7

locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,
Page 2: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,
Page 3: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,
Page 4: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,
Page 5: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,
Page 6: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,
Page 7: locations I and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3 were 0.005, 0.009, and 0.007, respectively. Rogers' (1972) distances values between locations I and 2, and 2 and 3 were 0.028 and 0.029, respectively,