Mars Atmosphere Microwave Brightness bserver · PDF file4.5.1 Experiment Master ... a basic approach to develop the Mars Atmosphere Microwave Brightness ... Undertakings in term of

Jet PropulsionLaboratory

PART 4: Management, Developmentand Cost Plan

Mars Atmosphere Microwave Brightness Observer

Table of contents

LERMA – LMDObservatoire de Paris - IPSL

MAMBOon MARS PREMIER

Vol. n° :4Title :Management, Development & CostPage :2 / 29




4 MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT AND COST PLANS................................................................................. 5

4.1 MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN. ............................................................................................................. 54.1.1 Management and responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 54.1.2 Model philosophy ....................................................................................................................................... 104.1.3 CFE Model philosophy............................................................................................................................... 14

4.2 PRODUCT ASSURANCE AND QUALITY ................................................................................................................... 144.2.1 PHASES AND REVIEWS............................................................................................................................ 154.2.2 EXPERIMENT TEST MATRIX ................................................................................................................... 16

4.3 GROUND SEGMENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................. 164.4 PUBLIC OUTREACH........................................................................................................................................ 164.5 SCHEDULE AND MILESTONES..................................................................................................................... 17

4.5.1 Experiment Master Network ....................................................................................................................... 174.5.2 Network Maintenance................................................................................................................................. 174.5.3 Milestones................................................................................................................................................... 174.5.4 MAMBO MASTER SCHEDULE................................................................................................................. 17

4.6 COST AND FUNDING ............................................................................................................................................. 194.6.1 Funding Status............................................................................................................................................ 194.6.2 Hardware cost ............................................................................................................................................ 204.6.3 Cost of Facilities and Workforce during phases B and C/D: ..................................................................... 224.6.4 Cost evaluation of Phase E (Mission Operation and Data Analysis). ....................................................... 254.6.5 Cost evaluation Summary. .......................................................................................................................... 264.6.6 Details of Cost Evaluation for Workforce. ................................................................................................. 27







4 MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT AND COST PLANSThe scope of this document is to define a basic approach to develop the Mars Atmosphere MicrowaveBrightness Observer (MAMBO) instrument expected to be implemented on the 2007 MARS PREMIEROrbiter. That covers the different phases from the design to the integration and tests.In our baseline plan, Foreign Scientific Laboratories will supply some elements. They are called CustomerFurnished Equipment (CFE). Due to the context of co-operation between Scientific Laboratories and CNESand the several Customer Undertakings in term of engineering inputs and Customer Furnished Equipment(CFE), a particular attention shall be paid to milestones where mutual deliveries are necessary.

4.1 Management and development plan.The instrument is developed in a design-to-cost approach using as often as possible space-qualified off-the-shelf equipment. Margin will be traceable and summation of margins will be explained and justified.

4.1.1 Management and responsibilities

4.1.1.1 Project management approach

MAMBO development interfaces are shown in figure below.

Following the instrument break-down structure, next page presents the working break-down structureproposed at LERMA/LMD



Vol. n° :4Title:Management, Developpement, CostPage :6 / 30

Co –ILMD, LESIA, LERMA, Obs Bordeaux,

JPL, MPAE

Product AssuranceTBD

System EngineerM.Gheudin (LERMA)

Project ControllerExternal Support

Technical GroundSegment

Obs Bdx + ExternalSupport + CNES

AIVJ-M.Krieg (LERMA)

+ External support

PowerProcessorContractor

LogisticsExternal support

Scientific Ground SegmentLERMA/LMD/Obs Bordeaux

Instrument Expert groupLESIA, LMD, JPL, MPAE, SSC, . .

PIF.Forget (LMD)

Experiment ManagerA.Deschamps (LERMA)

Instrument ScientistG.Beaudin (LERMA)

SpectrometersSSC & MPAE

Telescope &Calibration system

Contractor

Data ProcessorUnit

Contractor +LMD

IF ProcessorL.Riley (JPL)

Front EndElectronicsLERMA +Contractor

Microwave ArchitectA.Maestrini (LERMA)

PerformanceManagement

LERMA

ExperimentManagement

SubsystemManagement

CNES Support.Indsutrial contractorsManagementConfig. ManagementQualityDocumentationGround segment &instrumentationsupport

Figure 4-1MAMBO working break-down structure for phases B,C,D.




4.1.1.1.1 Team OrganizationThe MAMBO Experiment will be carried out by a small, efficiently integrated team with complementaryskills. A focused, streamlined management structure, that is essential for a cost constrained and schedule-driven experiment that crosses international borders will be employed. The PI is responsible for the scientificdirection with ultimate accountability to the CNES Mars Premier Project for the MAMBO Experimentsuccess. The PI has delegated responsibility for technical instrument management to the ExperimentManager at Paris Observatory (OP) -LERMA. The technical team, formed between the Observatoire deParis, JPL, SSC and the Max Planck Institut fur Aeronomie (MPAE), will be tightly coordinated. There is adirect mapping of the experiment's products as shown in the MAMBO block diagram into areas ofcognisance by each project element manager (PEM). Therefore, the responsibility and authority forproducing a particular system is unambiguous. In addition, the organization is designed to reducemanagement overhead and facilitate upward and downward communications. Lastly, the organization hasclear, short lines of communication between all team members to facilitate rapid decision making.

4.1.1.1.2 Entities responsibilities

The programmatic management of MAMBO development will be done under a scientific collaborationshared between LMD/LERMA and CNES and between European and US scientific laboratories JPL, SSC,MPAE.

The principal Investigator (PI) François FORGET of "Laboratoire de Métrologie Dynamique" (LMDFrance), co-investigators of "Observatoire de Paris" (OP France) and co-investigators of "Jet PropulsionLaboratrory" (JPL / USA) are jointly responsible for the overall development of MAMBO instrument.

Gérard BEAUDIN is the Instrument Scientist and André Deschamps is the MAMBO Experiment Manager;both from "Observatoire De Paris LERMA"

LERMA / LMD project management will ensure the performance achievement and cost and schedulecontrol. LERMA has set up documentary management rules for phase-A and following phases. These rulescover all document types and circulation and archiving process. The relation with industrial partners ismanaged through a dedicated person and appropriate document.

In phases B,C,D, this management will be optimized to deal with a higher amount of documents and will besupported by CNES document management service. In particular, the configuration management will bedealt with referring to CNES experience.

Technical internal notes are created and updated in order to keep technical requirements up-to-date and tocontrol functional and component performances. A global data base (requirements and performances) isbeing developed at LERMA. It will be available on-line by team members and updated continuously. Thisdatabase will serve to trace the project technical evolutions and to support configuration management.

LERMA / LMD will also develop a model of development for MAMBO instrument and perform early(preliminary) risk analysis. A risk management procedure is considered of highest priority to identify andcontrol technical, planning and organizational risks.

All these management procedures are developed and implemented at LERMA with the support of SEGIME.

CNES will support MAMBO development for technologies, Product Assurance, Management anddevelopment methods and contracts supervision with the industry.




For this mission, Scientific Laboratories under OP/CNES interface will supply for identified elements. Theyare called Customer Furnished Equipment (CFE).

4.1.1.1.2.1 Sub-contractor/Prime contractor Policy

This drawing describes the relationship between LERMA ( prime responsible) with CNES support, primecontractor and partners in our baseline development plan..

IndustryPrime Contractor

CNESBudget/Technology

supportArDBG

LMDIPSL

ScienceUserPI

LERMAObservatoire de Paris

ProgramManagement

Omnisys/SSCTechnical [CFE] Partner

MPAeScientific & Technical

[CFE] Partner

JPLScientific & Technical

[CFE] Partner

Figure 4-2

MAMBO Project organization

4.1.1.1.3 Industrial partnershipWe plan to develop a strong partnership between LERMA and Industrial Partner. The LERMA /LMD willhave prime responsibility on the project (schedule and delivery to Orbiter) and Industrial Partner willresponsible on the development (PDEV, PVP, PIE )

The different responsibilities will be shared as described:

LERMA Prime contractorManagement LERMA is responsible on the schedule and delivery to Orbiter

The partners are both responsible on the : PDEV, PVP, PIEManagement • MAMBO Configuration

management• RD

• Instrument configuration, ICD




Quality • Product assurance• Quality Plan

• Quality assurance• Industrial products• AIT

Engineering • Microwave architecture• Budgets• Instrument performance

• Design office• AMT• Environment & EMC• Budget analysis• Software

Procurement • Procurement for CFEs• Redaction of relatives IRD & IRC

• Industrial Part procurement:structure harness, PDCU, etc.

• Redaction of IRD & IRCAIT • AIT support

• To provide for facilities andsimulators

• AIT• EGSE

Table 4.1 Management shared responsibilities

• Part procurement will be under the responsibility of the industry.

• French responsibility and CFE partnership procurement responsibility are as below.Customer Furnished Equipment is developed through a cost-effective and time-to-cost approach.CFE responsibilities are as follows:JPL ( USA) Lance Riley is the manager for Phase Lock, Lo, and IFP including synthesizers.SSC (Sweden) Urban Frisk is the manager for the AC spectrometers, with OMNISYS as

industrial partner.MPAE ( Germany) Paul Hartog is the manager for the AC spectrometers.




CalibrationLoad

FrequencyTripler

ScanMechanism

23-cm Off-Axis

335 GHzReceiver

PowerProcessor

HKP USO

Receive

Backen

IF Processor FrequencySynthesizer

Spectrometers

PowerProcessor

CPU

Electronics

Int

S/CDataB

S/CPowerB

Signal

Phase LockedOscillator

US French German/Swedish

Figure 4-3 Schematic drawing of the MAMBO subsystem and the reponsabilities planned in our baselinedevelopment plan.

4.1.2 Model philosophy

4.1.2.1 MAMBO sub-systems breadboards

In order to reduce cost and delays, breadboard models are not envisaged except for the 330-GHz front-endreceiver for which a DM enters in our global risk management approach.




4.1.2.2 MAMBO Structural, Thermal and Pyrotechnic Model (STPM)

The STPM will be a dummy model compliant with mass, power but not shape and will allow full mechanicaland thermal interfaces with Orbiter model. This choice is compliant with our cost-effective and time-to-costphilosophy.

4.1.2.3 MAMBO Engineering Model (EM)

An EQM is not foreseen due to short development and test delays. The schedule and cost plan leave nopossibility to a qualification campaign.MAMBO engineering electronic model will allow full functionaltesting.This approach implies to take a larger margin on PFM AIT and more environmental test risks.

4.1.2.4 MAMBO Numerical Simulator (NS)A “MAMBO Numerical Simulator” (NS) is planned, with two major goals:

- Testing the interface with the Orbiter. This is achieved by using the OrbiterFunctional Model (OFM). The OFM is used to test electrical and functionalinterfaces (to the exclusion of EMI-EMC).

- Perform he functional analysis of MAMBO (power, data processing and transfer,TM/TC, memory) including the Mission Centre (Observatoire de Bordeaux).

After EM and interface tests, the retrofit of the EM might be used as spare model. If at some point, the EM isnot available, the NS might be useful to test MAMBO functionality.The NS might be used also to upgradespare components.The NS is developed by the prime contractor. It is mainly composed of a power PC and a1553-protocol port.

4.1.2.5 MAMBO Proto-Flight Model (PFM)A proto-flight model philosophy is planned in order to stick to schedule objectives.In this approach, the main criticality stands in the small amount of time available for AIV. In order tosuppress this criticality, this PFM philosophy will be taken into account in AIV schedule.

4.1.2.6 MAMBO Spare Model (SM)Referring to the cost plan and schedule, a full Spare Model will not be developed.Alternative solutions are ::1. Given the development schedule, the spare model can be delivered 6 months after the flight model.2. The spare model is a “kit” model and will be a retrofit of the electronic model components.

Special care will be brought to the components used in the EM (commercial non-space-qualifiedcomponents, interfaces,…).In this way, a Spare Model will be available at low cost.

4.1.2.7 Verification and tests

Test on MAMBO STM�Mechanisms and actuators (pyrotechnic as well, if any) will be qualified independently ofMAMBO STM and will not be implemented on this model.

�During the phase B, some analyses will be performed concerning:




- the electrical behavior of power and data bus,

- the robustness of the architecture,

- some EMI/EMC predictions,

- The radiation by sector of MAMBO instrument (TBC).

�During the phase C, some pre-qualification electrical tests shall be done, using EngineeringModels of equipment, in the MAMBO Engineering Model. So, OP/CNES shall provide the PrimeContractor with Engineering Models of the CFE.

Structure, models of other equipment units shall be integrated and shacked at qualification levels. A modelof CFE (STM model) will be delivered by OP.

Test On MAMBO EM:The purpose is to validate functional performances. This validation will be done using preliminarysoftware version (or final if available). The main objectives are:

- GSE / MAMBO compatibility (validation of AIT procedure), under industry responsibility

- hardware/software compatibility, assessed by industry

- functional/performances, under LERMA / LMD responsibility

- EMC (as a first assessment) assessed by industry

Test on MAMBO PFM:

Functional / performance tests:

- hardware/software compatibility, under industry responsibility

- functional/performances under LERMA / LMD responsibility

Electrical tests:- EMC CE, CS, RE, RS., under industry responsibility

Mechanical and thermal tests:

- Proto-qualification of the MAMBO flight system (qualification level, acceptance duration).

The PFM and Spare Models shall be units built from production tooling, with qualified material,parts and processes according to all configuration control and Product Assurance provisions. TheFM and SM have to be submitted to all qualification and/or acceptance tests successfully.

Test on power Control:

• The Power Budget is updated all along the development phases and particularly after the differentreviews at equipment level (PDR, CDR) and is checked with regard to the Power Supply sizing and thedifferent protections (fuses, limiters, circuit breakers).

• Mechanical, thermal, electrical, interface and software studies and developments in phases B,C,D will bemade in accordance with CNES development plan document (MARS-ON-MAMBO-002-CNES).




Interface control :• Preliminary geometrical ICDs, based on allowable volume and interface requirements, will be issued at

the end of the complementary study.These ICDs shall be refined during phase B, when configuration monitoring will begin.• A particular attention will be paid on the mass, inertia and CoG properties of MAMBO and equipment

properties throughout the development.• The command/control ICD with the Orbiter will be developed by the industrial prime contractor and

presented at the PDR review.• During the phase C, a preliminary version of the Operations and User’s Manual is written and delivered

at the CDR review under LERMA/LMD responsibility.

Based on Performance Verification Plan, the Prime Contractor shall define in the ITP of all Orbitermodels (STPM, OFM, PFM).

Responsibilities for tests, verification and qualification:

LERMA / LMD is responsible for delivery of all CFE, and thus for the qualification of:

- Back-End equipment units (see table 13-1).

- Transport and storage containers,

- ICD.

- Acceptance Data Package and LogBook (End Item Data Package).

- User's manual.

- Handling and storage manual.

- Dedicated EGSE, MGSE, simulators (if necessary) and associated user's manual and procedures.

- Module Tests Requirements (common content defined by the Prime Contractor, requirementsaccepted by the Prime Contractor).

- If necessary, procedures run at sub-assembly level (as help).

All functional/performance tests (if needed) performed on CFE using only dedicated EGSE will beperformed by OP (or CFE responsible) under OP responsibility and procedure. The LERMA/LMD isresponsible of all AIT procedures and performs mechanical and electrical integration of all CFE inaccordance with requirements. During these activities a permanent support of CFE representativewill be provided to the Prime Contractor.

The Prime Contractor is responsible of all performance tests activities and write associated procedure andtest sequence at MAMBO flight system level. OP and/or CFE responsible will provide real-time expertise.The instrument shall be operated through the spacecraft interfaces and using the spacecraft EGSE.The Prime Contractor will issue all NCR during AIT activities. OP will provide support and expertise forNCR treatment and closure. (See Product Assurance requirements).




4.1.2.8 Mechanical Ground Support EquipmentThe Mechanical Ground Support Equipment (MGSE) to support the MAMBO experiment duringtransportation, handling, and integration will be delivered together with the appropriate documentation. TheMGSE for the EM will be reused for the PFM where feasible.

4.1.2.9 Electrical Ground Support EquipmentThe Electrical Ground Support Equipment (EGSE) and associated software will be delivered with the EM.The delivered EGSE will be either replaced or updated for the PFM delivery to maintain compatibility. Itwill be under full Configuration Control after delivery. The Principal Investigator will provide maintenancefacilities for the EGSE and spares on an as-needed basis to minimize schedule delays caused by EGSEmalfunction. Operation of the EGSE will be the responsibility of the PI.

4.1.2.10 Deliverable SoftwareThe following software and associated documentation, in support of system level verification, will bedelivered.Software sequences required performing the experiment bench level CNES acceptance testsSoftware sequences required performing the system level tests in real-time or off-line modeAuxiliary software sequences necessary to perform the investigations, including diagnosis on the experiment,experiment EGSE and interfacesDetailed documentation of the delivered softwareAcceptance test report stating operational readiness of all software items intended for use during system testand launch operationsSoftware maintenance and configuration logbook to be established at delivery and containing the CNESMars-Premier Project approved software updates implemented during system level testing.MAMBO experiment database

4.1.3 CFE Model philosophyThe CFE model philosophy will be compliant with the MAMBO philosophy.

4.2 Product assurance and qualityThe product assurance application will be in charge of the industry and the CFE, under the PO/LERMAcontrol ( and CNES support), in accordance to the Mars Premier product-assurance plan.The MAMBO equipment will employ commercial components, excepted for the interfaces with the platformequipment. A qualitative analysis (Hazard Analysis and preliminary risk analysis) will be performed todocument the potential hazard arising from materials, source of energy, facilities or operations. It details thenature of the hazard with its classification, and describes the safety considerations and/or requirements to beused for eliminating or reducing the hazard potential.Single point failure analysis will be done. The twin-receiver design associated to multiple spectrometerarchitecture gives reasonable redundancy. The CO and H2O channels in the IF processor have identicaldesigns allowing the analysis of these lines in case of a failure of a part of the IF processor.Furthermore, the interfaces with the Orbiter bus are doubled in the PDCU.




4.2.1 PHASES AND REVIEWS

4.2.1.1 Definition and preliminary design phases

*There are 2 main phases:

Phase A :

During this two months phase, the industry is involved. Two industrial studies are performed inparallel. The objective of that phase is to improve the definition of MAMBO instrument andinterfaces. This set of requirements shall be the baseline inputs for the Final Request For Proposal.

Bidding Phase

The bidding phase will take place from July 2002 to October 2002. The Prime Contractor will beselected during this phase.

Phase B :

This phase shall be conducted along with the selected Prime Contractor who shall improve the levelof definition of MAMBO and then, shall start the preliminary design activities in coordination withsome sub-contractors. The Interface Control Document’s may be updated but always under theChange Control Process which guarantees a mutual agreement between all contributors after anexhaustive assessment of the different impacts (cost and schedule). That phase ends with aPreliminary Design Review (PDR) at MAMBO level and possibly some PDR’S at sub-assembliesor/and equipment units level.

4.2.1.2 Design, Fabrication and Procurement phases

Phase C:

During that phase, the design of MAMBO is completed and validated by Analysis and Tests withDevelopment Models. The process shall be different for each equipment unit and shall be function ofits state : recurrent and qualified, recurrent but with a delta-qualification to be done, existing to bemodified, to be designed from scratch.

A Structural and Thermal Model (STM) shall be build during this phase. This model shall bedelivered to 2007 Orbiter team after mechanical and thermal qualification tests. Qualification testdone at Orbiter level using MAMBO STM shall consolidate or update environmental specificationsfor PFM.

A MAMBO Numerical Simulator (NS) and Engineering Model (EM) shall be built for designconsolidation and functional and performance assessment. These models (or similar) shall bedelivered to 2007 Orbiter.

At the end of this phase, the different Critical Design Reviews (CDR’s) shall take place (subassemblies and MAMBO levels). These reviews shall be mandatory (deviations to that rule may beassessed case by case) to authorize any fabrication or procurement of Flight Hardware.

Phase D:

This phase is dedicated to :

- the fabrication and procurement of all the Flight Hardware,

- the integration of the MAMBO Proto-Flight instrument,

- the Flight Software




- and then all the process of qualification to environment up to the final Acceptance anddelivery.

- In parallel, MAMBO Kit Spare Model components will be refurbished from EM components.

4.2.2 EXPERIMENT TEST MATRIXA MAMBO Verification Test Matrix will summarize the tests that will be performed on the MAMBOExperiment Units, Assemblies, and Subassemblies.

The purpose of the matrix is to provide a reference to the contents of the test program to prevent deletion of aportion without an alternative means of accomplishing the objectives, to ensure that all flight hardware hasseen environmental exposure that are sufficient to demonstrate acceptable workmanship, and providetraceability of qualification heritage of the hardware. The matrices cover all the models including flightspares.

4.3 Ground segment development planAs described in the “technical and data plan” section, The MAMBO GDS will consists of the followingdistributed components:• A control center (CNES): responsible for the production of L0 data, interacts with the platform and the

mission center.• A MAMBO mission center (LMD): scientifically responsible for the MAMBO mission, determines

operation modes, interacts with the data production center, the science center, and the control center.Requires minimum the science PI, instrumental PI, platform PI, ground-segment PI.

• A Data Production Center to produce official MAMBO data : production of L1, L2, L3 and L4 data.• A Data distribution center (in practice the Planetary atmospghere database)• A science Center(gathering various centers) gathering modeling, off-line assimilation, science working

groups, validation, exogen data, forecasts, etc.• A Public Outreach Server, opened to a wide scientific and non-scientific community giving on the net

almost real-time info on the MAMBO project.

The development will be under the responsabilities of the PI, with assistance from Bordeaux observatory onthe basis of the experience developped for the ODIN satellite experiment. It wil involve secondary center inGermany, the USA, Sweden.

4.4 PUBLIC OUTREACH

Education and Public Outreach (EPO) is of uttermost importance in a such a public funding project.At least , throughout the whole duration of the mission, in addition to the above module, public will be keptinformed about the MAMBO science goals, instrumentation and progress to date by developing a world wideweb site on the internetIn addition, depending of the CNES policy and support, we could collaborate with professional scienceeducators. At an international level, one team member from each participating country would be designatedto serve on a MAMBO education committee to determine the nature of the module- CNRS/INSU- NASA…




4.5 SCHEDULE AND MILESTONES

4.5.1 Experiment Master NetworkThe Principal Investigator delegates to the Experiment Manager the implementation of a system of planningreporting and progress control by means of an Experiment Master Network.

The Experiment Master Network will cover the entire experiment development schedule.Interfaces of an internal and external nature such as hardware and software deliveries, reviews, etc., will beclearly identified as milestones by CNES.

4.5.2 Network MaintenanceThe Principal Investigator delegates to the Experiment Manager the responsibility for the Experiment MasterNetwork maintenance and reporting of any updates.The Principal Investigator will provide detailed task breakdown if necessary during program execution.

4.5.3 MilestonesA set of milestones derived from the Experiment Master Network, agreed to by CNES Office and theMAMBO Experiment, will be used for progress control, reporting and trend analysis. These mutually agreedupon milestones will be under formal configuration control.

4.5.4 MAMBO MASTER SCHEDULE

The following table presents a summary of MAMBO milestones.All dates and duration indicated in the here after table are (TBD) by the prime contractor.

As suggested by CNES in accordance with Orbiter schedule.

Phases Main activities Duration (months) Start Complete

A Preliminary design (feasibility) 2 04-2002 05-2002

Preliminary design 12 11-2002 11-2003B

PDR review - - 11-2003

Consolidated Design 10 11-2003 09-2004C

CDR review - - 09-2004

FM fabrication and procurement 16 09-2004 01-2006

MAMBO EM AIT 5 09-2004 02-2005

MAMBO PFM AIT 5 03-2005 07-2005D

MAMBO SM AIT 5 08-2005 01-2006

Table -4-4 : MAMBO/Orbiter master schedule




4.5.4.1 Prime contractor deliverables

The table here after indicates the main items to be delivered by MAMBO prime contractor.

Phase Item Delivery date

B CFE IRD (preliminary) t0 phase B

+1 months

B CFE IRD (final) t0 phase B

+3 months

C MAMBO STM 09-2004

C MAMBO Numerical Simulator 08-2004

D MAMBO EM 03-2005

D MAMBO PFM 01-2006

D MAMBO SM 01-2006

Table 12-4-5: Prime contractor deliverables

4.5.4.2 CFE DELIVERABLES

Delivery dates indicated in here after tables shall be taken into account in MAMBOdevelopment schedule with, at least, 20 days margin.

Phase MAMBOModel

Item Delivery date

B CFE specifications t0 phase B

B CFE ICD PDR - 6 months

B CFE Nastran & Thermal Model PDR - 6 months

C STM CFE STM 03/2004

C EM CFE EM 09/2004

D PFM CFE PFM 03/2005

D SM CFE SM 08/2005

Table 13-4-6: CFE deliverables

4.5.4.3 Ground segment schedule




WP Tasks

WP 1 MAMBOLaunchMars ArrivalMission lifetimeExtended Mission

WP2 MMCL0 ToolsOperationM dWP3 MDPCL1 Tools developed inPDCL2 Tools developed inPDCL3 Tools developed inPDCL4 Tools developed inPDCImplements Tools inMDPCRehearsalMDPC Developement: data base,IHMQuicklook toolsImprovement of L1-L4t lWP4 MSCModellingAssimilationClimatologyValidationScience WorkingForecast

WP5 MPOSDevelopment in parallel withMDPCInformation relative toMAMBOPublicR l

20122011201020092008200720062005200420032002

4.6 Cost and funding

4.6.1 Funding StatusThe Principal Investigator will be responsible for the funding arrangement for MAMBO. He will ensure(through Co-Is if necessary) that adequate funding is available at the required times for all aspects of theinstrument and its support.CNES will provide the funding for MAMBO Experiment in France, and the workforces (LMD and LERMA)will be supported by CNRS and MEN.For the USA, the NASA will provide the funding for the JPL part of MAMBO.The SSC will provide the funding for the AACS manufacturer.The Max Planck Institut fur Aeronomie and DARA will fund the German contribution.

In this document, funding asked from CNES will appears in red background, funding from other agencieswill appears in transparent background.




4.6.2 Hardware cost

4.6.2.1 Initial approach: Industrial managementPhase A studies have been performed by two industrial company. These companies provided a preliminaryestimation of the cost assuming an industrial management. Even assuming the provision of CFE by ourforeign partners, the resulting cost are high.For instance, ASTRIUM proposed a total developement cost of28.7 M€, Various options can be considered to slightly reduce this cost (table below) by a few M€ :

ASTRIUM (Option 1) 28,7 M€Action Cost reduction Remarks

CFE fully managed by LERMA 1,5 M€ As yet definedSTM replaced by a « dummy

part »1,2 M€ EM is more critical

No Bread Board for the BE andPDCU

0,5 M€ BB for receiver is TBD

Performance test managed byLERMA

0,5 M€

Antenna reduced from 30 cm to23 cm

Not estimated Defined in phase B

The spare model will bedelivered as « spare kit model »

Not estimated Defined in phase B

Total cost reduction 3,7 M€Final cost 25 M€

NB. The Spare model will be a « spare kit » model for increasing the commodity of replacement of spare atlast moment.

4.6.2.2 Second approach (proposed baseline): Industrial partnershipAlternatively to an industrial management, we propose to develop a strong partnership between LERMA andan Industrial Partner (TBD), but in which the LERMA /LMD will have prime responsibility on the project(schedule and delivery to Orbiter). The Industrial Partner will be responsible for the development (.PDEV,PVP, PIE ) This is described in the following diagram.




PI & Science teamF.Forget (LMD)

Program Management ProgramManagementSupport

Obs Paris-LERMALMD

MAMBO System

• CNES• Contract• Management• Conf PA• I/F Orbiter

Ground SegmentLERMA/LMD/Obs Bordeaux Prime responsability

LERMAPrime Contractor

Industry TBD

Instrument

Figure 4-7 MAMBO management organization

MAMBO will be managed by the Observatoire de Paris – LERMA has prime responsibility for the successof the project

The different responsibilities will be shared as described:

LERMA Prime contractorManagement LERMA is responsible on the schedule and delivery to Orbiter

The partners are both responsible on the : PDEV, PVP, PIEManagement • MAMBO Configuration

management with CNES support• RD

• Instrument configuration, ICD

Quality • Product assurance• Quality Plan

• Quality assurance• Industrial products• AIT

Engineering • Microwave architecture• Budgets• Instrument performance

• Design office• AMT• Environment & EMC• Budget analysis• Software

Procurement • Procurement for CFEs• Redaction of relatives IRD & IRC

• Industrial Part procurement:structure harness, PDCU, etc.

• Redaction of IRD & IRCAIT • AIT support

• To provide for facilities andsimulators

• AIT• EGSE




Considering this organization, the cost of the MAMBO Hardware will be decreased of about at the level of:MAMBO Hardware estimated cost: 15,5 M €

Another cost reduction can be done on the PDCU, with an SSC participation. (CFE), the cost reduction willbe TBD

4.6.2.3 Hardware Cost of the CFEs

Our baseline plan assume that major subsystems will be provided and funded by our foreign partners : USA,Germany, Sweden. In case of unfortunate failure of one of these partners, we have identified backup planswhich would not jeopardize MAMBO’s schedule and development:

CFE Baseline Backup Backup cost for CNESPLO + OL Provided by USA (JPL ) Industrial partnership

(TBD)2.2M€ *

IF Processor Provided by USA (JPL ) Industrial partnership(TBD)

1.5 M€ *

CTS Spectrometers Provided by Germany(MPAE)

IndustryOMNISYS (TBC)

1.2 M€

ACS Spectrometers Provided by Sweden(SSC)

IndustryOMNISYS (TBC)

1.2 M€

4.6.3 Cost of Facilities and Workforce during phases B and C/D:

4.6.3.1 Estimation of the cost for the Ground Segment (EGSE) development,PhaseB,C,D

We have initiated a dedicated study to design the future ground segment in France and estimate its costs, incollaboration with experts from CNES (Françoise Girod). Preliminary estimation indicate that a complete,state-of-the-art Ground Segment including mission command, data production, analysis and archiving wouldcost more than 2 M€ to CNES. However, in practice we plan to limit costs in order to remain well belowthis estimation. Cost reduction is made possible because of 1) the heritage from the ODIN ground segmentand the associated tools (e.g. inversion tool MOLIERE), 2) The use of the Planetary Atmosphere Data Center(planned to be developped separately at IPSL) to archive and distribute the data 3) The use of existing set ofglobal models for data analysis and assimilation at LMD (a project currently partly funded by CNES) 4) Theextensive collaboration with our foreign co-investigators. In addition, with regard to the command center,major saving could be achieved if CNES experts could contribute to the testing and qualification of theoperational telecommand software.




The workforce is estimated on the real disponnibility of the LMD/LERMA employees. Refer to fig 4.1 fordetails. The external support is globalised for science and technical staff, and evaluated on the baselineapproach (Main responsibility to LERMA, Industrial as prime contractor)

Estimated workforce, including external support during phase B and C/D2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Science team cost (LMD/LERLA/ Obs Bordeaux)

Includinf PI

2,9 4,9 4,9 4,9 4,3 1,0

Technical team team cost(LERMA) Including CdP

1,4 2,5 4,6 4,2 1,4 0,1

Total per year (Intermal) 4,3 7,4 9,5 9,1 5,7 1,1

External support (Scienceand Technical)

0,8 5,9 6,5 7,1 4,7 1,0

Estimated workforce Summary during phase B and C/D:Total

Science team cost (LMD/LERLA/ Obs Bordeaux)

Includinf PI

23,0 Funded

Technical team team cost(LERMA) Including CdP

14,1 Funded

Total(Intermal)

37,1 Funded

External support (Scienceand technical)

25,9 To be funded

Diagrams :Homme.an équipe de base LERMA/LMD

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

9,0

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Thése ou Post DocEquipe techniqueEquipe scientifique

Homme.an rajouté à l'équipe LERMA/LMD

0,0

1,0

2,0

3,0

4,0

5,0

6,0

7,0

8,0

1 2 3 4 5 6

CDDRégie externe

Cost of workforce during phase B and C/D:This cost is calculated on the consolidated cost ter hour of the CNRS employees A specific rate is applicatedto each poeple (internal and external) and a percentage is applied fir each quarte. The partial detail of costestimate per category and par year is given at the end of this volume.




2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007Science team cost (LMD /LERLA/ Obs

Bordeaux) Includinf PI336 000 E 496 000 E 496 000 E 496 000 E 467 200 E 114 400 E

Technical team team cost (LERMA)Including CdP

150 100 E 296 800 E 409 600 E 476 800 E 156 400 E 8 000 E

Total per year (Intermal) 486 100 E 792 800 E 905 600 E 972 800 E 623 600 E 122 400 E

External support (Scienceand technical)

81 600 E 448 000 E 504 000 E 472 000 E 223 400 E 38 400 E

Cost of workforce during phase B and C/D Sumary :Total

Science team cost (LMD /LERLA/ ObsBordeaux) Including PI

2 405 600 E Funded

Technical team team cost (LERMA)Including CdP

1 497 700 E Funded

Total (Intermal) 3 903 300 E Funded

External support (scienceand technical)

1 767 400 E To be funded

Cout structure LERMA/LMD

0 E

100 000 E

200 000 E

300 000 E

400 000 E

500 000 E

600 000 E

700 000 E

800 000 E

900 000 E

1 000 000 E

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

These ou Post DocEquipe techniqueEquipe scientifique

Cout rajouté

0 E

100 000 E

200 000 E

300 000 E

400 000 E

500 000 E

600 000 E

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Regie externeCDD

4.6.3.2 Facilities:This cost is to be evaluated in phase B. The approximated cost is 600 k€ (TBC).

4.6.3.3 Travel and Equipment:In the related configuration, the needed test equipment will be quite low, on the contrary the travel cost willbe higher than usual. This is due to the project configuration which implies a strong link betweenLERMA/LMD and industrial partners (Toulouse, Germany, Sweden, USA). The quasi permanent presenseof a LERMA representative at the industrial’s office and workshop is to be taken in account.The ground segment equipment has bee reduced, due to ODIN heritage.

Equipment cost during phase B and C/D:Equipment (Ph B, C/D) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total

Test of CFE 120 000 E 80 000 E 40 000 E 0 E 240 000 E




Mission Center (Hardware + Software) 300 000 E 300 000 E 600 000 EUpgrade of existing material 30 000 E 3 000 E 10 000 E 43 000 E

Total 150 000 E 383 000 E 350 000 E 0 E 883 000 E

Travel cost during phase B and C/D:Travel (Ph B, C/D) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Total

France 12 000 E 78 000 E 78 000 E 78 000 E 48 000 E 294 000 EEurope 9 600 E 45 000 E 45 000 E 45 000 E 12 000 E 156 600 E

USA 15 000 E 42 000 E 42 000 E 42 000 E 24 000 E 165 000 ETotal 36 600 E 165 000 E 165 000 E 165 000 E 84 000 E 615 600 E

4.6.3.4 Cost summary for phase B and C/D:This table summarise the cost estimated for the baseline structure MAMBO project.The AIT/AIV facilities has been estimated whith a 30% margin error. This cost will be re-evaluated inphase B.MAMBO Cost summary 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Total

Experiment Hardware 15 500 000 EAIT/AIV hardware 0 150000 383000 350000 0 883 000 EAIT/AIV facilities 800 000 ETravel 36 600 E 165 000 E 165 000 E 165 000 E 84 000 E 615 600 EExternal support 81 600 E 448 000 E 504 000 E 472 000 E 223 400 E 1 729 000 E

Total 19 527 600 E

The total cost for MAMBO In phase B and C/D has been evaluated to 19 527 600 €

4.6.4 Cost evaluation of Phase E (Mission Operation and Data Analysis).

This analysis is escentialy based on science need of workforce and mission.

4.6.4.1 Workforce during phase E:

This worforce is evaluated for a Primary (nominal) and Extended Operation Mission.

The estimation is based on a nominal science staff, majored by two external support.Primary and Extended Operation : cost estimate

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012PI 25600 25 600 E 25 600 E 25 600 E 25 600 E 25 600 E

CO I and other 76800 76 800 E 76 800 E 76 800 E 76 800 E 76 800 EDOC or Post Doc 21600 21 600 E 21 600 E 21 600 E 21 600 E 21 600 E

CDD 19200 19 200 E 19 200 E 19 200 E 19 200 E 19 200 E




To be funded by CNES:Sub total Mission Operation 57 600 ESub total extended mission 57 600 E

Total 115 200 E

4.6.4.2 Travel during phase E.Travel Mission Operation 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total

France 12 000 E 12 000 E 12 000 E 12 000 E 12 000 E 60 000 EEurope 9 600 E 9 600 E 9 600 E 9 600 E 9 600 E 48 000 E

USA 12 000 E 12 000 E 12 000 E 12 000 E 12 000 E 60 000 ETotal 33 600 E 33 600 E 33 600 E 33 600 E 33 600 E 168 000 E

To be funded by CNES:Sub total Mission 100 800 ESub total extended mission 235 200 E

Total 336 000 E

4.6.4.3 Phase E summary.Phase E Cost Summary for Primary Mission.

2007 2008 2009 TotalWorkforce 19 200 E 19 200 E 19 200 E

Travel 33 600 E 33 600 E 33 600 ETotal / an 52 800 E 52 800 E 52 800 E

Total pour la mission 158 400 E

4.6.5 Cost evaluation Summary.

4.6.5.1 Cost asked from CNES

This cost is evaluated wihout the Extended Operation Mission.

Phase B and C/D 19 527 600 €

Phase E 158 400 €

TOTAL 19 686 000 €

4.6.5.2 Cost funded by others institues.

This cost is evaluated to 6,1 (1)




(1) with an approximative $ rate at 0,9 €

4.6.6 Details of Cost Evaluation for Workforce.

Tables for cost evaluations are given hereby, taking in acount the permanent the (scientific andtechnical) staff:, and the external support. External support for ground segment and secretary areCDD.

2002 2003 2004ScienceTeam

TecnicalTeam

ExternalSupport

ScienceTeam

TecnicalTeam

ExternalSupport

ScienceTeam

TecnicalTeam

ExternalSupport

CO Is 172 800 E --- --- 230 400 E --- --- 230 400 E --- ---PI 48 000 E --- --- 64 000 E --- --- 64 000 E --- ---

Experiment Manager --- 56 000 E --- --- 89 600 E --- --- 144 000 E ---Project Controler --- --- 36 000 E --- --- 144 000 E --- --- 144 000 ESystem Engineer --- 50 400 E --- --- 67 200 E --- --- 38 400 E ---

Thesitif 28 800 E --- --- 38 400 E --- --- 38 400 E --- ---Product Assurance --- --- 0 E --- --- 72 000 E --- --- 72 000 E

Secrétarial/logistique --- 10 500 E --- --- 5 600 E --- --- 19 200 E ---Secrétarial/logistique --- --- 0 E --- --- 19 200 E --- --- 19 200 EIngénieur Thermique --- 10 800 E --- --- 14 400 E --- --- 32 000 E ---

BE --- --- 16 000 E --- --- 56 000 E --- --- 32 000 EMicrowave Architect --- --- 20 000 E --- --- 80 000 E --- --- 80 000 EMicrowave architect --- 0 E --- --- 0 E --- --- 32 000 E ---

Calibration/AIVresponsible

--- 22 400 E --- --- 56 000 E --- --- 64 000 E ---

Resp. SIS /EGSE --- 0 E --- --- 64 000 E --- --- 80 000 E ---




Technicien salleblanche

--- --- 0 E --- --- 0 E --- --- 80 000 E

Post doc datacomputer (EGSE)

0 E --- --- 48 000 E --- --- 48 000 E --- ---

Segment sol 86 400 E --- --- 115 200 E --- --- 115 200 E --- ---Segment sol --- --- 9 600 E --- --- 76 800 E --- --- 76 800 E

Total 336 000 E 150 100 E 81 600 E 496 000 E 296 800 E 448 000 E 496 000 E 409 600 E 504 000 E

2005 2006 2007ScienceTeam

TecnicalTeam

ExternalSupport

ScienceTeam

TecnicalTeam

ExternalSupport

ScienceTeam

TecnicalTeam

ExternalSupport

CO Is 230 400 E --- --- 230 400 E --- --- 57 600 E --- ---PI 64 000 E --- --- 64 000 E --- --- 16 000 E --- ---

Experiment Manager --- 112 000 E --- --- 29 400 E --- --- 0 E ---Project Controler --- --- 144 000 E --- --- 37 800 E --- --- 0 ESystem Engineer --- 89 600 E --- --- 22 400 E --- --- 0 E ---

Thesitif 38 400 E --- --- 9 600 E --- --- 0 E --- ---Product Assurance --- --- 72 000 E --- --- 7 200 E --- --- 0 E

Secrétarial/logistique --- 28 000 E --- --- 7 000 E --- --- 0 E ---Secrétarial/logistique --- --- 19 200 E --- --- 4 800 E --- --- 0 EIngénieur Thermique --- 7 200 E --- --- 0 E --- --- 0 E ---

BE --- --- 3 200 E --- --- 0 E --- --- 0 EMicrowave Architect --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---Microwave architect --- 48 000 E --- --- 25 600 E --- --- 0 E ---

Calibration/AIVresponsible

--- 64 000 E --- --- 40 000 E --- --- 8 000 E ---

Resp. SIS /EGSE --- 128 000 E --- --- 32 000 E --- --- 0 E ---Technicien salle

blanche--- --- 80 000 E --- --- 20 000 E --- --- 0 E

Post doc datacomputer

48 000 E --- --- 48 000 E --- --- 12 000 E --- ---

Segment sol 115 200 E --- --- 115 200 E --- --- 28 800 E --- ---Segment sol --- --- 153 600 E --- --- 153 600 E --- --- 38 400 E

Total 496 000 E 476 800 E 472 000 E 467 200 E 156 400 E 223 400 E 114 400 E 8 000 E 38 400 E

Glossary




ACS Attitude Control SystemAIT Assembly Integration & TestsATCT Attitude and Trajectory Control ThrustersBE MAMBO Back-EndCDR Critical Design ReviewCFE Customer Furnished EquipmentCNES Centre National d’Etudes SpatialesCoG Centre of GravityDOD Depth Of DischargeDSB Double Side BandDSGS Deep Space Ground StationsDSN Deep Space NetworkFE MAMBO Front-EndGSE Ground Support EquipmentHBV Heterojunction Barrier VaractorICD Interface Control DocumentIF Intermediate FrequencyIRD Interface Requirements DocumentJPL Jet Propulsion LaboratoryLGA Low Gain AntennaLNA Low Noise AmplifierLO Local OscillatorMCM Mars to Earth Cruise ManœuvreMHS Millimeter Humidity SounderMIRO Microwave Instrument for the Rosetta OrbiterMOI Mars Orbit InsertionNASA National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNEDT Noise Equivalent Detection TemperatureNF Noise Factor.OD Orbit DeterminationOP Observatoire de ParisOS Orbiting SamplePDCU Power Data Control UnitPDR Preliminary Design ReviewPLL Phased-Locked LoopPLO Phased-Locked OscillatorPOMS Probability Of Mission SuccessRAMS Reliability, Accessibility, Maintainability and SafetyRDV RendezvousRF Radio FrequencyRSC RDV Sample & CaptureSHP Sub-Harmonically PumpedSRR System Requirements ReviewSSB Single Side BandTBC To Be ConfirmedTBD To Be DefinedTT&C Tracking, Telemetry & CommandUSO Ultra Stable OscillatorUSO Ultra Stable OscillatorUVa University of Virginiawrt with respect to

Documents

Mars Atmosphere Microwave Brightness bserver · PDF file4.5.1 Experiment Master ... a basic approach to develop the Mars Atmosphere Microwave Brightness ... Undertakings in term of