8
Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart Heys & Dan Villa

Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels

Life in the Atacama Design ReviewDecember 19, 2003

Stuart Heys & Dan Villa

Page 2: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Description and Motivation

•Improve upon existing Hyperion drivetrain• Less backlash (no chains)• Higher efficiency (w.r.t. packaging as well as power)• Higher torque capacity• Higher top speed• Smaller part count (improved reliability)

•More appropriate wheel selection• Optimized interface to drivetrain • Wider contact patch for soft soils

Page 3: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Current Design

•Match motor/drive as closely as possible to speed and voltage requirements

•Custom wound motor

•Efficient, high torque capacity harmonic drive gearing

•Compact, lightweight thin section output bearings with reliable seals

•Entire drive assembly environmentally isolated

Page 4: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Drivetrain Packaging

•Complete drive system contained within axle

• Concealed wiring• Sealed motor and gearing

Page 5: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Single Wheel Testbed

•Single wheel testbed created to qualify drivetrain and wheel options

• Power data used to confirm new motor selection• 3 Wheels tested

• Existing Hyperion bicycle wheel (26x1.75”)• Motorcycle wheel (28x3”)• Large diameter bicycle wheel (27.5x3”)

• Drivetrain to be prototyped and endurance tested

early 2004

Page 6: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Initial Wheel Tests

48V: Average Power vs. Weight

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Weight (kg)

Avera

ge P

ow

er

(W)

Wheel 1, 0.15 m/s

Wheel 1, 0.30 m/s

Wheel 1, 0.45 m/s

Wheel 2, 0.15 m/s

Wheel 2, 0.30 m/s

Wheel 2, 0.45 m/s

(speeds are commanded speeds, not necessarily attained, especially at 0.45 m/s)

Page 7: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Closing in on Zoe Wheel…

Power vs. Weight

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Weight (kg)

Avera

ge P

ow

er

(W)

15 cm/s

30 cm/s

45 cm/s

Page 8: Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Zöe Drivetrain & Wheels Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003 Stuart

Carnegie MellonLife in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003

Recommendations

•24” bicycle rim with 3” wide tire combined with custom machined hub•Slightly smaller in diameter than Hyperion wheel

•Custom hub allows for optimized wheel mounting

•Low weight

•Short integration time

•Simple, reliable solution

•Further testing to be done with mock-up of new drive system on single wheel testbed (new wheel, motor, gearing, amp)•100km endurance test to insure reliability

•Custom wheel designs may be considered if time allows