1
LHCb VELO: Performance and Radiation Damage in LHC Run I and Preparation for Run II Tomasz Szumlak, Agnieszka Obłąkowska-Mucha, AGH UST Kraków on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 13th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors, 24-30 May 2015 The LHCb Spectrometer at L0 Trigger Level: min.bias : : 250 : 20 : 1 VELO Performance during Run I The LHCb VELO The LHCb detector at LHC (JINST 3 2008 S08005) Radiation damage Preparation for Run II Vertex Locator Dipole magnet TT+IT (Silicon Tracker) Calorimeters Muon system RICH detectors 15mrad OT LHCb is dedicated for studying heavy flavour physics Single arm spectrometer geometry Fully instrumented in rapidity range << The most precise tracking system at LHC Full detector readout is performed at 1.1 MHz Performance summary VELO (vertex locator) Tracker HCAL ECAL RICH ~20 ℎℎ = 0.4 − 0.6% ~ 70% ⨁9% ~ 10% ⨁1% → ~95% → ~5% Silicon micro-strip vertex detector Two retractable detector halves One half comprises of 21 stations Each station has a R- and -type sensor Operates in secondary vacuum – separated from the LHC vacuum by 300 foil cooling system – working point @ sensors are kept @ Performance of the LHCb VELO (JINST 9 2014 P09007) Signal and Noise Resolutions Using the ADC distribution fit Landau Gauss function in order to retrieve MPV for signal and noise value Typical noise across the VELO ~ 1.6 – 2 ADC counts (depending on sensor position and type) Average signal to noise ratios measured for the VELO: ≈ 19 ≈ 21 -sensor Single hit resolution – linear dependence on strip pitch for a given projected angle range - the best resolution @LHC: ~ Primary Vertex resolution ~ 69 (13) for z (x,y) respectively for 25 tracks Impact Parameter resolution – critical for trigger performance – amounts to ~ 12 for high momentum tracks Single hit resolution PV resolution IP resolution Bulk current increases with delivered luminosity Typical increase amounts to roughly ~. / All silicon sensors operating at the same bias voltage of Good agreement with theory Effective depletion voltage decrease with fluence Minimum of ~ observed @ ~ . × Overall good agreement with the Hamburg Model – the apparent departure related to small electric field Fully operational VELO replacement has been built - in case of accident or some unexpected radiation damage related problem Need to define new procedures for CCE More aggressive approach to calibration scans – done on daily basis is not going to be uniform across sensors – careful monitoring needed Operation with different bias voltage for different sensors envisaged Radiation damage in LHCb VELO (JINST 8 2013 P08002) well below 500 V! We can operate the VELO successfully till the end of the Run II

LHCb VELO: Performance and Radiation Damage in LHC Run I ... · VELO Performance during Run I The LHCb VELO The LHCb detector at LHC (JINST 3 2008 S08005) Radiation damage Preparation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LHCb VELO: Performance and Radiation Damage in LHC Run I ... · VELO Performance during Run I The LHCb VELO The LHCb detector at LHC (JINST 3 2008 S08005) Radiation damage Preparation

LHCb VELO: Performance and Radiation Damage in LHC Run I and Preparation for Run II

Tomasz Szumlak, Agnieszka Obłąkowska-Mucha, AGH UST Krakówon behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

13th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors, 24-30 May 2015

The LHCb Spectrometer

at L0 Trigger Level:min.bias : 𝒄 𝒄 : 𝒃 𝒃

250 : 20 : 1

VELO

Performance during Run I

The LHCb VELO

The LHCb detector at LHC (JINST 3 2008 S08005)

Radiation damage Preparation for Run II

Vertex Locator

Dipole magnet

TT+IT (Silicon Tracker)

Calorimeters

Muon system

RICH detectors

15mrad

OT

LHCb is dedicated for studying heavy flavour physics

Single arm spectrometer geometry

Fully instrumented in rapidity range 𝟐 < 𝜼 < 𝟓

The most precise tracking system at LHC

Full detector readout is performed at 1.1 MHz

Performance summary

• VELO (vertex locator)

• Tracker

• HCAL

• ECAL

• RICH

𝜎𝐼𝑃~20 𝜇𝑚𝑓𝑜𝑟 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑝𝑇 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑠

𝛿𝑝

𝑝= 0.4 − 0.6%

𝜎𝐸𝐸~

70%

𝐸𝐺𝑒𝑉⨁9%

𝜎𝐸𝐸~

10%

𝐸𝐺𝑒𝑉⨁1%

휀 𝐾 → 𝐾 ~95%𝜋 → 𝐾 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝐼𝐷 ~5%

Silicon micro-strip vertex detector

Two retractable detector halves

One half comprises of 21 stations

Each station has a R- and 𝝓-type sensor

Operates in secondary vacuum – separated from the LHC vacuum by 300 𝝁𝒎 foil

𝑪𝑶𝟐 cooling system – working point @−𝟑𝟎𝒐

sensors are kept @−𝟏𝟎𝒐

Performance of the LHCb VELO (JINST 9 2014 P09007)

Signal and Noise

Resolutions

Using the ADC distribution fit Landau ⨂ Gauss function in order to retrieve MPV for signal and noise value

Typical noise across the VELO ~ 1.6 – 2 ADC counts (depending on sensor position and type)

Average signal to noise ratios measured for the VELO:

𝑆

𝑁𝑅

≈ 19𝑆

𝑁𝜙

≈ 21

𝝓-sensor

Single hit resolution – linear dependence on strip pitch for a given projected angle range

- the best resolution @LHC: ~ 𝟒 𝝁𝒎

Primary Vertex resolution ~ 69 (13) 𝝁𝒎 for z (x,y) respectively for 25 tracks

Impact Parameter resolution – critical for trigger performance – amounts to ~ 12 𝝁𝒎 for high momentum tracks

Single hit resolution

PV resolution

IP resolution

Bulk current increases with delivered luminosity

Typical increase amounts to roughly ~𝟏. 𝟗 𝝁𝑨/𝒑𝒃−𝟏

All silicon sensors operating at the same bias voltage of 𝟏𝟓𝟎 𝑽

Good agreement with theory

Effective depletion voltage 𝑽𝑬𝑫decrease with fluence

Minimum of 𝑽𝑬𝑫~ 𝟏𝟖 𝐕 observed

@ ~ 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟏𝟎𝟏𝟑 𝒏𝒆𝒒𝒄𝒎−𝟐

Overall good agreement with the Hamburg Model – the apparent departure related to small electric field

Fully operational VELO replacement has been built

- in case of accident or some unexpected radiation damage related problem

Need to define new procedures for CCE

More aggressive approach to calibration scans – done on daily basis

𝑽𝑬𝑫 is not going to be uniform across sensors – careful monitoring needed

Operation with different bias voltage for different sensors envisaged

Radiation damage in LHCb VELO (JINST 8 2013 P08002)

𝑽𝑬𝑫 well below 500 V!

We can operate the VELO successfully till the end of the Run II