6
LESSON 5 – JUDGEMENT AND PROPOSITION (For Classroom purposes only) JUDGMENT A. MEANING Although we have learned that ideas or concepts are the basic elements of knowledge, we should remember that ideas by themselves are neither true or false. There can be truthfulness or falsity in a statement only if we take 2 or more terms, compare them and eventually state an agreement or disagreement between them. Only then can we validate their truth or falsity. In our previous discussions, we have tackled that concepts signified by terms is achieved through a process called simple apprehension. However, concepts alone is not sufficient for us to claim that we have knowledge. Knowledge is attained only when we validly affirm or deny something about a thing through the enunciation of complete sentences. Only when we identify and recognize the truth in a statement could we say that we have knowledge of a thing. This act of recognizing the truth in statements fall within the mental act that we call JUDGEMENT. JUDGMENT is defined as “THE SECOND ACT OF THE INTELLECT BY WHICH IT PRONOUNCES THE AGREEMENT OR DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN TERMS OR IDEAS.” It is the act by which the intellect compares and expresses the objective identity or non-identity between ideas. For example: when we say that “the apple is red”, the intellect either affirms or denies the truth claim of the statement about the individual object “apple” that is “red”. B. NATURE OF JUDGMENT Before judgment can be performed, certain acts should be observed: 1. Apprehension of the two concepts ( one must at least explicitly show a conceptual feature not present to the other) 2. Mental comparison of the two concepts by which the mind comprehends them together 3. Perception of the objective identity or non-identity of the two concepts. 4. Pronouncements of the identity or non identity of one concept with another. When the pronouncement is in agreement with reality, it is called formal truth. When the pronouncement disagrees with reality, it is called formal falsehood. Either way, the end product of judgment is called ENUNCIATION. NOTE: Logic primarily deals with the validity of an argument and not really on the truth of an argument. Strictly speaking, the

LESSON 5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Lessons in college logic

Citation preview

Page 1: LESSON 5

LESSON 5 – JUDGEMENT AND PROPOSITION(For Classroom purposes only)

JUDGMENTA. MEANING

Although we have learned that ideas or concepts are the basic elements of knowledge, we should remember that ideas by themselves are neither true or false. There can be truthfulness or falsity in a statement only if we take 2 or more terms, compare them and eventually state an agreement or disagreement between them. Only then can we validate their truth or falsity.

In our previous discussions, we have tackled that concepts signified by terms is achieved through a process called simple apprehension. However, concepts alone is not sufficient for us to claim that we have knowledge. Knowledge is attained only when we validly affirm or deny something about a thing through the enunciation of complete sentences. Only when we identify and recognize the truth in a statement could we say that we have knowledge of a thing. This act of recognizing the truth in statements fall within the mental act that we call JUDGEMENT.

JUDGMENT is defined as “THE SECOND ACT OF THE INTELLECT BY WHICH IT PRONOUNCES THE AGREEMENT OR DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN TERMS OR IDEAS.” It is the act by which the intellect compares and expresses the objective identity or non-identity between ideas.

For example: when we say that “the apple is red”, the intellect either affirms or denies the truth claim of the statement about the individual object “apple” that is “red”.

B. NATURE OF JUDGMENT

Before judgment can be performed, certain acts should be observed:

1. Apprehension of the two concepts ( one must at least explicitly show a conceptual feature not present to the other)

2. Mental comparison of the two concepts by which the mind comprehends them together3. Perception of the objective identity or non-identity of the two concepts.4. Pronouncements of the identity or non identity of one concept with another.

When the pronouncement is in agreement with reality, it is called formal truth. When the pronouncement disagrees with reality, it is called formal falsehood. Either way, the end product of judgment is called ENUNCIATION.

NOTE: Logic primarily deals with the validity of an argument and not really on the truth of an argument. Strictly speaking, the truthfulness and falsity of judgment falls within the realm of Epistemology and not logic.

PROPOSITIONA. MEANING

A Proposition is defined as “judgment expressed in a sentence.” It is the sign or representation of a mental pronouncement (enunciation). As a representation of judgment, every proposition must enunciate either a truth or falsity. A proposition becomes categorical when it directly declares a characteristic of a thing unconditionally.

B. NATURE OF A PROPOSITION

Ideas are mental concepts expressed in words which we call terms

Judgments are mental comparison expressed in sentences which we call propositions

All propositions are sentences but not all sentences are propositions

Page 2: LESSON 5

1. A sentence is a proposition when it is in the indicative mood (declarative) and must always be express in the present tense according to the real order.

2. A sentence is not a proposition when it is expressed in interrogative, imperative and exclamatory sentences.

C. PARTS OF A PROPOSITION

A proposition is always comprised of three elements: the subject, the predicate, and the copula.

1. The Subject term is a term designating the idea about which the pronouncement is made. It is the object to which something is affirmed or denied. It refers to the WHO and the WHAT of the statement.

NOTE: 1.) caution should be practice in cases of inversion of subject and predicate. 2.) Impersonal subjects should be re-arranged to show the real subject.

3.) In a proposition, the presence of subject and predicate must always be observed despite their arrangement.

2. The Predicate term is the term designating the idea that is affirmed or denied about subject.

NOTE: when it happens that the grammatical predicate conceals the logical predicate, the grammatical predicate must be analyze to reveal the logical predicate. If however, the verb use as predicate in pronounced in the negative then the quality of the resulting logical proposition could either be positive or negative.

3. The Copula is the term expressing the mental act, which pronounces the agreement or disagreement between the subject and predicate. The copula is usually expressed as a linking verb i.e. is, are, am, is not, are not, am not. The copula is considered as the soul of the proposition because it is responsible in expressing the affirmation of negation contained in the proposition.

NOTE: 1.) The copula should always be used in the present indicative mood of the verb “to be”. If propositions are stated in a manner referring to past or future event, the proposition should be reduced to its present tense. Like in hidden predicates, copulas when hidden in a proposition should be re-stated to reveal them nut caution should be maintained not change the meaning of the proposition. 2.) Sometimes a single proposition could have two copulas, one in the main proposition and another in a qualifying clause. E.g. A man [who is strong] is healthy.

4. QUANTIFIERS – are not considered as a part of a proposition but are important because they determine the quantity of the subject class. Unlike in grammar whereas the subject would include the quantifier, the subject- term in logic is considered as distinct from the quantifier.

To illustrate:

All men are rational.

Quantifier subject term Copula predicate term

D. KINDS OF CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

1.) QUALITY OF A PROPOSITION a.) it is an affirmative proposition if the class designated by its subject term is included, either as

a whole or only in part, within the class designated by its predicate term.

Rules to observe:i. The predicate is always affirmed of the subject according to the whole of its comprehension and according to a part of its extension.ii. The predicate should not be disturbed and use as particular, never as a universal.

Page 3: LESSON 5

b.) it is a negative proposition if it wholly or partially excludes members of the subject class from the predicate class

Rules to observe:i. The predicate is always denied of its subject according to only a part of its extension.ii. The whole of the comprehension of the predicate never applies to the subject, but a part of the comprehension does.iii. The predicate is always taken according to its whole extension as a universal and then denied of the subject. Both subject and predicate belong to totally different classes and neither one belongs to the class of the other

NOTE: The quality of a proposition affects the copula, making the proposition either affirmative or negative. If a proposition has a positive copula, then the proposition is affirmative. If a proposition has a negative copula, then it is negative.

2.) QUANTITY OF A PROPOSITIONa.) Singular proposition – when the subject applies to a single individual only.

b.) Particular proposition – when the subject is a universal term used partly and indeterminately. The subject is quantified by indefinite modifiers and articles.

c.) Universal proposition – when the subject is a universal term applied distributively to each and all of the class.

d.) Collective proposition – when the subject is a collective term, applying to all taken together as a class, but not to the individuals composing the class.

e.) indefinite proposition – when the proposition has no definite quantifier assigned to the subject. The quantity of the proposition falls on the general sense of the statement and the manner to which it was used.

NOTE:i.) Singular and collective propositions are treated as universal propositions.ii.) The quantity of the proposition should not be confused with the quantity of the predicate term unless the predicate term is singular, then, regardless of the quality of the proposition, its quantity becomes singular.iii.) if the predicate term is not singular and the proposition is affirmative, then the predicate term must be particular.iv.)if the predicate term is not singular and the proposition is negative, then the predicate term must be universal.

E. FOUR STANDARD FORMS OF CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

The letters A, E, I, and O are the traditional symbols for the four standard forms of categorical propositions. To illustrate:

Quantity QualityA All S Are P Universal AffirmativeE No S Are P Universal NegativeI Some S Are P Particular AffirmativeO Some S Are not P Particular Negative

A propositions – it is a universal affirmative proposition, which asserts that every member of a class designated by the subject term is also included in the class designated by the predicate term. Its standard form is : All S are P.E propositions – it is a universal negative proposition, which asserts that nothing is a member both of the class designated by the subject term and of the class designated by the predicate term. Its standard form is: No S are P.

Page 4: LESSON 5

I propositions – it is a proposition, which asserts that there is at least one thing, which is a member of the class, designated by the subject term but not a member of the class designated by the predicate term. Its standard form is: Some S are P.O propositions – it is a proposition, which asserts that there is at least one thing, which is a member of the class, designated by the subject term but not a member of the class designated by the predicate term. Its standard form is: Some S are not P.

F. DISTRIBUTION OF TEMRS IN A CATEGORICAL PROPOSITION

The technical term “distribution” is used to characterize the ways in which terms can occur in categorical propositions. A distributed term is a term of the categorical proposition that is used with reference to every member of a class. If the term is not being use to refer to each and every member of the class, then the term is considered as undistributed.

Letter Form Proposition DistributionSubject Predicate

A All S are P Distributed Undistributed

E No S are P Distributed Distributed

I Some S are P Undistributed Undistributed

O Some S are not P Undistributed Distributed

NOTE: The quantity of a standard form categorical proposition determined the distribution of the subject (such that if the quantity is universal), the subject is distributed and if the quantity is particular, the subject is undistributed. To help y memorize the rule of distribution:

“Universal distributes Subjects”

“Negatives distributes Predicates”-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Use the space below for additional Notes: