39
1 COMP 546 Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues. April 3, 2018

Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

1

COMP 546

Lecture 21

Cochlea to brain,Source Localization

Tues. April 3, 2018

Page 2: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Ear

2

auditory canal

pinna

cochlea

outer middle inner

Page 3: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

3

Eye

β€’ Lens

β€’ Retina

β€’ Photoreceptors

(light -> chemical)

β€’ Ganglion cells (spikes)

β€’ Optic nerve

Ear

β€’ ?

β€’ ?

β€’ ?

β€’ ?

β€’ ?

Page 4: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

4

Eye

β€’ Lens

β€’ Retina

β€’ Photoreceptors

(light -> chemical)

β€’ Ganglion cells (spikes)

β€’ Optic nerve

Ear

β€’ Outer ear

β€’ Cochlea

β€’ hair cells

(mechanical -> chemical)

β€’ Ganglion cells (spikes)

β€’ VestibuloCochlear nerve

Page 5: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Basilar Membrane

5

BM fibres have bandpass frequency mechanical responses.

20,000 Hz20 Hz

Page 6: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Basilar Membrane: Place code (β€œtonotopic”)

6

Nerve cells (hair + ganglion) are distributed along the BM. They have similar bandpass frequency response functions.

20,000 Hz20 Hz

Page 7: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

7

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 …. 22,000

Bandpass responses (more details next lecture)

Page 8: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Neural coding of sound in cochlea

β€’ Basilar membrane responds by vibrating with sound.

β€’ Hair cells at each BM location release neurotransmitter that signal BM amplitude at that location

β€’ Ganglion cells respond to neurotransmitter signals by spiking

8

Page 9: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

9

Louder sound within frequency band

β†’ greater amplitude of BM vibration at that location

β†’ greater release of neurotransmitter by hair cell

β†’ greater probability of spike at each peak of filtered wave

Page 10: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

10

Hair cell neurotransmitter release can signal exact timingof BM amplitude peaks for frequencies up to ~2 kHz.

For higher frequencies, hair cells encode only the envelope of BM vibrations.

t

Page 11: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Timing of ganglion cell spikes:for frequencies up to 2 KHz (β€œphase locking”)

11

Hair cells release more neurotransmitter at BM amplitude peaks.

Ganglion cells respond to neurotransmitter peaks by spiking.

This allows exact timing of BM vibrations to be encoded by spikes.

BM vibration

Spikes

Page 12: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

12

3,000 hair cellsin each cochlea(left and right)

30,00 ganglion cells in each cochlea

cochlear nerve(to brain)

Ganglion cells cannot spike faster than 500 times per second.So we need many ganglion cells for each hair cell.

Page 13: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

β€œVolley” code

13

Different ganglion cells at same spatial position on BM

Page 14: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

14

From cochlea to brain stem

cochlea β†’ cochlear nucleus β†’ lateral and medial superior olive (LSO, MSO)… β†’ auditory cortex

BRAIN STEM

Page 15: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Tonotopic maps

15

cochlear nucleus (CN)

cochlea

lateral superior

olive (LSO)

medial superior

olive (MSO)

auditory nerve

high πœ” low πœ”

Page 16: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Binaural Hearing

16

CN

LSO MSO

high πœ” low πœ”

CN

MSO LSO

low πœ” high πœ”

Page 17: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Binaural Hearing

17

CN

LSO MSO

high πœ”low πœ”

CN

MSO LSO

low πœ”high πœ”

MSO combines low frequency signals.

Page 18: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Binaural Hearing

18

CN

LSO MSO

high πœ”

CN

MSO LSO

high πœ”

LSO combines high frequency signals.

Page 19: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Levels of Analysis

19

- what is the task ? what problem is being solved?

- brain areas and pathways

- neural coding

- neural mechanisms

high

low

Page 20: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

20

For high frequency bands, β€’ the head casts a shadowβ€’ the timing of the peaks cannot be accurately coded

by the spikes (only the rate of spikes is informative)

For low frequency bands,β€’ the head casts a weak shadow onlyβ€’ the timing of the peaks can be encoded by spikes

Page 21: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Duplex theory of binaural hearing(Rayleigh, 1907)

β€’ level differences computed for higher frequencies (ILD -- interaural level differences)

β€’ timing differences computed for lower frequencies (ITD - interaural timing differences)

21

Page 22: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

22

CN

LSO MSO

high πœ”

CN

MSO LSO

high πœ”

Level differences (high frequencies)

βˆ’ βˆ’+ +

Excitatory input comes from the ear on the same side. Inhibitory input comes from ear on the opposite side.

Page 23: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

23

CN

LSO MSO

high πœ”low πœ”

CN

MSO LSO

low πœ”high πœ”

Timing differences (low frequencies)

Sum excitatory input from both sides. Reminiscent of binocular complex cells in V1 ?

++

++

Page 24: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Jeffress Model (1948) for timing differences

24

http://auditoryneuroscience.com/topics/jeffress-model-animation

E D C B A from right earfrom left ear

A

B

C

D

E

Page 25: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Spike Timing precision required for Jeffress Model ?

25

from right earfrom left ear

distance = 1

10π‘šπ‘–π‘™π‘™π‘–π‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ 

speed of spike = 10 π‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘  π‘ π‘’π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘βˆ’1

⟹ βˆ† time =π‘‘π‘–π‘ π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’

𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑=

1

100π‘šπ‘–π‘™π‘™π‘–π‘ π‘’π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘‘

See Exercises 19 Q2c

E D C B A

Page 26: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

26

Jeffress model remains controversial. It is not known exactly how β€œcoincidence detection” occurs in MSO.

πœ”

Coincidence detection for each low

frequency band

A B C D E

A B C D E

A B C D E

A B C D E

Page 27: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

NaΓ―ve Computational Model of Source Localization(Recall lecture 20)

27

𝐼𝑙 (𝑑) = 𝛼 πΌπ‘Ÿ(𝑑 βˆ’ 𝜏) + πœ–(𝑑)

shadow model error

delay

Find the 𝛼 and 𝜏 that minimize

where 𝜏 < 0.5 π‘šπ‘ .

𝑑=1

𝑇

{ 𝐼𝑙 (𝑑) βˆ’ 𝛼 πΌπ‘Ÿ(𝑑 βˆ’ 𝜏) }2

Page 28: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

28

10 π‘™π‘œπ‘”10

𝑑=1𝑇 𝐼𝑙 (𝑑)2

𝑑=1𝑇 πΌπ‘Ÿ (𝑑)2

𝑑

𝐼𝑙 (𝑑) πΌπ‘Ÿ(𝑑 βˆ’ 𝜏) .

Timing difference: find the 𝜏 that maximizes

Level difference:

Page 29: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

29

𝑑

𝐼𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑗(𝑑) πΌπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘

𝑗(𝑑 βˆ’ 𝜏) .

For each low frequency band 𝑗, find the 𝜏 that maximizes

(or use summation model similar to binocular cells or Jeffress model)

An estimated value of delay 𝜏 in frequency band j is consistent with various possible source directions ( πœ™, ΞΈ ).

Similar to cone of confusion, but more general because of frequency dependence

Page 30: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

30

𝐼𝐿𝐷𝑗 = 10 π‘™π‘œπ‘”10

𝑑=1𝑇 𝐼𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑

𝑗 (𝑑)2

𝑑=1𝑇 πΌπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘

𝑗 (𝑑)2

For each high frequency band 𝑗, compute interaural level difference (ILD) :

What does each 𝐼𝐿𝐷𝑗 tell us ?

Page 31: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

31

𝐼𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑗

𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 𝑑 βˆ— β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘(𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ) βˆ— πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ 𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ

πΌπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘—

𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 𝑑 βˆ— β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘(𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ) βˆ— πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ 𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ

Recall head related impulse response function (HRIR) from last lecture..

If the source direction is (q, f), and 𝑔𝑗 𝑑 is the filter for band 𝑗.

then…

Page 32: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

32

𝐼 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑗

πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 πœ” β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ

𝐼 π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘—

πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 πœ” β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ

Take the Fourier transform and apply convolution theorem :

Page 33: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

33

𝐼 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑗

πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 πœ” β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ

𝐼 π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘—

πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 πœ” β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ

Take the Fourier transform and apply convolution theorem :

If there is just one source direction (πœ™, πœƒ), then for each frequency πœ” within band 𝑗 ∢

𝐼 π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘—

πœ”

𝐼 𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑𝑗

πœ” β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ)

β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ)β‰ˆ

Page 34: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

34

One can show using Parseval’s theorem of Fourier transforms that if β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) and β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) are approximately constant

within band 𝑗, then:

𝑑=1𝑇 𝐼𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑

𝑗 (𝑑)2

𝑑=1𝑇 πΌπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘

𝑗 (𝑑)2

| β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘π‘—

( πœ™, πœƒ) |2

| β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘—

( πœ™, πœƒ) |2β‰ˆ

Page 35: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

35

𝑑=1𝑇 𝐼𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑑

𝑗 (𝑑)2

𝑑=1𝑇 πΌπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘

𝑗 (𝑑)2

| β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘π‘—

( πœ™, πœƒ) |2

| β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘π‘—

( πœ™, πœƒ) |2β‰ˆ

The ear can measure this… and can infer source directions ( πœ™, πœƒ) that are consistent with it.

One can show using Parseval’s theorem of Fourier transforms that if β„Žπ‘™π‘’π‘“π‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) and β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘”β„Žπ‘‘(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) are approximately constant

within band 𝑗, then:

Page 36: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

36

https://auditoryneuroscience.com/topics/acoustic-cues-sound-location

Each iso-contour in each frequency band is consistent with a measured level difference (dB).

Interaural Level Difference (dB) as a function of (πœ™, πœƒ) for two fixed Ο‰.

700 Hz 11,000 Hz

Page 37: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Monaural spectral cues(Spatial localization with one ear?)

37

𝐼𝑗 𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 𝑑 βˆ— β„Ž(𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ) βˆ— πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ 𝑑; πœ™, πœƒ

𝐼𝑗 πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 πœ” β„Žπ‘—(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ

If the source is noise, then all frequencies make the same contribution on average.

Pattern of peaks and notches across bands will be due to HRTF, not to the source.

Page 38: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

38

HRTF from last lecture

e.g. medial plane

Azimuth πœƒ = 0

β€œPinnal notch” frequency varies with elevation of source e.g. in the medial plane.

𝐼𝑗 πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ = 𝑔𝑗 πœ” β„Žπ‘—(πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ) πΌπ‘ π‘Ÿπ‘ πœ”; πœ™, πœƒ

00

Page 39: Lecture 21 Cochlea to brain, Source Localization Tues

Levels of Analysis

39

- what is the task ? what problem is being solved?Source localization using level and timingdifferences within frequency channels.

- brain areas and pathways(cochlea to CN to MSO and LSO in the brainstem)

- neural coding(gave sketch only)

- neural mechanisms

high

low