23
Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly Sam Homiller YITP, Stony Brook Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 1 arXiv:1911.10203 (accepted in PRL) In collaboration with D. Egaña-Ugrinovic and Patrick Meade APS April Meeting, April 21, 2020

Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly

Sam HomillerYITP, Stony Brook

Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly

1

arXiv:1911.10203 (accepted in PRL)

In collaboration with D. Egaña-Ugrinovic and Patrick Meade

APS April Meeting, April 21, 2020

Page 2: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 2

KOTO Measures Rare Kaon DecaysKOTO is an experiment at J-PARC searching for the rare decay of a neutral Kaon into a pion + neutrinos

K ⇡

Br(KL ! ⇡0⌫⌫)SM = (3.4± 0.6)⇥ 10�11

Buras et al., arXiv:1503.02693

Page 3: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 3

K0L

Collimators, Sweeping Magnet, etc…

π0γ

γ

νν

Hermetic Veto System

Cal

orim

eter

s

Charged Particles Deflected

Target

Proton beam

KOTO Measures Rare Kaon Decays

zRe

cons

truct

edπ0

p T

Reconstructed π0 vertex (z)

Signal events

Measure angle between photons and their energies

Demand no other activity in the detector

Page 4: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly

SM Signal + Background expectation: events

4

Shinohara, KAON 2019

The KOTO “Anomaly” As of Fall 2019

Single Event Sensitivity: 6.9⇥ 10�10

?

0.1± 0.02

Page 5: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly

SM Signal + Background expectation: events

5

Shinohara, KAON 2019

The KOTO “Anomaly” As of Early 2020

Single Event Sensitivity: 7.1⇥ 10�10

0.39± 0.08Including preliminary estimate of charged Kaon contamination

Page 6: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 6

Confronting the Anomaly

Theoretical perspective: are there simple & motivated ways of explaining this result with new physics?

The 2 events are consistent with:

The absolute simplest: add a scalar singlet to the SM

Yes!

Br(KL ! ⇡0 + inv.)KOTO = 1.4+1.8(3.7)�0.9(1.2) ⇥ 10�9

Page 7: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 7

Higgs Portal Explanation of KOTO

⇣(H†H') ! ⇣ (vh') ! sin ✓ ⇠ ⇣v/m

2h

Add to the SM a scalar singlet, mixing with the Higgs:

s d

qjgj

qj

'

K ⇡

All couplings dictated by the mixing angle

escapes KOTO undetected, mimicking the neutrinos

Scalar is long lived

Egana-Ugrinovic, SH, Meade [1911.10203]

Page 8: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 8

Higgs Portal Explanation of KOTOEgana-Ugrinovic, SH, Meade [1911.10203]

Blue: preferred KOTO region

Dashed-gray: scalar lifetime

(2 events)

Page 9: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 9

Higgs Portal Explanation of KOTOEgana-Ugrinovic, SH, Meade [1911.10203]

Consistent with all other bounds and explains the 2 events!

Page 10: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 10

Bounds: Charged Kaon DecaysThe same diagram also leads to charged Kaon decays:

K+ ! ⇡+⌫⌫(model-independent relationship: Grossman, Nir, Phys. Lett B398, 1997, 163-168)

Constrained by NA62 and E949

s d

qjgj

qj

'

For charged pions, can reconstruct the missing mass

Large background when m' ⇠ m⇡=)(“predicted” by Hou et al., 1412.4397, 1611.09673)

“‘Blessed are the Blind, for they shall see the Heavens open’ .… … So, please: Analyze, KOTO, Analyze!”

Page 11: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 11

Bounds: Proton Beam DumpsCHARM: 400 GeV (SPS) proton beam dump

400 GeV beam

35 m

5 m480 m

Cu

' ! e+e�K ! ⇡'

⌘ ! ⇡'

Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458

Bounds cover a large portion of the window left open by NA62

Beam Dumps lead to tension with “intermediate lifetime” explanations of the KOTO events

Page 12: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 12

What if we change the scalar couplings?Different Flavor textures let us investigate alternative solutions to KOTO

cuij

M'H Qiuj !

8><

>:

gu'uu

gc'cc

gt'tt

s d

qjgj

qj

'

Coupling predominantly to charm leads to intermediate-lifetime scalars

' gc

�c

c

c

Similar to Minimal Higgs Portal!

Page 13: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 13

Different Flavor textures let us investigate alternative solutions to KOTO

cuij

M'H Qiuj !

8><

>:

gu'uu

gc'cc

gt'tt

Coupling predominantly to charm leads to intermediate-lifetime scalars

' gc

�c

c

c

What if we change the scalar couplings?

Page 14: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly

• There’s a large anomaly in rare Kaon decays

• Events can be explained by the simplest extension of the SM

• Strongest constraints come from beam-dumps and charged Kaons

• Non-minimal solutions using a shorter lifetime can work, but are in tension with beam dump constraints

14

Summary

What’s Next?• Look out for KOTO final analysis (expected to finish this Summer)

• More data from 2019 KOTO Run

• New NA62 results?(Volpe, Tues. Flavor Session)

• Future LLP Experiments? (See PBC Summary: 1901.09966)

DM Implications: Pospelov, Ritz, Voloshin 0711.4866, Krnjaic, 1512.04119

Page 15: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 15

Backup

Page 16: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 16

2 Events vs. 3 Events

3 events 2 events

Page 17: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 17

2 Events vs. 3 Events

3 events 2 events

Page 18: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 18

Future Constraints (PBC)

Page 19: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 19

2016-2018 Background Estimationfrom Satoshi Shinohara, KAON 2019

Page 20: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 20

Updated Background EstimatesAs of January, 2020 from T. Nomura, J-PARC Meeting

Page 21: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 21

Updated Background EstimatesAs of January, 2020 from T. Nomura, J-PARC Meeting

(Jan. 17, 2020)

Page 22: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 22

KOTO 2015 Result

BR < 3.0 × 10−9

(90% C.L.)

PRL 122, 021802 (2019)

Page 23: Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly · 2020. 6. 3. · 35 m 480 m 5 m Cu ' ! e+ e K ! ⇡' ⌘ ! ⇡' Bergsma et.al., Phys. Lett., 157B, 5,6, p. 458 Bounds cover a large portion of

Samuel Homiller — [email protected] | Light Scalars and the KOTO Anomaly 23

KOTO RunsFrom Taku Yamanaka, KAON2019