2
Determine, as soon as possible, launch sites for DS and DP, clinical versus commercial Clinical manufacturing facilities, used for launch, would need to meet the same quality/GMP expectations as commercial manufacturing facilities Gaining concurrence on comparability strategy/protocol for post-approval site changes in advance may lend confidence to the manufacturer’s ability to ensure sustained supply post-launch, particularly when expediting launch upon initial approval If using a contract manufacturing organization (CMO) for DS/DP, ensuring there is the capacity to allow rapid scale-up and to support commercial volumes will be critical Consider decoupling drug substance and drug product qualification lots (e.g., using clinical DS for DP qualification), when feasible to save time on the critical path to licensure Pivotal clinical studies could be performed with material from different scale and/or site than is intended for long term commercial production (e.g., studies originally expected to be phase II studies could be used as pivotal studies) Scaling-up phase III clinical lots to commercial scale for launch with bridging comparability study Clinical manufacturing facilities, used for launch, would need to meet the same quality/GMP expectations as commercial manufacturing facilities. This will necessitate prioritization on gaining concurrence on comparability strategy/protocol for post-approval site changes in advance and may lend confidence to the manufacturer’s ability to ensure sustained supply post-launch, particularly when expediting launch upon initial approval. Some activities that might be considered to speed development activities include the following: Use of Modelling to Facilitate Scale-up and Verification (small molecules and large molecules) Scale-up Verification using process modeling techniques (for example multivariate analysis (MVA) or chemical reaction kinetics) can positively impact CMC development, in terms of delivering enhanced process understanding and accelerated MANUFACTURING SCALE AND LAUNCH SITE CONSIDERATIONS scale-up and development. For drug substance and product processes designed at a small scale, verification that they scale-up as predicted to intermediate and commercial scale can be achieved more rapidly and with greater confidence through the application of scientific principles, e.g. process kinetics and process modeling techniques such as MVA. This obviates the need for additional experiments at intermediate and commercial scales. The approach is aligned and supports plans to commercialize from pilot-scale facilities. It provides enhanced process understanding more rapidly than traditional qualification/verification approaches, giving confidence in predictions of how processes will run at a larger scale. Continuous Manufacturing (small molecules and large molecules) Under an accelerated access scheme, it may not be feasible to perform pivotal clinical studies with the “to be marketed commercial process” thus necessitating further changes to the process that will be reflected by updating/ supplementing the initial Marketing application. The assessment of the changes and the supportive data to ensure the safety and efficacy of the changing process will be completed in a step-wise manner as would be done with other “non-accelerated” products (i.e. estimate product risk level, categorize the type of CMC change, evaluate the outcome of in-vitro/ex-vivo characterization and assess – if applicable - need/ type of in-vivo testing). In expedited schemes, where appropriate and justified, the use of prior knowledge/ platform knowledge will be leveraged for the comparability assessment. Three potential manufacturing changes are proposed below with proposed supportive data packages. This is not an exhaustive list. Cell line A change of cell line is common during the development of a biotech product to ensure a sufficient and robust commercial supply. However, it is considered a major change and is normally www.dsinpharmatics.com MANUFACTURING CONSIDERATIONS FOR BREAKTHROUGH DRUG DEVELOPMENT

MANUFACTURING SCALE AND LAUNCH SITE CONSIDERATIONS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MANUFACTURING SCALE AND LAUNCH SITE CONSIDERATIONS

Determine, as soon as possible, launch sites for DS andDP, clinical versus commercialClinical manufacturing facilities, used for launch, wouldneed to meet the same quality/GMP expectations ascommercial manufacturing facilitiesGaining concurrence on comparability strategy/protocolfor post-approval site changes in advance may lendconfidence to the manufacturer’s ability to ensuresustained supply post-launch, particularly whenexpediting launch upon initial approvalIf using a contract manufacturing organization (CMO)for DS/DP, ensuring there is the capacity to allow rapidscale-up and to support commercial volumes will becriticalConsider decoupling drug substance and drug productqualification lots (e.g., using clinical DS for DPqualification), when feasible to save time on the criticalpath to licensurePivotal clinical studies could be performed with materialfrom different scale and/or site than is intended for longterm commercial production (e.g., studies originallyexpected to be phase II studies could be used as pivotalstudies)Scaling-up phase III clinical lots to commercial scale forlaunch with bridging comparability study

Clinical manufacturing facilities, used for launch, wouldneed to meet the same quality/GMP expectations ascommercial manufacturing facilities. This will necessitateprioritization on gaining concurrence on comparabilitystrategy/protocol for post-approval site changes in advanceand may lend confidence to the manufacturer’s ability toensure sustained supply post-launch, particularly whenexpediting launch upon initial approval.

Some activities that might be considered to speeddevelopment activities include the following:

Use of Modelling to Facilitate Scale-up andVerification (small molecules and large molecules)Scale-up Verification using process modeling techniques (forexample multivariate analysis (MVA) or chemical reactionkinetics) can positively impact CMC development, in terms ofdelivering enhanced process understanding and accelerated

MANUFACTURING SCALE ANDLAUNCH SITE CONSIDERATIONS

scale-up and development. For drug substance andproduct processes designed at a small scale,verification that they scale-up as predicted tointermediate and commercial scale can be achievedmore rapidly and with greater confidence throughthe application of scientific principles, e.g. processkinetics and process modeling techniques such asMVA. This obviates the need for additionalexperiments at intermediate and commercial scales.The approach is aligned and supports plans tocommercialize from pilot-scale facilities. It providesenhanced process understanding more rapidly thantraditional qualification/verification approaches,giving confidence in predictions of how processes willrun at a larger scale.

Continuous Manufacturing (small molecules andlarge molecules)Under an accelerated access scheme, it may not befeasible to perform pivotal clinical studies with the“to be marketed commercial process” thusnecessitating further changes to the process that willbe reflected by updating/ supplementing the initialMarketing application. The assessment of the changesand the supportive data to ensure the safety andefficacy of the changing process will be completed ina step-wise manner as would be done with other“non-accelerated” products (i.e. estimate product risklevel, categorize the type of CMC change, evaluatethe outcome of in-vitro/ex-vivo characterization andassess – if applicable - need/ type of in-vivo testing). Inexpedited schemes, where appropriate and justified,the use of prior knowledge/ platform knowledge willbe leveraged for the comparability assessment. Threepotential manufacturing changes are proposed belowwith proposed supportive data packages. This is notan exhaustive list.

Cell lineA change of cell line is common during thedevelopment of a biotech product to ensure asufficient and robust commercial supply. However, itis considered a major change and is normally

www.dsinpharmatics.com

M A N U F A C T U R I N G C O N S I D E R A T I O N S F O R B R E A K T H R O U G H D R U G D E V E L O P M E N T

Page 2: MANUFACTURING SCALE AND LAUNCH SITE CONSIDERATIONS

implemented as early as possible during development(prior to pivotal studies). It is therefore proposed thatsuch cell line change may be performed during or postpivotal studies to enable early licensure under theaccelerated access scheme for cases where there isconvincing comparability evidence. In such a scenario, acomprehensive analytical comparability package wouldbe required, ensuring that each potentially impactedCQA has been assessed. It may also be pertinent toinclude the use of established animal models in PK/ PDstudies to support the analytical comparability whereappropriate.

Process scale-up / Change of Site of ManufactureA change of the process scale and/ or site ofmanufacture is usually considered a major CMC change.Within an accelerated clinical program, it may not bepossible to perform the technical transfer into thecommercial facilities and/ or manufacture at full scalefor pivotal clinical studies. We consider it acceptablethat manufacture for pivotal studies and initial launchcould be performed at a smaller scale or a clinicalmanufacturing site (provided both adhere to cGMP),with analytical comparability data being presented attheir earliest availability to support the switch to thecommercial manufacturing site post-launch. Processvalidation would then be provided post-approval basedon data created at the commercial site.

www.dsinpharmatics.com

DSI Solutions

C o n t a c t U sD S I , a P L G C o m p a n yP . O . B o x 5 3 2 , H a r l e y s v i l l e ,P e n n s y l v a n i a , 1 9 4 3 8 P : 8 5 5 - 8 0 5 - 8 4 0 2 s o l u t i o n s @ d s i n p h a r m a t i c s . c o m