Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cristiana Cerrato
Larval ecology of Colias palaeno in the N-W Italian Alps
Turin University - Life Sciences and Systems Biology Department
Future of Butterflies in Europe III – 29-31 March 2012
• 189 extant populations
• 7 became extinct
(time frame ‘before 1950’, 4 ‘unknown’ vs 3 habitat)
• oligotrophic
• acidic soil
• low temperature
• between 1700 – 2300 m
• flight period July-August
Balletto et al. 2007 Peat bogs
Alpine - heaths
Colias palaeno in Italy
Describe the role of biotic and abiotic parameters at a spatial and temporal scale relevant for the caterpillars
Micro-habitat
Micro-climate
Larval host plant condition
Objectives
Survival
Knowledge of the larval needs by target species may be crucial to desing adequate management practice Habitat quality is often defined on the basis of the requirements of the immature stages, because they are more specific than those of the adults This is due to the low or absent mobility as well as the longer life time of the immature stages e.g. Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 149–197
Micro-climate Micro-climatic cooling linked to nitrogen deposition and global warming by advancing plant growth Optimal temperature and humidity level Wallisdevries and van Swaay (2006) Global waming and excess nitrogen may induce butterfly decline by microclimatic cooling – Global Change Biology 12: 1620-1626
Physical characteristics of the larval host plant Bigger leaves and/or bigger plants Linkage to micro-climate Zalucki, Clarke and Malcom (2002) Ecology and behaviour of first instar larvae - Annual Revue of Entomology 47: 361-393
Influencial factors
Throop and Lerdau (2004) – Effects of nitrogen deposition on insect herbivory: Implications for community and ecosystem processes – Ecosystems 7: 109-133 Fisher and Fiedler, (2000): Response of the copper butterfly Lycaena tityrus to increased leaf nitrogen in natural food plants: evidence against the nitrogen limitation Hypothesis – Oecologia 124: 235-241 Stiling and Cornelissen (2007) – How does elevated carbon-dioxide (CO2) affect plant-herbivore interactions? – Global Change Biology 13: 1823-1842
Chemical characteristics of the larval host plant Nitrogen Carbon-based secondary metabolites
Phenological asynchrony Different responses of different trophic levels Insect phenology must ensure the temporal match of larvae and larval resources Monovoltine species have a narrow window of opportunity to exploit resources Singer and Parmesan (2010) Phenological asynchrony between herbivorous insects and their hosts: signal of climate change or pre-existing adaptive strategy? – Phil Trans Royal Society
Influencial factors
• 18 study areas in 2 valleys
Val Formazza and Val Bognanco
• Altitudinal gradient
1600-2300 m a.s.l.
• Dry vs Wet sites
• Sistematically searched for eggs/instars
3 times during the season / 2 hours for visit
Characterized in term of LHP
Random squares 1x1 m (15% minimum coverage by Vaccinium
uliginosum) -Vegetation structure - Height of herbaceous and
shrubs layer - LHP description (height, spring growth, number of
leaves, lenght and widht of the apical leaf)
Where is Colias palaeno in the Alps - Sampling design
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
Density (n / 100 m2)
104 caterpillars in 14 study areas
1. Most sites were occupied (14 vs 4)
2. Low densities
Low altitude and high canopy closure
Where is Colias palaeno the Alps?
dry humid
occupied 4 10
not occupied 3 1
Name: Balma Habitat: Peat bog Altitude: 2000 m Dimension: 1.6 ha Number of pre-immaginal stages: 100
Name: Erioforo Habitat: Humid area Altitude: 2000 m Dimension: 1.2 ha Number of pre-immaginal stages: 90
Larval survival - Study areas
Name: Curzalma Habitat: Alpine heathland Altitude: 2300 m Dimension: 0.3 ha Number of pre-immaginal stages: 80
Name: Arpa Habitat: Alpine heathland Altitude: 1900 m Dimension: 0.5 ha Number of pre-immaginal stages: 170
Larval survival - Study areas
Micro-climate Data-logger Micro-habitat structure
Life-history traits Every 5-7 days Survival classes
Growth rate (length) Feeding rate
Larval Host Plant Spatial and temporal sampling Mid August
Mid September 10 sampling points per site in Italy
N s
pe
cim
ens
Egg
Larval survival - Sampling methods
Mean
±SE
±SD
Outl iersarpa balma curzalma erioforo
Study area
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Poly
phenol conte
nt
Polyphenol: KW-H(3,40) = 11.716, p = 0.008
Lower survival rate:
- Higher level of polyphenols and tannins
- Higher level of secondary metabolites/nitrogen ratio
- No differences in primary metabolisms among sites
Larval survival - Main results
Habitat Altitude Egg - I I - II II - III Total
Heathland 1900 m 58.6 63.9 54.4 20.4
Humid area 2000 m 44.9 63.2 48.6 13.8
Peat Bog 2000 m 55.0 60.0 39.5 13.0
Heathland 2300 m 48.0 45.5 32.0 7.0
Larval survival - Main results
To avoid temporal autocorrelation, we used a
subsample of sampling period (2/8 - 5/10): every 3 days
mesurements (r <0.5)
Mean temperature (°C) - 16 cm
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Media
di t_
arp
a16
Media
di t_
balm
a16
Media
di t_
curz
16
Media
di t_
eri16
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Hea
thla
nd
– 1
90
0 m
Peat
bo
g –
20
00
m
Hea
thla
nd
– 2
30
0 m
Hu
mid
are
a –
23
00
m
Friedman ANOVA test, N = 22, df = 3, χ2 = 53.073, p < 0.0001
Habitat Altitude Egg - I I - II II - III Total
Heathland 1900 m 58.6 63.9 54.4 20.4
Humid area 2000 m 44.9 63.2 48.6 13.8
Peat Bog 2000 m 55.0 60.0 39.5 13.0
Heathland 2300 m 48.0 45.5 32.0 7.0
- Higher survival rate: higher near-ground
temperatures
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Outl iers
0 18
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Litte
r covera
ge (
%)
Dead Survived
Egg - first instar: site and vegetation structure
Parameters Estimate Standard Wald p
Interc 0.516 0.557 0.859 0.354
litter coverage 0.034 0.013 6.598 0.010
shrubs -0.013 0.007 3.910 0.048
Area: heathland (1900 m) 0.636 0.193 10.799 0.001
N dead = 165 N survived = 187
Variable Dead Survived
Litter coverage (%) 11.3 (0.8) 14.2 (0.9)
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Outl iers
0 11.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
Tre
ndP
ol
First - second instar: secondary metabolites
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Outl iers
0 111.0
11.2
11.4
11.6
11.8
12.0
12.2
12.4
12.6
12.8
13.0
13.2
13.4
13.6
13.8
Poly
phenols
(%
) -
Septe
mber
Dead Survived
Dead Survived
Variable Z p-value
Tannins, seasonal trend 2.58 0.009
Polyphenol September 2.35 0.018
Polyphenol, seasonal trend 2.61 0.008
Estimate Standard Wald p
Interc 0.865 0.290 8.914 0.003
Polyphenols (%) - Seasonal trend -0.262 0.124 4.437 0.035
Variable Dead Survived
Tannins (%) - seasonal trend 1.1 (0.1) 0.8 (0.1)
Polyphenols (%) - september 12.5 (0.1) 12.0 (0.1)
Polyphenols (%) - seasonal trend 2.2 (0.1) 1.8 (0.1)
Second - third instar: temperature
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Outl iers
0 18.8
9.0
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.8
10.0
10.2
10.4
10.6
10.8
Tem
epra
ture
(°C
)
Dead Survived
II - III instar Mean (SE)
Dead 9.6 (0.1)
Survived 10.1 (0.1)
Estimate Standard Wald p
Interc 3.997 1.561 6.552 0.010
Temperature 0.393 0.157 6.218 0.013
N dead = 77 N survived = 67
Colias palaeno - Comparison with german sites
Jachenau Italy Wilcoxon TestMean SE Mean SE Z p-value
Tannins (First) 11.61 0.24 8.01 0.16 7.455 0.000
Polyphenols (First) 15.55 0.29 10.29 0.20 7.589 0.000
Tannins (Second) 12.04 0.25 9.06 0.22 6.560 0.000
Polyphenols (Second) 15.75 0.29 12.51 0.28 6.242 0.000
Diff Tannins 0.43 0.14 1.05 0.15 -2.961 0.003
Diff Polyphenols 0.20 0.17 2.22 0.20 -6.107 0.000
M-W Test Italy Germany
Secondary metabolites:
higher in Germany
Seasonal trend: higher
in Italy
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Outl iersgermania ital ia
Trend fenologico
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
Tannin
i
Mean
±SE
±1.96*SE
Outl iersgermania ital ia
Contenuto fogliare
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Tannin
i
Germany Italy Germany Italy
Tan
nin
s (%
)
Tan
nin
s (%
)
First sampling Seasonal trend
1. Higher density and survival rate near the timberline
3. Possibility of phenological asynchrony
2. Different parameters (vegetation structure, secondary metabolites, temperature) are important for different immature
stages
Colias palaeno - Conclusion
Aknowledgements
Simona Bonelli
Giorgio Buffa
Matthias Dolek
Emilio Balletto
Jörg Heilmann
Guido Jürgenlimk
Peter Poschlod
In the laboratory
Hannah Bergmann
Sebastian Schwindl
And for the field work
Serena Magagnoli
Martina Zarri
Claudio Albertone
Federico Folini
Thanks for your attention!