Upload
tate-mince
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
LP Traffic Task Force – Who did the real work
Pamela Backman
Irma Baldanza
Sue Belanger
Carole Matthews
Joe Kroon
Fred Theysmeyer
Original team who created the survey
content
Software selection and
data manipulation
Formatted the survey,
distributed to residents,
analyzed the findings,
met with consultants and City
3
LP Traffic Task Force - Objectives & Mandate
Speed, volume, parking and pedestrian safety
Seek big-picture solutions with City/Consultant
Maintain high-level of involvement from residents
Develop plan to address top traffic issues & problem areas
Task force made up of residents across Lawrence Park
Conduct survey to collect resident views, feedback
Initiative co-funded by LPRA and LPBPOA with resident donations
Finalize and present LP traffic plan by early 2009.
• Enbridge pipe renewal to start in 2009
4
LP Traffic Task Force – Gameplan & Timeline
SETUP &LAUNCH
TASKFORCE
RESIDENTSURVEYIN FIELD
ANALYZESURVEY
FINDINGS
TOWNHALL 1:FINDINGS &POSSIBLE
SOLUTIONS
DEVELOPDRAFT
LP-WIDETRAFFIC
PLAN
TOWNHALL 2:CONFIRM
SOLUTIONS,IMPL’N PLAN
SPRING ‘06 Q1 2007 Q4 2007 Q2 2008 Q4 2008 Q2 2009
PHASE 0 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5
CONSULTEXPERTS
CONSULTEXPERTS
SOLICIT VOLUNTEERS & COMMUNICATE PROGRESS
5
LP Traffic Task Force – Survey Approach
Raised $6,800 to fund traffic calming initiative
Survey had 30-40 questions – open ended & specific
Received feedback on concerns and possible solutions
300+ responses from base of 1,500 residents
Analyzed data using Knowledge4You Corp. software ($2,000)
Hired UMA Engineering Ltd. as independent traffic consultants ($3,600)
Task force met with City Traffic Department and Councillor Jenkins (April 4, 2008)
• Reviewed survey findings and proposed solutions• Discussed options and timeline for project planning
7
LP Traffic Survey: Top Issues for Residents
TRAFFICVOLUME
TRAFFICSPEED
PEDESTRIANSAFETY
PARKING/CONSTRUCTION
8
Traffic Volume – Problem Streets (by frequency)
Top Problem Areas for Volume
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Rochester
Yonge
Bayview
Dinnick
Strathgowan
Mount Pleasant
"Cut-through streets"
Dawlish
Blythwood
St. Leonards
Mildenhall
Based on resident responses from Q1 2007 survey, n=300+ to date
1010
Traffic Speed – Problem StreetsBased on response to survey
61%
46%
51%
57%
57%
55%
57%
60%
71%
X % of vehicles speeding per City
11
Intersections Causing Cut-Through Traffic
Left turn onto Lawrence from
Bayview problematic
Traffic is delayed for 90 seconds in each direction, no right
turn on red northbound Mt.
Pleasant
No left turn signal for westbound Lawrence, right hand turn lane
too small for northbound Yonge
Left turn signal no long enough for
northbound Bayview
12
LP Traffic Survey - Pedestrian Safety
66% suggest sidewalks would improve safety
42% suggest curbs would improve safety
Top five streets of concern regarding safety
• Mildenhall (27%)
• Blythwood (19%)
• Mt. Pleasant (11%)
• All streets without sidewalks (9%)
• St. Leonards (8%)
67% feel construction traffic/parking a safety issue
13
LP Traffic Survey - Parking Concerns
Construction workers’ parking (71%)
Large construction vehicles (72%)
Specific Areas
• Blythwood, Ridgefield, Valleyanna @ Bayview (Sunnybrook)
• Glengowan (Blythwood School)
• Cheltenham @ Mildenhall (Glendon College)
• Lympstone at Yonge (Beck’s Taxi)
• St. Edmonds (Subway)
14
Solution Ideas “If you could only do one thing:”
1. Increase police enforcement
2. Sidewalks on Mildenhall
3. Implement Turn Restrictions
4. Implement Speed Humps
5. Address speed issues
6. Install sidewalks everywhere
7. Install more Stop Signs
8. Light at Lawrence & Wanless
9. Limit speed on Mt. Pleasant
10. Stop Signs across Mildenhall
11. Construction vehicle restrictions
Based on resident responses from Q1 2007 survey, n=300+ to date
12. St Leonards/St. Ives Stop Sign
13. Install round-abouts/circles
14. Mt. Pleasant Pedestrian Safety
15. Better curbs at intersections
16. Mt. Pleasant/Lawrence Flow
17. Reduce lanes on Mt. Pleasant
18. Close off Dawlish/St. Leonards @ Bayview
19. Turn Restrictions Dawlish/St. Leonards @ Bayview
20. Fix pot holes/pave streets
The Top 20 Responses (by frequency):
15
Survey: Views on Potential Traffic Solutions
66% in favour of sidewalks
64% want more police enforcement
61% would like more stop signs
53% support rush hour turn restrictions
45% support installation of crosswalks
41% support installation of speed humps
29% support daytime turn restrictions
26% support the use of traffic circles
24% support the use of pinch points
22% support one-way streets
16
Next Steps – Solution Development
City to conduct studies of problem intersections (by priority)
• Mt. Pleasant/Lawrence, Yonge/Lawrence, Blythwood/Bayview Review meeting mid to late June
City to propose potential solutions (need sidewalks)
• Stop signs• Turn restrictions• Speed humps• Pinch points, chicanes• Traffic circles• Road closures
Review draft options
Review proposals with City and Task Force in fall 2008 Town hall to present proposal to residents in early 2009
Engage independent consultant throughout process
Easiest
Most Difficult
17
Next Steps – Solution Development (cont’d)
Task force and Councillor Jenkins to meet with Glendon College regarding land for bus stop adjacent to ramp
• Bayview bridge reconstruction delayed until 2009
Plan to determine availability of land by June 2008
Bike Lanes
• City approved plan for bike lanes in 2001• Ward 25 to bike lanes will be on Lawrence and Mt. Pleasant
Bike Lane Review Meeting to be held April 23, 7:00 pm at Banbury Community Center
Broader Public Hearing – Mid to late May 2008
18
LP Traffic Task Force – Gameplan & Timeline
SETUP &LAUNCH
TASKFORCE
RESIDENTSURVEYIN FIELD
ANALYZESURVEY
FINDINGS
TOWNHALL 1:FINDINGS &POSSIBLE
SOLUTIONS
DEVELOPDRAFT
LP-WIDETRAFFIC
PLAN
TOWNHALL 2:CONFIRM
SOLUTIONS,IMPL’N PLAN
SPRING ‘06 Q1 2007 Q4 2007 Q2 2008 Q4 2008 Q2 2009
PHASE 0 PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5
CONSULTEXPERTS
CONSULTEXPERTS
SOLICIT VOLUNTEERS & COMMUNICATE PROGRESS