26
Lab 6 Validity

Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Outline Content validity Criterion validity –Restriction of Range Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix Homework #5

Citation preview

Page 1: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Lab 6Validity

Page 2: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Picking a Topic for Your Paper

• Were you able to come up with 3 ideas?

• Let’s chat about some of the ideas to make sure we’re all on the same page about paper topics

Page 3: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Outline • Content validity• Criterion validity

– Restriction of Range• Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix• Homework #5

Page 4: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Content Validity• Do the items adequately represent all

the domains of the construct?• Measure contamination: Measure

includes items that are irrelevant to the construct of interest.

• Measure deficiency: Measure fails to include items relevant to all aspects of the construct.

Page 5: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

A well-defined construct

• Let’s say that the construct of narcissism consists of:– “a grandiose, yet fragile, sense of self and

entitlement”– “a preoccupation with success”– “demands of admiration”

Ames, D. R., Rose, P. Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440-450.

Page 6: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Content valid items?1. I am an extraordinary person.2. I insist upon getting the respect that is

due me.3. It's fun to see how far you can push

people before they get upset. 4. I often act without thinking through all

the alternatives.

Page 7: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Criterion Validity• Criterion-related evidence examines

correlations between the measure of interest and outcomes or behaviors (criteria) that should be predictable from the measure.

• The strength of the observed correlation is used to support the validity of the measure.

Page 8: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Criterion Validity• For example, a person’s Agreeableness

ought to be related (negatively) to counterproductive school behaviors.

• Agreeableness measures interpersonal orientation. Higher scorers are seen as helpful, trusting, and kind.

• We have such data in the Big Survey!• What is this validity coefficient?

Page 9: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Agreeableness Items• I feel little concern for others. (Reverse)• I sympathize with others' feelings. • I am not interested in other people's

problems. (Reverse)

Page 10: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Counterproductive School Behaviors – Interpersonal

Domain• Made fun of someone at school.• Cursed at someone at school.• Publicly embarrassed someone at

school.• Made a derogatory ethnic, religious, or

racial remark at school.

Page 11: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Criterion Validity• Examine the distributions of Agreeableness

scores (IPIPA) and Counterproductive School Behaviors (CSBInter)

• Calculate the means, medians and SDs for these variables. Look at the Scatterplot.

• Calculate the correlation coefficient. (IPIPA with CSBInter). This is the validity coefficient.

Page 12: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Restriction of Range• What happens when the variability of

the predictor or the criterion is limited?• For example, the Graduate Record

Exam (GRE) is designed to predict success in graduate school. What happens when we look for evidence of criterion validity of the GRE?

Page 13: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Restriction of Range• How does restriction of range affect

criterion validity estimates?• Restrict the sample on Agreeableness

(.5 SD or above the mean) and recalculate the descriptive statistics, scatterplot, and validity coefficient.

• What happened?

Page 14: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Convergent Validity• Convergent validity – the measure is

related to other measures of the same construct– Different types of thermometers all give

similar estimates of air temperature.

Page 15: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Discriminant Validity• Discriminant validity – the measure is

unrelated to measures of different constructs in theoretical predicted ways.– Measures of barometric pressure are not

related to measures of temperature.

Page 16: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix

• The multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix is a table of correlation coefficients that enables us to simultaneously evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of a construct.

• If our measures are valid, we should see a pattern emerge between the correlations of our measures.

(Hoyle, Harris, & Judd, 2002)

Page 17: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix• Assume you measure three constructs

(or traits) using three different methods.– Traits: Anger, Guilt, Depression– Measures: Test, Clinical Rating, Self-

report

Page 18: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Psychological Test Clinical Rating Self Rating

A1 G1 D1 A2 G2 D2 A3 G3 D3

Psychological Test

A1 1.0

G1 1.0

D1 1.0

Clinical R

ating

A2 1.0

G2 1.0

D2 1.0

Self Rating

A3 1.0

G3 1.0

D3 1.0

Page 19: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix• The main diagonal is the correlation of

the variable with itself and is by definition 1.0.

• It is common practice to replace the main diagonal entries with estimates of reliability, such as alpha or other estimates as appropriate.

Page 20: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix• The Blue diagonals are heteromethod-

monotrait correlations (trait effects).• Convergent validity diagonals

(different measures of the same construct converge and provide the same measurement)

• They should be very high (~ 0.5)

Page 21: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix• The Green blocks are monomethod,

heterotrait correlations (method effects).• Discriminant validity (measures of

different traits should not be highly correlated)

• They should be low (~ 0.2).

Page 22: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Multitrait Multimethod Matrix• The Purple blocks are heteromethod,

heterotrait correlations (nonsense correlations).

• They should be very close to zero.

Page 23: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Reliabilities, Convergent validities, Method effects, Nonsense validities

Psychological Test Clinical Rating Self Rating

A1 G1 D1 A2 G2 D2 A3 G3 D3

Psychological Test

A1 (.91)

G1 .21 (.93)

D1 .22 .23 (.90)

Clinical R

ating

A2 .82 .01 .02 (.96)

G2 .02 .80 .03 .23 (.93)

D2 .04 .06 .81 .21 .22 (.89)

Self Rating

A3 .80 .05 .03 .79 .05 .02 (.92)

G3 .02 .81 .06 .01 .82 .01 .20 (.91)

D3 .01 .04 .83 .02 .04 .83 .19 .24 (.93)

Page 24: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

MTMM for Homework• Published in Campbell & Fiske (1959)

from this original paper:• Carroll, J. B. (1952). Ratings on traits

measured by a factored personality inventory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 626-632.

Page 25: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

What you need to turn in for HW #5

• Report descriptive statistics (mean, median, and standard deviation) for Agreeableness and Counter Productive Behaviors. Calculate the correlation between these variables. Interpret this score in terms of the criterion validity of the Agreeableness Measure. (2 points)

• Restrict scores on Agreeableness to 0.5 SD above the mean and higher. Find the correlation between Agreeableness and Counter Productive Behaviors. What happened and why? (2 points)

• Examine the attached MTMM. Identify the 3 convergent validity correlations for each of the 3 traits. Make a table of those correlations. (3 points)

• Identify the patterns of discriminant validity for self-ratings and the psychological test. Make a table for both sets. Which set appears to have a higher degree of discriminant validity? (3 points)

Page 26: Lab 6 Validity. Picking a Topic for Your Paper Were you able to come up with 3 ideas? Let’s chat about…

Psychological Test Clinical Rating Self Rating

A1 G1 D1 A2 G2 D2 A3 G3 D3

Psychological Test

A1 (.91)

G1 .21 (.93)

D1 .22 .23 (.90

)

Clinical R

ating

A2 .62 .01 .02 (.96)

G2 .02 .59 .03 .34 (.93)

D2 .04 .06 .42 .43 .41 (.89)

Self Rating

A3 .80 .05 .03 .55 .05 .02 (.92)

G3 .02 .81 .06 .01 .65 .01 .20 (.91)

D3 .01 .04 .83 .02 .04 .39 .19 .24 (.93)

Reliabilities, Convergent validities, Discriminant validities, Discriminant validities