MDL-MGR-GS-000007, Rev. 00, ACN 01, 'Supplemental ... · 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 Velocity, feet per second. Base Case 1_Vs Base

Model QA: QA r-Io

SSC oAdministrative Change Notice Page 1 of 9 o

Complete only applicable items.

1. Document Number: I MDL-MGR-GS·000007 I 2. Revision: I00 I 3. ACN: I 014. Title: I Supplemental Earthquake Ground Motion Input for a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, NV - u

5. No. of Pages Attached I 8 I oCl

6. Approvals:Preparer:

UJ~Ivan Wong .IIIJM J4. $J~~Print name and sign Date

Checker:Richard Quittmeyer v<.e.~ 0.383/u:>o9:'Print name and sign Date f

.. _._-

&y-

QER:Jerry Heaney 3/l.'lJo§Print name and sign ~ Date •

Independent TechnicalReviewer:

Richard C. Lee Iif£ey./_

-e _' C, . .itt. • ,f.,ltJ~

Print name and sign Date •

Responsible Manager: '-.. '\-2James S. Whitcraft 3./r -- Ill/orPrint name and Sigy/ y Date

7. Affected Pages '--' 8. Description of Change:

6-3 In Figure 6.1-1, added a connector from the "Site-specific Horizontal Ground Motion" box to the"Site-specific 5%-damped Design Spectra" box and adjusted the positions ofother connectors asnecessary.

6-142 In Figure 6.4.2-3, revised the X-axis label from "Shear Wave Velocity..." to "Seismic Velocity... ,"revised caption to "2004 Base Case Vs and Vp Profiles Developed for the RB," and deleted note.

6-233 In Figure 6.4.2-94, removed the unsmoothed profile for the 2004 Tuff Base Case, and reshaped legendbox.

6-261; 6-262 In each of Figures 6.5.1-7 and 6.5.1-8, corrected the right-axis scale to be consistent with the left-axisscale.

6-312 Replaced the data plot in Figure 6.5.2-34 with the data plot from original Figure 6.5.2-41, and thencorrected the right-axis scale to be consistent with the left-axis scale, corrected the top-axis scale tobe consistent with the bottom-axis scale, and extended the "Mean-Horizontal" curve to the upper left.

6-319 Replaced the data plot Figure 6.5.2-41 with the data plot from original Figure 6.5.2-34, and thencorrected the right-axis scale to be consistent with the left-axis scale.

6-320 In Figure 6.5.2-42, corrected the right-axis scale to be consistent with the left-axis scale, andcorrected the top-axis scale to be consistent with the bottom-axis scale.

LP-SII I. 1OO-SSC FORM NO. LS1I110-1 (Rev. 02/07/2005)

7 . .lorn ' r'orrIn! r melt' , f? 'r7' 7$ $i;' F

Supplemental Earthquake Ground Motion Input for a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, NV

Figure 6.1-1 Flow Diagram for Developing Earthquake Ground Motion Inputs

MDL-MGR-GS-000007 REV 00 ACN 01 6-3 March 2008


1200

1150

1100

1050

1000

950

900

850

800

750

700

650

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0D

epth

Bel

ow G

roun

d S

urfa

ce, f

eet

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000

Shear Wave Velocity, feet per second

Base Case 1_VsBase Case 2_VsBase Case 1_VpBase Case 2_Vp

Source: BSC 2004 [DIRS 170027], Figure 6.2-118; Appendix C, Table C-1

Figure 6.4.2-3. 2004 Base Case VS and VP Profiles Developed for the RB

Seismic Velocity, feet per second



2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0

Dep

th B

elow

Gro

und

Surf

ace,

feet

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Seismic Velocity, feet per second

blan

k

2004 Tuff Base Case

2007 Tuff Base CaseNortheast of Exile Hill Fault Splay

2007 Tuff Base Case South of Exile Hill Fault Splay Case A

2007 Tuff Base Case South of Exile Hill Fault Splay Case B

2007 Tuff Base Case South of Exile Hill Fault Splay Case C

Source: Appendix C, Table C-1

Figure 6.4.2-94. Comparison of 2004 and 2007 Smoothed SFA Base Case VS Profiles for Tuff



1x10-8

1x10-7

1x10-6

1x10-5

1x10-4

1x10-3

1x10-2

1x10-1

Ann

ual F

requ

ency

of E

xcee

danc

e

Original Point A (Mean)Mean

0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000PGV (cm/sec)

Point A PGV Mean Hazard Curve versus

Base Conditioned Hazard Curves used in 2007 Analyses

Source: Appendix D, Table D-1

Note: Point A is the PSHA reference rock outcrop used as the control point for site-response modeling.

Figure 6.5.1-7. Conditioned and Unconditioned Reference Rock Outcrop Mean Horizontal PGV Hazard Curves



1x10-8

1x10-7

1x10-6

1x10-5

1x10-4

1x10-3

1x10-2

1x10-1

Ann

ual F

requ

ency

of E

xcee

danc

eOriginal Point A (Mean)Mean

0.01 0.1 1 10 100PGA (g)

Point A PGA Mean Hazard Curve versus

Base Conditioned Hazard Curves used in 2007 Analyses

Source: Appendix D, Table D-1

Note: Point A is the PSHA reference rock outcrop used as the control point for site-response modeling.

Figure 6.5.1-8. Conditioned and Unconditioned Reference Rock Outcrop Mean Horizontal PGA Hazard Curves



0.01 0.1 1 10Spectral Acceleration (g)

1x10-8

1x10-7

1x10-6

1x10-5

1x10-4

1x10-3

1x10-2

1x10-1

Ann

ual F

requ

ency

of E

xcee

danc

eMean--HorizontalMean--Vertical

Source: Appendix D, Table D-1; MO0801HCUHSSFA.001 [DIRS 184802]

Figure 6.5.2-34. Mean Horizontal and Vertical Seismic Hazard Curves for PGA at SFA



0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10Spectral Acceleration (g)

1x10-8

1x10-7

1x10-6

1x10-5

1x10-4

1x10-3

1x10-2

1x10-1

Ann

ual F

requ

ency

of E

xcee

danc

eMean--HorizontalMean--Vertical


Figure 6.5.2-41. Mean Horizontal and Vertical Seismic Hazard Curves for 3.3 Sec SA at SFA



1 10 100 1000PGV (cm/sec)

1x10-8

1x10-7

1x10-6

1x10-5

1x10-4

1x10-3

1x10-2

1x10-1

Annu

al F

requ

ency

of E

xcee

danc

eMean--Horizontal


Figure 6.5.2-42. Mean Horizontal Seismic Hazard Curve for PGV at SFA


Documents

MDL-MGR-GS-000007, Rev. 00, ACN 01, 'Supplemental ... · 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 13000 14000 Velocity, feet per second. Base Case 1_Vs Base