Click here to load reader
Upload
phungtuyen
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Materials And Method
The present in vitro study was conducted in the Subharti
University, Meerut and Research lab of Cimec Technologies Pvt.
Ltd., Anand Industrial Estate, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad, India. The
purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of
samples with the relative loss of PCD followed by the use of
intraradicular & intracoronal restoration and reinforcement
material.
Equipments & Materials used in the study
Specimen cleaning & storage:
1) Ultrasonic scaler (Woodpecker DTE D5, China).
2) 1% Chloramine-T (Hi Media Labs, India).
Specimen preparation:
1) Round Bur BR-45 ISO 001/010 ; straight bur ISO
109/013, SF-31, Mani Inc. Kiyohara Industrial Park, Tochigi,
Japan.
2) Air rotor handpiece (NSK, Japan)
3) Straight handpiece and motor (Marathon, India)
Page 85
Materials And Method
4) Endo Access Bur (Dentsply, Mallifer Ballaigus,
Switzerland)
5) Normal Saline (Nirlite, India).
6) Digital vernier calliper. (SPAC Systems, Japan).
7) Glass slab
Endodontic shaping & cleaning:
1) EndoBloc (Dentsply, Mallifer Ballaigus, Switzerland).
2) K- files of size #10 - #30 : 21mm and 25mm (Dentsply
Malliefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
3) Protaper rotary system files (Dentsply Malliefer,
Ballaigues, Switzerland)
4) Endodontic Torque Control Motor: X Smart (Dentsply,
Mallifer, Ballaigues Switzerland).
5) RC-Prep lubricant (Premier Dental Products, Tulsa, UK).
6) 5.25 % Sodium hypochlorite (Amble healthcare pvt. ltd.,
New Delhi)
7) Distilled Water (B.K. chemicals, India).
8) 30 gauge 1, 2ml and 5ml Syringe (Dispovan, India).
9) Avue prep liquid EDTA (Dental Avenue, India)
Page 86
Materials And Method
Obturation:
1) Paper Points (Dentsply Malliefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
2) Lentulospiral (Dentsply Malliefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland).
3) Protaper Cones (Dentsply Malliefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)
4) AH plus resin Sealer (Dentsply Malliefer, Ballaigues,
Switzerland).
Intracoronal restorative materials:
1) Nanofilled Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement- Nano-
ionomer Ketac N100 (3M/ESPE, St Paul, MN,USA).
2) Temporary cement (MD Temp,Meta Biomed,USA).
Instruments used for intracoronal restoration
1) Agate spatula (API, Ashoosons Dental Equipments.India)
2) Mixing pad (3M/ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA)
3) Teflon coated Composite instruments (Hu-Friedy, Germany)
4) Pro-matrix disposable band and retainers (Astek
innovations, UK)
Mounting of specimens:
1) Self curing acrylic (Rapid repair, Ashvin, Mumbai, India).
2) Stainless steel blocks (Tianjin haiqianwei pipe co. ltd, India).
3) Elastomeric Impression material (Aquasil, 3M, USA)
Page 87
Materials And Method
Equipments:
1) Stereomicroscope (Alco, India)
2) Light curing unit (Unicorn, India)
3) Incubator (Weiss Gallenkam, Germany)
4) Universal testing machine (Micronix, Korea) with stainless
steel fixtures and hardened steel chisel.
5) Thermocycling apparatus (custom made)
Methodology
Sample Preparation:
A total of one hundred ninety extracted human mandibular molar
teeth with two roots were selected after approval from ethical
committee and used for this study (Fig.11).In order to standardize,
anatomic crowns with similar dimensions (11±1 mm mesiodistal
and 10±1 mm buccolingual diameters) were measured with a
digital caliper (Fig. 2).
Soft tissue deposits and calculus were removed with an
ultrasonic scaler. Teeth were stored in 1% chloramine-T solution
for 12 hours and transferred to distilled water until use (Fig. 10).
Page 88
Materials And Method
Exclusion Criteria
• Single root and Multiple roots (more than two).
• Previous root canal treatment.
• Roots with abrupt canal curvatures.
All the teeth were examined under a stereomicroscope at 10 X
magnification to ensure the absence of pre-existing cracks or
fractures (Fig. 3). Crowns were resected so that a final dimension
of 4 mm measured from one mm below highest point of proximal
cervical line is achieved (Fig. 13). Then, the depth grooves were
prepared in the enamel and it was carefully removed with a
diamond abrasive point from all the surfaces (Fig. 14, 15).The
samples were examined under a stereomicroscope to ensure
complete removal of enamel.
Endodontic access preparation:
Endodontic access cavities were prepared with round bur # 2 and
Endo access bur used in a high speed handpiece under constant
water cooling. The access was prepared in accordance with the
dimensions of the pulp chamber and straight line access was
ensured (Fig. 16). The Samples for control group were prepared till
Page 89
Materials And Method
this step with no biomechanical preparation of root canal .Only the
debris was removed from the pulp chamber and the canal with
copious saline irrigation. The patency was checked with 15 K- file
with no preparation of root canal at all. Rest all the samples
followed the procedure described below.
The patency was checked with 15 K- file .The working length was
determined by placing a 15 K- file into the canal until it was just
seen at the apical foramen and then 1mm was subtracted from this
length.
Shaping and cleaning of root canal system:
Root canal therapy was carried out following standardized
procedure for all the samples. A size 15 K- file was used to
negotiate the root canal. Mesial and distal root canals were then
instrumented with Rotary ProTaper in a sequential manner till F3
using crown down technique in accordance with manufacturer’s
recommendation for torque, speed and sequence of files. During
the procedure, patency and glide path verification was done with
size 10 K- file.2 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite was used to
irrigate the prepared canals after every instrumentation. The root
Page 90
Materials And Method
canals received a final irrigation of 5 ml 17% EDTA, after which the
canals were flushed with 10 ml distilled water to avoid the
prolonged effect of EDTA. Root canals so prepared were dried
with protaper paper points.
Root Canal Obturation:
Root canal preparation was judged to be complete when tug-back
was achieved with a corresponding protaper guttapercha point at
working length. The cleaned and shaped canals were then dried
with paper points before obturation. Obturation of the prepared
root canals was done with the Protaper universal gutta percha
points using single cone technique and AH Plus sealer .The
manipulation of sealer was done in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions. The root canals were coated with
sealer using lentulospiral. The cones were also coated with sealer
and placed in the canal at the predetermined working length. The
extra Gutta Percha protruding out of the orifices was seared off
with a heated instrument and the chamber was cleaned off the
excess sealer. The samples at this stage were left in the incubator
(Fig. 5) for 24 hrs to ensure complete setting of the sealer (Fig.
17).
Page 91
Materials And Method
Table 1: Composition of materials used for intraradicular and
intracoronal reinforcement
Materials Used Composition
Protaper Gutta Percha Cones (Fig 6)
Gutta Percha ,wax/resin, zinc oxide,barium
sulfate
AH Plus Sealer (Fig 7)
Paste A: Bisphenol-A epoxy resin, Bisphenol-
F epoxy resin, calcium tungstate, zirconium
oxide, silica and iron oxide pigments. Paste
B: Dibenzydiamine, aminoadamante,
trycyclodecane- diamine, calcium tungstate,
zirconium oxide, silica and silicone oil.
Ketac N 100 (Nano- filled RMGIC/Nano-ionomer) (Fig 8)
HEMA (hydroxyethylmethacrylate) or BIS-
GMA (bisphenol-glycidylmethacrylate)
fluoroaluminosilicate glass together with
silica/zirconia nanofillers (5.25nm) and
nanoclusters (1.0-1.6µm) – 69% by weight
Temporary cement (MD Temp) (Fig 9)
Zinc Oxide, Zinc sulphate, Poly vinyl acetate
copolymer, Ethanol.
Thereafter, gutta percha was removed from the intraradicular
space with a heated periodontal probe followed by a small round
bur so that the final depth of preparation was 8 mm as measured
Page 92
Materials And Method
from the occlusal end of the sample (Fig.18,19).The debris was
cleared from the intraorifice preparation and intracoronal space.
Quantification of PCD and standardisation of sample
distribution for groups:
All the specimens treated endodontically in this project will be
included for quantification. A customised apparatus was fabricated
using a glass slab and a syringe (Fig. 20). A 2 ml plastic syringe
was cut into a cylinder of 8 mm height and ends of the cylinder
were smoothened with a 100 grit sand paper. One end of the cut
cylinder was pasted on the surface of the glass slab with
cyanoacrylate (Fig. 21,22). The cylinder was filled with water with a
1 ml syringe with a least count of 0.01ml. The volume of that
cylinder was measured and noted (X) (Fig.23).Then, the pulp
chamber of the samples and intraradicular space was filled with
water and volume was noted (Y) (Fig. 24). Thereafter, the sample
was inverted, inserted and placed in the cylinder (Fig.25).The
remaining space in the cylinder was filled with water and measured
(Z) (Fig. 26).
Volume of PCD = X – (Y+Z)
Page 93
Materials And Method
The values so obtained will be noted and then the samples were
divided amongst groups in such a manner that all the groups got
samples with equally distributed highest, lowest and average
values of PCD. This distribution helped to standardise samples
within groups.
Sample preparation, Intraradicular and intracoronal
reinforcement of PCD:
Control group : The pulp chamber exposed due to access
preparation will be filled with temporary cement after cleaning
debris in the pulp chamber with saline (Fig. 27).
Research group 1: The pulp chamber and introrifice space of
endodontically treated samples as mentioned in sample
preparation will be filled with temporary cement (Fig. 28).
Research group 2: The pulp chamber and introrifice space of
endodontically treated samples as mentioned in sample
preparation filled with nano-ionomer (Fig. 28).
Research Group 3: The mesial wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the mesial ridge of PCD) with a Page 94
Materials And Method
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
will be restored with temporary cement after cleaning debris with
saline (Fig. 29).
Research Group 4: The mesial wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the mesial ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
will be restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 29).
Research Group 5: The distal wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the distal ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
will be restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 29b).
Research Group 6: The distal wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the distal ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
Page 95
Materials And Method
will be restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 29b).
Research Group 7: The buccal wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the buccal ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur . The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
will be restored with temporary cement after cleaning debris with
saline (Fig. 30).
Research Group 8: The buccal wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the buccal ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
will be restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 30).
Research Group 9: The lingual wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the lingual ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
Page 96
Materials And Method
will be restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 31).
Research Group 10: The lingual wall of endodontically treated
samples will be removed in standardized manner (3 mm width and
3 mm height as measured from the lingual ridge of PCD) with a
straight bur. The intracoronal and intraradicular space of samples
will be restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 31).
.Research.Group 11: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed all around the endodontically treated samples and after
that the pulp chamber and introrifice space of samples will be
restored with Temporary cement after cleaning debris with saline
(Fig. 32).
Research Group 12: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed all around the endodontically treated samples and after
that the pulp chamber and introrifice space of samples will be
restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris with saline (Fig.
32).
Page 97
Materials And Method
Research Group 13: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed from the inside mesial access wall of the endodontically
treated samples and after that the intracoronal and intraradicular
space of samples will be restored with Temporary cement after
cleaning debris with saline (Fig. 33).
Research Group 14 : 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed from the inside mesial wall of the endodontically treated
samples and after that that the intracoronal and intraradicular
space of samples restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris
with saline (Fig. 33).
Research Group 15: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed from the inside distal wall of the endodontically treated
samples and after that the pulp chamber and introrifice space of
samples restored with Temporary cement after cleaning debris
with saline (Fig. 34).
Research Group 16: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed from the inside distal wall of the endodontically treated
samples and after that the that the intracoronal and intraradicular
Page 98
Materials And Method
space of samples restored with nano-ionomer after cleaning debris
with saline (Fig. 34).
Research Group 17: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed from the inside mesial and distal wall of the
endodontically treated samples and after that the intracoronal and
intraradicular space of samples will be restored with Temporary
cement after cleaning debris with saline (Fig. 35).
Research Group 18: 1mm of uniform tooth structure will be
removed from the inside mesial and distal wall of the
endodontically treated samples and after that that the intracoronal
and intraradicular space of samples will be restored with
nanoionomer after cleaning debris with saline (Fig. 35).
Intra-radicular Obturation and Intra-coronal (8mm)
Restoration
Primer was applied using applicator tip to the entire surface and
massaged over the entire area for 15 seconds. A gentle stream of
air was used to spread primer into a thin even film.
Page 99
Materials And Method
It was cured for 10 sec. A cement spatula was used to mix the
pastes for 20 sec until a uniform color was achieved and the
Page 100
Materials And Method
Table 2: Intra-radicular Obturation and Intra-coronal (8 mm)
Restorations in different groups
Control Group and Research GroupsIntracoronal and intraradicular (8mm) Restoration
Control Group (No root canal treatment) Temporary cement
Research Group 1 (RCT and Intact sample) Temporary cement
Research Group 2 (RCT and Intact sample) Nano-ionomer
Research Group 3(mesial wall of access preparation removed)
Temporary cement
Research Group 4(mesial wall of access preparation removed)
Nano-ionomer
Research Group 5(distal wall of access preparation removed) Temporary cement
Research Group 6(distal wall of access preparation removed) Nano-ionomer
Research Group 7(buccal wall of access preparation removed)
Temporary cement
Research Group 8(buccal wall of access preparation removed)
Nano-ionomer
Research Group 9(lingual wall of access preparation removed)
Temporary cement
Research Group 10 (lingual wall of access preparation removed)
Nano-ionomer
Research Group 11(1mm all around tooth structure removed) Temporary cement
Research Group 12 (1mm all around tooth structure removed)
Nano-ionomer
Research Group 13 (1mm inside mesial wall removed) Temporary cement
Research Group 14 (1mm inside mesial wall removed) Nano-ionomer
Research Group 15 (1mm inside distal wall removed) Temporary cement
Research Group16 (1mm distal wall removed) Nano-ionomer
Research Group 17(1mm mesial and distal wall removed) Temporary cement
Research group 18 (1mm mesial and distal wall removed) Nano-ionomer
Page 101
Materials And Method
preparation was restored incrementally in a depth of 2 mm in
intraradicular space followed by intracoronal space in further
increments of 2 mm each. Each increment was light cured as per
manufacturer’s recommendations. Each increment was cured for
20 sec by holding the light tip guide as close as possible to the
sample. For samples with missing walls, Pro-matrix (Astek
innovations, UK) matrix band and retainer system was used.
Thermocycling of samples
The thermocycling of samples was done in a customised
apparatus (Fig..38, 40) The ISO TR 11450 recommended protocol
of 500 cycles in water between 5 and 55 degrees C with a dwell
time of 20 secs. and transfer time of 5 secs was used (Fig..39).
Simulation of Periodontal ligament & Mounting of samples
before testing:
The root surfaces of samples were dipped into melted modeling
wax in a wax bath to a depth of 1 mm below the CEJ to produce a
thin, uniform layer (Fig 41).Thereafter, each tooth was aligned
vertically along their long axis in self-curing acrylic resin (Quick
Ashvin, India) filled in 15 x 15 x 25 mm dimension (length x
breadth x height) stainless steel blocks at a level 1mm apical to
Page 102
Materials And Method
cement-enamel junction (Fig 42). After polymerization, each tooth
was removed from the block (Fig 43). The wax spacer was
removed from the root surface and the simulated alveolus of
acrylic resin blocks (Fig 44).Light bodied Vinyl Polysiloxane
elastomeric impression material was delivered into acrylic resin
blocks and the tooth was reinserted into alveolus and the material
was allowed to set (Fig 45). Excess polysiloxane material was
removed with a scalpel blade (Fig 46, 47).
Testing of samples for fracture in universal testing machine:
Thereafter, the samples were mounted on a universal testing
machine and fastened with the help of clamps which was fixed to
lower arm of universal testing machine (Fig 49, 50). A custom
stainless steel loading fixture screwed to the top of machine and
with a 4 mm spherical tip was centered(Fig. 51). A compressive
force at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min was applied to the
occlusal surface of the sample until the fracture occurred.
The force required to fracture each sample was recorded in
Newton (N). The data so obtained was tabulated and statistically
analysis was done.
Page 103