Upload
chouszesze
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
1/50
1
Blast Effects on Structures and Slopes
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
2/50
2
Outline
Examples of Blasting for Slope and Tunnel Formation
General Principles of Blasting in Slope and Tunnel
Limitations of Current Vibration Limit Criterion
Other Parameters required for better understanding of
Blast Effects on Slope and Tunnels
Simplified Finite Element Model for studying Effects of
Blasting near Slopes
Future Monitoring Works required to improve the Currentunderstanding of Vibration Limits
Conclusions
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
3/50
318 August 1995
Example 1: Controlled Blasting for Rock Slope Trimming
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
4/50
4
Road Widening at Tai Lam Section of Tuen Mun Highway
Boulder Fall Fatality in 18 August 1995
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
5/50
5
Extensive Rock Mapping after Accident
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
6/50
6
Risk of Large
Wedge formed by
Sheeting Joints
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
7/50
7
Scheme Design
before Tendering
For
Constructability
Purposes
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
8/50
8
Direction of blasted rock
0
0
1
25
2
50
3
67
4
75
5
92
6
117
7
134
Need to create two Free
Faces to control
direction of blasting
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
9/50
9
Upper shafts
Diaphragm Wall
Lower shafts
Drill and Blast
Excavated diameters range between 2.5 m to 50 m
(SCI) and at a maximum depth over 150 m
Below the toe of the diaphragm walls 1.5 m long
blasting holes were used.
As the ground conditions improved with the
depth of excavation the shot hole length was
increased to 2.4 m.
Two types of full face blasting patterns namely
wedge cut and parallel hole cut (with relief
holes) were used.
Example 2: Controlled Blasting for Shaft Excavation
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
10/50
Plan View Looking Down
Sequence of Initiation
55
35
18
14
10
8
5
2
Wedge Cut to create Free Faces
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
11/50
ICI manufactured explosives Powegel 2500UG (bulk emulsion)
Pexgel and Tovex are cartridge explosives in 25 mm and 32 mm diameter sizes.
Pexgel and Excel non-electric detonators, Nonel GT/T non-electric detonators.
The emulsion was pumped into the blast holes.
A primer charge with one cartridge and detonator was placed at the bottom of the hole before filling with emulsion.
The specific charge (powder factor) was approximately 3.6 kg/m3 with the bulk emulsion
The specific charge was approximately 2.7 kg/m3 with cartridge explosives.
For the SSDS shaft excavation, the following was used:
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
12/50
12
Explosives: The purpose is to generate peak gas pressure and heat in crushing and
plastically deforming weak/soft rocks, without creating excessive throw, over break,
ground vibration and air vibration
Each blast hole should be primed, charged and stemmed so that explosion gases are confined
for a reasonable period of time.
Explosives: should have a low cost and a high energy yield per unit weight coupled
with:
Insensitivity to initiation by friction, mechanical impact and fire;Totally reliable sensitivity to initiation by the detonator or primer for which the
explosive has been designed;
Unlimited resistance to water and low temperatures;
Oxygen balance and hence minimal yield of poisonous explosion gases;
Excellent handling characteristics, and
Unlimited shelf life.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
13/50
13
Explosives: grouped into two principal categories:
High explosives
(detonator-sensitive)
1.Emulsion explosive
2.Watergel explosive
3.Dynamites (NG (nitroglycerine) sensitized)
4.Cast Pentolite-type Boosters
Blasting agents
(detonator-insensitive)
Detonating explosives are divided into Primary
and Secondary. Primary (used in the blasting
caps and cast primers (mercury fulminate,
PETN, Pentolite etc.) are used as initiators for
the Secondary. Secondary are those applied to
the breakage of rocks.
Normally can be initiated by No. 8 strength detonator
or by a strand of 10 g/m detonating cord
1.Emulsion explosive water-in-oil type (consists of micro
droplets of super-saturated oxidizer solution within an oil matrix.
Oxidizer within the micro droplets consists of mainly ammonium
nitrate (AN)
Excellent water resistance
Densities usually lie in the range of 1.1 to 1.2
g/cm3
2.Watergel explosive based on saturated aqueous solution of AN in which
fuels (aluminum powder), sensitizers are dispersed. Have been largely
replaced by emulsion explosives.
3.Dynamite explosive are NG-based explosive of high sensitivity
4.Cast Pentolite-type Boosters boosters to initiate ANFO-type, emulsion and
watergel blasting agents.
- make principally of cast pentolite (a mixture of TNT and PETN)
- completely waterproof
-ANFO (consists of AN (ammonium
nitrate) and diesel oil)-Slurries
-Emulsion
-Watergel
-Heavy ANFO
Blasting agents (detonator-insensitive) consists largely
of AN (ammonium nitrate is classified as an oxidizing
agent and not considered to be an explosive).
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
14/50
14
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
15/50
15
ANFO (consists of AN (ammonium nitrate) and diesel oil) AN is a strong supporter for combustion, but it is not flammable itself
- cost is lower for ANFO and energy yield per ton is usually higher than other explosives- the micro voids within each porous prill of the diesel oil absorb and retain the optimum amount of oil
- usually used in dry blast hole situations
Heavy ANFO consists of a mixture of porous prilled AN, oil and an emulsion blasting agent.
- If the emulsion can fill up the micro void within the ANFO, then the density can reach 1.00 to 1.25 g/cm3
- should be used in hole diameters of about 100 mm
- generates about 20% to 50% more energy than an equal volume of ANFO
Emulsion-based Blasting Agents
- maintain the properties of the slurries but with improved strength and water resistance
- cartridged emulsion-based blasting agents
- bulk emulsion-based blasting agents
Watergel-based Blasting Agents
- cartridged watergel-based blasting agents require high-explosive boosters (e.g., PENTEX) to initiate them reliably
- pumped watergel -based blasting agents
Slurries are blasting agents based on saturated aqueous solution of AN, often with other
oxidizers such as sodium nitrate in which fuels, sensitizers, gellants are dispersed toavoid segregation of the solids
Blasting agents
1 When an explosive is detonated it is converted within a fewWh d d
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
16/50
16
Mechanism of
Rock Breakage byExplosion
1. When an explosive is detonated, it is converted within a few
thousandths of a second into a high temperature gas, pressure
exceeds about 18000 atmospheres.
2. This energy is transmitted into the rock in the form of a
compressive strain wave at a velocity of 2000-6000 m/s.
3. The rock within 1 to 2 charge radii is crushed by compression.
4. As the compressive wave front expands, the strain quickly
decays and beyond this point (pulverized zone), the rock is
subject to intense radial compression where tangential strains
start to develop.
5. When these tangential strains exceed the tensile strength of the
rock, radial fractures began.
6. When the compressive wave reaches a free surface, it is
reflected as a tensile strain wave.
7. If the reflected tensile strain wave is sufficiently strong,
spalling occurs progressively from any effective free face
back toward the blast hole.
8. This causes unloading of the rock mass, producing an extension
of previously formed radial cracks.
9. Rock is much weaker in tension than in compression, thereforethe reflected strain wave is very effective in fracturing the rock.
10. The expanding gases will wedge open the strain-wave generated
cracks and expel the rock mass.
11. The fragmentation process will depend on:
1. Degree of confinement provided by the stemming(inadequate will cause energy lost).
2. Charges within the blast hole (inadequate will result in
poor transmission of strain wave).
3. Amount ofburden (excessive burden will choke the gas
expansion).
4. Sequence of blasting (ensure development of freesurfaces for the rock to move into).
Why do we need
to create a free
face before
massive
explosion?
I iti ti D i d S t
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
17/50
17
Initiating Devices and Systems
Initiating devices and systems are designed to activate explosive charges:
1. From a safe distance
2. At a pre-determined time
3. In a pre-determined sequence and
4. With pre-determined time intervals between successive detonations
Initiating systems explosive and inert components which transmit signals to explosive charges by
non-electric or electric means.
Non-electric initiating systems utilize chemical reactions, which can range from slow burning torapid violent detonation, to initiate explosive charges either directly or via non-electric detonators.
Electric initiating systems require a device which can generate or store electrical energy and
transmit to electric detonators by a circuit of insulated conductors.
Initiating Devices
Detonators contain relatively sensitive high explosives which are initiated by an energy signal from an external source.
Delay detonators incorporate a controlled time delay to sequence the detonations of charges.
Shock-tube Detonators are Non-electric Detonators assembled from:
1. A high strength, non-electric detonator which features a PETN base charge and pyrotechnic delay
elements inside an aluminum shell;
2. A length of shock tube (one end of the tube is crimped into the detonator shell and the other is closed off
by a waterproof seal) and
3. An inert plastic connector (for connecting the shock tube to a trunk line of a detonating cord).
The energy required to fire a Shock-tube detonator is transmitted by means of a stable shock wave which
travels through the tube at approximately 2000 m/s. It cannot be initiated by flame, friction or impact andeliminates the accidental initiation by stray electrical currents, static electricity and radio frequency.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
18/50
18
Electric Detonators An instantaneo s electric detonator consists of an al min m hich is closed at
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
19/50
19
Electric Detonators An instantaneous electric detonator consists of an aluminum which is closed at
one end and contains a base charge of high-explosive PETN, a sensitive priming charge and an electric
fuse head. The fuse head consists of a fine metal bridge wire which is surrounded by a sensitive
flashing composition, and is soldered across the ends of two insulated lead wires. The lead wires pass
through a rubber plug which is securely crimped into the shell to provide a water-resistant seal.
When sufficient electrical energy is passed through the lead wires, the fine bridge wire becomes hot
enough to ignite the fuse head, which initiates the priming charge and the powerful PETN base charge.
Instantaneous electric detonators with a No. 8 or higher strength base charge are recommended as
starter detonators for initiating detonating cord trunk lines.
No. 8 strength detonators have explosive mixture equivalent to 2 g of 80% mercury fulminate and 20% potassium chlorate.
Electric Detonator Electric Detonator with Delay
Aluminum powder
Electronic Detonator
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
20/50
20
Detonating Cords they are strong, flexible linear explosives which consists of a continuous core of high
explosive, covered by a seamless plastic jacket which may be over-wrapped with other textile yarns.
All cords suitable for use in construction blasting contain PETN, a high-explosive powder, and detonate at 6.0 to7.5 km/s. Detonating cords designed for specific tasks have PETN core charges ranging from 1.5 g/m to 85 g/m,
enclosed in appropriate outer cover.
Energy sources such as static electricity, stray electrical currents or radio frequency transmissions will not
initiate detonating cord.
Detonating cords can be reliably initiated by means of a No. 8 strength detonator which is firmly attached to a
dry section of cord at least 150 mm from the cut end.
Detonating Cord
Contains explosive charge of 10 g of PETN per meter run
Diameter nominally 4.65 mm
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
21/50
21
Detonating Cord Trunk Line they are cords with core load of 3.6 to 10.0 g/m that will allow
transmission of signal from one point to another even though joins are made by simple knots.
Detonating Cord Down Line detonating cord can be reliably initiated by non-electric trunk linedelays.
Initiating Systems
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
22/50
22
Initiating Systems
Initiating Systems for Bench-Type Blasts
1. MS (millisecond)-delay shock-tube detonators are used inside blast holes. Short delay
times are used between blast holes, to ensure that they interact effectively to producegood fragmentation.
2. A trunk line of 3.6 to 5.0 g/m detonating cord is used to initiate the in-hole shock-tube
detonators.
3. Two instantaneous No. 8 strength electric detonators are used to initiate the detonating
cord trunk line.
Initiating Systems for Tunnelling
1. LP (long-period)-delay shock-tube detonators are used inside blast holes. Relatively
long delay times are required between blast holes, to ensure that broken rock iseffectively ejected during the blast.
2. A trunk line of 3.6 to 5.0 g/m detonating cord is used to initiate the in-hole shock-tube
detonators.
3. Two instantaneous No. 8 strength electric detonators are used to initiate the detonating
cord trunk line. Two detonators are used to ensure reliable initiation.
LP Detonators long period delay intervals for tunneling
MS Detonators millisecond delay intervals for benching type operations
T & D Detonators - millisecond delay intervals with an additional connector to enable them to be used as Trunk Line
Delays between blast holes.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
23/50
23
Production Bench Blasting The production of a well-fragmented and loose
muck pile that can be handled easily requires the
understanding of the following parameters:
1. Type of explosive
2. Properties of the rock being blasted
3. Blast hole diameter
4. Blast hole inclination
5. Effective burden
6. Effective sub-drilling
7. Effective spacing
8. Stemming
9. Initiation sequence for detonation of explosive
charges
10. Delays between successive blast holes and/or
rows of blast hole
J i t b ddi l f lt ft
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
24/50
24
Production Bench Blasting TerminologyJoints, bedding planes, faults, or soft seams may
allow the explosives energy to be wastefully
dissipated rather than performing the work.
Pre-existing fractures may tend to dominate the
nature of the fracture pattern produced by a
detonating blast hole.
In order to maintain a constant burden with
depth, all blast holes should be inclined.
Sub-drilling is necessary in order to break therock at bench level. Breakage of the rock usually
projects from the explosive charge in the form of
an inverted cone with sides inclined at 100 and
200 to the horizontal. Experience has shown that
effective sub-drilling equal to 8 times the blast
hole diameter is usually adequate to ensure
effective digging to grade.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
25/50
25Blasting to a a) free face, b) free end and c) buffered end
1 Free Face
2 Free Faces
Free Face away
from previously
blasted rock
Too small a burden allows the radial cracks to extend to the free face giving rise to rapid venting of explosion
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
26/50
26
Too small a burden allows the radial cracks to extend to the free face, giving rise to rapid venting of explosion
gases with a consequent loss of efficiency and the generation of fly rock and air blast problems.
Too large a burden chokes the blast and gives rise to very poor fragmentation and a general loss of efficiency.
Experience has shown that the explosive charge is most efficient when theburden is equal to 25 to 35 times the
blast hole diameter.
Effective burden and spacing depends onblast hole pattern and sequence of firing
A square pattern which is fired row by row
gives an effective burden equal to the
spacing between successive rows
Identical pattern fired at differentsequence, resulting in different burden and
spacing
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
27/50
27
When the free face is uneven, the use of
easer blast hole, to reduce the burden, is
recommended.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
28/50
28
Blast is broken down into a number of
successive detonations by means of delays
Most simplest but not the most satisfactory
For use in strong rock where near vertical joints
strike across the bench at an angle to the face.
For use in condition where the strike of two
joint sets intersect.
When free face is not available.
Golder Associates (1992)
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
29/50
29
When the front row is detonated and moves away from the rock mass to create a new free face, time should be
allowed for this new face to be established before the next row is detonated.
Typically, minimum delay intervals of 5 to 8 ms per meter of burden are used. A typical blast with a burden of
2 m would have a delay of at least 15 ms between rows.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
30/50
30
Experience has shown that:
a staggered pattern with an effective spacing equal to 2.0 times the effective burden gives
good results.
The use of stemming is to direct explosives effort into the rock mass.
The optimum stemming length depends on the properties of the rock and can vary
between 0.7 to 1.0 times the burden.
The blasting sequence should always be such that the blast holes detonate in rows starting
at the free face.
When the front row is detonated and moves away from the rock mass to create a new free
face, time should be allowed for this new face to be established before the next row is
detonated.
Typically, minimum delay intervals of 5 to 8 ms per meter of burden are used. A typical
blast with a burden of 2 m would have a delay of at least 15 ms between rows.
Side-Hill Blasting
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
31/50
31
Side Hill Blasting
Most side-hill cuts require that the
muck pile be retained within the
boundaries of the cut. By designing
the delay pattern with the V offset
from the centerline, the principal
direction of rock movement is largely
up the slope.
Design is based upon the use of
millisecond delay detonators located
well down within the blast holes.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
32/50
32Principal direction of rock movement changes
as the angle within the V (angle ) increases.
Square Pattern
Staggered Pattern
Rectangular Pattern
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
33/50
33
Principal direction of rock movement is down
the hillside.
Purposely dispose the rock down the hill for
bench blasting
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
34/50
34
Golder Associates (1992)
Smooth Wall Blasting using Pre-splitting (Pre-shearing) Technique
Requires greater amount of
drilling, higher drilling accuracy
Involves drilling a row of closely
spaced 38-89 mm diameter blast
holes along the design excavation
limit.
Blast holes are lightly charged
and detonated simultaneously.
Pre-split blast holes can be fired
either as a separate shot or with
the production blast (pre-split
should detonate about 50 ms
before the earliest-firing
production blast holes).
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
35/50
35
Golder Associates (1992)
Spacing between pre-split
blast holes normally
increases with the blast
hole diameter.
Heavily charged detonating
cord can also be used as the
entire pre-splitting chargerather than attaching half
cartridges or whole
cartridges of explosives to
a detonating cord.
Creation of Free Face for Blasting in Tunnels
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
36/50
36
Nomenclature used in Tunnelling
Hole Type used in a Round
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
37/50
37
Blasting in Tunnels and Caverns
General rules for design of burn-cut:
Maximize the number and diameter of
(uncharged relief holes A and B)
Locate blast holes such that each isshielded by a relief hole. Shielding
refers to the practice of drilling relief
holes directly in line between blast
holes that may have an adverse effectto one another
Initiate charges with long period so that
any compression of a later-firing
charge is given the opportunity to relax.
Blast hole 1, 2 and 3 are shielded bythe relief holes
Each charge has two or three relief
holes to which it can shoot
Any ground movement or
deformation and gas venting tends to
be into the relief holes rather than into
a blast hole on a later delay
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
38/50
38Wedge Cut
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
39/50
39
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
40/50
40
Width of blast round 4.6 m
Height of blast round 7.6 m
Blast hole diameter 43 mm
Blast hole length 1.5 m
Number of blast holes 55
Diameter of relief holes 102 mm
Length of relief holes 1.7 m
Number of relief holes 3
Types of explosives: 32x300 mm cartridge of
Powergel
Exel (non-electric) detonators
MS delay numbers 4 to 30
Exel LPD number 10 to 15
TLD (trunk line delay) 0 ms, 17 ms and 34 ms
Powder factor: 1.51 kg/m3
Maximum charge per delay 1.138 kg
Estimated PPV at sensitive location
(43 m away) 11 mm/s
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
41/50
41
Exel LPD number 10 to 15
MS delay numbers 4 to 30
TLD (trunk line delay) 0 ms,
17 ms and 34 ms
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
42/50
42
Tunnels with small cross sectional area generally
require higher energy factor/powder factor than those
with large cross sectional area because of the high
concentrations of explosives in the cut.
Powder factor is affected by:
Blast hole diameter
Type and geometry of cut
Mean advance per round
Blasting Shafts
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
43/50
43
Blasting Shafts
Blasting pattern for small round(this case 1.2 m x 1.8 m)
Short advance of 0.9 m to 1.0 m
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
44/50
44
Blasting pattern for largerrectangular and square shafts
A V cut is used
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
45/50
45
Blasting pattern for larger
circular shafts (4 m or greaterdiameter)
A pyramid cut is used
Influence of Rock Mass Properties on Blasting
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
46/50
46
Influence of Rock Mass Properties on Blasting
Brady and Brown (1985)
Empirical correlation between explosive
type and rock mass properties. Bradyand Brown (1985) suggested that uniaxial
compressive strength may be used to
represent the ease of generating new
fractures in the medium.
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
47/50
47
Rzhevsky and Novik (1971)
Generalized classification adopted in Soviet
Union, based on unit consumption of
Ammonite No. 9 (AN based blasting agent).
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
48/50
48
Kutuzov (1979)
Generalized correlation between compressive strength and
powder factor in bench blastings
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
49/50
49Ashby (1977)
Empirical correlation
between fracturefrequency, shear
strength and powder
factor of the explosive
8/13/2019 Lecture13A(BlastingforRockTunneling)
50/50
50
Blastability Index (Lilly, 1986)
correlates to geomechanical
parameters
)(5.0 HDSGIJPOJPSRMDBI ++++=