42C13SW8381 2.7354 WABIKOBA LAKE 010

Report

on

Magnetic and Electromagnetic

Geophysical Surveys

Performed on

Gaby Lake Property

of

GOLDEN CENTURY RESOURCE CORPORATION

ociO W84

UIYDS

October 19, 1984 Toronto, Ontario

E. A. Gallo, F.G.A.C.Gallo Exploration Services Inc.

Magnetic and Electromagnetic Geophysical Surveys

GABY LAKE PROPERTY

Hemlo Area, Ontario

GOLDEN CENTURY RESOURCE CORPORATION

Introduction; Golden Century Resource Corp. recently acquired 3 large claim groups in the Hemlo Area of Ontario. One of these groups, termed the Gaby Lake Property, consists of 17 contiguous unpatented mineral claims. Linecutting was performed on the Gaby Lake Property in the summer of 1983, followed by geological mapping, a geochemical (soil sampling) survey, and geophysical {VLF EM and Mag) surveys. This report deals with the results of the geophysical surveys.

Location and Access; The Gaby Lake Property is situated in the Hemlo Area of Ontario. Hemlo lies along the north shore of Lake Superior, approximately midway between Thunder Bay and Sault Ste. Marie.

The Gaby Lake Property is easily reached. From Trans Canada Highway #17, one travels by car northwards on Highway #614 (the Manitouwadge Highway) for 3 miles (5 kilometers) to the Wabikoba Lake road, and then eastwards on the Wabikoba Lake road for 2^ miles (3^ kilometers) to a cut trail which leads southwards for 1/3 mile (^ kilometer) to the NW corner of the property.

All of the claims except one are situated on the Molson Lake Claim Plan (G-603). The remaining claim is on the Wabikoba Lake Claim Plan (G-620)

Claims Data; The 17 claims comprising the Gaby Lake Property are numbered TB 609191 - TB 609207, inclusive. All of the claims are in the Thunder Bay Mining Division, and are registered in the name of Golden Century Resource Corporation.

2.

The claims were recorded on October 27, 1982. The Linecutting, Geological Mapping, and Geochemical Survey were submitted for a total of 60 assessment work days per claim, however 2 of the claims, TB 609201 and TB 609202, were not fully approved because 2 small lakes partially covered these claims, prevent ing complete coverage of them.

Topography; The property is extremely flat. Maximum relief appears to be only 5-10 feet (2-3 meters). The north central part of the property is higher than the rest, and several outcrops occur there.

Previous Work; No record of any previous exploration work was found in the assessment files, and no evidence, of previous work was found on the ground.

General Geology; The Gaby Lake Property is underlain mainly by a series of Archean metasediments designated by Muir as the Heron Bay Sequence of the Schreiber-Marathon greenstone belt. These metasediments have been intruded by several granitic masses all of which are part of the Cedar Lake Pluton.

Linecutting; A Base Line was cut at Azimuth 117 0 through the middle of the property. Two short Tie Lines were cut parallel to the Base Line, in the NW and SE corners of the property. Cross Lines were cut at right angles to the Base and Tie Lines at 100 meter (330 foot) intervals, to the property boundaries. Picket station were established by chaining at 25 meter (82 foot) intervals on all lines.

3.

Magnetometer Survey; The Magnetometer Survey was performed during October, 1983, using a Geometrics Proton Magnetometer.

Base readings were taken along the Base Line, and all readings were progressively adjusted, where necessary, relative to the base readings.

The results of the Magnetometer Survey are shown on the map accompanying this report. Background magnetic intensity appears to be 600-700 gammas. The lowest magnetic reading recorded is 538 gammas, at station 1+50 N on Line 2 W. The highest magnetic reading recorded is 1964 gammas, at station 2+25 S on Line 8 E. A total of 1,158 readings were taken on the 17 claim group.

Nineteen magnetic anomalies were detected by the survey. The most prominent of these are all lineal zones oriented in a north-south direction. One such zone, Anomaly A, enters the property at the south end of Line 5 E, extends northwards for 800 meters (2,600 feet), leaving the property at the north end of L 2 E. Readings of up to 1842 gammas were obtained from Anomaly A, about 1,200 gammas above background.

Anomaly B enters the property at the south end of Line 13 E, extends northwards for 825 meters (2700 feet), and leaves the property at the north end of Line 10 E. Readings of up to 1625 gammas were obtained from Anomaly B, about 1000 gammas above background.

Anomaly C enters the property at the south end of Line 9 E, extends northwards for 800 meters (2600 feet), and leaves the property between the north ends of Lines 5 E and 6 E. Anomaly C displays readings of up to 1964 gammas, about 700 gammas above background.

Anomalies A, B, and C are all thought to be due to diabase dykes. As such they are of no direct economic interest, how ever, they do indicate structural zones of weakness in the earth's crust, and therefore could be of interest as possible depositional sites for remobilized, vein-type gold mineralization,

Anomaly D enters the property at the south end of Line 8, and extends northwards for 400 meters (1300 feet) to around 1+75 S on Line 5+50 E. The highest reading obtained in Anomaly D is 1804 gammas, about 1150 gammas above background.

Anomaly E enters the property from the north, between the north ends of Lines 4 E and 5 E. It extends southwards for 250 meters

4.

(800 feet) to around 0+50 N on Line 5+50 E. Readings of up to 1380 gammas were obtained from Anomaly E, about 700 gammas above background.

Anomalies D and E are similar to Anomalies A, B, and C in that they are lineal, cross-cutting features. However, Anomalies D and E appear to be shorter in length. They are probably offshoots of the main north-south diabase dykes.

Anomaly F is a conformable zone that extends from the south end of Line 10 W for 800 meters (2600 feet) to 0+75 N on Line 2 W. Readings of up to 1026 gammas were obtained from this anomaly, 400 gammas above background. Where the highest reading was obtained from this anomaly, at the north end of Line 7 W, a very weak, coincident VLF EM conductor occurs.

Anomaly G may also be a concordant zone. It occurs at the south end of Line 9 W, and extends for about 200 meters (700 feet) to 0+50 N on Line 7+50 W. Anomaly G is 500 gammas above background at its strongest point, and is directly coincident to a weak VLF EM conductor.

Anomaly H may be a distinct anomalous zone or it may be part of Anomaly C. The highest value obtained in Anomaly H is 1777 gammas, about 1100 gammas above background. This anomaly extends for 200 meters (700 feet), from 2+25 S on Line 8 E to 1+00 S on Line 6 E, and flanks a VLF EM conductor. It also appears to be coincident to portions of 2 gold geochemical anomalies, D and E.

Anomaly I occurs at the north end of Line 11 E. Anomaly I gave a maximum reading of 971 gammas, about 300 gammas above background. This anomaly appears to lie on strike with a very weak VLF EM conductor. Anomaly I is located adjacent to, and may be part of Anomaly B which is thought to be the magnetic expression of a diabase dyke.

Anomaly J is also located adjacent to Anomaly B, and therefore may have a similar source. This anomaly has a maximum reading of 1002 gammas, about 350 gammas above background. Anomaly J occurs at the south end of Line 14 E, and may be the strike extension of a weak gold geochemical anomaly which is coincident to a very weak VLF EM conductor.

Anomaly K occurs in the southeast corner of the property, along Line 18 E. The highest reading obtained from Anomaly K is 1755 gammas, 1100 gammas above background. This anomaly flanks a weak gold geochemical anomaly, anomaly M.

5.

Anomaly L is another anomaly that is adjacent to Magnetic Anomaly B. Anomaly L may be a distinct magnetic feature, or it may be part of Anomaly B and/or Anomaly J. Anomaly L has a maximum reading of 1677 gammas, about 1000 gammas above background. Anomaly L occurs at the south end of Line 12 E, and appears to be coincident to a portion of gold geochemical anomaly F.

Anomaly M occurs around 3+25 S on Line 6 E. Anomaly M may be a small distinct anomalous zone or it may be part of Magnetic Anomaly D, which is immediately adjacent to it, and which is thought to be due to a diabase dyke. Anomaly M has a maximum reading of 831 gammas, about 200 gammas above background. This anomaly occurs coincident to a portion of gold geochemical anomaly F.

Anomaly N is a small anomalous feature situated at 4+50 S on Line 6 E. This anomaly displays a maximum reading of 829 gammas, about 200 gammas above background, and it is coincident to a portion of gold geochemical anomaly H.

Anomaly O is another small zone, this one situated at 1+75 S on Line 6 W. Anomaly O has a maximum reading of 962 gammas, about 300 gammas above background, and it is coincident to a weak gold geochemical anomaly.

Anomalies P, Q, R and S also appear to be small anomalous zones, or perhaps the ends of larger zones. Their highest readings are 1034, 1072, 907, and 949 gammas, respectively. They occur at the north end of L 8 W, the south end of Line 9 W, 1+12.50 S on Line 8 W, and at the south end of Line 6 W, respectively. Anomalies p, R, and S occur along the strike extensions of gold geochemical anomalies K, G, and H, respectively.

Anomalies F through to S may be caused by litholigies that are relatively more mafic in composition than elsewhere on the property, or they may be caused by the presence of minor disseminated pyrrhotite.

Electromagnetic Survey; The Electromagnetic Survey was performed at the same time as the Magnetic Survey. A Phoenix VLF-2 instrument was used, and station NAA at Cutler Maine, broadcasting on a frequency of 17.8 KHz was read. In Phase and Field Strength readings were taken at each station, and the In Phase readings

6.

were then filtered using the Fraser Filter Method. Ten weakly- conductive zones were detected by the Electromagnetic Survey/ some of which have direct magnetic association and/or direct gold geochemical association.

Conductor A is a lineal, discordant zone that extends for 900 meters (3000 feet) from the south end of L 9 E northwards to the north end of L 2 E. This weak conductive zone flanks magnetic anomalies D and H, and transects gold geochemical anomalies B, C, D, E, F, H, and probably A.

Conductor B is a weak, lineal, concordant zone that extends for 900 meters (3000 feet) from 1+00 N on L 9 E, eastwards to 4+25 N on L 17 E. Conductor B is coincident to gold geochemical anomaly J, and lies along the strike extension of gold geo chemical anomaly B.

Conductor C occurs in the northeast corner of the property. It extends for about 300 meters (1000 feet) eastwards from 7+00 N on L 13 E to L 16 E. Conductor C appears to lie on strike to the east of magnetic anomaly I.

Conductor D is another weak, lineal, concordant zone. It extends from 0+ 12.5 N on L 14 E eastwards for 200 meters (700 feet) to 0+25 S on L 16 E. Conductor D appears to flank magnetic anomaly J, and also flank a weak gold geochemical anomaly.

Conductor E is a short, weak, apparently discordant zone that extends from 7+00 S on L O to 6+50 S on L l W. The south end of Conductor E is coincident to gold geochemical anomaly I.

Conductor F is another weak, lineal, concordant zone. It extends from 1+50 N on L 7 W to 2+OON on L 5 W. Conductor F is coincident to magnetic anomaly F, and is the eastward strike extension of a weak gold geochemical anomaly.

Conductor G occurs at 0+75 S on L 9 W, and extends eastwards to L 8 W at the.Base Line. Conductor G is weak, and is coin cident to magnetic anomaly G. It is situated along the eastward strike extension of a weak gold geochemical anomaly.

Conductor H is a very weak zone that extends from 5+25 S onL O, northwestwards for 100 meters (330 feet) to 5+00 S onL l W. Conductor H appears to be coincident to gold geochemicalanomaly H.

7.

Conductor I is a very weak, single-intercept response that occurs at 5+25 S on L 4 W. It is coincident to a weak gold geochemical anomaly.

Conductor J is another weak, single-intercept response. It occurs at 4+00 S on L O, immediately on strike to the east of gold geochemical anomaly G.

Conclusions; The Magnetic Survey has located nineteen anomalous zones, some of which are coincident to electromagnetic conductors and/or gold geochemical anomalies. The stronger magnetic anomalies are discordant lineal zones, and are thought to be caused by north-south trending diabase dykes. As such they represent zones of crustal weakness where vein-type gold deposits might occur. The weaker magnetic anomalies are generally con cordant, and they may be due to lithologies with a high ferromagnesian mineral content, or to lithologies that host minor disseminated pyrrhotite mineralization. Since small quantities of pyrrhotite are found in association with the pyritiferous tuff zone that hosts the gold mineralization at Hemlo, these magnetic anomalies also warrant additional exploration work to determine their causes.

The Electromagnetic Survey has located 10 conductive zones, all of which are weak. Some of the conductors are coincident to gold geochemical anomalies, and some have direct magnetic correlation, while others have both a geochemical and a magnetic association. All of the conductors that are associated with anomalous geochemical and/or magnetic readings warrant additional exploration work to determine the causes of their conductivity.

8.

Recommendations; The VLF EM conductive zones should be prioritized according to magnetic association, geochemical association, and type of host rock. These conductive zones should then be subjected to further exploration work to determine the causes of their conductivity. In conjunction with this, several of the north-south trending magnetic linears should be chosen for further work, to explore for the possibility of associated vein-type gold deposits. Wherever possible, the additional exploration work should consist of trenching. It is anticipated that in some areas the depth of overburden will not permit trenching to be feasible, and in areas such as these, consideration will have to be given to diamond drilling.

October 19, 1984 Toronto, Ontario

E. A. Gallo, F.G.A.C.Gallo Exploration Services Inc.

V,Ministry ofNaturalResources

of Work

Ontario

HepOH OT VVOrK it f

(Geophysical. Geological, iy/^/0 l\ ^ ̂Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Min 42C13SW8381 2.7354 WABIKOBA LAKE 300Type of Surveyls)

...-Geophysical (Magnejtpmeter s Electromagnetic!Claim Holder(s) HRC

Golden Century Resource*Corporation

Mfil^ftf ' frSke (G-603)and le), l Wabikoba Lake (G-620)

ProtpectorV Licence No.

T-1448 7

Date of Survey (from 81 to)

371 John Street, Thornhill, Ontario L3T 5W5Survey Company

Gallo Exploration Services Inc.Name and Addrets of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

E. A. Gallo, 148 Allanhurst Drive, Islington, Ontario M9A 4K7

Total Mllm of line Cut

17.1

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cuttingl

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 clays (for each)

Mnn Days

Complete reverse side and enter totalis} here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

Othor

Geological

Geochemical

Days perClaim

20

20

Geophysical

- Eleclromngnetir

Magnetometer

- Radiometric

Other

Goochnrnicnl

Days Per Claim

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisionscredits do not apply to Airborne Surveys

Days per Claim

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type ol Work Performed

Performed on ClaimU)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

15 =

l nstr uctions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned st the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix NumberE xpend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimNumber

Expend. Days Cr.

609191

609192

602193,609194

609195

609196

.6109.197.

609198

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. 17

t For Office Use Only

tcorded OCT. 'Date Approved M rtecoroto

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Nome and Postal Aclrtrass of Penon Certifying

E. A. Gallo, 148 Allanhurst Drive, Islington, Ontario M9A 4K7Dale Certified

Oct. 22/84Certifie

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

file.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Geophysical (Magnetometer Se Electromagnetic)

Township or AreaMolson (G-603) * Wabikoba (G-62Q)Lakfcs ^^ c^mf. TRAVERSED^tl - * -- TT-1J /-\ ^5^N T /"3 y"S VN ^"'r'S V\4- T 1 V*1 f O ̂ *v C^ ^^.T * V*^i ^v ^^ ̂ v-w*v^ *^. v* -* X. J ^s. *A f S J. _ --___ ___! 11..Claim Holder(s) Golden Century Resource Corporation

351 John St., Thornhill, Ont. L3T 5W5

Survey Company Gallo Exploration Services Inc.

Author of Report E., A. Gallo, 148 Allanhurst Drive

Address of Author Islington, Ontario M9A 4K7——,——Covering Dates of Survey Qnt:. ID - KTov. P2/Q4 . . . .

(linecutting to office)

17.1Total Miles of Line Cut.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim.

20

20

-Other.

Geological.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

nATR- Oct. 22/84_ SIGNATURE:thorof Report or Agent

Res. Geol. .Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Hold@C } o

fr

List numerically

(prefix) (number)

609192

609193••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i

..................................6.9.9194........

..................................6.9.8^85.........

..................................609196.....,.,

,,..,,,.,,,.,.........,....6.9.9.A-.9.1.......

.................................:...6.Q8^aft.......

..,.....,..,.,..,,..,.,,....6.99.i.?.?.........

........................fiaa^Q^..609203•••••^••••••••••••••••••* *T* * * JT* T* •••

........................6.9.82.9.4.

..................6.0.9.2.9.6.

609207••••••••••••••••••r* *T *T* *TT*T* ^••

IN

TOTAL CLAIMS. 17

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Mag- 1,158,Number of Stations 1/101________________Number of Readings EM- 2,202 Station interval______25 Meters______________Lme spacing 100 Meters———

Profile scale_________l cm ^ 10"^———^—-————-^^——..—--—^^.^^————— Contour interval_____50,100, 1000 Gammas____________________________

Instrument ______Geometrics Proton Magnetometer———————^^^^——(j

ROMAGNETIC

ELE

VIT

G

Z2H <N*~l

(4*CN—l

OOH

QW (J D

Accuracy — Scale constant l GammaDiurnal correction method progressive adjustments to readings within a closed loop Base Station check-in interval (hours)______l hour_____________;——^———^—————————Base Station location and value Along Base Line at Cross Lines. Values range______ __________________from 597 to 880 Gammas________________________

Instrument ____________Phoenix VLF 2__________________________________Coil configuration -—^———————-—————-..——^———.—-—.^—.^—-^—-—^^^^^—-—.-—^——.—.——.—

Coil separation _________________________________________________________——— Accuracy __________________________________________________________.^—^^. Method: E) Fixed transmitter C3 Shoot back CH In line O Parallel line Fremienry 17.8 K Hz - NAA - Cutler, Maine

specify V.L.F. station)measured In PhaS6 Snd Figld Strength

InstrumentScale constant.

^Corrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument -———Method D Time Domain ("l j V 'i ^ '-1 ' " ' ED Frequency Domain Parameters - On time ___________ , . ,._______ Frequency —————

- Off time __________!_________________ Range ————————— Delay time .^^— Integration time

Power.Electrode array —

aElectrode spacing .

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ——-————-——^^—^^————-——————————-——-———..—..——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument ——.Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)^^—^^——^——-——-————————.—.—-———-..——————

Height of instrument-——^^—^^————-——————^——————Background Count.Size of detector——.————-————————--^^^.^^^^^^^^^-—....—.-.-.^—..-.^.—.Overburden -^—^-———^———..——.——.——.—.—————--^^—^^———.—.———.——

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)Type of survey—————-——.-^-——^———————

Instrument ̂ ^—-—.———-—^-—————-———-—————.

Accuracy,——^^—-^^——^^^——————————————.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)—^—

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-———————--———...^—(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.————-————.——————————-————..—..—.Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight————————

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth^——— Terrain————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. __________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory..- Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -————.

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

1984 11 05 Your File: Our File: 2.7354

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

Me received reports and naps on October 26, 1984 for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic * Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 609191 et al 1n the Areas of Molson Lake and Wabikoba Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Me do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours sincerelyi

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto* OntarioM7A 1U3Phone: (416)965-4888

A. Barr:se

cc: Golden Century Resource Corporation 351 John St. Thomhlll* Ontario L3T 5U5

cc: E.A. Gall o148 Allanhurst Drive Islington* Ontario M9A 4K7

© Ministry of Technical Assessi Natural Resources Work Credits

Ontario ^p

119111 Rle 2.7354Date Mining Recorder's Report of

1984 12 12 Work *a 577

Recorded Holder GOLDEN CENTURY RESOURCES CORPORATION/HRC HEMLO RESOURCES CORPORATION

Township or Area

MOLSON LAKE AND WABIKOBA LAKF ARFA

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

20

|nd"C"ri polarization days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological—...--.--... days

Geochemical -,. . - — . .~ - .. - days

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision Q Ground fc~l

D Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

l l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 609191 to 200 inclusive 609203 to 207 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

10 DAYS MAGNETOMETER 5 DAYS MAGNETOMETER10 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC 5 DAYS ELECTROMAGNETIC

TB 609202 TB 609201

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

U'lO

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1984 12 12 Your File: 577 Our File: 2.7354

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O., Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed

for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

rundt Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

S. Hurst:mc

Encls.

cc: Golden Gentry Resources Corporation/ HRC Hemlo Resources Corporation 371 John Street Thornhill, Ontario L3T 5W5

cc: E.A. Gallo148 Allanhurst Drive Islington, Ontario M9A 4K7

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845

MinistryofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 12 12

2.7354/577

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

1984 12 31 Your File: 577 Our File: 2.7354

MlnUng RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O,, Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated December 12, 1984 Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims TB 609191 et al In the Molson Lake and Wabikoba Lake Area

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E,, YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whllmey Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

S. Hurst:mc

cci Golden Centry Resources Corporation/ HRC Hemlo Resources Corporation 371 John Street ThornMll, Ontario L3T 5W5

cc: E.A. Gall o148 Allanhurst Drive Islington, Ontario M9A 4K7

End.

cct Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OB1 SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

Signature of Assessor

Date

oUJI- (O

O)

E d*

UJ

V) UJo a:Z)oCO UJo:

tr z^ oCO

o: <ui uil- a:S*O ^

o: CD

UJ

crID

UJ O

UJo-l oC!)

UJ

CD

m <CD

8in w

8O CM

OO.in

o o o

o oin w

UJ1000 O)

H O O

UJ K

in

O)•*-0)E oO)cD* O

too E E oDI

OOm

iE lo

tic 3

-0

UJ CD

UJ(D

Q(D

OT

o:

o:ZJ O

o o

oo o

oo ^2 o

o -^ o o

toD

EE o

o in

M D

E E o 9Oo

Q. O

Z QM

OT CO O)

* n

E ?O ~V *Xe) z)'

LLJL^J

J

O

oUJh-

E d*

lilCO UJo(T

O CO UJ tt

o:H Z UJO

zUJ Q

I-

o l

UJo:

-J O-J

o: o

UJ

O C\J

Oo. inin CM

CM

CD

x uj2 iUJO

Q.

ro oo

I- o O* *

UJ

Oo

i; ^c o

IU

oUJ

s " 8lo- C Ao * .-

QP ^* ^^

0 * f?CD A U.

UJh- o

M

X

<

OK O

R

> o

J E l

Q. og o

o COen VU

Z UJ

o x;Q

C

tn zrf O,*fc. fr"

—* n-. ^.

E 2 *:(O

t" .z

UJ l

5: \Q \

poo J

O

zLU O

UJ

Q UJ

COo:

coUJo cc

oCO UJ GC

z o oo iQ *UJ Uo: *UJ <

tr oUJ

o:Z) Hz:LU O

UJ Q-J O O

m< o

UJco

o: u.

IO in

M

c 3

O OJ

IO

wO)

E d*

roGOO

O O

LU

< O

O OLO OJ

8OOJ

o o.IO

o oo

o o to

o

- o oLOw

o

z l

ozo

OO(M

o oQ. U VU