Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LNG & Gas Hubs
Ane de Ariño (October 2010)
1. LNG weight on gas markets
1. Gas Hubs depth and liquidity
1. Price linkage
1. Conclusions
1
2
3
4
- Relation between LNG and gas hubs -
LNG weigh on gas markets1
World gas demand
3000 Bcma
LNG
250 Bcma
LNG in Asia
4%
31%66%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
0%
100%
0%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
Asia
Asia Pacific = 500 Bcma Asian LNG consuming
countries = 275 Bcma(Japan, S.Corea, Taiwan, India
and China)
Asian LNG consolidated
markets = 130 Bcma(Japan S.Corea & Taiwan)
► Biggest LNG consuming region.
► 1/3 of the gas demand covered by LNG.
► Main LNG consuming countries 100%
dependency on LNG.
► Long term “ToP” contracts.
► Price Oil indexation (floor and ceiling)
► No HUB, but new spot price reference (JKM)
LNG 2009 =
152 Bcma
…security of supply
its the main driver
0%
100%
0%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
Pipeline
LNG
Indig. production
0%
56%45%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
36%
6%
58%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
67%11%
22%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
63%
23%
14%
Pipeline
GNL
P.PropiaEurasia = 1060 Bcma EU 27 = 540 Bcma LNG Europe = 275 Bcma
(France, Spain, UK, Belgium , Italy,
Turkey, Greece and Portugal)
LNG in Europe
Europe
LNG 2009 =
60 Bcma
► Declining indigenous production and high
dependency on Russian imports
► Clearly differentiated markets:
- Northwestern (Deregulated + interconnections
+ Hubs)
- Southern (Less deregulated + non developed
Hubs + poorly interconnected)
…coexistence of Long
Term “ToP” contracts with
increasing spot LNG and
pipeline supplies
0%
100%
0%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
Pipeline
LNG
Indig. production
14% 2%
84%Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
15% 2%
83%Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
14% 2%
84%Pipeline
GNL
P.PropiaAmerica = 945 Bcma N.America = 810 Bcma USA = 645 Bcma
(LNG = 13 Bcma)
LNG in USA
America
LNG 2009 =
20 Bcma
► USA: Biggest gas market with low
dependency on imports
► Boost in unconventional gas
production
► Unutilized new regasification
capacity
► High liquidity in gas Hubs Prices
respond quickly to changing
domestic supply and demand
balances…LNG demand forecast decreasing
year by year
USA LNG forecasts
0%
100%
0%
Pipeline
GNL
P.Propia
Pipeline
LNG
Indig. production
Gas Hubs2
World gas demand
3000 Bcma
Physical gas
traded in Hubs*
700 Bcma
* Stream estimation, assuming
most of US physical gas trade
Brent HH NBP ZEE TTF PSV CEGH NCG GNL
500
100
15
5 52 3 2 1
Churn rate > 10 = Liquid marketti
me
s
Churn rate
there’s still a long way to reach relevant liquidity in
European gas Hubs
LNG
NBP TTF ZEE NCG PEGs PSV CEGH BEB
2008
Bc
ma
1000
60
45
25
16 15 15
10
Traded volumes in
Gas Hubs in
Europe
3 Price linkage
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
8,00
10,00
12,00
14,00
16,00
ene-00
jul-00
ene-01
jul-01
ene-02
jul-02
ene-03
jul-03
ene-04
jul-04
ene-05
jul-05
ene-06
jul-06
ene-07
jul-07
ene-08
jul-08
ene-09
jul-09
ene-10
jul-10
$/MMBtu
HH Brent
0,00
2,00
4,00
6,00
8,00
10,00
12,00
14,00
16,00
ene-00
jul-00
ene-01
jul-01
ene-02
jul-02
ene-03
jul-03
ene-04
jul-04
ene-05
jul-05
ene-06
jul-06
ene-07
jul-07
ene-08
jul-08
ene-09
jul-09
ene-10
jul-10
$/MMBtu
NBP Brent120% 70%
0,2 0,7
▲ Oil index
▲ HH
▲ Oil index
▲ NPB
NBP/Oil form. = 100% 110% 80%
Correlation = 0,6 0,4 0,85
HH/Oil form. = 145%
Correlation = 0,8
NBP vs.
Oil index
HH vs.
Oil index
2000-2003 2004-2007 2007-2010$/MMBtu
-10,00
-5,00
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
ene-00
jul-00
ene-01
jul-01
ene-02
jul-02
ene-03
jul-03
ene-04
jul-04
ene-05
jul-05
ene-06
jul-06
ene-07
jul-07
ene-08
jul-08
ene-09
jul-09
ene-10
jul-10
$/MMBtu
Spread HH Brent
NBP vs. HH
90% 120%
0,5 0,9
NBP/HH ratio = 70%
Correlation = 0,6
Future
loss of US LNG attractive in favour of European hubs
… will European Hubs be able to maintain this spread to
HH in the long term?
-10,00
-5,00
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
ene-00
jul-00
ene-01
jul-01
ene-02
jul-02
ene-03
jul-03
ene-04
jul-04
ene-05
jul-05
ene-06
jul-06
ene-07
jul-07
ene-08
jul-08
ene-09
jul-09
ene-10
jul-10
$/MMBtu
Spread HH Brent
we’ve seen some effect on NBP prices from S. Hook
output, but still very limited.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
NB
P (G
Bp
/th
)
Emis
ión
(Mcm
/d)
35South Hook
(Qatar) UK
vs.
NBP
30 (GBp/th)
(Mmcm/d)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
NB
P (G
Bp
/th
)
Emis
ión
(Mcm
/d)
140
Norway UK
vs.
NBP
30 (GBp/th)(Mmcm/d)
Conclusions4
Market
Buyers
Sellers
Conclusions4
► In our view, the question today is more how much the hubs have effect on LNG
trade than the opposite
► In a market where increased flexibility and uncommitted LNG contributes in a 20-
30% of the total LNG trade, gas Hub prices are one of the key elements that can
attract flexible LNG around the world.
► LNG short term pricing is driven by the forces of supply and demand of different
regions, and it is increasingly disconnected from long-term contracts prices
► Neither the markets nor the suppliers are driving the industry towards full
“commoditization”, nonetheless, some convergence of LNG pricing may occur.
► We still have a long way to reach a level of total “globalization”, comparable to
oil markets… … but are we in the process of slowly and gradually breaking away
LNG Oil indexation to some LNG Gas Price?
take a look at www.streamrgn.com
Thank yougracias
mercy
grazie
obrigado
danke
dank u
σας εσταριστούμε
ありがとう
谢谢
당신을 감사하십시오
вы
شكرا ً