50
Mapping A2K Advocacy: Towards a Coalition Against ACTA Consumers International A2K Network Global Meeting Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia April 22, 2010 Eddan Katz Electronic Frontier Fundation International Affairs Director 1 Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Consumers International A2K Network Global MeetingKuala Lumpur, MalaysiaApril 22, 2010

Citation preview

Page 1: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition

Against ACTAConsumers International A2K Network Global Meeting

Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaApril 22, 2010

Eddan KatzElectronic Frontier FundationInternational Affairs Director

1Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 2: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

History of IP & Trade

What is similar between designer handbags, hollywood movies, and genetically modified food?

IP alliance formed between agri-biotech, pharmaceutical industry, copyright alliance, and anti-counterfeiting.

Agenda to shift IP as the domain of international trade and set out harmonized global regime

Exploit anxieties about US trade deficit - claim about maximizing IP protection as key to maintaining hegemony in knowledge economy.

2Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 3: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Regime Shifting & Public Choice Theory

Small multi-national corporate alliance first drafting of IP regime wish list.

Frustrated by WIPO, alliance moves to WTO. TRIPs Agreement .

Bi-lateral trade negotiations with regions & countries.

TRIPs-Plus Agenda Harmonization &

3Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 4: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Information Theory

Information - basic facts, news, weather, government documents

Knowledge - education, artisan and technical skill

Knowledge-Embedded Goods - pharmaceuticals, agricultural seeds, computer software

Knowledge-Embedded Tools - internet infrastructure, technical standards, research databases

4Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 5: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Access to Knowledge

Creativity

Collaboration

Appropriation

Innovation

Competition

Integration

5Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 6: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Human Development & Fundamental Rights

Human Development

Essential Needs: Food security, Medicine, Education, Participation in Culture.

Social Justice

Distributive Equality. Fundamental Rights & Civil Liberties. Human Freedom.

Technology & Competition Policy

Dependent on Economic development & Cultural Context.

Knowledge Production

Sustainability. Education of Knowledge Workers. Democratization of Opportunity.

6Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 7: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Open Infrastructure

Peer Production - Non-market volunteerism

Modularity, Granularity, Integration

Modifiability - Customization & Localization

Training Knowledge Workers

Interoperability - removing barriers to entry

Improved Efficiency and Productivity

Safeguarding Human Freedom - decentralization of control

7Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 8: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Totality and Infinity in the Information Society

• Open vs. Closed

• Privacy vs. Security

• Entrepreneur vs. Incumbent

• Commons vs. Proprietary

• Data Protection vs. Data Retention

• Non-commercial vs. Monetized

• Information vs. Manufacturing

• Access vs. Control

• Competition vs. Monopoly

• Transparency vs. State secrets

• Human vs. Automation

• Circumvention vs. Lock

• Community vs. Corporate

• Communication vs. Censorship

• User Rights vs. Intellectual Property

• Anonymity vs. Identification

• Exceptions vs. Enforcement

• Disintermediation vs. Centralization

• Trust vs. Surveillance

• Neutrality vs. Discrimination

• Freedom vs. Fear

8Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 9: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Advocacy Networks

Consumer Protection

Human Rights

Privacy

IP & Commons

Environmentalism

9Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 10: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Transnational Memetics

Advocacy Issue Brokerage

Identifying Parallel & Complementary Organizations

Translating common values across specialized fields

Methods

Network of Networks

Mailing List cc: & fwd:

International Surveys

Co-signatories on Declarations

10Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 11: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Mapping A2K Advocacy

Regulations & Institutions

Production Models & Public Services

Technologies

11Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 12: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Categories of Knowledge

Food & Health

Education & Science

Culture & Media

Communications & Infrastructure

12Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 13: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Food & Health

Agriculture

Genetic Resources

Public Health

13Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 14: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Agriculture

Regulations: GMOs & Patents

Production: Open Research Tools

Technology: Terminator SeedsInstitutions: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) administered by the Conference of Parties (COP); the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA) at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); and the Union for the Protection of Plant Varieties (UPOV).

NGOs: Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN), ActionAid, the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL); Biological Innovation for an Open Society (BIOS) project based at the Center for the Application for Molecular Biology to International Agriculture (CAMBIA)

14Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 15: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Genetic Resources

Regulations: Disclosure of Origin

Production: Community Benefit-Sharing

Technology: Knowledge RegistriesInstitutions: CBD; CGRFA; UPOV; Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) at WIPO

NGOs: GRAIN; Action Aid; CIEL; BIOS; Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC) and Third World Network (TWN); Archaeological Markup Language of the Alexandria Archive Institute

15Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 16: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Public Health

Regulations: Access to Medicines

Production: Innovation Prize Funds

Technology: Neglected Diseases Research

Institutions: Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health (IGWG) at the WHO

NGOs: Medicines Sans Frontiéres (MSF); Knowledge Ecology International (KEI); IBM’s World Community Grid; Africa@Home’s Malariacontrol.net

16Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 17: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Education & Science

Scientific Research

Educational Materials

Libraries & Archives

17Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 18: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Scientific Research

Regulations: Database Rights

Production: Open Access Journals

Technology: Distributed ComputingInstitutions: European Directive on Database Rights

NGOs: Biomed Central; Public Library of Science (PLoS); National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL) in India

18Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 19: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Educational Materials

Regulations: Exceptions to and Limitations on Copyright

Production: Open Educational Resources

Technology: Low-cost laptops

19Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 20: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Libraries & Archives

Regulations: Digital Copyright

Production: Access to Information

Technology: Digital Archives

20Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 21: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Culture & Media

Cultural Production

Software Engineering

Censorship

21Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 22: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Culture

Regulations: Global Public Sphere

Production: Creative Commons

Technology: Peer Production

22Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 23: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Software

Regulations: Software Patents

Production: Free & Open Source

Technology: Digital Rights Management

23Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 24: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Censorship

Regulations: Global Internet Freedom

Production: Blogging & Social Networking

Technology: Anonymity Tools

24Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 25: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Communications & Infrastrucutre

Information & Communications Technologies (ICTs)

Network Infrastructure

Information

25Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 26: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

ICTs for Development

Universal Access

Spectrum Policy

Mobile Internet

26Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 27: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Network Infrastructure

Regulations: Internet Governance

Production: Open Standards

Technology: Internationalized Domain Names

27Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 28: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Information

Regulations: Freedom of Information Laws

Production: Network Neutrality

Technology: e-Government

28Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 29: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Mobilizing Against ACTA

Conflation of Piracy & Counterfeiting

Global Information Customs

Policing by Internet Intermediaries

Three Strikes (Graduated Response)

Confiscation of Generic Medicines

29Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 30: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Background History of ACTA

Anti-Counterfeiting Congress. Australia. 2004.

World Customs Organization (WCO) Standards Employed by Customs for Unified Rights Enforcement (SECURE) Initiative

US STOP! Initiative (Strategy on Targeting Organised Piracy) (Oct. 2004)

Bi-lateral and regional trade agreements

US-Korea & EU-Korea FTAs

EU-US Strategy on the Enforcement of IPR

30Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 31: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Pluri-lateral Agreement

Initial Negotiating Partner Countries: EU, US, Japan, Switzerland; Australia, Canada, Jordan, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Singapore, and United Arab Emirates.

Current Negotiating Partners: Australia, Canada, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, and United States

31Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 32: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Counterfeiting & Piracy

Purposely blurred & misleading

Perpetuating Incumbent Business Models concentrated in multi-national corporations

Consumer protection justification in Trademark vs. propertization of incentive regulations

European Parliament Common Resolution, voted 633-13.

32Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 33: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Global Information Customs

Ex-Officio Authority for Border Guards

New Internet Governance regime

Harmonization of maximilized legal rules

Privatization of oversight

Forcing changes in national laws

Laptop searches & privacy/due process

33Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 34: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Anti-Circumvention Regulations

Exportation of the DMCA

Legal Fortification of Technological Locks

Asymmetry of IP protection & exceptions

Automation of adjudication

Abuse of technological control

Anti-competitive leveraging of ancillary

34Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 35: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Intermediary Liability

Notice and Takedown systems

Due Process

Right to Appeal

Internet Disconnection

Defining Repeat Infringers

Filtering & Monitoring Obligations

35Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 36: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Criminalization of Copyright

Overemphasis on deterrence

Shift of enforcement from private parties to the state

Organized crime vs. alternative distribution models

Not knowingly engaged in infringement

Undermining Legitimacy of the Law

36Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 37: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Civil Enforcement

Expansion of definition of piracy

Beyond purposes of commercial advantage or personal profit

Mandatory Injunctions undermines Collective licensing solutions

Third party liability

Statutory Damages

37Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 38: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

International Relations

Pluri-lateralism - Coalition of the Willing

Bypassing Legislative Processes

Expansion of executive power

Trade Advisory Groups for foreign trade policy

Not about trade, but enforcement coordination

Faith-based policy-making

38Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 39: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Impact on Developing Countries

Ratcheting up international norms

Exclusion from norm-setting process

Applied in bi-lateral & regional negotiations

Interconnectivity of world trade - in-transit

Border seizures - generic medicines

Setting new standards for national implementation

39Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 40: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

TRIPs Article 13

Members shall confine limitations or exceptions to exclusive rights to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder.

40Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 41: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Exceptions & Limitations to Copyright

balance the interests of creators of intellectual works and the users’ rights to use protected works to further creative endeavour, learning and research.

link with fundamental human rights: equality, the right to education, freedom of expression and the right to access culture and share in scientific advancement.

legal instrument harmonizing minimum standards of exceptions and limitations

41Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 42: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Treaty for the Visually Impaired

make an accessible format of the work

exceptions extended to for-profit institutions

circumvention of technological measures

importation and exportation of works

database on availability of works

orphaned works

42Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 43: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Innovation in Digital Education

Bridging the physical and temporal gaps between students and centers of learning.

Provide new materials to the classroom that previously were unavailable or impractical.

Providing teachers and students new ways of learning information and interacting with educational objects

Transforming the way in which student work is evaluated, both in the classroom and outside.

43Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 44: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Taxonomy on Educational Exceptions & Limitations

Standards vs. Rules

Rule-based approach: bright-line divides between unauthorized acts of infringements and permitted uses

Standards-based approach: adopt a balancing test approach

Constraint Clauses

Actor

Purpose

Context

Action

44Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 45: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

1. Actor

limits who may take advantage of the exception

students, teachers, educational institutions

accreditation barriers and informal education

45Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 46: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

2. Purpose

control the breadth of exception without the type of content that it covers or actions that can be done with it

personal use

non-profit status

teaching

educational

examinations

46Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 47: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

3. Context

contexts within which exceptions can take place

geographical (i.e., classroom-setting)

non-geographic (i.e., educational institution)

47Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 48: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

4. Action

Quantity of copying

i.e., not more than 1% of work

Type of copy, examples:

reprographic copying; handwritten or typewritten copy

single, personal copies

up to 1,000 words

48Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 49: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

E&L AdvocacyInternational Law

Treaty for the Visually Impaired

Declarations

Free Culture Forum

Copyright for Creativity

Paris Accord

Projects

IP Watch List

Copyright Watch

49Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Page 50: Mapping A2K Advocacy:Towards a Coalition Against ACTA

Thank You

[email protected]

http://www.eff.org

50Wednesday, December 29, 2010