Upload
ernest-doyle
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Martindale-Hubbell® Small Law Firm Marketing Index
September 2005
2
Executive SummaryIn the summer of 2005, LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell commissioned a benchmarking study of howsmall law firms in the U.S. market their practices to prospective clients in an attempt to grow theirbusiness. The Martindale-Hubbell Small Law Firm Marketing Index, conducted by Harris
Interactive,surveyed nearly 1,000 small law firms nationwide (firms with 20 or fewer attorneys).
Below are some of the highlights from the study:
• Law firms are placing increased importance on marketing their practices as reflected in their budgets. The percentage of small firms spending 5% or more of their revenue on marketing doubled in the last three years, from 11% of firms in 2002 to 22% of firms in 2005;
• Marketing is one of the top “non-law” activities that take place in an average week. On average, practicing law takes up 63% of a lawyer’s week, managing their business accounts for 14% of the week, and marketing-related activities are next, responsible for 8% of the week;
• The firm Web site is perceived to be the most valuable marketing tactic for growing a small firm practice, with 80% of all firms reporting they have a Web site and 89% finding it valuable.
The goal of the study was to document key marketing initiatives, marketing spend and the most valued tactics in small firms. Read on to learn more about how firms market their practices today.
3
• Goal: Establish a series of benchmarks to document small law firm marketing efforts, including an assessment of the types of marketing tactics they find to be most successful.
• Methodology:– Harris Interactive conducted an online study among employees of
small law firms (defined as having 20 or fewer attorneys).
– The self-administered, online questionnaire was conducted using proprietary, Web-assisted interviewing software and took approximately 15 minutes to complete.
– All qualified respondents were either solely or partially responsible for the decision-making process of marketing their firm.
– Sample of current subscribers, past and non-subscribers used.
– A total of 967 surveys were completed.
Overview
4
6%
13%
48%
32%
11-20lawyers
6-10lawyers
2-5lawyers
Solo
Female25%
Male75%
5%
5%
7%
10%
10%
22%
Trusts & Estates
Criminal
Real estate
Personal injury
Family
General practice
Only responses of 5% or more are shown.
Main Area of PracticeSize of Firm
Gender
12%
49%
27%
10%
60+
46-59
35-45
25-34
Age Region
South36%
East20%
Midwest22%
West22%
Demographics of Respondents
5
Marketing Responsibility
6
The majority of marketing responsibility in law firms lies with a partner.
• In over two-thirds (68%) of firms, partners have primary responsibility for planning and executing marketing plans.
• Members/associates/paralegals (17%) or office managers/assistants/secretaries (11%) are next most likely to have this responsibility.
• In 9% of firms, outside sources (marketing consultant, outside agency, marketing service provider) have primary responsibility.
• 4% of firms have a marketing manager/director/officer with primary marketing responsibility.
9%
11%
4%
9%
11%
17%
68%Partner
Member/associate/paralegal
Office manager/assistant/secretary
Marketing consultant/Marketing service provider/
Outside agency
Marketing manager/director/officer
Other
None
Partners Drive Marketing Decisions
7
Partner
Member/associate/paralegal
Office manager/assistant/secretary
Marketing consultant/Marketing service provider/
Outside agency
Marketing manager/director/officer
Other
None7%
5%
13%
28%
20%
18%
72%
6%
6%
3%
16%
13%
20%
80%
5%
5%
3%
12%
7%
18%
78%
15%
22%
4%
5%
7%
13%
47%
Solo2-56-1011-20
• Solo practitioners, by nature, are more likely than larger firms (2-20 attorneys) to have no one in particular in a position of primary responsibility when it comes to planning and executing marketing for their firms.
• Larger firms (11-20 attorneys) rely more heavily on other members of staff for marketing responsibility, with 28% of firms reporting an office manager, assistant, or secretary having primary responsibility and 13% of firms reporting a marketing manager, director or officer.
Marketing Responsibility By Size
8
Marketing Spend
9
Law firms place increased importance on marketing their practice as reflected in their budgets.
– Half of law firms report spending over $5K on firm marketing.
– Firms spending 5% or more of their revenue on marketing doubled from three years ago from 11% to 22%.
– Firms spending $5K or more of their revenue jumped from 33% to 50%.
Marketing Spend
10
31%
24%
43%
18%
22%
8% 6%
11%
7% 4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0-1% 2% 3% 4% 5%+
Currently 3 years ago
► Firms are spending a greater percentage of their revenue on marketing than they did three years ago.
% of Revenue Spend on Marketing
% of Firms
% of Revenue
Upswing in Marketing Spend – Total
11
14%
28%
6%
25% 25%
4%
9%
19%16%
5%
15%9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
$0 - $1K $1,001 -$5K
$5,001-$10K
$10,001 -$20K
$20,001 -$50K
$50K+
Currently 3 years ago
$ Spend on Marketing
► Firms are spending a greater dollar amount on marketing than they did three years ago.% of Firms
$ Spent on Marketing
Upswing in Marketing Spend – Total
12
Spending among all segments has increased significantly over the past three years (see charts on following pages).
Solo practitioners: More than doubled in their spending of 5% or more (12% to 26%). Increased their spending of $20-50K by 300% (1% to 4%).
2-5 attorney firms: Nearly doubled in their spending of 5% or more (12% to 22%). Increased their spending of over $10K from 20% to 33%.
6-10 attorney firms: Doubled in their spending of 5% or more (6% to 12%). Increased their spending of over $50K from 9% to 13%.
11-20 attorney firms: The percentage of those spending 5% or more quadrupled from 5% to 20%. More than doubled their spending of over $50K from 5% to 13%.
Marketing Spend
13
28%
22%
44%
17%
26%
11%
6%
12%
6% 5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0-1% 2% 3% 4% 5%+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Revenue Spend on Marketing by Solo Practitioners
% of Firms
% of Revenue
% Revenue Spend Among Solos
14
$ Spend on Marketing by Solo Practitioners
22%
38%39%
28%
< 1%
4%
19%
12%
1%1%
13%
5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
$0 - $1K $1,001 -$5K
$5,001-$10K
$10,001 -$20K
$20,001 -$50K
$50K+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Firms
$ Spent on Marketing
$ Spend Among Solos
15
31%
24%
40%
18%
22%
7% 6%
12%
7%3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0-1% 2% 3% 4% 5%+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Revenue Spend on Marketing by 2-5 Attorney Firms
% of Firms
% of Revenue
% Revenue Spend Among 2-5 Attorney Firms
16
$ Spend on Marketing by 2-5 Attorney Firms
12%
20%
16%
10%7%
21%
13%10%
6%4%
26%
27%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
$0 - $1K $1,001 -$5K
$5,001-$10K
$10,001 -$20K
$20,001 -$50K
$50K+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Firms
$ Spent on Marketing
$ Revenue Spend Among 2-5 Attorney Firms
17
38%
31%
49%
19%
12%
5% 4%6%
5%2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0-1% 2% 3% 4% 5%+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Revenue Spend on Marketing by 6-10 Attorney Firms
% of Firms
% of Revenue
% Revenue Spend Among 6-10 Attorney Firms
18
$ Spend on Marketing by 6-10 Attorney Firms
9%
18%15%
13%
17%20%
9%7%
9%
18%18%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
$0 - $1K $1,001 -$5K
$5,001-$10K
$10,001 -$20K
$20,001 -$50K
$50K+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Firms
$ Spent on Marketing
$ Revenue Spend Among 6-10 Attorney Firms
19
36%
23%
39%
20%20%
2%
8%5%11%
7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
0-1% 2% 3% 4% 5%+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Revenue Spend on Marketing by 11-20 Attorney Firms
% of Firms
% of Revenue
% Revenue Spend Among 11-20 Attorney Firms
20
$ Spend on Marketing by 11-20 Attorney Firms
7%
21% 20%
13%
8%
20%23%
11%
5%
20%
7%
13%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
$0 - $1K $1,001 -$5K
$5,001-$10K
$10,001 -$20K
$20,001 -$50K
$50K+
Currently 3 years ago
% of Firms
$ Spent on Marketing
$ Revenue Spend Among 11-20 Attorney Firms
21
Time Spent on Firm Marketing
22
2%
6%
8%
8%
63%
14%
Other
Professional/PersonalDevelopment
Conducting Research
Marketing/BusinessDevelopment
Managing Practice
Practicing Law• Aside from practicing law and
managing their practice, law firms spend much of their week engaged in marketing/business development activities (8%):
– Same amount of time is spent on conducting research (8%).
– Lesser percentage of time is spent on professional development (6%).
Marketing is an integral part of a lawyer’s time at work.
Marketing is Among the Top “Non-Law” Activities
23
• As compared to respondents in smaller firms (1-10 attorneys), respondents in larger firms (11-20 attorneys) tend to spend less time actually practicing law, and more time in marketing/business development.
• These larger firm respondents (11-20 attorneys):
– spend a greater percentage of their time in an average week than smaller firms (1-10 attorneys) on marketing/business development (12% vs. 7%)
– spend a lesser percentage of time than smaller firms (1-10 attorneys) on practicing law (58% vs. 63%)
2% 6%8%
14%63%
7%
3%
12%
16%
58%
6%6%
11-20 Attorney Firms
1-10 Attorney Firms
Law Firm Activities
Marketing/Business development
Practicing law
Managing the practice
Conducting research
Professional/Personal development
Other
Marketing is Among the Top “Non-Law” Activities
243%
6%
6%
12%
16%
58%
1%
6%
7%
8%
15%
63%
2%
6%
8%
7%
14%
63%
2%
6%
8%
8%
13%
64%
Other
Professional/PersonalDevelopment
Conducting research
Marketing/BusinessDevelopment
Managing Practice
Practicing Law
Solo
2-5
6-10
11-20
Marketing is Among the Top “Non-Law” Activities
25
Utilization of Marketing Tactics
26
%Spend on Marketing Tactics
22%20% 19%
13%
6%5%
3% 3% 2% 1%
25%
21%
18%
6%5%
3% 3%1% 1%
7%
12%
7%
2005 2002
Yellow pages
Client entertainment
Legal directorylistings
FirmWeb sites
Event sponsorships
Giving/hosting
seminars
PR/writing articles
Referralservices
Local outdoor ads
Paid-per-clickplacements
Sponsorships on legal Web sites
► Law firms spend a smaller percentage of their revenue on print or online yellow pages today than they did three years ago (22% vs. 25%).
Yellow pages, client entertainment and legal listings are the top three most utilized marketing tactics among law firms.
Directory Listings and Client InteractionAre Preferred
27
While law firms devote their marketing budgets to similar tactics, size tends to dictate the percentage of their budgets allocated to certain tactics.
Larger firms (6-20 attorneys)
• Larger firms allocate more of their budget to client meals and entertainment than smaller firms (30% vs. 18%).
• Larger firms tend to spend almost twice as much on event sponsorships (11% vs. 6%) and giving/hosting seminars (11% vs. 5%) than smaller firms.
Smaller firms (1-5 attorneys)
• Smaller firms spend twice as much of their budget on print/online yellow pages than larger firms (24% vs. 13%).
• Solo practitioners spend more on referral services than firms with more than 1 attorney (5% vs. 3%).
How Size Affects Choice of Marketing Tactics
28
Current % Spending On Marketing Tactics
23%
16%
21%
14%
5%6%
5% 5%
2% 2%1%
25%
19% 19%
11%
7%5%
4%3%
4%2% 2%
14%
30%
15% 15%
8%6%
5%
2%4%
1%2%
11%
32%
10%
14%
11% 11%
7%
1%2%
1% 1%
Solo 2-5 6-10 11-20
Client entertainment
Legal directorylistings
Firmwebsites
Event sponsorships
Giving/hosting
seminars
PR/writing articles
Referralservices
Local outdoor ads
Paid-per-clickplacements
Sponsorships on legal Web sites
Yellow pages
Current % Spending on Marketing Tactics
29
Web sites are considered a primary marketing tool for growing a firm’s practice.
30%
37%
46%
51%
68%
68%
75%
78%
79%
85%
89% • The most valuable marketing tools small firms use to grow their practice include:
– Law firm Web sites– Printed/online legal directory
listings– Public/media relations/writing
articles– Giving/hosting seminars
• Yellow pages as a valuable tactic is rated a distant 6th at 68%.
• Of law firms surveyed, the law firm Web site was deemed as the most valuable tactic to growing their practice.
• 89% of firms find value in a firm Web site.
Law firm Web sites
Printed/online legal directory/listings
Giving/hosting seminars
Client meals/entertainment
Print/online yellow pages
Event sponsorships/community events
Referral services
Public/media relations/writing articles
Sponsorship/placement on legal Web sites
Paid-per-click placements on search engines
Local outdoor advertising
*Top 3 box score (Very Valuable, Valuable, Somewhat Valuable)
Perceived Value of Marketing Tactics
% Respondents that Indicated Tactic as Valuable*
30
94%
78%
53%
65%
54%
65%72%
76%85%
78%
89%
80%74%
84%
56%
40%45%
35%
74%82%
67%
81%
90%
48%
35%
43%
25%
66%
86%
66%
79%79%
89%
40%
24%
36%
16%
80%
56%
86%
74%67%
66%
81%
< 34 yrs. old 35-45 yrs. old 46-59 yrs. old 60+ yrs. old
► In general, younger respondents tend to value law firm Web sites, referral services, paid-per-click placements, and sponsorships on legal Web sites more than older respondents.
► Generation gap is closed by tactics like print/online legal directory listings and client entertainment.
Perceived value of marketing tactics often varies by age of respondent.*
FirmWeb sites
Client entertainment
Legal directorylistings
Event sponsorships
Giving/hosting
seminars
PR/writing articles
Referralservices
Local outdoor ads
Paid-per-clickplacements
Sponsorships on legal Web sites
Yellowpages
*Top 3 box score (Very Valuable, Valuable, Somewhat Valuable)
Perceived Value of Marketing Tactics
31
Significance of Internet Marketing
32
Law firms are embracing the Internet to promote their practice, and are using the latest techniques to attract potential clients.
• 89% of firms perceive value to promoting their practice via a firm Web site (28% very valuable, 31% valuable, 30% somewhat valuable).
• Web sites are more prevalent among firms that spend more than $5K,compared to those that spend less (88% vs. 69%).
Significance of Internet Marketing
20% of firms do not have a Web site
► 50% use search engine optimization
► 25% use paid placement on search engines
► 12% use online advertising
Base: Have firm Web site (n=770)
80% of firms have a Web site
20% of firms do not have a Web site
► 6% use listings on Legal sites such as Martindale-Hubbell, FindLaw, etc.
► 3% use blogs
33
Successful Marketing Tactics
34
Networking and word-of-mouth are still key to building a law practice, however, emerging activities are also prevalent in integrated marketing campaigns.
Marketing Tactic
% Respondents that Indicated Tactic as
Valuable*
% Mktg Budget Spent on Tactics
Law Firm Web site 89% 13%
Printed or Online Legal Directory Listings 85% 19%
Public/Media Relations/Writing Articles 79% 5%
Giving or Hosting Seminars 78% 6%
Client Meals and Entertainment 75% 20%
Print or Online Yellow Pages 68% 22%
Events Sponsorships/Community Events 68% 7%
Referral Services 51% 3%
Sponsorships/Placements on Legal Web sites 46% 1%
Local Outdoor Advertising 30% 3%
Paid-per-click Placement on Search Engines 37% 2%
What’s Working?
* Top 3 box score (Very Valuable, Valuable, Somewhat Valuable)
35
Detailed Methodology
36
A study of small law firms was conducted by Harris Interactive on behalf of Martindale-Hubbell. A total of 967 interviews were conducted via an online survey between May 31 - June 27, 2005 among employees of small law firms (defined as having 20 or fewer employees). The length of the questionnaire was approximately 15 minutes.
SAMPLE SELECTION
Sample of current subscribers, past subscribers and non-subscribers was provided by Martindale-Hubbell.
Qualified respondents for this study identified themselves as working as a sole practitioner or in a law firm with 20 or fewer lawyers and were either solely or partially responsible for the decision-making process of marketing their firm.
ONLINE INTERVIEWING PROCEDURESInterviews were conducted using a self-administered, online questionnaire, via proprietary, Web-assisted interviewing software. The HPOL interviewing system permitted online data entry of interviews by the respondents. Questionnaires were programmed into the system with the following checks: 1. Question and response series2. Skip pattern3. Question rotation4. Range checks5. Mathematical checks6. Consistency checks7. Special edit procedures
Detailed Methodology
37
Detailed Methodology (cont.)
ONLINE INTERVIEWING PROCEDURES (cont’d)
To maintain the reliability and integrity in the sample, each invitation contained a password that is uniquely assigned to that e-mail address. A respondent was required to enter the password at the beginning of the survey to gain access into the survey. Password protection ensured that a respondent completed the survey only one time.
To increase the number of respondents in the survey and to improve overall response rates, up to two additional reminder invitations are typically mailed at 2-4 day intervals to those respondents who have not yet participated in the survey.
To increase the number of respondents in the survey and to improve overall response rates, respondents were provided with a summary of some of the survey responses. This too was done via the Internet. Respondents were sent an email that provided them access to a Web site that contained the survey findings. As with the survey itself, this was a password protected site that was accessible for a limited period (1-2 weeks).
All data were then tabulated, checked for internal consistency and processed by computer. A series of computer-generated tables were produced for each of the key sample groups that showed the results of each survey question, both by the total number of respondents and by the key subgroups.