-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
1/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
2/44
Determine if any additional information would berequired to make
a determination
2
Consider planning conditions if consent is granted 2
Developer has to supply additional informationand undergo the
same publicity and consultationas the original planning
application
4
The request for information is likely to cause adelay to the
project and additional costs to thedeveloper
4
Good explanation 4Total 20
Percentage
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
3/44
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
4/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
5/44
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
6/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
7/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
8/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
9/44
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
10/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
11/44
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
12/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
13/44
49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
14/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
15/44
58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
16/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
17/44
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
18/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
19/44
76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
20/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
21/44
85 86
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
22/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
23/44
Student marking codeQUESTION 1 1 2 3
Skill PointsGood structure (including introduction,
conclusionand coherent argument)
Up to 10
Evidence of reading beyond the course notes Up to 5
Arguments (can include other ideas)
Explanation of what climate change mitigationconsists of
(reducing greenhouse gas emissions andincreasing capacity of
natural stores and sinks)
5
Analysis of the positive impact of EIA on CCmitigation including
reducing GHG emissions ofindividual projects, designing projects to
reduceimpact on natural stores and sinks
10
Analysis of why EIA fails to secure CC mitigatione.g. lack of
climate change considerations withinEIA, inability to impact on
project type, justlocation and development consent
10
Analysis of why SEA can have a postive impact onCC mitigation
including consideration of earlierdecision-making stage for energy
policy,consideration of climate change on wider land use
policies such as forestry and agriculture
10
Analysis of why SEA can fail to have a positiveimpact including
plans and policies still restricted
by existing infrastructure e.g. national grid.
10
Total 60
QUESTION 2
Skill PointsGood structure (including introduction,
conclusionand coherent argument)
Up to 10
Evidence of reading beyond the course notes Up to 5Arguments
(can include other ideas)Explanation of what sustainable
development isand how EIA can help achieve it
9
Discussion of how developers could potentially put pressure on
consultants to reduce the significanceof indentified impacts
9
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
24/44
Discussion of other aspects of the clientrelationship and how it
can affect SD throughmanaging and writting the ES document
9
Discussion of the importance of effective public participation
for achieving sustainable development
9
Discussion of the reluctance of developers toencourage PP in the
scoping stage and the potentialimpact on achieving SD
objectives
9
Total 60
QUESTION 3
Skill PointsGood structure (including introduction,
conclusionand coherent argument)
Up to 10
Evidence of reading beyond the course notes Up to 5Arguments
(can include other ideas)
Discussion of what data collection and managementrequirements
there are in the context of EIA
5
Evaluation of the problems for impact predictione.g. requirement
for specific data for a location,lack of time to collect sufficient
data, inability tomanage data effectively and pass relevant
data
between subject areas
5
Evaluation of the problems for monitoring andauditing e.g. lack
of mandatory M&A, issues ofseparating increasing baseline from
project impact,
lack of transfer of M&A to other EIA projectimpact
prediction stages
5
Discussion of SD in the context of EIA 10Discussion of how EIA
influences decision-makingin terms of land-use decisions
10
Discussion of how EIA could be improved e.g. better information
management allowing for morecomplete impact prediction, better
informationabout the effectiveness of mitigation measures
fromM&A
10
Total 60
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
25/44
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
26/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
27/44
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
28/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
29/44
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
30/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
31/44
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
32/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
33/44
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
34/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
35/44
49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
36/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
37/44
58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
38/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
39/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
40/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
41/44
76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
42/44
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
43/44
85 86
-
8/10/2019 Marking Schedule Spring 2010
44/44
