $ n t #n* )*e "n+ c n!tr"#nt! "n$ c"n(e !t"te$ "!:
• #uc problems are called unconstrained optimizationproblems.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
6/42
%r ()e& .An %t#'"t# n %r ()e& c"n (e !t"te$ "! , )) -!.
#here $ is an n!dimensional vector called the design vector, /(X) istermed the objective Junction, and gj (X) and Ij (X) are known asinequality and equality constraints" respectively. The number ofvariables n and the number o constraints m and/or/! need not be relatedin any way" #he $roblem stated in %q. above is called a constrained
o$timi%ation $roblem"
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
7/42
r ter a o system se ciency
riteria of structural efficiency are described by the ob&ective function F( x ). Typicalexamples:
cost#eightuse of resources 'fuel" etc.(stress concentrationetc.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
8/42
xamp e o a screteproblem
•
)ptimi*ation of a steel structure #here some of the members are described by +, designvariables. %ach design variable represents a number of a UB section from a catalogue of +,available sections.• )ne full structural analysis of each design ta-es + sec. on a computer.
• uestion: ho# much time #ould it ta-e to chec- all the combinations of cross!sections in
order to guarantee the optimum solution/
• Ans#er: 0+1 years
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
9/42
41
/# cu)t+ #n ! )*#n "$#!crete %r ()e&
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
10/42
M"t e&"t#c") M $e)#n E "&%)e!Ne- c n!u&er re!e"rc #n$#c"te! t "t %e %)e )# e t $r#n "( ut 0.5)#ter , ! $" "t " t#&e $ur#n t e !u&&er & nt !. T e ,"(r#c"t# nc !t , t e re$e!# ne$ ! $" c"n #! %r % rt# n") t t e !ur,"ce "re"
"n$ c"n (e e!t#&"te$ "t 1.0 %er !6u"re &eter , t e &"ter#")u!e$. A c#rcu)"r cr !! !ect# n #! t e & !t %)"u!#()e #*en currentt )#n "*"#)"()e , r &"nu,"cture. 7 r "e!t et#c re"! n! 8 t e e# t&u!t (e "t )e"!t t-#ce t e $#"&eter. Stu$#e! #n$#c"te t "t )$#n
c &, rt re6u#re! " $#"&eter (et-een 9 "n$ c&.
/e!# n *"r#"()e! : S#'e! : $8 8tA!!u&%t# n! : t #! !&")) 8 # n re$ #n t e c")cu)"t# n , * )u&e ,c"n.On)+ C+). Sur,"ce c n!#$ere$ , r * ). c")cu)"t# n!8 n t t e en$!.
T+%#c"))+ 8 c "n e #n %"r"&eter! -#)) c"u!e t e ! )ut# n t (erec &%ute$./e!# n %"r"&eter: C ;C !t < un#t "re" = 1 C. %er !6. c&. >
T e $e!# n ,unct# n! -#)) #nc)u$e : c &%ut"t# n , t e * )u&eenc) !e$ (+ t e c"n "n$ t e !ur,"ce "re" , t e c+)#n$r#c") !ect# n. * )u&e #n t e c"n ? @$2
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
11/42
Se"rc Pr ce$ureN n)#ne"r Pr ()e&!:S )ut# n !e"rc e$ (+!e"rc < nu&. < #ter"t#*e;Ste%-#!e ") r#t &>&et $!.Pr %er #n#t#") ue!! #!nece!!"r+8 t re %er#ence.
ett#n c) !er t t e! )ut# n = C n*er enceIn#t#") ue!! D 0 = n nD,e"!#()e. t 1 (+#$ent#,+#n " !e"rc
$#rect# n. S) ;*ect r,r & 0 t 1>.1 #! (etter t "n 0 =
,e"!#()e (ut n nD%t#&").
In !"&e $#ret# n8 S) c"n#*e 1 "t BS)
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
12/42
Complete algorit m decides wa"s o! !inding # and $
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
13/42
C"nt#)e*er Be"&A c"nt#)e*er (e"& nee$! t (e $e!# ne$ t c"rr+#n " % #nt ) "$ 7 "tt e en$ , t e (e"& , )en t L. T e cr !! !ect# n , t e (e"&
-#II (e #n t e ! "%e , t e )etter I (e"& ! u)$ &eet %re!cr#(e$,"#)ure cr#ter#". T ere #! ")! " I#t n #t! $eFect# n. A (e"& ,n#&u& &"!! #! re6u#re$ t (e $e!# ne$. Ac8 Qc8 Ic ? C
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
14/42
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
15/42
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
16/42
4G
S#'#n
%t#'"t# n Tr"ct rDtr"#)erc &(#n"t# n
)b&ective: toimprove the ride
characteristics
Design variables: properties of thesuspension system
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
17/42
4
' n%t#'"t#
n 7)# t !#&u)"t r2inematic optimi*ation of a3te#art platform manipulatorfor a flight simulator.
The goal of optimi*ation is todesign a manipulator #ithmaximum #or-space #hosecharacteristics are definedaccording to the manoeuvres ofan aircraft.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
18/42
50
S#'#n
%t#'"t# n 7)# t !#&u)"t r 'cont.(2inematic optimi*ation of a
3te#art platform manipulator for aflight simulator.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
19/42
51
S#'#n
%t#'"t# n 7)# t !#&u)"t r3ix design variables define the configuration of the platform.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
20/42
52
S#'#n %t#'"t# n%r ()e&!
St#r)#n en #ne
)b&ective: to improve thethermodynamic efficiency.
onstraint: po#er output.
Design variables: parameters ofthe engine.
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
21/42
53
S "%e
%t#'"t# nO%t#'"t# n , " !%"nner
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
22/42
54
S "%e
%t#'"t# nO%t#'"t# n , " !%"nner
A CA/ & $e) , " !tructure. M *e! , t e ( un$"r+ "re ")) -e$ "t t e #n$#c"te$ % #nt!
S "%
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
23/42
55
S "%e%t#'"t#
nO%t#'"t# n , " !%"nner
4nitial and final designs. ourtesy of 5. 6assmusen
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
24/42
59
S "%e %t#'"t# n%r ()e&!
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
25/42
5
S "%e %t#'"t# n%r ()e&!
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
26/42
5G
S "%e %t#'"t# n%r ()e&!
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
27/42
5
O%t#'"t# n , "n "er , #) B!spline representation of the NA A ,,+7 aerofoil. The B!spline poles arenumbered from + to 78. Design variables: & and y coordinates of 77 B!spline poles ' ' 9
(.
E AMPLES: SHAPE OPTIMIZATION
;.A. ;right" .
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
28/42
90
Pr ()e& $e n#t# n ;"er , #)8c nt.>
E AMPLES: SHAPE OPTIMIZATION
@roblem formulation:•)b&ective function 'to be minimi*ed(: drag coefficient at
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
29/42
91
Re!u)t! ;"er , #)8 c nt.>E AMPLES: SHAPE OPTIMIZATION
6esults of
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
30/42
92
Speci c Features of ShapeOptimization
CA/ & $e) ener"t# n #! $ ne nceO%t#'"t# n %r ce!! & $# e! t #! CA/ & $e) "n$ return!" *")#$ CA/ & $e) t "t nee$! t (e "n")+!e$ T e CA/ & $e) ")) -! , r t e u!e , "ut &"t#c t )!;&e! ener"t r8 "$"%t#*e 7E8 etc>
E "&%)e. L#n #n " 7E &e! $#rect)+ t %t#'"t# n c"n*# )"te t e ("!#c "!!u&%t# n! t e & $e) #! ("!e$ n:
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
31/42
93
Pr ()e& $e n#t# n; %t#'"t# n , " ! e))>
A shell is described by a square reference plan. The mid!surface is described usingsquare patches. At the -eypoints the out!of!plane coordinate and its derivatives #ith respectto the in!plane coordinates have been specified.
& t
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
32/42
94
r e& e n t n; %t#'"t# n , " ! e))8
c nt.> The geometry is assumed to be symmetric #ith respect to the diagonals. The designvariables are the out!of!plane coordinates of the -eypoints and the corresponding derivatives'+7 in total(. The out!of!plane coordinates of the corners are fixed. Also" the thic-ness of theshell is ta-en as a design variable. The shell is supported at its corner nodes" for #hich alldisplacement components are prescribed. The shell is loaded by a uniform out!of!plane load.
The optimi*ation problem is formulated as minimi*ation of the maximum displacement #hilethe volume remains belo# the specified limit.
Numerical studiy sho#ed that this optimi*ation problem has several local optima. T#odesigns corresponding to almost equally good optima are sho#n in the figures belo#.
P () & $ # #
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
33/42
95
Pr ()e& $e n#t# n; %t#'"t# n , "
! e))8 c nt.>
Eirst design" normali*ed constraint equals ,.>>0
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
34/42
99
Pr ()e& $e n#t# n; %t#'"t# n , " ! e))8
c nt.>
3econd design" normali*ed constraint equals ,.>>?
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
35/42
9
Three!bay by four!bay by four!storey structure
Discrete variables arenumbers of sections froma catalogue
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
36/42
9G
O%t#'"t# n, ,r nt -#n
, J3 J" u"rR"c#n7 r&u)" 1c"r
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
37/42
9
O%t#'"t# n , ,r nt-#n , J3 J" u"r R"c#n7 r&u)" 1 c"r
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
38/42
0
enet#cA) r#t &
Eront #ing of 505aguar 6acingEormula + car
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
39/42
1
enet#cA) r#t &
3chematic layup of the compositestructure of the
#ing
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
40/42
2
)ptimi*ation problem: minimi*e mass sub&ect to displacement constraints 'E4A andaerodynamics(6esult of optimi*ation by a genetic algorithm ' A(:)btained design #eight: .>8 2gBaseline design #eight: 8.7 2g4mprovement: .?F
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
41/42
3
M"ter#") %t#'"t# n
%r ()e&;O. S# &un$8 TU ,/en&"r >
Design of a negative @oissonGs ratio material 'expands vertically #hen stretched
hori*ontally( using topology optimi*ation. Heft: base cell. entre: @eriodicmaterial composed of repeated base cells. 6ight: Test beam manufactured by
8/18/2019 ME 42104_Lect.1
42/42
ter %t & t n%r ()e& ;O. S# &un$8 TU ,
/en&"r >
Design of a material #ith negative thermal expansion. 4t is composed of t#omaterials #ith different thermal expansion coefficients + 9 + 'blue( and 7
9+, 'red( and voids. The effective thermal expansion coefficient is ,9 .+1.Heft: base cell. entre: thermal displacement of microstructure sub&ected toheating. 6ight: periodic material composed of repeated base cells.