Mandible No e

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    1/46

    FRACTURAS

    MANDIBULARES

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    2/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    3/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    4/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    5/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    6/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    7/46

    36%

    2%

    25%

    20%

    3%

    14%

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    8/46

    Mandibular Stresses

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    9/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    10/46

    Bite

    Force

    Muscle pull

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    11/46

    Tension band (monocortical), Champy, MMF or interdental wiring

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    12/46

    monocortical

    bicortical

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    13/46

    Tension band (monocortical), Champy, MMF or interdental wiring

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    14/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    15/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    16/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    17/46

    Anatomy Principles, BoneHealing, SurgicalApproaches and DCP

    Principles

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    18/46

    Objectives

    Review anatomy

    Discuss bone healing

    Explore principles of stable internalfixation

    Delineate load sharing vs load bearing

    osteosynthesis Review mandibular surgical approaches

    Discuss proper plating techniques

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    19/46

    Adult panorex

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    20/46

    Child Panorex

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    21/46

    Bone Healing

    Primary Secondary

    No callus Callus

    Direct bridging osteons

    Bony deposition

    Remodeling

    Fracture hematoma

    Progenitor deposition

    Differentiation

    Reduced risk for fibrous

    malunion

    Elevated risk for fibrous

    malunion

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    22/46

    Bone Healing

    Primary

    Adequate stability

    Secondary

    Inadequate stability

    No callus Callus

    Direct bridging osteons

    Bony deposition

    Remodeling

    Fracture hematoma

    Progenitor deposition

    Differentiation

    Reduced risk for fibrous

    malunion

    Elevated risk for fibrous

    malunion

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    23/46

    Bone Healing

    How do we assure stability of fracture line?

    1. Control of tension zone.

    2. Fixation of compression zone.

    3. Achieving appropriate occlusalrelationship.

    4. All of the above.

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    24/46

    Bone Healing

    How do we assure stability of fracture line?

    1. Control of tension zone.

    2. Fixation of compression zone.

    3. Achieving appropriate occlusalrelationship.

    4. All of the above.

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    25/46

    Control of mandibular stresses

    Zone of Tension

    Zone of Compression

    Load Sharing Fixation

    Load Bearing Fixation

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    26/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    27/46

    Load sharing vs Load bearingAbsolute bone-bone

    contact in fracture line

    Gaps in bone-bone

    interface

    Plate distributes

    mandibular forces to

    BONE

    Miniplates adequate

    Mandibular forces borne

    by PLATE

    Need strong plate

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    28/46

    Approaches

    MMF Arch bars Ivy loops Circumandibularwires

    Circumpiriform wires Ernst ligatures MMF screws

    ORIF condyle

    Endoscopic assist Open

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    29/46

    Approaches

    Intraoral/buccalsulcus incision

    Avoidance/preservation of mental nerve

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    30/46

    Approaches

    ORIF Risdon incision

    Extended risdon

    Transbuccal trocarwith intraoralincision

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    31/46

    Approaches

    MMF Arch bars

    Ivy loops

    ORIF Risdon incision

    Intraoral/buccalsulcus incision

    External fixator

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    32/46

    Case examples

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    33/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    34/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    35/46

    Naso-Orbital-Ethmoid Fracture

    Central midline impact

    Nasal fracture

    Medial orbital fracture of medial canthaltendon bearing area

    Ethmoid fracture

    Telecanthus

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    36/46

    NOE

    Type 1: Large attached fragment to MCTand stable central segment

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    37/46

    NOE

    Type 2: Large attached fragment to MCTand cominuted central segment

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    38/46

    NOE

    Type 3: Comminuted fragments withunattached MCT and comminuted centralsegment

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    39/46

    Fixation

    Type 1 and some type 2 : miniplatereduction of large fragment with attached

    MCT Type 3 or bilateral: Transnasal wiring

    (difficult)

    Anterior displacement of tendon and soft tissue

    Usually err on placing canthus too low

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    40/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    41/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    42/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    43/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    44/46

    Thank you

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    45/46

  • 7/27/2019 Mandible No e

    46/46

    Difficult Cases