8
The Value of Six Month Interval Imaging Following Benign Radiologic-Pathologic Concordant Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy Manjoros DT, Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV Comprehensive Breast Center, Bryn Mawr Hospital

Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

  • Upload
    nami

  • View
    31

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Value of Six Month Interval Imaging Following Benign Radiologic-Pathologic Concordant Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy. Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV. Comprehensive Breast Center, Bryn Mawr Hospital. Interval imaging. INTRODUCTION. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

The Value of Six Month Interval Imaging Following Benign

Radiologic-Pathologic Concordant Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy

Manjoros DT, Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

Comprehensive Breast Center, Bryn Mawr Hospital

Page 2: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous breast biopsy represents “best practice”¹

Correlation of histologic and imaging findings strongly endorsed¹

NCCN guidelines recommend follow-up imaging 6-12 month after benign concordant breast biopsy for a period of 1-2 years

Incidence of discordance low² and value of short-term interval imaging questionable

Interval imaging

¹Silverstein MJ, JACS, 2009

²Liberman L, Cancer, 2000

Page 3: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

METHODS

689 patients identified that underwent image-guided breast biopsy at Bryn Mawr Hospital in 2010

Biopsy type included stereotactic, ultrasound-guided or MRI-guided biopsy

All image-guided biopsies performed by radiologists who met criteria set forth by American College of Radiology Breast Center of Excellence

All charts were evaluated for documentation of concordance assessment

Interval imaging

Page 4: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

CONCORDANCE ASSESSMENTInterval imaging: Results

No radiology addendum 114/454

(25.1%)

Concordant 24/32

(75%)

Benign Patients N = 498

Surgical excision

44/498 (8.8%)

No excision 454/498

(91.2%)

Discordant 3/340 (0.9%)

Radiology addendum 340/454

(74.9%)

Discordant 8/32 (25%)

Radiology addendum 32/44

(72.7%)

Concordant 337/340

(99.1%)

No radiology addendum 12/44

(27.3%)

Page 5: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

OUTCOMES IN 11 DISCORDANT LESIONSInterval imaging: Results

Pathology N (%)

Benign 7 (63.6%)

High Risk 1 (9.1%)

Invasive Cancer 3 (27.3%)

•In total, 11/372 (3.0%) discordant minimally invasive biopsies

Page 6: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

CANCER INCIDENCE WITH INTERVAL IMAGING

169 (50.1%) of 337 benign concordant patients underwent interval imaging < 12 months

5(3%) with suspicious imaging– 3 at biopsy site, 2 away from biopsy site

1 cancer was identified, representing 0.6% (95% CI, 0 – 3.6%) of all benign concordant patients

No cancers were identified with interval imaging after stereotactic or ultrasound-guided biopsy

Interval imaging: Results

Page 7: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

COST ANALYSISDiagnostic imaging or procedure performed CostUnilateral mammogram $338 x 146 = $49,348

Breast ultrasound $1,104 x 43 = $47,472

Breast MRI $5,701 x 15 = $85,515

Stereotactic biopsy $2,447 x 0 = $0

Ultrasound guided biopsy $1,198 x 3 = $3,594

MRI biopsy $2,718 x 2 = $5,436

Pathologic analysis of core biopsy

$276 x 5 = $1,380

Total Cost $192,745

Interval imaging: Results

Page 8: Manjoros DT , Collett AE, Alberty-Oller JJ, Frazier TG, Barrio AV

CONCLUSION

Documentation of imaging-histologic correlation essential– Concordance assessment as a quality measure

Our data do not support the routine use of interval imaging following benign concordant breast biopsy– No interval imaging with specimen radiography– Selective use should be considered when

confirmation of lesion retrieval difficult

Interval imaging