Upload
simon-powell
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Landscape Treatment Prioritization to Reduce Northern Spotted Owl Habitat Loss from Wildfire: A Test Case Using Fire Regime and Condition Class on the Klamath RDDr. Gregg Riegel, Ecologist, Central Oregon Ecology Program, Deschutes NF
Co-authors: Jane Kertis, Fire Ecologist, USFS
Sarah Malaby, Fremont-Winema NF
John Foster, Fire Ecologist, TNC
Lois Shoemaker, Bio. Tech, Fremont-Winem, NF
District IssuesDistrict Issues
Loss of bald eagle habitatLoss of bald eagle habitat Threats of catastrophic fire Threats of catastrophic fire
to spotted owl habitatto spotted owl habitat Loss of variable stand and Loss of variable stand and
landscape composition and landscape composition and structurestructure
Project GoalsProject Goals
Develop strategic plan to reduce fuels to improve landscape resiliency
Restore landscape to appropriate appropriate composition and structure to support owls and bald eagles
ProcessProcess Conduct FRCC mapping/analysisConduct FRCC mapping/analysis
Develop a current fire risk assessmentDevelop a current fire risk assessment
Identify other issues (WUI, nest site/key Identify other issues (WUI, nest site/key owl and bald eagle habitat, fish habitat)owl and bald eagle habitat, fish habitat)
Create priority areasCreate priority areas
Recommend treatment types and timingRecommend treatment types and timing
FRCC MappingFRCC MappingCondition ClassCondition Class
1. Vegetation-fuel class1. Vegetation-fuel class
2. Fire frequency/severity2. Fire frequency/severity
FRCC Mapping:FRCC Mapping: Vegetation Fuel Classes Vegetation Fuel Classes
1. Determine PNVGs/BPS1. Determine PNVGs/BPS
2. Define appropriate “landscapes”2. Define appropriate “landscapes”
3. Crosswalk current vegetation to seral 3. Crosswalk current vegetation to seral stagestage
4. Field verification of seral stages4. Field verification of seral stages
6. Compare reference to current 6. Compare reference to current
FRCC MappingFRCC MappingDetermine Biophysical SettingsDetermine Biophysical Settings
From: 16 From: 16 Plant Plant AssociationAssociationss
To: 2To: 2BiophysicaBiophysicalSettingslSettings
Red fir-----
Mixed conifer-----
FRCC Mapping:FRCC Mapping: Define Appropriate Define Appropriate
LandscapesLandscapesLandscape size Landscape size considerations:considerations:
•Historical fire Historical fire sizessizes
•Landform and Landform and TopographyTopography
•Watershed Watershed boundariesboundaries
Crosswalk Current Crosswalk Current Vegetation to Seral StageVegetation to Seral Stage
Size ClassSize Class CanopCanopy y CoverCover
SeraSeral l CodeCode
Seral StageSeral Stage
Non-forestNon-forest NANA AA Post-replacementPost-replacement
Sapling/Pole, Sapling/Pole, SmallSmall
> 40%> 40% BB Mid-ClosedMid-Closed
Sapling/Pole, Sapling/Pole, SmallSmall
< 40%< 40% CC Mid-OpenMid-Open
Medium, Large, Medium, Large, Really BigReally Big
< 40%< 40% DD Late-OpenLate-Open
Medium, Large, Medium, Large, Really BigReally Big
> 40%> 40% EE Late-ClosedLate-Closed
FRCC MappingFRCC Mapping Field Verification of Seral Field Verification of Seral
StagesStages
Field verification of:Field verification of:
Plant Association to Plant Association to PNVGPNVG
Current vegetation Current vegetation attributes (size attributes (size class, canopy cover)class, canopy cover)
Current seral stagesCurrent seral stages
Mixed Conifer Seral Mixed Conifer Seral StagesStages
B. Mid Seral Closed
E. Late Seral Closed
E. Late Seral Closed
C. Mid Seral Open
Red Fir Seral StagesRed Fir Seral Stages
B. Mid Seral Closed E. Late Seral Closed
E. Late Seral Closed
FRCC CurrentFRCC Current Seral Stage Distribution Seral Stage Distribution
FRCC Veg-Fuel AnalysisFRCC Veg-Fuel AnalysisMixed ConiferMixed Conifer
North Middle South
Seral Stage
Reference
Current
SIM Current SIM Current SIM
A 5 14 5 6 5 15 5
B 15 25 15 44 15 26 15
C 35 21 21 19 19 34 34
D 40 6 6 4 4 3 3
E 5 34 5 27 5 22 5
SUM 52 48 62
DEP 48 52 38
VF-CC 2 2 2
FRCC Veg-Fuel AnalysisFRCC Veg-Fuel AnalysisRed FirRed Fir
North Middle
South
Seral Stage
Reference
Current
SIM Current
SIM Current
SIM
A 10 9 9 3 3 9 9
B 10 24 10 18 10 8 8
C 5 16 5 8 5 13 5
D 40 7 7 5 5 5 5
E 35 44 35 66 35 65 35
SUM 66 58 62
DEP 34 42 38
VF-CC 2 2 2
Condition ClassCondition Class
A categorical measure of departure:A categorical measure of departure:
Condition Class I =Condition Class I =within natural or historical range of within natural or historical range of variability (NRV or HRV)variability (NRV or HRV)
Condition Class II =Condition Class II =moderate departure from HRVmoderate departure from HRV
Condition Class III =Condition Class III =extreme departureextreme departure
0% 25% 75%-25%-75%% diff
Similar Over-represented
AbundantUnder-represented
Trace
Relative amount
Using FRCC Veg-Fuel Class Using FRCC Veg-Fuel Class Abundance as Treatment Abundance as Treatment
GuidanceGuidanceNorth Middle South
Seral MCON RFIR MCON RFIR MCON RFIR
A Over Similar Similar Trace
Abundant
Similar
B Over Over Over Over Over Similar
C Under Abundant
Under Over Similar Over
D Trace Trace Trace Trace
Trace Trace
E Abundant
Similar Abundant
Over Abundant
Over
FRCC Mapping:FRCC Mapping: Fire Frequency Fire Frequency and and
Severity Condition ClassSeverity Condition Class
Used local fire history information to Used local fire history information to determine reference frequency and determine reference frequency and severity for each PNVGseverity for each PNVG
Calculated MFI—(# of fires-1/100) to Calculated MFI—(# of fires-1/100) to determine current fire frequency..determine current fire frequency..
Used expert knowledge to determine Used expert knowledge to determine current fire severity. Current fire current fire severity. Current fire severities estimated at 75% compared severities estimated at 75% compared to reference mixed conifer 5%, red fir to reference mixed conifer 5%, red fir 10%10%
Current Fire Risk Current Fire Risk AssessmentAssessment
3 Components:3 Components:
1.1. Probability of ignitionProbability of ignition
2.2. Fire behavior potentialFire behavior potential
3.3. Composite fire riskComposite fire risk
Probability of IgnitionProbability of Ignition
Fire atlas records from Fire atlas records from 1960-20011960-2001
Used sections as cell sizeUsed sections as cell size
Counted all human Counted all human caused (excluding caused (excluding equipment) and lightning equipment) and lightning ignitionsignitions
Rated low (0-4 Rated low (0-4 fires/section/40 yrs); fires/section/40 yrs); moderate (5-10 fires); moderate (5-10 fires); high (> 10 fires)high (> 10 fires)
Fire Behavior PotentialFire Behavior Potential Used extreme (95tUsed extreme (95thh
percentile) weather percentile) weather conditionsconditions
Created fuel model and Created fuel model and slope class layersslope class layers
Ran BEHAVE and populated Ran BEHAVE and populated coveragecoverage
Used flame length to rate Used flame length to rate low (0-4 ft), moderate (5-8 low (0-4 ft), moderate (5-8 ft) or high (> 8 ft) fire ft) or high (> 8 ft) fire behavior riskbehavior risk
Calculated crown fire Calculated crown fire potential using flame length potential using flame length and seral stage/PNVG and seral stage/PNVG designationsdesignations
Surface fire------Crown Surface fire------Crown firefire
Other IssuesOther Issues
Wildland urban interfaceWildland urban interface Bald eagle land management unitBald eagle land management unit Spotted owl nestsSpotted owl nests Late successional reservesLate successional reserves Spotted owl core sites outside of Spotted owl core sites outside of
LSRsLSRs Fish (sucker and bull trout) habitatFish (sucker and bull trout) habitat
Create Priority AreasCreate Priority AreasWildlife Fuels/fire
Multi-Resource
Treat Priority AreasTreat Priority Areas
FRCC identifies amount seral FRCC identifies amount seral stages area deviating from stages area deviating from reference conditons (reference conditons (WHAT)WHAT)
Current fire risk identifies key Current fire risk identifies key “hot spots” from ignition and “hot spots” from ignition and fire behavior risk (fire behavior risk (WHEREWHERE))
Other issues help determine Other issues help determine WHEREWHERE and and HOWHOW to treat to treat landscapelandscape
Next StepsNext Steps1. 1. Determine schedule for treating high Determine schedule for treating high
priority blockspriority blocks
2. Begin NEPA process2. Begin NEPA process
Use information from FRCC to guide Use information from FRCC to guide how much and what kinds of stands how much and what kinds of stands to treat to treat
Run FARSITE/FLANMAP to determine Run FARSITE/FLANMAP to determine best placement of multi-resource best placement of multi-resource treatmentstreatments