3
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers Faculty of Social Sciences 2017 Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy Gai M. Lindsay University of Wollongong, [email protected] Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Publication Details Lindsay, G. M. (2017). Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy. Australian Teacher Magazine, 22 1.

Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy

University of WollongongResearch Online

Faculty of Social Sciences - Papers Faculty of Social Sciences

2017

Let's address low visual arts self-efficacyGai M. LindsayUniversity of Wollongong, [email protected]

Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library:[email protected]

Publication DetailsLindsay, G. M. (2017). Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy. Australian Teacher Magazine, 22 1.

Page 2: Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy

Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy

AbstractVisual arts pedagogy and the place of visual arts in the curriculum are determined by the collision of teachers'visual arts self-efficacy beliefs, pedagogical beliefs about children's learning processes and visual arts contentknowledge.

Keywordslow, visual, let's, arts, address, self-efficacy

DisciplinesEducation | Social and Behavioral Sciences

Publication DetailsLindsay, G. M. (2017). Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy. Australian Teacher Magazine, 22 1.

This journal article is available at Research Online: http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/3183

Page 3: Let's address low visual arts self-efficacy

Opinion / Hard Word22 • Australian Teacher Magazine • October 2017

FIND OUT MORE AT SPINAL.COM.AU

Let’s address low visual arts self-effi cacyTHE HARD WORD

VISUAL arts pedagogy and the place of visual arts in the curric-ulum are determined by the col-lision of teachers’ visual arts self-efficacy beliefs, pedagogical beliefs about children’s learning process-es and visual arts content knowl-edge. Recent research has found that educators with limited visu-al arts knowledge, developmental-ly limiting beliefs about children’s capacity for visual arts learning and low personal visual arts self-effi-cacy were more likely to abdicate the role of planning for and teach-ing art to a colleague they consider to be ‘more arty’ than themselves. When that was not possible, rath-er than present open-ended visu-al arts learning experiences using a range of quality visual arts media and processes, some research par-ticipants selected close-ended,

mass-produced, teacher-directed arts activities perceived to be enter-taining and easy to implement.

Low visual arts self-effica-cy amongst teachers impacts the beliefs and capacity of the next gen-eration to explore ideas and com-municate through visual and graph-ic languages. Indeed, the very edu-cation system that should be open-ing doors for children to access and embrace learning through multi-ple intelligences, including visual arts appreciation and making, is tragically the very context in which many people stop believing that they are artistic or creative.

It is ironic that while most teach-ers readily expound the belief that artistic and cultural experiences are important for children, many of these same teachers concurrent-ly state that they are not person-ally artistic or creative. They mis-takenly position artistic ability as a somehow naturally developing skill that few people are lucky enough to acquire. Perhaps such beliefs com-fort teachers lacking confidence in their own visual arts knowledge and capacity to teach visual arts skills? After all, if visual arts abilities supposedly develop by chance, per-haps the abdication of intentional teaching is more easily excused?

Low visual arts self-effica-cy beliefs often stem from child-

hood and schooling experiences. Perhaps you recall only doing art as a smorgasbord of production-line templates on Friday afternoons? Or, perhaps like many adults, you can vividly recall the moment when a carelessly placed criticism forever damaged your visual arts self-con-fidence? John Dewey identified the power of “collateral learning,” where the development of future attitudes and desires for learning are pro-foundly strengthened or weakened by experience. He writes that if the desire for learning is compromised, “The pupil is actually robbed of native capacities which otherwise would enable him to cope with the circumstances that he meets in the course of his life”.

The Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 31) states that children of all ages have the right to both access and fully participate in cultural and artistic life. If we truly aim to nurture and educate the next generation of holistic think-ers, communicators and problem solvers we must value, model and teach visual forms of learning and expression. As defenders of chil-dren’s rights, teachers have a duty to ensure that children’s right to learn the visual language of art is not compromised or even perma-nently compromised by their own lack of confidence in the visual arts

domain or by the mistaken belief that visual arts learning is less aca-demic or important than learning in other domains.

It is therefore most important that teachers examine their own visu-al arts self-efficacy and appreciate that their personal visual arts expe-riences, attitudes and consequen-tial pedagogical choices will in turn influence their students’ visual arts learning, attitudes and confidence. To support personal and pedagog-ical reflection, teachers might con-sider the following questions:

Do I value the visual arts in my • teaching and curriculum plan-ning?Are visual arts learning experienc-• es integrated across the curricu-lum as a tool by which children are supported to explore, make meaning and express ideas?Are one-off arts and crafts activi-• ties only scheduled once a week as a therapeutic and fun activity to give children a ‘break’ from the

learning domains I think are valu-able or cognitively demanding?Do the visual arts learning expe-• riences offered provide children with opportunities to access and appreciate the work of practicing artists and to progressively learn a range of skills and techniques?Do I join children in the art-mak-• ing process as both a co-learner and co-teacher of arts skills and techniques?Are the experiences I routinely • offer selected to avoid mess and parent complaints about stained uniforms?Do the visual arts products chil-• dren create in my classroom show evidence of child choice and individual expression or do the children in my classroom make identical reproductions of template-guided, Pinterest-inspired activities?How will I foster and build my • own visual arts knowledge, skills and confidence?

If we truly aim to nurture and educate the next gen ... we must value, model and teach visual forms of learning and expression.

BY GAI LINDSAY

Lecturer, School of Education, University of Wollongong