Upload
votuyen
View
222
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
1
Approaching Childhood
ConstipationpAnees Siddiqui, MD
Pediatric Gastroenterology
‘Specially for ChildrenDell Children’s Medical Center of Central Texas
Disclosure
Anees Siddiqui, MD, has no relationships with commercial companies to disclose.
Learning ObjectivesAt the end of this presentation the participant will be able to:
1. Institute an appropriate workup to differentiate functional constipation anddifferentiate functional constipation and other organic etiologies of disease
2. Understand the appropriate management options for pediatric constipation
3. Have a sense as to when referral to subspecialty care is appropriate.
Epidemiology
• Prevalence estimated up to between 0.7 to 29.6%
• Independent of age, sex, race, geography, and socioeconomic status
Epidemiology
• 3% of all visits to pediatricians
• 25% of all visits to pediatric GI
• Estimated burden to health care system of $3.9 billion / year
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
2
Case I (M L )Case I (M.L.)
Case I (M.L.)• 2 yo with constipation since infancy
• Worsened when began walking
• N i i d il l t h• Now requiring daily ex-lax to have a weekly bowel movement
• Demonstrates witholding behavior
• Social History: Mom recollects holding the child down to force her to have a BM
Case I (M.L.)
• Started on a laxative cleanout regimen followed by maintenance
• Enforced Non-Punative
• Seen in clinic for 1 month follow up
• Complete Resolution of Symptoms
Case 2 (L R )Case 2 (L.R.)
Case 2 (L.R.)• CC: constipation not responding to medical
therapy
• HPI
• 4 yo girl with constipation since infancy
• Never toilet trained
• BM every other week
• Now with severe abdominal distension
• ROS: FTT
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
3
Physical Examination
• General: thin NAD, distressed on examination
• Lungs: CTA B
• CV: RRR no murmer
• Abdomen: significant distension, tympanic, no masses, no HS megaly
Labs
• Normal CBC
• Normal LFTs
• Normal Chem 20
• Neg celiac, Neg thyroid, Neg Sweat
Meds
• Mirilax 17gm BID for several months
• Dulcolax 5mg BID for several weeks
• Senna 2 tsp BID for several months
• Mineral oil 1 tsp BID for several weeks
Work up• Due to severity of symptoms child is
admitted for further work up and management
• Barium enema• Barium enema
• Anorectal manometry
• Colonic monometry
• Rectal biopsy
• Lumbar MRI
Barium Enema
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
4
Agenda
• Definitions
• Physiology / PathogenesisPhysiology / Pathogenesis
• Differential Diagnosis
• Workup
• Management
DefinitionsDefinitions
Definitions
• Constipation has multiple interpretations
• Variability of “Normal”
• 12,984 children’s parents completed questionnaires at 1, 6, 18, 30, 42 months
Paris Concensus on Childhood Constipation Teriminology
(PACCT) Group• 2 or more of the following for ≥8 weeks
• <3 bowel movement per week
• ≥1 fecal incontinence per week≥1 fecal incontinence per week
• Large stool on rectal or abdominal exam
• Stool that clogs the toilet
• Retentive Posturing or Withholding
• Painful Defecation
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
5
PhysiologyPhysiology
Physiology
• Mechanisms of Continence
• P b t li• Puborectalis
• Internal Anal Sphincter
• External Anal Sphincter
• Anorectal Angle
Physiology
• Stool Descends to Rectum
• Passive Relaxation ofPassive Relaxation of IAS
• Stool Contacts Anal Canal
• EAS Contracts
Physiology
• OK to Poop?
• Puborectalis Relaxes
• Pelvic Floor Descends
• Anorectal Angle Straightens
• Success!!
Physiology
• Shouldn’t Poop?
• EAS and Puborectalis Contract
• Anorectal Angle Lessens
• Maintain Continence!!
Pathophysiology• Summary of Components of Defecation
• Bolus Delivery
• Bolus SensationBolus Sensation
• Pelvic Floor Reaction
• Intra Abdominal Forces
• Disruption in the above causes constipation
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
6
Differential DiagnosisDifferential Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•• Imperforate Anus
• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Anteriorly Displaced Anus
• Anal Stenosis
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•
• Hypothyroidism
• Hypocalcemia
• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Hypokalemia
• Cystic Fibrosis
• Diabetes Mellitus
• Celiac Disease
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•• Spina Bifida
• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Spinal Cord Trauma
• Tethered Cord
• Encephalopathy
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•
• Hirshsprung’s
• Non-Relaxing IAS• Enteric Neuropathy /
Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Neuroectodermal Dysplasia
• Viceral Myopathy
• Viceral Neuropathy
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
7
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Prune Belly Syndrome
• Gastroschisis
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•• Scleroderma
• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• SLE
• Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•
• Opiates
• Anticholinergics• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Anticholinergics
• Sympathomimetics
• Anti-Depressants (TCAs)
Differential Diagnosis• Anatomic
• Metabolic
• Neuropathic
•
• Lead Intoxication
• Vitamin D Intoxication• Enteric Neuropathy / Myopathy
• Abdominal Musculature
• Connective Tissue Disorder
• Drugs
• Other
• Vitamin D Intoxication
• Cow’s Milk Protein Intolerance
• Botulism
Differential Diagnosis
• Functional
• Celiac
• Hypothyroidism
• Calcium Derangement
• Milk Protein Intolerance
• Hirshsprung’s
Differential Diagnosis (Non Organic)
• Developmental
• Situational
• Depression
• Reduced Stool Volume
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
8
Pathogenesis
• Some stimulus causes withholding
• Stool becomes progressively harder
• Child is more reluctant to defecate
• Colonic distension weakens peristalsis
• Constipation cycle
• Often overflow incontinence results
WorkupWorkup
Workup
• History
• Physical
History• Age of Onset
• Passage of Meconium
• Nausea / Vomiting
• Toilet Training
• Abdominal Distension
• Abdominal Pain
• Doodie Dance
• Fecal Incontinence
• Course Hair
• Fatigue
Physical Exam
• General Appearance / Vitals
• Abdomen
• Anal Inspection
• Rectal Examination
• Back Examination
• Neurologic Examination
Additonal Work-up• Imaging
• KUB ??
• Transit Studyy
• MRI of LS Spine
• Barium Enema
• Anorectal Manometry
• Colonic Motility Study
• Lab Tests
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
9
ManagementManagement
Management
• Disimpaction
• Maintenance Therapy
• Behavioral Therapy
• Treat the Underlying Condition
Medications
• Mushers (Osmotic Laxatives)
• Pushers (Stimulant Laxatives)Pushers (Stimulant Laxatives)
• Lubricants
• Rectal
• Other
Medications
• Mushers
• Miralax (PEG)
• 1.5gm/kg/day (disempact)
• 1.0gm/kg/day (maintain)
• Milk of Magnesia (MgOH)• Pushers
• Lubricants
• Rectal
Milk of Magnesia (MgOH)
• 1 - 3cc/kg/day
• Lactulose
• 1 - 3 cc/kg/day
• MgCitrate
• 1 - 3 cc/kg/day (<6yo)
• 100 - 150 cc/day (6-12yo)
• 150 - 300 cc/day (>12yo)
Medications
• Mushers
• Senna (Ex-Lax)
• 6-11yo: 1 square QD - BID
15mg/square
• Pushers
• Lubricants
• Rectal
• >12yo: 2 square QD - BID
• Bisacodyl
• 1-3 tablets/Day (5mg)
• ½-1 suppository/Day (10mg)
Medications
• Mushers • Mineral Oil
•• Pushers
• Lubricants
• Rectal
• 15 - 30cc/yr (max 240cc) daily for disimpaction
• 1 - 3 cc/kg/day maintenance
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
10
Medications
• Mushers• Fleets (Phosphate)
Enema• 6cc/kg up to 135cc• Pushers
• Lubricants
• Rectal
6cc/kg up to 135cc• no kids < 2 years• no more than 1/ day • Mineral Oil Enema• Glycerin Suppository
Disimpaction
• Goal is aggressive clean out
• Dealers Choice ... butDealers Choice ... but
• Miralax 17gm BID x 3 days
• Ex-Lax 1 square qDay x 3 days
• Then on maintenance
Maintenance Therapy
• Goal: 1 - 2 soft stool / day
• Expect 6 - 24 month of therapy
• Focus of Therapy
• Dietary Education
• Behavioral Modification
• Laxatives
Maintenance: Diet
• Fiber Supplementation
•Goal = (age + 5)gm/day
•Dietary: •Whole Grain Breads• Adequate Hydration
• Balanced Nutritious Diet
• ? Milk Elimination ?
•Whole Grain Breads•Cereals•Fruits Vegetables•Supplements•Benefiber•Fiber One•etc
Maintenance: Behavior
• Age Appropriate Toilet Training
• Sitting ScheduleSitting Schedule
• Incremental Rewards
• Stooling Chart
• Avoid Punitive Measures
Weaning
• Gradual tapering of medications tried every 6 monthsevery 6 months
• Stopping meds too soon is the most common cause of relapse
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
11
Outcomes
• Rates of Successful Management Vary
• 50% - 90% success over 1 year
• Close follow up and continuation of meds is crucial
• 401 children with functional constipation (1991 - 1999)
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e156-62. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
• 6 - 8 weeks of intensive treatment
• Follow up at 6 months then yearly
• Standardized Questionnaire
• (Category 1) Good Outcome without Laxatives
Outcome Categories
• (Category 2) Good Outcome with Laxatives
• (Category 3) Poor Outcome without Laxatives
• (Category 4) Poor Outcome with Laxatives
Outcomes by Age
75%
Outcome by Follow-up Duration
Contributors to Poor Outcome
• Delay in ReferralDelay in Referral
• Advanced Age at Onset
• Defecation Frequency
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
12
Take Home Points
• Definitions
• Physiology / Pathogenesis
• Significant Variability in Presentation
• Cycle of Constipation
Agenda
Physiology / Pathogenesis
• Differential Diagnosis
• Workup
• Management
• Main Dx: Functional, Milk Intolerance, Celiac, Hypothyroid, Ca
• History/Physical
• Minimum 6 months of Laxatives
Barium Enema Work up• Due to severity of symptoms child is
admitted for further work up and management
• Barium enema• Barium enema
• Anorectal manometry
• Colonic monometry
• Rectal biopsy
• Lumbar MRI
Work up• Due to severity of symptoms child is
admitted for further work up and management
• Barium enema• Barium enema
• Anorectal manometry
• Colonic monometry
• Rectal biopsy
• Lumbar MRI
Anorectal Manometry
• Balloon Simulates Fecal BolusFecal Bolus
• Attempting to ellicit the RAIR (recto-anal inhibitory reflex)
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
13
Indications• Rule out Hirschsprung’s
• Evaluation of Intractable Constipation
• E l ti f F l I ti• Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence
• Establish candidacy for anorectal biofeedback
• Establish candiacy for anal botox injection
Hirschsprung’s Disease
Normal
HDJPGN 2006
Contrast Enema
Anorectal Manometry
Rectal Suction Biopsy
Contrast Enema
Anorectal Manometry
Rectal Suction Biopsy
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
14
• 27 children who had > 3 biofeedback sessionssessions
• 88.9% success in treating functional constipation due to pelvic floor dysfunction
Coming SoonComing Soon...
Pediatrics Grand Rounds22 November 2013
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
15
References• Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Physician visits in the United States for constipation: 1958 to 1986. Dig
Dis Sci. 1989;34(4):606–611..
• Constipation Guideline Committee of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Evaluation and treatment of constipation in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43(3):e1–13.; ( )
• Steer CD, Emond AM, Golding J, Sandhu B. The variation in stool patterns from 1 to 42 months: a population-based observational study. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2009;94(3):231–233.
• Bongers MEJ, van Wijk MP, Reitsma JB, Benninga MA. Long-Term Prognosis for Childhood Constipation: Clinical Outcomes in Adulthood. PEDIATRICS. 2010;126(1):e156–e162.
• de Lorijn F, Kremer LCM, Reitsma JB, Benninga MA. Diagnostic tests in Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;42(5):496–505.
• Siddiqui A, Rosen R, Nurko S. Anorectal Manometry May Identify Children With Spinal Cord Lesions. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011:1.