LEED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION & MAJOR RENOVATIONS (V2009)csc-production.s3.amazonaws.com/2015/09/09/18/16/12/836/LEED final... · Project ID 1000005697 Rating system & version LEED-NC

Project ID 1000005697

Rating system & version LEED-NC v2009

Project registration date 04/08/2010

LEED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION & MAJOR RENOVATIONS (V2009)ATTEMPTED: 80, DENIED: 1, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 84 OF 110 POINTS

SUSTAINABLE SITES 21 OF 26SSp1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention YSSc1 Site Selection 1 / 1SSc2 Development Density and Community Connectivity 5 / 5SSc3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 / 1SSc4.1Alternative Transportation-Public Transportation Access 6 / 6SSc4.2Alternative Transportation-Bicycle Storage and Changing Room 0 / 1SSc4.3Alternative Transportation-Low-Emitting and Fuel-Effic ient V 3 / 3SSc4.4Alternative Transportation-Parking Capacity 2 / 2SSc5.1Site Development-Protect or Restore Habitat 1 / 1SSc5.2Site Development-Maximize Open Space 1 / 1SSc6.1Stormwater Design-Quantity Control 0 / 1SSc6.2Stormwater Design-Quality Control 0 / 1SSc7.1Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof 0 / 1SSc7.2Heat Island Effect, Roof 1 / 1SSc8 Light Pollution Reduction 0 / 1

WATER EFFICIENCY 8 OF 10WEp1 Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction YWEc1 Water Effic ient Landscaping 4 / 4WEc2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 0 / 2WEc3 Water Use Reduction 4 / 4

ENERGY AND ATMOSPHERE 27 OF 35EAp1 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems YEAp2 Minimum Energy Performance YEAp3 Fundamental Refrigerant Mgmt YEAc1 Optimize Energy Performance 17 / 19EAc2 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 / 7EAc3 Enhanced Commissioning 2 / 2EAc4 Enhanced Refrigerant Mgmt 2 / 2EAc5 Measurement and Verification 3 / 3EAc6 Green Power 2 / 2

MATERIALS AND RESOURCES 8 OF 14MRp1 Storage and Collection of Recyclables YMRc1.1Building Reuse-Maintain Existing Walls, Floors and Roof 3 / 3MRc1.2Building Reuse, Maintain 50% of Interior 0 / 1MRc2 Construction Waste Mgmt 2 / 2MRc3 Materials Reuse 0 / 2MRc4 Recycled Content 2 / 2

MATERIALS AND RESOURCES CONTINUEDMRc5 Regional Materials 1 / 2MRc6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 0 / 1MRc7 Certified Wood 0 / 1

INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 10 OF 15IEQp1 Minimum IAQ Performance YIEQp2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control YIEQc1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 0 / 1IEQc2 Increased Ventilation 0 / 1IEQc3.1Construction IAQ Mgmt Plan-During Construction 1 / 1IEQc3.2Construction IAQ Mgmt Plan-Before Occupancy 1 / 1IEQc4.1Low-Emitting Materials-Adhesives and Sealants 1 / 1IEQc4.2Low-Emitting Materials-Paints and Coatings 1 / 1IEQc4.3Low-Emitting Materials-Flooring Systems 1 / 1IEQc4.4Low-Emitting Materials-Composite Wood and Agrifiber Products 1 / 1IEQc5 Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control 0 / 1IEQc6.1Controllabil i ty of Systems-Lighting 1 / 1IEQc6.2Controllabil i ty of Systems-Thermal Comfort 0 / 1IEQc7.1Thermal Comfort-Design 1 / 1IEQc7.2Thermal Comfort-Verification 1 / 1IEQc8.1Daylight and Views-Daylight 0 / 1IEQc8.2Daylight and Views-Views 1 / 1

INNOVATION IN DESIGN 6 OF 6IDc1.1 Green Building Educational Program 1 / 1IDc1.1 Innovation in Design 0 / 1IDc1.2 Exemplary Performance SS 4.1 1 / 1IDc1.2 Innovation in Design 0 / 1IDc1.3 Green Cleaning 1 / 1IDc1.3 Innovation in Design 0 / 1IDc1.4 Innovation in Design 0 / 1IDc1.4 Exemplary Recycled Content 1 / 1IDc1.5 Integrated Pest Mgmt 1 / 1IDc1.5 Innovation in Design 0 / 1IDc2 LEED® Accredited Professional 1 / 1

REGIONAL PRIORITY CREDITS 4 OF 4SSc3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 / 1SSc6.1 Stormwater Design-Quantity Control 0 / 1SSc7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof 0 / 1SSc7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 1 / 1EAc2 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 / 1MRc1.1Building Reuse-Maintain Existing Walls, Floors and Roof 1 / 1

TOTAL 84 OF 110

LEED Certification Review ReportThis report contains the results of the technical review of an application for LEED® certification submitted for the specified project. LEEDcertification is an official recognition that a project complies with the requirements prescribed within the LEED rating systems as createdand maintained by the U.S. Green Building Council® (USGBC®). The LEED certifcation program is administered by the Green BuildingCertification Institute (GBCI®).

Cornell Warren Hall

Certified (Platinum) CERTIFIED: 40-49, SILVER: 50-59, GOLD: 60-79,

PLATINUM: 80+

leed-nc

CREDIT DETAILS

Project Information Forms

PIf1: Minimum Program Requirements Approved

11/16/2014 DESIGN PRELIMINARY REVIEW

The LEED Form states that the project complies with all Minimum Program Requirements. The project will comply with MPR 6: MustCommit to Sharing Whole-Building Energy and Water Usage Data via Option 1: Third Party Data Source. The project is located in Ithaca,NY.

PIf2: Project Summary Details Approved

07/10/2015

02/10/2015

11/13/2014

CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY REVIEW

This form was previously awarded in the Design Final review. Changes have been made to the total number of parking spaces providedto the building occupants and a narrative states that the five parking spaces were existing prior to the LEED project.

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW

The additional documentation clarifies the total area reported and demonstrates compliance.

DESIGN PRELIMINARY REVIEW

The LEED Form includes the required project summary details. There is one building in this LEED application with a total of sevenstories and 135,889 gross square feet. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The total area reported here (135,889 square feet) is inconsistent with that within IEQp1: Minimum Air Quality Performance (83,686square feet). Square footage values must be reported consistently. Provide a narrative and revise the form to ensure that the total grosssquare footage is consistent across all submittals.

PIf3: Occupant and Usage Data Approved


The LEED Form includes the required occupant and usage data. The project consists primarily of Core Learning Space:College/University spaces. The average users value is 1,258, the peak users value is 1,558, and the FTE value is 458.

PIf4: Schedule and Overview Documents Approved


The LEED Form includes the design and construction schedule. The date of substantial completion is July 1, 2014 and the date ofoccupancy is October 31, 2014. The required documents have been uploaded.

Sustainable Sites

SSp1: Construction Activity PollutionPrevention

Awarded

08/11/2015

07/10/2015

CONSTRUCTION FINAL REVIEW

The additional documentation demonstrates compliance.


The LEED Form states that the project has implemented an erosion and sedimentation control (ESC) plan that conforms to localstandards and code, which are more stringent than the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programrequirements. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Provide the narrative describing how the local erosion and sedimentation control standards are equal or more stringent than therequirements of Phase I and Phase II of the NPDES program.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1ATTEMPTED: 1, DENIED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1

SSc1: Site Selection Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project site does not meet any of the prohibited criteria.


SSc2: Development Density and CommunityConnectivity

Awarded: 5

02/09/2015

11/04/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW



The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 2: Community Connectivity. However, to demonstrate compliance, thefollowing must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. It is unclear whether all basic services are available to the general public (Fitness Centers, Libraries, Community/Events Centers,etc). Provide documentation demonstrating that the noted services are accessible to the public or provide a revised form and maphighlighting ten unique, qualifying basic services (restaurants may be counted twice) within a one-half mile radius of a main buildingentrance that are accessible to the public. It is the intent of this pathway that basic services are available to everyone and are notrestricted to campus occupants and staff.


SSc3: Brownfield Redevelopment Awarded: 1

02/09/2015 DESIGN FINAL REVIEW

This credit was submitted for initial review during the Design Final Review. The LEED Form states that the project has documentedasbestos contamination in the building.


SSc4.1: Alternative Transportation-PublicTransportation Access

Awarded: 6


This credit was previously awarded in the Design Preliminary Review. The exemplary performance path has been selected. Thedocumentation continues to demonstrate compliance.


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 2: Bus Station Proximity and is located within one-quarter mile walkingdistance of one or more stops for two or more public, campus, or private bus lines usable by building occupants.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1

SSc4.2: Alternative Transportation-BicycleStorage and Changing Rooms

Not Attempted


SSc4.3: Alternative Transportation-Low-Emitting and Fuel-Efficient Vehicles

Awarded: 3

07/10/2015 CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY REVIEW

The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 1 and provides preferred parking spaces for low-emitting and fuel-efficientvehicles for 20% of the total parking capacity.


SSc4.4: Alternative Transportation-ParkingCapacity

Awarded: 2


The LEED Form states that no new parking has been created within the LEED project scope of work.


SSc5.1: Site Development-Protect or RestoreHabitat

Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Case 2: Previously Developed Areas or Graded Sites. The project has restored orprotected at least 50% of the project site excluding the building footprint using native or adapted vegetation.


SSc5.2: Site Development-Maximize OpenSpace

Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Case 2: Sites with No Local Zoning Requirements. The open space provided isequal to or greater than the footprint of the LEED project building.

It is noted that the area provided on the form is inconsistent with the values identified on the site plan. For future projects, ensure thedocumentation is consistent across all submittals. Credit compliance is not affected in this case.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1SSc6.1: Stormwater Design-Quantity Control Not Attempted

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1SSc6.2: Stormwater Design-Quality Control Not Attempted

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1SSc7.1: Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof Not Attempted


SSc7.2: Heat Island Effect-Roof Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 3 and the weighted average roof area for the combined SRI compliant andvegetated roofing surfaces is greater than or equal to the total building roof area.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1SSc8: Light Pollution Reduction Not Attempted

Water Efficiency

WEp1: Water Use Reduction-20% Reduction Awarded


The LEED Form states that the project has reduced potable water use by 40%.


WEc1: Water Efficient Landscaping Awarded: 4


The LEED Form states that the landscaping does not use permanent irrigation systems and that all temporary irrigation systems usedfor plant establishment will be removed within 18 months of installation.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 2WEc2: Innovative Wastewater Technologies Not Attempted


WEc3: Water Use Reduction Awarded: 4


The LEED Form states that the project has reduced potable water use by 40%.

Energy and Atmosphere

EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning of theBuilding Energy Systems

Awarded

08/18/2015

07/14/2015




The LEED Form states that the commissioning report is pending completion and a contract is in place to ensure that the report will becompleted. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. PIf4: Schedule and Overview Documents indicates that October 31, 2014, was the date of Substantial Completion of Construction;however, the form for this prerequisite indicates that the commissioning report is pending completion. This is highly unlikely. Pleaseindicate if the commissioning report has been completed and provide an executive summary of the commissioning report whichincludes a list of systems commissioned, a summary of issues corrected, and a list of major outstanding/unresolved issues.

EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance Awarded

02/09/2015

11/17/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW

The LEED Form has been revised to address the issues outlined in the Preliminary Review and states that the project has achieved anenergy cost savings of 40.12%. The total predicted annual energy consumption for the project is 656,096 kWh/year of electricity and53,278 therms/year of natural gas.

A new Section 1.4 input file has been developed and is available to project teams (http://www.usgbc.org/resources/eap2-section-14-tables-new-all-bdampc-projects-regardless-registration-date). This new input file will be required to be used for all projects registeredafter September 30, 2013. Project teams are encouraged to begin using this file before the required date.


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation and has achieved an energy costsavings of 41.63%. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following comments requiring a project response must be addressed forthe Final Review.

A new Section 1.4 input file has been developed and is available to project teams (http://www.usgbc.org/resources/eap2-section-14-tables-new-all-bdampc-projects-regardless-registration-date). This new input file will be required to be used for all projects registeredafter September 30, 2013. Project teams are encouraged to begin using this file before the required date.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

REVIEW COMMENTS REQUIRING A PROJECT RESPONSE (Mandatory)

1. Provide the following:

a. A narrative response to each Preliminary Review comment below.

b. A narrative describing any additional changes made to the energy models between the Preliminary and Final Review phases notaddressed by the responses to the review comments. The mandatory comments are perceived to reduce the projected savings for theProposed design. If the projected savings increase substantially in the Final submission, without implementing any optional commentsthat may improve performance, a narrative explanation for these results must be provided.

2. An energy savings is reflected for exterior lighting; however, the tradable surfaces contributing to the Baseline Case exterior lightingpower have not been listed in Table 1.4.5. Provide a narrative confirming that the Proposed Case exterior lighting reflects the actualbuilding design and the Baseline case reflects the allowed lighting power from the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 Section 9. Ensure that no creditis taken in the Proposed Design Case for lighting reductions on non-tradable surfaces. Additionally, additional lighting power allowancecannot be claimed in the Baseline model for surfaces that are not provided with lighting in the actual design, and lighting fixtures cannotbe double counted for different exterior surfaces. Report the tradable and non-tradable surface lighting power (broken down by surfacetype) for both the Baseline and Proposed Case in Supplemental Table 1.4 and verify that these values are appropriately reflected in themodel outputs and Tables EAp2-4 and EAp2-5.

EAp3: Fundamental Refrigerant Management Awarded


The LEED Form states that there are no CFC-based refrigerants serving the project building.


EAc1: Optimize Energy Performance Awarded: 17

02/09/2015

11/17/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW

Additional documentation has been provided for EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance claiming an energy cost savings of 40.12%.


The LEED Form states that the project has achieved an energy cost savings of 41.63%. However, to demonstrate compliance, thefollowing must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Refer to the comments within EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance and resubmit this credit.


EAc2: On-Site Renewable Energy Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation and that the project has offset 1.37%of the total energy costs through renewable energy generated on-site.


EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning Awarded: 2

08/18/2015

07/14/2015




The LEED Form states that enhanced commissioning has been implemented. However, to demonstrate compliance, the followingmust be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Refer to the comments within EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning of Building Energy Systems and resubmit this credit.


EAc4: Enhanced Refrigerant Management Awarded: 2


The LEED Form states that there are no refrigerants in the HVAC systems that serve the LEED project. Additionally, all fire suppressionsystems in the LEED project do not use ozone-depleting substances including CFCs, HCFCs, or halons.


EAc5: Measurement and Verification Awarded: 3


The LEED Form states that the project complies with Option 1 and has developed and implemented a Measurement and Verification(M&V) plan consistent with Option D: Calibrated Simulation (Savings Estimation Method) in the IPMVP Volume III: Concepts and Optionsfor Determining Energy Savings in New Construction, April 2003.


EAc6: Green Power Awarded: 2


The LEED Form states that the project has a two-year purchase agreement to procure 35% of electricity for this LEED project that

meets the Green-e definition for renewable power using Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation.

Materials and Resources

MRp1: Storage and Collection of Recyclables Awarded


The LEED Form states that the project has provided appropriately sized dedicated areas for the collection and storage of materials forrecycling.


MRc1.1: Building Reuse-Maintain ExistingWalls, Floors and Roof

Awarded: 3


The LEED Form states that the project is undergoing a major renovation, does not include additions, and that 96% of the existingstructural elements are being reused.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1

MRc1.2: Building Reuse, Maintain 50% ofInterior

Not Attempted


MRc2: Construction Waste Management Awarded: 2


The LEED Form states that the project has diverted 88% of the on-site generated construction waste from landfill.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 2MRc3: Materials Reuse Not Attempted


MRc4: Recycled Content Awarded: 2

08/11/2015

07/14/2015


The additional documentation demonstrates compliance and 33.35% of the total building materials content, by value, has beenmanufactured using recycled materials.


The LEED Form states that 33.39% of the total building materials content, by value, has been manufactured using recycled materials.However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The Algoma Hardwoods wood doors, the Connor Sports Flooring Retroflex flooring, and the Overly Door Company door framing andwood assembly have been included in the calculations for both MRc4: Recycled Content (14% and 15% recycled content) and MRc7:Certified Wood (93% and 89.5% new wood) and the reported sum of the recycled content and new wood content percentages exceeds100%. Provide revised calculations to ensure that the sum of the recycled content and new wood content percentages does not exceed100%. Ensure that the reported information is consistent with MRc7. Additionally, provide a narrative describing how the wood productshave been accounted for in each of the credits. If any of the products listed above are removed from the calculations, ensure that thenarrative explains the reason for their exclusion. Refer to LEED Interpretation 10372 for more information.


MRc5: Regional Materials Awarded: 1

08/11/2015 CONSTRUCTION FINAL REVIEW

The additional documentation demonstrates compliance and 18.18% of the total building materials value includes materials andproducts that have been manufactured and extracted within 500 miles of the project site.


The LEED Form states that 21.76% of the total building materials value includes materials and products that have been manufacturedand extracted within 500 miles of the project site. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Based on the information provided under MRc4, the extraction (or recycle) points for the Hohmann & Barnard dowels, drip edge, stoneanchors, flashing, PTA-420 hot dip, and #407 Threaded Dowls; the Isolatek Cafco Spray Fireproofing; Clark Dietrich metal framing; andall of the Bobrick products require clarification to determine whether they are extracted/harvested/recovered locally. It is unclear whether100% of each material complies. Only the individual raw material components of the product that are extracted/harvested/recovered andmanufactured locally can contribute to credit compliance. More specifically, only the compliant proportion of each product’s individualraw material components by weight can contribute. The point of extraction for a recycled item could include a recycling facility, scrapyard, depository, stockpile, or any other location where the material was collected and packaged for market purchase beforemanufacturing. Therefore, the extraction location for a recycled material may or may not be the same as the manufacturing location. Inmost cases the extraction location for a recycled material will be a recycling facility or scrap yard. Provide documentation, such asmanufacturer's letters or cut sheets, specifying that the materials listed above were manufactured and extracted within a 500 mileradius of the project. Ensure that the extraction location for the recycled content and the raw material content has been accounted for.Ensure that only the portion of the material where the extraction location is known is used toward compliance. Revise the form andLEED Materials and Resource Calculator if necessary.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1MRc6: Rapidly Renewable Materials Not Attempted

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1MRc7: Certified Wood Not Attempted

Indoor Environmental Quality

IEQp1: Minimum Indoor Air QualityPerformance

Awarded

02/09/2015

11/17/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW



The LEED Form states that the project is mechanically ventilated and that the ventilation system has met the minimum requirements ofASHRAE 62.1-2007. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The total area of 83,686 square feet documented for this prerequisite varies substantially from the total gross area of 135,889 squarefeet reported in PIf2: Project Summary Details. It is unclear whether all occupiable space (as defined by ASHRAE 62.1-2007) has beenaccounted for within the ventilation rate procedure calculations. Although some of the difference can be attributed to non-occupiablespaces (e.g., mechanical rooms, inactive stairwells, shafts, and gross versus net area) and space types that are only required to meetthe exhaust requirements of Table 6-4 (e.g., restrooms, kitchens) a justification for any difference in excess of roughly 10% must beprovided. All occupiable spaces (which can include regularly occupied, non-regularly occupied, and unconditioned areas) must beprovided with ventilation that meets the minimum requirements in accordance with ASHRAE 62.1-2007. Update the Ventilation RateProcedure calculations to include all occupiable spaces and ensure that the area is reported consistently among all credits. If thedifference in area is greater than 10%, provide a detailed narrative that describes the approximate area breakdown of the excludedspaces by space type to confirm that all occupiable spaces have been included in the calculations.

2. It is unclear how the free area of each window used for natural ventilation has been calculated. Provide a narrative anddocumentation confirming that all naturally ventilated spaces meet the ASHRAE 62.1-2007 Section 5 requirements and verify theopenable area of the window is a minimum of 4% of the net occupiable floor area for each space in Table IEQp1-3.

3. The mechanical schedule indicates that the minimum outdoor air quantity specified for AHU-5 is 1,200 cfm; however, the ventilationcalculations provided show that 2,940 cfm of minimum outdoor air is required to meet the requirements of ASHRAE 62.1-2007. Pleaseprovide revised schedules or ventilation calculations that display AHU-5 meets the minimum requirements of ASHRAE 62.1-2007.

IEQp2: Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS)Control

Awarded


The LEED Form states that smoking is prohibited within 25 feet of entries, outdoor air intakes, and operable windows. Additionally,smoking is prohibited within the building.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1IEQc1: Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring Not Attempted

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1IEQc2: Increased Ventilation Not Attempted


IEQc3.1: Construction IAQ Management Plan-During Construction

Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project reduces air quality problems resulting from construction to promote the comfort and well-beingof construction workers and building occupants.


IEQc3.2: Construction IAQ Management Plan-Before Occupancy

Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that an Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Management Plan was developed and implemented and that the projectcomplies with Option 1, Path 1: Pre-occupancy flush-out.


IEQc4.1: Low-Emitting Materials-Adhesives andSealants

Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that all adhesive and sealant products used on the inside of the weatherproofing system and applied on-sitehave been included in the tables and comply with the VOC limits of the referenced standards for this credit.


IEQc4.2: Low-Emitting Materials-Paints andCoatings

Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that all paint and coating products used on the inside of the weatherproofing system and applied on-site havebeen included in the tables and comply with the VOC limits of the referenced standards for this credit.


IEQc4.3: Low-Emitting Materials-FlooringSystems

Awarded: 1

08/11/2015

07/14/2015




The LEED Form states that all interior flooring materials meet or exceed applicable criteria for the Carpet and Rug Institute, SouthCoast Air Quality Management District, the California Department of Health Standard, or FloorScore; the carpet adhesives used have aVOC level of less than 50 g/L; all floor finishes meet the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1113; and all tile setting adhesives and groutmeet SCAQMD Rule 1168. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The documentation within BDC Material and Resource Calculator indicates that terrazzo flooring coating and matrix was used in theproject, but is not included in the list for this credit. Confirm that all applicable interior flooring materials and finishes (carpet, carpetpad, hard surface flooring, wall base, floor finishes, and tile setting adhesives and grouts) within the scope of work are listed in thetables. Revise the form and provide additional manufacturer documentation and a narrative if necessary.


IEQc4.4: Low-Emitting Materials-CompositeWood and Agrifiber Products

Awarded: 1

08/11/2015

07/14/2015




The LEED Form states that all composite wood and agrifiber products used on the interior of the building and all laminating adhesivesused to fabricate on-site and shop-applied composite wood and agrifiber assemblies contain no added urea-formaldehyde resins.However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Laminating adhesives have not been included in the table. Revise the form to include all laminating adhesives used to fabricate on-site and shop-applied composite wood and agrifiber assemblies. Provide additional manufacturer documentation and a narrative.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1

IEQc5: Indoor Chemical and Pollutant SourceControl

Not Attempted

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1IEQc6.1: Controllability of Systems-Lighting Awarded: 1

ATTEMPTED: 1, DENIED: 0, PENDING: 0, AWARDED: 1


The LEED Form states that lighting controls are provided for 100% of building occupants and 100% of shared multi-occupant spaces toenable adjustments that meet needs and preferences.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1

IEQc6.2: Controllability of Systems-ThermalComfort

Not Attempted


IEQc7.1: Thermal Comfort-Design Awarded: 1

02/09/2015

11/17/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW



The LEED Form states that the mechanically ventilated and mechanically conditioned project space is in compliance with ASHRAE 55-2004. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The supporting documents indicate the project is using ASHRAE 55-2004 Figure 5.2.1.1 to document design conditions. However,this figure assumes metabolic rates between 1.0 and 1.3 met with ambient air speeds no greater than 40 FPM. Tables IEQc7.1-2 andIEQc7.1-3 indicate all spaces are predicted to have air speeds of 50-60 FPM, and all occupants are estimated to have a metabolic rateof 60, which is significantly higher than expected. While an elevated air speed may be suitable for maintaining thermal comfort, noinformation has been provided supporting the use of an elevated airspeed. Please provide a detailed narrative or additional supportingdocumentation which describes the method used to establish the thermal comfort conditions for the project and how the systemsdesign addresses the design criteria. Ensure that the narrative includes specific information regarding compliance with the referencedASHRAE standard, including occupant metabolic rate and clo value assumptions. If elevated airspeeds above 40 FPM are used tomaintain thermal comfort, provide information on the criteria used for such adjustments, including how the airspeed is under the directcontrol of the affected occupants as required in ASHRAE 55-2004 Section 5.2.3. The Center for the Built Environment has a ThermalComfort Tool that may be used to assist with demonstrating compliance (http://smap.cbe.berkeley.edu/comforttool).


IEQc7.2: Thermal Comfort-Verification Awarded: 1

02/09/2015

11/13/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW



The LEED Form states that a permanent monitoring system will be installed and a thermal comfort survey of building occupants will beconducted between six and 18 months after occupancy. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must be addressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Refer to the comments within IEQc7.1: Thermal Comfort - Design and resubmit this credit.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1IEQc8.1: Daylight and Views-Daylight Not Attempted


IEQc8.2: Daylight and Views-Views Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project has provided direct line of sight views from 90.25% of all regularly occupied spaces.

Innovation in Design


IDc1.1: Green Building Educational Program Awarded: 1

02/09/2015

11/04/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW

The LEED Form has been revised and states that the project team has developed and implemented a Public Education program. Thisstrategy is detailed in the LEED BD+C v2009 Reference Guide. The documentation provided for the development of a case-study andguided tours complies with the Reference Guide requirements.


The LEED Form states that the project team has developed and implemented a Take Back the Tap Program strategy. The main focus ofthe strategy is changing the university population’s attitudes and habits relating to bottled water and making tap water more appealingand convenient to the campus community. A program narrative, a news article, floor plans, photographs, and manufacturer informationhave been provided.

An ID strategy must be significantly better than standard sustainable design practices and meet two basic criteria: 1. quantitativeperformance improvements (comparing a baseline and design case) and 2. a comprehensive strategy (more than one product orprocess). Although commendable, the strategy consists of only one product (water fountain bottle dispensers) and is therefore notcomprehensive. The strategy is not quantified using a baseline and design case. Only those strategies that have significantenvironmental benefits, beyond standard sustainable design practices, are applicable to Innovation in Design credits.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The project may pursue a different Innovation in Design strategy for the Final Review.

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1IDc1.1: Innovation in Design Not Attempted


IDc1.2: Exemplary Performance SS 4.1 Awarded: 1

02/09/2015

11/16/2014

DESIGN FINAL REVIEW

The LEED Form has been revised and states that the project achieves exemplary performance for SSc4.1: Alternative Transportation -Public Transportation Access. The project location has double the transit lines required for the base credit and the total frequency is400 rides per day. The documentation demonstrates compliance for an ID point.


The LEED Form states that the project team has developed and implemented a Transportation Management Plan as specified in theLEED BD+C v2009 Reference Guide and based on LEED Interpretation 532 and related LEED Interpretations. The plan iscomprehensive, and the following have been provided: a narrative description of the plan including employee parking forms, bicycleriding flyers, a campus biking map, and a commuting options flyer. However, to demonstrate compliance, the following must beaddressed.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. The project has not earned three SSc4 credits, as required. Attempt and achieve at least one other SSc4 credit.

2. Provide official documentation for at a least a five-year commitment to the programs, documentation for the number of employeesthat are initially provided program information, and documentation of the policies and procedures that ensure the same service for newemployees. Refer to the Operations and Maintenance Considerations within SSc4.1 of the LEED BD+C v2009 Reference Guide forpossible strategies and refer to LEED Interpretation 532 for an outline of the requirements necessary to document an ID point.



IDc1.3: Green Cleaning Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project team has developed and implemented a Green Housekeeping program. The project mustdemonstrate compliance with LEED-EBOM 2009 IEQp3: Green Cleaning Policy. The Green Cleaning Policy follows the LEED-EBOM

Policy Model and demonstrates the development of a comprehensive and quantitative green cleaning program that includes detailedinformation regarding staff training, cleaning processes and chemicals, and occupant feedback.




IDc1.4: Exemplary Recycled Content Awarded: 1

08/11/2015

07/14/2015


The additional documentation demonstrates compliance for an ID point. The project has documented that 33.35% of the total buildingmaterials content, by value, has been manufactured using recycled materials.


The LEED Form states that the project achieves exemplary performance for MRc4: Recycled Content. The requirement for exemplaryperformance is 30% and the project has documented 33.39%. However, the base credit has not been achieved.

TECHNICAL ADVICE

1. Refer to the comments within MRc4. Ensure that any issues noted there are addressed within the exemplary performancedocumentation when resubmitting this credit.

Alternatively, the project may pursue a different Innovation in Design strategy for the Final Review.


IDc1.5: Integrated Pest Management Awarded: 1


The LEED Form states that the project team has developed and implemented an Integrated Pest Management Plan. The project teammust demonstrate compliance with LEED-EBOM 2009 IEQc3.6: Green Cleaning, Indoor Integrated Pest Management. The IntegratedPest Management program follows LEED-EBOM IEQc3.6 and includes the following: a Universal Notification System to notify buildingoccupants of pesticide applications; defines least toxic pesticide in a manner consistent with the Reference Guide; clearly defines whatconstitutes an emergency circumstance under which an emergency application of pesticides can be conducted; and utilizes integratedmethods, site or pest inspections, pest population monitoring, evaluation of the need for pest control and one or more pest controlmethods.



IDc2: LEED® Accredited Professional Awarded: 1


The LEED Credit Form has been provided stating that a LEED AP has been a participant on the project development team.

Regional priority

POSSIBLE POINTS: 1ATTEMPTED: 1, DENIED: , PENDING: , AWARDED: 1

SSc3: Brownfield Redevelopment


SSc7.2: Heat Island Effect-Roof


EAc2: On-Site Renewable Energy


MRc1.1: Building Reuse-Maintain ExistingWalls, Floors and Roof

TOTAL 110 80 1 0 84

REVIEW SUMMARY

ReviewSUBMITTEDSUBMITTED RETURNEDRETURNED SUBMITTEDSUBMITTED DENIEDDENIED PENDINGPENDING AWARDEDAWARDED

POINTS:

POINTS:Credit STATUS TYPE ATTEMPTED DENIED PENDING AWARDED

PIf1: Minimum Program Requirements Approved 0 0 0 0

PIf2: Project Summary Details Not Approved 0 0 0 0

PIf3: Occupant and Usage Data Approved 0 0 0 0

PIf4: Schedule and Overview Documents Approved 0 0 0 0

SSc1: Site Selection Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1


Pending Design 5 0 5 0

SSc4.1: Alternative Transportation-Public TransportationAccess

Anticipated Design 6 0 0 6

SSc4.4: Alternative Transportation-Parking Capacity Anticipated Design 2 0 0 2

SSc5.2: Site Development-Maximize Open Space Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

SSc7.2: Heat Island Effect, Roof Anticipated Design 2 0 0 2

WEp1: Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction Anticipated Design 0 0 0 0

WEc1: Water Eff icient Landscaping Anticipated Design 2 0 0 4

WEc3: Water Use Reduction Anticipated Design 2 0 0 4

EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance Pending Design 0 0 0 0

EAp3: Fundamental Refrigerant Management Anticipated Design 0 0 0 0

EAc1: Optimize Energy Performance Pending Design 1 0 17 0

EAc4: Enhanced Refrigerant Management Anticipated Design 2 0 0 2

MRp1: Storage and Collection of Recyclables Anticipated Design 0 0 0 0

IEQp1: Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Pending Design 0 0 0 0

IEQp2: Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Anticipated Design 0 0 0 0

IEQc7.1: Thermal Comfort-Design Pending Design 1 0 1 0

IEQc7.2: Thermal Comfort-Verif ication Pending Design 1 0 1 0

IEQc8.2: Daylight and View s-View s Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

IDc1.1: Green Building Educational Program Pending Design 1 0 1 0

IDc1.2: Exemplary Performance SS 4.1 Pending Design 1 0 1 0

IDc1.3: Green Cleaning Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

IDc1.5: Integrated Pest Management Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

Design Preliminary 09/17/2014 11/17/2014 33 0 28 25


PIf2: Project Summary Details Approved 0 0 0 0



SSc3: Brow nfield Redevelopment Anticipated Design 2 0 0 2

SSc4.1: Alternative Transportation-Public TransportationAccess


EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance Anticipated Design 0 0 0 0

EAc1: Optimize Energy Performance Anticipated Design 17 0 0 17

IEQp1: Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance Anticipated Design 0 0 0 0

IEQc6.1: Controllability of Systems-Lighting Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

IEQc7.1: Thermal Comfort-Design Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

IEQc7.2: Thermal Comfort-Verif ication Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

IDc1.1: Green Building Educational Program Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

IDc1.2: Exemplary Performance SS 4.1 Anticipated Design 1 0 0 1

Design Final 01/27/2015 02/10/2015 35 0 0 35


PIf2: Project Summary Details Approved 0 0 0 0

SSp1: Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Pending Construction 0 0 0 0

SSc4.3: Alternative Transportation-Low -Emitting andFuel-Eff icient Vehicles

Awarded Design 3 0 0 3

SSc5.1: Site Development-Protect or Restore Habitat Awarded Construction 1 0 0 1

EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning of the BuildingEnergy Systems

Pending Construction 0 0 0 0

EAc2: On-Site Renew able Energy Awarded Design 2 0 0 2

EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning Pending Construction 2 0 2 0

EAc5: Measurement and Verif ication Awarded Construction 3 0 0 3

EAc6: Green Pow er Awarded Construction 2 0 0 2

MRc1.1: Building Reuse-Maintain Existing Walls, Floorsand Roof

Awarded Construction 4 0 0 4

MRc2: Construction Waste Management Awarded Construction 2 0 0 2

MRc4: Recycled Content Pending Construction 2 0 2 0

MRc5: Regional Materials Pending Construction 2 0 2 0

IEQc3.1: Construction IAQ Management Plan-DuringConstruction


IEQc3.2: Construction IAQ Management Plan-BeforeOccupancy


IEQc4.1: Low -Emitting Materials-Adhesives andSealants


IEQc4.2: Low -Emitting Materials-Paints and Coatings Awarded Construction 1 0 0 1

IEQc4.3: Low -Emitting Materials-Flooring Systems Pending Construction 1 0 1 0

IEQc4.4: Low -Emitting Materials-Composite Wood andAgrif iber Products

Pending Construction 1 0 1 0

IDc1.4: Exemplary Recycled Content Pending Construction 1 0 1 0

IDc2: LEED® Accredited Professional Awarded Construction 1 0 0 1

Construction Preliminary 06/22/2015 07/15/2015 32 0 10 22


SSp1: Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Awarded Construction 0 0 0 0

EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning of the BuildingEnergy Systems


EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning Awarded Construction 2 0 0 2

MRc4: Recycled Content Awarded Construction 2 0 0 2

MRc5: Regional Materials Awarded Construction 1 1 0 1

IEQc4.3: Low -Emitting Materials-Flooring Systems Awarded Construction 1 0 0 1

IEQc4.4: Low -Emitting Materials-Composite Wood andAgrif iber Products


IDc1.4: Exemplary Recycled Content Awarded Construction 1 0 0 1

Construction Final 07/31/2015 08/18/2015 8 1 0 8