33
Impact on Network Architecture and Economics Internet Peering Brough Turner Founder & CTO, netBlazr Inc.

Internet peering, graphics only

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

These are the graphics (in higher resolution) for my presentation, Internet Peering with annotations. See "Internet Peering, with annotations" for details.

Citation preview

Page 1: Internet peering, graphics only

Impact on Network Architecture and Economics

Internet Peering

Brough Turner Founder & CTO, netBlazr Inc.

Page 2: Internet peering, graphics only

Today’s Network of Networks

12 March 2014 2

Billions of Internet users

Tens of Millions of Networks

Access ISPs

IXP

IXP

Backbones

IXP Aggregation Regional

Page 3: Internet peering, graphics only

12 March 2014 3

Page 4: Internet peering, graphics only

1991

 NSF lifts restrictions on commercial use

 SURFnet, PSInet & AlterNET form CIX exchange

12 March 2014 4

Page 5: Internet peering, graphics only

1993 Plan – 1995 Reality

12 March 2014 5

Page 6: Internet peering, graphics only

12 March 2014 6

AGIS, ANS, BBN, CERFnet, MCI, PSInet, SprintLink

NAP NAP

Page 7: Internet peering, graphics only

12 March 2014 7

AGIS, ANS, BBN, CERFnet, MCI, PSInet, SprintLink

NAP NAP

Page 8: Internet peering, graphics only

De-peering   UUNET – April/May 1997   MAE-East FDDI shutdown – Feb 2001   Cable & Wireless – May 2001   Sprint – gradual 2001/2002

12 March 2014 8

Page 9: Internet peering, graphics only

Donut Peering

12 March 2014 9

Tier 1 ISPs

Access ISPs

Tier 2 ISPs

Cable Co’s

Large, savvy content providers

Content providers

$

$

$ $

$

Page 10: Internet peering, graphics only

Donut Peering

12 March 2014 10

Tier 1 ISPs

Access ISPs

Tier 2 ISPs

Cable Co’s

Large, savvy content providers

Content providers

P P

P

$

$

$ $

$

Page 11: Internet peering, graphics only

Donut Peering

12 March 2014 11

Tier 1 ISPs

Access ISPs

Tier 2 ISPs

Cable Co’s

Large, savvy content providers

Content providers

P P

P

$

$

$ $ $ $

$

Page 12: Internet peering, graphics only

CDNs emerge

12 March 2014 12

IXP IXP CDN NOC

Page 13: Internet peering, graphics only

CDNs emerge

12 March 2014 13

IXP IXP CDN NOC

Page 14: Internet peering, graphics only

Turbulence

12 March 2014 14

  UUNET (Alternet) MFS Worldcom Verizon   ANS AOL "

  SprintLink Sprint   BBN GTE Genuity Level 3   MCI Cable & Wireless   CERFnet AT&T   AGIS Telia   PSInet (US) Cogent

(Canada) Telus (EU) Interroute

Page 15: Internet peering, graphics only

ISP1

Peering vs Transit

12 March 2014 15

Backbone

ISP2

ISP

U U U

U ISP ISP

ISPx

Transit

Page 16: Internet peering, graphics only

ISP1

Peering vs Transit

12 March 2014 16

Backbone

ISP2

ISP

U U U

U ISP ISP

ISPx Peering

Transit

Page 17: Internet peering, graphics only

ISP1

Peering vs Transit

12 March 2014 17

Backbone

ISP2

ISP

U U U

U ISP ISP

ISPx Peering

Transit

Page 18: Internet peering, graphics only

Peering Technology   Internet Protocol –

  IPv4 == 98% of all traffic   IPv6 == ~2% of traffic

  Border Gateway Protocol –  Based on distance and path  Routing information exchanged between

Autonomous Systems

12 March 2014 18

Page 19: Internet peering, graphics only

Border Gateway Protocol

12 March 2014 19

ISP1

ISP2

A

B

C

My Edge Router

Page 20: Internet peering, graphics only

Border Gateway Protocol

12 March 2014 20

ISP1

ISP2

A

B

C

I can handle traffic for A in 3 hops &

for B in 1 hop

My Edge Router

Page 21: Internet peering, graphics only

Border Gateway Protocol

12 March 2014 21

ISP1

ISP2

A

B

C

I can handle traffic for A in 3 hops &

for B in 1 hop

My Edge Router

Page 22: Internet peering, graphics only

Border Gateway Protocol

12 March 2014 22

ISP1

ISP2

A

B

C

I can handle traffic for A in 3 hops &

for B in 1 hop

1.  Do I believe your offer? 2.  Who has shortest path? 3.  Are there $ considerations? 4.  Add routes to routes table.

My Edge Router

Page 23: Internet peering, graphics only

Economics of a Growing ISP   Transit from one upstream

  Circuit (transport) to an open IXP  Transit from two or more upstreams  Peering for content (Google, Akamai, etc.)

  Transport to other IXPs  Peering for additional traffic

12 March 2014 23

Page 24: Internet peering, graphics only

Costs of YouTube-like growth

12 March 2014 24

Page 25: Internet peering, graphics only

Peering in Practice

12 March 2014 25

  2011 survey of 4,331 ISPs (86% of the backbone) analyzed 142K interconnections

  Settlement-free peering dominates  99.5% based on handshake agreements  99.7% symmetric

  Typical peering requirements  Operations (24 hr NOC; enough traffic)  Technical (shortest prefix; consistency)  General (NDAs, Suspend at will)

  Emergence of multi-lateral peering

Page 26: Internet peering, graphics only

Governing Law Preferences

12 March 2014 26

Source: Survey of Characteristics of Internet Carrier Interconnection Agreements by Woodcock & Adhikari, Packet Clearing House. May 2011

Probability of selection as a country of governing law

Page 27: Internet peering, graphics only

Multi-lateral peering emerges

12 March 2014 27

Source: Survey of Characteristics of Internet Carrier Interconnection Agreements by Woodcock & Adhikari, Packet Clearing House. May 2011

Number of networks (X axis) with each quantity of peering partners (Y axis)

Page 28: Internet peering, graphics only

Many BGP sessions for Bi-lateral traffic exchange

12 March 2014 28

ISP1

ISP3

ISP2

ISP4

ISP5

Page 29: Internet peering, graphics only

Multi-lateral Peering

12 March 2014 29

ISP1

ISP3

ISP2

ISP4

ISP5

Route Server

Page 30: Internet peering, graphics only

Tier 1s and everyone else

12 March 2014 30

Number of advertised IPv4 addresses (Y axis) vs number of interconnects/ISP

Source: Survey of Characteristics of Internet Carrier Interconnection Agreements by Woodcock & Adhikari, Packet Clearing House. May 2011

Tier 1 ISPs

Page 31: Internet peering, graphics only

Market concentration declining

12 March 2014 31

Page 32: Internet peering, graphics only

The Internet

12 March 2014 32

  A voluntary agreement among network operators to exchange traffic for their mutual benefit.

  Fred Goldstein, TMCnews, June 2009

  Essentially unregulated   Largely informal   Not well understood by outsiders

  Extremely successful

Page 33: Internet peering, graphics only

Brough Turner netBlazr Inc.

[email protected]

12 March 2014 33

Thank You