Clea4eA To 4ein hea from Td old Weisberg, 4ing aseaseination records spee Deliberate nose-me:Sip-zee Department, ra rewriting f py actual requests

A copy of Deputy lour, 0//5 end of Director Kelley Te's) 12/2/75

letter to Ars Leear, both 44-38a61-60044 are attached* in each coos Ate Laser' address iS obliterated, which is prat y silly when ho is my eat /noel and these reeords were supposedly processed for 4E44 (While the MI particularly its #2040, have aeeerted wide variety of astional security claims., I was not aware that they had claezified

anhington ehone book.)

Until Lie. Tyler's letter my requests eau apeeeie gor• to 1969 were snored. i r. liar's letter re reeente the begineing of a continuing and deliberate

neee-occelience by meane of a weerittee of py regeeste. It also represaata factual

inaccuracies that led to nonecomplieneee.

Unless my actual requests are examined tbia will never a and

etili more nen-compliance The cost of the triok that began with has been eoeeiderable for all partioy, it was not becaune the Department FBI ware un- Mare lockase wr reaction to the Tyler letter Wiz~ prompt and vigorous* l insieted that my reqeasta be resPendod te, not the Depertmeat's subetitutione for there To late this haa not haepened.

hr. Tyler's letter refers to my request for resel of all 'balate

[it ee maw 1 of Kr. liais'eere mufti" (VcIge en4. witeie nalleer 1 of Mr. eiaberes (Plea 2) request foe *results of any balliaties teets,"/The Department delLberiateXt 4 sOt

comply. Inetoed iv decided, without asking mos, ea & use it boa not since ehev.2zed, of reeponding to other thou ray eotual requeet. :t momay decidee that when I said any I did not mean apy, that i 100113v only one "I haw not inieluded as Pet era for coeeiderae time the results of a geeat number of ballistics testa performed on rifles other than the one owned by eas then told that if T meant what I aaii to begin all

over algae, o back to So re 1 of 1969. (When thereefter I aaked the Fl for the sulta of these other testa it told me there were none, that the other rifles listed

were listed oray for inforiational zrposea relatine to aaliber.)

WI 4

As a rosult as of June 079 I do not h - the ihforcer"oa tile Tyler to Ott itself

quota=; mo 35 aked. for end t-4 half $Tgare after the Tyler letter:

At the top of page 2 it'. Tyler s atea incerrectli that the FB's eke-When portray'

Rey: as there ever were any other suspects in the ouzo: The has asetchee

of 4r: Hay and in the first two wee4s the ra rose I have =mined beast

having identified acs 400 suspects: And so were art at 6quare1 with this item also:

If on sippea the Department does no =ore than -Peat th 2EX's untrue represents,:

tier s the per isappeal is n sere than a rubber stamp t.

The next zsatter in the same paragraph of Ar. yler's letter illustrates this

furthers 'It may be that the per' et has no photocraphs taken at the scene of the

crime' tam number 6 of the mqueat j, in the sense ,,oar client uusa the phrase, To the

limited extent that we have *stographie and *the materials that depict physical

Conditions or event: they will be roleseed to 1r. Weiaberg.'

liehOdY deiced rse if I intended any sense" other than of &la phs of the

f the crime - which elso inalodeo ofousaa.

In fact the Dowtsant knou of oodh sholopapha b . f use in the =tradition.

In Sect any awaking of the VBX40 indices IOWA be disclosed the of

photographs of the scene of the crime, Instead o doing its own appeals work the

Dpertmee took the FIZ'a word: An a result the ?BL aware that an examination of the

reorder wbiah,dingUagn the existence of Wsse photographs does Asa disclose any such

. phOtognaphe. And rather than au being released to ue the Departaaut has °outset0d

the Order of the Court that copies of the Imo photographs he provided me

Here I depart !rem the Tyler letter for an e planation that Inlay be holpVul to you:

Once I boom to prove that the Fa's of were falsely sworn thw grew

1 taat "vvidc afflAvalts« It rtended none, from any source, include Imes Inc.

and GeldsniK, to ototablizh awneraM-P, agencY or copyright with regard to Aotographa

taken litu. at the 00C44 of the criLe at the of thecxi because he

for 21,1,-414x To not i rte, as aAlotegmpber: Uhmoom ttmo flaw

ror:1 tha

-e oaly fr

.sia,..ra.blu

have exatilnea thou and obtailad Bpi,

to 71y reposated inqUirloa ono ims rofmaed to

inalude claiw

t rake

flux. (it

b.th false.

ilisz for met)

.1M ttt A

used

tz et court in Mom-phis when I made thie rAuest AG annt

to chief Munroe

-with pr:vide YOu - 15 itif_

hi or Time and of 'which

losed,

• 1 ob hom from

TO trosildU in

Jo Pr

e by no we fro

to e suNeot expert.

these aro partial enlargements of the original PhotograP1

Aa by a nubjuotiexpert or by one

her limitations it is obvious that

of the orine -of the FBI's

T.

ation of o tbe body. VeTIOna of the

'la

for the

FBI. C

public as a result of

s LZehe overDr. Ring bo4y, :arst to each

t 17.ot uhi rerAis Piele Office wooer n for the a

Ind to ua:est a oo, to M., *

thri thouv

p his wo a.

4

Because Ido not presuee that the Di.G made his own exaeeleation of Fe : indloos and

ids I do preens that what follows, a street:lit-out lie, oomee fro the FBI, not

from the Dee's awn knowledge/ "Similarle, as to item number 7 of the request, no

*information, doeuments, or reports eade available to any author or writer* can be

identified as such in our records." (There are innumerable instances of leaksOeuni

By coincides one of the records I had not been able to eet to until lase night

is precisely such e record, of a leak to the New York Times that coral have ooze from

the FBI only, as the eeepa record states. The MURKIN records thng do disclose that

there is what the Fel told the DAG there is not, besides what is outside of YeeXIN

filing, a matter of which I have inforeed y u in earlier appeals.

(In addition to what I have provided with appeals have provided examplee of

such essietanee to eyee*hantee 'writers in affidavits in this and o=Wher cases.

Assad on0 what the Fle had to know is thin dellberate lie the DAG denied and then

claimed be ume net deneing to frustrete further appeal: "Based on the foreOxineOlete.

I have ludod thet the are no records within the scope... There can, of course,

be no denial ot =aeon where there is no record; there can be do appeal where there

has beoe no d: , of aceees.w

to lees legeliatic It :leave tide ar nt is thet the Fell aen lie its bead off and

because the DAG tihmee to believe &eel net in any way to question its lying there is no

F}le aid no rigeta ender Au.

Aid seeks ap;oal aa i.twas the Aot it wettle t, te.

The likelihood of this latter reaching the Directat of the FBI, working its way

through that additional reil stem and reaching Be Morse Wiseman in tine for him to

draft and eail the/mooed record attached hereto as the very next day, apeare to be

rather low. a more likely explenatiom of_thie uUdden haste after as mazy years in the

fear of being clobbered an the air to citu.or, which feled a later request for only some

of the ieforeation (iit le as that wan) disclosed with these letters to ow counsel.

(Bete also the copy in the AMIN file apesars not to be th*, Lelia one, with inele

cation on

tribution is much more sP:sal dated

ye terday also was the recipient a es 11

SA Wiseman appears to have drafted t< etter of i 7 for the Director 'o

t This means that bki rats avers of the entente =As letter. Be-

in this matter

d the records

of the rlishoneoty

ad be 110 doubt of

In DI 84 nor

tire Weir.

ctausc was then tha POIA su

he requests, the se

Ehglash this means he had personal male

While i have 40 knowledge of the means by which the DAG was given untruthful informa-

tion the PAZ Innocence on the tart of the supervisor does not seem to be possible.

Among the many notations sad stamps added to this copy theme are some that refer

to Yhere other records are. I boliov that Otellimses in the King7ease as 11 as JO'

of all notations or whore they indicate.

B 12/06. file member is nited.) This apAers tee

and Of that to lett B.

C

tax P in mooing0004 shoe

that there vas a pending trial after

vas alleged shoo my

him kintig MOM

in IN/ elitlier

for you on:̀ thr gh to

you the Delmainwnt aftlat b uwaxe of the at has by now cost a considerable

amount of time ono money without

the; '4 kJ. Waimea being at

all close. Moreavr, inforzetLon that

' bi.:gip,ind with the

PA request r arse

It particular I ci

refer for

. to in

r%tvIting MY reqUests *4

it had been rennet by federal di

1 Sas also hie zsel a1.4 when at

ail04011. As& easiest biai. Bow this c

An which I vas arat in of this

explanations I provide are intended to eke it

44A

2/1/75 lesimor remains withhold to this-day.. This iL; a 13 of which I amid prefer

is not proud. It is, hows to , she otu l record

served or )er €3tsa c> vhe Departure t.

4, able to bellow:, the