36
Lim Kim-Hwa & Ooi Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 www.penanginstitute.org/gst “Implementing Goods and Services Tax in Malaysia”

Lim Kim- Hwa & Ooi Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

  • Upload
    ban

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

“Implementing Goods and Services Tax in Malaysia”. Lim Kim- Hwa & Ooi Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 www.penanginstitute.org/gst. Structure. Key Issues. Key Issues. Key Issues. Household Impact. Latest Household Expenditure Survey (2009/2010). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Lim Kim-Hwa & Ooi Pei Qi30 Oct 2013

www.penanginstitute.org/gst

“Implementing Goods and Services Tax in Malaysia”

Page 2: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Structure

Household impact from GST• Who pays? • How much?Net effect after Budget’s measuresWhy was GST predicted to be in the Budget?

Page 3: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Key Issues• Average household

pays• RM 90/month• 2.52% of income

What is the impact of GST on

households?

• Yes. GST = Regressive tax

• Monthly income:• RM 30,815: 1.32%• RM 605: 2.35%• RM 2,579: 2.67%

Will GST hit the poor more?

Page 4: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Key Issues• Income tax payers get tax

cuts• Non-income tax payers get

BR1M• Low income: more cash• Middle income: less cash• High income: more cash• Budget: negative for

middle income

Net effect after

Budget’s measures

• RM 6 billion from households• After RM 500k

business registration threshold

• Before GST fraud

How much will GST raise?

Page 5: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Key Issues• SST abolished,

additional CPI:• Max: 3.38%• Min: 0.56%• Most likely: 1.32%

How inflationary

is GST?

• QE taper risk remain – Malaysia should insulate itself

• Need income tax adjustments for middle income

Recommendations

Page 6: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Household Impact

• Essential food

• Basic non-value added items

• Healthcare• Public

transportation

• Education

• Clothes &

footwear• Restaura

nts & Hotels

• Household

equipment

• Tobacco &

alcohol

• RM 90 per

month

Latest Household Expenditure Survey (2009/2010)0% rated

and exempted

items

6% standard

rated items

Average household pays 3.80% of expenditure or

2.52% of income

Page 7: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

GST rate (%)

Spending pattern GST payment

Health, Education

(0.00%)Food and non-

alcoholic beverages (1.66%), housing, water, electricity,

gas and other fuels (1.42%)

Transport (5.39%), recreation services and

culture (5.73%), miscellaneous goods and

services (5.74%)

Restaurants and hotels, furnishing, household equipment and routine

household maintenance, clothing and footwear, communication, alcoholic

beverages and tobacco (6.00%)

Page 8: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Higher GST burden if you are:Low and middle income

Single person household

Young (less than 24 years old) household

Bumiputera-led householdsClerical workers, skilled agricultural and fishery workersPeninsular Malaysia

Page 9: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Calculating GST burden (GSTI)Total Income

GST (RM)

GSTI

Income increases

Expenditure

increases; but

lower magnitud

e

Income – expenditu

re relationsh

ip is concave

Page 10: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Income – expenditure relationship (from Bank Negara estimates)

5000

1000

0

1500

0

0

5000

10000

15000

3,040

4,9405,840

Income

Expe

nditu

re

Page 11: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Less than

RM500

RM500 - 599

RM600 − 699

RM700 − 799

RM800 − 899

RM900 − 999

RM1000 − 1999

RM2000 − 2999

RM3000 − 3999

RM4000 − 4999

RM5000 and over

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

Expenditure (RM) Income (RM) GSTI (%)

Higher GSTI:Low and middle income household

Worst hit: monthly income

RM2,579

Page 12: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten and over

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

Expenditure (RM) Income (RM) GSTI (%)

Higher GSTI:Single person household

Page 13: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

<24 25-34 35-44 45-64 >650

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

Expenditure (RM) Income (RM) GSTI (%)

Higher GSTI:Young (less than 24 years old) household

Page 14: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Total

Total C

itizens

Bumiputera

Chinese

Indians

Others

Non-Malay

sian Citize

ns0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

Expenditure (RM) Income (RM) GSTI (%)

Higher GSTI:Bumiputera-led & non-Malaysian household

Page 15: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Legisla

tors, se

nior officia

ls and m

anag

ers

Professio

nals

Tech

nicians a

nd asso

ciate

professio

nals

Clerica

l worke

rs

Servi

ces w

orkers

and sh

op and m

arket

sales

workers

Skille

d agric

ultural

and fish

ery w

orkers

Craft an

d relat

ed w

orkers

Plant a

nd mach

ine-opera

tors an

d assem

blers

Elemen

tary o

ccupati

ons

Occupati

on not else

where cla

ssified

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

Expenditure (RM) Income (RM) GSTI (%)

Higher GSTI:Clerical & services workers, Farmers, Fishermen

Page 16: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Higher GST contribution:Peninsular Malaysia

Page 17: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Our interactive spreadsheet:www.penanginstitute.org/gst

Page 18: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Measures in the BudgetCash outflo

w

Cash inflo

w

BR1M

Income tax cut

GST

Page 19: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Annual Household Income

Less t

han RM500

RM500 - 599

RM600 − 699

RM700 − 799

RM800 − 899

RM900 − 999

RM1000 − 1999

RM2000 − 2999

RM3000 − 3999

RM4000 − 4999

RM5000 and over

-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

Monthly Expenditure

RM

Page 20: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Budget’s measures:Income tax cuts, BR1M & GST

(6,000)

(4,000)

(2,000)

-

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

- - - - - - - 464

931

2,230

7,857

650 650 650 650 650 650 450 - - - - (162) (235) (289) (347) (403) (448) (776)

(1,400) (2,054)

(2,642)

(4,730)

Income tax saving (household) BR1M GST payment (household)

RM

Page 21: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

488 415 361 303 247 202

(326)

(937) (1,123)

(412)

3,127

Income tax saving + BR1M - GST payment (household)Annual income (household)

RM RM

Income tax savings + BR1M – GST:Middle income worse off

Middle income:

worse off

Page 22: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Budget: households with current annual income RM 30k- 150k to pay more taxAnnual

income (household)

7,266

10,40

7

12,38

0

14,44

3

16,55

1

18,66

2

30,950

60,17

7

94,52

4

138,5

21

369,778

Chargeable income (individual)

-

1,238

3,178

4,115

4,787

5,509

13,55

9

32,282

52,242 74,126

159,64

6 Income tax saving (household)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

464

931

2,230

7,857

BR1M 650

650

650

650

650

650

450 -

-

-

-

GST payment (household)

(162)

(235)

(289)

(347)

(403)

(448)

(776)

(1,400

)

(2,054

)

(2,642

)

(4,730

)Income tax saving + BR1M - GST (household)

488

415

361

303

247

202

(326) (937)

(1,123

)

(412) 3,127

More tax

Page 23: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Mitigate negative effect on middle income 1: Our proposed income tax rates

Chargeable Income (upper limit) Our proposal

Change vs. current

Change vs. Budget

5,000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%20,000 1.0% -1.0% 0.0%35,000 1.5% -4.5% -3.5%50,000 8.0% -3.0% -2.0%70,000 18.0% -1.0% 2.0%

100,000 24.0% 0.0% 3.0%250,000 25.0% -1.0% 1.0%400,000 25.0% -1.0% 0.5%

9,999,999 25.0% -1.0% 0.0%Bigger cuts at lower income Smaller cuts at higher

incomeExpenditure efficiency improvements to make up any revenue shortfall

Page 24: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Budget vs. Our Proposal:Income tax savings + BR1M – GST

(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

-

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

400,000

488 415 361 303 247 202

(326) (318)

281 160 449

Income tax saving + BR1M - GST payment (Budget)Income tax saving + BR1M - GST payment (Proposal)Annual household income (RHS)

EM RM

Middle income: less

worse off

Highest income: less

better off

Page 25: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Total GST Revenue from HouseholdsPerfect condition: RM 6.5

billionPractical condition:

RM 6 billionRealistic

condition: Less than RM

6 billion

GST Fraud

?

Simplify tax administratio

n (GST register if > RM 0.5m

sales)Simplify tax

administration

(GST register if > RM 0.5m

sales)

Page 26: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Food and non-alcoholic beverages

9%

Clothing and footwear

5%

Communication9%

Housing, water, electricity, gas and

other fuels8%

Alcoholic beverages and tobacco

3%

Transport 21%

Recreation services and culture

7%

Restaurants and hotels17%

Furnishings, house-hold equipment and routine household

maintenance6%

Miscellaneous goods and services

13%

GST Revenue Source

Page 27: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Mitigate negative effect on middle income 2: Make GST less regressive

Transport Hotels &

Restaurants

Top 2 GST revenue source

High GST rate on selected

items

Multi-tier GST

Page 28: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Why target Transport? Transport as % of income increases as income rises

Less than RM500

RM500 - 599 RM1000 − 1999

RM3000 − 3999

RM4000 − 4999

RM5000 and over

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

Food and non-alcoholic beverages Housing, water, electricity, gas and other fuelsRestaurants and hotels Transport Alcohol beverages and tobacco Income (RM Jul '13)

RM

2%

5.8%

6.7%

Page 29: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Raise same amount of revenue but make GST less regressive?

Broaden tax base

Raise billions

Simple, effective tax

regime

Multi-tiered GST

High GST rate on only some

items

Income Tax rate cut,

refundable tax credits

Difficult – middle income groups still pay

higher GSTI

Page 30: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Less than

RM500

RM500 - 599

RM600 − 699

RM700 − 799

RM800 − 899

RM900 − 999

RM1000 − 1999

RM2000 − 2999

RM3000 − 3999

RM4000 − 4999

RM5000 and over

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

Income (RM)Base: Flat 6% standard rate25%: transport (excl public transportation); 2% standard GST rate17.5%: transport (excl public transportation), restaurants & hotels

Base 6% vs:Multi-tiered, High GST rate on selected items

Cannot make middle income pay less GSTI than

highest income

Page 31: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

GST is a strongly regressive taxHigher income households still pay lower GSTI

GST is intrinsically regressive

Middle income households still pay higher GSTI

Hence, need income tax reduction, refundable tax credits/rebates

Page 32: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Why was GST predicted to be in the Budget?

First Budget after GE13

Fiscal deficits since 1998

High debt• Sovereign: RM

519 billion (Q2 2013)

• Household: 80.5% GDP (2012)

Low US interest rates about to end• Now: 2.6%• 1999-2008:

4.7%

Foreigners hold RM 126 billion

Malaysia Government

Debt

Credit rating

downgrade risk

Government’s

credibility

GST Introduc

ed

Page 33: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Foreigners’ holdings inMalaysia Government Debt

Jan 05:RM 9 billion

Jul 13:RM 126

billion

Jun/Jul 2013:

Foreign capital

withdrawn

Page 34: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Foreign Capital withdrawnBorrowing Costs Increase (3.4%4%)

Jun/Jul 2013: Foreign

capital exert significant influence

Page 35: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Fiscal Deficit

Deteriorates

Credit Rating

Downgrade

Foreign Capital

Withdraw

Borrowing Costs Increase

Slower Economic Growth

SignificanceSovereign Debt: RM 519 billion (Q2 2013)

1% higher interest rate

Additional RM 5.19 billion

interest

Low US interest rates end

Page 36: Lim Kim- Hwa  &  Ooi  Pei Qi 30 Oct 2013 penanginstitute/gst

Wider ImplicationsInflation per CPI • Spike up 1.32% additionally (ignore secondary effects)

Credit rating agencies & foreign capital reassured?

Measures sufficient to insulate Malaysia from QE taper risk?

Economic growth• Higher domestic spending due to BR1M and front loading of

spending• Ringgit uncertainFiscal reform, wider tax harmonisation

Property prices• Overall effect uncertain

Narrowing window for fiscal reform