Lessonplan Bi Tutor

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    1/34

    Masaryk University in BrnoPedagogical Fakulty

    Department of English

    Teaching Grammar at The Basic Schoolsaccording to

    The Framework Educational Programme

    Bachelor Thesis

    Brno 2006

    Supervisor: Author:PhDr. Helena Havlkov Jarmila abatov

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    2/34

    I. THEORETICAL PART

    1. Introduction

    2. The Framework Educational Programme

    2.1 The Framework Educational Programme in the Czech Republic2.2 Language communication2.3 Key competences2.4 Expected results in the language communication

    3. Grammar and the language curriculum

    3.1 Curriculum and communication

    3.2 The centrality of language3.3 The grammar- centred curriculum

    4. Identifying grammar

    4.1 What is grammar4.2 Grammar in language teaching

    5. Presenting and testing grammar

    5.1 Presenting grammatical items5.2 Discovery techniques5.2 Practice techniques5.3 Testing grammar5.4 My own conclusion of presenting grammar

    II. PRACTICAL PART

    6. The Framework Educational Programme and the SchoolEducational Programme

    6.1 Making the School Educational Programme6.2 The School Educational Programme for 6th class

    7. Grammatical units taken from the School EducationalProgramme

    7.1 The list of grammatical units7.2 Lesson plans for the main units

    2

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    3/34

    8. Teaching process

    8.1 Hypotheses about each lesson plan8.2 Evaluation and experience from the lesson

    9. Checking and testing knowledge

    9.1 Test for students9.2 Anticipation of possible problems9.3 Evaluation of the tests

    10. Conclusion

    10.1 Advantages and disadvantages of using the School EducationalProgramme

    3

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    4/34

    1. Introduction

    I have been teaching English at the basic school for ten years. My students are at the age

    from ten to fifteen. Basic education in the Czech Republic has been organized by severalstate educational and curriculum documents during the period that I have been teaching.

    Two years ago, in 2004, a new educational document for basic schools has been published.

    It is called the Framework Educational Programme. It offers a new view on our educational

    system. Main stress is put on results and competences not on subject matter during the

    process of education. It is obligatory for schools to make their School Educational

    Programmes. A school year 2007-8 has been established as the first year for realizing these

    new School Educational Programmes. Now it is the time for making them. This thesissolves this problem in connection with teaching grammar in English. The main aim of the

    thesis is to show how grammar could be taught.

    Theoretical part engages in this new document which is described here in details. Then

    grammar is characterized as a part of language teaching. Main types of presenting and

    testing grammar are mentioned here. Relationship between teaching grammar and language

    curriculum as a whole is explained in theoretical part too.

    Practical part firstly describes the process of making a new School Educational

    Programme. Then attention is put on the 6th class only. There is a table of subject matter

    developed from the School Educational Programme. Two lesson plans of main grammatical

    units are chosen for presenting grammar. There are hypotheses and evaluation for each

    lesson. In the last part there are tests for learners. Anticipations of possible problems are

    presented here, then evaluation of each test. Conclusion of this thesis comes out the

    advantages and disadvantages of the Framework Educational Programme for teachers and

    students.

    4

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    5/34

    2.1 The Framework Educational Programme in the CzechRepublic

    The national curriculum (also called the Educational Framework or the FrameworkEducational Programme) is the national educational document which was edited by VP

    in Prague in 2004. This document consists four parts.

    Part A specifies the national educational programme for the basic schools. Part B

    characterizes generally the basic education in the Czech Republic. Part C contains

    the key competences which are devided into some educational areas. There are ten

    main educational areas in part C.

    Teaching English language belongs to the part which is called Language and

    Language Communication. This chapter contains two parts; Czech language and

    literature and foreign languages.

    2.2 Language and language communication

    The educational part called Language and language communication is taken as to

    one of the most important part in the educational programme. A high level of

    language culture belongs to the basic items of general education. Language learning

    supplies knowledge and skills that provide possibilities to receive several

    messages , it makes pupils understand these messages, it makes them express new

    things properly. Students should be able to use and enforce the results of their

    knowledge. Foreign and the second foreign language contribute to understanding

    and discovering the realities that are above the experience brought by mother

    tongue. These realities provide the basis of language communication andassumptions for communication in a scope of integrated Europe and the world.

    The language acquisition helps to reduce a language barrier. It is useful for

    improving the mobility of the individuals both in their personal life and in their next

    professional carrier. The language acquisition enables pupils to know the

    differences of the traditions in foreign country. It intensifies the view of importance

    of reciprocal understanding and tolerance between countries. It facilitates

    cooperation between schools in the international projects. The requirements in

    5

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    6/34

    foreign language education, that were formulated in The National Curriculum of

    Basic Education in the Czech Republic, are based on the Common Europe

    Referential Scope for Languages (Spolen evropsk referenn rmec pro jazyky).

    This scope describes different levels of the language acquisition.

    2.3 The aims of the language communication

    The education in this area points to these key competences:

    pupils are expected:

    to receive language as a historical and cultural fact

    to know the historical and cultural development of the country and nation

    to make a positive view of mother tongue

    to use the language for receiving the information

    to require the main structures of communication between people

    to make a positive view of foreign language in a scope of multicultural

    communication

    to require the self confidence for presenting in public

    to be able to read the literary texts

    to make a positive view of the classic literature and other arts

    to require an emotional and esthetic cognition

    2.4 The expected results

    Level 1, the beginners, 1st period

    RECEPTIVE, PRODUCTIVE AND INTERACTIVE SKILLS

    A pupil

    pronounces correctly, reads with proper pronunciation

    6

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    7/34

    understands simple instructions, reacts on them

    recognizes written and spoken form of the word

    understands the meaning of simple, slow conversation

    uses alphabetical dictionary in a textbook

    RECEPTIVE SPEAKING SKILLS , 2nd period

    A pupil

    understands known words and simple sentences

    understands the meaning of simple authentic materials, uses them for hiswork

    reads loudly with proper pronunciation simple texts with known vocabulary

    finds out useful information in a simple text, makes the answer to the question

    uses dictionary

    PRODUCTIVE SPEAKING SKILLS

    A pupil

    forms grammatically correct written statement, short text, an answer to the

    statement

    products orally the context of simple text, writes simple text, products simple

    conversation

    changes short texts

    INTERACTIVE SPEAKING SKILLS

    A pupil

    reacts actively to the simple conversation, greets and says good bye to a friend,

    provides information

    7

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    8/34

    Level 2, the intermediate

    RECEPTIVE SPEAKING SKILLS

    A pupil

    reads loudly, fluently with a proper pronunciation

    understands the meaning of simple texts in the textbooks and in the authentic

    materials, finds known words and phrases in the texts

    understands simple and clear speech and conversation

    finds the possible meaning of the new words from the context

    uses a dictionary and finds the meaning of the words

    PRODUCTIVE SPEAKING SKILLS

    A pupil

    builds simple (written and spoken) statement about situation in daily life, infamily, at school and in other topics

    writes grammatically correct sentences, changes sentences and short texts

    briefly retells the story or the text

    asks for simple information

    INTERACTIVE SPEAKING SKILLS

    A pupil

    is able to speak in the common daily situations in a simple way

    3. Grammar and the language curriculum

    It has been suggested that the design of any language - teaching curriculum is

    conceived as constituting the answers to three interrelated questions; What is to be

    8

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    9/34

    learned? How is learning to be undertaken and achieved? To what extent is the

    former appropriate and the latter effective? (Breen and Candlin 1980, p. 89).

    3.1 Curriculum and communication

    There have been increasing efforts to bring curricular objectives into alignment with

    language-functional aims and learner- behaviour specifications. It has been found that the

    goals of language-teaching programmes are often articulated in terms of communicative

    competence, and much discussed in the pedagogic research literature are the so-called

    communicative approaches to language instruction. The fundamental premise of most

    such approaches is that the primary function of language is that of communication.

    Certainly, the viability of any communicative curriculum will need to be linked in

    important ways to the validity of this premise; yet the premise itself represents a beliefabout language function.

    (William E. Rutherford, 1987, p. 147)

    One well-known researcher, F.Newmeyer, has this to say:

    Obviously, communication is a function of language-perhaps, according to some

    plausible but still undervised scale, its most important function. But communication does

    not appear to be the only function of language. Language is used for thought, for problem

    solving, for play, for dreaming, for displays of group solidarity, for deception, for certain

    specialized literary modes such as represented speech,and possibly to fulfill an

    instinctive need for symbolic behaviour; in fact, language plays an integral role in

    virtually every conceivable human activity. Now one might, of course, choose to call all

    these attributes and abilities communication. But doing so, it seems to me, takes from

    the word communication any meaning other than acting human.

    ( Newmeyer 1983, p. 100)

    According to William E. Rutherford there is nothing of intrinsic language organization

    that can be identified, isolated, and abstracted away for curricular representation as the

    formal exponent of some set of communicative functions. Grammar is in no sense

    amenable to such procedures, and this is as true for product as for process-oriented

    concepts of language form. These observations argue then against any centrality within

    9

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    10/34

    the curriculum for systems of communication where decisions concerning grammatical

    focus are attendant upon communicative points of departure.

    3.2 The centrality of language

    Letting language itself be at the centre of the pedagogical plan would seem at first

    glance to represent nothing new. Possible difficulties in accepting the value of a

    language-centred pedagogical plan would very likely stem from what we already know of

    so many such attempts in the past- attempts whose apparent failure to lead to desired

    goals has more recently, in the eyes of some language professionals, discredited the

    notion of any kind of curricular prominence for language organization.

    William E. Rutherford says:

    There are two prime assumptions that are usually identifiable throughout the history

    of language-centred pedagogy. The first of these amounts to a belief about language, the

    second about teaching {learning}:

    1. the essence of language is an assemblage of hierarchically-arranged constructs;

    2. the essence of language teaching/learning is the direct imparting of those constructs

    by teacher to learner.

    3.3 The grammar-centred curriculum

    We can say that the learner has to be exposed to the data from which hypotheses may

    be formed and meaningful generalizations drawn. The exposure factor is a more crucial

    one than might be supposed; it becomes even more so where the classroom is the onlysource of target-language date. The need for making the data available to the learner

    therefore places a special burden of responsibility upon the language curriculum and

    language syllabus. The responsibility in curriculum planning has three parts to it :

    1) some kinds of decision must be made as to what aspects of the grammatical system

    are the major sources for data from which the learner may ascertain the most formal

    generalizations (data identification)

    10

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    11/34

    2) choice of language content must be such as to ensure the sufficiently timely

    appearance of the grammatical aspects identified in 1

    3) great care and sensibility must be exercised that the pedagogical instruments

    maximize the probabilities for learner receptivity.

    The complexity of language means that if someone learns language, it requires

    systematic direct contact with each of its possible constructions. It cannot be necessary for

    the learner to encounter the exhaustive set of target-language constructions. One of the

    primary responsibilities of the language-teaching curriculum would seem to become as

    close as possible an identification of the grammar properties of target-language lexicon. It

    is considered of crucial importance for learner projection to well-formed grammatical

    constructions.

    4. Identifying grammar

    4.1 What is grammar

    TheLongman Dictionary of Contemporary English defines grammar as the rules by

    which words change their forms and are combined into sentences. There are two basic

    elements in this definition: the rules of grammar; and the study and practice of the rules.The rules of grammar are about how words change and how they are put together into

    sentences. The knowledge of grammar also tells the learner what to do if he wants to put

    the some phrase into the sentence. Grammar should be called the way in which words

    change themselves and group together to make sentences. (Jeremy Harmer, 1991, p. 1)

    4.2 Grammar in language teaching

    Each teacher should think about these facts and try to answer these questions beforeteaching grammar:

    1) Children do not learn grammar rules when they acquire their first language, so do

    they need to learn the rules of grammar when they acquire the second language?

    2) Pupils need or need not to be given details of grammar rules to study English

    successfully.

    11

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    12/34

    3) Should pupils get enough chance to practice using a language or should they learn

    grammar?

    4) Should students be aware of grammatical information about the language?

    A good teacher has several possibilities how to teach grammar. There is a number oftechniques for presenting and practicing grammar. According to J.Harmer the

    grammatical information can be given to students in two major ways. The first one could

    be extremely covert and the second will be made extremely overt.

    Covert grammar teaching means that grammatical facts are hidden from the students-

    even though they are learning the language. Students may be asked to do any activity

    where a new grammar is presented or introduced, but their attention will be drawn to this

    activity not to the grammar.

    Overt grammar teaching means that the teacher actually provides the students

    grammatical rules and explanations-the information is openly presented.

    With overt teaching grammatical rules are explicitly given to students, but with covert

    teaching students are simply asked to work with new language to absorb grammatical

    information which will help them to acquire the language as a whole.

    It is expected to do a lot of structures in teaching and practicing, and less really free

    communicative activity at the beginner level. The teaching of grammar is likely to be

    fairly covert since the main aim is to get students to use language as much as possible. On

    the other hand students at intermediate levels should be involved in more communicative

    activities and should have less grammar teaching. The teaching grammar would probably

    be more overt. Then advanced students can actively study grammar in more overt ways.

    5. Presenting and testing grammar

    5.1 Presenting grammatical items

    Presentation means that students are introduced to the form, meaning and use of a new

    piece of language (e.g. did for past simple in questions). Students can learn how to put the

    new syntax, words and sounds together. They learn grammar that they will need for their

    most important experience, applying it to themselves. It is useful to mention thepersonalization, which means using a piece of grammar to say things which really mean

    12

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    13/34

    something to learner. (e.g. using present simple to say what he does). Presentation can

    take place using personalization immediately, teacher uses the students and their lives to

    introduce a new language ( e.g. personal questions). Personalization can be the final part

    of a presentation which is done through the use of texts or pictures (e.g. using a situation

    in daily life, menu in a restaurant).

    J. Harmer speaks about some characteristics of a good presentation that should be

    mentioned here:

    a good presentation should be clear ( no difficulties in understanding for learner)

    a good presentation should be efficient (students can manipulate the new language)

    a good presentation should be lively and interesting (to get interest for students,their involving during a presentation)

    a good presentation should be appropriate (not put so much information)

    a good presentation should be productive (the introduced situation should allow

    students to make many sentences or questions with a new language)

    5.2 Discovery techniques

    We have said that a good presentation should be clear, efficient, lively and interesting,

    appropriate and productive. These can be fulfilled by many ways that are given to

    students by teacher. It is only up to teacher how he, she introduces the new grammatical

    item. Then students repeat and use this new item. Discovery techniques are possible ways

    where students are given examples of language and then asked to find out how they work,

    it means to discover the grammar rules. Students find out how grammar is used in a text

    and they are actually acquiring a grammar rule. By this students involving in the task of

    grammar acquisition teacher makes sure that they are concentrating fully, using their

    cognitive powers. Discovery techniques are not just the teacher telling what the grammar

    is. Students are actually discovering information for themselves.

    5.3 Practice techniques

    There are various ways of doing practice techniques, which means that pupils do

    exercise through the techniques which get them to practice grammatical item. There will

    13

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    14/34

    be mentioned four different types of oral practice and written practice too, which are

    described by J.Harmer.

    1) Drills are often done with the whole class, students are given sentence with a new

    grammatical item and they are asked for right repetition. It is practiced as long as it is

    necessary for students to be able to say this structure in a proper way. The aim of drill is

    to give students rapid practice in using a structural item. Advantage is that the teacher can

    correct any mistakes, can encourage pupils to concentrate on difficulties. But this way is

    not very creative.

    2) Interaction activities are the ways of language practicing which are more

    meaningful and more enjoyable. Pupils often work together in pairs or in groups. They

    exchange information in the purposeful and interesting way. They are given somematerials (text, picture, map) and asked for some tasks when they use the grammatical

    item that is introduced. Disadvantage should be that the teacher has no control over all

    students. He, she cant be sure that all students understood the grammar.

    3) Involving the personality is the way when pupils do the exercise and at the same

    time talk about themselves. They are asked to discuss things that involve their personality

    and to use this subject matter as a focus for grammar practice. Chain drill is one way of

    making a practice drill. It is closely drill but in more funny and enjoyable way. It is more

    interesting than usual, because students are asked for speaking about themselves.

    4) Games are surely the most interesting and the most favourite way how to practice

    grammar. Games are very useful for grammar work. Students are given a new

    grammatical item through the game, which is exactly the most natural way especially for

    children. There are several types of grammar games that will be mentioned later in this

    work.

    These were oral activities for practicing grammar. But there are some written activities

    too. Since grammar practice is often done through writing, it is very useful too. Some

    types of written practices will be mentioned here. These are fill-ins, written drills, word

    order, parallel writing. Generally speaking, students need to practice their grammar a lot,

    but it is only up to the teacher how they will do it. A good teacher should remember that

    students would do the tasks with pleasure not only as a necessity.

    14

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    15/34

    5.4 Testing grammar

    It has been said that pupils would do the exercises with pleasure and in a funny way.

    But it is quite difficult to test grammar in the same way. However it is difficult, it is

    possible. There are several types of tests. Teacher can test students ability to speak or

    write, his reading or listening skills. Of course, written tests take less time and they are

    easier to administer. Thats why most tests are based on written skills. This could cause

    some problems, because so much teaching in the classroom is based on oral work.

    Teacher should remember this fact and try to make the tests suitable for students. Good

    test shows both teacher and learner how well they are all doing. Teacher who writes tests

    should bear in mind the rules that are offered by J.Hamer:

    do not test what you have not taught

    do not test general knowledge

    do not introduce new techniques in tests

    do not just test accuracy

    do not forget to test the test

    5.4 Own conclusion of presenting grammar

    All grammar teaching should not be covert. Teacher should not always draw students

    attention to grammatical facts and rules. Sometimes pupils should discover facts about

    grammar through problem solving activities and sometimes through practicing grammar.

    Teacher should not think that the only best kind of grammar practice is written grammarpractice. Teacher should remember that it is not good to test grammar only with accuracy.

    The main point in teaching grammar is based on the fact that children do not learn

    grammar when they acquire first language, so it could work when they learn the second

    language.

    15

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    16/34

    II. PRACTICAL PART

    6. The Framework Educational Programme and The School

    Educational Programme

    6.1 Making The School Educational Programme

    The Framework Educational Programme has been done generally for all basic schools in

    our republic. It has been developed as an educational document by the Institute of

    Education in Prague. This document is obligatory direction for making the own school

    programme. Each school in the Czech Republic has to make its own School EducationalProgramme, which will come from the national form of the document. Each School

    Educational Programme is expected to be a little different.

    Firstly, the headmaster puts together several groups of teachers according to their

    qualification. It means that teachers who belong to the same educational area will work

    together. Teaching English belongs to the educational area which is called Language

    and Language Communication. Thats why the teachers of Czech, English, German,

    Russian and other foreign languages will work on this area together.

    Each group of teachers is asked to solve several problems. They should evaluate the

    position of a school, its advantages and disadvantages, its offers, its educational aims,

    projects etc. Then the teachers make the list of expected school results and knowledge,

    which has to come from the Framework Educational Programme and its key

    competences. They are free in choosing the subject matter. This will be set up

    according to the expected school results. At the end they make a table for each form,which will contain all these points. This is a very hard work for teachers, if they want to

    do it the best way. It takes a lot of their free time. The final product should be used as an

    educational programme for this specific area.

    6.2 The School Educational Programme 6th class

    According to The School Educational Programme there is a table of educational

    contents for 6th

    class, English language. (appendix n. 1)

    16

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    17/34

    This table functions both as an educational and a time plan for each teacher at school. It

    should be binding for teachers. It is only a part of the School Educational Programme but

    it is the most useful part for teachers of English.

    This table consists five columns:

    expected results and the key competences according to the Framework Educational

    Programme - the key competences are characterized here, some of the expected results

    taken from FEP are put here.

    expected results according to the School Educational Programme - the specific

    results are described here, these results were made by the teachers and they are the

    most important part of this document, they are binding for teachers and teaching.

    subject matter coming from expected results - there is a list of grammatical units that

    should be taught and the list of topics that should be solved during a school year, the

    subject matter is optional for each school.

    evaluation, it is optional - it is prepared for teachers notes, experience, evaluative

    points for the next work, there could be mentioned a students and teachers portfolio.

    notes, it is optional too - there are methods and forms of work described, this is theplace for noting and realizing relationship between the subjects, subjects should fade

    into one another.

    7. Grammatical units taken from the School Educational

    Programme

    7.1 The list of grammatical units

    There is solved and described teaching grammar according to the Framework

    Educational Programme in this thesis. Each school has to respect FEP and each teacher

    should respect the School Educational Programme. It has been said that the expected

    results are obligatory and the subject matter is optional for teachers. Teachers have made

    these documents themselves, so it should be useful especially for them and their

    students. Thats why it is only up to teacher in what way grammar will be presented.

    The sequence of presented grammar is free, too. Teacher can use several types ofmethods, even though he can use several textbooks and authentic materials for his work.

    17

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    18/34

    He can choose different methods and materials but he has to reach students expected

    results.

    The list of grammatical units taken from the School Educational Programme

    Expected results Grammatical units

    A pupil is able to:

    - use indefinite article a, an with the nouns

    - recognize the single and plural form of the

    nouns

    -posses things to the person

    NOUNS

    - indefinite article a, an

    - plural of the nouns ( regular and irregular

    forms)

    - genitive of the nouns

    - put the adjectives correctly into the sentence ADJECTIVES

    - a position of adjectives in the sentence

    - give the

    personal pronouns

    to the correct

    person

    - use the

    object pronouns in

    the sentence

    - use the

    possessive

    pronouns instead

    of genitive

    - ask with interrogative pronouns

    PRONOUNS

    - personal

    pronouns subject

    and object form

    - possessive

    pronouns

    - interrogativ

    e pronouns

    - demonstrati

    ve pronouns ( that,

    those, this, these)

    - count the things, animals and people NUMBERS-NUMERALS

    - numbers 0-100

    - understand

    simple speech and

    conversation about

    personal details

    VERBS

    - verb to be:

    statement,

    negative, question,

    18

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    19/34

    - ask for

    personal details

    - describe the

    place, picture,

    photo

    - describe a

    person, animal,

    thing or a place in

    a simple sentence

    - ask for

    personal

    description

    - say what a

    person is / isnt

    able to do

    - ask for

    permission

    short answer

    - phrase

    there is/are

    - verb to havegot : statement,

    negative, question,

    short answer

    - modal verb can,cant

    - put the prepositions correctly into a sentence PREPOSITIONS

    - preposition of a place and the time

    - make

    simple sentence in

    present simple

    - follow the

    form of English

    sentence

    - use the

    auxiliary verbs

    correctly

    - make

    question in present

    simple

    - follow theform of English

    PRESENT SIMPLE TENSE

    - statement, negative statement ( dont,

    doesnt), questions ( do, does), short answers

    19

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    20/34

    question

    - make the

    sentence in present

    cont.

    - make the

    negative sentence

    in present cont.

    - make the question in present cont.

    PRESENT CONTINUOUS TENSE

    - statement, negative statement, question

    -describe what happens frequently - present tenses : using and comparing

    - describe what is happening now

    According to the School Educational Programme teacher should proceed from the

    expected results, these are the most important points in his work. This table shows how

    the teacher makes a process. The results are done and the subject matter is chosen by theteacher.

    7.2 Lesson plans for the main grammatical units

    1) Lesson plan 1 is based on these expected results from the School Educational

    Programme: a pupil is able to describe a place, thing and a person, to understand the short

    text with description, to make sentence in present tense. The verb have gothas been chosen

    as a subject matter. The expected results are used in a lesson plan as an aim of the lesson.Several methods of teaching were used there. The covert grammar teaching was used in

    20

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    21/34

    presenting grammatical unit by using the pictures and speaking about them. Drill was used in

    a game memory chain. But it is covered in this game. The last part of the lesson is based

    on childrens natural skill drawing.

    Lesson plan 1, verb to have got.

    Aim:pupils will be able to use the verb in a sentence, they will be able to understand

    the sentence with the verb in its two forms: have got, has gotand negative forms havent

    gotand hasnt got.

    Age of students: 10 11 year-old children

    Material: a blue ball for teacher, two pictures on the plastic folio (a girl with a doll, a

    boy with a car), one picture for each child with known vocabulary, a piece of paper for

    each pupil, stick gum.

    Time plan:

    1. Introduction - teacher shows a ball and says: I have got ablue ball. Then points to the first picture and says: She has got a

    small doll. Then points to the second picture and says: He hasgot a red car. Then writes these three sentences under the

    pictures.

    7 min.

    2. Teacher asks children for repeating the sentences..3 min.

    3. Each child gets a picture, it is asked to make its ownsentence. I have got an orange.

    10 min.

    4. Game: memory chain, teacher starts the game I have got ablue ball and points to Tom, he says You have got a blue ball

    and I have got an orange Then the third person is speaking She

    21

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    22/34

    has got a .he has got an .and I have got a

    several children will be asked for repeating the whole sentence. It

    should not be very long.

    7 min.

    5. Piccasso dictation, teacher dictates the short text with theverb to have got about the monster and children are asked to draw

    it. 10 min.

    6. Feedback, children put their paintings on the board and theycheck their work together, they repeat the short text about the

    monster. 8 min.

    The text for children: This is a nice monster. It has got a big head and a big body. It has

    got four long arms but it hasnt got any legs. It has got lovely green eyes, long nose and

    a big mouth. It has got long pink hair. Its body is green too. Each arm has got five

    fingers. It is our friend. Its name is Fanny. (appendix n.2)

    2) Lesson plan 2 respects these expected results, taken from the School Educational

    Programme: a pupil is able to make the question in present simple, to follow the form of

    question in present simple, to use an auxiliary verb do. Again the aim of the lesson is

    based on these results. The lead-in activity has been chosen as a revision from the last

    lesson. The second reason is to introduce several verbs that will be used later in questions.

    Coloured pieces of paper with auxiliary verb, personal pronouns and with full verbs

    should help children to remember the structure of the question in present simple. The rule

    of making question will be given explicitly to students. The important point is mentioned

    in pair work, the same colours of the words. During the individual practice children canuse the coloured pencils too. An important intention is specified in this lesson plan. The

    students will be working only with the auxiliary verb do and personal pronouns that

    belong to.

    Lesson plan 2, question in present simple

    Aim:pupils will be able to make question in present simple, to use the verb do for

    specific personal pronouns, to follow the form of the question in present simple

    22

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    23/34

    Age: 10-11 year-old pupils

    Material: coloured card with an auxiliary verb DO (green), personal pronouns I, you,

    we, they (yellow), full verbs (pink), collections of words for making the questions,

    textbook Project I, school exercise books, worksheets for pupils.

    Time plan:

    1. lead in activity, brainstorming: revision from the last lesson, teacher puts pinkcards with verbs on the board and children read them, then children are asked for making

    the statement about themselves in present simple with these verbs. Pupil says the

    sentence, puts the card on the board and writes the rest of a sentence .

    7 min.

    2. presenting a new grammatical item: teacher explains the form of the question inpresent simple with using coloured cards. Several examples are put on the board.

    5 min.

    3. then students are asked to make questions and write them on the board, they use allverbs from the lead activity 5 min.

    4. pair work: each pair of pupils gets a collection of the words in the same coloures aswere used for presenting, they are asked for making the questions in present simple

    3 min.

    5. checking the task, each pair reads its question loudly, the rest of a class corrects,all questions are put on one desk for checking together 5 min.

    6. individual practice: children are asked for writing an exercise from their textbooksto their school exercise books. The task: complete the question according to a picture.

    Children can use coloured pencils. After writing the exercise they give it to the teacher

    for checking, teacher checks it and gives advice for correcting.

    23

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    24/34

    5 min.

    7. feedback: children get worksheets with two exercises and try to do it themselves

    7 min.

    8. children change their worksheets and check them together, they correct themistakes and count the points, then put mark to a friend

    Materials for this lesson plan are presented as an appendix n. 4a

    8. Teaching process

    8.1 Hypotheses for each lesson

    Lesson 1 (according to lesson plan 1)

    The main result of this lesson is characterized as a pupils ability of describing

    something, ability for using the verb have got, ability of understanding a short

    description. So it is expected that children will be able to use the verb at the end of a

    lesson. The lesson seems to be enjoyable for children, because of a choice of activities.

    Pupils are expected to behave well and to be interested in the activities. I assume that a

    lead in activity will start a good atmosphere in a class. A new grammatical unit will be

    presented as a cover grammar teaching, which seems to be better way for this unit and for

    young learners too. Drill, covered in a game, is expected to be done with pleasure.

    Teacher should anticipate some problems during this game. Especially weak learners are

    expected to have problem with repeating the whole sentence. I will pay attention of these

    pupils and I will encourage them and help them. It seems to be helpful if children stand up

    and show their picture to everybody. Other children could remember the sentence easily

    with visual support. Piccasso dictation is expected to be funny and enjoyable for children,

    because they like drawing, monsters and mystery. This activity seems to be useful way

    how to fix the using of the verb have got. But for fulfilling the results it is necessary to be

    very careful during this activity. Children have to work themselves, so it would be better

    if children sit alone. Then the teacher can check their work fairly. Possible problems with

    using vocabulary should appear during the dictation, but it is good to help children with

    vocabulary. They will be able to concentrate on understanding the forms of verb have got.

    24

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    25/34

    Lesson 2(according to lesson plan 2)

    This grammatical unit is often difficult for children. Thats why I assume that not all the

    children will be able to make the question in present simple surely. Some children are

    expected to need more time for practicing. I appreciate that the lead in activity is going to

    help children to connect the verbs of daily activities with using the present simple. Using

    the coloured cards, coloured collection of words and the worksheets with coloured words

    is assumed to be helpful for children. The main intention is to fix these colours in

    childrens brains. Firstly, the big cards with the words will be stuck on the board (first

    support), then children will make the questions with coloured small papers (second

    support), then the worksheets are prepared to use colours again (third support). I

    anticipate that most of the children will be able to do exercises in the worksheets

    correctly.

    8.2 Experience and evaluation

    Lesson 1

    The first part of a lesson has been taken naturally by children without any problems.

    They listened carefully and repeated the sentences well. Sometimes children did not

    pronounce well, so I corrected them and ask for repetition. After getting pictures in the

    next part of the lesson, some children were confused with using a right word. It would be

    better next time to name all the pictures together before making sentences. An important

    point discovered during this part. Children corrected the mistakes each other without any

    bad intention. Children did not need a long explanation for the game. They had known it

    from previous lessons. But as it had been assumed, weak learners had a problem with

    repeating the whole sentences. I tried to choose these children at the beginning of this

    activity so that they had not such a long sentence. Next important point of this game was

    that children have to concentrate on the word order of the things in a chain not on the

    using of verb have got. They used a new grammatical item covered in the game without

    specific concentration. The most enjoyable part was surely Piccasso dictation. Children

    did not take it as a dictation, but as a game again. Some of them tried to look around but I

    explained to them what it is about. Weak learners had a problem with vocabulary that

    they had not learnt before. Next time it could be better to do this activity in pairs,

    especially in this class because of several dyslectic children. They would be more

    25

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    26/34

    concentrated on the grammar then on an unknown vocabulary. At the end of the last

    activity children wanted to put their paintings on the wall. They liked their monsters very

    much. I know that this type of activities is very interesting for children.

    Lesson 2

    Lead in activity has been presented according to teachers expectation. Children were

    able to use ten verbs in several statements. Sometimes they needed help with using the right

    prepositions. Then it was very useful that these verbs stayed on the board. They were used

    immediately for explaining the form of questions in present simple and the function of DO.

    I paid attention to colours. It was very helpful for children. They could change the cards onthe board easily. Most children understood quickly. Then in pair work there were no

    problem with completing the sentences. Children worked quickly and carefully. But during

    individual work some problems came. Children made mistakes in using right personal

    pronouns and in spelling. Those children who had problems were asked for using colours

    again. Quite a big surprise came during the work on worksheets. There were twenty three

    children in a class and except two boys who are both dyslexic children and need more time

    for this task all children have done the tasks well. These two boys were asked to finish it at

    home and bring it next time. I saw this lesson as a big success because there always had

    been problems with questions in present simple in each class. Next positive point is that

    children are prepared for using auxiliary verb does which is coming next time.

    9. Checking and testing the knowledge

    9.1 Test for students

    Test 1, verb to have got, (appendix n.3a,3b, 5a,5b)

    The first test is put together so that it checks students skills and abilities that are

    characterized in these expected results: a pupil is able to describe a person, an animal, a

    thing and place, to understand a simple description, to use the verb have got in simple

    sentences in all its forms, to work with a short text with this verb. The test has been made

    with known vocabulary, according to the topics that have been discussed during lessons.Several topics were taught within the verb have got, thats why the exercises in the test

    26

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    27/34

    use different topics (school subjects, days of a week, animals, colours and things, personal

    details, parts of the body). The first exercise is based on using the verb to have gotfor the

    first and second person singular and plural only. Through the knowledge of the school

    subjects and the days of the week students should complete the sentences.

    The second exercise asks student for answering four questions about themselves. They

    should write true sentences from their real life.

    The task of the third exercise is to fill in the conversation between two young girls. The

    main result is to understand this conversation clearly so that the phrase should be used in

    daily situation.

    Exercise number 4 finds out how children can make sentence with the verb to havegot.

    All the words are written in capital letters in order not to be recognizable which word

    goes first.

    Exercise number 5 is based on translation either form Czech to English or from English

    to Czech. An easy vocabulary has been chosen, because the translation is often very

    difficult for children. The main intention is to use the verb have gotin a sentence, not to

    check the vocabulary.

    The last exercise is something like compensation for children. It has been made for

    pleasure so that the students will not be stressed so much during the test. At the end of the

    test children could paint the pictures of William and Wendy. (Taken from Project

    Grammar, mluvnick cvien, Carolyn Barraclough, by OUP,2004)

    Children can reach maximum 44 points.

    Test 2, present simple, (appendix n. 4b,6a,6b)

    Test number 2 was made according to the result of students being able to make simple

    sentence in present simple tense, to follow the structure of question, to use auxiliary verbs

    do and does correctly. Test is set up with using known vocabulary. The main attention is

    put on working with the sentence in present simple. There are eight exercises in which

    pupils should present their knowledge of present simple tense. In those exercises several

    methods are used during the one topic, daily activities.

    27

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    28/34

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    29/34

    the whole sentence. Possible problems might be with the position of adjectives in

    sentences three and four. Translation is expected to be the most difficult. The most

    frequent mistakes are often being done in using definite and indefinite articles and in the

    structure of the sentence and question. Next problem would appear with using personal

    pronouns in translation from Czech to English. Last exercise, which should be enjoyablefor children, could make problems with some new words, but with visual support children

    could understand them correctly.

    Test2, present simple

    An easy vocabulary concerning one topic is used in all exercises from the test. Thats

    why it is not expected that students have problems with vocabulary. First exercise should

    bring problems with using correct form of the full verbs. Children often make mistakes in

    subject verb concord. They do not recognize clearly to which pronoun subject needs to be

    connected (her parents=they). I expect mistakes with using do, does inexercise n. 2.

    Children often forget to put auxiliary verb into the question. The third and fourth

    exercises are expected to be well done because of using colours as in lessons. Possible

    problems with subject verb concord are assumed again in exercise n. 5. Next mistakes

    should appear in using the right form of full verb, right prepositions and the time in the

    sixth exercise. Children are going to make sentence without any help, thats why therecould be some errors. The table in the next task should be made without any problems.

    The last task anticipates finding grammatical errors. Students could be disappointed with

    these mistakes. Not all the mistakes will be found. The teacher should respect these

    problems and will put attention on clear explanation. The teacher will notice the

    importance of present simple and possible mistakes. Children should not look for other

    mistakes.

    9.3 Evaluation of the tests

    The evaluation of the tests is presented in these four tables. The students could reach total

    score of 44 points for the first test and 57 points for the second one. Tables 1 and 3 show

    the evaluated data. Tables 2 and 4 present evaluation according to the school expected

    results. These tables show how teacher can evaluate the tests. This simple way is quick,

    well-arranged. It provides clear image about fulfilling of the expected results.

    Table n. 1(verb have got)

    29

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    30/34

    Evaluative score (in points) Mark A number of students

    44 40 1 2

    39,5 32 2 11

    31,5 20 3 3

    19,5 10 4 3

    9,5 0 5 3

    2,70 22

    According to this result the verb have gotshould have been practicing more during the

    lessons and then next short test should be offered to the children. The expected school result

    of knowing the verb have gothas been partially fulfilled. But more frequent mistakes have

    been done in other grammatical units (personal pronouns, indefinite articles).

    Table n. 2(verb have got)

    Exercise n:

    Success (%)

    More frequent errors Probable reasons Notes for next work

    1.

    85%

    -in the sentence before

    the last one, using the

    long form of the verb

    have gotinstead of

    short form

    - it is the only one

    sentence where should

    be used a long form

    -practice more the

    short forms

    2.

    60%

    - using the correct

    subject in two last

    sentences

    -two sentences use 2nd

    p.sing.

    - mixed up the subjects

    in the sentences

    3.

    35%

    - finding the correct

    form of the verb have

    got

    - using a short and a

    long forms of the verb

    - missing knowledge

    of the right

    forms(subject verb

    concord)

    - more practice of this

    type of conversation

    4.

    45%

    - putting the indefinite

    articles to the right

    position in the

    sentence

    - paying attention to a

    verb have got

    - revise indefinite

    articles, their using and

    position

    5. - using the articles in a - less practice in the - practice the

    30

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    31/34

    65% translation from

    English

    - translation the

    subjects ( pronouns) to

    Czech

    lessons

    - missing knowledge

    of personal pronouns

    translation more often

    - revise personal

    pronouns

    6.

    85%

    - using the short forms

    of negative without

    got

    - less practice during

    the lessons, little space

    for childrens writing

    -practice the negative

    forms once more

    Table n. 3 (present simple)

    Evaluative score (in points) Mark Number of students

    57-51 1 6

    50,5-41 2 8

    40,5-25 3 5

    24,5-12 4 3

    11,5-0 5 0

    2,20 22

    Table n. 4 (present simple)

    Exercise n:

    Success (%)

    More frequent

    mistakes

    Probable reason Notes for the next

    work

    1.

    65%

    - adding s in 3

    rd

    p.sing.

    - without coloures

    - difficult to recognize

    the subject( Janet and

    Jason)

    -practice with namesand different subject,

    not only with personal

    pronouns

    2.

    75%

    - sometimes with using

    correct auxiliary verb

    - no visual support, the

    sentences start with

    interrogative pronouns

    - practice with

    interrogative pronouns

    3. and 4. - are connected, if the

    child made mistake in

    - missing knowledge of

    using auxiliary verb

    - use the coloures in 3

    too

    31

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    32/34

    60% 3, it had to be made in 4

    - missing any sentence

    element in the sentence,

    incorrect auxiliary verb.

    - often in the fourth

    exercise children found

    out the mistake and

    correct it in ex.n.3

    - visual support in 4

    helps them

    5.

    75%

    - only in sentence with

    your father and children

    as subjects

    - your is similar to you,

    the word children make

    problems with

    recognizing the singular

    or plural

    - revise before the test

    singular and plural

    forms of the nouns

    6.

    85%

    - only a few mistakes in

    3rd and 4th sentences( 3rd

    p. sing.)

    - many sentences have

    been done during the

    lessons, children are

    used of them

    - still pay more

    attention to 3rd p. sing.

    7.

    95%

    - without grammatical

    mistakes, only in

    spelling great!

    - visual support,

    children are used of it,

    it helps a lot

    - continue with this

    method

    8.

    40%

    - not recognizing the

    mistakes in subject verb

    concord

    - no visual support, too

    long for children, quite

    difficult

    - use the coloures in this

    exercise,try it again,

    choose shorter text

    This table presents the fact that children are able to use the present simple in different

    types of exercise. They sometimes made mistakes, but the school result of knowing the

    present simple was almost fulfilled. It needs to be practised further in the lessons. It has

    appeared that the method of visual support is very helpful for children. Thats why it

    should continue.

    10. Conclusion

    32

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    33/34

    Advantages and disadvantages of using the School Educational

    Programme

    Several advantages have been found during this thesis. The Framework Educational

    Programme provides free and equal opportunity for each school in our republic to present itsaims, skills, intentions, position of school in a hierarchy of our state education. The fact that

    each School Educational Programme will be little bit different seems to be very good for

    future education. The parents could choose the suitable school for their children. The schools

    could present themselves. They can offer several possibilities of teaching process. A fair

    competition between schools will start. The School Educational Programme offers several

    methods of teaching, the schools can choose various materials for their education, different

    titles of textbooks, different authentic materials. The teaching process seems to be more free

    and enjoyable for children. Relationships between subjects appear as a big advantage, too.

    On the other hand there are several disadvantages, too. This process of making and

    realizing the School Educational Programme takes a lot of teachers time, not only during the

    working time, but more often in their free time. It is very difficult to do this work during the

    school year, during the teaching process. The teachers need to work together but it is often

    impossible during the teaching process. Next disadvantage is that we can see the function of

    the Framework Educational Programme in a few next years. It should be evaluated as awhole after one generation of students finish the basic school. Next problem surely come if

    the family moves and a child has to change the school, because each school can change the

    sequence of subject matters.

    All these advantages and disadvantages here are just my observations during studying the

    Framework Educational Programme and during making of the School Educational

    Programme. Of course, when this new educational document will be fully transferred into

    the practical use it will surely bring other possible advantages and disadvantages.

    33

  • 7/31/2019 Lessonplan Bi Tutor

    34/34