Upload
alvin-arnold
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
King George Wireless Authority
Joseph W. GrzeikaChairman
King George Board of Supervisors
Background
In mid 90’s Board of Supervisors added requirements on all new cell phone tower special exceptions to allow county use of tower for county communication purposes
By early 2000’s Internet Access was becoming more of an expected “utility” vice “nice to have”
Background Continued
2003 General Assembly enacted Wireless Service Authority Act (Code of Va. 15.2-5431.10)
2007 General Assembly added Wireless broadband equipment and infrastructure to definition of Public Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act (PPEA)
Project Summary 2006 King George formed Wireless
Authority Board of Directors are the Board of Supervisors Identified need;
Private suppliers (Verizon, Cable franchisee, and satellite) not serving many rural areas of county
Economic Development impacted by availability of broadband in county
Defense Contractors and employees need reliable broadband access at work and home
Commercial sector reliant upon internet Sheriff/EMS/Schools/County Admin needs reliable
county wide access to broadband
Project Summary (Continued)
2006-2007 Board developed and issued Request for Qualifications Asked for vendors to propose
solutions that would achieve 95% geographic coverage
Public-Private partnership desired Open to all approaches that achieve
the goals
Project Summary (Continued)
4 Proposals received and evaluated Various responses, pure fee for
service, franchises, etc Virginia Broad Band selected,
regional wireless company
Project Summary (Continued)
Spring 2007 Worked with VABB to develop contract
Identified existing assets (Communications and County Service Authority Towers)
Network deployment goals Financing plan
December 2007 Finalized deal Conceptually
Project Summary (Continued) January 2008 Wireless Authority/VABB
sign Contract and close on financing VABB responsible for development and
implementation of Network VABB responsible for all marketing, customer
service, billing Authority obtains Financing (Loan to VABB due
to Authority repayment schedule in contract) $740,000 obtained through local bank, incremental
disbursement based on schedule of activity Authority has applied for Stimulus funds –
none received to date
Project Summary (Continued)
Spring 2008 VABB Commences deployment Pilot equipment installed
Summer 2008 first subscribers signed up and VABB works with Schools to provide portion of their network
Project Summary (Continued)
Summer 2008 Tower Owners raise issues with
access despite provisions VABB continues installation on
unaffected towers and increase customer base
Authority works through the legal issues with tower access
Project Summary (Continued)
Current Status Issues with all but 1 of the Towers
resolved through negotiation VABB is operational on 4 towers In process of deploying on 4
additional towers (operational by end of calendar year)
Project Summary (Continued)
Current Status (Continued) 1 tower still in dispute
County provides access to towers identified as Phase 1 in contract
VABB responsible for marketing and network operations
Project Summary (Continued) Status
Delay in access to towers has impacted deployment schedule:
70% geographic coverage in Phase 1 delayed almost 1 year
Authority will conduct Network Assessment Acceptance Test upon completion of Phase 1 to ensure coverage met
VABB to provide Authority with regular progress/financial reports per contract
Project Summary (Continued) Status (Continued) Work Outstanding
Phase 2 completion (95% geographic coverage)
Network Service to Governmental Agencies Free/discounted service/training to Digital
Inclusion Residents VABB assumes payment for Phase 2 facilities Procure follow-on Network Agreement
Challenges/Lessons Tower agreement provisions need to be as
broad as possible to allow Authority use Competitors will react to deployment
Local cable provider aggressively deploying fiber; but not seeing them expand their coverage to less dense areas
Verizon does not seem interested in rural county
Broad Band is the new Utility Service residents expect
Challenges/Lessons (Continued)
Provider needs to be in tune with the market and step up to serve the new areas
Rural areas pose technical challenges that the provider needs to solve: Terrain Tree Canopy New Equipment/changes to Technology Small (5-20 house clusters) Customer Service – reflects on the county
Challenges/Lessons (Continued) Deployment takes much longer than
you expect – manage expectations Establish customer service and
marketing requirements in the contract
Competitive Environment poses challenges to obtaining reports/data while protecting the provider’s proprietary information
Conclusion
Broad Band is the “New Utility” Rural Markets are not high on the
commercial providers priority due to the density/business payoffs
Tower Access Key King George Still a work in process Questions?