Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
1
Lecture 3
Study of Nanoscale
Phenomena by Magnetic
Properties Measurements
Dr. Javad Mola
Institute of Iron and Steel Technology (IEST)
Tel: 03731 39 2407
E-mail: [email protected]
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
2
Introduction
This lecture demonstrates how quick and straightforward magnetic
measurements could be used to obtain information regarding nanoscale
phenomena such as the redistribution of alloying elements. Due to
occurrence over a small scale, such phenomena are otherwise difficult
to study directly since their direct examination requires access to
analytical tools with a high spatial resolution (e.g. Atom Probe
Tomography, Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy in a Transmission
Electron Microscope, …). Even specimen preparation for such methods
could be difficult and timely.
After a brief review of ferromagnetism, the following case studies are
presented:
- Precise retained austenite quantification
- Redistribution of alloying elements between martensite and
tempering carbides
- Redistribution of Mn between martensite and austenite during
intercritical annealing of a high Mn steel
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
3
Direct Observation of Elemental Partitioning
Low-alloy steel AISI 4340
Tempered 2 h at 325 °C Tempered 2 h at 450 °C
Martensitic Matrix
Martensitic Matrix
M3C
M3C
A.J. Clarke, M.K. Miller, R.D. Field, D.R. Coughlin, P.J. Gibbs, K.D. Clarke, D.J. Alexander, K.A. Powers, P.A. Papin, G. Krauss, Acta Mater. 77 (2014) 17–27.
Atom Probe Tomography (APT) investigations for the observation of nanoscale elemental redistribution phenomena
Advantage: very high resolutions achievable
Disadvantage: limited access, time-consuming and costly specimen preparation and measurements
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
4
Direct Observation of Elemental PartitioningAtom probe tomography (APT) results for an Fe-9.66Mn-2.98C (at.%) steel after aging at
600 °C for 6 hferrite
austenite
M.M. Aranda, R. Rementeria, J. Poplawsky, E. Urones-Garrote, C. Capdevila, Scr. Mater. 104 (2015) 67–70.
austenite
cementite
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
5
Direct Observation of Elemental Partitioning
0 10 20 30 400
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Ma
ss
-% M
n
Position
γ
γ
Fe-7Mn-0.1C steel heat treated
at 600 °C (α + range)
A
B
BA
Bruno C. De Cooman, P. Gibbs, S. Lee, D.K. Matlock, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44 (2013) 2563–2572.
TEM-EDS analysis (time-consuming specimen preparation, lower resolution compared to APT)
Partitioning of Mn between ferrite and austenite during intercritical annealing of medium Mn
steels. The Mn content of austenite influences its deformation-induced processes and
mechanical properties of the duplex ferritic-austenitic microstructure.
Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy
(EDS) analysis in TEM
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
6
Tensile engineering stress-strain curves for
Fe-7.1Mn steel annealed for 1 week at
various temperatures.
Evolution of retained austenite fraction
with strain for Fe-7.1Mn steel
Effect of Elemental Partitioning on Tensile Behavior
P.J. Gibbs, E.D. Moor, M.J. Merwin, B. Clausen, J.G. Speer, D.K. Matlock, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 42 (2011) 3691–3702.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
7
Indirect Investigation of Partitioning PhenomenaIf the partitioning of alloying elements is associated with variations in the magnetic
properties of phases, it can be studied indirectly by magnetic-based methods. To do this,
one needs to know how the magnetic properties of ferromagnetic phases present in the
microstructure of steels (ferrite, certain carbides and nitrides) are influenced by the
redistribution of alloying elements.
Phase 1
(Ferromagnetic)
Phase 2
(Ferromagnetic /
Paramagnetic)
Elemental
redistributionConsequences of
elemental redistribution
Changes in magnetic properties
and magnetization response of
ferromagnetic phase(s)
Example of magnetic properties
influenced by the chemical
composition are Curie
temperature, saturation
magnetization, magnetic
susceptibility, and magnetic
permeability.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
8
Magnetic Properties: Dia- and Para-MagnetismD
iam
ag
neti
sm
Pa
ram
ag
neti
sm
In the absence of an external field, no dipoles exist in a diamagnetic material; in the
presence of a field, dipoles are induced that are aligned opposite to the field direction.
Examples are water, wood, copper, mercury, gold, graphite, and bismuth.
In the absence of an external magnetic field, the orientation of atomic magnetic moments in a
paramagnetic material is random and there is no net macroscopic magnetization. These
atomic dipoles are free to rotate, and paramagnetism results when they preferentially align
with an external field. Examples are magnesium, aluminum, molybdenum, lithium, and
tantalum.
Weakly repelled by magnetic fields
Weakly attracted to magnetic fields
William D. Callister. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
9
Magnetic Properties: Ferromagnetism
Certain metallic materials possess a permanent magnetic moment in the absence
of an external field, and manifest very large and permanent magnetizations. These
are the characteristics of ferromagnetism, and they are displayed by the
transition metals iron, cobalt, nickel, and some of the rare earth metals such as
gadolinium (Gd). Ferromagnets are noticeably attracted to magnetic fields.
Schematic illustration of the
mutual alignment of atomic
dipoles for a ferromagnetic
material, which will persist
even in the absence of an
external magnetic field.
Plot of saturation magnetization as a
function of temperature for iron and
Fe3O4.
TC
for p
ure
Fe
William D. Callister. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
10
Magnetic Domains
Gradual change in magnetic dipole
orientation across a domain wall
Domains in a ferromagnetic material; arrows
represent atomic magnetic dipoles. Within each
domain, all dipoles are aligned, whereas the
direction of alignment varies from one domain to
another. The net macroscopic magnetization is
the average of all domains.
William D. Callister. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
11
Magnetization Process
Domain configuration during several stages of magnetization of a ferromagnetic
material.
Growth of domains that are oriented in directions nearly parallel to applied magnetic field (H)
Domain rotation and alignment with the direction of applied magnetic field (H)
William D. Callister. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
12
Magnetization Cycle and Hysteresis
The hysteresis loop is represented by the solid red curve; the dashed blue curve indicates
the initial magnetization. The area within a loop represents the magnetic energy loss per
unit volume of material per magnetization-demagnetization cycle; this energy loss is
manifested as heat that is generated within the magnetic specimen and is capable of
raising its temperature.
Remanence, Br
Coercive force, Hc
Soft magnet
(easily
magnetized-
demagnetized)Hard magnet
(high resistance to
demagnetization)William D. Callister. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
13
Magnetic (Magnetocrystalline) Anisotropy
111
100
110
<100>, easy magnetization direction
Iron
Nickel
<110>
<111>
Anisotropy of magnetization behavior in Fe and Ni single crystals with
their <100>, <110>, and <111> crystallographic axes parallel to the
external magnetic field (H) direction.
easy
magnetization
direction
William D. Callister. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
14J. Crangle, G.M. Goodman, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Math. Phys. Sci. 321 (1971) 477–491.
(Saturation) Magnetization of Iron
Authors (year) at 293 K at 77 K at 0 or 4 K
Magnetic isothermals
for pure iron at
temperatures near
Curie temperature
indicating gradual
demagnetization of
iron
217.61
217.35
-
217.6
-
-
-
221.4
221.74
-
221.71
221.7
Weiss & Forrer (1929)
Danan (1958)
Danan, Herr & Meyer (1968)
Crangle & Goodman (1971)
Magnetization (), emu/g
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
15H. Yamauchi, H. Watanabe, Y. Suzuki, H. Saito, Magnetization of α-Phase Fe-Mn Alloys, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 36 (1974) 971–974.
Magnetization of Fe-Mn Alloys
Magnetization curves for Fe-Mn
alloys at 4.2 K
Temperature-dependent
magnetization of Fe-Mn alloys at
the magnetic field of 6.05 kOe
159 K100 K
Reduced m
agnetiza
tion
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
16
Magnetization of Fe-Mn Alloys
H. Yamauchi, H. Watanabe, Y. Suzuki, H. Saito, Magnetization of α-Phase Fe-Mn Alloys, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 36 (1974) 971–974.
Magnetization change as a function of Mn content.
Simple dilution (magnetic
moment of Mnatoms assumed to
be zero).
Simple dilution
ε-phase?ε-phase?
For dilute Fe-Mn steels: (emu/g) 𝜎𝐹𝑒−𝑀𝑛 = 𝜎𝐹𝑒 − 1.18 × 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠%𝑀𝑛
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
17T.D. Yensen, J. Frankl. Inst. 199 (1925) 333–342.D.I. Bardos, J.L. Beeby, A.T. Aldred, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 878–881.
Magnetization of Fe-Ni Alloys
BCC range FCC range
0 5 10 15 20 25200
205
210
215
220
225
230
Extr
ap
ola
ted
ma
gn
etiza
tio
n a
t 0
K (
em
u/g
)
Ni content (at.%)
BCC range
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
18A.T. Aldred, Phys. Rev. B 14 (1976) 219–227.
Magnetization of Fe-Cr Alloys
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7040
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
Extr
ap
ola
ted
ma
gn
etiza
tion
at
0K
(e
mu
/g)
Cr content (at.%)
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
19A.T. Aldred, J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1 (1968) 244.
Magnetization of Fe-Mo Alloys
0 5 10
180
200
220
Extr
ap
ola
ted
ma
gn
etiza
tion
at
0K
(e
mu
/g)
Mo content (at.%)
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
20D. Parsons, W. Sucksmith, J.E. Thompson, Philos. Mag. 3 (1958) 1174–1184.
Magnetization of Fe-Mo Alloys
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
21
Approximate Magnetization of Fe-X Binary Alloys
If the influence of alloying elements on the magnetization of ferrite/martensite is
known, magnetic measurements can be used for phase quantification in steels
with duplex (σ+γ) microstructures.
Linear approximation of the effect of alloying elements on the
magnetic moment (Bohr magneton per atom) of iron.
W. Pepperhoff, M. Acet, Constitution and Magnetism of Iron and Its Alloys, 1st ed., Springer, 2001.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
22
𝜎 =
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝜎𝑖𝑓𝑖
𝒇𝜸 = 𝟏 −𝝈𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅
𝝈𝜶
Rule of mixtures applied to ferritic-austenitic steels (similarly martensitic steels with
retained austenite):
𝝈𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅 = 𝝈𝜶 × 𝒇𝜶 + 𝝈𝜸 × 𝒇𝜸
In order to determine the fraction of phases, the magnetization of ferrite/martensite
(𝝈𝜶) must be known. The magnetization of ferrite (martensite) depends on
temperature, magnetic field intensity, and chemical composition.
Phase Quantification by Magnetic Measurements
Magnetization of multiphase mixtures:
Due to the paramagnetism of austenite, 𝝈𝜸 can be set to zero, therefore:
Austenite fraction:
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
23
Linear factors for the influence of Mn, Cr, Ni, Si, and Mo in small quantities
on the magnetization of binary low-alloy Fe-X steels (X: alloying element).
𝜎𝐹𝑒−𝑋 = 𝜎𝐹𝑒 + 𝑓𝑋 ×𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠%𝑋
J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Tempering of Martensite and Subsequent Redistribution of Cr, Mn, Ni, Mo, and Si Between Cementite and Martensite Studied by Magnetic Measurements
Alloying element (X) Coefficient fX, emu/g
per 1 mass-%X
Cr -2.12
Mn -1.18
Si -2.00
Ni +0.45
Mo -1.98
Magnetization of Binary Low-Alloy Steels
Ma
gn
etiza
tio
n, 𝜎𝐹𝑒−𝑋
Mass-% XFe
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
24
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.60
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Water + liquid nitrogen -196 oC
Water + ethanol -100 oC
Water + ethanol -50 oC
Water 0 oC
Water 20 oC
Water 60 oC_10min
Water 80 oC_1min
Water 80 oC_10min
Oil 150 oC_1min
Oil 150 oC_10min
Ma
rte
nsite
fra
ctio
n,
vo
l.%
Carbon concentration, mass-%
Quenching conditions after austenitization
Fe-1.5Mn-1.46C
Martensite fractions in quenched Fe-1.5Mn-xC steels determined by magnetic
measurements at RT under a field of nearly 4 kOe (𝜎𝑅𝑇,𝐹𝑒,4𝑘𝑂𝑒 = 213.5 emu/g)
Martensite/RA in Hardened Fe-1.5Mn-xC Steels
M. Ren, Diplomarbeit, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 2017.
𝝈𝜶(𝑭𝒆−𝟏.𝟓𝑴𝒏) = 𝟐𝟏𝟏. 𝟕 𝒆𝒎𝒖/𝒈
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
25
Alloy ID C Cr Mn Si Ni Mo FeσRT ,
emu/g
σRT,αʹ ,
emu/gfγ,
vol.%
2Cr 0.68 2.10 - - - - Bal. 198.5 209.0 5.0
2Mn 0.70 - 2.37 - - - Bal. 198.0 210.7 6.0
2Si 0.69 - - 2.00 - - Bal. 198.0 209.5 5.5
2Ni 0.71 - - - 2.04 - Bal. 204.2 214.4 4.8
2Mo 0.71 - - - - 1.95 Bal. 198.4 209.6 5.4
Measured room temperature magnetizations (σRT) and retained austenite
contents in hardened ternary steels calculated based on magnetization of the
martensitic constituent (σRT,αʹ)
J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 5805–5812.
Martensite/RA in Hardened Steels
Hardening treatment: quenching from 1000 °C in a brine+ice mixture
followed by immediate transfer to a tank of liquid nitrogen at -196 °C.
𝒇𝜸 = 𝟏 −𝝈𝑹𝑻 (𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅)
𝝈𝑹𝑻,𝜶′Austenite fraction:
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
26L.J.E. Hofer, Nature of the Carbides of Iron, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1966.
Magnetic Properties of Carbides of Iron
Curie temperatures
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
27T. Shigematsu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 37 (1974) 940–945.A. Kagawa, T. Okamoto, Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 20 (1979) 659–666.
Magnetic Properties of Impure Cementite
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
28B.A. Apaev, Magnetic phase analysis of alloys, Moscow Steel, Moscow, 1976.
Thermomagnetic Measurements
In thermomagnetic measurements, magnetization is measured during
continuous heating.
Ce
me
ntite
fra
ctio
n, % 12
10
8
6
4
2
0
14
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
%C
1
2
3
45
6
6
5
4
3
2
1
Thermomagnetic measurements
for steels with various cementite
fractions.
Curie
temperature of
Fe3C
Incre
ased
Fe
3 C fra
ctio
n
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
29V.G. Gavriljuk, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 345 (2003) 81–89.
Thermomagnetic Measurements
Thermomagnetic curves for pearlitic Fe-0.7C
steels cold rolled by 80%
Fine pearlite Coarse pearlite Advantage:
The method can be used
to determine Curie
temperature.
Disadvantage:
Quantitative analysis of
results requires that the
temperature dependence
of magnetization for
phases is known.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
30
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
Time
Tem
pera
ture
Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle n-1 Cycle n
Prior heating temperature
Ma
gn
eti
zati
on
at
RT
T1
T2
Tn-1
Tn
: Measurement
points (at RT)
T1 T2 TnTn-1
Reference
value
(before
heating)
In contrast to
thermomagnetic
measurements
where
magnetization is
measured
continuously as
the temperature
is varied,
magnetic
measurements
could be
performed at a
constant
temperature (for
instance room
temperature)
after exposure
to various
temperatures.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
31J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 5805–5812.
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
Magnetic measurements at room
temperature after exposure to various
temperatures
Advantage: Quantitative analysis of results
does not require the knowledge of the
temperature dependence of magnetization for
phases.
Disadvantage: The method cannot be used to
determine Curie temperature.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
194
196
198
200
202
Mas
s m
ag
neti
zati
on
, em
u/g
Temperature, oC
III
III
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15 +0.2 oC/s
Ap
pre
nt
CT
E,
10
-4 o
C-1
Temperature, oC
III
I
II
Dilatometry
Magnetic
measurements at RT
As-quenched Fe-2Mn-0.7C steel
I: transition carbides/C segregation to
defects
II: decomposition of retained austenite
III: cementite formation
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
32J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 5805–5812.
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
194
196
198
200
202
Ma
ss
ma
gn
eti
za
tio
n,
em
u/g
Temperature, oC
III
III
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
194
196
198
200
202
Ma
ss
ma
gn
eti
za
tio
n,
em
u/g
Temperature, oC
As-quenched Fe-2Mn-0.7C and Fe-2Cr-0.7C steels
I: transition carbides/C
segregation to defects
II: decomposition of retained
austenite
III: cementite formation
IV: ?
2Mn
2Cr
IV
IV
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
33J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 5805–5812.
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
2 4 6 8 10 12
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
Cr in cementite, mass-%
Cr
in m
art
en
sit
e, m
ass
-%
0
40
80
120
190
195
200
208
210
212
RT,
RT
RT,'
Mag
neti
zati
on
, em
u/g
Cr in '
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
34J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 5805–5812.
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
194
196
198
200
202
Ma
ss
ma
gn
eti
za
tio
n,
em
u/g
Temperature, oC
As-quenched Fe-2Cr-0.7C steel
IV: Cr partitioning into
cementite and gradual
demagnetization of
cementite
θαʹ
R.A.E.
αʹθαʹ: martensite
θ: cementite
IV
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
35J. Mola, G. Luan, D. Brochnow, O. Volkova, J. Wu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48 (2017) 5805–5812.
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
196
198
200
202
204 2Si
Mas
s m
ag
neti
zati
on
at
RT
, em
u/g
Temperature, oC
IIII
II
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700200
202
204
206
208
210
2Ni
Ma
ss
ma
gn
eti
za
tio
n a
t R
T,
em
u/g
Temperature, oC
III
I
II
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
196
198
200
202
204 2Mo
Ma
ss
ma
gn
eti
za
tio
n a
t R
T,
em
u/g
Temperature, oC
III
I
II
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
III2Si
III
I
+0.2 oC/s Curves are
displaced
vertically
for clarity
2Ni
2Mo
2Cr
2Si
2Mn
CT
Ea, 1
0-4 o
C-1
Temperature, oC
As-quenched Fe-2X-0.7C steels
Delayed decomposition
of retained
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
36
100 200 300 400 500 600
0.985
0.990
0.995
1.000
X45Cr13
Re
lati
ve C
ha
ng
e in
Mag
ne
tizati
on
Temperature, oC
X31Cr13
100 200 300 400 500 6000.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
X45Cr13
X31Cr13
Insta
nta
ne
ou
s C
TE
, 1
x 1
0-4 o
C-1
Temperature, oC
+20 oC/s
Temper stage IIITemper stage I
1: Decrease in magnetization due to
the formation of paramagnetic
cementite (cementite containing
13%Cr)
2: Unexplained mechanism, possibly
reduction in the solute Cr content of
the martensitic matrix
Magnetic Measurements at Room Temperature
1 2
As-quenched stainless steels
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
37
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Dila
tom
ete
r in
du
cto
r p
ow
er,
%
Temperature, oC
Curie Temperature of Iron
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
L
/L0,
m/c
m
Temperature, oC
Tc
A3
TcFe
Paramagnetic
Fe
Ferromagnetic
Fe
The paramagnetic α is more difficult to heat inductively than ferromagnetic
α. Therefore, the power of the high-frequency generator shows an abrupt
increase at the Curie temperature.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
38
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
20
40
60
80
100
Dila
tom
ete
r in
du
cto
r p
ow
er,
%
Temperature, oC
Curie Temperature Shift with Alloying Elements
TcFe-18Cr Tc
Fe
Fe-18Cr
Fe
18%
Cr
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
39S. Arajs, Phys. Status Solidi B 11 (1965) 121–126.
Effect of Alloying Elements on Tc of Iron
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
40D. Parsons, W. Sucksmith, J.E. Thompson, Philos. Mag. 3 (1958) 1174–1184.
Effect of Alloying Elements on Tc of Iron
Al effect Si effect
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
41
5 µm
2 µm
0.5 µm
γαʹ
γ + αʹ
As cold-rolled, 43 vol.% αʹ
RD
TD
Austenitic high Mn Fe−18Mn−2Al−2Si−0.04C steel after 80% cold-
rolling reduction at RT to induce nearly 43 vol.%αʹ
Partitioning of Mn between αʹ and
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
42
Partitioning of Mn between αʹ and
200 300 400 500 600 700 800
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26' reversion to
Tc
CT
Ea, 1
0-4 o
C-1
Temperature, oC
50 °C/s
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
10
20
30
40
50
60
Ind
uc
tor
po
we
r, %
Temperature, oC
Tc
20 550 600 650 700 750 800 850
Temperature, oC
10
20
30
40
Cooling rate: 50 oC/s
Holding time: 0 s
f ', v
ol.%
As c
old
-rolle
d
Heating rate: 50 oC/s
(475 °C)
(475 °C)
Chemical composition of
deformation-induced
martensite is the same as
the nominal composition,
namely it is
Fe−18Mn−2Al−2Si−0.04C
Curie temperature
corresponds to the
cold-rolled
condition (no
partitioning of
alloying elements)
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
43
Partitioning of Mn between αʹ and
450 500 550 600
20
40
60
80
50 °C/s
Tprior
,
oC
Ind
uc
tor
po
we
r, %
Temperature, oC
1 N/A
2 540
3 560
4 580
5 600
6 620
8 660
10 700
12 740
13 760
14 780
Cycle
no.
Change in the Tc of martensite
after each heating cycle,
indicating the partitioning of
alloying elements between
martensite and austenite
Time
Tem
pera
ture
Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 13 Cycle 14
560 C
800 C
720 C680 C640 C600 C
760 C780 C
540 C
740 C700 C660 C620 C580 C
Flash heating cycles
500 550 600 650 700 750460
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
Heating rate: 50 oC/s
(flash heating)
Heating rate: 1 oC/s
Tc,
oC
Prior heating temperature, oC
Cycle 1 (as cold-rolled)
1 h 540 oC
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Cycle no.
(cold-rolled, 475 °C)
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
44
Partitioning of Mn between αʹ and
500 550 600 650 700 750460
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
Heating rate: 50 oC/s
(flash heating)
Heating rate: 1 oC/s
Tc,
oC
Prior heating temperature, oC
Cycle 1 (as cold-rolled)
1 h 540 oC
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Cycle no.
500 550 600 650 700 7504
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 h 540 oC
Heating rate: 50 oC/s
(flash heating)
Heating rate: 1 oC/s
Estimated
from Tc
Nominal (as cold-rolled)
Mn
co
ncen
trati
on
in
', m
as
s-%
Temperature (°C)
Equilibrium
(Thermo-Calc)
Slower heating (1 °C/s) or isothermal holding at low temperatures (1 h 540
°C) leads to a more pronounced partitioning of Mn.
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
45
Partitioning of Mn between αʹ and
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
'
Si
Al
Mn
co
nc
en
tra
tio
n,
ma
ss
-%
Distance, nm
Mn
γγ
αʹ
γ
αʹ
1 µm
Cold-rolled, heated to 650 °C at 50 °C/s, and
immediately cooled to RT at 50 °C/s
Confirmation of
the partitioning
of Mn between
martensite and
austenite by
TEM-EDS
analysis
Sp
ezie
lle
Sta
hle
igen
sch
aft
en
WS
2017/1
8
46