Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    1/50

    1

    Blast Effects on Structures and Slopes

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    2/50

    2

    Outline

    Examples of Blasting for Slope and Tunnel Formation

    General Principles of Blasting in Slope and Tunnel

    Limitations of Current Vibration Limit Criterion

    Other Parameters required for better understanding of

    Blast Effects on Slope and Tunnels

    Simplified Finite Element Model for studying Effects of

    Blasting near Slopes

    Future Monitoring Works required to improve the Currentunderstanding of Vibration Limits

    Conclusions

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    3/50

    318 August 1995

    Example 1: Controlled Blasting for Rock Slope Trimming

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    4/50

    4

    Road Widening at Tai Lam Section of Tuen Mun Highway

    Boulder Fall Fatality in 18 August 1995

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    5/50

    5

    Extensive Rock Mapping after Accident

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    6/50

    6

    Risk of Large

    Wedge formed by

    Sheeting Joints

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    7/50

    7

    Scheme Design

    before Tendering

    For

    Constructability

    Purposes

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    8/50

    8

    Direction of blasted rock

    0

    0

    1

    25

    2

    50

    3

    67

    4

    75

    5

    92

    6

    117

    7

    134

    Need to create two Free

    Faces to control

    direction of blasting

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    9/50

    9

    Upper shafts

    Diaphragm Wall

    Lower shafts

    Drill and Blast

    Excavated diameters range between 2.5 m to 50 m

    (SCI) and at a maximum depth over 150 m

    Below the toe of the diaphragm walls 1.5 m long

    blasting holes were used.

    As the ground conditions improved with the

    depth of excavation the shot hole length was

    increased to 2.4 m.

    Two types of full face blasting patterns namely

    wedge cut and parallel hole cut (with relief

    holes) were used.

    Example 2: Controlled Blasting for Shaft Excavation

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    10/50

    Plan View Looking Down

    Sequence of Initiation

    55

    35

    18

    14

    10

    8

    5

    2

    Wedge Cut to create Free Faces

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    11/50

    ICI manufactured explosives Powegel 2500UG (bulk emulsion)

    Pexgel and Tovex are cartridge explosives in 25 mm and 32 mm diameter sizes.

    Pexgel and Excel non-electric detonators, Nonel GT/T non-electric detonators.

    The emulsion was pumped into the blast holes.

    A primer charge with one cartridge and detonator was placed at the bottom of the hole before filling with emulsion.

    The specific charge (powder factor) was approximately 3.6 kg/m3 with the bulk emulsion

    The specific charge was approximately 2.7 kg/m3 with cartridge explosives.

    For the SSDS shaft excavation, the following was used:

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    12/50

    12

    Explosives: The purpose is to generate peak gas pressure and heat in crushing and

    plastically deforming weak/soft rocks, without creating excessive throw, over break,

    ground vibration and air vibration

    Each blast hole should be primed, charged and stemmed so that explosion gases are confined

    for a reasonable period of time.

    Explosives: should have a low cost and a high energy yield per unit weight coupled

    with:

    Insensitivity to initiation by friction, mechanical impact and fire;Totally reliable sensitivity to initiation by the detonator or primer for which the

    explosive has been designed;

    Unlimited resistance to water and low temperatures;

    Oxygen balance and hence minimal yield of poisonous explosion gases;

    Excellent handling characteristics, and

    Unlimited shelf life.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    13/50

    13

    Explosives: grouped into two principal categories:

    High explosives

    (detonator-sensitive)

    1.Emulsion explosive

    2.Watergel explosive

    3.Dynamites (NG (nitroglycerine) sensitized)

    4.Cast Pentolite-type Boosters

    Blasting agents

    (detonator-insensitive)

    Detonating explosives are divided into Primary

    and Secondary. Primary (used in the blasting

    caps and cast primers (mercury fulminate,

    PETN, Pentolite etc.) are used as initiators for

    the Secondary. Secondary are those applied to

    the breakage of rocks.

    Normally can be initiated by No. 8 strength detonator

    or by a strand of 10 g/m detonating cord

    1.Emulsion explosive water-in-oil type (consists of micro

    droplets of super-saturated oxidizer solution within an oil matrix.

    Oxidizer within the micro droplets consists of mainly ammonium

    nitrate (AN)

    Excellent water resistance

    Densities usually lie in the range of 1.1 to 1.2

    g/cm3

    2.Watergel explosive based on saturated aqueous solution of AN in which

    fuels (aluminum powder), sensitizers are dispersed. Have been largely

    replaced by emulsion explosives.

    3.Dynamite explosive are NG-based explosive of high sensitivity

    4.Cast Pentolite-type Boosters boosters to initiate ANFO-type, emulsion and

    watergel blasting agents.

    - make principally of cast pentolite (a mixture of TNT and PETN)

    - completely waterproof

    -ANFO (consists of AN (ammonium

    nitrate) and diesel oil)-Slurries

    -Emulsion

    -Watergel

    -Heavy ANFO

    Blasting agents (detonator-insensitive) consists largely

    of AN (ammonium nitrate is classified as an oxidizing

    agent and not considered to be an explosive).

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    14/50

    14

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    15/50

    15

    ANFO (consists of AN (ammonium nitrate) and diesel oil) AN is a strong supporter for combustion, but it is not flammable itself

    - cost is lower for ANFO and energy yield per ton is usually higher than other explosives- the micro voids within each porous prill of the diesel oil absorb and retain the optimum amount of oil

    - usually used in dry blast hole situations

    Heavy ANFO consists of a mixture of porous prilled AN, oil and an emulsion blasting agent.

    - If the emulsion can fill up the micro void within the ANFO, then the density can reach 1.00 to 1.25 g/cm3

    - should be used in hole diameters of about 100 mm

    - generates about 20% to 50% more energy than an equal volume of ANFO

    Emulsion-based Blasting Agents

    - maintain the properties of the slurries but with improved strength and water resistance

    - cartridged emulsion-based blasting agents

    - bulk emulsion-based blasting agents

    Watergel-based Blasting Agents

    - cartridged watergel-based blasting agents require high-explosive boosters (e.g., PENTEX) to initiate them reliably

    - pumped watergel -based blasting agents

    Slurries are blasting agents based on saturated aqueous solution of AN, often with other

    oxidizers such as sodium nitrate in which fuels, sensitizers, gellants are dispersed toavoid segregation of the solids

    Blasting agents

    1 When an explosive is detonated it is converted within a fewWh d d

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    16/50

    16

    Mechanism of

    Rock Breakage byExplosion

    1. When an explosive is detonated, it is converted within a few

    thousandths of a second into a high temperature gas, pressure

    exceeds about 18000 atmospheres.

    2. This energy is transmitted into the rock in the form of a

    compressive strain wave at a velocity of 2000-6000 m/s.

    3. The rock within 1 to 2 charge radii is crushed by compression.

    4. As the compressive wave front expands, the strain quickly

    decays and beyond this point (pulverized zone), the rock is

    subject to intense radial compression where tangential strains

    start to develop.

    5. When these tangential strains exceed the tensile strength of the

    rock, radial fractures began.

    6. When the compressive wave reaches a free surface, it is

    reflected as a tensile strain wave.

    7. If the reflected tensile strain wave is sufficiently strong,

    spalling occurs progressively from any effective free face

    back toward the blast hole.

    8. This causes unloading of the rock mass, producing an extension

    of previously formed radial cracks.

    9. Rock is much weaker in tension than in compression, thereforethe reflected strain wave is very effective in fracturing the rock.

    10. The expanding gases will wedge open the strain-wave generated

    cracks and expel the rock mass.

    11. The fragmentation process will depend on:

    1. Degree of confinement provided by the stemming(inadequate will cause energy lost).

    2. Charges within the blast hole (inadequate will result in

    poor transmission of strain wave).

    3. Amount ofburden (excessive burden will choke the gas

    expansion).

    4. Sequence of blasting (ensure development of freesurfaces for the rock to move into).

    Why do we need

    to create a free

    face before

    massive

    explosion?

    I iti ti D i d S t

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    17/50

    17

    Initiating Devices and Systems

    Initiating devices and systems are designed to activate explosive charges:

    1. From a safe distance

    2. At a pre-determined time

    3. In a pre-determined sequence and

    4. With pre-determined time intervals between successive detonations

    Initiating systems explosive and inert components which transmit signals to explosive charges by

    non-electric or electric means.

    Non-electric initiating systems utilize chemical reactions, which can range from slow burning torapid violent detonation, to initiate explosive charges either directly or via non-electric detonators.

    Electric initiating systems require a device which can generate or store electrical energy and

    transmit to electric detonators by a circuit of insulated conductors.

    Initiating Devices

    Detonators contain relatively sensitive high explosives which are initiated by an energy signal from an external source.

    Delay detonators incorporate a controlled time delay to sequence the detonations of charges.

    Shock-tube Detonators are Non-electric Detonators assembled from:

    1. A high strength, non-electric detonator which features a PETN base charge and pyrotechnic delay

    elements inside an aluminum shell;

    2. A length of shock tube (one end of the tube is crimped into the detonator shell and the other is closed off

    by a waterproof seal) and

    3. An inert plastic connector (for connecting the shock tube to a trunk line of a detonating cord).

    The energy required to fire a Shock-tube detonator is transmitted by means of a stable shock wave which

    travels through the tube at approximately 2000 m/s. It cannot be initiated by flame, friction or impact andeliminates the accidental initiation by stray electrical currents, static electricity and radio frequency.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    18/50

    18

    Electric Detonators An instantaneo s electric detonator consists of an al min m hich is closed at

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    19/50

    19

    Electric Detonators An instantaneous electric detonator consists of an aluminum which is closed at

    one end and contains a base charge of high-explosive PETN, a sensitive priming charge and an electric

    fuse head. The fuse head consists of a fine metal bridge wire which is surrounded by a sensitive

    flashing composition, and is soldered across the ends of two insulated lead wires. The lead wires pass

    through a rubber plug which is securely crimped into the shell to provide a water-resistant seal.

    When sufficient electrical energy is passed through the lead wires, the fine bridge wire becomes hot

    enough to ignite the fuse head, which initiates the priming charge and the powerful PETN base charge.

    Instantaneous electric detonators with a No. 8 or higher strength base charge are recommended as

    starter detonators for initiating detonating cord trunk lines.

    No. 8 strength detonators have explosive mixture equivalent to 2 g of 80% mercury fulminate and 20% potassium chlorate.

    Electric Detonator Electric Detonator with Delay

    Aluminum powder

    Electronic Detonator

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    20/50

    20

    Detonating Cords they are strong, flexible linear explosives which consists of a continuous core of high

    explosive, covered by a seamless plastic jacket which may be over-wrapped with other textile yarns.

    All cords suitable for use in construction blasting contain PETN, a high-explosive powder, and detonate at 6.0 to7.5 km/s. Detonating cords designed for specific tasks have PETN core charges ranging from 1.5 g/m to 85 g/m,

    enclosed in appropriate outer cover.

    Energy sources such as static electricity, stray electrical currents or radio frequency transmissions will not

    initiate detonating cord.

    Detonating cords can be reliably initiated by means of a No. 8 strength detonator which is firmly attached to a

    dry section of cord at least 150 mm from the cut end.

    Detonating Cord

    Contains explosive charge of 10 g of PETN per meter run

    Diameter nominally 4.65 mm

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    21/50

    21

    Detonating Cord Trunk Line they are cords with core load of 3.6 to 10.0 g/m that will allow

    transmission of signal from one point to another even though joins are made by simple knots.

    Detonating Cord Down Line detonating cord can be reliably initiated by non-electric trunk linedelays.

    Initiating Systems

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    22/50

    22

    Initiating Systems

    Initiating Systems for Bench-Type Blasts

    1. MS (millisecond)-delay shock-tube detonators are used inside blast holes. Short delay

    times are used between blast holes, to ensure that they interact effectively to producegood fragmentation.

    2. A trunk line of 3.6 to 5.0 g/m detonating cord is used to initiate the in-hole shock-tube

    detonators.

    3. Two instantaneous No. 8 strength electric detonators are used to initiate the detonating

    cord trunk line.

    Initiating Systems for Tunnelling

    1. LP (long-period)-delay shock-tube detonators are used inside blast holes. Relatively

    long delay times are required between blast holes, to ensure that broken rock iseffectively ejected during the blast.

    2. A trunk line of 3.6 to 5.0 g/m detonating cord is used to initiate the in-hole shock-tube

    detonators.

    3. Two instantaneous No. 8 strength electric detonators are used to initiate the detonating

    cord trunk line. Two detonators are used to ensure reliable initiation.

    LP Detonators long period delay intervals for tunneling

    MS Detonators millisecond delay intervals for benching type operations

    T & D Detonators - millisecond delay intervals with an additional connector to enable them to be used as Trunk Line

    Delays between blast holes.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    23/50

    23

    Production Bench Blasting The production of a well-fragmented and loose

    muck pile that can be handled easily requires the

    understanding of the following parameters:

    1. Type of explosive

    2. Properties of the rock being blasted

    3. Blast hole diameter

    4. Blast hole inclination

    5. Effective burden

    6. Effective sub-drilling

    7. Effective spacing

    8. Stemming

    9. Initiation sequence for detonation of explosive

    charges

    10. Delays between successive blast holes and/or

    rows of blast hole

    J i t b ddi l f lt ft

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    24/50

    24

    Production Bench Blasting TerminologyJoints, bedding planes, faults, or soft seams may

    allow the explosives energy to be wastefully

    dissipated rather than performing the work.

    Pre-existing fractures may tend to dominate the

    nature of the fracture pattern produced by a

    detonating blast hole.

    In order to maintain a constant burden with

    depth, all blast holes should be inclined.

    Sub-drilling is necessary in order to break therock at bench level. Breakage of the rock usually

    projects from the explosive charge in the form of

    an inverted cone with sides inclined at 100 and

    200 to the horizontal. Experience has shown that

    effective sub-drilling equal to 8 times the blast

    hole diameter is usually adequate to ensure

    effective digging to grade.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    25/50

    25Blasting to a a) free face, b) free end and c) buffered end

    1 Free Face

    2 Free Faces

    Free Face away

    from previously

    blasted rock

    Too small a burden allows the radial cracks to extend to the free face giving rise to rapid venting of explosion

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    26/50

    26

    Too small a burden allows the radial cracks to extend to the free face, giving rise to rapid venting of explosion

    gases with a consequent loss of efficiency and the generation of fly rock and air blast problems.

    Too large a burden chokes the blast and gives rise to very poor fragmentation and a general loss of efficiency.

    Experience has shown that the explosive charge is most efficient when theburden is equal to 25 to 35 times the

    blast hole diameter.

    Effective burden and spacing depends onblast hole pattern and sequence of firing

    A square pattern which is fired row by row

    gives an effective burden equal to the

    spacing between successive rows

    Identical pattern fired at differentsequence, resulting in different burden and

    spacing

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    27/50

    27

    When the free face is uneven, the use of

    easer blast hole, to reduce the burden, is

    recommended.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    28/50

    28

    Blast is broken down into a number of

    successive detonations by means of delays

    Most simplest but not the most satisfactory

    For use in strong rock where near vertical joints

    strike across the bench at an angle to the face.

    For use in condition where the strike of two

    joint sets intersect.

    When free face is not available.

    Golder Associates (1992)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    29/50

    29

    When the front row is detonated and moves away from the rock mass to create a new free face, time should be

    allowed for this new face to be established before the next row is detonated.

    Typically, minimum delay intervals of 5 to 8 ms per meter of burden are used. A typical blast with a burden of

    2 m would have a delay of at least 15 ms between rows.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    30/50

    30

    Experience has shown that:

    a staggered pattern with an effective spacing equal to 2.0 times the effective burden gives

    good results.

    The use of stemming is to direct explosives effort into the rock mass.

    The optimum stemming length depends on the properties of the rock and can vary

    between 0.7 to 1.0 times the burden.

    The blasting sequence should always be such that the blast holes detonate in rows starting

    at the free face.

    When the front row is detonated and moves away from the rock mass to create a new free

    face, time should be allowed for this new face to be established before the next row is

    detonated.

    Typically, minimum delay intervals of 5 to 8 ms per meter of burden are used. A typical

    blast with a burden of 2 m would have a delay of at least 15 ms between rows.

    Side-Hill Blasting

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    31/50

    31

    Side Hill Blasting

    Most side-hill cuts require that the

    muck pile be retained within the

    boundaries of the cut. By designing

    the delay pattern with the V offset

    from the centerline, the principal

    direction of rock movement is largely

    up the slope.

    Design is based upon the use of

    millisecond delay detonators located

    well down within the blast holes.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    32/50

    32Principal direction of rock movement changes

    as the angle within the V (angle ) increases.

    Square Pattern

    Staggered Pattern

    Rectangular Pattern

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    33/50

    33

    Principal direction of rock movement is down

    the hillside.

    Purposely dispose the rock down the hill for

    bench blasting

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    34/50

    34

    Golder Associates (1992)

    Smooth Wall Blasting using Pre-splitting (Pre-shearing) Technique

    Requires greater amount of

    drilling, higher drilling accuracy

    Involves drilling a row of closely

    spaced 38-89 mm diameter blast

    holes along the design excavation

    limit.

    Blast holes are lightly charged

    and detonated simultaneously.

    Pre-split blast holes can be fired

    either as a separate shot or with

    the production blast (pre-split

    should detonate about 50 ms

    before the earliest-firing

    production blast holes).

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    35/50

    35

    Golder Associates (1992)

    Spacing between pre-split

    blast holes normally

    increases with the blast

    hole diameter.

    Heavily charged detonating

    cord can also be used as the

    entire pre-splitting chargerather than attaching half

    cartridges or whole

    cartridges of explosives to

    a detonating cord.

    Creation of Free Face for Blasting in Tunnels

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    36/50

    36

    Nomenclature used in Tunnelling

    Hole Type used in a Round

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    37/50

    37

    Blasting in Tunnels and Caverns

    General rules for design of burn-cut:

    Maximize the number and diameter of

    (uncharged relief holes A and B)

    Locate blast holes such that each isshielded by a relief hole. Shielding

    refers to the practice of drilling relief

    holes directly in line between blast

    holes that may have an adverse effectto one another

    Initiate charges with long period so that

    any compression of a later-firing

    charge is given the opportunity to relax.

    Blast hole 1, 2 and 3 are shielded bythe relief holes

    Each charge has two or three relief

    holes to which it can shoot

    Any ground movement or

    deformation and gas venting tends to

    be into the relief holes rather than into

    a blast hole on a later delay

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    38/50

    38Wedge Cut

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    39/50

    39

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    40/50

    40

    Width of blast round 4.6 m

    Height of blast round 7.6 m

    Blast hole diameter 43 mm

    Blast hole length 1.5 m

    Number of blast holes 55

    Diameter of relief holes 102 mm

    Length of relief holes 1.7 m

    Number of relief holes 3

    Types of explosives: 32x300 mm cartridge of

    Powergel

    Exel (non-electric) detonators

    MS delay numbers 4 to 30

    Exel LPD number 10 to 15

    TLD (trunk line delay) 0 ms, 17 ms and 34 ms

    Powder factor: 1.51 kg/m3

    Maximum charge per delay 1.138 kg

    Estimated PPV at sensitive location

    (43 m away) 11 mm/s

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    41/50

    41

    Exel LPD number 10 to 15

    MS delay numbers 4 to 30

    TLD (trunk line delay) 0 ms,

    17 ms and 34 ms

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    42/50

    42

    Tunnels with small cross sectional area generally

    require higher energy factor/powder factor than those

    with large cross sectional area because of the high

    concentrations of explosives in the cut.

    Powder factor is affected by:

    Blast hole diameter

    Type and geometry of cut

    Mean advance per round

    Blasting Shafts

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    43/50

    43

    Blasting Shafts

    Blasting pattern for small round(this case 1.2 m x 1.8 m)

    Short advance of 0.9 m to 1.0 m

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    44/50

    44

    Blasting pattern for largerrectangular and square shafts

    A V cut is used

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    45/50

    45

    Blasting pattern for larger

    circular shafts (4 m or greaterdiameter)

    A pyramid cut is used

    Influence of Rock Mass Properties on Blasting

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    46/50

    46

    Influence of Rock Mass Properties on Blasting

    Brady and Brown (1985)

    Empirical correlation between explosive

    type and rock mass properties. Bradyand Brown (1985) suggested that uniaxial

    compressive strength may be used to

    represent the ease of generating new

    fractures in the medium.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    47/50

    47

    Rzhevsky and Novik (1971)

    Generalized classification adopted in Soviet

    Union, based on unit consumption of

    Ammonite No. 9 (AN based blasting agent).

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    48/50

    48

    Kutuzov (1979)

    Generalized correlation between compressive strength and

    powder factor in bench blastings

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    49/50

    49Ashby (1977)

    Empirical correlation

    between fracturefrequency, shear

    strength and powder

    factor of the explosive

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)

    50/50

    50

    Blastability Index (Lilly, 1986)

    correlates to geomechanical

    parameters

    )(5.0 HDSGIJPOJPSRMDBI ++++=