59
CERTIFICATE This is to certify that Mr. Rishabh Lala, Mr. Aditya Jain, Mr. Prateek Singh Choudhary, and Mr. Vedant Mishra, students of Fourth year of University Dual Degree Integrated Post Graduation Programme have successfully completed their major project on ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE G+40 FRAME BASED R.C.C. STRUCTURE This report is a representation of their work under the supervision and guidance of Dr. Suresh Singh Kushwah during session 2014-2015. Dr. SURESH SINGH KUSHWAH Head of Department Department of Civil Engineering Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya,Bhopal June 2015

Major Project

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

"ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE G+40 FRAME BASED R.C.C. STRUCTURE"The project is designed for best configuration of the shear walls

Citation preview

Page 1: Major Project

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that Mr. Rishabh Lala, Mr. Aditya Jain, Mr. Prateek

Singh Choudhary, and Mr. Vedant Mishra, students of Fourth year of

University Dual Degree Integrated Post Graduation Programme have

successfully completed their major project on

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF HIGH RISE G+40 FRAME BASED

R.C.C. STRUCTURE

This report is a representation of their work under the supervision and guidance

of Dr. Suresh Singh Kushwah during session 2014-2015.

Dr. SURESH SINGH KUSHWAH

Head of Department

Department of Civil Engineering

Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya,Bhopal

June 2015

Page 2: Major Project

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Success is epitome of hard work, cogency for fulfilling the mission,

indefatigable perseverance and most of all encouraging guidance and

steering.

It gives me immense pleasure to express my gratitude to Dr. Suresh Singh

Kushwah, Head of Department, his apt mentoring and guidance as well as

support throughout my project kept me on the right track. I also express

my gratitude to all the faculty members of Civil Engineering Department

for their esteemed guidance and able supervision during the course of

project. Their constant encouragement and co-operation made this project

a success.

Lastly, I would like to thank my parents for being the source of motivation

and colleagues who have helped me with their abilities in the completion

of this project.

Page 3: Major Project

1 | P a g e

ABSTRACT

Besides, food and clothing, shelter is a basic human need. India has been

successful in meeting the food and clothing requirements of its vast population;

however the problem of providing shelter of all is defying solutions. Thus most

current Government policy supports the principle of building in towns and cities at

higher commercial densities. There are many different factors to take into account

when high density is to be delivered in the form of tall buildings.

Hence in order to overcome the problem of higher density requirement,

construction process should be quick, tall and effective to accommodate huge

population in a given area. So we have chosen this topic of “ANALYSIS AND

DESIGN OF HIGH RISE (G+40) R.C.C. STRUCTURE”. Such structures will

definitely provide high density in the form of tall buildings which is necessary to meet

the future needs.

The quickness in R.C.C. construction process and the strength parameters and

effectiveness to bare horizontal loads is very high due to presence of shear walls.

Shear walls are generally used in high earth quake prone areas, as they are highly

efficient in taking the horizontal loads. Not only the earthquake loads but also winds

loads which are quite high in some zones can be taken by these shear walls efficiently

and effectively.

The buildings constructed during the past couple of decades did not take into

account the effect of earthquake and wind loads very effectively. But the effects of

these horizontals loads can prove to be disastrous and thus our project has taken

considerable effect of these loads as specified by the Indian Standard Codes. Moment,

shear and mode analysis of all load combinations as specified by the IS codes have

been done using Computer softwares like AutoCAD, ETABS.

As said by Benjamin Franklin “An investment in knowledge pays the best

interest”. We would like to invest our knowledge to whatever extent we can and

design the building most efficiently.

Page 4: Major Project

2 | P a g e

Table of Contents

1.INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1

1.1Definition ...................................................................................................................... 5

1.2Scope of Work ............................................................................................................... 6

1.3Objective ....................................................................................................................... 6

1.4Methodology................................................................................................................. 7

3.Literature review ................................................................................................................... 4

2.1Indian Standards ........................................................................................................... 8

2.2 Review Of Literature .................................................................................................... 9

3.Earthquake ........................................................................................................................... 10

3.1Earthqake Engineering ............................................................................................... 10

3.2Earthquakes in India ................................................................................................... 12

3.3 Earthquake Resistant Buildings ......................................................................................

4.Design Consideration ........................................................................................... 14

4. 1Desing Consideration ................................................................................................. 14

4.2 Orientation of Columns.............................................................................................. 14

4.3 Loading ....................................................................................................................... 15

4.4Materials ..................................................................................................................... 16

4.5Earthquake Resistant designs ..................................................................................... 16

4.6 Safety ......................................................................................................................... 19

4.7Servicibility .................................................................................................................. 19

4.8 Economy..................................................................................................................... 19

5. Architectural Plan In AUtoCAD

5.1 Plan of Apartments .................................................................................................... 20

6. Modeling in ETABS

6.1 Input Architectural Plan ............................................................................................. 23

6.2 Defining Section Properties ....................................................................................... 25

6.3 Assigning Property To Various Elements ................................................................... 29

6.4Defining and Assigning Loads ..................................................................................... 32

Page 5: Major Project

3 | P a g e

6.5 Analyzing the structural Behavior .............................................................................. 34

7. Detailed Design of Structure

7.1 Design of Footings ...................................................................................................... 39

7.2 Beams ......................................................................................................................... 39

7.3 Columns ..................................................................................................................... 40

7.4labs .............................................................................................................................. 41

7.5Walls............................................................................................................................ 41

7.6Shear Walls ................................................................................................................. 42

8. Scope for Future Work ........................................................................................................ 56

9. References ........................................................................................................................... 57

List of figures

Figure 3.2.1 Collapse of Intermediate storey of a six storeyed R.C.C. Frame str(Bhuj) ... 11

Figure 3.2.2Damage of RCC Structure due to soft storey at ground floor....................... 11

Figure 3.3.1 Typical Earthquake Resistant Design of Multi Storey .................................. 12

Figure 4.1.1. a. Is preferred over B because of symmetry in Structure ........................... 14

Figure 4.2.1 Orientation of columns is Better in B than in A in given plan ...................... 15

Figure 4.3.1. Line loading on the beams of super structure ........................................... 15

Figure 5 .1.1 AutoCAD Plan of the apartments ................................................................ 21

Figure 5. 1.2Grid lines and column orientation ............................................................... 22

Figure 6.. 1.1 Import AutoCAD File to ETABS ................................................................... 24

Figure 6.1 .2 Final Plan of Structure in ETABS .................................................................. 25

Figure 6.2.1Defining Section Properties .......................................................................... 26

Figure 6.2.2 Defining Beam and Column Properties ........................................................ 27

Figure 6.2.3. Defining Slab Properties ............................................................................. 27

Figure 6.2.4 Defining the wall section Properties ............................................................ 28

Figure 6.3.1 Assigning Properties..................................................................................... 29

Figure 6.3.2.Assigning the slab section properties .......................................................... 30

Figure 6.3.3.Rendered 3D View of Structure ................................................................... 32

Figure 6.4.1. Defining Load Patterns ................................................................................ 33

Figure 6.4.2 Various Load Combination ........................................................................... 34

Page 6: Major Project

4 | P a g e

Figure 6.4.3 The Applied Live Loads ................................................................................. 34

Figure 6.4.1Defying Load Patterns ................................................................................... 32

Figure 6.4.2 Various Load Combinations ......................................................................... 33

Figure 6.4.3 Applied Live Loads ....................................................................................... 33

Figure 6.5.1 Member force Diagram(Moment 2 -2) ....................................................... 34

Figure 6.5.2 Member force Diagram(Shear 3-3) ............................................................. 35

Figure 6.5.3.Member Force Diagram(Moment 3-3) ........................................................ 35

Figure 6.5.4 Shell Force Diagram(Moment 1-1) ............................................................... 36

Figure 6.5. 5 Deformed Shape(Load Combination IS10) .................................................. 36

Figure 6.5.6 Deformed Shape(Load Combination IS8)..................................................... 37

Figure 6.5.7. Deformed Shape(Load Combination IS I) .................................................... 37

Figure 6.5.3. Member Force Diagram(Moment 3-3) ....................................................... 38

Figure 7.3.1.Special Confining Reinforcement at the joint of Two Floors ....................... 40

Figure 7.3.2. Normal Shear Reinforcement in Columns .................................................. 40

Figure 7.5.1 Location of Shear Walls................................................................................ 42

Figure 7.5.2Pile Cap Details ............................................................................................. 45

Figure 7.5.3 Pile Details .................................................................................................... 46

Figure 7.5.4 Pile Details .................................................................................................... 47

Figure 7.5.5 Orientation of Floor Columns ...................................................................... 48

Figure 7.5.6 Columns Schedule and Cross-Sections ........................................................ 49

Figure 7.5.7 Plinth BeamPlan ........................................................................................... 50

Figure 7.5.8 Beam Plan .................................................................................................... 51

Figure 7.5.9 Beam Schedule and Reinforcement Details ................................................. 52

Figure 7.5.10 Anchorage Details ...................................................................................... 53

Figure 7.5.12 Slab Details ................................................................................................. 54

Figure 7.5.13 Overall Schedule ........................................................................................ 55

Page 7: Major Project

5 | P a g e

Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Definition:

Reinforced Cement Concrete (R.C.C.) structure is a frame based structure in

which the concrete elements like columns, beams and slabs are reinforced with steel

bars to provide the necessary tensile strength to the structure and thus improve the

strength of the structure on the whole. An RCC framed structure is basically an

assembly of slabs, beams, columns and foundation inter-connected to each other as a

unit. The load transfer in such a structure takes place from the slabs to the beams,

from the beams to the columns and then to the lower columns and finally to the

foundation which in turn transfers it to the soil. The floor area of a R.C.C framed

structure building is 10 to 12 percent more than that of a load bearing walled building.

Hence, there is actual economy in case of RCC framed structures especially where the

cost of land is very high. Also in case of RCC framed structures, the inside planning

of rooms, bathrooms, W.Cs etc. can be altered by changing the position of partition

walls. Thus, there is greater flexibility in planning. Also Speed of construction for

RCC framed structures is more rapid.

Shear walls are vertical elements of the horizontal force resisting system.

Shear walls are constructed to counter the effects of lateral load acting on a structure.

In residential construction, shear walls are straight external walls that typically form a

box which provides all of the lateral support for the building. When shear walls are

designed and constructed properly, and they will have the strength and stiffness to

resist the horizontal forces. In building construction, a rigid vertical diaphragm

capable of transferring lateral forces from exterior walls, floors, and roofs to the

ground foundation in a direction parallel to their planes. Examples are the reinforced-

concrete wall or vertical truss. Lateral forces caused by wind, earthquake, and uneven

settlement loads, in addition to the weight of structure and occupants; create powerful

twisting (torsion) forces. These forces can literally tear (shear) a building apart.

Reinforcing a frame by attaching or placing a rigid wall inside it maintains the shape

of the frame and prevents rotation at the joints. Shear walls are especially important in

high-rise buildings subjected to lateral wind and seismic forces. In the last two

Page 8: Major Project

6 | P a g e

decades, shear walls became an important part of mid and high-rise residential

buildings. As part of an earthquake resistant building design, these walls are placed in

building plans reducing lateral displacements under earthquake loads. So shear-wall

frame structures are obtained.

1.2 Scope of Work:

The aim of G+ 40 structure is to understand the need of high rise structures to

support the living of large population in a given area. This includes the construction

of a tall structure stabilized against the effects of strong horizontal wind loading and

seismic loading.

The scope is to analyse the structure and then design the structure according to

the deflection, moment and shear of various elements in the structure. For this the

structure is first modelled in ETABS and then analysed based on the investigation of

strength, safety, economy and serviceability. The designing is then done based on the

various Indian Standard Design codes.

1.3 Objective:

The high rise buildings must not only be designed to resist gravity / vertical

loads (due to its self-weight and other living / moving loads), but also designed for

lateral loads of earthquakes / wind. The walls are structurally integrated with roofs /

floors (diaphragms) and other lateral walls running across at right angles, thereby

giving the three dimensional stability for the building structures.

The key objective of shear wall is to build a safe, tall, aesthetic building.

Walls have to resist the uplift forces caused by the pull of the wind. Walls have to

resist the shear forces that try to push the walls over. Walls have to resist the lateral

force of the wind that tries to push the walls in and pull them away from the

building.

Page 9: Major Project

7 | P a g e

1.4 Methodology:

Step1: The first step was to make an architectural plan for the G+40 structure.

This was done using the software AutoCAD. The plan was of a residential apartment

with six individual flats at each level. The plan that I adopted is one of my internship

projects at Heaven’s Design Bhopal – Project Vishal Heights – Airport Bypass Road,

Bhopal. Columns were marked in 3-D AutoCAD file which was ready for import.

Step2: Location conditions were assumed as with open land so as to maximize

wind effects. Although, Wind Tunnel test have been ignored. Soil condition assumed

is Black soil necessitating the requirement of Pile Foundation. Frame based RCC

Structure with shear walls is decided as the structure type.

Step3: Then the DXF file from AutoCAD was imported to the ETABS 2015

so that the structure could be modelled further. First step in the modelling was

orientation and position of columns required. Various dimensions of columns and

beams were deliberated then chosen with different concrete mix grades so that the

moment and shear load can be tackled and a safe construction is done. The column

orientation and sizes was the most brainstorming affair, keeping in mind stability,

ductility, shear centre, loading positions, torsional stability and mass of the structure.

Step4: Model of the first floor was replicated for 40 storeys after applying

loading. Sectional properties were assigned based on understanding and experience.

Step5: Structure was analysed and mode, deflection, drift checks were

performed.

Step6: Structure was designed based on the analysis output in terms of shear

force and bending moments based on respective code-provisions, using manual

calculations.

Page 10: Major Project

8 | P a g e

Chapter 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Indian Standards:

2.1.1 IS 13920:1993

Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to

Seismic Forces – Code of Practice, IS: 4326-1993, "Earthquake Resistant

Design and Construction of Buildings - Code of Practice (Second Revision)",

IS: 456 -2000 “Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete”, IS: 2911-

1980, Part III “CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS PART III UNDER-REAMED

PILES”, various sections and clauses were studied for analysis and design of

the model. Code of Practice for Structural Safety of Buildings: Masonry, IS-

NBC-2005: National Building Code of India, was studied for making the

architectural plan of the building, IS: 875-1987Design loads ( other than

earthquake ) for buildings and structures, Part2 Imposed Loads, IS: 875-1987

Design loads ( other than earthquake ) for buildings and structures ,Part 3

Wind Loads, were studied to make proper load combinations of wind and

earthquake forces.

2.1.2 IS 456:2000

For proper installation of reinforcements in Beam-Column joints as per

this code was referred because the structural dimensioning of beams and

columns was inadequate in terms of provisions in IS: 13920-1993. Also the

width depth ratio for slabs and other deigning details were done on the basis

of IS 456:2000 “Plain and Reinforced Concrete- Code of Practice”

2.1.3 SP 34

For the detailing of structural members like beams, columns and slabs

along with the spacing of bars and stirrups was studied from SP34. The

reinforcement detailing of secondary beams and primary beams along with

beam column joints were studied from SP34.

Page 11: Major Project

9 | P a g e

2.1.4 IS 2911 pile

Pile design formals and various code provisions like clause 5.2.3.1, were

used. The detailing and the pile cap design was studied from the same.

2.2 Review of Literature:

U.H. Varyani described about shear walled buildings under horizontal loads.

Considering in his design, “Reinforced concrete framed buildings are adequate for

resisting both the vertical and the horizontal loads acting on shear walls of a

building”. In his 2nd

edition in 2002 of, “Design of structures” he gave rigidity of

shear wall, torsional rigidity and shear canter of a building in a detailed description.

V. Chandwani, V. Agrawal, N.K. Gupta in the journal IJERA mentioned

“Role of Conceptual Design in High Rise Buildings”. Their paper elaborates the

necessity of conceptual design and differentiating the load resisting system of exterior

and interior structures. They pin pointed Earthquake resistant design and effect of

wind loading as governing structural features.

“IITK-BMTPC Earthquake Tips:: Learning Seismic Design and

Construction“, all 24 tips were studied very carefully and hence their suggestions and

conclusions were applied.

Page 12: Major Project

10 | P a g e

Chapter 3

EARTHQUAKE

3.1 Earthquake Engineering

An earthquake (also known as a quake, tremor or temblor) is the perceptible

shaking of the surface of the Earth, which can be violent enough to destroy major

buildings and kill thousands of people. Earthquake engineering is one of the more

recent additions to the civil engineering specialties. While all structures have a need to

be designed to be earthquake resistant, it is the proliferation of high-rise buildings

which has sparked the interest in developing earthquake survivability technology.

Seismic events create a number of separate, but interrelated problems for

buildings and other structures. The earthquake itself can move both laterally and

vertically, providing forces to which the structure is not normally subject.

Additionally, earthquakes can cause soil liquefaction, where the soil under a

building flows out from under the foundation, eliminating the structural support that

the building relies on. Other events, such as landslides can be caused by earthquakes,

adding additional hazards.

Earthquake engineering consists of two basic parts: the first is understanding

the effects of earthquakes on buildings and other structures. The second is designing

structures which can withstand the forces brought to bear during an earthquake and

remain safe and serviceable.

3.2 Earthquakes in India

The Indian subcontinent has a history of earthquakes. The reason for the high

frequency and intensity of earthquakes is the Indian plate driving into Asia at a rate of

approximately 49 mm/year. Various places that have received the harshness of

earthquake in India include Latur, Shillong, Bhuj, Andaman, Kashmir etc.

Talking of the Gujrat Earthquake in 2001, a large number of reinforced

concrete multi-storeyed frame buildings were heavily damaged and many of them

collapsed completely in Bhuj in the towns of Kachchh District (viz., Bhuj, Bhachao,

Anjar, Gandhidham and Rapar) and other district towns including Surat and

Ahmedabad. In Ahmedabad alone situated at more than 250 kilometres away from the

Epicentre of the earthquake, 69 buildings collapsed killing about 700 persons.

Page 13: Major Project

11 | P a g e

Fig. 3.2.1: Collapse of Intermediate storey of a six storeyed R.C.C. Frame str(Bhuj)

Fig. 3.2.2: Damage f RC structure due to soft-story at the ground floor

Page 14: Major Project

12 | P a g e

3.3 Earthquake Resistant Buildings

The seismic safety of a multi-storeyed reinforced concrete building will

depend upon the initial architectural and structural configuration of the total building,

the quality of the Structural analysis, design and reinforcement detailing of the

building frame to achieve stability of elements and their ductile performance under

severe seismic lading. Proper quality of construction and stability of the infill walls

and partitions are additional safety requirements of the structure as a whole. Any

weakness left in the structure, whether in design or in construction will be fully

revealed during the postulated maximum considered earthquake for the seismic zone

in the earthquake code IS: 1893.

Fig. 3.3.1: Typical Earthquake Resistant design of a multi storey

The main structural elements and their connection shall be designed to have a

ductile failure. This will enable the structure to absorb energy during earthquakes to

avoid sudden collapse of the structure.

Other key points that must be taken under consideration include:

Earthquake resistant design is not earthquake proof design.

Sufficient lateral stiffness is required to ensure that building does not get

damaged under minor shaking.

Page 15: Major Project

13 | P a g e

The frame should be consistent under major earthquakes also, although it is

allowed to get deformed or have more deflections.

Structural designers have the duty to consider that the structure would be

subjected to an earthquake at least once during the life time of the structure for

which it is designed.

Four virtues of the Earthquake resistant structure are :

a. Good seismic configuration – i.e. Least complexities

b. Lateral stiffness

c. Lateral Strength

d. Good overall ductility

Page 16: Major Project

14 | P a g e

Chapter 4

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

4.1 Structural Configuration

The structural configuration should be regular and symmetrical and as far

as rectangular in nature. The structural centre of rigidity of the structure should

coincide with the centre of mass of the structure; otherwise it would result in the

torsional modes of the structure.

(a) (b)

Fig. 4.1.1: (a) is preferred over (b) because of symmetry in the structure

4.2 Orientation of Columns

The orientation of the columns should be so adjusted that it is symmetrical

their configuration is symmetrical in nature. Again we have to make sure that there

are no torsional modes arising due to the irregular structural configuration. Another

philosophy that is considered during the assignment of the column is that the columns

are oriented in the longer direction. Also care is taken corner and middle columns

could bear the biaxial moments properly

Page 17: Major Project

15 | P a g e

(a) (b)

Fig. 4.2.1: Orientation of Columns is better in (b) than in (a) in a given plan

4.3 Loading

The various load that need to be considered while deigning a structure

includes the self-weight (viz. the dead weight of the super structure); live load (viz.

the load that the structure will undertake due to the occupants); wall load (viz. the

load of the brick walls or claddings used); wind load (viz. the horizontal load exerted

by wind forces) and earthquake load.

Fig. 4.3.1: Line loading on the beams of super structure

Page 18: Major Project

16 | P a g e

4.4 Materials

The various material specification and the quantities to be used for

optimum and safe design of structures are as follows:

a. Cement: Ordinary portland cement conforming to IS 269 - 1976 shall

be used along with fly ash after carrying out the design mix from

approved consultant.

b. Reinforcement: Cold twisted high yield strength deformed bars grade

Fe 415 conforming to IS: 1786-1985, or preferably TMT bars of

standard manufacturer e.g. TATA Steel, SAIL or equivalent shall be

used.

c. The following grades of concrete mix may be adopted or as required

for safe design:

For RCC columns in lowest few storeys : M35 – M50

For RCC columns in the middle few storeys : M30 – M40

For RCC columns in the top few storeys : M25 – M35

For beams, slabs, staircase etc. : M25

For raft foundation : M25 or more

d. Max. Water cement Ratio : 0.45

e. Minimum cement content : 300 kg/m3 of concrete.

f. Admixtures of approved brand may be used as per mix design

4.5 Earthquake Resistant Design

There are numerous points to be kept in mind while deigning of earthquake

resistant buildings. Some of the important key features include:

No member should be smaller than 200mm

The width to depth ratio for no member should be smaller than 0.3

The depth of member should not be more than 1/4 of the clear span

The spacing of stirrups over the length 2d should not be less then

the following :

100mm

8 times the diameter of the smallest bar used at the junction

d/4

Page 19: Major Project

17 | P a g e

Design shear force shall be the maximum of the shear force of the

member as per analysis.

The first hoop shall not be placed at a distance more than 50mm

Elsewhere the stirrups can have spacing more than d/2

The shortest dimension for members(Beams) should not be less then

300 mm for beams longer then 5m or 4 metres of unsupported

length

Not more than 50% of the bars shall be spliced(Overlapped) at one

section.

Lap splices should be provided only at the central half of the

member

Not more than 150mm spacing should be provided in stirrups in

case of splices.

The spacing of the stirrups shall be not more than .5 x The least

lateral dimension, in case of the column.

Special Confining reinforcement is provided usually for the

discontinuous walls on both sides of the column, where there is no

wall on both the sides, this is due to the fact that the column starts

behaving as short column in case of earthquake and undergoes

brittle failure and hence that part of column needs to be specially

confined.

The column with special confining reinforcement should be

provided in the column when it is terminated in the footing and it

should enter at least 300mm into the footing.

When the point of contra flexure is not within the middle half of the

member (column), Special Confining Reinforcement should be

provided over the complete column.

The spacing of the SCR shall not be more than 100mm and not less

than 75 mm and not less than 1/4 of the minimum member

dimension.

Use minimum 8mm diameter for SPR

8 mm diameter at spacing 70 mm is generally used

Page 20: Major Project

18 | P a g e

At the end of the column, from which the beams span in all the

directions and all beams are having width at least 0.75 x width of

the respective column face, the SPR can be reduced by 50% , with

spacing not exceeding 150mm.

Lift cores should not be provided at one end of the building as this

may lead to high torsional shear on the columns.

The orientation should be done primarily on the basis of

maintaining the stiffness in the foundation, so that the group piles

do not allow the soil to be weakened. It will act like the roots of the

plants. Hence preventing the movement of the soil in the opposite

directions.

Highly flexible soil makes the footings as good as fixed and rocky

soil makes them fixed. The flexibility is generally seen in case of

isolated footings.

This flexibility creates more chances of lateral sway in the lower

storeys than in the higher storeys. The overall response of the

building turns into shear type.

We design buildings for shear type response, which means the

columns and beams fail in shear.

Hinged column base will lead to the higher mode shape.

No two periods of natural translation should be within 15% of the

natural period of the largest translation.

Buildings consisting of the open ground floors(Stilt Storey), is

problematic, as due to the increased(4 to times) stiffness of the

upper storey, the buildings may fail due to the soft ground storey,

the simple way we can avoid this is by making brick infill at all four

corners, also the ground columns(soft storey columns) should be

designed for 2.5 times shear and moments

Page 21: Major Project

19 | P a g e

4.6 Safety

Safety consideration is perhaps the most important factor that must be kept

in mind while design of any structure. This safety refers to the safety of the people

present the building as well as their belongings. This is achieved when the designed

structure is under the deflection limits and does not have any storey drifts. Due

consideration must be made for wind loading and earthquake impact.

4.7 Serviceability

A serviceability limit defines the performance criterion for serviceability

and corresponds to conditions beyond which specified service requirements resulting

from the planned use are no longer met. a structure fails its serviceability if the criteria

of the serviceability limit state are not met during the specified service life and with

the required reliability. Hence, the serviceability limit state identifies a civil

engineering structure which fails to meet technical requirements for use even though

it may be strong enough to remain standing. A structure that fails serviceability has

exceeded a defined limit for properties like excessive deflection, vibration of local

deformation.

4.8 Economy

Economy is also an important factor that must be kept in mind while

designing any structure. A structure which is safe and serviceable but not economic

will not be preferred by people over structures which are safe, economic and

serviceable. Thus while designing of any structure the economics factor must also be

taken into consideration.

Page 22: Major Project

20 | P a g e

Chapter 5

ARCHITECTURAL PLAN IN AUTOCAD

5.1 Plan of Apartments

The architectural plan in AutoCAD consists of the plan layout of the

residential apartments highlighting the dimensions of various rooms. It also shows the

Provision of windows, doors, lift wells etc. Studying this plan carefully, one can

decide thw orientation of columns that must be provided so as to attain stability.

Page 23: Major Project

21 | P a g e

Fig. 5.1.1 AutoCAD plan of the apartments

Page 24: Major Project

22 | P a g e

Fig. 5.1.2: Grid lines and column orientation

Page 25: Major Project

23 | P a g e

Chapter 6

MODELLING IN ETABS

6.1 Import Architectural plan

The first step of modelling is the preparation of the frame of the structure.

This was done by importing the architectural plan made in AutoCAD. The .DXF file

of AutoCAD can be imported to ETABS easily by selecting File => Import => .DXF

file of Architectural grids.

Page 26: Major Project

24 | P a g e

Fig 6.1.1 Import AutoCAD file to ETABS

Page 27: Major Project

25 | P a g e

Fig 6.1.2: Final Plan of structure in ETABS

6.2 Defining Section Properties

The main step after getting the position of columns and beams in ETABS

is to define the various cross sections of these elements. Defining these

members include assigning the type of cross section and its dimensions,

the material used (concrete mix deign in this case).

The members can be defined by Define => Section Properties. Frame, slab

or wall sections whichever is to be defined.

Page 28: Major Project

26 | P a g e

Fig. 6.2.1: Defining Section Properties

Page 29: Major Project

27 | P a g e

Fig. 6.2.2: Defining Beam and Column properties

Fig. 6.2.3: Defining Slab properties

Page 30: Major Project

28 | P a g e

Fig. 6.2.4: Defining the wall section properties

Page 31: Major Project

29 | P a g e

6.3 Assigning Properties to various elements

These definitions can be assigned to different members by either selecting

them individually with mouse button clicks or by selecting them from the

select tool in the toolbar.

Fig. 6.3.1: Assigning properties

The sections assigned to any member can later be changed at any point of

time, very easily and effectively. In way the properties can be changed and then

analysed to check which dimension and type of member is more suitable for any

given requirement. This easy to use and nice graphical user interface makes the use of

ETABS easy, efficient and thus reliable.

Page 32: Major Project

30 | P a g e

Fig. 6.3.2: Assigning the slab section properties

After assigning various section properties, we may have a glance of how

the structure might look when it will be constructed. This can be seen by extrude

command from the tool bar.

Page 33: Major Project

31 | P a g e

Fig. 6.3.3: Rendered 3D view of the structure

Page 34: Major Project

32 | P a g e

6.4 Defining and Assigning Loads

After the completion of assignment of various properties, the next step

then is to assign loads to the various members. These loads include primarily the dead

load of the structure which is computed by the software itself. It is then followed by

assigning area loads at the slab levels which will come in the form of live load. Line

load on to beams may be assigned where cantilever slabs are present. The load is

automatically transferred from the slabs, to the beam and then columns and then

finally to the foundation provided.

Fig. 6.4.1: Defining Load Patterns

For this the load patterns must be defined first as shown in Figure. Also

Load combinations must be defined as per Indian Standard Codes. The software itself

creates some combinations as per the code in the software itself.

Page 35: Major Project

33 | P a g e

Fig. 6.4.2: Various Load Combinations

Fig. 6.4.3: The applied live load

Page 36: Major Project

34 | P a g e

6.5 Analysing the Structural Behaviour

This is perhaps the most important part for any structural designer. After

the structure has been analysed, it is of prime importance that the behaviour of

structure could be understood using the analysis results. The analysis results include

the moment, shear and torsion at any given section. Some of the analysis results are

shown in the figures below.

Fig. 6.5.1: Member force diagram (Moment 2-2)

Page 37: Major Project

35 | P a g e

Fig. 6.5.2: Member force Diagram (Shear 3-3)

Fig. 6.5.3: Member force diagram (Moment 3-3)

Page 38: Major Project

36 | P a g e

Fig. 6.5.4: Shell force diagram (Moment M 1-1)

Fig. 6.5.5: Deformed Shape (Load Combination: IS 10)

Page 39: Major Project

37 | P a g e

Fig. 6.5.6: Deformed Shape (Load Combination: IS 8)

Fig. 6.5.7: Deformed Shape (Load Combination: IS 1)

Page 40: Major Project

38 | P a g e

Fig. 6.5.8: Plan View of the Moment Diagrams

The above analysis results were considered and formed the basis of our design. The

moments were used to design the beams and axial load given by the software, formed

the basis of the bi-axial bending design of the columns. The Beams were also checked

for the shear forces.

Page 41: Major Project

39 | P a g e

Chapter 7

DETAILED DESIGN OF STRUCTURE

7.1 Design of footing :

The pile foundation was considered to be best fit for the loads

coming on the fixed restraints. The loads coming were in the range of

7000 KN to 11000 KN and hence piles were designed on the basis of

the loads coming on the columns. Combined piles- group of three piles

having diameter 400 mm and 600 mm were taking at appropriate

restraints.

The piles caps were designed on the basis of the bending moments

and hence checked for punching shear. The Pile Caps act like slabs

which distribute the load on the piles. The piles were given

reinforcement on of 12mm longitudinal.

The shearing angle considered for our analysis is Ф = 35 and the

number of under – reams in the 12 metre long pile were 4. The

average unit weight of the soil considered for our analysis was – 2 x

10-3

kg/cm3. The values obtained on the basis of the shearing angle

were : Nq = 41.4, Ny = 42.4 (Bearing Capacity Factors).

Page 42: Major Project

40 | P a g e

Fir7.1.1 Manual Calculations for Footing Design (Pile Bearing Capacity)

Page 43: Major Project

41 | P a g e

Fir7.1.2 Manual Calculations for Footing Design (Pile Bearing Capacity)

Page 44: Major Project

42 | P a g e

7.2 Beams

The plinth beams were grouped on the basis of the analysis and

these were hence designed based on their grouped bending moments.

The beams of further storeys having approximately similar bending

moments designed as per bending moment and checked for shear.

Proper shear reinforcement was provided. The design philosophy that

was used her was – ductility of structure should be maintained.

Therefore the beams are designed with less grade concrete as compared

to that of columns.

7.3 Columns

The columns were checked for axial compressive loads based on the

analysis and hence grouped in 4 types i.e. C1, C2, C3, C4; depending

on the axial loads of plus / minus 15% from the average were grouped

together and hence designed for the higher side.

Confined shear reinforcement was provided at beam and column joints

and at places of varying stiffness.

Fig. 7.3.1: Special Confining Reinforcement at the Joint of two floors,

ETABS Design Check

Page 45: Major Project

43 | P a g e

Fig. 7.3.2: Normal Shear Reinforcement in Column

7.4 Slab

Slabs were analysed as shells in ETABS which can bear some

moments and also transfer the loads on the respective beams. The

moment coming on slab was analysed and was in the range of 5 to

15KN/mm2. The slabs were designed on using formulae given in

IS:456 2000 and tensile reinforcement based on the bending moment

were provided. Slabs designed were of two types – i.e. One Way and

Two Way slabs.

7.5 Walls

The loads for façade work was considered in the analysis and

hence we propose that only façade work should be used for outer walls.

For internal brick walls, a proper gap should be considered in between the

columns and the walls. This gap should be filled with thermacol and

hence plastered. This is done to avoid the increase in stiffness in the actual

site and compared to the actual model which could result in the change in

the time period.

Page 46: Major Project

44 | P a g e

7.5 Shear Walls

Shear Walls are used to resist the lateral loads. They may prove to be

economical if designed properly. They are used resist the earthquake loads. Shear walls

used to resist the wind loads and earthquake loads. We have designed the shear walls of

350 of M-35. Their location depends on the stiffness required and care should be taken to

avoid any torsional rigidity. Various combinations of sheer walls were tried and this is

the configuration, which gave best results in terms of deflection, torsional mode shape,

and economy.

Fig. 7.5.1: Location of Shear Walls

Page 47: Major Project
Page 48: Major Project
Page 49: Major Project
Page 50: Major Project
Page 51: Major Project
Page 52: Major Project
Page 53: Major Project
Page 54: Major Project
Page 55: Major Project
Page 56: Major Project
Page 57: Major Project
Page 58: Major Project

56 | P a g e

Chapter 8

SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK

Future work should be concentrated on the use of damper that should like

Tuned mass Damper, Tuned liquid mass damper and their effects along with

economy. This can also be analysed in the software ETABS. This can have have

tremendous effects on the time period of the structure and can result in avoiding the

condition of resonance.

A Mass Damper, analysed as spring mass system results in increasing the

mass of the combined system and keeps the time period away from that of the

earthquake frequency.

Day by day the demand for the high rise is increasing and the number of

floors is also increasing as the money power is increasing. But for architectural and

structural limitations, the damper can come handy, especially in India, where

knowledge in this sector is limited to few.

The studies have to be conducted on the availability of the materials for

proper construction of the damper and also on the codal provisions should be worked

out for damping effects

Page 59: Major Project

57 | P a g e

Chapter 8

REFERENCES

IS 456:2000 “Plain and Reinforced Concrete- Code of Practice”

IS 13920:1993 Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Subjected to Seismic Forces – Code of Practice

IS: 4326-1993, "Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction of

Buildings - Code of Practice (Second Revision)"

IS: 456 -2000 “Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete”

IS: 1904-1987 “Code of Practice for Structural Safety of Buildings:

Foundation

IS: 1905-1987, Code of Practice for Structural Safety of Buildings:

Masonry

IS-NBC-2005: National Building Code of India

IS: 875-1987Design loads ( other than earthquake ) for buildings and

structures, Part2 Imposed Loads

IS: 875-1987Design loads ( other than earthquake ) for buildings and

structures ,Part 3 Wind Loads

V. Chandwani, V. Agrawal, N.K. Gupta in the journal IJERA mentioned “Role of

Conceptual Design in High Rise Buildings”.

IS 2911 - 1980, Part III “CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PILE

FOUNDATIONS PART III UNDER-REAMED PILES”