View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
For the year ending July 2011
Citation preview
financial statementsfor the year ended 31 July 2011
introductionThe Financial Statements for the year ended 31st July 2011 represent another
strong financial performance for the University. The University has continued
to invest in key areas of activity with a common focus to enhance the positive
experience of students studying at our institution.
Despite the financial climate the University has continued to invest in its capital
programme with significant advances in supporting the Tom Reilly Building,
supporting Sport and Exercise Sciences, and the Redmonds’ Building that will
open in the summer of 2012 and provide excellent general teaching facilities
for Business, Law, Media, Arts and the Social Sciences.
The Balance Sheet has maintained its strength. Income and Expenditure
Reserves are showing a significant increase compared with the previous year.
Total reserves have been strengthened.
We are entering a period of decline in public spending and this is likely to
continue for some years. In addition, the introduction of the new student fees
regime in 2012, and other changes to core funding, contribute to further
financial uncertainty. The University will be required to make some significant
decisions in the near future both in terms of its future strategy and direction
and how it will continue to be able to finance its plans. We are not alone in
facing such challenges, but we are in a strong position moving forward and we
will deal with the challenges and look to capitalise on new opportunities.
I want to thank the staff across the University for the excellent results achieved
this year – academic, financial and strategic. As already commented, these are
uncertain times, but we can build upon our sound base and look to the future
with confidence.
Professor Nigel P. Weatherill, FREng, DSc
Vice-Chancellor and Chief Executive
contentsOperating and Financial Review 2
Public Benefit Statement 32
Board of Governors 40
Officers and Advisors ofthe University 41
Responsibilities of the Boardof Governors 42
Corporate Governance 43
Report of the Auditors 47
Statement of PrincipalAccounting Policies 49
Consolidated Income andExpenditure Account 51
Balance Sheets 53
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 54
Statement of Consolidated TotalRecognised Gains and Losses 55
Notes to the Financial Statements 56
1
scope of the
2
operating and financial review
Financial StatementsThese are the consolidated statutoryaccounts of Liverpool John MooresUniversity and its subsidiaries for theyear ended 31 July 2011.
3
Our mission is to serve and enrich our students, clientsand communities by providing opportunities foradvancement through education, training, research and thetransfer of knowledge.
LJMU is working towards a new future where it will berecognised nationally and internationally for its graduatecareer opportunities, a university of choice fororganisations in search of research and consultancy thatwill help them compete in an increasingly global economy.
We believe we can achieve these goals. The foundationsare already in place, and the supporting structures welldeveloped.
mission
4
7
strategic objectivesThe mission, core purpose and values are
the explicit platform for the University's
Strategic Statement and Plan for the period
2007-2012; and articulate the Fundamental
Concepts of Excellence, as defined by the
European Foundation for Quality
Management (EFQM), in ways meaningful
to LJMU.
We have introduced a major new initiative
that will deliver to our students high quality
academic programmes connected to the
world of work and business plus a range of
measures and cer tified experiences and
personal skills that will best equip them for
successful careers. Specifically, the strategic
plan focuses on an innovative concept,
which, internally, we call World of Work
(WoW®) that centres on employer
engagement and graduate careers. For this
reason World of Work has been devised as
the means by which our students can
accumulate broader high-level ‘world-of-
work’ skills; to have these assessed and
certified independently of their academic
study, giving prospective employers absolute
confidence of the value of an LJMU
graduate, whether this be in the private,
public, or voluntary and social employment
sectors. To achieve this successfully we
believe that it is critical that employers are
actively involved in the process.
We are also continuing to maintain growth
in our traditional public income sources
whilst increasing significantly growth rates
in income from non-public sources, such as
contract research, commercial enterprise
and knowledge transfer.
We are also focussed on maintaining our
reputation for excellence in governance
and management, through continuous
development and improvement against the
rigours of the EFQM Excellence Model, and
through the continued development of a
strong strategic management focus.
7
studentsLJMU is the tenth largest University in the UK with 25,068students in Liverpool plus a further 4,500 studentsenrolled on accredited University courses overseas.Actual full time equivalent numbers for 2010/11 were19,658 a decrease of 4% compared with 2009/10.
The drop in numbers is primarily due to the large cohortsat levels 2 and 3 in 2009/10 now only occurring at level 3.Actions were taken in respect of recruitment targets for2010/11 onwards which caused the contraction byaround 5% per annum in the coming years to reflect theplanning intention for a managed reduction in studentnumbers. The large actual intake at level 1 for 2011/12may however counteract this.
8
9
05/06 10/11
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
Student Applications
05/06 10/11
17000
18000
19000
20000
21000
16000
Student FTEs
The WoW Programme continuesto be recognised as a best practicecase study in nationally importantpublications and conferences in2011 including CBI and COGENT:(Sector Skills Council for theScience Based Industries) andNational Union of StudentsNational Report and hosting manyVIP visitors who have been keento see what LJMU is doing.
During the year 5,500 students,from all year groups, voluntarilyregistered for the WoW skillscertificate module with studentssubmitting 1600 Bronze, Silver orGold statements. The WoWcertificate continues to bedesigned, developed and deliveredcollaboratively with many employerpartners and is being modified andimproved following feedback.
Over 3,500students are
actively engagedin reflecting onand recording
key graduate skills.
Several key business decisions have been taken inrelation to the academic portfolio. These includechanges to the Academic Framework and theclosure of a number of programmes all designedto ensure the efficient delivery of a quality offeringthat is fit for purpose as we enter a period ofuncertainty within an increasingly competitivemarket place.
Graduate Skills and the WOW Programme haveseen significant successes this year:
10
11
The Graduate DevelopmentCentre has received outstandingfeedback from student users e.g.96% (665) said they wouldrecommend GDC sessions to afriend, 98% (924) said thesession were well delivered, 89%agreed that they were moreconfident about managing theirfuture and moving their careerforward etc.
In a successful qualityassurance visit conducted by the
Department of Business,Innovation and Skills the Assessor
said: “The GDC puts studentsfirst and this approach provides a
platform of excellence andsupport”. A student said:
“The support for students hereis very good. It’s much more than
just a careers service”.
Collaborative relationships with theWoW National Employers Groupcontinue to flourish with members ofNational and Local WoW EmployerAdvisory Groups including Barclays,Royal Mail, GKN, Oracle, LiverpoolChamber of Commerce, Co-operativeGroup, Enterprise Rent-A-Car andFord. Over 160 Employee Verifiers havebeen trained and are delivering thecritical final 1:1 interview stage of theWoW certificate.
In 2011 LJMU recordedits highest number of
graduates in employmentor education/training for 3
years at 89.1%, the numberin graduate jobs rose by
1.6% and unemploymentfell by 1.6%
The European SocialFund supported
Graduate AcceleratorProgramme has
delivered all outputsand developed the
employability of 450unemployed graduates.
The Graduate DevelopmentCentre has achieved majorsuccesses in employer relationsbrokerage and work relatedlearning including placements withLovell Construction, Liverpool CityCouncil, Datel Group Computing,and Lake Technologies (SME). Anew job vacancy portal hasattracted over 1,500 vacanciesfrom 1,000 different employers.
LJMU is exporting its knowledge and
enhancing its international reputation
by running a Malaysian Ministry of
Higher Education funded WoW skills
certificate pilot programme at
Malaysia’s largest public university –
Universiti Teknologi Mara. This was
successfully completed in the autumn
of 2011. The GDC has delivered
WoW related sessions in the USA,
Vietnam, Spain, and France, The
Philippines and Thailand
Following on from the results of RAE2008, the University continues to focus itsresearch efforts and resources in areas of demonstrable research excellence.Core HEFCE research funds are devolved to Faculties and are now largely usedto support academic staff costs in research-active schools. In 2010 (to reflect thecurrent economic climate), the target for future year on year growth wasreduced to 5%.
research
A high reliance on public-sectorfunding (research council, NHSand local authority) and thebudget constraints imposed onthose external funding streamscoupled with ever-increasing inter-University competition has hadconsiderable impact on the levelsof external funding available. LJMUis also heavily reliant on a smallnumber of research areas / stafffor the bulk of its grant income.
Particular research strengthsremain in STEM (e.g., electricaland general engineering,maritime, astrophysics, builtenvironment, life sciences, publichealth) and STEM-relatedsubjects (e.g., biologicalanthropology, sports sciences).Together these account for>90% of external researchincome to LJMU.
The institutional target forresearch income has not beenmet. External research grantincome fell by 16.5% in 2010/11compared to the previous year.HESA research income (a morebroadly defined measure includingcommercial (contract research)and KTP income) fell by 17.5%.
12
R-coded research expenditure HESA R income
Ex
pe
nd
itu
re/In
co
me
(£’0
00
)
Year
Despite the fall in grant incomeover recent years, LJMU remains54th in the UK for research grantincome (as measured bybenchmarking HESA researchincome for 2009/10 – the latestcomparative dataset available),well ahead of the majority ofpost-1992 HEIs and ahead ofsome well-established research-led Universities.
UK Research Councilincome (the most
competitive source ofresearch funding)
accounts forapproximately 16%
of our totalresearch income.
13
02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11
0
5000
10000
15000
Research grantincome is asignificant driverfor LJMU’sHEIF income.
Academic staffcontinue to submitsubstantive researchgrant bids to externalorganisations at arate in excess of 230grant bids per annum.
Planning for the next round ofresearch assessment (theResearch ExcellenceFramework, REF2014) is wellunderway and all Units ofAssessment being consideredfor submission have beensubject to at least one roundof expert external reviewsover the last 12 months.
Plans for the use of HEFCERCIF2 funds for researchcapital were approved.These will be used tostrengthen selected areas ofresearch excellence withinthe institution and use ofthese funds will, whereappropriate to do so, alignwith on-going capital.
LJMU continues tolever externalresearch grant
income using coreHEFCE research
income at a rate at> 3.3:1 (well ahead of
the sector average).
The 5-year averagerate of growth of
external research grantincome is second
highest of North WestUniversities and
remains amongst thehighest in the UK.
14
15
The University combines Higher Education Innovation Fund (HEIF) funding and core
funds to ensure continuation of a range of support for Commercial Enterprise,
Technology Transfer and Student Entrepreneurship activity across the University.
Successful complementary European Union funding bids are used to further develop
the support for student and alumni start-up businesses.
During the year the annual Higher Education Business and Community Interaction
survey (HEBCIS) was published and showed the total annual value of LJMU’s
interaction with business and the community reached £16.6m. Ranked against the
165 UK HEIs in the survey, LJMU was 46th (2009 48th) for the total value of
interaction with business and the community.
commercial enterprise,technology transfer andstudent entrepreneurship
03/04
Enterprise Income
0
2
4
6
05/06 07/08 09/10
£m
16
In 2010/11 the University’s commercial
enterprise turnover reached £4.5m.
During the year, 26% of income from commercial enterprise and
technology transfer activity came from international contracts.
Average contract value was £25.6k (up from £20.5k in 2009/10)
During the year, preparations were made for the opening
of LJMU’s dedicated Centre for Entrepreneurship.
A Knowledge Transfer Partnership between LJMU’s School of Engineering,Technology and Maritime Operations and Risktec Solutions won NW RegionalPartnership Award 2011.The project saw the development of a range ofaccredited qualifications (Certificate, Diploma and MSc) in Risk and SafetyManagement for high hazard industries. Other successful KTPs completed duringthe year included 2 year partnerships with Alder Hey Children’s NHS FoundationTrust, Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service and the British Red Cross.
In 20010/11 the number of students undergoing bespoke
entrepreneurship training grew to over 1,600, the high
profile and popular Start-Up Network attracted 249 new
members (making membership of nearly 1,500) and
Enterprise Fellowships were awarded to support the
establishment of more than 21 student businesses.
During the year, LJMU partnered with Cheshire Constabulary to jointly designa Postgraduate Certificate in Forensic CCTV Analysis. This unique, accreditedprogramme will be delivered by practitioners from Cheshire Constabulary andacademics from the School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences.
17
The year saw a rationalisation of the LJMU spin out company portfolioand a number of encouraging developments with remaining companies,including Forsigs and Microsense. A range of commercialisationopportunities also emerged for the Pharmalucia technology which useslight-activated compounds principally for the infection control market.
LJMU secured contracts relating to public health, such
as the development of a partnership with Liverpool
Primary Care Trust and Liverpool City Council to
develop strategies to improve the nutritional value of
takeaway foods and work with Liverpool First for
Health and Wellbeing Partnership to train nursery staff
around nutrition for the under 5’s.
Academic partnerships strengthened through geographically
targeted initiatives in, for example, Malaysia and China. Academic
Partnership income showed 9% growth since 2009/10.
Conference and Events Services income showed 21% growth since2009/10 and the team’s expertise in event management wasdemonstrated in three successful graduation events during the year.
LJMU was the provider of choice for over 70 SMEs whoengaged with the University via the NWDA InnovationVouchers Scheme which drew to a close during the year.
LJMU’s Summer Semester programme was the most successful ever
with nearly 700 students from seven partner institutions studying at
LJMU for 14 weeks to top up their current awards to Honours level.
18
resourcescapital development highlights
Despite the financialclimate the Universityhas continued toinvest in its capitalprogramme andwork has beenongoing at all threeCampus areas.
Continuing on from the opening of the £25.5m Tom Reilly Buildingduring 2009/10, this state-of-the-art building, which houses theSchool of Sports and Exercise Sciences and the School of NaturalSciences and Psychology, offers some of the best facilities in theworld. These include appetite laboratories, psychology testing labs,neuroscience labs, an indoor 70-metre running track, physiologysuites, a DEXA scanner for measuring body fat, muscles and bonedensity, a driving simulator and a chronobiology lab.
19
Development of the Redmonds’ Building, a £34m generalteaching and screen academy development for the Facultiesof Business and Law and Media, Arts and Social Science, isongoing. Demolition of the existing building has beencompleted and the new build work has commenced. Theproject is on time and cost and is due for completion inJune 2012. Students and staff will be using the building andits facilities from the beginning of the 2012 academic year.
The University has now acquiredthe former Royal Mail Site atCopperas Hill for the sum of £2.6million. The acquisition of thismajor building now provides asolution to the challenge ofrelocation of the Faculty ofEducation Community and Leisure,currently located in the IM MarshCampus for which the Masterplanning work is now underway.
On City Campus the window replacement and cladding project,3rd floor refurbishment of teaching accommodation, 2 lecturetheatre refurbishment projects and the high voltage infrastructureare complete. A further £2m funding has been released to continuewith the next phase of this refurbishment work and this will includerefurbishment of all general teaching accommodation on the firstfloor and also a number of lecture theatre enhancements. MaxPerutz Building - the University has received confirmation fromLiverpool City Council that planning approval has been granted. It isanticipated that the total project cost will be £6.5 million and workwill commence on site in January 2012.
20
resourcesIT developments
Significant progress has beenmade on the new studentsystem, Campus Solutions,
with some modules going livein September 2010 and the
remainder over the course ofthe academic year with allstudents enrolling through
the system for the 2011/12.
IT resilience has been further secured by the purchase andinstallation of an innovative Hewlett Packard PerformanceOptimised Datacenter (POD). The overall system ofpower supply and storage, the first of its kind deployed inthe UK, represents a huge step forward for LJMU’scomputing network users, not only in terms of energyefficiency and sustainability, but also reliability and peace ofmind for its end users.
21
resourcesenvironmental sustainability
A Carbon ManagementProject Board is establishedto oversee the University’scommitment to the carbonmanagement programme,carbon reductioncommitment, Ecocampus andthe ‘People and Planet’ greenleague table, as part of theUniversity’s corporate andsocial responsibility agenda.
The University has developed andapproved a comprehensive CarbonManagement Plan and Programmewhich is assisting the University toface the future challenges, such asrising utility costs and compliancewith legislation. It will also assist incontrolling operating costs andmaking a significant contribution togovernment and HEFCE carbonreduction targets.
The Plan is underpinned byvarious policies and strategiesincluding the EnvironmentalPolicy, the Procurement Strategy,the Sustainable ProcurementPolicy, the Travel Plan, theBiodiversity Policy, the CarbonManagement Policy, the EnergyPolicy, the Waste and RecyclingPolicy and the Print Strategy.
22
We haveregistered as amandatoryparticipant to theCarbon ReductionCommitment(CRC) scheme.
The first two yearsof the carbon
management planshould deliver a saving
of approximately2,620 tonnes CO2
which equates to 70%of our 25% target.
An additional year has been added to the project plan
which increases our target from 25% by 2013/14 to
28% (4,190 tonnes CO2) by 2014/15. (This continues
to move our target closer to the governments targets
of 34% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 based on 1990
emissions, and HEFCE targets of 43% by 2020 and 83%
by 2050 based on 2005/6 Scope 1 and 2 emissions.)
During the year our efforts have been rewarded through beingawarded the Ecocampus environmental management systemBronze award in April 2011 (just six months after registering),
received a First Class Honours in the People and Planet GreenLeague Table (the highest rating of the Liverpool based
Universities), we were also presented with a certificate by theChief Executive of the Carbon Trust in recognition of our work
in reducing emissions, cutting costs and the mitigation of climatechange during 2010 and we are finalists in the 2011 North West
Excellence Awards within the Sustainability category.
The majority of2010/11 carbonreduction projectshave beencompleted and the2011/12 programmeis underway.
23
sports facilitiesAn agreement with Liverpool City Council’s Sports and Leisure Division provides the following facilities to studentsand staff:
The provision ofgeneral access toa range of sportsand leisurefacilities across theLife Style venues.
To progressively allowthe relocation of thoseacademic programmesthat have a sport relatedcomponent which arecurrently delivered at theIM Marsh Campus to theWavertree Centre.
To enable the LSU toprovide facilities forits club and societies,presently providedeither at IM Marsh orpurchased fromprivate providers.
24
26
results for the yearThe University’s consolidated Income, Expenditure and Resultsfor the year to 31 July 2011 are summarised as follows:
2010/11 2009/10
£000 £000
Income 176,267 178,971
Expenditure 167,270 176,672
Surplus after depreciation of assets at valuation and before tax 8,997 2,299
Loss on disposal of fixed assets - (3,114)
Surplus/(deficit) after depreciation of tangible fixed assets at 8,997 (815)valuation and disposal of fixed assets and before tax
Share of Operating (loss)/profit in associate 15 58
Taxation - -
Surplus/(deficit) before Exceptional Item 9,012 (757)
Fundamental Restructuring Costs - (8,009)
Surplus/(deficit) on continuing operations after depreciation of 9,012 (8,766)tangible fixed assets at valuation, disposal of assets and tax
Surplus/(deficit) for the year transferred to accumulated income 96 (153)in endowment funds
Surplus/(deficit) for the year 9,108 (8,919)
Surplus/(deficit) for the year on a historical cost basis 9,838 (5,180)
An underlyingoperatingsurplus of£12.7m
Historicalcost surplusfor the year
£9.84m
Capitalexpenditure
£21.1m
Incomedecreaseof 1.5% to£176.3m
Decreasedexpenditureof 5.3% to£167.3m
Net worthat £101mbeforepensionliabilities
27
income and expenditure account2010/11 has been an excellent year as a result of the continuing
strategic approach to the finances of the university with an outturn
surplus of £9.8m for the year. An underlying operating surplus of
£12.7m was achieved. The annual FRS17 charge was £2.86m with
the Pension liabilities in the Balance Sheet increasing by £1.1m.
Total Income decreased by 1.5% to £176.3m. The main decrease
was due to HEFCE core funding of £5.2m, research income and
capital grants. This was partly compensated by HEFCE and TDA
earmarked grant increase of £1.5m. Decreases in Research
Council, and Health contracts were compensated by equivalent
increase in collaborative income.
Expenditure decreased by 5.3% to £167.3m. Staff costs have
decreased by 5.5% which reflects the fundamental restructuring
which took place last year and has assisted with the delivery of
significant savings in this and future years. Other operating costs
also decreased as part of the overall savings targets achieved
throughout the university. The impact of FRS17 (Retirement
Benefits) was a decrease to group surplus of £2.86 (2009/10
£4.2m).
28
balance sheetThe Balance Sheet has maintained its strength. Income and Expenditure Reserves excluding the
Pension Reserve (associated with FRS17) are £53.9m showing a significant increase of £12.7m
compared with the previous year. However following the increase in revaluation reserve last year
as a result of the property valuation, the revaluation reserve has decreased this year by £0.7m to
match depreciation with the revaluation. The pension liability reserve has increased by £1.1m. Total
reserves are now £36.3m compared to £25.4m the previous year.
Fixed Assets have increased by £11.7m. Assets under Construction are £17.3m (09/10 £6.7m)
following the reclassification of the building works at Tithebarn and Byrom Street and the current
value reflects in the main the spend on the Redmonds’ Building.
Cash deposits have increased by £6.83m during the year and a further tranche of £10m of
borrowing was drawn down. Capital expenditure was £21.1m.
200
150
100
50
003/04 05/06 07/08 09/10
Income and Expenditure
£m
29
governance and riskThe University’s governance practices are
consistent with the revised “Guide for
Membership of Higher Education Governing
Bodies in the UK” by the Committee of
University Chairman (CUC), published in
November 2004.
The University remains strongly committed
to adopting best practice in terms of
Governance and Management. The
management system has been developed and
improved since 2002 using the EFQM
Excellence model framework. Building on the
success of becoming the only university in
Europe ever to reach the standard required
to win a full excellence award (winning the
UK Excellence Award in 2008) The University
has since been a finalist in the European
Excellence Award, going on to be announced
as a Prize Winner in the category of ‘Building
Partnerships’ at the awards ceremony in
Munich in October 2011.
Risk management has been incorporated into
the corporate planning and decision making
processes of the University. The Institutional
Risk Register is reviewed on a regular basis in
conjunction with the periodic assessment of
performance against objectives.
30
futureDuring the last 12 months the political and economic climate hascontinued to change significantly. The university has determined its fee levelto be £9,000 and acknowledges that there remains continued uncertaintysurrounding funding levels, costs and tuition fees. The next 4 years will bean extremely difficult period.
The University is however determined to deliver its strategic plan andcontinue with its ambitious capital programme. This will require focus andhard decisions. The SMG have a plan of activities over the next 6 monthswhich will have both short and medium term impact on sustainability.
conclusion2010/11 has been an extremely successful year and this along with ourstrong leadership and strategic direction places LJMU in a strong androbust position to deal with the challenges and difficulties we will face inthe financial climate ahead.
Sir M Thornton, Chairman
31
delivering the public benefitLiverpool John Moores University (LJMU) is a Higher
Education Corporation (HEC), as defined by the Education
Reform Act 1988.
The powers of the HEC are defined in Section 124 of the
1988 Act as amended by the Further and Higher Education
Act 1992, and subject thereto any relevant regulations, orders
or directions made by the Secretary of State or Privy Council.
These powers include the power to provide higher and
further education and to carry out research and to publish
the results of such research.
The corporation has exempt charitable status as defined under
the Charity Act 1993. As an exempt charity the University is
regulated by HEFCE by virtue of the Charities Act 2006.
statement of public benefitThe Board of Governors has complied with its duty to have
due regard to the guidance on public benefit published by
the Charity Commission and particularly to its
supplementary public benefit guidance on the advancement
of education, in accordance with the requirements of
HEFCE acting as principal regulator of English higher
education institutions under the Charities Act 2006.
32
mission, vision and valuesThe University’s mission, vision and values reflect LJMU’s
commitment to the public benefit. LJMU’s mission is to
serve and enrich our students, clients and communities by
providing opportunities for advancement through
education, training, research and the transfer of knowledge.
Since becoming a university, LJMU has grown substantially to
extend the scope and accessibility of higher education in
the UK. From around 8,000 students in 1988, LJMU now
has more than 25,000 students studying across its 5 faculties,
with approximately 8,000 students graduating this year.
LJMU’s core values are embedded in the University’s
Strategic Plan which illustrates clearly the University’s
commitment to the public benefit:
To create appropriate high
quality opportunities that
enable learning,
advancement, development,
and employment, and that
are open to as many
individuals and
communities as is
achievable and sustainable.
To create and support
opportunities for
successful participation by
under-represented groups,
as well as for continuing
personal, professional and
skills development for all
members of the
University.
33
To create an environment inwhich staff and students canengage in research that isinnovative; that contributes toknowledge or to professionalpractice; that encouragespersonal and professionaldevelopment; that enhanceslearning; or that is of social oreconomic importance tocommunities.
To reinforce the entirerange of activities with
a culture ofscholarship, and with a
growing body ofspecific research that isconsistently of national
and internationalstanding and benefit.
To endeavour throughpartnership andenterprise to impactupon economicdevelopment andregeneration, as well associal and culturaladvancement, whetherat local, national orinternational levels.
34
This section highlights areas in which LJMU has carried out its activities for the
public benefit during the year in furtherance of its mission to serve and enrich
students, clients and communities.
Research: LJMU is one of the leading UK Universities for Sport & Exercise Sciences;General Engineering; Public Health; and Astrophysics research; for example, LJMU designed,built, and now operates the world’s largest robotic astronomical telescope.
The Liverpool Science Park is a joint venture with the University of
Liverpool and Liverpool City Council, fostering and facilitating growth
in the knowledge economy in Liverpool.
University academic staff are expected to publish the results of research they have
undertaken in peer reviewed academic journals, to publish books, to submit and present to
research conferences and to feed that research into their teaching. The University makes
available publicly, via its website, access to its research archive and has collaborative and
reciprocal arrangements in place with other university libraries for access or borrowing
facilities for students and academic staff.
Economic Development: LJMU manages European Development
Fund Contracts worth £34m for the benefit of the regional economy, and
generates about 4 pence in every pound of Liverpool’s economic output per
head of population. Since 2003, LJMU graduates have started over 40 companies.
Student Access: Under the Government fair access initiative two-thirds of students are eligible
for LJMU bursaries, of which 65% come from low income households. The University was accredited by the
Frank Buttle Trust in recognition of its record of providing higher education to young people leaving social care.
In 2009, the University received an endowment of £260,000 from Yoko Ono, widow of John Lennon who was
a student at a predecessor institution to LJMU, to continue this work.
The University also provides funds to support students experiencing financial hardship and is part of an
initiative set up by the Financial Services Authority to improve the financial management/awareness of students.
The University provides a range of personal support services to its students, such as
guidance and advice on essential academic and personal skills, individual teaching and
learning plans for students with a declared disability, and student counselling.
35
Excellence: LJMU has been using the principles of Business Excellence since 1997,when the University became EFQM Member. LJMU has been actively using the EFQMExcellence as the basis for its management system since 2002. LJMU won the UKExcellence Award in October 2008 and were Finalists in the EFQM (European level)Excellence Award in 2009 and 2010, going on to be announced as a Prize Winner in thecategory of ‘Building Partnerships’ at the awards ceremony in Munich in October 2011.
LJMU continues to offer public benefits under the terms and guidance of the
Charity Commission, to students, staff, the local community and wider society by
way of a number of activities and initiatives:
Responsible Employer: LJMU was the first University ever to achieve the Investors inPeople Work Life Balance recognition, features in the 2011 Stonewall 100 list of Britain’s topemployers for lesbian, gay and bisexual staff, and has recently been awarded the Migrant WorkersCharter Certificate.
LJMU has invested in a ground breaking partnership with Liverpool City Council toprovide all students and staff with free access to the City Council’s Lifestyles fitnesscentres, thus encouraging students and staff to adopt a healthy lifestyle.
Trading with Integrity: As one of the largest employers in the Greater
Merseyside region, LJMU continues to develop its approach to ethical trading. This is done
through the purchase of Fairtrade goods where possible and appropriate, balancing always
the benefits of developing educational opportunities for the citizens of the world with a
careful consideration of the political, ethical and human rights records of the governments
of those countries in which LJMU operates or recruits students.
Community: As a major employer in the region, with some 2,500 staff and 25,000
students in Liverpool, LJMU contributes significantly to the local economy. The University is
mindful of its obligations to be a good neighbour, and engages frequently with the Local
Authority and community groups to consult on the impact of LJMU operations. This
includes an imaginative partnership with the Liverpool Students’ Union through which
student community representatives help to manage the relationship between local residents
and the student population. There is also a staff and student volunteering scheme, which
helps teams of LJMU people to work on valuable projects for the benefit of the community.
36
LJMU takes an active role in supporting the region, with many LJMU staff taking roles in
local companies, agencies, arts groups, charities, schools and colleges, thereby contributing
to economic growth, as well as the social and cultural wellbeing of the region.
LJMU’s World of Work (WoW®) is a strategic employability initiative thatengages hundreds of local employers and provides the City/Regional economywith a graduate talent pipeline that produces talented workers who have theskills employers are looking for. Business and other employers, (international,national and local) work with the University through visiting lectures, work-basedopportunities and assessing and certifying the skills students have developed.
As a flag-ship of LJMU’s community engagement, the Roscoe Foundation for Citizenship
promotes good citizenship amongst the young people in the Greater Merseyside region. More
than 900 schools are engaged in the scheme, to promote good citizenship to school children by
making awards to role models in society. The Foundation also runs the prestigious Roscoe
Lecture series, securing high profile speakers from the national and international community to
present thought-provoking public lectures that are free and open to the community in the
North West. Audiences typically number over 1,000 (and sometimes reach 2,500) and tickets
are free of charge. Speakers have included notable people from the fields of national and
international politics and diplomacy, academe, religion and belief, journalism and entertainment.
LJMU’s academic activity also has many public benefits. For example, LJMU’s world-leading
Astrophysics Research Institute owns and operates the World’s largest and most sophisticated
Robotic Telescope, based in the Canary Islands, and time on this telescope is made available to
the National Schools' Observatory alongside its function as a National Facility for research.
The LJMU-led project in turn brings leading edge astronomy into British classrooms in over
1,000 schools in order to stimulate and enhance young peoples’ enthusiasm for science and
technology. The Institute also helped found, and continues to provide knowledge input to
‘Spaceport’, a locally based major tourist attraction, owned by Mersey Travel.
Sustainable Environment: Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) has long
recognised the importance of sustainability and it is integral to the University’s Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR) agenda. For many years, LJMU has demonstrated best practice within the
Higher Education sector across a wide range of sustainability activities. These include:
n Reducing LJMU’s adverse impact on the environment
n Being a positive force in Liverpool and the wider community
n Being a responsible employer and a trusted and ethical trading partner
n Striving for continuous environmental improvement throughout all staff and student activities
37
In 2007 the University established a sustainability web site and a Sustainability Facilitators
Group. The aims of the group are to assist in implementing the Environmental Policy by
raising awareness and assist in minimising the university’s impact on the environment.
The group of volunteers comprises of representatives of staff and students.
The LJMU estate portfolio includes a wide range of buildings of various ages, type, andconstruction within the vibrant city of Liverpool. The three main campus areas consistof over 45 buildings, 24,500 students and 2,500 staff. Our operations have a local,national and global environment impact. The role of sustainability is to reduce thisimpact through an extensive programme of environmental improvements and carbonreduction initiatives that impact on all activities and stakeholders across the institution.
LJMU also won the Best Travel Plan Award in 2007 from Merseyside Integrated Transport Authority for its work in
promoting sustainable travel choices. Work on these plans has continued and the results of the 2009 Travel Survey
showed reductions in single car occupancy rates between 2005 and 2009 (16% for staff and 7% for students).
LJMU is currently participating in the Carbon Trust’s Higher Education Carbon Management Programme (Phase 5
2009/10). LJMU has already gained accreditation from the Carbon Trust Energy Efficiency Scheme (2007) and was
awarded the Carbon Trust Standard in 2009. LJMU has a successful Waste and Recycling programme, a PRINT
strategy to reduce paper and energy consumption, a Sustainable Procurement Policy and has Fairtrade status. These
improvements are consolidated into LJMU’s Carbon Management Plan, which addresses the need to conserve
energy and water, save money, maintain finite resources for longer and contribute towards reducing climate change.
LJMU also won the Best Travel Plan Award in 2007 from Merseyside Integrated Transport Authority for its work in
promoting sustainable travel choices. Work on these plans has continued and the results of the 2009 Travel Survey
showed reductions in single car occupancy rates between 2005 and 2009 (16% for staff and 7% for students).
LJMU is currently participating in the Carbon Trust’s Higher Education Carbon Management Programme (Phase 5
2009/10). LJMU has already gained accreditation from the Carbon Trust Energy Efficiency Scheme (2007) and was
awarded the Carbon Trust Standard in 2009. LJMU has a successful Waste and Recycling programme, a PRINT
strategy to reduce paper and energy consumption, a Sustainable Procurement Policy and has Fairtrade status. These
improvements are consolidated into LJMU’s Carbon Management Plan, which addresses the need to conserve
energy and water, save money, maintain finite resources for longer and contribute towards reducing climate change.
The Carbon Management Plan brings together policies into a cohesive framework with ongoing
rolling targets. The targets seek to exceed existing governmental targets. The Carbon Management
Plan acts as the catalyst for driving forward further improvements and cultural change across the
University, demonstrating LJMU’s commitment to becoming a low carbon university. In addition,
LJMU is currently moving towards ISO14001 accreditation via the nationally recognised EcoCampus
scheme and the development of an Environmental Management System.
38
The initial target was a 25% reduction in carbon emissions against abaseline year of 2008/09 over a period of five years to 2013/2014.
The CMP is a rolling programme of initiatives and a further year has been added to
the plan which has increased the target from 25% by 2013/14 to 32% by 2014/15.
This continues to move our target closer to the government’s targets of a 34%
reduction by 2020 and 80% reduction by 2050.
LJMU received a First Class Honours in the People and Planet Green League table,
with a rating of 31st out of 142 universities. This was a move up from the previous
year’s award of a 2:1 and the highest rating of all the Liverpool-based universities.
LJMU works closely with the Liverpool Students Union(LiverpoolSU) with regards to all sustainability issues and assistedthem in gaining their Silver Award in the environmental SoundImpact Awards in 2010. This work is ongoing and being furtherdeveloped through the Getting Greener campaign.
The University achieved its Bronze EcoCampus award in
April 2011 just 6 months after registering on the scheme.
This completed the planning stage of the phased approach
towards ISO14001 (Platinum Stage) and a fully developed
Environmental Management System.
The Carbon Management Plan (CMP) was approved by the Strategic Management
Group and the Board of Governors in March 2010. This demonstrates the senior
level of commitment and monitoring. The main objectives of the Plan are to
establish a strategic implementation of carbon reduction measures and embed
awareness into all processes and practices.
39
board of governorsThe University is an independent Higher Education Corporation whose
authority derives from the Education Reform Act 1988, and the Further
and Higher Education Act 1992.
The Board of Governors derive their authority from the University’s
Instrument and Articles of Government which was approved by the Privy
Council on 5 March 1993, and revised in 1995 and 2002.
The Instrument and Articles of Government states that the Board shall
consist of not less than twelve and not more than twenty-four appointed
members. The Board must decide what size it wishes to be. The Board
currently consists of twenty members, of whom up to thirteen would be
independent members, one nominee each from the Academic Board and
students, two staff governors and two co-opted members. The
membership of the Board is completed by the Vice Chancellor, who is the
Chief Executive.
In the period from 1 August 2010 membership of the Board of Governors
has been as follows: -
40
Ex-officio Members
Professor M A Brown Vice Chancellor & Chief Executive
(Retired 31st August 2011)
Professor Vice Chancellor & Chief ExecutiveNigel Weatherill (Appointed 1st September 2011)
External Independent Members
Sir M Thornton Chairman and Pro ChancellorChairman of Remuneration CommitteeChairman of Nominations CommitteeFinal term extended upon approval of the Board on 20th September 2010
Ms K Byrne
Mr J Carson
Ms C Dove Re-appointed 1 August 2010
Sir J Dwyer Retired 11 September 2011
Sir D Henshaw
Mr R Hill Chairman of Finance Committee
Mr A Holroyd
Sir B Massie Re-appointed 1 February 2011
Mr G Morris Deputy Chairman Finance Committee
Mrs A Redmond Deputy Chairman Audit Committee
Ms D Shackleton Chairman of Audit Committee
Judge Elizabeth Steel Chairman of Employment CommitteeFinal term extended upon approval of the Board on 20 September 2010
External Co-opted Members
Mr A Bell Co-opted Governor from Health Sector
Mr P Holme Co-opted Governor from Education Sector Deputy Chairman of Employment Committee
Nominee Members
Ms K Johnston Staff Governor (Academic Board Nominee)(Retired 17 April 2011)
Ms L Rumsey Student Governor (Student President)(Retired 13 June 2011)
Dr T Livsey Staff Governor (Academic Board Nominee) Appointed 18 April 2011
Mr D McCabe Student Governor (Student President)Elected 27 June 2011
Staff Members
Mr M Grayshon Staff Governor (Non Teaching Staff)Retired 25 September 2011
Professor P Lisboa Staff Governor (Teaching Staff)
The Board of Governors are the Trustees of the University.
officers and advisors of the universityVice-Chancellor and Chief Executive: Professor Michael Brown (retired 31st August 2011)
Professor Nigel Weatherill (appointed 1st September 2011)
Bankers: Barclays Bank plc, 6th Floor, 1 Marsden Street, Manchester M2 1HW
External Auditors: KPMG LLP, St James’ Square, Manchester M2 6DS
Solicitors: Davies Wallis Foyster, 5 St Pauls Square, Old Hall Street, Liverpool L3 9AE
Internal Auditors: Deloitte & Touche LLP, Horton House, Exchange Flags, Liverpool L2 3PG
41
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
OF LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY
In accordance with the Education Reform Act 1988, the Board of Governors of the University is responsible for the administration andmanagement of the affairs of the University and is required to present audited financial statements for each financial year.
The Board of Governors is responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financialposition of the University, and to enable it to ensure that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the Education Reform Act,the Statement of Recommended Practice on Accounting for Further and Higher Education Institutions and relevant Accounting Standards. Inaddition, within the terms and conditions of a Financial Memorandum agreed between the Higher Education Funding Council for England andthe Board of Governors of the University, the Board of Governors, through its designated office holder, is required to prepare financialstatements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the University and of the surplus or deficit and cashflows for that year.
In causing the financial statements to be prepared, the Board has ensured that:
n Suitable accounting policies are selected and applied consistently.
n Judgements and estimates are made that are reasonable and prudent.
n Applicable accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements.
n Financial statements are prepared on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the University will continue inoperation. The Board is satisfied that the University has adequate resources to continue in operation for the foreseeable future; for thisreason the going concern basis continues to be adopted in the preparation of the financial statements.
The Board has taken reasonable steps to:
n Ensure that funds from the Higher Education Funding Council for England and the Training and Development Agency are used only for thepurposes for which they have been given and in accordance with the Financial Memorandum with the relevant Funding Council and anyother conditions which the Funding Council may from time to time prescribe.
n Ensure that there are appropriate financial and management controls in place to safeguard public funds and funds from other sources.
n Safeguard the assets of the University and prevent and detect fraud.
n Secure the economical, efficient and effective management of the University's resources and expenditure.
Sir M Thornton
Chairman
21 November 2011
42
43
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The University is committed to adopting good practice in all aspects of
corporate governance. It aims to conduct its business in accordance with
the principles identified in the Committee on Standards in Public Life
(selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and
leadership) and the Committee of University Chairmen (CUC) Guide for
Members of Higher Education Governing Bodies in the UK, known as the
Combined Code. The Board of Governors has adopted the CUC’s
Governance Code of Practice and works to ensure that governance
practice remains consistent with the principles of the Code. The Combined
Code was superseded by the UK Corporate Governance Code in May
2010 and applies to year ends beginning on or after 29 June 2010.
Therefore the new Code is applicable to the higher education (HE) sector
for the first time for the year ended 31 July 2011. The Board of Governors
has considered the new Code and how this applies to the University.
Summary of the University’s Structure of Corporate
Governance
The University is an exempt charity and as such is required to undertake
activities which are in accordance with its aims and objectives and which
are for the public benefit. The University has had regard to the Charity
Commission’s guidance on public benefit, and information on how the
University has delivered its charitable purposes for the public benefit is set
out on page 32.
The University’s Board of Governors comprises lay, academic, student and
other staff persons appointed under the provisions of the Education
Reform Act 1988, the majority of whom are independent and non-
executive. The composition of the Board of Governors is set out on page
41. The role of Chairman of the Board of Governors is separate from the
role of the University’s Chief Executive, the Vice Chancellor. The matters
reserved specifically to the Board of Governors for decision are set out in
the Articles of Government of the University, the Scheme of Delegation
and under the Financial Memorandum (FM) with the Funding Council for
England (HEFCE).
The Board of Governors holds to itself the responsibilities for the educational
character, the ongoing strategic direction and the financial solvency of the
University. The Board, in addition to its formal Board and Committee
meetings, holds a number of strategic workshops and a residential strategic
event each year, affording it the opportunity to influence strategic issues at an
early stage in their development. The Board is also responsible for approval
of major developments, including property developments, and is in receipt
of regular reports from Executive Officers on the day-to-day operations of
the University’s business and its subsidiary companies.
The Board of Governors has a strong and independent non-executive
element and no individual or group dominates its decision-making process.
The Board is independent of management and free from any business or
other relationship which could materially interfere with the exercise of its
independent judgement.
Upon commencing appointment, Governors are required to declare any
pecuniary, family or other personal interest, direct or indirect, and this is
noted in the Register of Members’ Interests. Governors are expected to
update their entry at any time as and when their circumstances change
and the University conducts an annual update in accordance with the
recommendations of the CUC. The Registers of Interests for both the
Board and University’s Senior Management are published on the
University website. Upon appointment, Governors are also required to
sign a statement of confidentiality.
In accordance with the introduction of the new Bribery Act 2010 the
Governors have taken responsibility for establishing an anti-corruption
culture formulated around the six general principles of: Proportionate
procedures; Top-level commitment; Risk Assessment; Due diligence;
Communication (including training); and Monitoring and review.
A statement of commitment from the Chairman of the Board of
Governors outlines that the Board of Governors expects that all staff,
associates and agents will conduct business in accordance with the highest
standards of ethical behaviour and that any bribery, or any form of
corruption, by a member of staff of the University will be considered gross
misconduct and the member of staff may face dismissal. Agents,
consultants and business partners who work with, or on behalf of the
University, must act with integrity and behave ethically. The University will
terminate agreements with such agents, consultants and business partners
in the event of any breach of anti-bribery law, corruption or unethical
behaviour.
The Board of Governors meets a minimum of four times a year and has
several Committees: a Finance Committee; an Employment Committee;
a Remuneration Committee; a Nominations Committee and an Audit
Committee. All of these Committees are formally constituted with terms
of reference and comprise lay members of the Board of Governors. The
Chairman is not a member of the Audit Committee and there is no
overlap in membership of the Audit and Finance Committees. The Vice-
Chancellor is not a member of the Audit Committee and attends that
Committee in his capacity of Chief Executive. The Board of Governors
and its Committees review their terms of reference on a regular basis
with a view, inter alia, to ensuring that they are embedding risk effectively
into their work. In addition to its formal meetings, the Board holds
workshops and a residential strategic event during the year, at which items
of strategic importance are disclosed. The Chairman of the Board of
Governors is Sir Malcolm Thornton. The full Board of Governors met on
44
20 September 2010, 11 October 2010 (Governors Workshop), 22
November 2010, 6 December 2010, 10 January 2011 (Networking
Event), 26 and 27 January 2011 (Overnight Strategic Event), 14 February
2011, 28 March 2011 and 4 July 2011.
The Finance Committee meets at least three times a year and
recommends to the Board of Governors the University’s annual revenue
and capital budgets after giving consideration to the financial health of the
University. It also receives at each meeting reports on the University’s
performance in relation to approved budgets, estate related capital
investment plans and treasury management. The Chairman of the Finance
Committee is Mr Rod Hill and the Deputy Chairman is Mr Graham
Morris. The Finance Committee met on 8 November 2010, 14 March
2011, and 20 June 2011.
The Employment Committee meets at least 4 times a year and considers
issues related to staffing and employment in the University. The
responsibilities of the Committee also encompass equality and diversity
monitoring and the regulatory aspects of the University’s relationship with
the student body. The Chairman of the Employment Committee is Her
Honour E Steel DL and the Deputy Chairman is Mr Paul Holme. The
Employment Committee met on 23 September 2010, 18 October 2010,
14 February 2011, 7 March 2011 and 6 June 2011.
The Remuneration Committee, which meets at least once a year,
considers the performance and determines the annual remuneration of
the Vice Chancellor and Senior Officers of the University. The Chairman
of the Remuneration Committee is Sir Malcolm Thornton. The
Remuneration Committee met on 9 February 2011 and 9 March 2011.
The Nominations Committee meets at least once a year, more regularly
if necessary, and considers membership issues and appointments to
vacancies on the Board for non-executive members. The Committee also
advises the Board of Governors of attendance statistics on an annual basis
and supports any necessary intervention that the Chairman of the Board
should make in instances of low attendance. Issues around attendance are
discussed by the Chairmen of Committees as part of performance review
meetings with individual Governors. The Chairman of the Nominations
Committee is Sir Malcolm Thornton. The Nominations Committee met
on 16 September 2010.
The Audit Committee, which meets at least four times a year, is
responsible for overseeing the work of the external auditors and internal
auditors and considers detailed reports together with recommendations
for the improvement of the University’s systems of internal control and
management’s responses and implementation plans. The Committee also
receives and considers reports from HEFCE as they affect the University’s
business, monitors adherence with the regulatory requirements and
reviews the University’s accounting policies. Whilst the Vice-Chancellor
and other managers attend meetings of the Audit Committee as
necessary, they are not members of the Committee. The Committee is
empowered to meet any auditors on their own for independent
discussions should this be decided to be necessary by either party. In
2010 the Terms of Reference for the Audit Committee were reviewed
and amended to take account of the new requirements within the FM for
regulation under the Charities Act 2006 and its specific implications for the
work and responsibilities of the Audit Committee. The FM sets out the
formal relationship HEFCE and the governing bodies and designated
officers of higher education institutions (HEIs) it funds. It reflects HEFCE’s
responsibility to provide annual assurances to Parliament that: Funds are
being used for the purposes for which they were given; risk management,
control and governance in the sector are effective; and value for money
is being achieved. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is Ms Deborah
Shackleton and the Deputy Chairman is Mrs Alexis Redmond. The Audit
Committee met on 4 October 2010, 1 November 2010, 21 February
2011, 13 June 2011 and 18 July 2011.
In the opinion of the Board of Governors, the governance practices of the
University are consistent with the “Guide for Membership of Higher
Education Governing Bodies in the UK”, published by the CUC in
February 2009, and superseded by the UK Corporate Governance Code
in May 2010, with the following exception: that in light of the
unprecedented challenge in the HE sector, it is clearly of fundamental
importance that the Board should ensure continuity, stability and
continuing effective governance, and this need was heightened
exceptionally at LJMU when, during the same period, the critically
important succession to the position of Vice Chancellor and Chief
Executive took place. In this respect, therefore, it was agreed at the Board
of Governors Meeting on 20 September 2010 that the University’s 7
most experienced Governors, (which included the Chairman), defined as
those serving in their (final) third term as at 1 September 2010, would be
extended in office by 2 years from the date when their individual term of
office normally would have concluded. Without this action 3 of the
Governors would have completed their final term before 31 July 2011.
The Board of Governors approved the appointment of the new Vice-
Chancellor and Chief Executive at its meeting held on 14 February 2011
and he took up post on 1 September 2011.
During 2009 the Board of Governors conducted an in-depth review of
the effectiveness of institutional governance arrangements of the
University. Such an intensive improvement review is conducted every 4
years with any actions/enhancements implemented in the meantime and
as and when the need arises. The review determined that there continues
to be a high level of satisfaction within the Board of Governors and the
Executive with the current governance arrangements within the University,
alongside a commitment to self-evaluation and continuous improvement.
The recommendations arising from the review were implemented during
2009/10. The Board recognises that the maintenance of good corporate
45
governance arrangements is an ongoing process and a programme of
governance work was undertaken in 2010/11, in addition to the
implementation of the recommendations of the Governance Effectiveness
Review. 2010/11 saw an exceptionally busy year for Governors during a
period of great change for the HE sector with particular reference to the
external environment, including the decision on fees and the access
agreement.
Internal Control
The University’s Board of Governors is responsible for the University’s
system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. Such a
system is designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to
achieve policies, aims and objectives; it can therefore only provide
reasonable and not absolute assurance of effectiveness. It is based on a
framework of regular management information, administrative procedures
including the segregation of duties, and a system of delegation and
accountability.
The system of internal control is based on an ongoing risk management
process designed to identify the principal risks to the achievement of the
organisation’s objectives; to evaluate the nature and extent of those risks,
and to manage them efficiently, effectively and economically. It is
underpinned by compliance with the requirements of the core standards:
n Governance
n Financial Management
n Risk Management
Processes and control arrangements:
The University has the following processes in place:
1. The University remains committed to best practice in Governance
and Management. In 2002 the University adopted the EFQM
Excellence Model Framework and a strong strategy is in place, based
on the core business processes of Student Recruitment;
Development and Support; Learning, Teaching and Assessment;
Research and Scholarship; and Commercial Enterprise and
Knowledge Transfer. The Strategic Management Group (SMG)
continues to test the strength of its management system through
both internal and external award assessment.
2. The Strategic Management System ensures a regular review of the
University’s strategic direction. This has been reviewed over the last
18 months in response to the change of HE funding policy under the
coalition government and a new strategic plan for the period 2012
to 2017 is in preparation.
3. The Board of Governors and its Committees review their terms of
reference on a regular basis with a view, inter alia, to agreeing how
best to embed risk assessment activity into their work. The terms of
reference for the Audit Committee were reviewed and amended in
November 2010 to take into account the new reporting
requirements within HEFCE’s Financial Memorandum for regulations
under the Charities Act 2006.
4. The Board of Governors’ agenda includes a regular item for
consideration of risk. The Board receives reports on risk and the
Enterprise Risk Management arrangements from SMG and the Audit
Committee.
5. The Internal Audit Plan is derived from a high level risk assessment of
the University’s operations in consultation with University management
and the assessment makes detailed reference to the University Strategic
Plan, risk register and previous internal audit reports.
6. SMG, the Audit Committee and the Board of Governors receive
regular reports from internal audit, which include recommendations
for improvement. The Internal Auditors, who operate to the
standards defined in the HEFCE Accountability and Audit Code of
Practice, submit regular reports including independent opinion on
the adequacy and effectiveness of the system of internal control, with
recommendations for improvement.
7. SMG receives reports setting out key risk indicators and considers
possible control issues brought to its attention by early warning
mechanisms, which are embedded within the operational units and
reinforced by risk awareness training.
8. All SMG members included a section on identification, evaluation and
management of risk areas in their monthly reports to the Vice-
Chancellor during 2010/2011.
9. Risk management is incorporated into the corporate planning and
decision making process of the institution. The Enterprise Risk
Management Strategy contains a description of the institution’s risk
appetite, reflecting informal advice from the University’s internal
auditors.
10. The Risk Moderation Panel has formal terms of reference as a
working group of SMG. A combination of core and rotating
membership ensures consistency whilst at the same time as allowing
fresh perspectives on risk issues.
11. The Institutional Risk Register is reviewed on a regular basis and
procedures for identifying risks refined.
12. The principles of PRINCE2 methodology are applied in the
management of institutional projects.
46
Particular indicators of the effectiveness of the internal
control systems during 2010/11
These include:
1. The overall assessment from the HEFCE Assessment of Institutional
Risk, dated 3 June 2011, is that LJMU is not at higher risk and is
meeting the accountability obligations set out in the Financial
Memorandum between HEFCE and Institutions.
2. A UK Excellence Award winner in 2008, the University has also been
a finalist in the EFQM (European level) Excellence Award in 2009
and 2010, going on to be announced as a Prize Winner in the
category of ‘Building Partnerships’ at the awards ceremony in Munich
in October 2011. This ongoing achievement of high-level external
recognition represents a positive independent assessment of the
University’s approach to governance and management.
3. The most recent annual assessment statement by the Internal
Auditors of the University’s system of internal control, including risk
management and governance concludes that ‘Liverpool John Moores
University has a basically sound system of internal controls, which
should provide substantial assurance regarding the effective
achievement of the University’s objectives’.
4. Assessment gradings for all audits in 2010/11 were either full or
substantial. A review by the Internal Auditors into ‘Information for
Decision Making’ focussed on information required by Governors to
discharge their roles and responsibilities, with specific attention to
decision making in the current climate and assessing whether the
information currently provided is timely, accurate and appropriate to
facilitate an informed and efficient decision making process. This
review, together with a review of Performance Management KPIs,
received a full assessment grading.
5. The Carbon Management Project Board received the first year
report, for 2009/10, on progress with the Carbon Management
Programme (CMP). This showed that the potential to save carbon
amounting to 45% of the five years 25% target has been identified and
may be realised through the projects completed within the
programme’s first year. The Project Board reports to SMG and to the
Board of Governors or its Committees because of the importance
of the CMP and in accordance with requirements of the HEFCE
Financial Memorandum and HEFCE Good Practice Guidance
2010/12 on Carbon Management strategies and plans.
6. An Anti-Bribery Policy was agreed by the Board of Governors on 28
March. A Working Group has been established to identify high risk
areas and to prepare plans for implementing the policy. References
to the Bribery Act 2010 have been included in documents and
policies and a programme of communication about the Act has been
finalised ready for delivery in autumn 2011. In addition, Internal Audit
ran a workshop on identifying fraud risks. A further workshop in
2011/12 will help to consolidate a comprehensive framework of
counter-fraud and anti-corruption arrangements.
7. The University has met the reporting requirements of both the
Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act for the
requests received.
8. Liverpool John Moores University continues to manage its health and
safety risks effectively and further consolidated its statutory
occupational health provision for staff and students, having made
significant progress against the targets contained in the LJMU Health
and Safety Action Plan 2010/11. The University’s insurer concluded
in its audit report that there has been an improvement in health and
safety management since its previous visit in 2009. There was a slight
increase in the total number of workplace accidents resulting in minor
injuries. However, the number of accidents that were reported to the
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) fell, along with the corresponding
staff incidence rates (used by HSE as an indicator of an organisation’s
Health and Safety performance).
9. There has been continued low referral of cases to the Office of the
Independent Adjudicator in relation to student complaints and
appeals.
10. Planning and Information (PLN) have put in place a policy that all
requests for software solutions and developments are to be
submitted to the PLN Service Desk and where appropriate go with
a business case to the Development Programme Steering Group
(DPSG) for consideration.
11. A P2P (Procure to Pay) project has introduced an e-marketplace
system: i-procurement and i-buy. Two faculties are the pilot areas for
the system that improves the efficiency of purchasing, receipting and
invoice matching, relies upon workflow processes and strengthens
controls.
12. The Audit Committee conducted a self assessment. The undertaking
of the self assessment is a demonstration that the Committee is
committed to ensuring that it is continuing to fulfil its obligations as
set out in its Terms of Reference and continuing to find ways of
enhancing its effectiveness.
The Board is of the view that there is an ongoing process for identifying,
evaluating and managing the University’s significant risks, that it has been
in place for the year ended 31 July 2011, that it is regularly reviewed by
the Board of Governors and that it accords with the internal control
guidance for directors on the Combined Code as deemed appropriate
for HE.
47
Going Concern
After making appropriate enquiries, the Board of Governors considers
that the University has adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason the Board continues
to adopt the ‘going concern’ basis in preparing the financial statements.
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Board of Governors of
Liverpool John Moores University
We have audited the group and University financial statements (the
‘‘financial statements’’) of Liverpool John Moores University for the year
ended 31 July 2011 which comprise the Group Income and Expenditure
Account, the Group and University Balance Sheets, the Group Cash Flow
Statement, the Group Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses
and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been
applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom
Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice).
This report is made solely to the Board of Governors, in accordance with
paragraph 13(2) of the University's Articles of Government and section
124B of the Education Reform Act 1988. Our audit work has been
undertaken so that we might state to the Board of Governors those
matters we are required to state to it in an auditor’s report and for no
other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept
or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Board of Governors for
our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of the Board of Governors
and auditor
As explained more fully in the Statement of Responsibilities the Board of
Governors on page x the Board of Governors is responsible for the
preparation of financial statements which give a true and fair view. Our
responsibility is to audit, and express an opinion, on the financial statements
in accordance with applicable law and International Standards on Auditing
(UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing
Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors.
Scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the
financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused
by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the groups and University’s circumstances and
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the Board of
Governors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements. In
addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the
Operating and Financial Review to identify material inconsistencies with
the audited financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent
material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications
for our report.
Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the financial statements:
n give a true and fair view of the state of the affairs of the Group andUniversity as at 31 July 2011 and of the Group’s income andexpenditure, recognised gains and losses and cash flows for the yearthen ended;
n have been properly prepared in accordance with United KingdomGenerally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
n have been prepared in accordance with the Statement ofRecommended Practice – Accounting for Further and HigherEducation.
Opinion on other matters prescribed in the HEFCE Audit
Code of Practice issued under the Further and Higher
Education Act 1992
In our opinion, in all material respects:
n funds from whatever source administered by the University forspecific purposes have been properly applied to those purposes
n funds provided by HEFCE have been applied in accordance withthe Financial Memorandum and any other terms and conditionsattached to them.
48
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matter where the HEFCE Audit Code of Practice issued under the Further and Higher Education
Act 1992 requires us to report to you if, in our opinion:
n the statement of internal control included as part of the Corporate Governance Statement is inconsistent with our knowledge of the Universityand group.
Stephen Clark
For and on behalf of KPMG LLP, Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants
St James’ Square
Manchester
M2 6DS
Date: 28th November 2011
The maintenance and integrity of the Liverpool John Moores University website is the responsibility of the Board of Governors; the work carried out
by the auditors does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have
occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the website.
Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
49
STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of preparation
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with thestatement of recommended practice (SORP – 2007): Accounting forFurther and Higher Education Institutions and in accordance withapplicable accounting standards.
Basis of accounting
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical costconvention, modified by the revaluation of certain land and buildings.
Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the University and itssubsidiary undertakings for the financial year to 31 July 2011. Intra-group sales and purchases are eliminated fully on consolidation. Inaccordance with FRS2, the activities of the Students Union have notbeen consolidated because the University does not control nor havesignificant influence over their managerial and financial policy decisions.
Recognition of income
Income from research grants, contracts and other services rendered isincluded to the extent of the completion of the contract or serviceconcerned. This is generally equivalent to the sum of the relevantexpenditure incurred during the year and any related contributionstowards overhead costs. All income from short-term deposits iscredited to the income and expenditure account in the period in whichit is earned.
Income from specific endowments and donations is included to theextent of the relevant expenditure incurred during the year, togetherwith any related contributions towards overhead costs.
Recurrent grants from the Funding Council are recognised in theperiod in which they are receivable.
Non-recurrent grants from Funding Council or other bodies receivedin respect of the acquisition or construction of fixed assets are treatedas deferred capital grants and amortised in line with depreciation overthe life of the assets.
Pension schemes
The three pension schemes for the University's staff are the TeachersPension Scheme (TPS), Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) andthe Merseyside Pension Fund (MPF). The schemes are defined benefitschemes, which are externally funded and contracted out of the StateEarnings-Related Pension Scheme. The Funds are valued every fiveyears (TPS) by actuaries using the entry age method, or three years(MPF and USS) by actuaries using the projected unit method, the ratesof contribution payable being determined by the trustees on the adviceof the actuaries. Pension costs are assessed on the latest actuarialvaluations of the Schemes and are accounted for on the basis ofcharging the cost of providing pensions over the period during whichthe institution benefits from the employees' services. Variations fromregular cost are spread over the expected average remaining workinglifetime of Members of the Schemes after making allowances for futurewithdrawals.
Tangible fixed assets
a. Land and buildings
Land and Buildings are stated at valuation. The basis of valuation iseither open market value for existing use or depreciatedreplacement cost. CB Richard Ellis, Chartered Surveyors, revaluedthe freehold and leasehold land and buildings at 30 June 2010.Valuations normally take place every 5 years. Freehold land is notdepreciated. Buildings are depreciated over their expected usefullives of 50 years and leasehold buildings over the life of the lease.Assets in the course of construction are not depreciated.
Where buildings are acquired with the aid of specific grants they arecapitalised and depreciated as above. The related grants are treatedas deferred capital grants and released to income over the expecteduseful life of the buildings.
b. Maintenance of premises
The cost of routine corrective maintenance is charged to the incomeand expenditure account in the period in which it is incurred.
c. Telescope
The Liverpool Telescope has been capitalised at cost and is beingdepreciated over 20 years.
50
d. Equipment
Equipment, including computers and software, costing less than£10,000 per individual item, or group of related items, is written offto the income and expenditure account in the year of acquisition. Allother equipment is capitalised at cost and depreciated over 4 years.
Where equipment is acquired with the aid of specific grants it iscapitalised and depreciated in accordance with the above policy, withthe related grant being credited to a deferred capital grant accountand released to the income and expenditure account over theexpected useful life of the equipment.
e. Leases
Fixed assets held under finance leases and the related lease obligationsare recorded in the balance sheet at the shorter of the fair value of theleased assets at the inception of the lease or the life of the asset asappropriate. The excess of lease payments over recorded leaseobligations is treated as finance charges, which are amortised over eachlease term to give a constant rate of charge on the remaining balanceof the obligations.
Rental costs under operating leases are charged to expenditure in equalannual amounts over the period of the leases.
Investments
Fixed asset investments that are not listed on a recognised stockexchange are carried at historical cost less any provision for impairmentin their value.
Current asset investments are included at the lower of their originalcost and net realisable value.
Stocks
Stocks are valued at the lower of their cost and net realisable value.Where necessary, provision is made for obsolete, slow moving anddefective stocks.
Taxation status
The University is considered to pass the tests set out in Paragraph 1Schedule 6 Finance Act 2010 and therefore it meets the definition ofa charitable company for UK corporation tax purposes. Accordingly,the University is potentially exempt from taxation in respect of incomeor capital gains received within categories covered by Chapter 3 Part11 Corporation Tax Act 2010 or Section 256 of the Taxation ofChargeable Gains Act 1992, to the extent that such income or gains areapplied exclusively to charitable purposes. Subsidiary companies areliable to corporation tax.The University is partially exempt in respect of Value Added Tax, sothat it can only recover a minor element of VAT charged on its inputs.Irrecoverable VAT on inputs is included in the costs of such inputs andadded to the cost of tangible fixed assets as appropriate, where theinputs themselves are tangible fixed assets by nature.
The University’s subsidiary companies with the exception of JMUBuilding Services and Maintenance Ltd (which has the same taxationstatus as the University) are subject to corporation tax and VAT in thesame way as any commercial organisation.
Cash flows and liquid resources
Liquid resources include sums on short-term deposits with recognisedbanks and building societies and government securities.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the University has a present legal orconstructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that atransfer of economic benefit will be required to settle the obligationand a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT For the year ended 31 July 2011
Note 2010/11 2009/10 £000 £000 Income Funding council grants Tuition fees and education contracts Research grants and contracts Other income Endowment and Investment income
1 2 3 4 5
78,192 74,809 10,320 12,661
285
82,173 73,181 12,509 10,907
201
Total income
176,267 178,971
Expenditure Staff costs Other operating expenses Depreciation Impairment Interest payable
6 8
12 11
7
101,984 52,957
7,877 -
4,452
107,881 54,282
7,578 1,492 5,439
Total expenditure
8
167,270
176,672
Surplus after depreciation of tangible fixed assets at valuation and before tax Loss on disposal of fixed assets
12
8,997
-
2,299
(3,114)
Surplus/(Deficit) after depreciation of tangible fixed assets at valuation and disposal of fixed assets and before tax Share of operating profit in Associates Taxation
9
8,997
15
-
(815)
58
-
Surplus/(Deficit) before exceptional items Fundamental Restructuring Costs
10
9,012
-
(757)
(8,009)
Surplus/(Deficit) after depreciation of tangible fixed assets at valuation and tax Transferred from/(to) endowment funds
21
9,012
96
(8,766)
(153)
Surplus/(Deficit) for the year
23
9,108
(8,919)
The income and expenditure account has been prepared in respect of continuing operations.
financial statements 2
011
51
52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF HISTORICAL COST SURPLUSES AND DEFICITS For the year ended 31 July 2011 Note 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 Surplus/(Deficit) after depreciation of fixed assets at valuation and tax
9,108
(8,919)
Difference between historical cost depreciation charge and the actual depreciation charge for the year calculated on the revalued amount Realisation of property revaluation gains of previous years on disposal of assets
22
22
730
-
751
2,988
Historical cost surplus/(deficit) for the period after tax
9,838
(5,180)
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
BALANCE SHEETS As at 31 July 2011 Note Group University
2011 2010 2011 2010 £000 £000
£000 £000
Fixed assets Tangible assets Investments Investment in associate: Share of net assets/(liabilities)
12 13
13
174,463
39
61
162,771
39
25
174,463
16,383
-
162,771
16,372
- 174,563 162,835 190,846 179,143 Endowment asset investments
14
1,979
1,646
1,979
1,646
Current assets Assets held for resale Stocks and work in progress Debtors Short-term deposits Cash at bank and in hand
12
15 18 18
1,081
51 9,108
32,128 5,253
-
45 11,460 27,854
2,710
1,081
49 8,786
32,128 4,851
-
40 10,800 27,854
1,923 47,621
42,069
46,895
40,617
Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year
16 38,734 41,450 37,744 39,753
Net current assets
8,887
619
9,151
864
Total assets less current liabilities 185,429 165,100 201,976 181,653
Creditors: Amounts falling due after more than one year
17
36,666
26,963 52,824 43,121
Provisions for liabilities and charges
19
14,996
17,323
14,996
17,323
Net assets excluding pension liability
133,767
120,814
134,156
121,209
Pension Scheme liability
27
(62,908)
(61,763)
(62,908)
(61,763)
Net assets including pension liability
70,859
59,051
71,248
59,446
Represented by: Deferred capital grants 20 32,609 31,958 32,609 31,958 Endowments Permanent Expendable
21 21
12
1,967
12
1,634
12
1,967
12
1,634
Total Endowments 1,979 1,646 1,979
1,646
Reserves
Income and Expenditure Account excluding pension reserve Pension Reserve
23
27
53,897
(62,908)
41,199
(61,763)
54,286
(62,908)
41,594
(61,763)
Income and Expenditure Account including pension reserve (9,011) (20,564) (8,622) (20,169)
Revaluation Reserve 22
45,282
46,011
45,282
46,011
Total Reserves
36,271
25,447
36,660
25,842
70,859
59,051
71,248
59,446
The financial statements on pages 21 to 45 were approved by the Board of Governors on 21 November 2011. Sir M Thornton Professor Nigel Weatherill Chairman Vice Chancellor & Chief Executive
53
financial statements 2
011
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT For the year ended 31 July 2011 Note 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 Net cash inflow from operating activities Returns on investments and servicing of finance Taxation Capital expenditure and financial investment
24
25
25
17,290
(1,813)
-
(18,256)
9,425
(1,395)
-
(17,930)
Cash outflow before use of liquid resources and financing
(2,779)
(9,900)
Management of liquid resources Financing Increase in cash in the year
25
25
(4,274)
9,807
(7,413)
19,462
2,754
2,149
Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 Increase in cash in the year Cash (outflow)/inflow from increase in debt and lease financing Cash inflow from movement in liquid resources
26
26
26
2,754
(9,807)
4,274
2,149
(19,462)
7,413
Change in net debt resulting from cash flows Non cash movement on Endowments
26
(2,779)
15
(9,900)
14
Movement in net debt for year 2011 Net debt at 1 August 2010
(2,764)
4,709
(9,886)
14,595
Net debt at 31 July 2011
26
1,945
4,709
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
54
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSES For the year ended 31 July 2011 Note 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 Surplus/(deficit) after depreciation of fixed assets at valuation and tax Endowment additions Endowment reclassification Actuarial gain/(loss) in respect of pension scheme Actuarial gain in respect of RPI to CPI adjustment * Unrealised surplus released on revaluation of assets
14 14 23 23 22
9,012
681 (252)
1,715 - -
(8,766)
130 -
(5,886) 12,324
8,983 Total recognised gains relating to the year
11,156
6,785
Reconciliation
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Opening reserves and endowments Total recognised gains in year
27,092
11,156
20,307
6,785
Closing reserves and endowments
38,248
27,092
* In its June 2010 budget, the government announced that it intended for future increases in public sector pension schemes to be linked to changes in the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rather than, as previously, the Retail Price Index (RPI). In the year ended 31st July 2010 the University considered the LGPS scheme rules and associated members’ literature and concluded that, as a result, a revised actuarial assumption about the level of inflation indexation should be made, with the resulting gain recognised through the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses (‘STRGL’) in the 2009/10 financial statements. Following the issue of Urgent Issues Task Force (‘UITF’) Abstract 48 in December 2010, the University has reconsidered its position in respect of the above and has concluded that the above treatment of the gain remains appropriate.
financial statements 2
011
55
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 1 Funding Council grants HEFCE
£000 TDA
£000
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Recurrent grant Specific grants Deferred capital grants released in year Buildings (note 20) Equipment (note 20)
67,020
3,301
837 982
5,061
979
- 12
72,081
4,280
837 994
74,617
5,429
753 1,374
72,140
6,052
78,192
82,173
2 Tuition fees and education contracts 2010/11 2009/10
£000 £000 Full-time students (UK and European Union) Full-time students charged overseas fees and other fees Part-time fees (UK and European Union) Other fees and NHS education contracts
49,253
8,988 2,533
14,035
47,600
9,038 2,942
13,601
74,809
73,181
3 Research grants and contracts 2010/11 2009/10 £000 £000 Research councils UK based charities Health & Hospitals Central and Local Government Other research grants and contracts
1,541
294 4,290 1,791 2,404
1,611
672 5,469 3,081 1,676
10,320
12,509
4 Other income 2010/11 2009/10
£000 £000
Residences and Catering Other Services rendered Released from deferred capital grant (note 20) Other Income
897
9,881 353
1,530
1,008 7,223
371 2,305
12,661
10,907
5 Endowment and Investment income 2010/11 2009/10 £000 £000 Income from expendable endowments Income from permanent endowments Income from short-term deposits
15
- 270
12
- 189
285
201
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
56
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2010 (continued) 6 Staff Costs 2010/11 2009/10 £000 £000 Salaries and wages Social security costs Pension costs (including FRS17 adjustment)
81,769
6,268 11,443
88,717
6,947 11,731
99,480 107,395 Severance: Restructuring costs 1,624 322
101,104 107,717 Pension costs relating to enhanced pension provision (note 19) 880 164
101,984
107,881
2010/11 £
2009/10
£ Emoluments of the Vice Chancellor Salary Benefits in kind
229,626 1,788
270,000 714
231,414
270,714
Pension contributions
25,380
38,070
The Vice Chancellor opted out of the Teacher’s Pension Scheme as at 31st March 2011. From 1 April 2011 to 31 July 2011 he chose to take a reduced salary. The average number of persons employed by the University during the year as expressed in full time equivalents was:
2010/11 Number
2009/10 Number
Academic Support Other
1,002 1,130
166
1,055 1,234
176
2,298
2,465
2010/11 Number
2009/10 Number
Remuneration of higher paid staff other than the Vice Chancellor, excluding pension contributions: £100,000 - £109,999 £110,000 - £119,999 £120,000 - £129,999 £130,000 - £139,999 £140,000 - £149,999 £150,000 - £159,999
3 3 2 - 4 6
2 1 3 1 7 4
financial statements 2
011
57
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 7 Interest payable 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 On bank loans, overdraft and other loans:
Wholly repayable within five years Not wholly repayable within five years
Interest on VAT Assessment
3
2,093 2
32 1,541
-
FRS17 Adjustment: Net interest on pension liabilities (note 27)
2,098
2,354
1,573
3,866
4,452
5,439
8 Analysis of 2010/11 expenditure by activity
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Academic Academic services Research grants & contracts Residences & catering Premises Administration & central services General education Staff student facilities Other expenses
77,515 18,813
9,267 1,982
24,187 11,516 15,705
4,775 3,510
81,183 19,880 11,066
2,093 24,447 12,935 15,659
4,549 4,860
Total per income and expenditure account 167,270
176,672
Other operating expenditure includes: 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 Auditors remuneration External audit (of this amount £49k relates to the University) External auditors provision of non audit services: Taxation Grant audits Other work Grant audits Internal audit Operating leases Special support bursaries
50
91 - -
26 90
504 8,202
42
42 7 8
15 89
497 7,643
The total expenses paid to or on behalf of 24 governors was £10,000 (2010 - £8,000 on behalf of 24 governors). This represents travel and subsistence expenses incurred in attending Board of Governors, Committee meetings and Charity events in their official capacity. 9 Taxation 2010/11 2009/10
Group University Group University £000 £000 £000 £000 Current Tax: UK Corporation taxation at 30% Under/(Over) provision of taxation in prior years
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
-
-
-
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
58
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 10 Fundamental Restructuring Costs 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000 Restructuring costs
-
8,009
Restructuring costs incurred in the prior year relate to the cost of payments to staff under the University’s voluntary severance scheme, including any pension liabilities. The scheme came into effect in the first half of 2010 and closed at the end of May 2010 and was a proactive exercise to prepare for significant reductions in funding. There is further reference to restructuring in the operational and financial review. 11 Impairments During 2009-10 the freehold and some leasehold land and buildings of the University were revalued in accordance with accounting policy at open market value for existing use or depreciated replacement cost. This revaluation resulted in an impairment in the cost of three buildings totalling £1.492m. This amount was written off in the Income and Expenditure account for the year. 12 Tangible fixed assets Group and University
Freehold Land and Buildings
£000
Leasehold Land and Buildings
£000
Assets Under
Construc- tion
£000
Telescope
£000
Equipment
£000
Total
£000 Cost or valuation At 1 August 2010 Additions Re-classified Disposals Write off
140,495 2,278 1,162
- -
7,703 -
1,685 - -
6,652 16,093 (5,039)
- (456)
4,334 279
- - -
16,816 2,456 1,087
- -
176,000 21,106 (1,105)
- (456)
At 31 July 2011 143,935
9,388
17,250
4,613
20,359
195,545 Depreciation At 1 August 2010 Charge for the year Re-classified Disposals
1,103 3,246
(24) -
1,313 331
- -
- - - -
1,510 260
- -
9,303 4,040
- -
13,229 7,877
(24) -
At 31 July 2011 4,325
1,644
-
1,770
13,343
21,082 Net book value Inherited Financed by capital grant Other
41,976 28,059 69,575
6,213 1,204
327
- -
17,250
- 1,655 1,188
- 1,691 5,325
48,189 32,609 93,665
At 31 July 2011 139,610 7,744
17,250 2,843 7,016 174,463
At 1 August 2010
139,392
6,390
6,652
2,824
7,513
162,771
The University’s freehold and some leasehold land and buildings were valued at 30 June 2010 at open market value for existing use or depreciated replacement cost at £136.442m. In addition the remaining leased buildings are shown at the value of the lease. Included in land and buildings is land to the value of £12.85m that is not depreciated. At 31st July 2011 property with a net book value of £1.081m has been transferred to current assets. The University sold this property in September 2011.
financial statements 2
011
59
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 12 Tangible fixed assets (continued) During the year ended 31st July 2010 a building with a net book value of £3.235m (historic cost £0.247m) was disposed of by way of demolition as part of the University’s Property Strategy. A grant of £0.121m was released on disposal. The resulting loss on disposal is £3.114m. Should land and buildings that have been financed by exchequer funds be sold, the University may be required, under the terms of the Finance Memorandum with HEFCE, to surrender the proceeds. As at 31st July 2011 the net value of assets financed by exchequer funds is:
2011 £000
2010 £000
Freehold Land and Buildings Leasehold Land and Buildings Telescope Equipment
23,357 1,000
679 1,686
22,879 -
440 2,150
26,722
25,469
The University holds heritage assets, donated to the University with an insurance value of £57,000, and loaned to the University with an insurance value of £26,500. Heritage assets include paintings, vases and ceremonial maces. These assets are not recognised on the balance sheet. 13 Investments Group
Other Investments
£000
Cost or valuation At 1 August 2010 and 31 July 2011
39
Other investments are in respect of shares in CVCP Properties PLC (1.0%) and Amaze Ltd (250,000 preference shares, redemption value £nil). University
Interest in Group
Undertakings £000
Other
Investments £000
Investment in
Associates £000
Total £000
Cost or valuation Net book value at 1 August 2010 Additions
15,990
-
39
-
343
11
16,372
11 Net book value at 31 July 2011
15,990
39
354
16,383
During the year the University made further investments in Microsense Limited, Forsigs Limited and Pharmalucia Limited. These companies are spinout companies which have been set up as a vehicle for exploiting proof of concept ideas. Investments in Associates are in respect of shares in: Company Principal Activity Share Holding Microsense Limited Non invasive blood monitoring medical 83.33 % owned
devices Pharmalucia Limited Antimicrobial photodynamic therapies 49.97% owned Hotwaves Innovations Ltd Novel energy efficient water heating systems 49.97% owned Microwaste Ltd Novel microwave waste management system 49.97% owned Forsigs Ltd Developing forensic software applications 62.50% owned
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
60
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 13 Investments (continued) Liverpool Science Park Limited is a company limited by guarantee. The company was incorporated on the 13 June 2003. Liverpool John Moores University, University of Liverpool and Liverpool City Council’s interest in the company is 24.5%, 24.5% and 51% respectively. The company commenced trading in November 2005. The net assets of the company for the year ended 31 March 2011 are £229,910 (2010 £133,162), the group share of these being £56,328 (2010 £9,189). The company’s financial year end was 31st March 2011. Investment in associate - group
Share of net assets/
(liabilities) at 1 August 2010
Share of net assets/
(liabilities) for the year
Share of net assets/ (liabilities) at 31 July 2011
Liverpool Science Park Limited Pharmalucia Limited Microwaste Limited Microsense Limited Hotwaves Innovations Limited Forsigs Limited
9
5
(1)
4
1
7
47
(2)
-
(2)
(1)
(6)
56
3
(1)
2
-
1
25
36
61
14 Endowment asset investments
2011 £000
2010 £000
Group and University At 1 August 2010 Additions for the year Expenditure for the year Interest for the year Re-classification
1,646
681 (111)
15 (252)
1,363
389 (118)
12 -
Balance at 31 July 2011
1,979
1,646
Represented by:
Cash Deposits Debtors
1,872
107
1,443
203 1,979 1,646
15 Debtors Group University Amounts falling due within one year
2011 £000
2010 £000
2011 £000
2010 £000
Trade debtors Prepayments Other debtors Amounts due from associated company Amounts due from subsidiary companies
3,123 2,671 3,262
52 -
4,129 1,734 5,448
149 -
2,394 2,662 3,261
52 417
3,202 1,717 5,442
149 290
9,108
11,460
8,786
10,800
financial statements 2
011
61
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) Group University 16 Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year
2011 £000
2010 £000
2011 £000
2010 £000
HEFCE grants not applied Accruals - research grants Payroll deductions Bank loan Salix loan Amounts due to subsidiary companies Trade creditors Other creditors
5,497
13,743 2,907
538 104
- 3,261
12,684
9,302
12,540 3,363
538 - -
4,016 11,691
5,497
13,061 2,907
538 104
1,156 3,246
11,235
9,302
11,868 3,363
538 -
670 3,932
10,080
38,734
41,450
37,744
39,753
Group University 17 Creditors: Amounts falling due after one year
2011 £000
2010 £000
2011 £000
2010 £000
Bank loan Salix Loan Intercompany leases
36,425
241 -
26,963
- -
36,425
241 16,158
26,963
- 16,158
36,666
26,963
52,824
43,121
18 Interest rate risk profile of financial liabilities
Cash at Bank and in hand Short Term Deposits Group University Group University
2011 £000
2010 £000
2011£000
2010 £000
2011 £000
2010 £000
2011 £000
2010 £000
Floating Rate Fixed Rate
5,253
-
2,710
-
4,851
-
1,923
-
-
32,128
-
27,854
-
32,128
-
27,854
As at 31 July 2011
5,253
2,710
4,851
1,923
32,128
27,854
32,128
27,854
The short-term deposits are placed with banks at rates based on prevailing market rates at the time of the deposit. All balances were held in sterling. 2011 2010 £000 £000 Maturity of financial liabilities Within 1 year or on demand Between 1 & 2 years Between 3 & 5 years Over 5 years
642 642
1,718 34,306
538 538
1,614 24,811
37,308
27,501
All financial liabilities relate to bank and loan debt.
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
62
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 18 Interest rate risk profile of financial liabilities (continued) The Bank loans are as follows:
Original Value
£m
Term Years
Fixed/Variable Security
Interest rate
10.4 3.0 3.0
20.0 10.0
25 25 25
25 from 2013 18 from 2015
Fixed to 2009 Variable Variable Fixed to 2038 Fixed to 2033
Aldham Robarts LRC Assorted Properties Avril Robarts LRC Art and Design Academy Art and Design Academy
8.11% 6.41% 6.86%
6.065% 6.36%
There is also a 21 year lease in respect of the Avril Robarts Learning Resource Centre. Borrowing facilities The group has £30m undrawn borrowing facility available as at 31 July 2011. Total
£000
Floating Rate Financial
Liabilities £000
Fixed Rate Financial
Liabilities £000
As at 31 July 2011
37,308
2,940
34,368
As at 31 July 2010
27,501
3,180
24,321
All the group’s creditors falling due within 1 year (other than bank and other borrowings) are excluded from the above table. 19 Provisions for liabilities and charges Group and University Pension
Enhancements
Other
Total £000 £000 £000 At 1 August 2010 Utilised in the year Transfer from/(to) income and expenditure account
11,759
(733)
880
5,564
(3,043)
569
17,323
(3,776)
1,449
At 31 July 2011
11,906
3.090
14,996
The pension provision is in respect of pension enhancements payable to staff that have taken early retirement. The provision has been revalued at 31 July 2011. Included within other provisions is a provision for restructuring costs of £2.793m (2010 £5.117m). Restructuring costs incurred in the current year totalled £1.624m (2010 £8.009m) and relate to the cost of payments to staff under the University’s voluntary severance scheme, including any pension liabilities. The scheme came into effect in the first half of 2010 and closed at the end of May 2010 and was a proactive exercise to prepare for significant reductions in funding. During the year £2.884m (2010 £2.892m) was paid out.
financial statements 2
011
63
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 20 Deferred capital grants
Group and University
Funding Council £000
Other £000
Total
£000 At 1 August 2010 Buildings Equipment
22,879
2,150
5,474 1,455
28,353
3,605 Total
25,029
6,929
31,958
Income Buildings Equipment
2,315 517
- 18
2,315 535
Total
2,832
18
2,850
Adjustment to Other Equipment Released to income and expenditure Buildings (notes 1 and 4) Equipment (note 1 and 4)
-
(837) (982)
(27)
(110) (243)
(27)
(947) (1,225)
Total
(1,819)
(353)
(2,172)
At 31 July 2011 Buildings Equipment
24,357
1,685
5,364 1,203
29,721
2,888 Total
26,042
6,567
32,609
Included in the Buildings total of £29,721k is £1,655k relating to the Telescope enclosure which is shown in the Telescope category in Fixed Assets (Note 12). 21 Endowments Group and University
Restricted
Permanent £000
Restricted Expendable
£000
Total 2011 £000
Total 2010
£000 Balances at 1 August 2010 Capital Accumulated income
12
-
1,542
92
1,554
92
1,283
80 12 1,634 1,646 1,363 Additions for the year Interest for the year Expenditure for the year
-
- -
681
15
(111)
681
15
(111)
389
12
(118) Net - (96) (96) (106) Reclassification Balances at 31 July 2011
-
12
(252)
1,967
(252)
1,979
-
1,646 Represented by: Capital Accumulated income
12 -
1,860 107
1,872 107
1,554 92
12
1,967
1,979
1,646
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
64
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 22 Revaluation reserve Group and University Revaluations
2011 £000
2010 £000
At 1 August 2010 Revaluation during the year Disposals (note 23) Contributions to depreciation: Released in year (note 23)
46,011 - -
(730)
40,767 8,983
(2,988) (751)
At 31 July 2011
45,281
46,011
23 Income and expenditure account Group
2011 £000
Group 2010
£000
University 2011
£000
University 2010
£000
At 1 August 2010
(20,564) (21,822) (20,169)
(21,385)
Surplus/(deficit) retained for the year Transfer from revaluation reserve Actuarial gain/(loss) in respect of pension scheme Actuarial gain in respect of RPI to CPI adjustment
9,108 730
1,715
-
(8,919) 3,739
(5,886)
12,324
9,102 730
1,715
-
(7,469) 2,247
(5,886)
12,324
At 31 July 2011
(9,011)
(20,564)
(8,622)
(20,169)
Balance represented by: Pension Reserve Income and Expenditure account excluding pension reserve
(62,908) 53,897
(61,763) 41,199
(62,908) 54,286
(61,763) 41,594
(9,011) (20,564)
(8,622)
(20,169)
24 Reconciliation of consolidated operating surplus to net cashflow from operating activities 2010/11
£000 2009/10
£000
Operating Surplus/(deficit) before taxation Redundancy Costs
8,997 -
(815) (8,009)
FRS 17 Depreciation (note 12) Impairment Loss on disposal of fixed assets Deferred capital grants released to income (note 20) Interest receivable (note 5) Interest payable less net interest on pension liabilities (increase)/ decrease in stock (Increase)/ decrease in debtors (Decrease)/ increase in creditors (Decrease)/ increase in provisions (note 19) Endowment reclassification Fixed assets write off Share of profits of associates
2,860 7,877
- -
(2,172) (285)
2,098 (6)
2,375 (2,820) (2,327)
252 456 (15)
4,242 7,578 1,492 3,114
(2,496) (201)
1,573 -
(3,187) 1,630 4,388
116 - -
Net cash inflow from operating activities
17,290
9,425
financial statements 2
011
65
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 25 Analysis of cash flows for headings netted in the cashflow statement
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Returns on investments and servicing of finance Interest received Interest paid
285
(2,098)
178
(1,573)
(1,813)
(1,395) Capital expenditure and financial investment Purchase of tangible fixed assets (note 12) Receipt of deferred capital grants (note 20)
(21,106) 2,850
(25,636) 7,706
(18,256) (17,930)
Management of liquid resources Cash placed on short term deposit (note 26)
4,274
7,413 Financing Repayment of secured loan Repayment of Salix Loan Salix Loan received in year Secured bank loan drawn down in year
(538) (53) 398
10,000
(538) - -
20,000
9,807
19,462
26 Analysis of net debt At 1
August 2010 £000
Cash
Flow £000
Non Cash Change £000
At 31 July 2011 £000
Cash in hand and at bank: Endowments General
1,646 2,710
211
2,543
15
-
1,872 5,253
4,356 2,754 15 7,125 Debt due after one year Debt due within one year
(26,963)
(538)
(10,241)
434
538
(538)
(36,666)
(642) (27,501) (9,807) - (37,308) Current asset investments
27,854
4,274
-
32,128
4,709
(2,779)
15
1,945
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
66
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 27 Pension schemes The pension schemes for the University’s staff are the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (TPS), which is administered by the Teachers’ Pension Agency (TPA), the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), which is administered by Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited and the Merseyside Pension Fund (MPF), which is administered by Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council. Teachers’ Pension The Teachers’ Pension Scheme is an unfunded defined benefit scheme. Contributions for the year ended 31 July 2011 amount to £5,271,737 (2010 – £5,795,271). Contributions on a pay as you go basis are credited to the exchequer under arrangements governed by the Superannuation Act 1972. The pensions cost is assessed every five years in accordance with the advice of the government actuary. The assumptions and other data that have the most significant effect on the determination of the contribution levels are as follows: Latest actuarial valuation Actuarial method Gross rate of return Rate of real earnings growth Market value of assets at date of last valuation Proportion of members’ benefits covered by the actuarial value of the assets
31 March 2004 Prospective Benefits 6.5% per annum 1.5% per annum £163,240m 100%
Following the implementation of Teachers’ Pensions (Employers’ Supplementary Contributions) Regulations 2000 the government actuary carried out a further review on the level of employers’ contributions. With effect from 1 January 2007 the employers and employees contributions were 14.1% and 6.4% respectively, Under the definitions set out in Financial Reporting Standard 17 (Retirement Benefits), the TPS is a multi-employer pension scheme. The University is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities of the scheme. Accordingly, the University has taken advantage of the exemption in FRS 17 and has accounted for its contributions to the scheme as if it were a defined contribution scheme. Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) The University participates in the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), a defined benefit scheme which is contracted out of the State Second Pension (S2P). The assets of the scheme are held in a separate fund administrated by the trustee, Universities Superannuation Scheme Limited. USS has over 130,000 active members and the University has 27 active members participating in the scheme. Because of the mutual nature of the scheme, the University is unable to identify its share of the underlying assets and liabilities of the scheme on a consistent and reasonable basis and therefore, as required by FRS 17 “Retirement Benefits”, accounts for the scheme as if it were a defined contribution scheme. As a result, the amount charged to the income and expenditure account represents the contributions payable to the scheme in respect of the accounting period. The latest actuarial valuation of the scheme was at 31 March 2008. This was the first valuation for USS under the new scheme-specific funding regime introduced by the Pensions Act 2004, which requires schemes to adopt a statutory funding objective, which is to have sufficient and appropriate assets to cover their technical provisions. At the valuation date, the value of the assets of the scheme was £28,842.6 million and the value of the scheme’s technical provisions was £28,135.3 million indicating a surplus of £707.3 million. The assets therefore were sufficient to cover 103% of the benefits which had accrued to members allowing for expected future increases in earnings. The University contribution rate required for future service benefits alone at the date of the valuation was 16% of pensionable salaries and the trustee company, on the advice of the actuary, agreed to increase the University contribution to 16% of pensionable salaries from 1 October 2009. Since 31 March 2008 global investment markets have continued to fall and at 31 March 2009 the actuary has estimated that the funding level under the new scheme specific funding regime had fallen from 103% to 75%. By comparison the 12 months from April 2009 to March 2010 has shown an improvement in the funding level from 75% to 91% as at 31 March 2010. This estimate is based on the funding level at 31 March 2008, adjusted to reflect the fund’s actual investment performance over the year and changes in market conditions (market conditions affect both the valuation rate of interest and also the inflation assumption which in turn impacts on the salary and pension increase assumptions).
financial statements 2
011
67
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) On the FRS17 basis, using an AA bond discount rate of 5.6% per annum based on spot yields, the actuary estimated that the funding level at 31 March 2010 was 80%. An estimate of the funding level measured on a buy-out basis at that date was approximately 57%. Surpluses or deficits which arise at future valuations may impact on the University’s future contribution commitment. A deficit may require additional funding in the form of higher contribution requirements, where a surplus could, perhaps, be used to similarly reduce contribution requirements. USS is a “last man standing” scheme so that in the event of the insolvency of any of the participating employers in USS, the amount of any pension funding shortfall (which cannot otherwise be recovered) in respect of that employer will be spread across the remaining participant employers and reflected in the next actuarial valuation of the scheme. The next formal triennial actuarial valuation is due as at 31 March 2011. The contribution rate will be reviewed as part of each valuation and may be reviewed more frequently. The total pension contribution to USS for the University was £219k (2010 £185k). The employer contribution rate payable by the University for the financial year was 16%. Surpluses or deficits, which arise at future valuations, may impact on universities’ future contribution commitment. Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) - Merseyside Pension Fund The LGPS is a funded defined benefit scheme, with the assets held in separate trustee administered funds. The total contribution made for the year ended 31 July 2011 was £5,231,423 (2010 £5,373,973). The agreed contribution rate for employers for the financial year was 14.8% from 1 August 2010 to 31 March 2011, and 10.5% thereafter. The employee rate paid is based on the whole time equivalent pensionable pay in accordance with the following table:
Salary
Pension Contribution Rate
£0 – 12,000 £12,000.01 – 14,000 £14,000.01 – 18,000 £18,000.01 – 30,000 £30,000.01 – 40,000 £40,000.01 – 75,000 More than £75,000.01
5.5% 5.8% 5.9% 6.5% 6.8% 7.2% 7.5%
The pensions cost is assessed every three years in accordance with the advice of a qualified independent actuary. All revisions to contributions were implemented from 1 April 2008. The assumptions and other data that have the most significant effect on the determination of the contribution levels are as follows: Latest actuarial valuation Actuarial method Investment returns per annum Pension increases per annum Salary scale increases per annum Market value of assets at date of last valuation Proportion of members’ accrued benefits covered by the actuarial value of the assets
31 March 2010 Projected Unit 6.75% per annum 3.0% per annum 4.5% per annum £4,706 million 78%
The following information is based upon a full actuarial valuation of the Fund at 31 March 2008 updated to 31 July 2011 by a qualified independent actuary. At 31 July
2011 At 31 July
2010 Inflation Rate of increase in salaries Rate of increase for pensions Discount rate for liabilities
3.4% 4.4% 2.9% 5.3%
3.3% 4.55%
2.8% 5.5%
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
68
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) The current mortality assumptions include sufficient allowance for future improvements in mortality rates. The assumed life expectations on retirement age 65 are: At 31 July
2011 At 31 July
2010 Retiring today Males Females Retiring in 20 years Males Females
Years
21.4 24.1
22.8 25.7
Years
20.4 23.2
21.3 24.1
The University’s share of the assets in the scheme and the expected rates of return were: Long term
rate of return
expected at
31 July 2011
Value at 31 July 2011
£000
Long term rate of return
expected at
31 July 2010
Value at 31 July 2010
£000
Equities Government Bonds Other Bonds Property Cash/liquidity Other
7.0% 3.9% 4.9% 6.0% 0.5% 7.0%
82,862 17,404
4,935 11,689
2,987 10,001
7.5% 4.2% 5.1% 6.5% 0.5% 7.5%
70,321 17,438
4,787 7,750 2,735
10,941
Total Market Value of assets
129,878
113,972
Analysis of the amount charged to income and expenditure account Year Ended
31 July 2011 £000
Year Ended 31 July
2010 £000
Employer Service cost Curtailment costs/Past service
5,787 408
5,641 88
Total operating charge
6,195
5,729
Analysis of net pension finance (costs) Year Ended
31 July 2011 £000
Year Ended 31 July
2010 £000
Expected return on pension scheme assets Interest on pension liabilities
7,373 (9,727)
6,242 (10,108)
Net pension finance (costs)
(2,354)
(3,866)
financial statements 2
011
69
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) Amount recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses (STRGL) Year Ended
31 July 2011 £000
Year Ended 31 July
2010 £000
Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets Change in financial and demographic assumptions underlying the scheme liabilities
6,380 (4,665)
9,124 (15,010)
Actuarial gain/(loss) recognised in STRGL
1,715
(5,886)
Actuarial gain in respect of RPI to CPI adjustments
-
12,324
Total effect of Actuarial gains on STRGL
1,715
6,438
Movement in deficit during the year Year Ended
31 July 2011 £000
Year Ended 31 July
2010 £000
Deficit in scheme at 1 August 2010 Movement in year: Current service charge Contributions Past service/Curtailment cost Actuarial gain in respect of RPI to CPI adjustment Net interest on assets Actuarial gain/(loss)
(61,763)
(5,787) 5,689 (408)
- (2,354) 1,715
(63,959)
(5,641) 5,353
(88) 12,324 (3,866) (5,886)
Deficit in scheme at 31 July 2011
(62,908)
(61,763)
In accordance with the revised FRS17 accounting standard, assets have been valued at realisable (i.e. bid) values for the year ended 31 July 2011. Previously assets were valued at fair (in effect mid market) value. Given the immaterial nature of the adjustments, a prior period adjustment has not been made for the change in valuation method. Analysis of the movements in the present value of the scheme liabilities Year Ended
31 July 2011 £000
Year Ended 31 July
2010 £000
At the beginning of the year Current service cost Interest cost Contributions by scheme participants Actuarial losses and (gains) Benefits paid Past service cost Curtailments
175,735 5,787 9,727 2,297 4,665
(5,833) -
408
158,024 5,641
10,108 2,548
15,010 (3,360)
(12,324) 88
At the end of the year
192,786
175,735
finan
cial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
70
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued Analysis of movement in the market value of the scheme assets Year Ended
31 July 2011 £000
Year Ended 31 July
2010 £000
At the beginning of the year Expected rate of return on scheme assets Actuarial (losses) and gains Contribution by the employer Contributions by scheme participants Benefits paid
113,972 7,373 6,380 5,689 2,297
(5,833)
94,065 6,242 9,124 5,353 2,548
(3,360) At the end of the year
129,878
113,972
Reserves Year
Ended 31 July
2011 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2010 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2009 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2008 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2007 £000
University’s estimated asset share Present value of scheme liabilities
129,878 (192,786)
113,972 (175,735)
94,065 (158,024)
95,784 (159,440)
94,546 (122,055)
Deficit in the scheme
(62,908)
(61,763)
(63,959)
(63,656)
(27,509)
History of experience gains and losses Year
Ended 31 July
2011 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2010 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2009 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2008 £000
Year Ended
31 July 2007 £000
Difference between the expected and actual return on assets: Amount
(6,380)
(7,124)
12,591
9,249
2,774 % of scheme assets 4.9% 8% 13.4% 9.7% 2.9% Change in assumptions Amount % of scheme liabilities
(4,665)
2.4%
(15,010)
8.5%
17,202 10.9%
(23,614)
14.9%
4,264 3.5%
Total amount recognised in STRGL Amount
1,715
(5,886)
4,611
(32,863)
7,038
% of scheme liabilities 0.9% 3.3% 2.9% 20.7% 5.8%
financial statements 2
011
71
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 28 Access funds 2010/11
£000
2009/10 £000
Balance at 1 August 2011 Funding Council grants Interest earned
39 537
-
190 579
3 576
772
Disbursed to students (484)
(733)
Balance at 31 July 2011
92
39
Funding Council grants are available solely for students; the University acts only as paying agent. The grants and related disbursements are therefore excluded from the Income and Expenditure Account. 29 Training and Development Agency bursaries
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Balance at 1 August 2010 Training and Development Agency grants
(239) 3,045
295 2,560
University administration fee Disbursed to students
2,806
(55) (2,785)
2,855
(56) (3,038)
Balance at 31 July 2011
(34)
(239)
30 Operating Leases Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Less than one year Between one and five years More than five years
508 889
-
505 1,397
-
1,397
1,902
31 Capital commitments
2010/11 £000
2009/10 £000
Capital expenditure contracted for, but not provided for in the financial statements Capital expenditure authorised by Board of Governors, but not yet contracted for
21,000 9,100
26,000 4,100
Balance at 31 July 2011
30,100
30,100
fin
ancial s
tate
men
ts 2
011
72
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 July 2011 (continued) 32 Related party transactions No transactions in 2010/11 were identified which should be disclosed under Financial Reporting Standard 8 ‘Related Party Disclosures’. The Group has taken advantage of the exemption set out in FRS 8 and has not disclosed intra-group transactions. 33 Subsidiary undertaking The subsidiary companies, with the exception of Liverpool John Moores (Malaysia) SDN.BHD are registered in England and Wales. Liverpool John Moores (Malaysia) SDN.BHD is registered in Malaysia and ownership in the UK is via circular transaction. All the subsidiary companies, wholly owned or effectively controlled by the University, are as follows: Company Principle Activity Status JMU Property Development Company Ltd Property Development Company 100% owned JMU Services Ltd Academic enterprise 100% owned JMU Learning Resource Centre Ltd Leasing of the Avril Robarts Learning 100% owned
Resource Centre JMU Building Services and Maintenance Ltd Promotion of the advancement of education -
By provision of funds to the University Liverpool Business School Ltd Dormant 100% owned Liverpool John Moores (Malaysia) SDN.BHD Promote and support collaborations within 100% owned
Malaysia The University exercises a significant influence over the operations of JMU Building Services and Maintenance Limited, a company limited by guarantee. The University is the guarantor and the directors of the company must be appointed from officers or governors of the University, or members of the Company. 34 Ultimate Parent Organisation Liverpool John Moores University is the ultimate parent organisation. Copies of the group accounts are obtainable from the Finance Director, 4th Floor, Kingsway House, Hatton Garden, Liverpool, L3 2AJ. 35 Post Balance Sheet Events On 30 August 2011, the University drew down £10m, as part of a £60m loan facility, agreed with Barclays Bank Plc. This loan facility was arranged as part of the University’s Property Strategy. On 26 September 2011, the University sold a property on Myrtle Street for £1.316m. This sale was arranged as part of the University’s Property Strategy.
financial statements 2
011
73
74
www.ljmu.ac.ukLiverpool John Moores University, Egerton Court, 2 Rodney Street, Liverpool L3 5UX
© Corporate Communications
Date of publication March 2010