May 1, 2012 · • Facilities: KCUSD will continue to improve current facilities, build new ones and plan for furture growth to ensure optimum learning environments. F A C I L I T

KCUSDF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

May 1, 2012

KCUSD | Mis.sion:Student Achievement: • KCUSD supports success for all students by maintaining and enhancing quality educational and co-curricular programs for students.

Our Employees:• KCUSD employees are caring professionals who are skilled, empowered and prepared to provide effective services.

Safety: • KCUSD strives to provide a safe and orderly learning environment.

Fiscal Responsibility:• KCUSD works to protect and preserve the fiscal health of the district. We strive to achieve long-term stability so that our energy can be focused on providing quality education for our students.

Facilities: • KCUSD will continue to improve current facilities, build new ones and plan for furture growth to ensure optimum learning environments.

F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School DistrictF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School DistrictF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

S P E C I A L T H A N K S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

In addition, KCUSD would like to thank the following consultants for their professional services conducted in this Facilities Master Plan process:

Special Thanks

Kings Canyon Unified School District would like to thank all of the community members and district staff who offered their time, comments, and overall vision for this Facilities Master Plan.

KCUSD Facilities Task ForceDan Ascanio

Tom Bachicha

Terry Bradley

Anita Betancourt

Gabriela Cazares

Rodney Cisneros

John Clements

Sylvia Cortez

Jim Dueck

Alex Elenes

Mike Fennacy

Carlos Garcia

Aide Garza

Joe Garza

Mark Garza

Tony Gates

Joseph Gonzalez

Roberto Gutierrez

Juana Herrera

Miguel Herrera

Ron Hudson

Robert Huebert

Bobby Ikemiya

Irv Isaak

Danny Jimenez

Dale Kennedy

Carla Lopez

Adelfa Lorenzano

Cheryl Marcelli-McLaine

School Business Consulting, for advising the District through the entire master plan process.

Darden Architects, for assisting the District in reviewing the existing school sites, developing need-related projects and project budgets, preparing this master plan report, and creating possible draft concept solutions for the issues identified at the existing school sites.

Odell Planning & Research, for studying the student enrollment growth and identifying new facility requirements.

School Facility Consultants, for analyzing the State School Facility Program (SFP) eligibility.

Keygent Advisors, for analyzing the prospective 2012 General Obligation Bond scenarios.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Trane, for energy efficient retrofit projects.

Sharon Matsuzaki

Pam Melville

Adele Nikkel

Patti Olson

Art Pena

Lana Rotan

Mike Schuil

Beckie Scroggins

Bonnie Smith

Ruth White

Gary Willems

Ryan Wood

Lonnie Work

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

SECTION 1 | Overview of the Facilities Master Plan Process ............. 2

SECTION 2 | Executive Summary ......................................................... 6

SECTION 3 | Existing Facility Needs .................................................. 12

SECTION 4 | Enrollment Projections ................................................. 50Demographic Enrollment Projections ........................................................50

Future School Locations ..................................................................................53

SECTION 5 | New School Facility Needs ............................................54

SECTION 6 | Districtwide and Community Needs ............................56

SECTION 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan ............................58Funds Currently Available ...............................................................................58

State School Building Eligibility ...................................................................59

General Obligation Bond ................................................................................63

Summary of Propositions 46 and 39/AB1908 .................................63

Comparison Between Prop. 46 and Prop. 39/AB1908 ..................64

Proposition 39 Scenarios .......................................................................65

F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

S E C T I O N 1 | Overview of the Facilities Master Plan Process

SECTION 1 | Overview of the Facilities Master Plan Process:

Needs

Identify remodels to existing facilities and identify new schools to be constructed.

Costs

Determine the capital cost required to fund these facility needs, and determine

funding strategy.

Priorities

Establish when the needs are required, and when the capital funds are required.

The Three-Part Trifecta of an FMPWhat is a Facilities Master Plan?A Facilities Master Plan (FMP) is an organizational process that defines, identifies and establishes a need for facility improvement projects. Most commonly, existing school sites are the focus of internal facility improvement projects, but the FMP process also focuses on external growth factors that define and shape the planning for future schools. The purpose of the FMP is to establish an efficient process to change the District’s facilities to both accommodate and support current and future educational programs and other tangible District-owned facility assets.

In an effort to simplify and define what an FMP can accomplish, the process can be refined into a trifecta of basic components: needs, costs, and priorities.

Needs: An identified set of facility remodels, or new construction projects.

Costs: The determined anticipated capital costs to fund the needs and also identifies a funding plan on how to fund the FMP.

Priorities: An established timing of the needs that sets the planning into actionable events.

ne

eds

P

riorit

ies costs

2

O V E R V I E W O F T H E FA C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N P R O C E S S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

OverviewThe KCUSD FMP is intended to establish a framework for the orderly development of facility improvement projects for the next 10 years.

In the process of defining the parameters and needs of the FMP, the KCUSD utilized the expertise and skill of specialty consultants, District staff and a number of community members.

Of noteworthy importance, this FMP study is intended to be a dynamic planning document, not merely a printed report on the District’s facilities. This FMP process focuses on how existing and future buildings can best serve the students, staff and community of KCUSD. That said, the FMP process is the District’s planning tool and strategy to look at and address facility improvement projects, their associated capital needs, and a financial plan to fund the projects related to the facility needs.

An FMP is a data-driven process that provides the District with the ability to move master plan needs from the conceptual, need-oriented phase, toward a vision, and finally into the ultimate reality of completed projects.

This report will present the data that has been collected, analyzed and synthesized into need-oriented projects, with associated conceptual budgets. This FMP provides the KCUSD leadership with a planning tool and road map for success.

Using the FMP as a facilities planning tool, more specific details around the master plan projects will unfold as the District defines its initial priorities for new and existing facility projects, based on available funds. The needs will likely outweigh the available capital resources. As each need is coupled with a financial budget, the District can then refine the initial priorities into a set of short-term, medium-term and long-term goals. Once these master plan priorities are set, this FMP will then be used as a planning tool to direct both the District’s human resources and capital resources.

The KCUSD FMP reflects the needs, goals and community vision that were captured and identified through several community meetings as well as an evaluation of the condition of existing schools and district administrative facilities. In an effort to align these activities with the District goals, the KCUSD’s Mission Statement was used by the committee as a standard for guiding the direction and purpose of this FMP.

This FMP is not a static document and will require review and periodic updating. For example, the FMP will require updating as the first round of prioritized projects are being completed, and also as the assessment and impact of these projects are understood. As the second round of prioritized projects is being planned, the FMP should be updated to capture any additional needs and/or changing needs that have arisen since the initial preparation of this FMP.

3


S E C T I O N 1 | Overview of the Facilities Master Plan Process

The Expanded Four-Part Facilities Master Planning Process

1. Needs

a. Define the facility needs by setting clear objectives and acquiring good data.

b. Assess and synthesize the data into a defined set of need-oriented, conceptual solutions.

c. Identify a set of existing facility needs.

d. Define a set of new facility needs.

e. Establish a set of Districtwide facility needs.

2. Costs

a. Define funding budgets that respond to the existing facility needs.

b. Define funding budgets that respond to the new facility needs.

c. Define funding budgets that respond to the Districtwide facility needs.

d. Determine funding sources.

e. Determine the limit of the funding sources.

f. Establish a financial plan.

3. Priorities

a. Define when the needs are required and when the capital funds are required.

b. Sort the needs into a set of priorities, short term (2-4 years), medium term (5-7 years) and long term (8-10 years).

4. Update the FMP

a. Execute the FMP.

b. Review and assess the impact of the FMP.

c. Update and reassess the FMP every 4 to 5 years.

1

2

344

O V E R V I E W O F T H E FA C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N P R O C E S S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

Importance of Quality School FacilitiesCompetition for student attendance has increased with the advent of school of choice, place of work, and open enrollment laws; private schools; charter schools; and other options parents have in determining which school their children attend. It is more important than ever for school districts to provide their community, staff and, most important, their students, with quality school facilities. Quality school facilities do not have to be new, but must provide students with a 21st century learning environment that is safe, clean and well maintained.

“Research has consistently shown that students’ academic performance increases when the schools they attend are clean, well maintained, and possess the classroom teaching tools that support a 21st century learning environment. Studies also show that student attendance rates increase when students know their school leaders and their communities are willing to invest in quality school facilities. Finally, the ability to attract and retain talented, high quality teachers and support staff is unequivocally related to the presence of well-maintained facilities equipped to support a 21st century learning environment; and it is quality teacher and support staff who play a significant role in students’ successful performance both in and out of the classroom.”

-Modernization Policy Sub-Committee for the “School

of the Future Report“

State Superintendent of Public Instruction, California Department

of Education

Since student achievement is impacted by specific building characteristics and effective learning environments, this FMP arms the District with an awareness of its facilities. This FMP also provides a list of facility recommendations that will allow KCUSD decision-makers to improve student achievement by enhancing the physical setting of KCUSD schools. This allows KCUSD to leverage quality schools to ensure the Mission Statement Guiding Principles are being supported.

5


S E C T I O N 2 | Executive Summary

SECTION 2 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The following list of facility needs and their associated costs is a summarization of the detailed findings presented in:

Section3 | Existing Facility Needs,•

Section 4 | Enrollment Projections, •

Section 5 | New School Facility Needs, and•

Section 6 | Districtwide and Community Needs.•

The needs represented have been derived from data from a number of sources and information, including but not limited to, individual school site input, community meetings, District staff meetings, enrollment studies, school building analysis by qualified, licensed architects, and input from the District’s support services.

Total Existing Facility Needs $82,975,000

Total New Facility Projects $121,800,000

Total Districtwide Facility Needs $34,500,000

Total Community Needs $21,000,000

KCUSD TOTAL NEEDS $260,275,000

Table 2.1 Summarized Facility Projects Total

Project Budget

6

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y | Kings Canyon Unified School District

A.L. Conner Elementary $2,094,000

Alta Elementary $6,632,000

Citrus Middle School $357,000

Dunlap K-8 School $3,677,000

Dunlap Leadership Academy $50,000

Grant Middle School $5,517,000

Great Western Elementary $3,786,000

Jefferson Elementary $2,596,000

Kings Canyon High School $1,843,000

Lincoln Elementary $5,278,000

McCord Elementary $2,488,000

Miramonte Elementary $327,000

Mountain View Independent $0

Navelencia Middle School $5,849,000

Orange Cove High School $4,198,000

Reedley High School $26,871,000

Riverview K-8 School $1,924,000

Sheridan Elementary $2,626,000

Silas Bartsch K-8 School $0

TL Reed K-8 School $1,324,000

Washington Elementary $5,538,000

TOTAL EXISTING FACILITY NEEDS $82,975,000

Table 2.2 Summarized Existing Facility Projects Total

Project Budget

Site | Existing Facility NeedsThe existing school facilities needs identified in this FMP were gathered as a result of visiting each of the school sites older than five years, talking with the school site staff, and conducting visual observations of the facilities and assessing their conditions. The KCUSD’s Mission Statement Guiding Principles were utilized to determine and shape how the built environment of the existing school sites could be transformed to support (1) student achievement, (2) KCUSD staff, (3) site safety, and (4) the learning environment. Table 2.2 summarizes the total cost for the existing facility needs projects.

7



Long-Term Costs

Orange Cove Area Elementary School $20,880,000

Reedley Area Elementary School $20,980,000

Reedley Area, High School Phase 1: Core Facility & ClassroomsPhase 2: Additional Academic Facilities

$41,570,000 $32,370,000

Total Long-Term Needs $115,800,000

Short-Term Costs

Orange Cove Area, Elementary School

Purchase Site $500,000

Develop Architectural Plans & Specifications $1,320,000

Reedley Area, Elementary School


Reedley Area, High School


Environmental Impact Reports $300,000

Other Planning Costs (Ed. Specs. Etc.) $260,000

Total Short-Term Needs $6,000,000

TOTAL NEW FACILITY PROjECTS $121,800,000

Table 2.3 Summarized New Facility Projects Total

Project Budget

Site | New Facility NeedsThe new facility needs identified in the FMP were gathered from the results of demographic enrollment projections over the next 10 years.

8


Aquatics Complex at Reedley HS $7,000,000

Aquatics Complex at Orange Cove HS $7,000,000

Completion of Stadium at Orange Cove HS $7,000,000

TOTAL COMMUNITY NEEDS $21,000,000

Table 2.4 Summarized Districtwide Projects Total

Project Budget

Table 2.5 Summarized Community Projects Total

Project Budget

Districtwide | NeedsTable 2.4 includes projects that increase academic offerings for students, improve safety throughout the District, and increase the operational efficiency of the District.

Community | NeedsTable 2.5 includes projects that enhance athletic and community offerings in the Reedley and Orange Cove communities.

Security Cameras $500,000

Districtwide Energy Efficient Retrofit Projects $5,000,000

Child Development Centers x 2 $3,000,000

Technology Improvement Projects $1,000,000

Central Valley Transportation Center, Phase 1 $12,000,000

CTE Green Education / Workforce Development $4,000,000

KCUSD Central Food Service Facility $4,000,000

TOTAL DISTRICTWIDE FACILITY NEEDS $34,500,000

9



Funds Currently Available for Capital Projects

Uncommitted capital facility funds $2,000,000

Developer fees (current and future) $5,418,000

Sub-Total $7,418,000

Funding Sources From State School Building Program

New Construction Program Eligibility $8,427,898

Modernization Program Eligibility $17,877,847 Sub-Total $26,305,745

TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS WITHOUT VOTER APPROVAL

$34,723,745 ($7,418,000 + $26,305,745)

Possible Voter-Approved General Obligation Bond

$30 Tax Rate Increase $19,500,000**

$60 Tax Rate Increase $40,000,000**

Extend Existing Tax Rate $17,200,000

TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS IF $19,500,000 BOND APPROVED

$54,223,745 ($34,723,745 + $19,500,000)


$73,723,745 ($34,723,745 + $40,000,000)


$51,923,745 ($34,723,745 + $17,200,000)

Table 2.6 Funding SourcesFinancing the Capital Facilities Master PlanSection 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan of the FMP identifies the funding sources available to the District that can be used to meet the facility needs identified in this FMP including local funds that do not require further voter-approval, State facility funds for which the District is eligible under the existing State facility program (SB 50) and three different scenarios of proceeds the District could receive from a voter-approved general obligation bond measure in 2012. Table 2.6 is a brief summary of the aforementioned funding sources.

** Tax rate increase is based on the amount listed above ($30 or $60) per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

10


Need to Establish Priorities in Implementing the FMPBased on the previously cited cost projections, KCUSD would need a combined total of $260,275,000 to meet all the facility needs identified at existing school sites; construct three new schools to accommodate expected student growth during the next 10 years; and complete district wide and community projects the increase academic programs, increase safety and reduce operational costs by increasing efficiency. It will be necessary for the district to prioritize projects identified in the FMP as the estimated available resources of approximately $51,923,745 to $73,723,745 (depending on the size of a possible general obligation bond measure) are insufficient to meet all of the identified facility needs of the District.

It will be the responsibility of the KCUSD staff (administrator, certificated and classified employees) to work with members of the community to establish facility priorities. Those determinations will be offered as recommendations to the District’s Governing Board for consideration of approval. The most critical facility needs of the District will likely be a balance between the needs of existing schools and the future needs to accommodate projects enrollment growth in the district.

11


Academics:

Building Code:

Curb Appeal:

District Goals:

S E C T I O N 3 | Existing Facility Needs

ABCD

SECTION 3 | EXISTING FACILITY NEEDS:

The range of the existing facility improvements projects identified in this FMP vary in size and form. They consist of repairs, upgrades and remodels.

After requesting Requests for Qualifications from several qualified architectural firms, the District’s Capital Facility Community Committee recommended and the Governing Board selected Darden Architects to review and assess the existing school sites and identify possible projects and their associated costs.

The existing facility Projects identified in this FMP were gathered as a result of visiting each of the school sites older than five years, talking with the school site staff, and conducting visual observations of the facilities and assessing their conditions. This process was directed toward looking at District facilities in an organized manner and engaging the school site staff on the needs of their respective schools. This process established a list of potential facility improvement projects. The solutions indicated in the existing facility needs should be viewed as conceptual only, with the understanding that actual architectural plans will be determined at a later date.

The capital needs for the existing facility projects was based upon the anticipated project costs in 2014 dollars. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non-direct costs (soft costs). The year 2014 was selected for the valuation of the dollar because it is the most probable date that the first set of prioritized projects would be ready for construction.

After assessing the school sites, many needs were similar in nature. This began to define certain need-oriented themes that could be applied across each school site. The need-oriented theme based projects could be defined as one of the following typologies:

These are need-oriented projects that enhance and improve the academic teaching spaces. These projects include improvements to the teaching stations such as new interior surfaces, lighting, mechanical and plumbing upgrades, technology system upgrades, window replacement projects and acoustical projects that all improve the sound quality within the classrooms.

These are need-oriented projects that respond to identifiable building code concerns and must/should be addressed on any future project. These projects may consist of “Access Compliance” governed by the Americans with Disabilities Act (parking lots, accessible path of travel, doors, gates, restrooms, signs, ramps and stairs), “Fire and Life Safety” (fire alarms and fire sprinklers), and “Structural Safety.”

These are need-oriented projects that improve the quality of the school sites and how the community perceives their schools. These may include such projects as entrance to the school and the parking lots, painting, roofing, fencing, trash enclosures, vehicle drop-off zones, and the overall first impression quality the school conveys to a visitor.

These are need-oriented projects that are important to the District as a whole. These may include improved and/or larger libraries and multi-use rooms, aquatic complexes, stadium improvements and synthetic tracks, safety and security, energy efficient retrofit projects, and replacing portable classrooms with permanent classrooms.

12

E X I S T I N G F A C I L I T Y N E E D S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

The following graphic site plans illustrate the existing school sites and an accompanying draft conceptual vision. The draft conceptual vision is intended to identify in graphic form the list of projects and their associated budgets. The draft concepts are not intended to illustrate the final design solution, but rather to offer a reflection and image of a project that would be suitable for the school site.

Each of the school sites will have a list of “Proposed Projects” and an associated project budget in 2014 dollars. The ‘Master Plan Project Total’ is the sum of the individual projects. This figure then represents the financial need necessary to fund the identified projects. To offset these costs, the District is eligible for funds through the State of California via the School Facility Program (SFP).

The listing of the ‘Proposed State Funding’ identifies the year and financial amount of the potential modernization eligibility grants. The ‘Available State Funds’ is the sum of potential State funded grants.

The ‘Local Funds Required’ is the difference between the ‘Master Plan Project Total’ and the ‘Available State Funds,’ and represents the adjusted financial need.

NOTE: The School Facility Program is subject to change, requires the District to match the State contribution, and it also requires the voters of the State to pass a future State school facility bond.

13

MASTEr PLAN BUILDING DESIGNATIONS

Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete

Existing Site Paving

New Site Paving

Site, Keynote Symbol

Building, Keynote Symbol

Site, Storm Drainage System

Building Designation

Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

J E F F E r S O N E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

A.L. CONNEr ELEMENTArY SCHOOL222 Fouth St., Orange Cove, CA

SCHOOLGrade Level K-5•

SITESite Acreage • 24.60 Acres

BUILDINGTotal Building Area 36,908 SQ/FT•

1 Multi-use, Kitchen

2a Classrooms

2b Classrooms / Science

3 Health Clinic

4 Administration (Relocatable)

5 Relocatable Classroom



8 Toilets Classroom


10 Storage

11 Music Classroom



EXISTING

F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E r P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

A . L . C O N N E r E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

14

M A S T E r P L A N | JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

FACILITY NEEDS: COST

Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $217,000 AMP Site Development, Amphitheater Gathering Area $287,000 B3 Building Modernization & MEP $339,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $148,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $19,000 SS Shade Structure $112,000 EN Service Yard Enclosure $36,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $14,000 H3 Hardcourts, New as indicated $102,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $16,000 O&H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $31,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $7,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $452,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $49,000 TECH Technology Equipment, Overhead Projectors $265,000

Master Plan Projects Total $2,094,000 Proposed State Funding

2011 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $540,000 2017 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $90,000 2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $529,200

Available State Funds $1,159,200

TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS rEQUIrED $934,800

MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | A.L. CONNER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

15


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

ALTA ELEMENTArY SCHOOL21771 E. Parlier Ave., Reedley, CA


SITESite Acreage • 10.00 Acres

BUILDINGTotal Building Area • 34,603 SQ/FT

1a Classrooms

1b Classrooms

2a Administration, Kindergarten

2b Multi-Purpose, Kitchen

3 Classrooms

4 Classrooms


5a Relocatable Classroom

6 Storage / Garage

7 Storage

8 Storage

9 —



12 New Library Building 48’x40’

EXISTING


EXISTING

F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E r P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School DistrictF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E r P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

A L T A E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

16


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $231,000 AMP Site Development, Amphitheater Gathering Area $288,000 B2 Portable, Move from Onsite $15,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $45,000 B4 Remodel, Kitchen $363,000 B5 Building, Library-Media $1,000,000 B5 Building, Multi-Purpose $662,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $502,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $362,000 SS Shade Structure $156,000 FW Fire Water Tank & Pump, Small Tank, w/o Generator $372,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $17,000 H3 Hardcourts, New as indicated $47,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $10,000 O&H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $29,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove, Replace & Reconfigure $172,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $803,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $62,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $278,000 SDO Site, Student Drop-off (New) $301,000 ST2 Replace Septic Tank System $223,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $694,000


2011 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $450,000 2017 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $900,000


TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS rEQUIrED $5,282,000

MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | ALTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

17


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

GrEAT WESTErN ELEMENTArY SCHOOL5051 S. Frankwood Ave., Reedley, CA


SITESite Acreage 10.10 Acres•


1a Administration

1b Kindergarten

1c Classrooms

1d Classrooms

2 Kindergarten



5 Relocatable Classroom/Library

6 Classrooms




10 Bus Barn

11 Storage

EXISTING


G r E A T W E S T E r N E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

18

GrEAT WESTErN ELEMENTArY SCHOOL5051 S. Frankwood Ave., Reedley, CA




MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | GREAT WESTERN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $95,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $89,000 B5 Building, Portable $241,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $577,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $80,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $16,000 CW Casework, Library Shelving Anchorage $7,000 FW Fire Water Tank & Pump, Small Tank, w/o Generator $372,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $15,000 O&H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $86,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $21,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove & Replace $85,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $1,141,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $65,000 POT Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $43,000 RF2 Roofing System, Patch & Repair $10,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $292,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $42,000 SD2 Valley Gutter, 4’ $29,000 ST2 Replace Septic Tanks $45,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $435,000


2009 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $97,200 2010 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $93,600 2011 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $561,600 2017 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $93,600 2018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $932,400



19


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

JEFFErSON ELEMENTArY SCHOOL1037 E. Duff Ave., Reedley, CA




1 Kindergarten, Classroom

2 Classrooms

3 Classrooms

4 Administration, Classrooms

5 Classrooms





10 Library

11 Storage

12 Storage

13 Multi-Purpose/Kitchen

14 Health Clinic

EXISTING


J E F F E r S O N E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

20


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $471,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $559,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $400,000 C1 Valley Gutter, 4’ $6,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $11,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $12,000 O&H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $35,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $38,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove & Replace $56,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $84,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $29,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $82,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $812,000


2009 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $710,732 2010 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $363,600 2016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $76,074 2017 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $403,200



JEFFErSON ELEMENTArY SCHOOL1037 E. Duff Ave., Reedley, CA




MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

21


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

LINCOLN ELEMENTArY SCHOOL374 E. North Ave.., Reedley, CA




1 Administration, Kindergarten

2 Administration,

3 Kindergarten, Classroom, Toilet

4 Classroom, Toilet

5 Classroom, Toilet

6 Classroom, Toilet



9 New Multi-use Kitchen

EXISTING


L I N C O L N E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

22


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $291,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $285,000 B5 Building, Multi-Purpose $2,210,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $162,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $340,000 C3 Site Concrete for Play Structure $117,000 SS Shade Structure & Seating $146,000 EN Service Yard Enclosure $33,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $9,000 H3 Hardcourts, New as indicated $109,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $21,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $913,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $52,000 RP Portable, Move from Off-site $43,000 TECH Technology Equipment, Overhead Projectors $265,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $282,000

Master Plan Projects Total S5,278,000 Proposed State Funding

2011 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $93,600 2017 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $97,200 2018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $1,224,000



MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | LINCOLN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

23


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


M c C O r D E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

MCCOrD ELEMENTArY SCHOOL333 Center St., Orange Cove, CA




1a Classrooms

1b Classrooms

2a Administration, Kindergarten

2b Multi-Purpose, Kitchen

2c Work Room, RSP

3 Library




7 Pump House

8 Walk-in Freezer

9 Storage

10 Student Toilets

24


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $259,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $832,000 B5 Building, Toilets $479,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $119,000 SS Shade Structure $74,000 EN Service Yard Enclosure $62,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $12,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $19,000 O&H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $82,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $290,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $58,000 POT Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $117,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $30,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $56,000





MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | McCORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

MCCOrD ELEMENTArY SCHOOL333 Center St., Orange Cove, CA




25


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


M I r A M O N T E E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

MIrAMONTE ELEMENTArY SCHOOL45912 Orchard Dr., Miramonte, CA


SITESite Acreage -•

BUILDINGTotal Building Area -•

1 Administration, Classrooms, Library

2 Classrooms

3 Garage

4 Administration, Toilet

26

MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | MIRAMONTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


Proposed Projects

C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $5,000 H1 Seal & Stripe Hardcourts $6,000 H2 Remove & Replace Hardcourts $16,000 IDB Buildings & Room ID Signs $5,000 O&H Upgrade Doors & Hardware $27,000 P1 Seal & Stripe Pavement $14,000 P2 Remove & Replace Pavement / Parking $122,000 PAINT Paint Exterior of Building $21,000 RF1 Patch & Repair Roof $64,000 SD2 Building Storm Drainage System $17,000 TR1 Upgrade Restroom Fixtures (ADA) $31,000

Master Plan Projects Total $327,000 Proposed State Funding

Not available at this time.

Available State Funds N/A


27


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


S H E r I D A N E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

SHErIDAN ELEMENTArY SCHOOL1001 Ninth St., Orange Cove, CA




1a Kindergarten

1b Kindergarten , Classrooms

2a Classrooms

2b Toilets

3 Classrooms, Administration & MPR

4 Classrooms


6 Library

28


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $176,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $522,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $76,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $121,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $8,000 SS Shade Structure & Seating $74,000 EN Service Yard Enclosure $62,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $13,000 H2 Hardcourts, Remove & Replace $48,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $20,000 O&H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $117,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $12,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $495,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $68,000 POT Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $55,000 SD1 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $106,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $67,000 TR1 Toilet Room ADA Upgrades, Fixtures $36,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $549,000





MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | SHERIDAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOl

SHErIDAN ELEMENTArY SCHOOL1001 Ninth St., Orange Cove, CA




29


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


W A S H I N G T O N E L E M E N T A r Y S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

WASHINGTON ELEMENTArY SCHOOL1250 K St., Reedley, CA




1 Classrooms

2 Relocatable Classrooms

3a Administration

3b Kindergarten / Pre-school

3c Kindergarten / Pre-school

3d Classrooms

3e Classroom

3f Library

3g Classroom

4 Classroom

5 Classroom

6 Storage

7 Staff Lounge (Non Compliant)

8 Classroom

9 New MPR & Kitchen & Toilets

30


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $279,000 AMP Site Development, Amphitheater Gathering Area $245,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $644,000 B5 Building, Multi-Purpose $2,416,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $136,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $89,000 CURB Curb Appeal, Entry Canopy $26,000 EN Enclosures $13,000 FENCE Metal Rail Security Fence $41,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $9,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $8,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $785,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $50,000 PF Playground Structure $28,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $226,000 RP Portable, Move from On-site $14,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $50,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $49,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $430,000





MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

WASHINGTON ELEMENTArY SCHOOL1250 K St., Reedley, CA




31

EXISTING



Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

D U N L A P K - 8 S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

DUNLAP K-8 SCHOOL39667 Dunlap Rd., Dunlap, CA




1 Kindergarten, Classroom, Toilet

2 Classrooms, Administration

3 Library, Administration

4 Classroom

5 Classrooms

6 Classrooms



9 Classrooms

10 Classroom

11 Garage


13 -

32

MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | DUNLAP K-8 SCHOOL


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $797,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $1,000,000 C1 ADA Ramp & Steps $205,000 DF Replace Drinking Fountain, Low-Hi $7,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $15,000 H2 Hardcourts, Remove & Replace $84,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $18,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $129,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $13,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove & Replace $396,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $95,000 RF1 Roofing System, Patch & Repair $11,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $429,000 SD1 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $35,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $93,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $349,000


2009 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $1,200,561 2014 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $140,933



33

EXISTING



Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

r I V E r V I E W K - 8 S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

rIVErVIEW K-8 SCHOOL8662 S. Lac Jac Ave., Parlier, CA


SITESite Acreage 10 Acres•


34


2 Administration

3 Classrooms, Kindergarten

4 Classrooms, Kindergarten

5 Classrooms, Toilet

6 Toilet

7 Library




11 Pump

12 Garage

MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | RIVERVIEW K-8 SCHOOL


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $386,000 B2 Building Modernization, Finishes $237,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $120,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $73,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $24,000 SS Shade Structure $36,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $8,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $16,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $70,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $25,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove & Replace $84,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $336,000 SD1 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $61,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $68,000 TECH Technology Equipment, Overhead Projectors $265,000 TR1 Toilet Room ADA Upgrades, Fixtures $33,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $80,000





35

EXISTING



Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


T . L . r E E D K - 8 S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

1

2

6

7

8

55

4

3

T.L. rEED K-8 SCHOOL1400 N. Frankwood Ave., Reedley, CA



BUILDINGTotal Building Area -•

1 Administration, Library

2 Multi-use

3 Kindergarten, Classrooms, Toilets

4 Classrooms

5 Classrooms, Music

6 Classrooms, Toilets

7 Classrooms, SDC

8 District Facility

36

MASTEr PLAN

M A S T E r P L A N | T.L. REED K-8 SCHOOL

1

2

6

7

8

55

4

3


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $193,000 B2 Building Modernization, Finishes $37,000 B4 Building Modernization, Reconfigure $76,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $70,000 EQ Storage Shelving $21,000 FENCE Mowstrip $49,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $13,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $31,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $9,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove & Replace $135,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $208,000 SA Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $17,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $178,000 SDO Site, Student Drop Off(New) $287,000

Master Plan Projects Total $1,324,000

Proposed State Funding

Not available at this time.

Available State Funds N/A


37


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

GrANT MIDDLE SCHOOL360 N. East Ave., Reedley, CA

SCHOOLGrade Level 7-8•



1 Classrooms

2 Shower / Locker

3a Classrooms

3b Classrooms

4 Classrooms

5 Administration, Library, Multi-use, Classrooms


7 Library, Relocatable Bldg



10 Relocatable Classrooms & Storage

11 Maintenance & Storage

12 FCOE Classroom

13 Gymnasium


338

EXISTING

F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E r P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District38

G r A N T M I D D L E S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $510,000 AMP Site Development, Amphitheater Gathering Area $281,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $216,000 B4 Building 14 Portab;es, Relocate $64,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $125,000 B5 Building, Multi-Purpose $550,000 C2 Site Concrete Curb & Mow Strip at Portables $14,000 SS Shade Structure $149,000 EN Service Yard Enclosure $148,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $29,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $129,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $30,000 P2 Site, Paving, Remove, Replace & Reconfigure $208,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $91,000 POT Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $40,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $411,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $35,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $89,000 TECH Technology Equipment, Overhead Projectors $265,000 TF Synthetic Track $1,418,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $714,000



2009 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $255,315 2010 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $95,225 2016 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $202,045 2018 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $411,372 2019 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $990,340



393

MASTEr PLANMASTEr PLAN

39

M A S T E r P L A N | GRANT MIDDLE SCHOOL


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

NAVELENCIA MIDDLE SCHOOL22620 E. Wahtokee Ave., Reedley, CA




EXISTING


N A V E L E N C I A M I D D L E S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

1 Multi-use, Kitchen, Administration

2 Administration


4 Classrooms, Library


6 Classrooms

7 Classrooms - Lab

8 Shower / Locker

9 Storage / Garage

10 Trailer - Workrooom


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $292,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $673,000 B5 Building, Multi-Purpose $3,309,000 BDZ Bus Drop Off Zone $125,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $142,000 SS Shade Structure & Seating $78,000 EN Enclosures $16,000 FA2 Fire Alarm System & Devices $119,000 FNC Fence $14,000 FW Fire Water Tank & Pump, Small Tank, w/o Generator $372,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $4,000 H3 Hardcourts, New as indicated $98,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $6,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $33,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $19,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $26,000 PF Baseball Diamonds, Practice Field $95,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $118,000 SD1 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $14,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $34,000 TECH Technology Upgrades Campus Wide $262,000



2011 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $106,652 2014 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $53,326

Available State Funds $159,978


MASTEr PLAN

41

M A S T E r P L A N | NAVELENCIA MIDDLE SCHOOL


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

KINGS CANYON HIGH SCHOOL10026 S. Crawford Ave., Dinuba, CA


SITESite Acreage 2.69• Acres


1a Administration, Classrooms

1b Classrooms

2 Child Care

3 Classroom

4 Pump House

5 Storage

6 Modular Classroom

7 Modular Classrooms

EXISTING


K I N G S C A N Y O N H I G H S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $81,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $179,000 B5 Building, Portable $843,000 C1 Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $18,000 SS Shade Structure & Seating $117,000 FW Fire Water Tank & Pump, Small Tank, w/o Generator $372,000 H1 Hardcourts, Seal & Stripe $3,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $8,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $49,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $7,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $14,000 RF1 Roofing System, Patch & Repair $11,000 RF2 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $37,000 SD2 Reroute Storm Drain Piping $12,000 SLSC Site Lighting & Security Cameras $14,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $76,000



2009 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $344,246

Available State Funds $344,246


MASTEr PLAN

43

M A S T E r P L A N | KINGS CANYON HIGH SCHOOL


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

1

1010 9 9 8 8

7

6

5

4433

2

2

OrANGE COVE HIGH SCHOOL1700 Anchor Ave., Orange Cove, CA


SITESite Acreage 53.24• Acres



2 Administration, Library

3 Classroom

4 Classroom, Admin., Toilet

5 Gymnasium

6 Band

6a Band Addition

7 Shower Locker

8 Classroom, Admin., Toilet

9 Science Labs

10 Classroom, Home Ec., Eng. C

11 Aquatic Complex

12 Automotive Autotronics CTE

EXISTING


O r A N G E C O V E H I G H S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

12

1

1010

12

11

9 9 8 8

7

66a

5

4433

2

2

12

1

1010

12

11

9 9 8 8

7

66a

5

4433

2

2


Proposed Projects

STDM Stadium Improvements * AQUA Aquatics Complex * B5 Building, Band Room Addition $649,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $386,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $41,000 B5 New Building - Automotive Autotronics CTE $6,000,000 RD1 Roofing System, Patch & Repair $122,000



TBD CTE State Match (50%) $3,000,000 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) Not available at this time.


TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS rEQUIrED $4,198,000* Please refer to Section 6 | District-Wide & Community Needs for estimated cost.

MASTEr PLAN

45

M A S T E r P L A N | ORANGE COVE HIGH SCHOOL


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

rEEDLEY HIGH SCHOOL740 W. North Ave., Reedley, CA


SITESite Acreage • 47 Acres


1 Performing Arts 2-5 Hex Classroom Building 6 West Hall 7, 8. 10, 11 Classroom Building 9 Cafeteria 12 Agricultural Shop 13 Business 14 Home Economics 15, 17 Science Classrooms 16 Shop 16a Ag Shop Addition 18 Auto Shop 20 Girls Gym 21 Lockers 22 Main Gym 23, 25 Music Classroom 26, 30, 46 Snack Bar 27, 31-35 Relocatable Classroom 29 Professional Devl’t Center 47 Lunch Shelter 48 Athletic Training Facility 49 New Library 45 District Warehouse 19, 24 District Building 28 Residence 36 Swine Unit 37 Shade Structure 38 Greenhouse 39 District Bus Barn 40 District Storage 41, 42 District Administration 43 District Maintenance 44 District Transportation


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


EXISTING


EXISTING


r E E D L E Y H I G H S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District


Proposed Projects

AC3 HVAC, Upgrade HVAC & Add EMS $3,544,000 AMP Site Development, Amphitheater Gathering Area $288,000 AQUA Aquatics Complex * B2 Refurbish Auditorium Seating $323,000 B3 Building Modernization, Finishes & MEP $1,298,000 B4 Building Modernization, RePurpose $1,671,000 B5 Building Modernization, RePurpose, Lecture Hall $1,914,000 B5 Building, Classrooms $593,000 B6 Building, Cold Storage $250,000 B7 Building, Elevator $245,000 B9 Building, Portable $1,605,000 B10 Building, Shops $4,839,000 B11 Building, Snack Bar $1,526,000 B12 Building, Toilets $532,000 B13 Service Yard Enclosure $156,000 C1 ADA Ramp & Steps $666,000 SS Shade Structure $186,000 EN Enclosures $341,000 EQUIP Remove & Replace Athletic Bleacher Seat Covers $102,000 EQUIP Welding Exhaust System $9,000 EXWF Remove & Replace Wall Finishes $92,000 H3 Hardcourts, New as indicated $186,000 IDB Identification Signs, Site $80,000 LIFT Wheelchair Lift $43,000 O+H Openings & Hardware Upgrade $313,000 P1 Site, Paving, Seal & Stripe $145,000 P3 Site, Parking Lot (New) $3,879,000 PAINT Paint Exterior Walls & Trim $472,000 PAINT Repaint All Exterior Walls & Soffits $67,000 POT Site Concrete & Landscaping as indicated $621,000 RD1 Roofing System, Remove & Replace $19,000 SLSC Security System Upgrades & Cameras $142,000 STDM Remove Aluminum Bleacher Seats & $14,000 Re-secure loose connections. STDM Remove & Replace Scoreboard System $43,000 STDM Remove Steel Stair Risers & Sandblast Steel Rusting. $60,000 Repair & Installed New Risers

TF Repair Synthetic Track $28,000 TR1 Toilet Room ADA Upgrades, Fixtures $55,000 TR2 Remodel, Restrooms, Super-sanitize $286,000 TR3 Remodel, Restrooms, Extensive $238,000



2011 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $11,470 2020 State SFP Modernization Match (60%) $1,393,897



1 Performing Arts 2-5 Hex Classroom Building 6 West Hall 7, 8. 10, 11 Classroom Building 9 Cafeteria 12 Agricultural Shop 13 Business 14 Home Economics 15, 17 Science Classrooms 16 Shop 16a Ag Shop Addition 18 Auto Shop 20 Girls Gym 21 Lockers 22 Main Gym 23, 25 Music Classroom 26, 30, 46 Snack Bar 27, 31-35 Relocatable Classroom 29 Professional Devl’t Center 47 Lunch Shelter 48 Athletic Training Facility 49 New Library 45 District Warehouse 19, 24 District Building 28 Residence 36 Swine Unit 37 Shade Structure 38 Greenhouse 39 District Bus Barn 40 District Storage 41, 42 District Administration 43 District Maintenance 44 District Transportation

* Please refer to Section 6 | District-Wide & Community Needs for estimated cost.

MASTEr PLAN

47

M A S T E r P L A N | REEDLEY HIGH SCHOOL


Existing Building

Area to Remodel

New Building

Site Concrete

New Site Concrete


New Site Paving





Teaching Station

LEGEND

TS

EXISTING


r E E D L E Y H I G H S C H O O L | Kings Canyon Unified School District

MASTEr PLAN

49

M A S T E r P L A N | REEDLEY HIGH SCHOOL


SECTION 4 | ENrOLLMENT PrOJECTIONS

Demographic Enrollment Projections*The purposes of the Enrollment Growth and Facility Requirements Study are to project District enrollment growth for the next 10 years and to determine the number, type, and general location of the school facilities needed to accommodate the projected growth. The study includes the following sections:

Development Activity/Potential•

Enrollment Projections•

School Facilities and Locations•

*For additional information, the detailed demographic study, Enrollment Growth and Facility Requirement Study by Odell Planning & Research Inc., can be obtained by contacting the District’s Department of Facilities Planning and Construction Management.

Development Activity/PotentialKCUSD includes the City of Reedley, City of Orange Cove, a portion of the City of Dinuba’s General Plan area and unincorporated portions of southeastern Fresno and northern Tulare Counties. All of these areas have substantial potential for growth, as indicated in applicable General Plan documents and development projections.

Residential Units PermittedDuring the 10 year period from 2001-2010, 1,776 single-family and 549 multiple-family residential units were permitted in the District. Of the total units, approximately:

45% were in the City of Reedley•

32% were in the City of Orange Cove•

23% were in the unincorporated area of the District•

Residential Units to be ConstructedDuring the next 10 years, it is estimated that approximately 1,690 additional single-family and 625 multiple-family units will be constructed in the District. Of the total units estimated, approximately:

45% will be in the City of Reedley•

30% will be in the City of Orange Cove•

13% will be in the City of Dinuba•

12% will be in the unincorporated area of the District•

S E C T I O N 4 | Enrollment Projections

50

Enrollment ProjectionsTable 4.1 summarizes the projected enrollment growth in the District for the next 10 years by grade level groupings. Chart 4.1 indicates the total enrollment of schools in the District.

It is projected that the total K-12 District enrollment will increase by 860 students during the next 10 years, with an average annual growth rate of 0.84 percent per year.

*Note: Does not include Mt. View Alternative students**Note: Includes all District students

Source: Odell Planning & Research, Inc., 2012

E N R O L L M E N T P R O J E C T I O N S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

YEAR/GRADE LEvEL 2011-12 2021-22AvERAGE ANNuAL

GROwTh RATES

K-8* 6,798 7,386 0.85%

9-12* 2,684 2,933 0.92%

K-12** 9,841 10,701 0.84%

TABLE 4.1 Projected Enrollment 2021-2022 School Year

ChART 4.1 Sum of Schools Total District K-12

51


School Facilities and LocationsWithin the next 10 years, the District will need a new elementary school in Orange Cove, and a new high school and elementary school in Reedley.

Orange Cove SchoolsThe Orange Cove area total enrollment in grades K-5 currently exceeds the operational capacity of the existing schools and will substantially exceed the operational capacity in several years. Therefore, the need for a new elementary school in Orange Cove is imminent. Because there is typically about a three to five year time span between the start of the site selection/acquisition process and the opening of a school, planning for a new Orange Cove elementary school should begin as soon as possible.

Orange Cove High School is projected to be below operational capacity for the entire projection period.

Dunlap SchoolsIndividual school projections indicate the Dunlap Elementary School enrollment is projected to increase consistently, but it will be below operational capacity until the 2020-21 school year. The maximum number the enrollment is projected to exceed operational capacity is by six students and, therefore, is considered to have adequate capacity for the entire projection period.

Dunlap Leadership Academy operates as a charter school with the students doing much of their work online. The enrollment projections for the school are slightly below operational capacity for the entire 10 year projection period.

Reedley Area SchoolsThe projections for Reedley area elementary grade enrollment indicate that total operational capacity will be approached by the 2015-16 school year and exceeded by the 2019-20 school year. Based on the projections and the District’s philosophies and practices regarding the provision of neighborhood schools, a new elementary school should be constructed in the south Reedley area in approximately five to seven years. The District has begun the process of acquiring an elementary site in the south Reedley area.

No new middle schools should be needed during the 10 year projection period. Citrus, Grant and Navelencia Middle Schools should be able to handle projected enrollments during the next 10 years.

Reedley High School currently exceeds operational capacity and will continue to exceed operational capacity throughout the projection period. Construction of a new high school in approximately five to seven years will position the District to address both the existing capacity deficiencies and the projected increase in enrollment during the latter half of the projection period. Depending on enrollment and funding/eligibility factors, it may be prudent to construct the high school in two phases. The District has begun the process of acquiring a high school site in the south Reedley area.

Kings Canyon Continuation High School

Please refer to Section 3 | Existing Facility Needs for facility needs at Kings Canyon Continuation High School.

S E C T I O N 4 | Enrollment Projections

52

Future School Locations

Reedley Area Elementary SchoolThe projections show that an elementary school will be needed in the Reedley area. The District has also decided to locate the next Reedley elementary school in the southern portion of Reedley. The most recent elementary schools were located in the eastern and northern parts of Reedley (Silas Bartsch and T.L. Reed), so a southerly location, to serve this growing area, was thought to be appropriate. Reasons (2), (3) and (4) with respect to the high school, are also applicable to the elementary school.

Orange Cove Elementary SchoolThe projections show that elementary school enrollment in Orange Cove is currently over capacity and will be substantially over capacity. During the course of this FMP, a new elementary school is needed in Orange Cove. Much of the recent growth and future growth potential in Orange Cove appears to be in the southern portion of the community. Therefore, the most appropriate location for the next elementary school may be in the southern portion of the community. The completion of a site selection study will identify the most appropriate location for the school.

Reedley Area High SchoolAs the result of a site selection process, the District has decided to place the next high school in the southern portion of Reedley. The basic reasons for this decision are as follows: (1) the current high school is in the northern portion of Reedley; (2) there are available properties of an appropriate size and shape located in a planned residential area; (3) the area can be readily provided with urban services; and (4) a high school in the south Reedley area would be appropriately positioned to serve not only the southern portion of the City of Reedley, but also the District’s territory within Tulare County (including the City of Dinuba future growth area that lies within the District).

E N R O L L M E N T P R O J E C T I O N S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

53


S E C T I O N 5 | New School Facility Needs

SECTION 5 | NEw SChOOL FACILITY NEEDS

As student enrollment changes each year, the District must be in a position to understand enrollment trends and react to the impact projected student enrollment increases or decreases will have on the Districts ability to adequately house its students in quality facilities. Because the enrollment projection over the 10 year life of this FMP referenced in Section 4 | Enrollment Projections indicates that the District will not have sufficient student capacity, it is projected the District will be required to build new schools. Since new facility projects take time to plan, the timing of when the facilities are needed is critical. In addition to projecting student enrollment over the next 10 years, this FMP identifies the changes in the student demographics, the communities where these changes are potentially to occur, and when the unmet student housing will require new facilities to house these additional students. This data informs the District as to when to time the need for new facility projects. This master plan identifies a housing strategy, and the types and sizes of the new schools.

Table 5.1 summarizes the projects required based on the Odell Planning & Research ‘Enrollment Growth and Facility Requirements Study.’

As the new facility projects were defined, the associated capital costs were estimated, gathered and defined as the capital needs required to fund these defined set of new facility projects. The capital needs for the new facility projects are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non-direct costs (soft costs). These projects were estimated in the value of today’s dollars (2012), and then cost escalated to include inflation forces of when the new facilities are required.

54

N E w S C h O O L F A C I L I T Y N E E D S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

The capital needs for the new facility projects are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These projects were estimated in the value of 2014 dollars.

Table 5.1 Enrollment Growth and Facility Requirements StudyProject Budget

Long-Term Costs

Orange Cove Area Elementary School $20,880,000

Reedley Area Elementary School $20,980,000

Reedley Area, High School Phase 1: Core Facility & ClassroomsPhase 2: Additional Academic Facilities

$41,570,000 $32,370,000

Total Long-Term Needs $115,800,000

Short-Term Costs

Orange Cove Area, Elementary School

Purchase Site $500,000


Reedley Area, Elementary School


Reedley Area, High School


Environmental Impact Reports $300,000

Other Planning Costs (Ed. Specs. Etc.) $260,000

Total Short-Term Needs $6,000,000

TOTAL NEw FACILITY PROJECTS $121,800,000

55


S E C T I O N 6 | Districtwide and Community Needs

SECTION 6 | DISTRICTwIDE AND COMMuNITY NEEDS

Districtwide NeedsWhen a given project cannot be defined as being site specific and is determined to be necessary at a Districtwide level, that project would be categorized as a Districtwide Need.

The Districtwide Need projects are those projects that either increase the academic offerings for the students, improve Districtwide safety, and/or increase the operational efficiency of the District.

Table 6.1 lists projects that have been identified as Districtwide Needs.

The capital needs for the Districtwide and community facility projects are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These projects were estimated in the value of 2014 dollars.

Security Cameras $500,000

Districtwide Energy Efficient Retrofit Projects $5,000,000

Child Development Centers x 2 $3,000,000

Technology Improvement Projects $1,000,000

Central Valley Transportation Center, Phase 1 $12,000,000

CTE Green Education / Workforce Development $4,000,000

KCUSD Central Food Service Facility $4,000,000

TOTAL DISTRICTwIDE FACILITY NEEDS $34,500,000

Table 6.1 Districtwide ProjectsProject Budget

Table 6.2 Districtwide Energy Efficient Retrofit Projects

Campus Contract Amount

Dunlap Elementary School $159,070

Orange Cove High School $197,495

Silas Bartsch $187,537

Reedley High School $265,796

Kings Canyon Kids Center $18,646

Citrus Middle School $119,514

Total Contract Amount $948,061

Districtwide Energy Efficient Retrofit ProjectsIn order to protect the District’s monthly energy payments, KCUSD reached out to PG&E to identify a set of energy saving ideas. PG&E defined a plan for KCUSD in which the District could get access to 0% financing, for up to $1,000,000 in District wide energy projects. PG&E and Trane Building Services conducted an energy audit for each school site and defined $5,000,000 in energy efficient retrofit projects (EERP).

Using PG&E on-bill financing program, the District is able to access $1,000,000 of financing at a 0% interest. The monthly payment on the District’s energy payment will be a payment neutral experience. In other words, the monthly energy savings will pay for energy efficient retrofit project costs.

56

D I S T R I C T w I D E A N D C O M M u N I T Y N E E D S | Kings Canyon Unified School District

The capital needs for the Districtwide and community facility projects are based upon the anticipated project costs for the forecasted year the facility is required. These costs include the construction costs (hard costs) and other non direct costs (soft costs). These projects were estimated in the value of 2014 dollars.

Table 6.3 Community ProjectsProject Budget

Aquatic Complex at Reedley HS $7,000,000

Aquatic Complex at Orange Cove HS $7,000,000

Completion of the Stadium at Orange Cove HS $7,000,000

TOTAL COMMuNITY NEEDS $21,000,000

Community NeedsIn the process of identifying projects at the school sites, the Facilities Master Plan ‘Task Force’ identified the community’s desire for aquatic complexes at the Orange Cove and Reedley High School sites. The aquatic complex projects would be located at the high school sites in order to best serve the community, and to allow the high school sites to expand the physical education and athletic offerings to the students.

Table 6.3 lists projects that have been identified as a community need.

57

F a c i L i t i e s m a s t e r P L a n | Kings Canyon Unified School District

s e c t i o n 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan

section 7 | FinancinG tHe FaciLities master PLan

Funds currently available for capital ProjectsBecause of excellent planning along with aggressively pursuing State capital facility funds, the KCUSD was able to complete a majority of the projects included in the previous capital Facilities Master Plan without having to expend the total amount of capital funds available. As a result, these capital funds are available to be used for partially funding the existing and new construction projects highlighted in this report.

The following is a summary of the capital facility funds that will be available to the District during the next 10 years that do not require voter approval.

Capital Facility Fund BalanceThe District currently has $2,000,000 in uncommitted capital funds that will be available to fund projects highlighted in this FMP.

Developer Fee FundsThe District currently has $918,000 in uncommitted developer fee funds and expects to collect $450,000 annually, or $4. 5 million, in developer fees during the 10 year life of the FMP. The District therefore, will have approximately $5,418,000 in developer fee funds to support this FMP.

Capital Facility Funds Available in the next 10 yearsUncommitted capital facility funds $2,000,000•

Developer Fee funds $5,418,000•

total capital Facility Funds available $7,418,000

introductionFinancing a Facilities Master Plan requires an aggressive plan that takes into consideration all possible funding options including, but not limited to, local funding options, general obligation bonds, the State school building program (Senate Bill 50), federal funding opportunities, grants for capital facility projects, and the inclusion of current capital funds available to the District. This section of the report will summarize the District’s capital funds currently available, estimate their eligible State capital facility funds for new construction and modernization projects, and identify the estimated proceeds they would receive based on three different general obligation bond measure scenarios, along with the impact of the each scenario on property tax rates. Further, this section will summarize other State and federal programs that provide funding for capital facility programs.

58

F I N A N C I N G T h E F A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

State School Building Eligibility

IntroductionThe State School Facility Program (SFP) provides funding grants for school districts to acquire school sites, construct new school facilities, or modernize existing school facilities. Although there are several “boutique” programs included in the SFP, the two major funding types available to school districts are the New Construction and Modernization programs. The New Construction grant provides funding on a 50/50 State and local match basis and the Modernization grant provides funding on a 60/40 State and local match basis. The remainder of the SFP programs are summarized under Additional State Facility Programs in this section.

Funding Sources for the SFPFunding for the SFP comes from statewide general obligation bonds approved by California voters. The State Allocation Board (SAB) is responsible for determining the allocation of State funds used for the SFP. The SAB is comprised of ten members, including three State Senators, three State Assembly Members, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Director of the Department of Finance, the Director of the Department of General Services and one person appointed by the Governor.

The Office of Public School Construction (OPSC) is staff to the SAB and is responsible for verifying applicant school districts’ eligibility, processing funding applications and administering all SAB programs including preparing regulations, policies and procedures for approval by the SAB. The OPSC also prepares the SAB meeting agendas, which serve as source documents used by the State Controller’s Office for fund releases and as historical records for all SAB decisions.

Because there has not been a State school bond measure since 2006, most of the State authorization for facility programs has been exhausted and will definitely be exhausted by the time the KCUSD will have its matching funds for new construction and modernization projects. There is a real possibility a State school bond measure will be placed on the November 2012 statewide election ballot. The eligibility amounts listed on the following pages are based on the current SFP, which is subject to modification with new legislation and/or regulation changes by the State Allocation Board (SAB).

New Construction Eligibility for KCUSDThe SFP New Construction program funding may be used to purchase and/or build new schools or classrooms for eligible K-12 students. Eligibility for this program is based upon enrollment projections and seating capacity in the District. The District must provide an equal match to the State’s contribution for projects.

New construction eligibility is calculated annually based on the October enrollment of the district. Based on a preliminary review of the District’s enrollment, the District is eligible for approximately $8,427,898 in State new construction funds.

59


S e c t i o n 7 | Financing the Facilities Master Plan

ModernizationSFP Modernization program funding is available for the renovation or replacement of existing buildings. This funding may not be used to increase the capacity at a site. Modernization eligibility is site-specific and is generated by permanent buildings over 25 years of age and portable buildings over 20 years of age.

Currently, the District has modernization eligibility totaling approximately $17,877,847 in base grant State funding through 2011. This modernization eligibility includes a draw down for the projects approved by the SAB. The District will need to update its modernization eligibility annually for each school site in order to maximize its modernization funding during the life of this FMP.

Table 7.1 provides a more detailed summary of the District’s 10 year modernization eligibility analysis.

School Site Current Funding Available 2010 Funding 2011 Funding 2012 Funding 2013 Funding 2014 Funding 2015 Funding 2016 Funding 2017 Funding 2018 Funding 2019 Funding 2020 Funding Total Funding

A.L. Conner Elementary $0 $540,000 $90,000 $529,200 $1,159,200Alta Elementary $0 $450,000 $900,000 $1,350,000Citrus Middle* $0 $0Dunlap Elementary $1,200,561 $140,933 $1,341,494Dunlap Leadership Academy* $0 $0General Grant Middle $255,315 $95,225 $202,045 $411,372 $990,340 $1,954,297Great Western Elementary $97,200 $93,600 $561,600 $93,600 $932,400 $1,778,400Jefferson Elementary $710,732 $363,600 $76,074 $403,200 $1,553,606Kings Canyon Cont. High $344,246 $344,246Lincoln Elementary $0 $93,600 $97,200 $1,224,000 $1,414,800McCord Elementary $54,000 $129,600 $1,220,400 $1,404,000Mountain View Alt.** $0 $0Navalencia Middle $0 $106,652 $53,326 $159,978Orange Cove High* $0 $0Reedley High $11,470 $1,393,897 $1,405,367Riverview Elementary $90,000 $352,800 $711,541 $1,154,341Sheridan Elementary $15,348 $288,474 $1,258,296 $1,562,118Silas Bartsch* $0 $0Thomas Law Reed Elementary* $0 $0Washington Elementary $180,000 $180,000 $936,000 $1,296,000Total per year $2,958,872 $840,899 $2,414,252 $0 $0 $194,259 $0 $1,536,415 $2,804,400 $3,279,313 $2,455,540 $1,393,897 $17,877,847

* Newer schools and do not yet generate modernization eligibility**Mountain View Alternative was opened in 1980. This site may generate modernization eligibility.

Summary of State Funding EligibilityState funds for new construction projects $8,427,898•

State funds for modernization projects $17,877,847•

Total State Funding Eligibility $26,305,745

Table 7.1 10 year Modernization Eligibility Summary Sheet | Updated to 2012 Pupil Grant Amounts

Notes: All dollar amounts are listed as the State’s share .•All dollar amounts are based on the current adjusted Modernization Grant •Amounts passed by the SAB effective as of 1-1-2011. As future modernization grant amounts change, funding may change.

Future year eligibility estimates assume no increase in enrollment. •Should enrollment increase, eligibility may increase.01/27/2012 update - this worksheet updated for 2012 pupil grant •amounts.

60


High Performance Incentive (HPI) GrantThe HPI program provides funding on a sliding scale point system based on the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS) standards. The project must meet the pre-requisites in each of the High Performance Rating Criteria (HPRC) and will receive a score based on the number of HPRC components that are included in the project. The Division of the State Architect (DSA) will review the project and will verify the final score, which will in turn determine the HPI grant amount. Based on the score, the base grant could increase from approximately 2-10%. Regulation changes, which took effect in early 2011, provide Base Incentive Grant (BIG) funding in addition to the percentage increase for the point score received. The BIG for new schools is $150,000 and $250,000 for additions and modernization projects. All funds received for high performance must be used on high performance related costs. In addition, the school district must have a resolution on file that demonstrates support for the HPI grant request as well as the intent to incorporate high performance features in future facilities projects.

Joint-Use Program (AB 16)The Joint-Use Program allows districts to obtain funding from a joint-use partner and a match from the State in order to build joint-use projects (divided into two categories). The program has a 50/50 funding split, with the State providing up to $2 million per project, depending upon grade level, site characteristics, and project scope. The joint-use partner must provide at least 50% of the local match, unless a district’s bond language meets the requirements of the education code. Facilities that may qualify for joint-use funding are gymnasiums, libraries, multi-purpose rooms, child care facilities and teacher education facilities.

New Construction Additional Grant for District-Owned Site Acquisition Cost (AB 401)This program allows districts to apply for additional new construction funding if the district is vacating non-school space that has been productively used for at least the past five years, such as administration space, and placing students into the vacated facility.

New Construction Additional Grant for Replaced Facilities (AB 801)This program provides funding for the replacement cost of single-story buildings that are demolished and replaced with multi-story buildings. In order to qualify for this funding, the project must increase capacity at the site by at least 20% or 200 pupils, whichever is greater, among other criteria.

Additional State Facility Programs The following is a brief summary of funding opportunities available to school districts for which the KCUSD could be eligible for depending upon the District securing matching funds or meeting eligibility requirements.

Overcrowding Relief Grant (ORG) ProgramThe ORG program is available to districts that have school sites that exceed a certain pupil density based on 2005/06 October enrollments. In order to reduce densities and relieve overcrowding, districts are required to remove portable classrooms from classroom use and replace them with an equal amount of permanent capacity. The eligibility for this program is based on a calculation of existing portables and does not utilize traditional SFP new construction eligibility. Districts who submit applications are provided funds based upon density ratios, from most dense sites to least dense.

Career Technical Education Facilities Program (CTEFP)CTEFP grants are available to school districts operating a comprehensive high school, and provide up to $3 million per project for new construction of Career Technical facilities and up to $1.5 million per project for the modernization of Career Technical facilities. Projects may consist of equipment only. Traditional SFP eligibility is not required and will not be adjusted for these projects. The CDE must first approve the district’s Career Technical Education Plan and proposed project. Districts must provide the anticipated costs and square footage to determine the funding amount.

Facility HardshipThis program is designed to provide funds to repair or replace facilities that have either an imminent health or safety threat, or for facilities that have been lost due to a natural disaster such as a flood, fire, or earthquake. This program requires extensive agency-supported documentation and special approval from the SAB.

61



Federal ProgramsIn a much more limited capacity than the State of California, the Federal government has provided some facility funding and financing options for California school districts. A summary of some of these options are outlined below.

Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM)PDM funds flow from FEMA to individual states and are administered in California by the California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA). The program was created when the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 amended the Stafford Act to provide a funding mechanism that is not dependent on a presidential disaster declaration. The estimated amount to California for the 2011 fiscal year is $200,000,000. PDM funding requires at least a 25% match (75% federal share of project cost).

Grants are available for the creation of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans (LHMPs) and for the implementation of mitigation projects prior to a disaster event. To apply for funding, applicants must complete a Notice of Interest (NOI) available on the CalEMA website. Eligible applicants who submit an NOI for an eligible activity will be given the code to access the Federal eGrants system to complete an application.

School districts and Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) with LHMPs, which are part of a multi-jurisdictional LHMPs, are eligible applicants. Please note, the fiscal year 2011 Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) application period opened on June 1, 2010 and is currently closed. However, this program operates in an annual funding cycles based on the fiscal year.

Please note, funds are allocated when FEMA approves the application and they must be used within 18 months of FEMA approval.

Safe Routes to SchoolsThere are two separate Safe Routes to Schools programs administered by CalTrans. There is the State program know as SR2S and the Federal program known as SRTS. The programs aim to improve and enhance the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by improving related infrastructure such as sidewalks, trails, traffic calming/control devices, and bike paths.

SR2STo date there have been nine program cycles for the California Safe Routes to School Program. A 10th cycle was recently announced on December 20, 2011, with a target funding amount of $45 million. Applications for Cycle 10 are due on March 30, 2012. Typically, applicants must be any incorporated city or a county within the state of California. SR2S applications should be submitted to the attention of your Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer.

SRTSTo date there have been two program cycles for the Federal Safe Routes to School Program. The projects list for Cycle 3 was approved on October 17, 2011, for $66 million in Federal funding.

62


General Obligation Bonds

IntroductionGeneral Obligation Bonds are the major source of local revenue for capital facility projects. From June 1978 with the passage of Proposition 13, until June 1986, school districts were prohibited from even placing a general obligation bond measure on the election ballot for voters to determine if they desired to use this alternative as a local source for funding capital facility projects. However, in June 1986, California voters approved Proposition 46 that amended Proposition 13 to allow local school districts to place general obligation bond measures on the election ballot for consideration by the voters of the district. Passage of Proposition 46 bonds require a 2/3 (66.7%) majority vote for passage.

With the passage of Proposition 39 in November 2000, school districts now have another option for placing general obligation bond measures on the election ballot for consideration by district voters. This type of bond measure is attractive to school districts because it only requires a 55 percent majority vote for passage. However, if districts select this alternative, there are several factors districts must consider and implement if the bond measure is to be successful.

Although both bond measure options are available to school districts, most school districts select Proposition 39 bonds because of the lower passage rate. The following is a summary of Proposition 46 and 39 bond measures, followed by Table 7.2 which summarizes the differences between the two bond measures.

Summary of Prop. 46 & 39 / AB1908

Proposition 46 June 1986 State Primary Election•

Reinstated ability for voters to approve general obligation bonds •with 2/3rds (66.7%) voter approval

Limitations on Outstanding Indebtedness•

2.5% of Assessed Valuation (AV) for unified school districts•

1.25% of AV for elementary and high school districts•

Proposition 39Approved by voters in November 2000•

Reduced bond measure passage vote from 2/3 (66.7%) majority •to 55% majority

Imposed several new controls on school districts•

Assembly Bill 1908Legislation passed to implement Proposition 39•

Purpose was to defuse opposition arguments against 55% vote•

Imposed tax rate maximums:•

Unified School Districts $60 per $100,000 of Assessed Valuation

High School/Elementary District $30 per $100,000 of Assessed Valuation

Reduced number of dates to conduct Proposition 39 elections•

63


Table 7.2 Comparison between Proposition 46 and Proposition 39/AB1908

Items Proposition 46 (66.7% Vote) Proposition 39/AB 1908 (55% Vote)

Requirement to Call for Bond Election Simple Majority Vote of Board 2/3 Majority Vote of Board

Minimum Affirmative votes Two-Thirds (66.7%) of Votes Cast 55% of Votes Cast

Facilities Eligible to be Financed with Bonds

Purchase or Improvement of Real Property (Purchase of Land, Construction of Buildings, and Acquisition or Construction of Permanent Improvements to Land or Buildings)

Construction, Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, or Replacement of School Facilities, and the Acquisition or Lease of Real Property

Purchase of Furniture and Equipment No Yes

Election Dates Any Tuesday Coincide with Regularly Scheduled Local Election in Odd-Numbered Years or in Even-Numbered Years

First Tuesday in June•First Tuesday after First Monday in November•

Maximum Annual Tax Per Bond Election Based on Projected Assessed Valuation and Interest Rate over Life of Bond - Actual Tax Rate Could Be Higher

Not Limited. Tax is Determined Annually Based on Bond Payment and Assessed Value

Unified Districts - $60 per $100,000 of Assessed Valuation

High School/Elementary Districts - $30 per $100,000 of Assessed Valuation

Accountability Requirements None except expenses limited to real property acquisitions and improvements

List of the specific projects to be funded from Bonds

An annual Performance Audit

An annual Financial Audit

Citizens Oversight Committee None required Independent committee appointed by Governing Board

Review and report on the expenditure of Bond proceeds

District to provide technical and administrative assistance

Membership of at least seven members, representing business community, seniors, taxpayers, parents, and PTA

Members limited to two consecutive two year terms

No committee membership for school employees, officials, vendors, contractors, or consultants to school district

Public meetings subject to the Brown Act

Charter School Funding None Make available facilities reasonably equivalent to district facilities for “in-district” students with/without bond measure

Evaluate safety, class size reduction and Information Technology

None Board must certify these issues were considered


64


Proposition 39 Tax Rate Extension Request voters to extend the 2011-12 tax rate of $103.17 per $100,000 of assessed value such that the Election of 2012 bond tax rate does not exceed $60 per $100,000 of assessed value (Proposition 39 maximum.) Table 7.4 is a summary of this tax rate extension scenario.

Proposition 39 ScenariosAlthough the District could place a Proposition 46 bond measure on the election ballot, the following scenarios are based on following the requirements of Proposition 39 bond measures which limit the size of the bond measure but only require a 55 percent majority vote, compared to the 2/3 (66.7%) requirement under Proposition 46. The three scenarios that follow are based on annual tax rates ranging from no increase in the current tax rate to an increase of $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

Proposition 39 Tax IncreaseRequest voters to authorize a new annual tax in an amount of either $30 or $60 (Proposition 39 maximum) per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

An increase in the tax rate of $30 would generate $20 million in bond proceeds, while a $60 increase would realize $40 million in bond proceeds. Table 7.3 is a summary of when the bonds could be sold in order for the projected taxes to remain at either $30 or $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

(1) Issuance schedule for illustrative purposes only. Actual amounts and dates will be tailored to the District’s facility needs.

(2) Outstanding bonds include projected issuance in 2012 of Election of 2006, Series C bonds.

Issue Issue Date$30 New Tax

Proceeds$60 New Tax

Proceeds

Series A February 2013 $5,000,000 $10,000,000

Series B August 2015 $5,000,000 $10,000,000

Series C August 2017 $5,000,000 $10,000,000

Series D August 2019 $5,000,000 $10,000,000

Total $20,000,000 $40,000,000 (1) Issuance schedule for illustrative purposes only. Actual amounts and dates will be tailored to the District’s facility needs.

(2) Outstanding bonds include projected issuance in 2012 of Election of 2006, Series C bonds.

Issue Issue Date Proceeds

Series A February 2013 $4,300,000

Series B August 2015 $4,300,000

Series C August 2017 $4,300,000

Series D August 2019 $4,300,000

Total $17,200,000

Table 7.4 Proposition 39 Tax Rate ExtensionProspective Issuance Schedule (1)

Table 7.3 Proposition 39 Tax Increase OptionProspective Issuance Schedule (1)

65

Building Hope by Planning the Future

KCUSDF A C I L I T I E S M A S T E R P L A N | Kings Canyon Unified School District

Documents

May 1, 2012 · • Facilities: KCUSD will continue to improve current facilities, build new ones and plan for furture growth to ensure optimum learning environments. F A C I L I T