33
Nursing Responses to the Full Spectrum of Alcohol Use among Hospitalized Patients Lauren Matukaitis Broyles, PhD, RN Lauren Matukaitis Broyles, PhD, RN Research Health Scientist Research Health Scientist VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System Assistant Professor Assistant Professor University of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine School of Medicine

Mainstreams conversations about alcohol

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Nursing Responses to the Full Spectrum of Alcohol Use among Hospitalized Patients Lauren Matukaitis Broyles, PhD, RN Research Health Scientist VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System Assistant Professor University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Nursing Responses to the Full Spectrum of Alcohol Use among

Hospitalized Patients Lauren Matukaitis Broyles, PhD, RNLauren Matukaitis Broyles, PhD, RN

Research Health Scientist Research Health Scientist VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System

Assistant Professor Assistant Professor University of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh

School of MedicineSchool of Medicine

Mainstreams conversations about alcohol

Promotes professional nursing

Prevents alcohol-related harm for our patients and their families

An overall change in nursing practice that:

Question 1: Regarding the package of strategies known as alcohol SBIRT(select one)

a) b) c) d)

0% 0%0%0%

0 of 5

a) I have absolutely no idea what this is.

b) I’ve heard of it, but don’t know a lot about it.

c) I’m pretty familiar with it.d) I’m very familiar with it—

I’ve done it, implemented it, or, studied it.

Drinkers PyramidDrinkers Pyramid

3 - 7 % Drinkers with Abuse 3 - 7 % Drinkers with Abuse or Dependenceor Dependence

40% Abstainers40% Abstainers

35 - 40% Low-risk 35 - 40% Low-risk DrinkersDrinkers

10 - 15% Hazardous 10 - 15% Hazardous DrinkersDrinkers

BI

RT

Positive feedback, prevention message

S

Question 2: My biggest concern about bringing alcohol SBIRT into the inpatient setting is: (Select one)

a) b) c) d) e)

0% 0% 0%0%0%

0 of 5

a) How well it even fits with the acute care setting and mission

b) Whose responsibility it would be—who has the knowledge, skills, time, and motivation

c) Reimbursement d) How patients would reacte) Something else

Question 3: My initial thoughts about nurses taking on more active roles in alcohol SBIRT in inpatient settings are: (Select all that apply)

a) Nurses won’t have an interest in doing it, or they are already too busy/ overwhelmed.

b) I’m not sure if it’s really compatible with the nursing role or scope of practice.

c) Inpatients won’t go for it—talking about alcohol with a nurse, or, talking about it at all.

d) I don’t think we can get paid for it if nurses do it.

e) Something else

The PropositionThe Proposition

1.1. Spectrum orientationSpectrum orientation

2.2. Role for every nurseRole for every nurse

3.3. Workforce development starting Workforce development starting with pre-licensure studentswith pre-licensure students

4.4. Shaping organizational contextShaping organizational context

Drinkers PyramidDrinkers Pyramid

3 - 7 % Drinkers with Abuse 3 - 7 % Drinkers with Abuse or Dependenceor Dependence

40% Abstainers40% Abstainers

35 - 40% Low-risk 35 - 40% Low-risk DrinkersDrinkers

10 - 15% Hazardous 10 - 15% Hazardous DrinkersDrinkers

BI

RT

Positive feedback, prevention message

S

1.1. Spectrum orientationSpectrum orientation

2.2. Role for every nurseRole for every nurse

3.3. Workforce development starting Workforce development starting with pre-licensure studentswith pre-licensure students

4.4. Shaping organizational contextShaping organizational context

The PropositionThe Proposition

Nurse and System Readiness for

RN-SBIRT

RN-SBIRT Training Effectiveness and Implementation

Patient Acceptability for Nurse-delivered

SBIRT

Postdoctoral Fellowship

Assessing Readiness for Nurse Assessing Readiness for Nurse Implementation of Alcohol Implementation of Alcohol

Screening, Brief Intervention, Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment and Referral to Treatment

(SBIRT)(SBIRT)

DesignDesign

Phase I: Survey of inpatient nursesPhase I: Survey of inpatient nurses Knowledge, attitudes, and current clinical Knowledge, attitudes, and current clinical practice around alcohol-related carepractice around alcohol-related care

Phase II: Focus groups with med-surg Phase II: Focus groups with med-surg nursesnurses Anticipated facilitators and barriers to Anticipated facilitators and barriers to inpatient SBIRTinpatient SBIRT

Broyles LM, et al. (2012). Addiction Science and Clinical Practice, 7:7

Broyles LM et al. (2011). Qualitative Health Research, 21(12):1705-1718

Implementing a Nurse Implementing a Nurse Training Program for Alcohol Training Program for Alcohol Screening and Intervention Screening and Intervention

in Inpatient Medical Settingsin Inpatient Medical Settings

DesignDesign

Phase I: DevelopmentPhase I: Development

Phase II: ImplementationPhase II: Implementation

Phase III: Evaluation of Phase III: Evaluation of effectiveness and implementationeffectiveness and implementation

Results and ImplicationsResults and Implications

Broyles LM, et al. (2013). Journal of Addictions Nursing, 24(1): 8-19.Broyles LM, et al. (2013). Journal of Addictions Nursing, in press

Patient Acceptability for Patient Acceptability for Nurse-delivered Alcohol Nurse-delivered Alcohol

Screening, Brief Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in the Inpatient Treatment in the Inpatient

SettingSetting

Results and ImplicationsResults and Implications

AcceptabilityAcceptability for individual nurse- for individual nurse-delivered SBIRT care tasks was:delivered SBIRT care tasks was:high (>84%) and associated with perceived ability to high (>84%) and associated with perceived ability to determine own alcohol risks, concern about usedetermine own alcohol risks, concern about use

Personal discomfort Personal discomfort with individual with individual nurse-delivered SBIRT care tasks was:nurse-delivered SBIRT care tasks was:~20% and associated with white race, age >60, positive AU DIT-C, and lower ability to reduce risk

Broyles LM et al. (2012). Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(4):727-731

Nurse and System Readiness for

RN-SBIRT

RN-SBIRT Training Effectiveness and Implementation

Patient Acceptability for Nurse-delivered

SBIRT

Postdoctoral Fellowship

VA Career Development

Award

Efficacy of Nurse-Delivered Alcohol BI

for Hospitalized Veterans with

Hazardous Drinking

Trial of Nurse-delivered Trial of Nurse-delivered Alcohol Brief Intervention Alcohol Brief Intervention

for Hospitalized for Hospitalized VeteransVeterans

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01602172NCT01602172

3-arm RCT3-arm RCT

Primary outcomes at 6 months:Primary outcomes at 6 months:

drinks/week, binge drinking episodes, drinks/week, binge drinking episodes, alcohol-related problems, and alcohol-related problems, and motivation to change drinking behaviormotivation to change drinking behavior

Sample: 320 medical-surgical patients Sample: 320 medical-surgical patients with hazardous drinkingwith hazardous drinking

Nurse and System Readiness for

RN-SBIRT

RN-SBIRT Training Effectiveness and Implementation

Patient Acceptability for Nurse-delivered

SBIRT

Postdoctoral Fellowship

VA Career Development

Award

Efficacy of Nurse-Delivered Alcohol BI for Hospitalized Veterans

with Hazardous Drinking

Early Independent

CareerPrimary Care Studies

• Substance Use Care in Medical Homes

•Medical Residency Training in SBIRT

•Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for Alcohol BI Delivery

Implementation and Effectiveness of Nurse-delivered

Alcohol SBIRT Across Transitions of Care

[email protected]@va.gov Broyles LM, Gordon AJ. (2010). SBIRT implementation: Moving

beyond the multidisciplinary rhetoric. Substance Abuse, 31(4):221-223.

Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Price PA, Bayliss NK, Sevick MA. (2011). Overcoming barriers to the recruitment of nurses as participants in health care research. Qualitative Health Research, 21(12):1705-1718.

Childers JW, Broyles LM, Hanusa BH, Kraemer KL, Conigliaro J, Spagnoletti C, McNeil M, Gordon AJ. (2012). Teaching the teachers: Faculty preparedness and evaluation of a retreat in Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment. Substance Abuse, 33(3):272-277.

Broyles LM, Rosenberger EM, Hanusa BH, Kraemer KL, Gordon AJ. (2012). Hospitalized patients’ acceptability of nurse-delivered Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT).Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(4):727-731.

Broyles LM, Rodriguez KL, Kraemer KL, Sevick MA, Price PA, Gordon AJ. (2012). A qualitative study of anticipated barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nurse-delivered alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for hospitalized patients in a Veterans Affairs medical center. Addiction Science and Clinical Practice, 7:7, open access at:http://www.ascpjournal.org/content/pdf/1940-0640-7-7.pdf.

Broyles LM, Gordon AJ, Kengor C, Kraemer KL. A tailored curriculum of alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for nurses in inpatient settings. Journal of Addictions Nursing, in press.

Broyles LM, Gordon AJ, Rodriguez KL, Kengor C, Kraemer KL. Evaluation of a pilot training program in alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for nurses in inpatient settings. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 24(1): 8-19.

Broyles LM, Conley JW, Harding JD, Gordon AJ. A scoping review of interdisciplinary collaboration in addictions education and training. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 24(1): 29-38.

http://www.jointcommission.org/substance_use/http://www.jointcommission.org/substance_use/

http://hospitalsbirt.webs.com/http://hospitalsbirt.webs.com/

RE-AIMRE-AIM