Upload
liseli
View
274
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LGU Scorecard for Health 2010. What is the LGU Scorecard for Health ?. Why is there a Need for the LGU report card?. LGU REPORT CARD. Action Points. Internal Benchmark Compare performanceto previous year . Improving. Maintain. Prioritize. Not Improving. Maintain Current Level. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
LGU Scorecard for Health
2010
What is the LGU Scorecard for Health ?
Why is there a Need for the LGU report card?
Internal Benchmark
Compare performanceto previous year
LGU REPORT CARD
Improving
Not Improving
Equal to Last Year
No Data
Action Points
=
External Benchmark•Compare performance to
2010 target •Compare performance to
2006 National Average
ExcellentEqual To or
Higher Than 2010 Target
GoodEqual To or
Higher Than 2006 Nat’l. Ave.
FairLower Than 2006
Nat’l. Ave.
Action Points
Maintain Current Level
Maintain Current Progress
Prioritize
LGU REPORT CARD
Performance Indicators
Set I Performance Indicators is composed of 29 indicators representing priority Programs, Projects and Activities of F1. They are mostly intermediate outcomes and assessed every year. Performance distribution or equity measures can be gauged.
Set II Performance Indicators is composed of 19 indicators representing major thrusts and key interventions for each F1 pillar. They are mostly system reform outputs and are assessed every 3-5 years. The equity dimension of these indicators shall not be measured.
LGU Scorecard Set I Performance
IndicatorsFILARIASIS (1)
SCHISTOSOMIASIS (1)
MALARIA (1) TUBERCULOSIS (2)
IMMUNIZATION (1) BREASTFEEDING (1)
UNDERWEIGHT CHILDREN (1)
FACILITY BASED DELIVERIES (1)/CPR
(1)
SAFE WATER AND SANITARY
TOILETS (2)HOSPITAL (3)
A. SERVICE DELIVERY = 15 INDICATORS
RHU ACCREDITATIONOut Patient Benefit
Maternity Care PackageTB DOTS (3)
Botika ng Barangay(1)
B. REGULATION = 4 INDICATORS
PHILHEALTH ENROLLMENT (2)
PROVINCIAL BUDGET FOR HEALTH (1)
MUNICIPAL BUDGET FOR HEALTH (1) MOOE FOR HEALTH (1)
C. FINANCING = 5 INDICATORS
DOCTORS MIDWIVES
(2)
PROCUREMENT Annual Financing
Utilized (2)AUDIT (1)
D. GOVERNANCE = 5 INDICATORS
DATA SOURCES
DATA SOURCENUMBER OF LGU
SCORECARD INDICATORS
FHSIS 11 LGU RECORDS (BUDGET DOCUMENTS & HOSPITAL) 12
NATIONAL NUTRITION COUNCIL
1
PHIC RECORDS 5 T O T A L 29
PERFORMANCE GAUGES
Performance Level is measured by the PWHS Average Performance of component municipalities are
averaged out to represent performance of the PWHS
Performance Distribution is measured by the distribution of performance in municipalities Performance of Highest and Lowest
Municipality
Basis for Financial Allocation
LGU Scorecard Performance Results shall be
the basis for Variable Tranche Allocation to PWHS
Internal Benchmark - 40% of the AOP SLA Variable Tranche
External Benchmark - 60 % of the AOP SLA Variable Tranche
Data ProcessI. Municipal Level
II. Provincial & Regional Levels
III. Provincial Level DILG Encoders
IV. National Level-BLGS-DILG
V. National Level-BLHD-DOH
LGU Scorecard Data Capture Forms
Official Automated Forms used for LGU Scorecard:
DatPagea Capture Form for Provinces & Certificate
Data Capture Form for Municipalities & Certificate Page
Data Capture Form for HUCs and ICCs & Certificate Page
Roles and Responsibilities of Major Stakeholders
A.Municipal Health Offices (MHOs) The Municipal Health Officer or the Public
Health Nurse (OIC) shall review, & validate the consolidated barangay data to ensure quality of information.
Facilitate meetings on LGU Scorecard for barangays under their jurisdiction.
Submit data to province thru the provincial health officer
Roles and Responsibilities of Major Stakeholders
B.Provincial Health Offices (PHOs) The Provincial Health Officer shall review, &
validate the consolidated PWHS data to ensure quality of information.
Facilitate meetings/conferences on LGU Scorecard for municipalities and component cities under their jurisdiction.
Sign the conforme form to ensure that both parties (PHO and CHD authorized representative) have agreed with the data reports.
Roles and Responsibilities
C. Centers for Health Development (CHDs) The designated CHD representative shall review,
& validate the consolidated PWHS data to ensure quality of information.
Facilitate meetings/conferences on LGU Scorecard for PWHS.
Sign the conforme form to ensure that both parties (PHO and CHD authorized representative) have agreed with the data reports.
D. BLGS-DILG C.1 Provincial Level (LGPMS-DILG)
Data encoding C.2 National Level (BLGS)
Processing and analysis of data Printing of LGU Report Cards
E. BLHD-DOH Analysis of data results Provide copies of national, regional and PWHS results to
health managers, LCEs, donors, other health stakeholders Provide venue for National ME3 Conference Disseminate information thru press releases of results on a
yearly basis in widely circulated newsprints. F. ME3 Steering Committee
Provide oversight functions in the implementation of the LGU Scorecard
Roles and Responsibilites
The 2010 LGU Report The 2010 LGU Report Card Card
National ResultsLGU Scorecard 2010
National Averages
Green Targets Peak
Performance
Indicator2006 200
7 2008 2009 2010
2010 Targe
tFilariasis
MDA 6868 6868 7676 6969 63.1363.13 8585Schistoso
miasis 16 16 2020 35 35 4343 55.2755.27 85 85 Malaria API (per 1000
population)1.421.42 1.551.55 1.021.02 1.671.67 1.061.06 <0.1<0.1
TB CDR 7272 7272 7070 6969 70.7570.75 7070TB CR 8181 8181 7878 7979 81.0481.04 8585 FIC 8484 8484 8686 8585 81.3381.33 9595
Initial Breast feed 6868 7272 7373 6868 65.6165.61 8585PEM 1212 1010 1212 1010 7.947.94 2424FBD 3333 3838 3838 4747 57.6257.62 7070CPR 3939 3939 3838 3838 37.0637.06 8585
20102010National National AverageAverage
SERVICE SERVICE DELIVERYDELIVERY
Indicator 2006 2007 2008 200
9 20102010 Targe
tSafe Water 8585 8686 8787 8282 84.984.9
44 9494Sanitary Toilet 7878 7979 7878 7878 80.0180.01 9191ALOS 33 33 33 33 3.543.54 55BOR 7171 7979 7878 7272 89.189.1
99 8585GDR 0.680.68 1.661.66 1.941.94 0.920.92 2.552.55 0.990.99
20102010National National AverageAverage
SERVICE SERVICE DELIVERYDELIVERY
4/15 GREENs
0 GREENs
Indicator 2006
2007
2008
2009 2010
2010
Target
OPB ACCREDITATION 4949 5757 5656 6565 65.665.6
99 8080
MCP ACCREDITATION 1313 1414 1717 1414 23.5723.57 9090
TB ACCREDITATION 2323 2929 3434 3636 43.343.3
22 5050
BOTICA NG BGY 1:41:499 1:131:13 1:71:7 1:71:7 1:81:8 1:21:2
20102010National National AverageAverage
REGULAREGULATIONTION
20102010National National AverageAverage
FINANCFINANCINGING
1/5
Indicator 2006
2007
2008
2009 2010
2010
Target
Total Enrolled (NHIP) 4646 4747 5858 9090 NO NO
DATADATA 8585Sponsored Enrolled (NHIP)
106106 6565 8585 8585 92.8192.81 100100
Prov. Health Budget (%) 2020 1616 1717 2222 22.822.8
66 2222Municipal Health Budget (%)
88 88 99 1111 11.511.577 1515
MOOE for Health (%) 2020 2222 2323 2323 25.725.7 4545GREEN
0 GREEN
Indicator 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2010 Targ
etDoctor to Pop. Ratio (1: )
32,6332,6333
31,8931,8977
31,0431,0499
30,9830,9822
35,0935,0900
20,0020,0000
Midwife to Pop. Ratio (1: )
5,1345,134 5,1095,109 5,7665,766 6,6056,605 6,3976,397 5,0005,000
Public Bidding 8282 9292 8989 8686 86.086.0
99 100100
Financing Utilized 7979 8787 8181 8484 87.487.4
99 100100Audit Objections Cleared
5252 5454 9191 9393 28.328.399 100100
20102010National National AverageAverage
GOVERNGOVERNANCEANCE
2010 ResultsContinuing ImprovementsContinuing Improvements
SERVICE DELIVERY
2010 ResultsContinuing ImprovementsContinuing Improvements
REGULATION
2010 ResultsContinuing ImprovementsContinuing Improvements
FINANCING
Service Delivery
National (97
LGUs)
F16
F15 F44 ARM
M NCR
Filariasis MDA 11 11 00 00 00
Schistosomiasis 66 33 22 00 11
Malaria API 2121 55 66 1010 00TB CDR 4646 1010 1111 1616 00 99TB CR 4141 88 99 1717 11 66 FIC 1515 44 00 77 00 44
Initial Breast feed 55 11 00 22 00 22PEM 8989 1616 1515 4141 33 1717FBD 2626 33 22 99 00 1212CPR 11 00 00 00 00 11
2010 Results – Cities & PW
HS
Who Reached 2010 Targets
2010 Results – Cities & PW
HS
Who Reached 2010 Targets
Service Delivery
National (97 LGUs)
F16
F15
F44
ARMM
NCR
Safe Water 2525 55 00 77 00 1313Sanitary Toilet 1919 00 00 55 00 1414ALOS 7575 1414 1414 3939 22 88BOR 4545 1111 55 2121 00 88GDR 2020 44 44 77 00 55
2010 Results – Cities & PW
HS
Who Reached 2010 Targets
RegulationNational (97 LGUs)
F16
F15 F44 ARM
M NCR
OPB ACCREDITATION
4545 1212 66 2121 22 66MCP ACCREDITATION
77 22 00 00 00 55TB ACCREDITATION
4141 99 1111 1717 00 44
BOTICA NG BRGY 8282 1414 1414 4040 44 1010
2010 Results – Cities & PW
HS
Who Reached 2010 Targets
FinancingNational (97 LGUs)
F16
F15 F44 ARM
M NCR
Total Enrolled 00 00 00 00 00 00Sponsored Enrolled 3131 66 22 1919 00 44Prov. Health Budget (%) 3232 99 77 1616 00 00Municipal Health Budget (%)
1414 11 11 44 11 77
MOOE for Health (%) 33 00 11 00 00 22
2010 Results – Cities & PW
HS
Who Reached 2010 Targets
GOVERNANGOVERNANCECE
National(97
LGUs)
F16
F15 F44
ARMM NCR
Doctor to Population Ratio
2121 44 00 99 11 88Midwife to Population Ratio
3636 1010 1111 2222 11 22Public Bidding 1212 11 11 44 00 66Financing Utilized 1414 33 11 88 00 22Audit Objections Cleared
1212 22 22 55 11 22
PPA Performance Targets Reached by > 50% of Provinces
TB CDR
TB CR
PEM
ALOS
BOR
OPB
TB DOTS
BnB
Peak Performance 2010
TB CDR
Top Performers
FIC
Top Performers
FBD
Top Performers
Access to Safe Water
Top Performers
OPB
Top Performers
BnB
Top Performers
Consistent Top Performers(in 3 to 6 indicators)
Performance 2010
TB CDR
Low Performers
FIC
Low Performers
FBD
Low Performers
Access to Safe Water
Low Performers
OPB
Low Performers
BnB
Low Performers