Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Korea’s Internet-Only Banks: Lessons from
Korea’s Experience
Sukgeun Lee
Professor
Sogang Business School
Sogang University
2
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
2. Experiences and achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
3. Challenges
4. Key Lessons
Content
3
Korean financial industry is in a weak position relatively considering the size of
Korean economy that is 10th-12th in the world
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Tier 1 Capital Comparison
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
2014 2015 2016 2017
China Thailand Indonesia
Hongkong South Korea
Source: The Banker, “Top 1000 World Banks 2018”, 2018.02.07
Ranking of Financial Industry (WEF 2017)
4
Japan and China have approved ICT companies to run Internet-Only Banks in 2000
and 2013 respectively
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Differentiated competencies Shareholders Internet-Only Banks
Jibun Bank
Rakuten Bank
My Bank
We Bank
• ID registration and bank account
opening by mobile
• Mobile money transfer using mo
bile number
• E-mail money transfer
• Financial products recommendation
• Credit rating using big data
analysis(Taobao purchase data)
• High interest loan using consumer
data analysis
• KDDI(50%)
• Mitsubishi UJF Financial
Group(50%)
• Rakuten(100%)
• Ant Financial(30%)
• Fusun Group(25%)
• Wanxiang Group(10%)
• Tencent(30%),
5
In 2000, Japanese government has approved Internet-Only Bank to boost growth of
financial industry through new technology and capital from ICT industry
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
ROA ROE
Profitability of Japanese Banks Seven Bank Total Balance and Number of Accounts
63 108 163
225 331
466 580
688 775
885 971
1066
1214
1405
1562 1690
1827
-150
50
250
450
650
850
1050
1250
1450
1650
1850
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
balance of time deposits
outstanding balance of ordinary deposits
number of individual accounts
Source: Seven Bank IR, 4Q 2018 Source: Statistics in Japan
6
In 2013, Chinese Government also approved Internet-Only Bank by ICT companies
to uplift the growth of stagnant financial market
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Profitability of Chinese Banks WeBank Operating Income and Asset [Bn RMB]
Source: We Bank IR, 4Q 2018 Source: Statistics in China
36.33%
18.96%
14.48%
9.30% 7.80% 7.70%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
2011 2012 2013
Net Profit Growth Rate in Banking
GDP Growth Rate
2.26 24.49 67.48 100.2984 96.21
519.95
817.04
2200.37
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2015 2016 2017 2018Operating Income Total Asset
7
Korean government has decided to leverage strength of internet infrastructure to
stimulate the growth of Korean financial industry via fintech and Internet-Only Bank
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Annual Global Fintech Deals and (Bn USD)
8.34
16.3
19.29 18
39.57
885
1153
1254
1480
1707
-50
150
350
550
750
950
1150
1350
1550
1750
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
financing deals
Source: “2019 Fintech Trends to Watch”, CB insights , 2019
Internet Penetration/ speed by country
Source: World Fact Book, Eurostat
Source: OOKLA SPEEDTEST, 2017
8
While Korea FSS has tried to introduce Internet-Only Bank, there were 2 major
regulatory obstacles to overcome for the approval of the Internet-Only Bank
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Separation of industrial and financial capital 1
Real-name financial system 2
‘Financial Real Name Act’
article 3-1
Financial companies are
obliged to check the real name
of the trader only by face to
face verification
Non-financial companies are allowed to own 4% (or 10% non voting right) of bank‟s shares to
keep conglomerates out of banking industry and to prevent misuse of consumer deposits
> “Execution Plan for Internet-Only Banks” of FSC in June 2015 suggested that non-financial
shareholder limit be lifted from 4% to 50%, which enables ICT companies to enter into
banking industry
Existing law: Visit off-line branches when opening new
bank accounts
Changed law (Dec 2015)
- Verification with copy of identification card
- Video call
- Confirmation while direct delivering (etc. credit cards)
- Use existing bank accounts
9
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
3. Challenges
4. Key Lessons
Content
10
FSC (Financial Supervisory Commission) has set the basics of establishment for
Internet-Only Bank through „Special Act for Internet-Only Banks‟
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Comparison of Banking Act and Special Act for Internet-Only Banking
Non-financial
Shareholding
Limit
Lending to major
shareholder
Minimum Capital
Internet-Only Bank Act Banking Act
4% 10% including non-voting
shares
34%*
25% of Equity Prohibited
25 million USD 1 billion USD
* It was 10% in 2015 at the launching of Internet-Only Bank, yet amended to 34% in 2018
11
In 2017, first Korean Internet-Only Banks, K Bank and Kakao Bank, have launched
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
First Internet-Only Banks in Korea
K Bank Kakao Bank
Initial Capital (M USD) 250 300
Staff Number 142 140
CEO Shim Sang Hoon Yoon Ho Young, Lee Yong Woo
Main Stakeholder
Woori Bank(10%), GS
Retail(10%), Hanwha Life(10%),
KT(8%)
Korea Holdings(54%),
Kakao(10%), KB Kookmin
Bank(10%)
Banking System KT DS, Woori FIS LG CNS
Request for Permission September 30th, 2016 December 2016
Beginning of Business April 2017 July 2017
12
Since launching, both Internet-Only Banks over-achieved their target in customer
acquisition while Kakao Bank acquired customers by 9 times more than K bank
Customer Growth of Internet-Only Banks
19
327
444 499
546 585 618 641 700
764
891
35.8%
12.4% 9.4% 7.1% 5.6% 3.7%
9.2% 9.1%
16.6%
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0
800
1600
4 25 36 45 56 62 68 73 76 79 84 89 98
44.0%
25.0% 24.4%
10.7% 9.7% 7.4% 4.1% 3.9% 6.3% 6.0%
10.1%
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0
800
1600
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
13
The successful customer acquisition was possible thanks to the innovative products
and services of Internet-Only banks
Innovative Services and Products
Customer Services
Fund transfer with telephone number, name, without full authentication
Biometric Security system for enhancing securities
24/7 Customer Services Representatives(CSR, K Bank Only)
Banking Services
Banking Products
Simplified Opening for a new account
Commission exemptions for withdrawal, transactions with other
banks
Micro-loaning services (5.5% upto 5K usd regardless of credit rating)
Quicker credit loan (2.67% up to 100K usd 24 hr)
Daily interest payment account (1.2% annual deposit rate for checking a/c)
Parent company linked products (not available for traditional banks)
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
14
-50%
Kakao Bank K Bank
-100
-50
0
Kakao Bank K Bank
However, both K bank and Kakao bank are making loss due to heavy initial
investment and aggressive offerings for lower margin such as fee exemptions
Operation Profit (loss) (M USD)
2017 2018
Capital Impairment Ratio
2017 2018 0
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
15
Cost structure of Internet-Only Bank also shows clear inefficiency compared with
those of traditional banks in terms of fee expenses and SG&A
Shinhan KEB Woori Kookmin Kakao Bank K Bank
Profit before allowance
accumulation per employee 0.207 0.198 0.171 0.173 (0.012) (0.182)
Deposit per employee 17.6 18.0 17.3 16.6 17.9 4.64
Loan amount per employee 14.1 14.3 13.8 13.5 15.1 3.36
Total employees(#) 13,639 12,795 13,683 16,729 414 299
Efficiency Analysis (M USD)
Shinhan KEB Woori Kookmin Kakao Bank K Bank
Interest expenses 1 1 1 1 1 1
Fees expenses 3.8% 4.8% 4.1% 7.6% 115.5% 62.5%
S&GA 55.1% 75.7% 88.5% 99.6% 117.4% 346.6%
Extra cost 2.8% 0.6% 10.9% 5.0% 12.7% 0.0%
Efficiency Analysis (Interest Expanses = 1)
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
16
The inefficient cost structure expect to be improved as Internet-Only Banks extend
product/ services which currently covers only partial of incumbent banks‟
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
K Bank Kakao Bank Traditional Banks
General Commission fees Exemption (**) Available Available Not Available
24/7 CSR Available Not Available Not Available
Public Authentication required Not Required Not Required Required
Biometric Security System Available △ △
Simplified account opening Available Available Not Available
Comparison of Available Services of Internet-only banks with Traditional Banks
K Bank Kakao Bank Traditional Banks
Micro-loans serviced within an hour Available Available Not Available
Quicker loans Available Available Not Available
Daily interest-paying account Available Available MMF Account only(*)
Parent Company linked product Savings
- reward linkage
Savings
- reward linkage
-
Comparison of Available Products of Internet-only banks with Traditional Banks
17
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Intrinsic Business K Bank Kakao Bank
Retail deposits & savings Available Available
Retail loans △ △
Corporate deposits Not Available Not Available
Corporate loans Not Available Not Available
Issuance of securities and other debt certificates Not Available Not Available
Bill discount Not Available △
Foreign exchange △ △
Intrinsic Banking Business – Defined by the South Korean Banking Act (2017)
Incidental Services – Defined by the South Korean Banking Act (2017)
Subsidiary Business K Bank Kakao Bank
Debt guarantee Not Available Not Available
Acceptance of draft Not Available Not Available
Factoring Not Available Not Available
Syndicated loan Not Available Not Available
RP - Government/Public debt transaction Not Available Not Available
Stock lock-up Not Available Not Available
Safe deposit box Not Available Not Available
FX transactions Not Available Not Available
Payment agent Not Available Not Available
Financial task intermediary – for other institutions Not Available Not Available
The inefficient cost structure expect to be improved as Internet-Only Banks extend
product/ services which currently covers only partial of incumbent banks‟ (Cont‟d)
18
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
Business K Bank Kakao Bank
Trust Not Available Not Available
Credit Card Not Available Not Available
Check-Card (Debit Card) Available Available
Wealth management corporation task/Sales intermediates △ Not Available
Concurrent Business – Defined by the South Korean Banking Act (2017)
The inefficient cost structure expect to be improved as Internet-Only Banks extend
product/ services which currently covers only partial of incumbent banks‟ (Cont‟d)
19
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Bank in South Korea
2. Experience and Achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
3. Challenges
4. Key Lessons
Content
20
Legal and Regulatory – Deregulation of separation of industrial and financial capital
3. Challenges
Arguments against the separation
1) Although it was necessary for government to control capital for optimal distribution for industrial
development in early „60s and „70s, such need for government intervention became weak as capital
is overflowing in most of conglomerates
2) There is also insufficient need for conglomerates to raise capital via their own bank as capital
market grow bigger and more efficient for direct funding
3) If regulation of separation of industrial and financial capital restricts 10% of bank shares and 4%
voting rights, this will not only block capital infusion from ICT companies into internet-only banks but
also discourage entering of ICT firms in banking industry
4) Limitation of capital infusion will affect BIS maintenance of Internet-only bank, which then directly
relates to the operation of banks in both lending and deposit
On Oct 16, 2018, the National Assembly finally amended
the Banking Act only for internet-only banks and passed the
“Act on Special Cases Concerning Establishment and Operation of Internet-Only Banks”,
which allow the limit of industrial capital shares increase up to 34%
21
Legal and Regulatory – Bank Major Shareholder Qualification Issue
Eligibility check by FSC and violation of the Monopoly Regulation Fair Trade Act
Act on Corporate Governance of Financial Companies regulates qualification of major shareholder in
any kind of bank and FSC must confirmed that there is no eligibility issues under following checklists
3. Challenges
Eligibility
checklist
Disqualification of major shareholder; in case of following violation
- Banking Act
- Capital Market and Financial Investment Business Act
- Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes (e.g.
Seizure, Breach of duty, Money Laundering)
- Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act
- Punishment of Tax Evaders Act
KT Charges KT has a record of violation related to the ‘ Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act ’
Kakao Charges President of Kakao’s board was convicted on suspicion of the ‘ Monopoly Regulation
and Fair Trade Act ’
While Kakao Bank‟s eligibility issues has been resolved, which enabled capital infusion
from the kakao bank‟s parent company up to 34%, KT eligibility issue has been pended
so far, which blocked capital injection by KT, parent company of K Bank and hampered
banking service seriously
Regulation by the Act on Corporate Governance of Financial Companies
22
Legal and Regulatory – Privacy law vs Big Data based CSS
Privacy Law blocking the access of Internet-Only Bank to BHC (Bank Holding Company)‟s data
Korean privacy law states, “Private information with individual identification code should not be
transferred into other firms unless customers granted it so”
The National Assembly could not pass deregulation of the privacy law in 2019
Parent
companies Internet
Only Bank Can’t access
BHC’s data
KT(Tele-communications)
Kakao(Social Networks)
Distributors
Existing Banks
Investment Banks, Etc..
3. Challenges
Privacy law as obstacle for big data based CSS of Internet-Only Banks
23
Operations – Complicate Governance Structure
Governance Structure of Internet-Only Banks
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Yes24
Nermarble
Seoul Guarantee Insurance
Korea Post
Ebay Korea
Skyblue(Tencent)
Kakao
KB Kookmin Bank
Korea Investment Holdings
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Woori Bank
KT
NT Investment & Securities
Hanwha Life Insurance
GS Retail
KG Inicis
Danal
Others
Kakao Bank‟s 11 shareholders K Bank‟s 19 shareholders
“Complicated governance structure can cause delay of decision due to the potential
conflict of interests among shareholders, which will be issue especially when
the banks need to make major decision quickly”
* K Bank has history of failure in relation to raising capital twice. (2018 02, 2018 07)
3. Challenges
24
Operations – Slower growth of customer
3. Challenges
Growth of Kakao Bank‟s customer Growth of K Bank‟s customer
Both Internet-Only Banks are experiencing problem of slower growth of customers,
which is causing problem of BEP (Break Even Point) management
19
327
444499
546 585 618 641700
764
891
35.8%
12.4% 9.4% 7.1% 5.6% 3.7%9.2% 9.1%
16.6%
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0
400
800
1200
Source: Kakao Bank Source: K Bank
4 25 36 45 56 62 68 73 76 79 84 89 98
44.0%
25.0% 24.4%
10.7% 9.7% 7.4% 4.1% 3.9% 6.3% 6.0%10.1%
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0
400
800
1200
25
Competition – Traditional Banks‟ reaction against Internet-Only Banks
New Mobile Services Platforms of Traditional Banks
New Mobile Banking Service Platforms introduced by traditional banks narrow gap
between offerings of traditional banks and Internet-only banks‟
Main
Benefits
Mobile
Services
Platforms of
Traditional
Banks
Shinhan KEB Woori Kookmin
User-friendly (customized) platforms (Common)
Provide personal-customized banking systems
Robo-Advisor to recommend services (KEB)
Provide special benefits relating the bank‟s products & services
FX transaction fees discount (KEB, Shinhan, Kookmin)
Providing higher deposit rate (Woori, Shinhan, Kookmin)
3. Challenges
26
Competition – Increasing efficiency of traditional banks
Offline branch reduction of traditional banks
End of 2016 June, 2017 End of 2017 End of 2018
Kookmin 1061 1066 996 981
Woori 862 887 826 819
KEB 867 819 767 726
Shinhan 854 899 834 805
Total 3604 3671 3423 3331
Change 27 -248 -92
K Bank launch Kakao Bank launch
Traditional banks have reduced branches substantially (92 in 2018, 66 until 3Q 2019)
after launch of Internet-Only Banks, which decrease costs and increase investment for
digitalization of the banks including mobile channel and new services that neutralize the
differentiated products/services of Internet-only banks.
Such impacts on the incumbent banks by internet-only bank are called „CATFISH‟ effect
3. Challenges
27
Competition – New Entries
New Entries
“FSC announced that they would license 3rd and/or 4th Internet-Only Bank in 2019”
Main Candidate Industry Reason for Rejection in 1st round
Fintech
(Mobile Transfer)
Investment Bank
Capital financing adequacy issues
Main partner, US VC(Altos Ventures)‟s
adequacy as bank shareholder is questioned
Feasibility of initial capital injection for bank is
questioned
Innovation issues
Innovative feature of BM is questioned
Simple summation of Investment bank and
Commercial bank is not innovative enough?
3. Challenges
28
1. Emergence of Internet-Only Bank in South Korea
2. Experience and achievement of Internet-Only Banks in South Korea
3. Challenges
4. Key Lessons
Content
29
4. Key Lessons
• 120 days to acquire 1 million customers
(K Bank)
• 2 days to acquire 1 million & 8 days for
2 million customers (Kakao Bank)
Positive Influence on traditional banks
Customer Acquisition
What Worked Well What needs to be Improved
• Competitive rates (higher deposit, lower
lending rates) offers benefit to
customers and lowered rates of
traditional banks
• Continued off-line branch reductions
increases cost efficiency of traditional
banks
• Digitalization of traditional banks
triggered
• Better alignment of new policy with
existing regulatory framework could
mitigate uncertainty to the management of
Internet-Only banks and bank customers
Differentiated products/servicies
Regulatory alignment
• Insufficient introduction of innovative
products/services
• Customer profile, product portfolio, mobile
channel is not differentiated enough
Improved CSS
• No clear advantages from CSS that is
supposed to be developed on big data
• Privacy law banned customer information
access within BHC
Key Lessons – What worked well and What needs to be improved
30
4. Key Lessons
• Internet-only banks with various non-financial shareholders will be able to
collaborate with various shareholders and fintech firms more easily than traditional
banks
• Collaboration with fintech firms and formation of open innovation with them will
provide source of innovation
More market entries
More Collaboration with fintech firms
• As number of Internet-only bank increases, it will stimulate competition among
banks and bring more capital to financial industry and more benefits to financial
consumers
Continued innovation: techfin vs fintech
• More innovative technology will be available, which will lead more innovation for
financial products/services that will attract more customers and go beyond scope
of regulation and business domains of financial industry
More opportunities for Internet-Only banks, consumers, and financial industry are
coming for win-win