Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    1/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 1

    Managing Interdependence: Social

    Responsibility and Ethics

    Chapter 2

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    2/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 2

    Chapter 2 - Overview

    The Social Responsibility of MNCs

    Ethics in Global Management

    Managing Interdependence

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    3/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 3

    MNC Stakeholders(Exhibit 2-2)

    Home Country

    Owners

    Customers

    Employees

    UnionsSuppliers

    Distributors

    Strategic allies

    Community

    Economy

    Government

    Society in General

    (global interdependence/

    standard of living)

    Global environment and ecology

    Sustainable resources

    Population standard of living

    Host Country

    Economy

    Employees

    Community

    Host governmentConsumers

    Strategic allies

    Suppliers

    Distributors

    MNC

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    4/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 4

    SA 8000s Proposed Global Standards

    Do not use child or forced labor

    Provide a safe working environment

    Respect workers rights to unionize

    Do not regularly require more than 48-hour work

    weeks

    Pay wages sufficient to meet workers basicneeds

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    5/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 5

    What is international business ethics?

    The term international business ethics refers to

    the business conduct or morals of MNCs in their

    relationships with individuals and entities.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    6/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 6

    The 2001 Corruption Perceptions Index( top 24 countries from Exhibit 2-4)

    Country Rank Country CPI Score

    1 Finland 9.9

    2 Denmark 9.5

    3 New Zealand 9.4

    4 Iceland 9.2

    Singapore 9.2

    6 Sweden 9.0

    7 Canada 8.9

    8 Netherlands 8.8

    9 Luxembourg 8.7

    10 Norway 8.611 Australia 8.5

    12 Switzerland 8.4

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    7/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 7

    The 2001 Corruption Perceptions Index

    (contd.)

    Country Rank Country CPI Score

    13 United Kingdom 8.3

    14 Hong Kong 7.9

    15 Austria 7.8

    16 Israel 7.6USA 7.6

    18 Chile 7.5

    Ireland 7.5

    20 Germany 7.4

    21 Japan 7.122 Spain 7.0

    23 France 6.7

    24 Belgium 6.6

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    8/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 8

    Limits of Ethical Standards for International

    Activities

    The laws of economically developed countries generally

    define the lowest common denominator of acceptable

    behavior for operations in those domestic markets. In an

    underdeveloped country or a developing country, it would

    be the actual degree of enforcementof the law that

    would, in practice, determine the lower limits of

    permissible behavior.

    Laczniak and Naor

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    9/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 9

    Questionable Payments

    Questionable paymentsare business payments

    that raise significant questions of appropriate

    moral behavior either in the host nation or inother nations. Such questions arise out of

    differences in laws, customs, and ethics in

    various countries, whether the payments in

    question are political payments, extortion, bribes,sales commissions, or grease money

    payments to expedite routine transactions.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    10/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 10

    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

    The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA),

    enacted in 1977, prohibits U.S. companies from

    making illegal payments or other gifts or politicalcontributions to foreign government officials for

    the purposes of influencing them in business

    transactions.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    11/21

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    12/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 12

    Ethical Behavior and Social Responsibility

    Guidelines Developed by MNCs

    Develop worldwide codes of ethics

    Consider ethical issues in strategy development

    Given major, unsolvable, ethical problems,consider withdrawal from the problem market

    Develop periodic ethical impact statements

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    13/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 13

    Making the Right Decision

    How is a manager operating abroad to know what is the

    right decision when faced with questionable or

    unfamiliar circumstances of doing business? Here is a

    suggested sequence: Consult the laws of both the home and the host countries

    Consult the International Codes of Conduct for MNEs (as shown in text

    Exhibit 2-2)

    Consult the companys code of ethics

    Consult your superiors

    Use your own moral code of ethics

    Follow your own conscience

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    14/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 14

    Managing Subsidiary-Host Country

    Interdependence

    When managing interdependence, internationalmanagers must go beyond general issues of socialresponsibility and deal with the specific concernsof the MNC subsidiary-host country relationship.

    Interdependence rather than independence, andcooperation rather than confrontation are at theheart of that accommodation the journey fromindependence to interdependence managed badlyleads to dependence, and that is an unacceptabledestination.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    15/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 15

    Criticisms of MNC Subsidiary Activities

    MNCs raise their needed capital locally,

    contributing to a rise in interest rates in host

    countries. The majority (sometimes even 100 percent) of

    the stock of most subsidiaries is owned by the

    parent company. Consequently, host-country

    people do not have much control over theoperations of corporations within their borders.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    16/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 16

    Criticisms of MNC Subsidiary Activities

    (contd.)

    MNCs usually reserve the key managerial and

    technical positions for expatriates. As a result,

    they do not contribute to the development ofhost-country personnel.

    MNCs do not adapt their technology to the

    conditions that exist in host countries.

    MNCs concentrate their R&D activities at home,

    restricting the transfer of modern technology and

    know-how to host countries.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    17/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 17

    Criticisms of MNC Subsidiary Activities

    (contd.)

    MNCs give rise to the demand for luxury goods in hostcountries at the expense of essential consumer goods.

    MNCs start their foreign operations by purchasing

    existing firms rather than developing new productivefacilities in host countries.

    MNCs dominate major industrial sectors, thuscontributing to inflation by stimulating demand for scarceresources and earning excessively high profits and fees.

    MNCs are not accountable to their host nations but onlyrespond to home-country governments; they are notconcerned with host-country plans for development.

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    18/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 18

    MNC Benefits and Costs to Host Countries(Exhibit 2-6)

    Capital Market Effects

    Benefits Broader access to outside

    capital

    Foreign-exchange earnings

    Import substitution effects

    allow governments to save

    foreign exchange for priority

    projects

    Risk sharing

    Costs Increased competition for

    local scarce capital

    Increased interest rates assupply of local capital

    decreases

    Capital service effects of

    balance of payments

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    19/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 19

    MNC Benefits and Costs to Host Countries(contd.)

    Technology and Production Effects

    Benefits Access to new technology and

    R&D developments

    Infrastructure developmentand support

    Export diversification

    Costs Technology is not always

    appropriate

    Plants are often for assemblyand can be dismantled

    Government infrastructure

    investment is higher than

    expected benefits

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    20/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 20

    MNC Benefits and Costs to Host Countries(contd.)

    Employment Effects

    Benefits Direct creation of new jobs

    Opportunities for indigenous

    management development Income multiplier effects on

    local community business

    Costs Limited skill development and

    creation

    Competition for scarce skills Low percentage of managerial

    jobs for local people

    Employment instability

    because of ability to move

    production operations freelyto other countries

  • 8/11/2019 Managing Interdependence: Social Responsibility and Ethics ch02

    21/21

    Prentice Hall 2003 Chapter 2 21

    Recommendations for MNCs Operating in

    Developing Countries(Suggested by De George)

    Do no international harm. This includes respect for the integrity of

    the ecosystem and consumer safety.

    Produce more good than harm for the host country.

    Contribute by their activity to the host countrys development. Respect the human rights of their employees.

    To the extent that local culture does not violate ethical norms, MNCs

    should respect the local culture and work with and not against it.

    Pay their fair share of taxes.

    Cooperate with the local government in developing and enforcing

    just background (infrastructure) institutions (i.e. laws, governmental

    regulations, unions, consumer groups) which serve as a means of

    social control.