23
Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks, MPH American Public Health Association Annual Meeting Chicago, Illinois November 2, 2015 This project was made possible through cooperative agreement number 1U38OT000161 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO).

Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal

Immunization

Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks, MPH

American Public Health Association Annual MeetingChicago, Illinois

November 2, 2015

This project was made possible through cooperative agreement number 1U38OT000161 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO).

Page 2: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Presenter Disclosers Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH

The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation

existed during the past 12 months:

No relationships to disclose

Page 3: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Program Implemented by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG)

ACOG is a medical specialty society which includes

95% of board-certified ob-gyns and has over 58,000 members.

Ob-gyns provide 44% of preventive care visits for women over age 18.

ACOG has a strong history of promoting routine vaccination of women in ob-gyn practices.

85% of deliveries attended by ob-gyns

Page 4: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Vulnerable Populations Project

ACOG was funded by CDC through ASTHO to identify and address barriers to influenza immunization in pregnant women.

Coordinated with ASTHO and other project partners to disseminate ACOG resources on Influenza Vaccination in Pregnancy.

Conducted a pilot project adapting the Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (FIMR) methodology to examine maternal influenza cases that resulted in hospitalization. Program called Maternal Influenza Review Program (MIRP).

Page 5: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Pregnant women are more severely affected by influenza compared to the general population.

Are more likely to develop severe illness and to die than the general population.

Increased severity of influenza believed related to physiologic changes in pregnancy.

Maternal influenza can affect infant outcomes; increased rates of fetal death and prematurity have also been documented.

Description of Problem: Influenza During Pregnancy

Page 6: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Description of Problem: Maternal Influenza Immunization Rates

Many pregnant women remain unvaccinated, and are hospitalized each year with influenza or complications from influenza.

2014-15 median overall rate for seasonal influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women was 50.3%.

ACOG and CDC recommend influenza vaccination for women who will be pregnant during influenza season.

Page 7: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Maternal Influenza Review Program: Description of Project

Pilot project utilized the FIMR methodology. Selected 4 states which each reviewed approximately 15 cases of pregnant women hospitalized with influenza during 2012-13.

Retrospective review of quantitative and qualitative data via chart abstraction and maternal interview.

ACOG developed a training guide, data abstraction and maternal interview forms.

Goal: Identify potentially preventable systems and educational barriers resulting in hospitalization of pregnant women due to influenza and make

recommendations for improvement.

Page 8: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Fetal and Infant Mortality Review

What FIMR is:• Identifies local system weaknesses and issues• Used to better understand all factors leading

to an infant death• Includes and highly values input from

mothers who have lost an infant

through the maternal interview• Facilitates community action and

improves systems • Is a continuous quality improvement

model

Page 9: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

States Funded

Colorado Department of Public Health Minnesota Department of Health New York State Department of Health Rhode Island Department of Health

Page 10: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Project Protocol 1) Case Identification

An “influenza case” was defined as diagnosed influenza in a hospitalized pregnant women at any stage of gestation upon discharge during the 2012-13 influenza season.

 2) Data Abstraction

States collected information on maternal influenza care, prenatal care, labor and delivery, newborn care, post-partum/reproductive health care, and pediatric care (birth – 6 months).

Provided with data abstraction forms with immunization module

3) Maternal Interview Each state made concerted efforts to interview the mothers using the

Maternal Interview Abstraction form. Identifying information was de-identified.

Page 11: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Project Protocol 4) Case Review  

State convened a Case Review Team (CRT) Developed recommendations to address some of the systems issues

identified during case reviews. Considered ways to implement some of the developed

recommendations.

5) Summary of Findings & Recommendations for Systems Improvement

Based on the Case Review Team findings and recommendations, ACOG’s Immunization staff and Immunization Expert Work Group, will develop a summary report with recommendations for increasing maternal influenza immunization.

Page 12: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Eligible Cases Colorado• 39 pregnant women hospitalized with influenza in 5-county Denver area

Minnesota • 23 pregnant women hospitalized with influenza in Minneapolis- St. Paul

New York • 28 pregnant women hospitalized with influenza in 15 county capital area

and Western regions

Rhode Island • 23 pregnant women hospitalized with influenza in Providence county.

Page 13: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Data Abstraction Summarized relevant medical and psychosocial chart information on each

case. Including immunization history in pregnancy. Data abstraction provides an in-depth look at care each woman received. Since one of goals of case review is to identify systems issues that may

have contributed to woman contracting influenza in pregnancy, all related medical and psychosocial information about hospitalization for influenza may be important to the review.

Abstractor does not include any identifying information on the data abstraction form.

A case summary is then developed for the case review meeting which consists of most important medical and maternal interview findings.

Page 14: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Maternal InterviewImportant to get information about woman’s hospitalization in

her own words. States had difficulty reaching some of the women. Number of

maternal interviews conducted: CO:11, RI: 7, MN: 5, and

NY: 12. • All 4 states found maternal interviews informative. • Provided additional information not found in charts, such as

why they refused flu vaccine, when and where received vaccine, and if it was offered at subsequent visits.

Page 15: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Case Review

Case Review Team (CRT) reviewed and analyzed de-identified case review summary developed for the meeting which consisted of relevant findings from both the medical record data abstraction and maternal home interview.

Members included individuals who will bring diversity, influence, commitment, and consumer participation.

CRT developed recommendations to address systems issues identified during case review.

Discussed ways to implement some of the recommendations.

Page 16: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

State CRT Vaccinated Unvaccinated Unknown

Colorado 17 10 7 0

Minnesota 18 15 2 1

New York 12 9 3 0

Rhode Island 11 7 4 0

Summary of Vaccination Data Obtained

Page 17: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Recommendations

Further training of providers to better identify influenza among pregnant women.

Educate patients on the risks of influenza during pregnancy, risk reduction, and provide a strong recommendation for vaccination.

Educate urgent care clinics on how to manage pregnant patients with flu-like symptoms and to understand the guidelines for administering antiviral medication to pregnant women.

Need for better integration of care between primary care, ob-gyn, and hospital.

Page 18: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Recommendations

Additional patient education needed for those refusing vaccine. Need for providers to also educate about risks of not getting immunized.

Educate patient about limiting her contact with those sick or not vaccinated.

Provide more options for free flu vaccines for pregnant women and their partners who may not have insurance.

Page 19: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Summary Recommendations

ACOG has identified several common themes and recommendations:

Systems Level Inconsistent documentation of immunization recommendationsLack of consistency among providers in regards to infection control

regulations in labor and delivery unitsUnder-education of urgent care center and emergency room staff on the

assessment and treatment of pregnant women presenting with influenza-like-illness. This includes differentiating between normal side effects of pregnancy and symptoms of influenza.

Page 20: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Summary RecommendationsMany ob-gyns do not offer influenza vaccine in their offices. Patients trust

their ob-gyn; referring patients elsewhere increases the risk of women going unvaccinated. Ob-gyns need to start recommending and offering influenza vaccine.

Inability of family members to get vaccinated due to insurance coverage issues or provider’s inability to vaccinate family (i.e. ob not being able to vaccinate a father or a pediatrician not being able to vaccinate a parent)

Immunizations need to be further integrated into EMRs and tailored for ob-gyn providers

Adult immunization registries are underused but may be a good way to document and track immunization records

Page 21: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Summary RecommendationsEducationalConcerns over vaccine safety among patients need to be addressedSimilarly, misconceptions about influenza vaccine need to be debunked. i.e.

“the flu vaccine isn’t effective” or “the flu vaccine will make me sick”Messaging needs to focus on the increased risk of severe illness and

complications during pregnancyProviders need to take time to discuss influenza vaccine with their patients

and if patients decline, need to have the conversation at each subsequent visit

Page 22: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Conclusion • All 4 states agreed that this pilot study using the FIMR methodology was

very informative, and provided them with useful information that could be used to improve systems issues. Having the case review information de-identified made it easier to discuss systems issues.

• States are hopeful that there will be an opportunity to convene a Community Action Team to implement many of their recommendations. Two of the states, CO and RI are currently doing this.

• In future years of the project ACOG will create a toolkit for other states to use as resource to implement their own MIRP program.

Page 23: Maternal Influenza Review Program: Identifying Barriers to Maternal Immunization Ellen Hutchins, ScD, MPH, Sarah Patterson Carroll, MPH, and Debra Hawks,

Special Thanks To:

Colorado Department of Public healthRhode Island Department of HealthNew York Department of HealthMinnesota Department of HealthThe Association of State and Territorial Health OfficialsThe Centers for Disease Control and PreventionNational Fetal and Infant Mortality Review Program