45
2019-2020 Master Thesis Handbook Created and Edited by: Dr. Tina Claiborne and Bridgette Winslow Revised and updated by Dr. Carissa Massey With References from Ithaca College Exercise Science Program & Wittenberg University Master of Education Thesis Preparation Guide

Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

2019-2020

Master Thesis Handbook

Created and Edited by:

Dr. Tina Claiborne and Bridgette Winslow

Revised and updated by Dr. Carissa Massey

With References from Ithaca College Exercise

Science Program & Wittenberg University

Master of Education Thesis Preparation Guide

Page 2: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

Table of Contents

General Information and Procedures on thesis proposal writing and defense

Introduction 1

Thesis Roles and Responsibilities 1

General Thesis Procedures 2

Sample Thesis Project Timeline 3

Thesis Proposal 3

Content, Organization and Style

Thesis Components 4

Thesis Styles and Fonts 8

Thesis Defense 9

Thesis Submission Process 10

Appendix A- IRB Approval Form 11

Appendix B-Thesis Approval Page 12

Appendix C- Thesis Title Page 13

Appendix D- Example of key thesis components –Athletic Training 14

Appendix E- Example of key thesis components – Criminal Justice 35

Appendix F- Instructions for PDF/A file format 42

Appendix G- Copyright Page 43

Page 3: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

1

GENERAL INFORMATION AND PROCEDURES ON THESIS PROCESS (PROPOSAL,

WRITING AND DEFENSE)

A. Introduction

The purpose of this document is to provide students with a guideline regarding thesis

preparation timelines, committee selection, proposal, formatting and defense.

B. Thesis Roles and Responsibilities

Candidate Responsibilities

Select a thesis committee chair, establish a thesis committee, and present the names

of the committee members to the Chair of the Department for approval.

Design and submit a proposal for committee approval.

Meet with committee to discuss proposal. Submit a signed thesis proposal form to the

Department Chair.

Work with Committee to establish the type of guidance that would best facilitate the

completion of the thesis; schedule regular meetings to review the progress of the

thesis.

Prepare and submit all required forms for the Internal Review Board.

Communicate any problems or difficulties that may arise during the thesis process

(research or writing).

Progress through the thesis process in accordance with the schedule established with

Committee Chair.

Submit the thesis within the required timeline. This includes making revisions in a

timely manner.

Upon approval, submit three completed copies of the thesis to Thesis Chair, Dean of

Academic Affairs, and Library (printing and binding fees will apply).

Committee Chair

Give guidance about the nature of the research and the standards expected. This

includes assisting the candidate in establishing a reasonable timeline for completion.

Maintain contact through regular meetings, as agreed to in discussions with the

candidate.

Be accessible to the candidate at other appropriate times when he or she may need

advice.

Request written drafts at regular intervals and returning drafts with constructive

comments within a reasonable amount of time.

Page 4: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

2

Communicate clearly to the candidate when progress is not being met or the level of

work does not meet the standards expected of a master’s level candidate.

Provide an independent written assessment of the thesis as part of the examination

process.

Sign the thesis and any other related documents to verify successful completion.

Schedule the thesis oral defense with the other committee members.

Attend the oral defense of the thesis and provide a written assessment of the thesis

defense as part of the examination process.

Committee Member Responsibilities

Provide feedback on stages of the conception, research and writing of the thesis.

Read and review candidate work on thesis as needed or requested by the candidate or

Committee Chair.

Meet with the candidate and committee as needed.

Attend the oral defense of the thesis and provide a written assessment of the thesis

defense as part of the final examination process.

Read the final copy of the thesis and sign when approved.

C. General Thesis Procedures

1. Select a thesis committee chair and in collaboration with the committee chair, select

at least two other committee members.

2. In collaboration with the committee chair and/or committee members establish a

schedule for the research and writing of the thesis.

3. Write and submit a Thesis Proposal to the committee.

4. Submit the Thesis Proposal Approval form to the Dean of Academic Affairs.

5. Submit an IRB petition for Thesis Research.

6. Schedule regular meetings with the committee chair and committee by midterm of the

intended graduation semester.

7. Upon approval of committee chair, schedule an oral defense no later than the 12th

week of the intended graduation semester.

8. Prior to the defense, prepare one copy of the Thesis Approval form for each bound

copy of the thesis being prepared.

9. Make changes to manuscript as suggested by committee.

10. Submit final copies to committee chair for approval and signature on Certificate of

Approval form.

11. Submit final copies to thesis chair, Dean of Academic Affairs and Library.

Page 5: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

3

Sample Thesis Project Timeline

Review literature, talk to professors, develop research questions: Summer

Choose thesis advisor, and two readers (Thesis Committee): Summer

Begin writing Introduction, Review of Literature, and Methods (you may choose to

research topic during the required research methods course. Often students may begin

developing these chapters early if they plan ahead): Summer/ Fall

Present proposal to Graduate faculty and Committee: Early Fall

Prepare and submit IRB proposal: Early Fall

Refine Introduction, Review of Literature and Methods as needed: Fall/Winter

Collect data: Late Fall/ Winter/ Early Spring

Analyze and Interpret data: Spring

Prepare results, Discussion: Spring

Refine thesis as needed for committee approval: Spring

Present and defend thesis: Spring

Prepare thesis for binding and printing: Spring

Please note, this is a sample timeline and may vary by department. Candidates are

responsible for working with the committee in establishing a timeline that works best for

them. The timeline is also subject to change depending on the semester in which the student

plans to graduate.

D. Thesis Proposal

Once a committee and topic have been chosen, a thorough literature review needs to be

performed and written (discussed later). The review of literature will help determine the

appropriate research questions, hypotheses and methods. IRB approval must be gained

PRIOR to the formal proposal. A 15-20 minute proposal will be presented to the thesis

committee and any other faculty/students who wish to attend. This proposal (written in the

future tense) will outline the pertinent background information, significance of the research

and methods to be used in order to answer the research questions. The purpose of this

presentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or methodology of

the proposed project. This proposal presentation should include an overview of the first three

chapters of your thesis (i.e., introduction, review of literature, methods and procedures). This

presentation should include the following:

A complete title.

An introduction of the proposed topic and project.

A clear and concise purpose statement,

Page 6: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

4

A significant statement outlining why the proposed project is significant to the existing

body of knowledge and the furthering of knowledge in the field.

Specific research questions or hypotheses statements.

Definitions of important terms, names, etc.

A review of the important and supporting literature,

A detailed description of the research design to be followed and the methods to be

conducted: selection of participants, measured materials, instrumentation, procedures,

role of pilot study, data analyses, etc. You should provide a 1-2 page outline of your

proposed project for those who are interested in this presentation. Information from this

presentation may prove beneficial in strengthening your thesis project. Note that it is your

responsibility (along with your thesis advisor) to announce in writing and post, to all

potential attendees, the time, date, and place of the proposal presentation at least one

week in advance of the event (taken in part from Ithaca College Thesis Handbook).

Content, Organization and Style

E. Thesis Components

It is difficult to describe the exact contents of each and every thesis, especially given the

wide variety of topics and methodologies that might be selected by the prospective thesis

candidate. The following descriptions are offered as a guide. Each component of the thesis is

listed in the order it should occur. Format details are specified for each page and samples can

be found in the appendices.

Proper formatting is required to ensure consistency for publishing and printing

purposes.

Thesis title page (sample found in Appendix B)

Thesis copyright page (sample found in Appendix F)

Thesis Approval page (sample found in Appendix C)

Abstract (sample found in Appendix D): Less than 250 words

Acknowledgments and Dedication (as needed)

Table of Contents (sample found in Appendix E for Traditional and Appendix F for

Proposal/Manuscript)

List of Tables (required if tables appear in text; sample found in Appendix G)

List of Figures (required if figures appear in text; sample found in Appendix H)

Page 7: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

5

Text (body of the thesis): Introduction (Appendix I), Literature Review (Appendix J),

Methods (Appendix K), Results (Appendix L), Discussion, Conclusion (Appendix

M))

References (Appendix N)

Appendices

Introduction

The purpose of the Introduction is to present the topic and justify the purpose of the research.

The scope of the problem will be briefly discussed leading to the purpose of the research.

Within the Introduction, the author will present the Research Problem, Statement of Purpose

and Hypothesis.

Review of Literature

“The Review of Literature follows the Introduction in the thesis but, in fact, the literature

review is the first step in planning a successful research project. The Review

should contain a thorough presentation of previously recognized literature/knowledge on

all topics important to developing the research hypotheses/questions and discussing the

results of the thesis. The Review should not extend into marginally relevant areas and should

generally be 15 - 30 pages. A good Review is carefully organized using a conceptual

framework. The Review of Literature begins with a brief preamble that tells the reader what

to expect from the Review and outlines the subtopics to be addressed. A partial example of a

Review of

Literature can be found in Appendix J (taken from Ithaca College Thesis Handbook).”

Methods

A careful, precise, and complete description of the details involved with all thesis

data collection. The broad aim of the Methods is to allow another investigator to pick up

the document and repeat the research project exactly as it was originally conducted. The

typical sections of the Method are subjects, instrumentation, design, data analyses, and

summary. It is important to include references as to why particular instruments and protocols

were chosen and report validity and reliability of the instrumentation where appropriate. A

partial example of Methods can be found in Appendix M (taken in part from Ithaca College

Thesis Handbook).

Page 8: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

6

Results

The Results provides a concise representation of what was found by the research.

Here the data are presented and statistical analyses are reported. The chapter is typically

organized by variable or by hypothesis tested. The text is primarily a series of brief factual

statements that highlight relevant information that can be found detailed in tabular or graphic

form. While the text may explain tables or figures, it is important that information not be

repetitive between text and graphics.

Tables in the Results (and throughout the text and Appendices) should be consistent in

presentation. Tables should stand alone, appear on pages independent of text and must be

referred to in the text prior to their appearance. Tables should appear on the page

immediately following their introducing in the text. Tables are generally double spaced as are

the notes that follow. It is common for a Notes paragraph to immediately follow the table.

Notes explain any abbreviations or symbols used in the table and provide any other

information the reader requires for the table to stand alone (i.e. be understood without

needing to refer to the text or any other page). Also use the examples found in Appendix O

for guidance on Table construction and Note preparation.

Figures, like tables, should stand alone, appear on pages independent of text and must be

referred to in the text prior to their appearance on the subsequent page. Most information

above regarding tables applies to figures. Figures, however, have no title above but instead a

caption below. Symbols are explained in a legend that is imbedded within the body of the

figure. Much of the information in the APA Manual (p.176 - 201) related to figures applies to

journal publication and not to thesis preparation; however, some of the information may be

instructive. The examples found in Appendix P should provide ample guidance on figure

construction and caption preparation. Before adding, always ask, “Does a table or figure add

clarity to the document?”. Moreover if tables or figures become too numerous it should be

asked if some would be better positioned as appendices. Tables, particularly statistical tables,

are typically put into appendices when using a Proposal/Manuscript format (taken in part

from Ithaca College Thesis Handbook).

Discussion

The Discussion addresses the results of the thesis in light of hypotheses and

previously published literature. Without repeating the Review of Literature, the Discussion

addresses questions related to previous work and compares similarities/dissimilarities of

Page 9: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

7

present results with previous research results. Applications of the findings for use by

practitioners (e.g., coaches, clinicians) should also be addressed here. The Discussion should

also describe any shortcoming (limitations) of the study, explain the significance and reasons

for these events, and potentially relate these issues to future research. The organization of

topics within the Discussion should be carefully and logically considered but cannot be

prescribed in any generic outline. Remember that Discussion is for explaining results but not

for presenting data a second time-that's why the Results were written. Do not use statistical

terminology or jargon too freely in the Discussion. Talk about concepts-not numbers and

statistical significance. This is the place to explain the importance of the findings, describe:

their meaning and application. Always end the Discussion with a final paragraph that drives

home the main findings of the study format.

Limitations: description of the degree of generalizability of data that often is caused by a

decision made by the investigator. Limitations can also result when an assumption is known

to fail or an extraneous/influential variable goes unmeasured or uncontrolled. An example of

a limitation is when it is decided to collect data on a sample of elementary school girls,

generalization of the results is probably limited to girls of a similar age. These data cannot

likely be generalized to boys of high school age. Another example of a limitation is if one

makes the assumption that questionnaires are answered honestly or diets are followed

faithfully but finds unidentified subject(s) may have cheated (taken in part from Ithaca

College Thesis Handbook).

Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations

This section is often an extension of the abstract that provides highlights from the previous

five chapters with emphasis on the methods, results, and discussion. Recommendations for

future study are also enumerated and identify important extensions of the thesis that would

enhance the existing knowledge base. An example of Summary, Conclusions, and

Recommendations can be found in Appendix Q (taken in part from Ithaca College Thesis

Handbook).

References

For Traditional style, the APA Manual is the rule. For Proposal/Manuscript style,

use the format the intended journal requires (AMA, APA, etc). It is critical that references

appearing in the text agree EXACTLY with those in the reference list. Always carefully

Page 10: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

8

double check that all citations appear in both the text and reference list and that all authors

are properly listed (taken in part from Ithaca College Thesis Handbook).

Appendices

Appendices should contain any information that is vital to fully understanding a

point in the thesis or replicating a method of the study, but the information is not vital to the

flow of the text. That is, a reader may not be interested in checking the information in an

appendix but would still appreciate the importance of the point that referred the reader to the

appendix. Proposal/Manuscript style theses typically place detailed statistical tables and

figures in appendices. All appendices must be addressed in the text of the thesis. Examples of

appendices appear in Appendix S (taken in part from Ithaca College Thesis Handbook).

F. Thesis Style and Fonts

The document should be typed using Times New Roman or Arial 12pt. This style and font

applies to all aspects of the document photo records or other facsimiles that may be part of

the date collection.

Pagination of the thesis begins with page 1 on the first page of the Introduction and continues

sequentially with Arabic numerals through the last page of the Appendices. Page numbers

appear right justified one inch from the top of the page with no pages left unnumbered.

Exceptions are the first page of each chapter/section, first page of each Appendix, and the

preliminary pages prior to the body of the thesis (using Roman numerals), which are all

Other formatting specs (margins, paper type, etc.) will be determined by the library for

printing purposes).center numbered at the bottom of the page.

G. Margins

All pages of the final copies of the manuscript must be within the following limits:

left margins 1.5 inches

right margins 1 Inch

top and bottom margins 1 inch

main (title, chapter,etc.) pages, top 2 inches

Thesis Defense

Page 11: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

9

Upon completion of the thesis, prepare a presentation for thesis defense. The theses defense

should only occur when the thesis advisor and committee members agree that the thesis is in the

final stage of approval and the candidate is fully prepared for defense. The thesis defense

generally involves lengthy discussion of the theses and will also include discussion of topics

generically related to the candidate’s degree. This presentation should include the following:

How did you get interested in this topic?

Why is this topic important?

What was the problem you investigated?

What is the key research supporting this area of investigation?

What procedures did you follow in this investigation (i.e., methods)?

What were your major results?

Did your results lead to the rejection or acceptance of your hypothesis?

How did your results directly answer your research question(s)?

How do your endings compare to the results of other studies?

What contribution does your study make to the profession?

How can your results be applied in the ’real world’?

It is your responsibility (along with your thesis advisor) to announce in writing and post, to all

potential attendees, the time, date, and place of the thesis defense presentation at least one week

in advance of the event. Included with this announcement should be a 1-2 page outline of your

research project and presentation. After a successful defense the candidate will submit any

needed revisions to the thesis advisor and committee members for final approval and signatures

(taken in part from Ithaca College Thesis Handbook).

Thesis Submission Process

Candidates must submit an electronic copy of their approved thesis to the Dean of Graduate

Studies. Electronic copies must include the signatures of all members of the thesis committee on

the thesis approval page. These signatures indicate that the thesis committee has accepted the

thesis. Theses will be published electronically through Shipman Library in the library archives.

After successful completion of the thesis defense, candidates need to do the following:

Page 12: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

10

1. Obtain signatures of the thesis committee on the signature page that will accompany each

official copy at the conclusion of a successful oral defense.

2. Submit an electronic copy of the Master’s Thesis with signatures to the Dean of Graduate

Studies at [email protected]

a. Theses must be submitted as a single pdf document file.

b. All files must be in “PDF/A” file format, a file format designed for long-term,

archival used and whose standards have been established by the Library of

Congress (https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000318.shtml

c. Refer to Appendix F for instructions for saving a document as a PDF/A file

3. The Dean of Graduate Studies will forward the electronic file to the Library.

Page 13: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

11

Appendix A

Page 14: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

12

Appendix B

Thesis Proposal Approval Page

Adrian College

Graduate Program

Adrian, Michigan

CERTIFICATE OF PROPOSAL APPROVAL

MASTER OF {Art/SCIENCE} THESIS

This is to certify that the Master of {Art/Science} Thesis Proposal entitled:

{Title Here}

Submitted and presented by

{Name Here}

in the Graduate Program in {Insert Graduate Program}

at Adrian College has been approved:

Thesis Advisor:

Committee Member:

Committee Member:

Dean of Graduate Studies: ___________________________________________

Candidate:

Date:

Page 15: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

13

Appendix C

Thesis Title Page

{TITLE HERE}

A Master Thesis presented to the Faculty of the

Graduate Program in {Program Here}

Adrian College

__________________________

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree

Master of {Arts/ Science}

__________________________

by

{Name Here}

{Date Here}

{Adrian College Logo: current logos available at adrian.edu/about-us/public-relations}

Page 16: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

14

Appendix D

Example of key thesis components from Athletic Training

ABSTRACT

This study examined the effect of two days of partial sleep deprivation (PSD) on indicators of

performance in female basketball players. Subjects (N = 12) volunteered for the study and were

experienced female basketball players with four years of high school and/or collegiate varsity

basketball playing experience. Subjects completed a Sleep Quality scale and the Morningness-

Eveningness and Eynseck Personality questionnaires. During PSD, subjects slept 2.5 h on each

of the two successive days (PSD- 1, PSD- 2). They were tested at 0900, 1400, and 1900 h during

BL and PSD conditions. At each testing session body temperature, hand steadiness, short-term

memory, reaction time, basketball skill (i.e., vertical jump, free throw shooting, passing, control

dribbling, defensive movement, and speed shooting) and maximal leg strength were measured.

During the PSD testing weekend, subjects slept only five hours in a 60-h period. Data were

analyzed using a separate 3 x 3 factorial ANOVA with repeated measures for each dependent

variable to determine significant differences between days and times. A post-hoc comparison test

was used for pair-wise comparison when ANOVA yielded a significant effect. The results show

PSD has no general impact on basketball performance indicators of body temperature, short-term

memory, and maximal leg strength in college-aged female basketball players. Reaction time

slowed after two nights PSD with a significant decrement evident only following the second

night of PSD. One paradoxical finding was hand steadiness improved with PSD. There was no

significant diurnal rhythm in hand steadiness short-term memory, reaction time or eccentric

muscle strength. Body temperature did exhibit a time of day oscillation with peak temperature at

1400 h. Practical application of the study’s results should be made judiciously when attempting

to relate the impact of PSD to actual short performance.

Page 17: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

15

Example of Traditional Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................... iv

DEDICATION .........................................................................................................v

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. xi

LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. xii

Chapter

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1

Statement of Purpose .......................................................................2

Hypotheses .......................................................................................2

2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ..................................................................7

Introduction ......................................................................................7

Nature of Sleep ................................................................................7

Effects of Sleep Deprivation ..........................................................10

Thermoregulation ...........................................................................11

Hormonal Response and Energy Metabolism................................12

Cardiovascular Exercise.................................................................17

Muscular Strength ..........................................................................19

Athletic Performance .....................................................................20

Circadian Rythyms.........................................................................21

Temperature ...................................................................................22

Cognitive Performance ..................................................................24

Cardiovascular Exercise.................................................................25

Athletic Performance .....................................................................26

Summary ........................................................................................29

Page 18: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

16

3. METHODS ............................................................................................30

Subjects ..........................................................................................30

Design ............................................................................................31

Measurement and Procedures ........................................................31

Data Analyses ................................................................................34

Summary ........................................................................................35

4. RESULTS ..............................................................................................36

Hand Steadiness ............................................................................ 36

Reaction Time ................................................................................37

Eccentric Muscle Performance ......................................................37

Short-Term Memory ......................................................................38

Circadian Classification ................................................................ 38

Body Temperature .........................................................................38

Summary ........................................................................................38

5. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................39

6. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .........42

7. REFERENCES ......................................................................................61

APPENDICES

A. SLEEP QUALITY SCALE ..................................................................81

B. MEDICAL HISTORY / HEALTH HABIT QUESTIONNAIRE .........82

C. INROMED CONSENT FORM ............................................................85

D. SLEEP LOG ..........................................................................................88

E. MORNINGNESS-EVENINGNESS QUESTIONNAIRE ....................89

F. EYNSECK PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE ...............................93

G. 24-HOUR HISTORY FORM ...............................................................96

H. FIVE HOUR HISTORY FORM ...........................................................97

Page 19: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

17

I. FREE-RECALL WORD LIST ...............................................................98

J. PROTOCOL OUTLINE.........................................................................99

K. DEBRIEFING STATEMENT ............................................................100

L. RAW DATA ........................................................................................101

M. SUBJECT PROFILE ..........................................................................109

N. ANOVA TABLES

N-1 Two Trials Hand Steadiness: ANOVA (3 x 3; Days x Times)110

N-2 Reaction Time: ANOVA (3 x 3; Days x Times) ..................111

N-3 Eccentric Knee Flexion at 150°/sec: ANOVA .....................112

N-4 Eccentric Knee Extension at 150°/sec: ANOVA..................113

Page 20: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

18

Example of Proposal Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................... iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................... iv

DEDICATION .........................................................................................................v

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. xi

LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. xii

Chapter

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1

Statement of Purpose .......................................................................2

Hypotheses ...................................................................................... 2

2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ..................................................................7

Introduction ..................................................................................... 7

Nature of Sleep ................................................................................7

Effects of Sleep Deprivation ..........................................................10

Thermoregulation ...........................................................................11

Hormonal Response and Energy Metabolism................................12

Cardiovascular Exercise.................................................................17

Muscular Strength ......................................................................... 19

Athletic Performance .....................................................................20

Circadian Rhythms.........................................................................21

Temperature .................................................................................. 22

Cognitive Performance ..................................................................24

Cardiovascular Exercise.................................................................25

Athletic Performance .....................................................................26

Summary ........................................................................................29

Page 21: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

19

3. METHODS ............................................................................................30

Subjects ..........................................................................................30

Design ............................................................................................31

Measurement and Procedures ........................................................31

Data Analyses ................................................................................34

Summary ........................................................................................35

4. PROPOSAL REFERENCES .................................................................38

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT

INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................52

METHODS ................................................................................................53

Subjects ......................................................................................... 53

Procedures ..................................................................................... 53

RESULTS ..................................................................................................56

Hand Steadiness .............................................................................56

Reaction Time ................................................................................57

Eccentric Muscle Performance ......................................................57

Short-Term Memory ......................................................................58

Circadian Classification .................................................................58

Body Temperature .........................................................................58

DISCUSSION ........................................................................................... 59

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS..............66

MANSUCRIPT REFERENCES ................................................................75

APPENDICES

A. SLEEP QUALITY SCALE ......................................................81

B. MEDICAL HISTORY / HEALTH HABIT QUESTIONNAIRE82

C. INFORMED CONSENT FORM ..............................................85

Page 22: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

20

D. SLEEP LOG ..............................................................................88

E. MORNINGNESS-EVENINGNESS QUESTIONNAIRE ....... 89

F. EYNSECK PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRE ...................93

G. 24-HOUR HISTORY FORM ...................................................96

H. FIVE HOUR HISTORY FORM ...............................................97

I. FREE-RECALL WORD LIST .................................................. 98

J. PROTOCOL OUTLINE.............................................................99

K. DEBRIEFING STATEMENT ................................................100

L. RAW DATA ............................................................................101

M. SUBJECT PROFILE ............................................................. 109

N. ANOVA TABLES

N-1 Two Trials Hand Steadiness: ANOVA (3 x 3; Days x Times) 110

N-2 Reaction Time: ANOVA (3 x 3; Days x Times) .........111

N-3 Eccentric Knee Flexion at 150°/sec: ANOVA ............112

N-4 Eccentric Knee Extension at 150°/sec: ANOVA.........113

Page 23: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

21

Example of List of Tables

LIST OF TABLES

1. Hand Steadiness (mean ± SD) for Two Trials during Varied Sleep Conditions58

2. Reaction Time (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions ..........................59

3. Quadriceps to Hamstring Ratio (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions 72

4. Short Term Memory (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions .................73

5. Body Temperature (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions ....................74

Page 24: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

22

Example of List of Figures

LIST OF FIGURES

1. Hand Steadiness (mean ± SD) for Two Trials during Varied Sleep Conditions58

2. Reaction Time (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions ..........................59

3. Quadriceps to Hamstring Ratio (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions 72

4. Short Term Memory (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions .................73

5. Body Temperature (mean ± SD) during Varied Sleep Conditions ....................74

Page 25: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

23

Example of Introduction

INTRODUCTION

Partial sleep deprivation (PSD) represents a frequent occurrence in society, especially for

airline personnel, shift workers, health care professionals, and college students. Many college

athletes especially, are faced with juggling the pressures of academic responsibilities, work, and

athletics into a single 24-hour time period. To accomplish this, PSD is sometimes chosen as a

means of balancing responsibilities. PSD is considered a reduction in average sleep time, usually

a loss greater than 40-50 % of the typical amount of sleep, and less than the recommended eight

hours (Horn & Dollinger, 1989). While most research has focused on exercise performance

under sleep loss conditions, unfortunately few studies exist defining the effect of PSD on

indicators of sport performance.

Sleep loss conditions may also influence individual circadian rhythms. Circadian rhythms

are daily biological events governing most physiological functions such as temperature,

hormonal levels, heart rate, and sleep-wake patterns, with a repeating length of 24 hours (Hill,

Cureton, Collins, & Grisham 1988). Circadian rhythms, also known as ’’diurnal variations”, can

exhibit wide individual differences among people. Certain physiological functions can show

maximum and minimum fluctuations throughout specific times of the day for individuals

(Winget, Delkoshia, & Holley, 1985). These various “feeling best'' times may impact

psychological and physiological factors that can affect performance (Hill et a1., 1988).

Considering circadian rhythms are cyclic, athletic participation occurring before or after a peak

performance time may impact optimal effectiveness (Atkinson & Reilly, 1996; Kircaldy, 1984;

& Winget et a1., 1985).

Page 26: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

24

When athletes undergo PSD, circadian rhythms may be altered. Alterations in the sleep-

wake cycle from early/late start of an event, anxiety causing midnight insomnia, or trans

meridian travel can provoke changes in circadian rhythms. Johnson and Naitoh (1974) found an

important source of variance in performance during sleep deprivation (SD) studies was a

circadian alteration caused by the timing of the sleep-wake cycle. Given the potential impact of

SD on athletic performance and circadian rhythms and the lack of study of these factors on sports

performance, it is necessary to gather information on these topics for application by college-aged

athletes and coaches. College-aged athletes are naturally prime candidates for PSD but rely on

acute synchronization of psychological and physiological factors for optimal sport participation.

Statement of Purpose

The purpose of this study will be to examine the effect of PSD, with sleep curtailed to

only 2.5 hours for two consecutive nights, on indicators of sport performance in female

basketball players.

Hypothesis

The null hypotheses for this study are:

1. Sleep limited to 2.5 hours for two consecutive nights will have no effect on body temperature,

hand steadiness, reaction time, short-term memory, and eccentric muscle performance (i.e., knee

flexion, extension, and quadriceps to hamstring ratio at 150 degrees/second) in college-aged

female basketball players compared to a baseline condition that allows for a typical night of

sleep.

2. There will be no differences in the measure of body temperature, hand steadiness, reaction

time, short-term memory, and eccentric muscle performance (i.e. knee flexion, extension, and

quadriceps to hamstring ratio at 150 degrees/second), in college-aged female basketball players,

Page 27: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

25

in relation to time (0900, 1400, and 1900 hours) of testing in college-aged female basketball

players.

Scope of the Problem

The average person typically sleeps for a single stretch of 7.5 hours out of each 24-hour

day (Colquhoun, 1971). Though PSD can negatively impact various types of performance,

college-aged athletes often choose PSD as a time balancing means. This study will look at the

impact of less than three hours sleep on two consecutive nights on performance in female college

basketball players. These athletes rely on physical, cognitive, and emotional parameters for

optimal athletic skill performance. Practice and games may be scheduled for various times of day

potentially after differing sleep conditions. The change in the sleep-wake cycle may impact

negatively on measures of body temperature, hand steadiness, short-term memory, reaction time,

and/or muscular strength. While most previous research has focused on exercise performance,

few studies have examined the impact of PSD loss on sport-related skill for college-aged female

athletes. The results should be of interest to coaches and athletes alike.

Page 28: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

26

Example of Partial Review of Literature

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Introduction

Sleep and sport performance are highly specific functions, impacted by many factors. The

majority of the factors affecting sport performance vary with time of day, individual circadian

differences, and potentially the quality and quantity of sleep. This review outlines the nature of

sleep, and how sleep deprivation impacts various types of physiological functions, exercise

capacity and sport performance. Another major section is dedicated to examining the impact of

circadian rhythms on physiological function and athletic performance.

Nature of Sleep

Sleep is generally regarded as important for maintaining physical and psychological well-

being (Savis, 1994). It has been commonly assumed that the primary function of sleep is to

replenish certain physiological processes which deteriorate during periods of wakefulness (Taub

& Berger, 1973) such as tissue restitution or avoidance of exhaustion (Reilly, 1990). Sleep has

also been proposed as a restorative process for central nervous system function (Chen, 1991).

Sleep has been shown to be important for learning, short term memory, and memory

consolidation (Demingy Zhenyun, Daosheng, & Shanxun, 1991).

Sleep can be divided into five individual stages. Stages one through four are collectively

known as non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep states followed by stage five known as rapid

eye movement (REM) (VanHelder & Radomski, 1989). The transition from stage one through to

stage four represents progressively deeper levels of sleep (Tilley & Wilkinson, 1984) NREM and

REM sleep repeat in cycles of approximately 90-minutes……

Example of Partial Methods

Page 29: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

27

METHODS

This chapter describes in detail the methodology of the study. The methods section is

subdivided as follows (a) subjects, (b) design, (c) measurement and procedures, and (d) data

analyses.

Subjects

After approval of protocol by Ithaca College’s Human Subjects Research Committee, the

study will commence. Twelve college-aged female students (N = 12) from the population of

Marietta College located in Marietta, Ohio will participate in the study. The subjects will range

in age between 18 and 22 years and will be recruited solely on a voluntary basis. The main

criterion for subject participation will be four years of high school and/or collegiate varsity

basketball playing experience. During a preliminary subject recruitment meeting, interested

athletes will be asked to complete a Sleep Quality scale (Appendix A) and Medical History Habit

questionnaire (Appendix B). These questionnaires will be used to determine regular nocturnal

sleeping patterns and non-reliance on tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs, including coordinated

products (e g , coffee, tea, cola), which will be deemed unacceptable for subject participation.

The subjects will all be in good health and will have clearance to participate in intercollegiate

athletics.

Once selected for participation, subjects will be made aware of the study protocol, risks,

and benefits. The main potential risk associated with this type of study is possible sleepiness

throughout and after the two day PSD testing period. Sleepiness may cause feelings of fatigue

(Reilly & Pierce, 1994), changes in mood (Herscovitch & Broughton, 1981. & Dinges et al,

1997), decreased working efficiency (Wilkinson, Edwards, & Haines, 1966), and slowed reaction

time (Reilly & Deykin, 1983). Additional risks could occur during sports skill testing including

Page 30: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

28

but not limited to sprains, strains, abrasions, and contusions. All subjects will be given the

opportunity to ask questions about their role in the study and will be required to read and sign an

Informed Consent form (Appendix C). A sleep log (Appendix D) will be distributed, for

completion, to be brought to the first testing session. The sleep log will assess self-reported

estimates of sleep quality and quantity.

Design

The PSD treatment will consist of 2.5 hours sleep on each of the two successive days

(PSD-I, PSD- 2) of the experimental condition. To minimize the impact of an order effect on

learning, subjects will be randomly placed into two testing groups. All the subjects will be tested

at 0900, 1400, and 1900 hours during baseline and PSD conditions. Half of the subjects (n = 6)

will be baseline (BL) tested one week prior to the PSD weekend, while the remaining half (n = 6)

will be BL tested one week following the PSD study, after recovery sleep occurs. BL testing will

occur at 0900, 1400, and 1900 hours on a day after ’’quality’’ sleep (6 - 10 hours) results. BL

testing will consist of the same tests, test order, and test times as the PSD weekend with subjects

only reporting for the three testing sessions. Prior to either BL testing or PSD conditions,

subjects will be allowed three practice trials of each test to acquaint them with specific testing

procedures to be used and to minimize the impact of learning on performance.

Measurement and Procedures

Sleep Quality Scale

Sleep quality will be assessed using a psychological self-rating Sleep Quality

questionnaire that incorporates both a psychometry and analogue rating scale (Visser et al,

1978). The investigators, to subjectively determine if the subject had regular sleeping patterns,

will use the Sleep Quality scale (Appendix A) as a screening tool for participation. Subjects will

Page 31: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

29

be required to show regular sleeping patterns, with an average nightly sleep ration between 6 - 10

hours per night, to be considered for participation in the study.

Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire

Characteristics associated with sleep vary greatly from person to person (Sexton-Radek

& Harris, 1992). A particularly important individual difference is the subject’s preference

towards morningness or eveningness (Aden & Almirall, 1991). The concept of a morningness-

eveningness dimension describes the notion that some people (morning types) prefer day activity

while others (evening types) prefer night activity (Neubauer, 1992). Horne and Ostberg’s (1976)

Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (Appendix E) will be used to determine the subject’s

circadian classification of ’’morning type” , ''evening type” , or ''neither type''. This questionnaire

will be administered during the subject's first testing session for descriptive purposes. The 19-

item questionnaire was selected because of its acceptable reliability level of r = .89 (Posey &

Ford, 1981). This instrument assesses self-descriptions of well-being, alertness, and fatigue at

different times of the day, as well as self- reported preferred times for physical activity, mental

activity, and sleep (O'Connor & Davis, 1992). Horne and Ostberg (1976) designed an arbitrary

scoring scale as can be seen in the bold print of Appendix E. The appropriate score for questions

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 19, is displayed beside the corresponding response.

Question 17 corresponds with the most extreme cross on the right hand side, which is used as the

reference point. The appropriate score value below the scale is will then…

Page 32: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

30

Example of Partial Results

RESULTS

The raw data for the computerized CPT test scores are found in Appendix E. It is noted

that n = 7 for the thiamin post-test, NA condition for both groups, the thiamin post- test CV

condition for the ADHD group, and n = 6 for the 10-min post-test CV condition for the control

group, as the participants did not show up to the test site within the scheduled time frame. An

alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical tests. A summary of the final analysis is as follows:

Omission Errors

Repeated measures ANOVA (2 x 3 x 3) revealed no significant interactions for the study

on omission errors. There was, however, a significant main effect for ADHD versus control

students in omission errors scored on the CPT (Table 3). Control students responded to more

targets than ADHD students on all of the test days. Interestingly, for the ADHD group, the mean

values, over time, for the CV exercise sessions trended downward indicating improved attention

(Table 4, Figure 1), but these values did not reach significance.

Reaction Time

Repeated measures ANOVA (2 x 3 x 3) revealed no significant interaction for the study

on reaction time scores. Although the admit group scores were generally slower from the non-

ADHD group, differences between group, activity, and time were not statistically significant

(Table 5). Reaction time T-scores less than 40 are considered….

Page 33: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

31

Example of Partial Summary, conclusions, recommendations

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

This study examined the effects of association and disassociation on pain tolerance and

performance in athletes with exercise-induced muscle soreness/damage. Female (n = 20) and

male (p = 14) athletes volunteered to participate in this study. Muscle soreness/damage was

induced in the hamstring and quadricep muscle groups on the Biodex System 2 via eccentric

knee flexion and extension at a speed of 90 °/sec. Subsequent data analyses were conducted on a

sample size of 30 after 2 females and 2 males reported for Session 2 with no muscle soreness in

both muscle groups. Because muscle soreness was necessary in this study, these 4 subjects were

excused from further testing.

Interclass correlation coefficients (R) revealed the internal consistency of the two sets of

10 repetitions and two sets of 40 repetitions. The R values indicated that all scores of each

performance variable for the two sets of 10 repetitions but only the scores from the first set of 40

repetitions be used for subsequent data analyses. Mixed model ANOVAS and post hoc Tukey

analyses revealed that there were significant differences (p < .05) in PT, TW, and AP from

Session 1 to Session 2 to Session 3. Analyses of the MSS, SAT, Pre-PPS, and Post-PPS in

Session 2 and the MSS, SAT, and Pre-PPS in Session 3 revealed that there were no group

differences on these measures. These results led to acceptance of the research hypothesis that

actual muscle soreness, and not anxiety or preperception of performance, was closely related to

the decreased performance scores in Sessions 2 and 3 from Session 1.

Examination of Figures 4, 7-12 illustrates a trend for both the association and

disassociation scores of PT for both muscle groups to increase their scores of PT for both muscle

groups with 10 and 40 repetitions and for TW and AP of muscle groups only at 40 repetitions.

Page 34: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

32

This would indicate that cognition intervention was marginally successful in both muscle

increasing performance scores, but not in a statistical sense.

Analysis of the Post-PPS in Session 3 revealed that the association and disassociation

groups differed significantly from the control group. These treatment subjects perceived that the

strategies had significantly improved their performance when in reality their performance had

not significantly improved. This apparent illusion has both positive and negative effects in

relation to sports injury rehabilitation. Those athletes with low pain tolerance tend to adhere less

to their rehabilitation (Fisher, 1990) and could be greatly helped by these strategies. Should these

injured athletes be provided with an enhanced sense of self-efficacy in tolerating pain by these

strategies, then the positive feelings that these strategies seem to evoke can only be beneficial.

However, athletes with high levels of pain tolerance may increase the severity of their injury

while utilizing such strategies because they might ignore the cues their pain could be providing.

Therefore, it appears that association and disassociation is effective in increasing

perceptions of performance but only marginally effective at actually increasing performance.

Perhaps the acute long-lasting pain that is associated with exercise-induced muscle

soreness/damage explains, in part, this paradox. However, the illusory efficacy that these

strategies provided is worthy of future research into their application to sports injury

rehabilitation.

Conclusions

The results of this study yielded the following conclusions:

1. Athletes’ perception of performance is significantly improved by utilizing association

or disassociation strategies.

Page 35: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

33

2. Athletes with muscle soreness/damage are not able to overcome the effects of this

soreness and significantly enhance their strength performance while utilizing association or

disassociation strategies.

3. Athletes’ perception of effort and motivation appear to be enhanced by utilizing

association or disassociation strategies.

Recommendations

The following recommendations for further study were made after the completion of this

investigation:

1. Tests of the effectiveness of cognitive strategies should be undertaken using actual

injured athletes as subjects.

2. Tests of the effectiveness of cognitive strategies should be undertaken after injured

athletes have been trained in using these strategies.

3. Further investigation into the concept of illusory efficacy, as it relates to sport injury

rehabilitation, should be undertaken.

4. Further investigation into the effectiveness of cognitive strategies that address

emotional, cognitive, and behavioral components seems advisable.

Page 36: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

34

Example of Partial References

REFERENCES

Anshel, M. H. (1990). Sport psychology: From theory to practice. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch

Scarisbrick.

Armstrong, R. B. (1984). Mechanisms of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness:

A brief overview. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 16, 529-538.

Banana, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Psychological Review, 84, 191- 215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory.

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Barbee, J., & Landis, D. (1984). Reliability of Cybex computer measures (Program Abstract,

1984 American Physical Therapy Association Annual Conference). Physical Therapy,

64, 737.

Bayer, T L., Baer. P. E., & Early, C. (1991). Situational and psychophysiological factors in

psychologically induced pain. Pain, 44, 45-50.

Beecher, H. K. (1956). Relationship of significance of wound to pain experienced. Journal of

American Medical Association, 161, 609-1613.

Biodex Corporation. (1988). Multi-joint system manual.

Page 37: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

35

Appendix E

Key thesis notes from Criminal Justice

The Master’s Thesis is the culminating project of the Master of Arts in Criminal Justice program.

SCJ 599 Thesis defense represents the last stage (preceded by SCJ 504 Graduate Research

Methods and SCJ 592 Thesis Preparation) in a three-course sequence of thesis work. Under the

guidance of their Thesis Committee Chair, students will incorporate work done for these courses,

and other graduate courses, into their Master’s Thesis. Each thesis should focus on a relevant

scholarly issue within your criminal justice area of interest. A successful defense will require

substantial research, rigorous analysis, and clear and thoughtful prose culminating in a paper of

publishable quality no fewer than 50 pages in length.

The completion of a Master’s Thesis will entail achieving several goals, with the latter reflective

of the Adrian College Ribbons of Excellence program. These goals, to be reached through the 3-

course sequence of SCJ 504, SCJ 592 and SCJ 599 (Thesis Defense), are as follows:

Learn to recognize viable research questions and propose narrowly-tailored and

focused research methods for acquiring answers

Develop information synthesis and aggregation skills necessary for structuring a

coherent literature review

Master specific research methods and statistical techniques used in social science

research

Present a unified, well-organized and intelligent final product

The Master’s Thesis addresses the Ribbons of Excellence in the following manner:

Thinking critically: developing critical habits of mind; exploring multiple points of

view; raising thoughtful questions, identifying problems and solutions

Caring for humanity and the world: making socially responsible decisions

Learning throughout a lifetime:

Thesis Manuscript

Student theses are expected to conform to social science research standards and guidelines. The

outline below details the general format and content expectations for your thesis manuscript.

I. Introduction

a. Brief, general statement about your research topic

b. 1-2 sentences about how your study relates to this topic

c. Provides a “road map” for your paper.

d. Example:

i. “Divorce rates have fallen in recent years; down from the late 20th century

high point of roughly 50% to closer to 40% by 2012. There are several factors

that impact whether a couple divorces, including how frequently they argue

Page 38: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

36

and the age at which they married (Cherlin 2009), and their living situation

prior to and during marriage (Brown 2005; Smock and Manning 2010).

This research explores one such factor: unemployment as a result of the

economic recession of 2008. I begin by reviewing the literature on divorce

and elaborating each of the reasons above, and then discuss new hypotheses

drawn from contemporary theories of marriage and divorce. The Methods and

Results sections describe my variable operationalization and statistical tests. I

conclude with a discussion of the implication of my findings and their

congruency with existing literature.”

II. Literature Review

a. Summarizes 15-50 research papers on your research topic and related topics

i. From above example:

1. Research topic = economic influence on divorce rates

2. Relevant topics of literature: divorce rates/trends, reasons for

divorce/marriage, the impact of economic conditions on personal

relationships, history of divorce/marriage, etc.

b. Appropriate points to discuss from these articles include:

i. What the authors did (their design/methods) to study your topic, and how it

relates to your design/methods

ii. What the authors found from their study and how it informs your study and

the relevant field(s)

iii. Points of disagreement between authors or debates in the field and the body of

theory/evidence from each “side”

c. Justification of your study

i. May end this section with a brief statement about how your study fits with the

literature you just summarized, how/why the literature justifies you doing this

research

ii. May also be done at the end of the Introduction or beginning of the Methods

section

III. Methods

a. Describe how you obtained your data

i. From above example:

1. “I used data from the Fragile Families database. These data were

collected from 1980 until 1999 through interviews and surveys given

Page 39: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

37

to female-headed households with annual earnings of less than

$50,000.”

OR

2. “I designed a survey to assess the relationship between unemployment

and divorce. I solicited respondents using emailed surveys to home

email addresses provided in public records. Emails contained a letter

of consent and a link to the survey online…”

b. Describe your sample

i. Who are they, what do they “look” like

ii. Averages/percentages of all demographic variables (age, race, gender,

education, etc.)

iii. If you are using a select population (students, prisoners, sub-sets from a larger

dataset), you could describe if/how the general population differs from your

sample

c. Describe the variables you used and how they were measured

i. From above example:

1. “I used the three available income and employment variables in the

Fragile Families dataset. These include: a categorical variable for

employment (full-time, part-time, unemployed), hours worked per

week (ratio level), and annual salary (in thousands of dollars).”

OR

2. “My dependent variable is risk of divorce. I measure this variable

using a composite score generated from responses on several risk

factors, including: frequency of fights about money,… All attitudinal

and relational questions were measured using a 5 point Likert-type

scale. My key independent variables include the employment status of

each spouses, perception of job security, and income-to-debt ratio

(self-reported).”

IV. Results

a. Discuss your analysis plan

i. Describe the statistical tests you perform to “clean” and prepare the data

b. Discuss each hypothesis and the appropriate analysis/test separately

i. What did you test, and what did you find?

ii. From above example:

Page 40: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

38

1. “To determine whether unemployment raises the risk of divorce, I ran

a logistic regression using the 3 categories of employment (full-time,

part-time, unemployed) to predict odds of divorce (controlling for

demographic characteristics of the couple). The results suggest that

unemployment raises the risk of divorce by 10% (bexp= .104) beyond

baseline…”

V. Discussion and Conclusion

a. Briefly restate the main goal of your paper

b. Briefly summarize your main hypotheses and findings

c. Discuss what your findings mean, how they relate to the literature, what new info we

gain from your study.

i. From above example:

1. “These results imply a positive relationship between unemployment

and divorce rates, such that couples experiencing one or more spouses

without a job had a higher risk for divorce than dual-employment

couples. Divorce research has repeatedly shown that economic

instability is linked to divorce rates, and this study supports that

conclusion. Specifically, …”

d. Discuss the limitations/issues with your study

e. Discuss ways research in this area could be extended

VI. References

a. *We require ASA formatting for thesis manuscripts*

b. ASA (or APA) style is conventional for Soc/CJ journals

i. Free style guides exist online through Purdue’s Online Writing Lab (OWL)

c. From above example:

i. Brown, Susan. 2005. “How Cohabitation is Reshaping American Families.”

Contexts 4, 3: 33-37.

ii. Cherlin, Andrew J. 2009. The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage

and the Family in America Today. NY: Random House, Inc.

iii. Smock, Pamela J. and Wendy Manning. 2010. “New Couples, New Families:

The Cohabitation Revolution in the United States.” Pp. 131-139 in B. Risman

(ed.) Families as They Really Are. W.W. Norton and Company.

Page 41: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

39

VII. Other components

a. Abstract

i. Succinct summary of each of the main sections of your paper (intro,

theory/hypotheses, methods, results, conclusion)

ii. Usually written last, once you have info organized into the above sections

b. Tables, graphs (optional)

i. Visual summaries of your findings, measures/materials, etc.

ii. Can be included within the body of the text or as appendices

c. Appendices (optional)

i. Any additional supporting material (see above)

d. Introductory Materials:

i. Title page

ii. Table of Contents

iii. Dedication/Acknowledgements

Thesis Defense Hearing

You must defend your thesis before the committee you have assembled and receive a majority

vote (at least 2-1) for approval of your thesis. Your defense will take place during at a date to be

determined during Week 14 of the semester. The particular date, time, and location of your

defense will be determined according to the availability of committee members.

A majority vote for approval will signify a successful defense and completion of your thesis.

Failure to receive a majority vote for approval of your thesis will result in a “failed” hearing,

regardless of your performance in SCJ 599 (Thesis Defense), and the student will not graduate

with his/her Master’s degree.

In the event that your thesis is provisionally approved by the committee, you will be notified of

the committee’s recommended revisions, if any, by your thesis committee chair in writing no

later than Friday, Dec. 6th at 5pm. You will have until Friday, Dec. 13th at 5pm to revise your

thesis according to the committee’s recommendations, whereupon the committee will re-vote in

light of your revisions.

Your defense will be open to the public and last approximately—but no longer than—one hour.

It will begin with a brief (10-15 minutes) uninterrupted presentation of your thesis research,

followed by up to 45 minutes of verbal examination by the members of your committee. The

examination consists of questions designed to satisfy concerns committee members might have

regarding the quality of your work and gauge your ability to present the fruits of your research to

an academic audience.

Page 42: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

40

Evaluation Criteria and Standards

Your thesis manuscript will be evaluated in terms of the extent to which the body of the

manuscript conforms to the content outline detailed above, using the three-tiered rubric

below.

o “Excellent” = The student’s manuscript meets and exceeds expectations outlined above.

o “Adequate” = The student’s manuscript is meets all or most of the expectations outlined

above.

o “Poor” = The student’s manuscript does not meet many or most of the expectations

outlined above.

Your thesis defense presentation of research will be evaluated by your committee using the

three-tiered rubric below.

o “Excellent” = The student very clearly articulates the relevant theoretical perspectives

and issues within their topic, their research question, methodology, and key conclusions;

conclusions are discussed in a mature and thoughtful manner; student conveys

interpretations of findings completely accurately and supports claims with strong

evidence; presentation meets the length criterion (10-15 mins); student comports

themselves professionally in manner and dress.

o “Adequate” = The student articulates at least one relevant theoretical perspective and

issue within their topic, their research question, methodology, and key conclusions

somewhat clearly; conclusions are somewhat thoughtful; student conveys interpretations

of findings mostly accurately and supports claims with some evidence; presentation

meets the length criterion (10-15 mins); student comports themselves somewhat

professionally in manner and dress.

o “Poor” = The student does not clearly articulate relevant theoretical perspective and issue

within their topic, their research question, methodology, and key conclusions;

conclusions are missing or lack thoughtfulness; student misinterprets findings and does

not support claims with evidence; presentation does not meet the length criterion (10-15

mins); student does not comport themselves professionally in manner and dress.

Your response to the committee’s verbal examination will be evaluated using the three-

tiered rubric below.

o “Excellent” = The student very clearly addresses theoretical, methodological, analytical,

and substantive concerns raised by the committee; student demonstrates strong mastery

of knowledge of their research topic, research design, and methodological choices;

Page 43: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

41

student shows adeptness for thoughtful reflection; student comports themselves

professionally when responding to questions.

o “Adequate” = The student somewhat clearly addresses theoretical, methodological,

analytical, and substantive concerns raised by the committee; student demonstrates

moderate mastery of knowledge of their research topic, research design, and

methodological choices; student is capable of thoughtful reflection; student comports

themselves somewhat professionally when responding to questions.

o “Poor” = The student does not clearly addresses theoretical, methodological, analytical,

and substantive concerns raised by the committee; student demonstrates poor mastery of

knowledge of their research topic, research design, and methodological choices; student

does not engage in thoughtful reflection; student does not comport themselves somewhat

professionally when responding to questions.

Overall thesis approval, and subsequent degree completion, will be scored using a three-tier

rubric with the following categories and designations:

o “Pass” = The student’s work is very clear and shows exemplary insight and creativity;

research is excellently thought out and executed with appropriate methodology;

interpretations of findings are completely accurate and supported with strong evidence;

makes strong connections between thesis research and the topic/discipline.

o “Provisional Pass” or “Pass with Revisions” = The student’s work is somewhat clear

and shows satisfactory insight and creativity; research is somewhat well thought out and

executed with appropriate methodology; interpretations of findings are somewhat

accurate and somewhat supported with evidence; makes superficial/weak connections

between thesis research and the topic/discipline.

o “Fail” = The student’s work is vague/unclear and lacks insight and creativity; research is

poorly thought out and has poorly executed/inadequate methodology; interpretations of

findings are inaccurate and not supported with evidence; makes no connections between

thesis research and the topic/discipline; student’s work is incomplete or absent.

Page 44: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

42

Appendix F

Instructions for PDF/A file format

All thesis must be saved as PDF/A files prior to their final submission to the Dean of Graduate Studies.

The Portable Document Format (PDF) is a file format that allows documents from different word

processing programs to be opened uniformly and universally across any software programs, hardware, or

operating systems. Some thesis research will include dynamic images, data charts or tables, or image

content that must be viewable in its original form. Other research may include metadata file features that

are not conducive to preservation. The basic PDF file format does not ensure uniform long-term

preservation of documents or images according to archival standards of research libraries; however, the

PDF/A file format version does. PDF/A is an International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

version of the PDF file format that prohibits “dynamic content to ensure that the user sees the exact same

content both today and for years to come.”1 To ensure uniform quality and integrity of all theses,

completed theses must be saved in the PDF/A variation of the PDF file format.

Instructions:

Microsoft Word

Open a file in MS Word

Click “Save As”

Choose File Type of “PDF”

Before clicking “Save,” click on “Options”

From that menu, select the PDF-A option

Click Ok

Click Save

Adobe Acrobat

Open a PDF file in Adobe Acrobat

Click “Save As Other”

Click on “Archivable PDF (PDF/A)”

Click Save

Note, if using a MAC operating system for writing a thesis, students must download the Adobe Acrobat

software available to all Adrian College students in order to convert the file to PDF/A. To request Adobe

Acrobat, contact AC Information Services at [email protected] to request this software. Once

installed, follow the instructions for Adobe Acrobat above to convert the file to PDF/A.

1 PDF Association. “You ask, the PDF Association answers.” PDFA.org. http:// https://www.pdfa.org/pdfa-faq/?highlight=pdf%2Fa (accessed February 19, 2019).

Page 45: Master Thesis Handbook - Adrian Collegegrad.adrian.edu/docs/19-20 Graduate StudiesThesis Handbook.pdfpresentation is to solicit constructive criticism regarding the content and/or

2

Appendix G Copyright Page

The copyright page follows the title page. Include the information below. Single space the text, center it,

and locate it two inches bottom of the page.

-------CENTERED-----

© Year

Author’s Full Name

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

2”

All theses are published through the Shipman Library. By entering graduate programs at Adrian College

students consent to the publication of thesis projects and papers through the Shipman Library.

The copyright page of the thesis provides protection to the author against copyright infringement and

authenticates copyright ownership.

Students may also elect to register their work for copyright protection by visiting the U.S. Copyright

Office Webpage (https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-register.html) and following the instructions in

the section titled “Registering a Work.” This may add additional legal protections to student work in

cases where students intend to publish their work in the future. Please note, however, students do not

have to register for copyright protection in order to receive legal protections under copyright law. The

U.S. Copyright Office states “In general, registration is voluntary. Copyright exists from the moment a

work is created. You will have to register, however, if you wish to bring a lawsuit for infringement of a

U.S. work” (https://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html).